Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32554
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor錢玉芬zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChien,Yu Fenen_US
dc.contributor.author康家維zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorKang, Chia Weien_US
dc.creator康家維zh_TW
dc.creatorKang, Chia Weien_US
dc.date2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T05:24:14Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T05:24:14Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T05:24:14Z-
dc.identifierG0937520151en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32554-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description心理學研究所zh_TW
dc.description93752015zh_TW
dc.description96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract為建立適用於本土文化的品牌性格量表(brand personality scale),本研究以主位取向(emic approach)的角度,採取基本語彙策略(fundamental lexical strategy),依序建構「品牌性格語彙詞庫」與編製「品牌性格量表」,以期建立的量表具有本土契合性(indigenous compatibility)。本研究以六個階段依序進行,在語彙詞庫建構部分,透過「知名品牌調查」、「性格語彙蒐集」與「品牌性格語彙篩選」三個階段,得到253組相似詞組,收錄959個品牌性格語彙。最後,再利用使用頻率區分使用層級,進而建構出「品牌性格語彙詞庫」與「性格語彙檢索表」。在量表編製部分,則包含品牌性格語彙適合性調查、品牌性格語彙與品牌配對,以及品牌性格調查三個階段。經因素分析主成份法與信度分析,得到「知性與感性」、「冒險創新」、「能幹可靠」,以及「純淨健康」四個品牌性格構面,信度分別為.99、.97、.96與.91,總解釋變異量為87.45%;經純化後,四構面的信度分別為.96、.95、.94與.88,題項由89題縮減至37題。\n本研究透過對譯方式,分別與Aaker建構美國和日本品牌性格構面進行跨文化比較。結果顯示:(1)本土與美日的品牌性格構面不具有一對一的對應關係;(2)本土品牌性格構面,僅有「冒險創新」構面特質較接近美國「Excitement」構面(達47.62%),而「知性與感性」、「能幹可靠」與「純淨健康」三構面分別有57.14%、70.59%與69.23%的性格特質未出現在美國品牌性格構面中;(3)本土品牌性格構面,僅有「純淨健康」構面特質較接近日本「Sincerity」構面(達38.46%),而「知性與感性」、「冒險創新」與「能幹可靠」三構面則分別有69.05%、71.43%與70.59%的性格特質未出現在日本品牌性格中。此說明,本研究建立品牌性格構面在本質上是異於美國與日本品牌性格構面,是可以反映本土重視的品牌性格特質。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄 i\n表目錄 v\n圖目錄 vii\n第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究背景 1\n第二節 研究動機與研究目的 2\n第二章 文獻探討 5\n第一節 品牌性格的意義與測量 5\n一、 品牌性格的意義 5\n二、 品牌性格的測量 8\n第二節 品牌性格與人類性格 13\n一、 品牌性格與人類性格的本質 13\n二、 品牌性格與人類性格的形成方式 14\n三、 基本語彙取向 15\n四、 人類的性格構面與品牌的性格構面的互通性 16\n第三節 品牌性格與文化 20\n一、 品牌性格與文化 20\n二、 性格模型的跨文化普同性 21\n三、 品牌性格量表的本土契合性 22\n第四節 研究問題 24\n第三章 研究方法 25\n第一節 品牌性格語彙詞庫之建構 26\n一、 階段一:知名品牌調查 26\n二、 階段二:本土性格語彙蒐集 29\n三、 階段三:品牌性格語彙篩選 37\n四、 品牌性格語彙詞庫建構方式 40\n第二節 品牌性格本土化量表之編製 40\n一、 階段四:品牌性格語彙適合性調查 40\n二、 階段五:品牌性格語彙與品牌的配對 42\n三、 階段六:品牌性格調查 43\n第四章 研究結果 49\n第一節 階段一:知名品牌調查 49\n第二節 階段二:本土性格語彙蒐集 51\n第三節 階段三:品牌性格語彙 52\n一、 性格語彙資料整理 52\n二、 語彙使用頻率統計與相似詞歸類 53\n三、 品牌性格語彙詞庫建構 57\n第四節 階段四:品牌性格語彙適合性調查 60\n一、 問卷題項設計 60\n二、 品牌性格語彙適合性調查 61\n第五節 階段五:品牌性格語彙與品牌配對 68\n一、 題項-產品類別配對 68\n二、 題項-品牌配對 69\n三、 品牌-題項配對 69\n四、 小結 70\n第六節 階段六:品牌性格調查 71\n一、 調查執行成果與說明 71\n二、 問卷調查結果與分析 73\n三、 本土品牌性格構面建立與檢證 77\n四、 小結 89\n第五章 結論與建議 91\n第一節 研究成果 91\n一、 品牌性格語彙詞庫建構 91\n二、 品牌性格本土化量表編製 92\n第二節 與Aaker品牌性格構面的比較 93\n一、 與Aaker美國品牌性格構面的比較 94\n二、 與Aaker日本品牌性格構面的比較 95\n三、 小結 97\n第三節 研究限制與建議 98\n第四節 行銷意涵 100\n參考文獻 101\n中文參考文獻 101\n西文參考文獻 103\n附錄一 案例分析:時報金犢獎第8~17屆 109\n附錄二 本研究產品類別與細項 111\n附錄三 知名品牌調查 113\n附錄四 品牌性格聯想調查 115\n附錄五 品牌性格語彙適合性調查(ABC綜合版) 125\n附錄六 品牌性格語彙與品牌配對表 135\n一、 題項-產品類別配對 135\n二、 題項-品牌配對 138\n三、 各題項的品牌配對數 143\n四、 各目標品牌的性格語彙(題項)配對數 145\n附錄七 品牌性格調查 149\n附錄八 控制品牌之各組共識程度分析結果 155\n附錄九 量表內部一致性分析結果 157\n附錄十 品牌性格本土化量表(正式版) 165\n一、 修正版-89題題項 165\n二、 純化版-37題題項 169\n附錄十一 本土品牌性格構面與Aaker性格構面對照表 173\n一、 與Aaker美國品牌性格構面之比較 173\n二、 與Aaker日本品牌性格構面之比較 176zh_TW
dc.format.extent124594 bytes-
dc.format.extent200709 bytes-
dc.format.extent743568 bytes-
dc.format.extent736234 bytes-
dc.format.extent910660 bytes-
dc.format.extent989190 bytes-
dc.format.extent558430 bytes-
dc.format.extent232105 bytes-
dc.format.extent1829057 bytes-
dc.format.extent75563 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0937520151en_US
dc.subject品牌性格量表zh_TW
dc.subject主位取向zh_TW
dc.subject基本語彙策略zh_TW
dc.subject本土化契合性zh_TW
dc.subjectbrand personality scaleen_US
dc.subjectemic approachen_US
dc.subjectfundamental lexical strategyen_US
dc.subjectindigenous compatibilityen_US
dc.title品牌性格本土化量表編製之初探zh_TW
