Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33046
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor胡悅倫zh_TW
dc.contributor.author呂秋萍zh_TW
dc.creator呂秋萍zh_TW
dc.date2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T07:10:12Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T07:10:12Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T07:10:12Z-
dc.identifierG0919110121en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33046-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description教育研究所zh_TW
dc.description91911012zh_TW
dc.description93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究目的旨在探討國中教師甄選口試,背景變項(口試委員特徵、應試者特徵、應試者學經歷)及口試委員心理因素(應試者儀容舉止、應試者受喜愛程、應試者教師專業、口試委員類我效應),如何影響國中教師甄選口試評價結果以及這些因素與口試評價結果間的因果關係模式。\n本研究採用問卷調查法進行,研究工具為「口試評量表」。資料蒐集的對象以93年度台北縣、台北市及桃園縣擔任國中教師甄選之口試委員為對象。參與本研究之口試委員共78位,每位口試委員口試應試者的人數3至23人不等,共回收口試評量表883份,有效量表844份。每位口試委員填答之量表以10份作為本研究原始資料選取之基準,共選入有效量表570份進行資料分析。\n根據資料分析的結果,本研究獲致結論如下:(1)口試委員口試經驗、教育程度、職務,應試者教育背景、任教領域等背景變項對口試評價結果有顯著影響。(2)本研究建構之「國中教師甄選口試決策模式」,獲得實證資料驗證。模式中各心理因素對口試評價結果之總效果以口試委員類我效應最強,其餘依次是應試者受喜愛程度、應試者教師專業、應試者儀容舉止。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of my study aimed at investigating how the background variables (interviewer characteristics, applicant characteristics, the educational background and past experience of the applicants), the interviewer’s psychological factors (the appearance and behavior of the applicants, the likability of applicants, teacher specialty of the applicants, and the perceived similarity of the interviewer), influence the interview assessment of the teacher selection in junior high school. And how the relations of cause-effect modeling between those mentioned-above factors and the result of interview assessment are formed.\nThe survey is used and the instrument is the Interview Assessment Form. The objects of data-gathering are those who are the interviewers of junior high school teacher selection in Taipei County, Taipei City, or in Taoyuan County, in 2004. A total of 78 interviewers participate in my research, and each interviewer has 3 to 23 interviewees. Thus, a total of 883 Interview Assessment Forms are collected, 844 of which are effective forms. The average ten Assessment Forms answered by each interviewer are chosen as the standard of the choice of original data, and a total of 570 effective Assessment Forms are selected for data analysis.\nAccording to the result of data analysis, the conclusions of my research are as follows: (1) Such background variables as the interviewer’s interview experience, level of education, job position, the educational background of the applicants, and teaching fields have significant influences upon the result of interview assessment. (2) The decision model of the interview of junior high school teacher selection well developed in study is verified by well-examined data. From the analysis of Structural Equation Modeling, the strongest influence of the psychological factors upon the total effect of interview assessment is the interviewer’s perceived similarity, followed by the likability of applicants, teacher specialty of the applicants, and the appearance and behavior of the applicants.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論\n第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………………… 1\n第二節 研究問題………………………………………………………… 4\n第三節 名詞及變項定義………………………………………………… 5\n第四節 研究限制………………………………………………………… 7\n第二章 文獻探討\n第一節 真實口試與模擬口試…………………………………………… 9\n第二節 口試決策模式……………………………………………………10\n第三節 一般口試決策的因素與評分項目………………………………23\n第四節 國中教師甄選口試決策的因素與評分項目……………………29\n第三章 研究方法\n第一節 研究架構與假設…………………………………………………39\n第二節 研究對象…………………………………………………………43\n第三節 研究工具…………………………………………………………45\n第四節 實施程序…………………………………………………………51\n第五節 資料分析及統計方法……………………………………………52\n第六節 結構方程模式……………………………………………………53\n第四章 研究結果\n第一節 各研究變項的描述性統計………………………………………59\n第二節 口試委員特徵、應試者特徵、應試者學經歷對口試評價結果\n 影響之分析………………………………………………………62\n第三節 國中教師甄選口試決策模式分析………………………………72\n第五章 結論與討論\n第一節 本研究的主要發現………………………………………………93\n第二節 結論………………………………………………………………99\n第三節 討論…………………………………………………………… 102\n第四節 建議…………………………………………………………… 106\n參考文獻\n中文部分 ………………………………………………………………… 109\n英文部分 ………………………………………………………………… 110\n附錄\n附錄一 口試評量表初稿………………………………………………… 116\n附錄二 口試評量表……………………………………………………… 120\n附錄三 國中教師甄選口試決策假設模式SIMPLIS程式語法…………. 122zh_TW
dc.format.extent11492 bytes-
dc.format.extent12720 bytes-
dc.format.extent12264 bytes-
dc.format.extent11439 bytes-
dc.format.extent30720 bytes-
dc.format.extent94108 bytes-
dc.format.extent97272 bytes-
dc.format.extent115788 bytes-
dc.format.extent47943 bytes-
dc.format.extent29595 bytes-
dc.format.extent126234 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0919110121en_US
dc.subject教師甄選zh_TW
dc.subject口試zh_TW
dc.subject結構方程模式zh_TW
dc.subject類我效應zh_TW
dc.subjectteacher selectionen_US
dc.subjectinterviewen_US
dc.subjectstructural equation modelingen_US
dc.subjectperceived similarityen_US
