Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33397
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor何萬順zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorHer, One-soonen_US
dc.contributor.author鄧敦弘zh_TW
dc.creator鄧敦弘zh_TW
dc.date2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T08:28:35Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T08:28:35Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T08:28:35Z-
dc.identifierG0915550111en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33397-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description語言學研究所zh_TW
dc.description91555011zh_TW
dc.description93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本論文旨在描述並嘗試以優選詞彙功能語法理論(OT-LMT)處理雅美語的論旨角色與語法功能的連結。雅美語的論旨角色與語法功能連結呈現出作格語言的特性,以致跟中文或英文有很大的差別。並且雅美語的連結又受到了焦點系統的影響,所以更加的複雜。現存的連結理論無論是以變換語法理論為基礎或以詞彙語法為基礎的,似乎都無法很直接簡潔的描述雅美語。本論文嘗試架構一個以優選理論為基礎的新連結模型,並且除了將之使用在雅美語上之外,也同時以這個新的模型來處理中文和英文中的連結。由於優選理論具有彈性的特性,這三種語言不同的連結模式,都可以被包含在這個新的模型當中。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis thesis studies the problem of argument-function linking in Yami and makes the fundamental claim that linking in Yami shows an ergative pattern, quite different from that in accusative languages, such as Mandarin and English. The linking phenomenon in Yami is complicated by its special voice system. Existing linking theories do not account for Yami straightforwardly. In trying to find a framework that can handle the Yami data, we find the flexibility of Optimality Theory a promising solution. The first part of this thesis is a description of the argument-function linking pattern in Yami and the proper place of the voice system is also discussed. And then we review several grammatical theories on linking. Both transformation-based theories and lexicalist theories are examined. We will demonstrate how these theories fail to account for linking in Yami in a straightforward manner. Thus we provide an optimality-theoretic account based on the lexical mapping theory of Lexical-Functional Grammar. This newly developed framework is applied not only to the Yami data but also to the relevant Mandarin and English data. It is claimed that this framework can accommodate all three different languages.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcknowledgements……………………………………………………iv\nTable of Contents……………………………………………………v\nChinese Abstract……………………………………………………vii\nEnglish Abstract……………………………………………………viii\nCHAPTER\n1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………1\n 1.1 Background……………………………………………………1\n 1.2 Motivation of the thesis…………………………………5\n 1.3 Purpose of the thesis ……………………………………6\n 1.4 Data collection and methodology………………………7\n 1.5 Organization of this thesis………………………………8\n 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE YAMI LINKING……………………………10\n 2.1 Introduction………………………………………………10\n 2.2 The voice system in Yami………………………………10\n 2.2.1 Case system of Yami………………………………11\n 2.2.2 Voice markers………………………………………14\n 2.3 Case and grammatical functions………………………19\n 2.3.1 Evidence for the nominative elements as\n subjects………………………………………………20\n 2.3.2 Evidence supporting the genitive nominal as\n the object……………………………………………24\n 2.4 Argument- function linking patterns in Yami………28\n 2.5 Summary………………………………………………………31\n3. PREVIOUS THEORIES……………………………………………………33\n 3.1 Introduction…………………………………………………34\n 3.2 Tranformation-based theories……………………………35\n 3.2.1 Basic mechanism………………………………………35\n 3.2.2 Guilfoyle, Hung, and Travis………………………37\n 3.3 Lexicalist theories………………………………………40\n 3.3.1 Lexical Mapping Theory……………………………40\n 3.3.2 Simplified LMT………………………………………43\n 3.4 Optimaility Theory-based account………………………50\n 3.5 Summary………………………………………………………55\n4. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION……………………………………………57\n 4.1 Introduction…………………………………………………57\n 4.2 OT-LMT…………………………………………………………58\n 4.3 The new model………………………………………………65\n 4.3.1 The problems of the constraints in OT-LMT……65\n 4.3.2 A revised OT-LMT……………………………………67\n 4.4 Discussion……………………………………………………76\n 4.4.1 Motivations for the constraints and rankings…76\n 4.4.2 Prediction about markedness………………………78\n5. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………80\n 5.1 Summary ………………………………………………………80\n 5.2 Accusative versus ergative………………………………80\n 5.3 A new OT-LMT model…………………………………………84\n 5.4 Limitations and suggestions for further research…87\n 5.5 Concluding remarks…………………………………………88\nREFERENCES…………………………………………………………………90zh_TW
dc.format.extent45028 bytes-
