Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33354
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor羅狼仁<br>林茂松zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorPhillips,Brian David<br>Lin,Maosungen_US
dc.contributor.author黃耀弘zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHuang,Yao-Hungen_US
dc.creator黃耀弘zh_TW
dc.creatorHuang,Yao-Hungen_US
dc.date2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T08:21:11Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T08:21:11Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T08:21:11Z-
dc.identifierG0925510031en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33354-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description英國語文學研究所zh_TW
dc.description92551003zh_TW
dc.description95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract《達文西密碼》這部作品在成為最暢銷的小說後,吸引了世界上許多各式各樣不同的讀者。然而在暢銷市場之外,這部作品卻被許多評論家認為是一部扭曲史實的作品;幾乎所有的評論家都一致認為這是一部充滿歷史錯誤與邏輯矛盾的創作。不過令人訝異的是,幾乎沒有任何評論家是從文學理論批評的角度來檢視這份虛擬的小說創作。 因此,本文除盡可能檢視過去所有探討及批評《達文西密碼》的文章外,筆者將探討文中引含的兩種能量:權力與抵抗。這兩種力量其實在此書中一直是兩股此起彼落的流動能量,筆者將採取文學理論的角度去探索此書裡的權力與抵抗互動脈絡;而且,在這之後,筆者會試著從理論面向,深入檢視造成《達文西密碼》一書全球風潮之因。\n 本論文將分作四個章節,在首章中,我會回顧其他批評及評論家對《達文西密碼》一書的見解,第二章則是對應用於此書中的文學理論的鋪陳及探討,第三\n章則是則分別討論傅科 (Michael Foucault) 的權力、克里多娃 (Julia Kristeav) 的母性抵抗,以及以瑟 (Wolfgang Iser) 的越界 (Boundary crossing ) 理論,如何運作在《達文西密碼》一書當中。最末章的總結則點出此本小說其實不僅僅\n是許多評論家眼中的一本充滿不實與問題的作品;相反的,它不但揭露出權力及抵抗兩種能量的運作和依存關係,而且也解釋了這本書造成閱讀風潮的原因,也就是讀者心中的那份永不滿足的失落。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractHaving been one of the most popular recent works of fiction, The Da Vinci Code has attracted readers throughout the world. Yet, many critics have commented that The Da Vinci code is a work full of historical mistakes. Almost no critic analyzes the reason for its success from a theoretical perspective. \n The novel enchants readers because it suggests the unexpected ways that the meaning of the sacred feminine has been repressed throughout history. As the reader decodes the clues that are hidden throughout the novel, an undiscovered history is suggested: the myth of the Holy Grail. In The Da Vinci Code, the Holy Grail stands for Mary Magdalene, who carried and conceived Jesus Christ’s child. In the novel Mary carries a significant symbolic meaning because she is portrayed as the wife of Jesus as well as the mother of His daughter. This stunning premise is responsible for making The Da Vinci Code not only popular, but also very controversial. Critics vary in their reaction to the ‘subversive’ ideas in The Da Vinci Code, but there are two predominant kinds of reaction to the novel. The first type reflects the view that The Da Vinci Code is a popular work that encourages feminine, independent thinking that works in opposition to conventional and social power. The second views it as a fictitious work fraught with historical inaccuracies. Generally speaking, both types mention the issues of power and resistance in The Da Vinci Code. \nThis thesis consists of four chapters that focus respectively on the search for power, feminine resistance, and boundary crossing narrative techniques. Chapter one introduces how critics analyze their conventional elements. In the second chapter, I intend to employ Michael Foucault, Julia Kristeva, and Wolfgang Iser’s theories in an analysis of The Da Vinci Code. In the third chapter, I will employ textual evidence to support my theoretical analysis. In the conclusion of my thesis, I will claim that only through the dialectic oscillation between transgression and law can the individual escape the symbolic control and discover resistance. Furthermore, the narrative technique of boundary crossing is the key that has made the book a runaway success throughout the world and that also renders the reader eager to explore their own world further. Finally I reach the conclusion that The Da Vinci Code is not merely a work full of errors and conspiracies, but also a novel that exposes the violence, resistance and sense of loss in contemporary society.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsPage\nAcknowledgements………………………………………………………………… iv\nChinese Abstract…………………………………………………………………… vi\nEnglish Abstract…………………………………………………………………….viii\nChapter One……………………………………..……………………………...........1\nChapter Two………………………………………………………………………...10 \nChapter Three…….………………………………………………………………....53\nChapter Four ……………..………………………………………………………..111\nBibliography……………………………………………………………………….116zh_TW
dc.format.extent49293 bytes-
dc.format.extent12820 bytes-
dc.format.extent105225 bytes-
dc.format.extent11635 bytes-
dc.format.extent42264 bytes-
dc.format.extent119417 bytes-
dc.format.extent159126 bytes-
dc.format.extent23070 bytes-
dc.format.extent41499 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0925510031en_US
dc.subject達文西密碼zh_TW
dc.subject丹布朗zh_TW
dc.subject傅科zh_TW
dc.subject權力zh_TW
dc.subject慾望zh_TW
dc.subject克莉斯提娃zh_TW
dc.subject抵抗zh_TW
dc.subject越界zh_TW
dc.subjectThe Da Vinci Codeen_US
dc.subjectDan Brownen_US
dc.subjectFoucaulten_US
dc.subjectPoweren_US
dc.subjectDesireen_US
dc.subjectKristevaen_US
dc.subjectResistanceen_US
dc.subjectBounary corssingen_US
dc.title丹‧布朗小說《達文西密碼》中的權力、抵抗與越界zh_TW