dc.titleAn Exploratory Research on Development of Brand Personality Indigenous Questionnaireen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference中文參考文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院新聞局出版年鑑編輯委員會(2003)。行政院新聞局2003年出版年鑑。台北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院新聞局出版年鑑編輯委員會(2004)。行政院新聞局2004年出版年鑑。台北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院新聞局出版年鑑編輯委員會(2005)。行政院新聞局2005年出版年鑑。台北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳祉芸(2003)。兩岸品牌性格之跨文化比較- 以報紙廣告為例。國立政治大學企業管理研究所,未出版碩士論文,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference宋秩銘、莊淑芬、白崇亮、黃復華(1996)。奧美的觀點。台北市:滾石文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference宋維貞、張妙清、謝東(1996)。從心理測驗看華人性格:(二)測驗結果。曾文星主編,中國人的心理與治療。台北:桂冠圖書。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱皓政(2004)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。第二版。台北:五南圖書。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪瑞斌、劉兆明(2003)。工作價值觀研究之回顧與展望。應用心理研究,19,211-250。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張妙清、張建新、宋維貞(1996)。從心理測驗看華人性格:(一)量表的運用。曾文星主編,中國人的心理與治療。台北:桂冠圖書。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張春興(1993)。現代心理學。台北:東華書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部重編國語辭典編輯委員會(1981)。重編國語辭典(三版)。台北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部國語推行委員會(1998)。重編國語辭典修訂本(網路版)。取自教育部全球資訊網-線上電子辭典,網址:http://140.111.34.46/dict/.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莊耀嘉、李雯娣(2001)。兒童性格結構:五大模型的本土化檢驗。中華心理學刊,43:1,65-82。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許功餘、王登峰、楊國樞(2001)。臺灣與大陸華人基本性格向度的比較,本土心理學研究,16,185-225。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳俐琦(1998)。品牌性格構成向度之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所,未出版碩士論文,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃彤芸(2004)。品牌性格對品牌權益之影響-以麥當勞、肯德基及摩斯漢堡為例。國立政治大學企業管理研究所,未出版碩士論文,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃昭瑋(2005)。廣告圖片與文案內容一致性對廣告效果之影響:產品類別、人格類型與廣告設計調和效果之探討。元智大學國際企業學系,未出版碩士論文,桃園:中壢市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊國樞、李本華(1971)。五百五十七個中文人格特質形容詞之好惡度、意義度及熟悉度。國立台灣大學心理學系研究報告,13,36-57。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊國樞(1993)。我們為什麼要建立中國人的本土心理學。本土心理學研究,1,6-88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊國樞(1997)。心理學研究的本土契合性及其相關問題。本土心理學研究,8,75-120。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉光輝(2007)。性格心理學研究本土化之實踐與反思-從「文化-性格」關連建構本土化自我。上網日期:2008年5月1日。網址: http://www.psy.ntu.edu.tw/iopsy/press_center_content.asp?OnLineOrNot=1&tb_index=MT20071225175038。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭英輝(1997)。品牌性格與產品類別對品牌延伸評價的影響。國立中央大學企業管理研究所,未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧怡安(2002)。世代特性與其認知品牌性格之比較研究。國立政治大學企業管理學研究所,未出版碩士論文,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference西文參考文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity- Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAaker, D. A. (1996). Measurement Brand Equity Across Products and Markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAaker, J. L. (1995). Brand Personality: Conceptualization, Measurement and Underlying Psychological Mechanisms. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, U.S.Azh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347-356.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAaker, J., & Maheswaran, D. (1997). The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(3), 315-328.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAaker, J. L., Garolera, J., & Benet-Marinez, V. (2001). Consumption Symbols as Carriers of Culture: A Study of Japanese and Spanish Brand Personality Constructs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 492-508.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAllport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAshton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005). A Defence of the Lexical Approach to the Study of Personality Structure. European Journal of Personality, 19, 5-24.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBatra, R., Lehmann, D. R., & Singh, D. (1993). The Brand Personality Component of Brand Goodwill: Some Antecedent and Consequence. In David A. Aaker and Alexander L. Biel (Eds). Brand Equity and Advertising. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 83-96.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBelk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerry, J. W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4(2), 119-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBiel, A. L. (1992). How Brand Image Drive Brand Equity. Journal of Advertising Research, 32(6), 6-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBriggs, S. (1992). Assessing the Five-Factor Model of Personality Description. