Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33362
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor萬依萍zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWang, I-Pingen_US
dc.contributor.author廖昭媛zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLiao, Chao-yuanen_US
dc.creator廖昭媛zh_TW
dc.creatorLiao, Chao-yuanen_US
dc.date2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T08:23:20Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T08:23:20Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T08:23:20Z-
dc.identifierG0088555008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33362-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description語言學研究所zh_TW
dc.description88555008zh_TW
dc.description91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract國 立 政 治 大 學 研 究 所 碩 士 論 文 摘 要\n\n研究所所別: 語言學研究所\n\n論文名稱:音位和音節在中文兒童語音扮演的角色:心理語言學實驗的驗證\n\n指導教授:萬依萍\n\n研究生:廖昭媛\n\n論文內容摘要:(共一冊,13,641字,分五章二十節,並扼要說明內容,共453字)\n\n本文目的是想瞭解兒童在聽辨語音相似性,對於音位和音節的敏感性。本研究的受試者是41位操持國語的學齡前兒童。其中二十一位兒童參與非詞語音分類實驗(the nonword classification task)。兒童首先要學習兩個雙音節的標準語音,然後他(她)要依據聽覺上的相似性來歸類稍候聽到的測試音。他們需要要判定測試音聽起和哪一個標準音聽起來比較相似。結果顯示兒童在音位相似性或是音節相似方面的表現並無顯著的差異。另外二十位兒童皆下來進行非詞語音聽辯的實驗(The word-pair judgment task 1 and 2)。在測試工作(一),兒童要聽辨一對兩個雙音節的非詞語音,在前面的部份聽起來是否相似。結果顯示,兒童在音位和音節相似性,音位和最多相性似上的表現皆有顯著的差異性。在測試工作(二),兒童也是要聽辨一對兩個雙音節的非詞語音,在後面的部份聽起來是否相似。實驗的結果和測試工作(一)相同。整體上而言,要解釋在兒童聽辯語音上的表現,除了從「數量」方面的考量,更可以從語音本身結構上上的差異性來討論兒童對與音位和音節的敏感性。此外,在本文的實驗裡,並未發現相似因的位置會造成兒童在聽辯語音上的差異。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAbstract\nThis paper investigated the role of syllables and phonemes in Mandarin speaking children in terms of the sensitivity to the syllable correspondences and phoneme correspondences. In the first experiment, the nonword classification task, 21 kindergarteners were recruited. The child had to learn two disyllabic standard sounds. Then, he/she was presented with a test nonword and had to classifiy the test nonword to one of the two standard sounds if the test sound and the standard sound are sounded alike at the beginnings. The results in the nonword classification task have shown that the young children did not show the significant reliance on the type of the syllable correspondences. In the two further experiments, the word-pair judgment task 1 and 2, another 20 kindergarteners were recruited. The children were asked to judge whether two test words are sounded alike at the beginnings. The results in the word-pair judgment task 1 indicate that syllables are treated as a structural unit and phonemes are belonging to the lower level of the syllabic constructs. The children’s responses tend to reflect the effect of the syllable structure in the language process rather than the effect of the size of shared units. In the word-pair judgment task 2, the child has to judge whether the two test words are sounded alike at the ends. The results also indicate that children’s performance should be viewed in terms of syllable structures. Besides, the location of the shared unit did not play a role when children judge the similarity between the speech sounds. Children performed equally the same when the shared units are either at the beginnings or at the ends of words in the present study.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTable of Contents\n Page\nAcknowledgements……...……………………………………………………………iv\nChinese Abstract…...………………………………………………………………...vii\nEnglish Abstract……………………………………………………………….…….viii\nChapter\n1. Introduction..………………………………………………………………1\n1.1 Background……………………………………………………………1\n1.2 Purpose…………………………………………………………….…..5\n1.3 Organization…………………………………………………………...6\n 2. Literature Review…...…………………………………………………..….7\n2.1 Phonological development on English speaking children…………..7\n2.2 Phonological development on Mandarin speaking children……….10\n2.2.1 The sketch in Mandarin phonology………………………………10\n2.2.1.1 Consonants……………………………………………………..10\n2.2.1.2 Vowels………………………………………………………….12\n2.2.1.3 Syllables………………………………………………………..12\n2.3 The development on infants’ speech perception…………………...15\n2.4 Early phonological representation………………………………….17\n2.5 Effect of the size of a unit………………………………………….19\n2.6 Theoretical views on syllable structures…………………………...20\n 3. The nonword classification task…...……………………………………...23\n 3.1 Subjects…………………………………………………………….26\n 3.2 Materials……………………………………………………………26\n 3.3 Procedure and scoring……………………………………………...30\n 3.4 Results and analysis ………………………………………….……32\n 4. The word-pair judgment tasks 1 and 2...…………………………….……35\n 4.1 The word-pair judgment task 1……………………………….……35\n 4.1.1 Subjects……………………………………………………..……36\n 4.1.2 Materials in the word-pair judgment task 1……………………...36\n 4.1.3 Procedure and scoring……………………………………………39\n 4.1.4 Results and analysis……………………………………………...40\n 4.2 The word-pair judgment task 2…………………………….………43\n 4.2.1 Subjects…………………………………………………….…….43\n 4.2.2 Materials in the word-pair judgment task 2……………………...44\n 4.2.3 Procedure and scoring……………………………………………47\n 4.2.4 Results and analysis……………………………………………...47\n 4.3 The multiple comparisons………………………………………….50\n 5. Discussion and conclusion……………...……………………….………..55\n 5.1 Discussion on the nonword classification task……………………..55\n 5.2 Discussion on the word-pair judgment task 1 and 2……………….58\n 5.2.1 The word-pair judgment task 1…………………………………..59\n 5.2.2 The word-pair judgment task 2…………………………………..63\n 5.3 Discussion on the multiple comparisons…………………………...66\n 5.4 Conclusion……………………………………………………….....68\nReferences…………………………………………………………………………....70zh_TW