dc.title國中教師甄選口試決策歷程之研究--以結構方程模式檢驗zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王家通、吳裕益(民75)。國中優良教師之特質及其背景研究。教育資料文摘,98,83-130。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院教育改革審議委員會(民85)。總諮議報告書。台北市:教育部。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱炳憲(民91)。應用模糊理論及分析層級程序法於國中教師甄試。國立中正大學數學研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳復新(民89)。面談的問題及其改進之道:兼評高考一級口試改革方案。空大行政學報,10,27-67。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳福春(民91)。國中教師甄試相關問題研究─以台南縣市為例。臺南師範學院教師在職進修教育行政碩士學位班碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李幸穗(民92)。應試者面談過程所呈現的訊息對面談評價的影響─以企業員工的招募甄選為實驗情境。國防大學國防管理學院後勤管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林育瑋(民89)。應徵者印象管理策略對甄選面談決策的影響。國立台灣科技大學管理研究所企業管理學程碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱皓政(民92)。結構方程模式。台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference范揚隆(民85)。微觀面試行為之研究。東海大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference修慧蘭(民82)。個人特質、非語言訊息與人際適應之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張明輝(民88)。學校教育與行政革新研究。台北:師大書苑。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃小鳳(民90)。性別角色刻板印象、晉升者性別及平權意識喚起對晉升決策的影響。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃芳銘(民93)。結構方程模式理論與應用。台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許崇憲(民92)。教師人數逐漸以女性為主流嗎?教育與心理研究,26(1),61-83。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊庭懿(民91)。應徵者印象管理策略對甄選面談決策之影響:以面談訓練為干擾變數。國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉連祺(民88)。我國中小學教師甄試之研究。教育資料文摘,39:6(233)44-64。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄧文慧(民85)。主管性別、應徵者性別與晉升潛能對甄選決定的影響。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference謝臥龍(民86)。優良國中教師特質之德懷術分析。教育研究資訊,5(3),14-28。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, N., & Shackleton, V. (1990). Decision making in the graduate selection interview:A field study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 63-76.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArvey, R.D. (1979). Unfair discrimination in Employment Interview: Legal and psychological aspects. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 736-765.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArvey, R.D., & Campion, J. E.(1982). The Employment Interview: A Summary and Review Recent Research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaron, R. A. (1983). Sweet smell of success ? The impact of pleasant artificial scents on evaluations of job applicant. Journal of Applied Psychology,68, 709-713.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaskett, G. D.(1973). Interview Decision as Determined by Competency and Attitude Similarity. Journal of Applied Psychology,57(3), 343-345.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBigoness, W. J. (1976). Effect of applicat`s sex, race, and performance on employers` performance ratings: Some additional findings. Journal of Applied Psychology,61, 80-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarlson, K. D., Connerley M. L., & Mecham III R. L. (2002)Recruitment evaluation: The case for assessing the quality of applicants attracted. Personnel Psychology, 55, 461-490.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, S. L., & Bunker K. A. (1975). Subtle effects of sex role stereotype on recruiter’ hiring decision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 566-572.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDelli, D. A., & Vera, E. M. (2003). Psychological and contextual influences on the teacher selection interview: A model for future research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17:2, 137-155.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDipboy, R. L., Fontenelle, G. A., & Garner, K. (1984). Effects of previewing the application on interview process and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology,69, 118-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDipboy, R. L., Fromkin, H. L., & Wiback, K. (1975). Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology,60, 39-43.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDougherty, T. W., Ebert, R. J., & Callender, G. C. (1986). Policy capturing in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 9-15.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGifford, R., Ng, C.F., & Wilkinson, M.(1985). Nonverbal cues in the employment interview:Links between applicant qualities and interviewer judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 729-736.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGilmore D. C., Beehr T. A., & Love K. G., (1986). Effects of applicant sex, applicant physical attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decision. Journal of Occupational Psychology,59, 103-109.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGorman, C. D., Clover, W. H., & Doherty, M. E. (1978). Can we learn anything about interviewing from “interviews” of paper people? Two studies of the external validity of a paradigm. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 165-192.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGraves, L. M. (1993). Sources of individual differences in interviewer effectiveness:A model and implication for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 349-370.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGraves, L. M., & Karren, R. J. (1992). Interviewer decision processes and effectiveness: An experimental policy-capturing investigation. Personnel Psychology, 45, 313-340.