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 253-293.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBurger, J. M. (2008). Personality (7th). Belmont, CA: Thomson/ Wadsworth.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCaprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Guido, G. (2001). Brand Personality: How to Make the Metaphor fit? Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 377-395.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCattell, R. B. (1943). The Description of Personality: Basic Traits Resolved into Cluster. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476-506.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCattell, R. B. (1973). Personality Pinned Down, Psychology Today, 7, 40-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCosta, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDigman, J. M., & Inouye, J. (1986). Further Specification of the Five Robust Factors of Personality. Journal of Personality, 57, 195-214.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDigman, J. M. (1997). Higher-Order Factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and Cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263-287.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEntriquez, V. (1979). Towards Cross-cultural Knowledge through Cross- indigenous Methods and Perspectives. Hong Kong Psychological Society Bulletin, 3, 7-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEpstein, S. (1977). Trait and Alive and Well. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.). Personality at the Crossroads. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 83-98.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEvertt, J. E. (1983). Factor Comparability as a Means of Determining the Number of Factors and Their Rotation. Multivariance Behavioral Research, 18, 197-218.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEysenck, H. J. (1990). Biological Dimensions of Personality. In Lawrence. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and Research, New York: Guilford Press, 244-276.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFournier, S. (1998). Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 343-373.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGardner, B. B., & Levy, S. J. (1955). The Product and the Brand. Harvard Business Review, 33(2), 33-39zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGeason, J. A. (2002). Brand Personality Trait Marking Using Non-verbal Measurement. Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, U.S.A.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoldberg, L. R. (1992). The Development of Markers of the Big Five Factor Structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoldberg, L. R. (1993). The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits. American Psychologists, 48, 26-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGuilford, J. P. (2003). On personality. In Walter Mischel (Ed.), Introduction to personality: Toward and Integration, 7th Ed. (pp. 22-23). New York: Wiley.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHan, S., & Shavitt, S. (1994). Persuasion and Culture: Advertising Appeals in Individualistic and Collectivistic Societies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(4), 326-350.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHofstede, G. (1983). National Cultures in Four Dimensions- A Research-Based Theory of Cultural Differences among Nations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 13(1-2), 46-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill International, 1-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(Jan.), 1-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or Uniqueness, Harmony or Conformity? A Cultural Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 785-800.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1245-1267zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKleine, R. E., Kleine, S. S., & Kernan, J. B. (1993). Mundane Consumption and the Self: A Social-Identity Perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(3), 209-235.