dc.format.extent20768 bytes-
dc.format.extent23315 bytes-
dc.format.extent20264 bytes-
dc.format.extent33538 bytes-
dc.format.extent194366 bytes-
dc.format.extent121303 bytes-
dc.format.extent252773 bytes-
dc.format.extent60197 bytes-
dc.format.extent19595 bytes-
dc.format.extent72723 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088555008en_US
dc.subject音位zh_TW
dc.subject音節zh_TW
dc.subject兒童語言zh_TW
dc.subjectphonemesen_US
dc.subjectsyllablesen_US
dc.subjectchild phonologyen_US
dc.titleThe role of phonemes and syllables in child phonology: Evidence from psycholinguistic experiments in Mandarinzh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceReferenceszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAslin, R. N. & Linda .B. Smith. 1988. Perceptual development. Annual Review of Psychology 39. 435-73.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBertoncini, J. & J. Mehler. 1981. Syllables as units in infants speech perception. Infant Behavior and Development 4, 247-260.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlevins, J. 1995. The syllable in phonology theory. In John A. Goldsmith ed., The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 206-44. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrady, S., Fowler, A. & Gipstein, M. 1994. Questioning the role of syllables and rimes in early phonological awareness. Manuscript submitted for publication.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBruce, D.J. 1964. The analysis of word sounds. British Journal of Educational Psychology 34. 158-70.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBryan, P. E., M. MacLean, L. L. Bradley & J. Crossland. 1990. Rhymes and alliteration, phoneme detection and learning. Developmental Psychology 26. 429-38.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCheng, C.C. 1973. A synchronic phonology of Mandarin Chinese. The Huge: Mouton.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEimas, P.D., E. Siqueland, P. Jusczyk, & J. Vigorito. 1971. Speech perception in infants. Science 171. 303-06.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFerguson, C.A. 1973. Fricatives in child language acquisition. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, (Linguistic, Stanford University) 12. 97-104.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFerguson, C. A. 1978. Learning to pronounce: The earliest stages of phonological development in the child. In F. D. Minifie & L. L. Lloyd (eds.). Communicative and cognitive abilities: early behavioral assessment. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGleason, J. B. & N. B. Ratner. 1998. Language acquisition. In J. B. Gleason & N. B. Ratner (eds) Psycholinguistics. London: Harcourt Brace College Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHsu, J. 1987. A Study of the Various Stages of Development and Acquisition of Mandarin Chinese by Children in Chinese Milieu. NSC report.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIngram, D., L. Christensen, S. Veach & B. Webster. 1980. The acquisition of word-initial ficatives and affricates in English by children between 2 and 6 years. In Yeni-Komshian, Grace H., James F. Kavanagh, and Charles A. Ferfuson (eds.) Child phonology: Volume 1 production. New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJaeger, J. J. 1997. The acquisition of syllable structure: Evidence from slips of tonge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJakobson, R. 1941/1968. Child language, aphasia and phonological universals (Trans. A. Keiler, 1968). The Hague: Mouton.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJusczyk, P. W. 1986. Toward a model of development of speech perception. In J.S. Perkell & D. H. Klatt (eds.) Invariance and variability in speech processes.Hillsdal NJ: Erlbum.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJusczyk, P. W. 1987. Toward a model of the development of speech perception. In A. Allport, D. MakKay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (eds.) Language perception and production: Relationships between listening, speaking, reading and writing. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaycock, D. 1972. Towards a typology of ludlings, or play-languages (Linguistic Communications, Working papers of the Linguistic Society of Australia, Monash University) 6. 61-113.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLiberman, I. Y., D. Shankweiler, F. W. Fischer & B. Carter. 1974. Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 18. 201-212.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLin, Y. H. 1989. Autosegmental treatment of segmental phonology in Chinese phonology. Ph. D. dissertation. University of Texas at Austin.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMacken, M. A. 1979. Developmental reorganization of phonology: A hierarchy of basic units of acquisition. Lingua 49. 11-49.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMacken, M. A. 1980. Aspects of the acquisition of stop systems: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Yeni-Komshian, G. H., J. F. Kavanagh, and C.A. Ferfuson (eds.) Child phonology: Volume 1 production. New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMenn, L. 1983a. Development of articulatory, phonetic and phonological capabilities. In B. Butterworth (ed.) Language Production Vol. 2. London: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorais, J., L. Cary, J. Alegria & P. Bertelson. 