dc.titlePower, Resistance, and Boundary Crossing in Dan Brown`s The Da Vinci Codeen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceBarthes, Roland. The Pleasure of the Text. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Farrar,Straus, and Giroux,1975.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarker, Chris. Cultural Studies: Theories and Practice. Sage Publications, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBethune, Brian. “Cracking The Da VinCi Code.” Maclean’s 117 (2004): 36-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBernhauer, J. Michel Foucault’s Force of Flight: Toward an Ethics for Thought. London: Humanities Press International, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBock, Darrell L. Breaking The Da Vinci Code. Thomas Nelson, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBraidotti, R. Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. Trans. Elizabeth Guild, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrooker, Peter. A Concise Glossary of Cultural Theory. Arnold, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, Dan. The Da Vinci Code. Doubleday. 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBurstein, Dan. Et al. Secrets of the Code: The Unauthorized Guide to the Mysteries Behind The Da Vinci Code. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDe Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDiemert, Brain. “Pursuit of Justice: Graham Greene’s Refiguring of the Detective Story in It’s a Battlefild.” Paper on Language and Literature 30 (1994): 285- 297.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEasthope, Antony. Literature into Cultural Studies. London and New York, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEco, Umberto. Foucault’s Pendulum. Ballantine Books, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEhrman, Bart D. Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code. Oxford University Press, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFoucault, M. Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. A. Sheridan, New York: Vintage Books,1979.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference- - -. History of Sexuality. Pantheon Books, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGramsci, A. Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1968.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHull, Richard. “The Purloined Letter: Poe’s Detective Story V.S. Panoptic Foucauldian Theory.” Style, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHall, S. “For All on White: Metaphor of Transformation.” Critical Dialogue in Cultural Studies, London: Routlefge, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIser, Wolfgang. The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Baltimore: John Hopkins Up, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKantrowitz Barbara, et al. “The Bible’s Lost Stories.” Newsweek 142 (2003): 48-56zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKlinghoffer, David. “Religious Fiction.” National Review 55 (2003): 48-49zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKristeva, J. “Stabat Mater.” Tales of Love. Trans., Leon Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference- - -. The Kristeva Reader. ed. Tori Moi. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference- - -. Tales of Love. Trans. Leon Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference- - -. Desire in Language: The Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Ed. Léonzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoudiez. Trans. Alice Jardine, Thomas Gora and Léon Roudiez. New York, Columbia University Press, London, Basil Blackwell, 1980.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference- - -. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York : Columbia University Press, 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference- - -. Revolutionary in Poetic Language. Trans. Margaret Waller. Columbia University Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKulman, Linda, Jay Tolson, and Katy Kelly. “Jesus in America: Behind the Wild Success of a Theological Thriller Lies a Centuries-old Urge to Rapture the Original Jesus.” US. News & World Report 135 (2003).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLacy, Norris J. “The Da Vinci Code: Dan Brown and the Grail that Never was.” Arthuriana 14 (2004): 81-93.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLinhart, Robert. The Assembly Line. Trans. Margaret Crosland, London: John Calder, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMacherey, Pierre. “A Theory of Literary Production.” Reading Popular Narrative: A Source Book. Ed., Bob Ashley, Leicester University Press: London and Washington, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMakinen, Merja. Feminist Popular Fiction. New York: Palgrave, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCormick, Patrick “Painted out the Picture: Part of the Best-selling Appeal of Thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDa Vinci Code is a Conspiracy that Has Kept Women from Taking Their Rightful Place in the Church.” U.S. the Catholic 68(2003): 36-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcNay, Lois. Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender, and the Self. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcGuigan, J. Cultural Populism. London: Routledge, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcHale, Brain. Postmodernist Fiction. New York: Methuen, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMoretti, Franco. “Clues.” Signs Taken for Wonders: Essay in the Sociology if Literary Forms. Trans., Susan Fischer, David Forgacs, David Miller.Verso, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMiller, D. A. The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNealon, Jeffery T. “Work of the Detective, Work of the Writer.” Detecting Texts. Ed., Patricia Mervale, Susan Elizabeth. PENN, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNewman, Sharan. The Real History Behind The Da Vinci Code. Berkley Books, 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO’Grady, Kathleen. “An Interview with Kristeva.” Parallax 8 (1998):5-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOliver, Kelly. Reading Kristeva: Unraveling the Double-bind. Indiana University, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParry, Alan. “Deconstruction and Theory Revisited: Including the Excluded.” Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 20-24 August 1999. 1-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePederson-Krag, Geralding “Detective Stories and the Primal Scene.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 13 (1949):203-14.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePutnam, Bill, and John Edwin Wood. “Unravelling The Da Vinci Code: Bill Putman and John Edwin Wood Peel Away the Evidence to Find an Extraordinary Hoax at the Heart of Dan Brown’s Best Selling Novel.” History Today 55 (2005):18-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRolvsjord, Randi. “Music as a Poetic Language.” Online. Internet. 11 May. 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVoices: A World Forum for Music Therapy Retrieved. May 14, 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<http://www.voices.no/mainissues/mi40004000138.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSauer, Geoffrey. “Review of Foucault’s Pendulum.” Online. Internet. 12 Feb. 1990. The Modern World. Nov 20, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<http://www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_humanitas90.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchor, N. “Dreaming Dissymmetry: Barthes, Foucault, and Social difference.” Men in Feminism. Ed., A. Jardine and Paul Smith, New York : Routledge, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSeltzer, Mark. Henry James and the Art of Power. Ithaca: Cornell Up, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSheridan, Alan. Michel Foucault: The Will to Truth. Tavistock, 1980.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmart, Barry. Michel Foucault. Tavistock, 1985.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Philip. Cultural Theory: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSpanos, William V. Repetitions: The Postmodernism Occasion in Literature and Culture. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSwope, Richard. “Approaching the Threshold(s) in Postmodernism Detective fiction : Hawthrone’s ‘Wakefild’ and Other Missing Persons.” Critique 39 (1998): 207-228.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTodorov, Tzvetan. The Poetics of Prose. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1977.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWiliams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilliam, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana, 1976.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilson, Robert Anton. “Mary Mary, Quite Contrary.” Online. Internet. 16 Sep. 2004. Conspiracy Coincidence & Code. <http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:z6fTFkGUdM4J:maybelogic.org/coincidancecode/modules.php%3Fname%3DNews%26file%3Darticle%26sid%3D2+Roberto+Anton+Wilson,+The+Widow%27s+Son,+Magdalene&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=24>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference- - -. The Widow’s Son. New Falcon Publications, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilson-Smith, Anthony, “God and those Details.” Maclean’s 117 (2004): 4.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZizek, Slavoj. “Two Ways to Avoid the Real of Desire.” Looking Away: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Trough Popular Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992.zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
51003101.pdf48.14 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51003102.pdf12.52 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51003103.pdf102.76 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51003104.pdf11.36 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51003105.pdf41.27 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51003106.pdf116.62 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51003107.pdf155.4 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51003108.pdf22.53 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51003109.pdf40.53 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.