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLevy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for Sales. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117-124.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLin, C. A. (2001). Cultural Values Reflected in Chinese and American Television Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 30(4), 83-94.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMalhotra, N. K. (1988). Self Concept and Product Choice: An Intergrated Perspective. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 1-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMartineau, P. (1958). The Personality of the Retail Store. Harvard Business Review, 36(1), 47-55.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCraken, G. (1989). Who is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310-312.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorgan, D. L. (1998). Planning Focus Groups. Focus Group Kit V(2). CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMurphy, J. (1990). Brand Strategy. New York: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNorman, W. T. (1963). Toward an Adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attributes: Replicated Factor Structure in Peer Nomination Personality Ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOuwersloot, H., & Tudorica, A. (2001). Brand Personality Creation through Advertising. MAXX Working Paper Series.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePark, B. (1986). A Method for Studying the Development of Impressions of Real People. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 907-917.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePervin, L. A., Cervone, D., & John, O. P. (2005). Persnality: Theory and Research (9th). New York: John Wiley & Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePlummer, J. T. (1984). How Personality Makes a Difference. Journal of Advertising Research, 24(6), 27-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePlummer, J. T. (1985). Brand Personality: A Strategic Concept for Multinational Advertising, in Marketing Educators’ Conference. New York: Young & Rubicam, 1-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSaucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Lexical Studies of Indigenous Personality Factors: Premises, Products, and Prospects. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 847-879.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2005). Theories of Personality (8th). CA: Thomson/ Wadsworth.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShavitt, S. (1990). The Role of Attitude Objects in Attitude Functions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26 (2), 124-148zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSirgy, J. (1982). Self-Concept on Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287-300.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, E. E., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Ben, D. J., Fredrickson, B. L., Loftus, G., & Maren, S. (2003). Atkinson and Hilgard’s Introduction to Psychology. CA: Thomson/ Wadsworth.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYoon, C., Gutchess, A. H., Feinberg, F., & Polk, J. A. (2006). A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Neural Dissociations between Brand and Person Judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 31-40.zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
015101.pdf121.67 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
015102.pdf196 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
015103.pdf726.14 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
015104.pdf718.98 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
015105.pdf889.32 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
015106.pdf966.01 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
015107.pdf545.34 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
015108.pdf226.67 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
015109.pdf1.79 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
015110.pdf73.79 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.