1979. Does awareness of speech or a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition 7. 323-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorley, M. 1957. The development ad disorders of speech in childhood. London: Livingstone.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRead, C. 1991. Access to syllable structure in language and learning. In S.A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (eds.) Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 67-83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSingh, S., D.R. Woods & G.M. Becker. 1972. Perceptual structure of 22 prevocalic English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 52. 1698-1713.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSelkirk, E. 1982. The Syllable. In van der Hulst, Harris & N. Smith (eds.) The structure of phonological representations (part II). Foris Publications. 337-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShiu, H. 1990. The phonological acquisition by Mandarin-speaking children: A longitudinal study on children from nine months through three years old. M.A. Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSingh, S., D.R. Woods & G.M. Becker. 1972. Perceptual structure of 22 prevocalic English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 52. 1698-1713.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStark. Rachel E. 1980. Stages of speech development in the first year of life. InYeni-Komshian, G. H., J. F. Kavanagh, and C. A. Ferfuson (eds.) Child phonology: Volume 1 production. New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStuddert-Kennedy, Michael. 1987. The phoneme as a perceptuomotor structure. In A. Allport, D. Mackay, W. Prinz & E. Scheerer (eds.) Language perception and production: Relationship between listening, speaking, reading and writing. Orlando: FL: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSu, A. 1985. The acquisition of Mandarin phonology by Taiwanese Children. M.A. Thesis. Fu Jen Catholic University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTemplin, M. 1957. Certain language skills in children: Their Development and interrelationships. Institute of Child Welfare Monograph 26. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTreiman, R. & J. Baron. 1981. The phonemic analysis ability: Development and relation to reading ability. In Waller, T.G. & G. E. Mackinnon (eds.), Reading Research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTreiman, R. & A.M. Breaux. 1982. Common phoneme and overall similarity relations among spoken syllables: Their use by children and adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 11. 581-610.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTreiman, R. 1985. Onsets and rimes as units of spoken syllables: evidence form children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39. 161-81.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTreiman, R. & A. Zukowski. 1991. Levels of phonological awareness. In S.A. Brady & D.P. Shankweiler (eds.) Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 67-83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTreiman, R & A. Zukowski. 1996. Children’s sensitivity to syllables, onsets, rimes and phonemes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 61. 193-215.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWan, I.P. 1997. The status of prenuclear glides in Mandarin Chinese: evidence from speech errors. Chicago Linguistic Society 33. 417-428.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWan, I.P. 1999. Mandarin phonology: evidence from speech errors. Ph.D. dissertation. SUNY-Buffalo.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWan, I.P. 2002. On the representation and processing of the prenuclear glides in Mandarin. Proceedings of the 7th international and 19th national conferences on Chinese Phonology.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, N. M., Fei, P., Huang, H., & Chen, C. W. 王南梅、費珮妮、黃恂、陳靜文等著. 1984. 三歲至六歲學齡前兒童國語語音發展結構. 《聽語會刊》,Vol.1, 12-17.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWalley, A.C. 1993. The role of vocabulary Development in children’s spoken word recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review13. 286-350.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWaterson, P. 1971. Child phonology: A prosodic review. Journal of linguistics 7. 179-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWerker, J. & R.C. Tees. 1984. Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development 7. 49-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYopp, H.K. 1988. The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly 23. 159-77.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
55500801.pdf20.28 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500802.pdf22.77 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500803.pdf19.79 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500804.pdf32.75 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500805.pdf189.81 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500806.pdf118.46 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500807.pdf246.85 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500808.pdf58.79 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500809.pdf19.14 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500810.pdf71.02 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.