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGraves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1988). An investigation of sex discrimination in recruiters’ evaluations of actual applicants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 20-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGraves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1995). The effect of sex similarity on recruiters’evaluations of actual applicants: A test of the similarity-attraction paradigm. Personnel Psychology, 48, 85-98.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrove, D. A. (1981). A Behavioral consistency approach to decision making in employment selection. Personnel Psychology, 34, 55-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHaefner, J. E. (1977). Race, age, sex, and competence as factor in employee selection of the disadvantaged. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 199-202.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHamner, W. C., Kim, J. S., Baird, L., & Bigoness W. J. (1974). Race and sex as determinants of ratings by potential employers in a simulated work-sampling task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 705-711.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeenan, A. (1977). Some relationships between interviewers’ personal feelings about candidates and their general evaluation of them. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 50, 275-283.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLondon, M., & Poplawski, J. R. (1976). Effects of information on stereotype development in performance appraisal and interview contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 199-205.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarlowe, C. M., Schneider, S. L., & Nelson, C. E. (1996). Gender and Attractiveness Biases in Hiring Decisions: Are More Experienced Managers Less Biased? Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 11-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMotowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640-647.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOliphant, V. N., & Alexander, E. R. (1982). Reacts to Resumes as a Function of Resume Determinateness, Applicant Characteristics, and Sex of Raters. Personnel Psychology, 35, 829-843.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePeters, L. H., & Terborg, J. R.(1975). The effect of temporal placement of unfavorable information and of attitude similarity on personnel selection dw2ecisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 279-293.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePosner, B.Z. (1981). Comparing recruiter, student, and faculty perceptions of important applicant and job characteristics. Personnel Psychology,34, 329-339.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePowell G. N., & Butterfield D.A. (2002). Exploring the influence of decision makers` race and gender on actual promotions to top management. Personnel Psychology, 55, 397-428.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRand, T. M., & Wexely, K. N.(1975). Demonstration of the effect,”similar to me,”in simulated employment interview. Psychological Reports, 36, 535-544.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRaza, S. M., & Carpenter, B.N. (1987). A model of hiring decisions in real employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 596-603.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRynes, S., & Gerhart, B. (1990) Interviewer assessments of applicant `Fit`: an exploratory investigation. Personnel Psychology, 43, 13-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchmitt, N. (1976). Social and situational determinants of interview decision: Implications for employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 29, 79-101.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSinger, M. S., & Sewell, C. (1989). Applicant age and selection interview decisions: Effect of information exposure on age discrimination in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 42, 135-154.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilliam, A. C., Siegfried, D., & Pearce L. (1981). Forced attention to specific applicant qualifications; Impact on physical attractiveness and sex of applicant biased. Personnel Psychology, 34, 65-75.zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
11012101.pdf11.22 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
11012102.pdf12.42 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
11012103.pdf11.98 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
11012104.pdf11.17 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
11012105.pdf30 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
11012106.pdf91.9 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
11012107.pdf94.99 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
11012108.pdf113.07 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
11012109.pdf46.82 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
11012110.pdf28.9 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
11012111.pdf123.28 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.