dc.format.extent81043 bytes-
dc.format.extent13743 bytes-
dc.format.extent61802 bytes-
dc.format.extent27858 bytes-
dc.format.extent67877 bytes-
dc.format.extent123770 bytes-
dc.format.extent137324 bytes-
dc.format.extent29605 bytes-
dc.format.extent20211 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0915550111en_US
dc.subject優選理論zh_TW
dc.subject雅美語zh_TW
dc.subject優選詞彙映照理論zh_TW
dc.subject南島語zh_TW
dc.subject論旨角色與語法功能連結zh_TW
dc.subjectOptimailty Theoryen_US
dc.subjectYamien_US
dc.subjectOT-LMTen_US
dc.subjectAutronesian languageen_US
dc.subjectArgument-function linkingen_US
dc.titleArgument-Function Linking in Yami:An Optimality-Theoretic Accountzh_TW
dc.title雅美語的論旨角色與語法功能連結:以優選理論分析zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAissen, Judith. 1999. Markedness and subject choices in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17. 673-711.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBittner, Maria and Ken Hale. 1996. The structure determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry. 27.1:1-68.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBresnan, Joan. 1994. Locative inversion and the architecture of universal grammar. Language 70.72-131.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBresnan, Joan. 2000. Optimal syntax. Optimality Theory: Phonology, syntax and acquisition, ed by Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw and Jeroen van de Weijer, 334-385. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-Functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBresnan, Joan and Annie Zaenen. 1990. Deep unaccusativity in LFG. Grammatical relations: a cross-theoretical perspective, ed by K. Dziwirek, P. Farrell and E. M. Bikandi, 45-57. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications/Stanford Linguistics Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBresnan, Joan and J. M. Kanerva. 1989. Loctive inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20.1-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceButt, Miriam, Mary Dalrymple, and Anette Frank. 1997. An architecture for linking theory in LFG. The Proceedings of the LFG `97 Conference, ed by Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King. University of California, San Diego.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarnie, Andrew. 2002. Syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChang, Yung-li. 1997. Voice, case and agreement in Seediq and Kavalan. Ph.D. Dissertation, National Tsing-Hua University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChang, Clair Hsun-huei. 2000. Yami reference grammar. Taipei: Yuen Liu.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceComrie, Bernard. 1988. Passive and voice. Passive and voice, ed by Masayoshi Shibatani, 9-23. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDowty, D. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67.547-619.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFalk, Yehuda N. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGault, JoAnn. 1997. Thoughts concerning ergativity, subject and focus in Sama Bangingi’. Selected papers from the 8ICAL. 393-422.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGilbert, Dicky and Helen de Hoop. 1998. Conflicting constraints: An introduction to Optimaility Theory. Lingua 104.1-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGuilfoyle E, H. Huang, and L.Travis. 1992. Spec of IP and Spec of VP: two subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11.45-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHer, One-soon. 2003. Chinese inversion constructions with a simplified LMT. Lexical-Functional Grammar analysis of chinese, Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph, No. 19, ed by A.Botomo and K. Luke.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHer, One-soon. 2005. Optimality-theoretic lexical mapping theory: A case study of locative inversion. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, Vol 2.1zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHo, Arlene Yue-ling. 1990. Yami Structure: A Descriptive Study of the Yami Language. M.A. Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHolmer, Arthur. 2001. The ergativity parameter. Lund unversity linguistic department working papers 48.101-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHopper, P. and Sandra Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56.2.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeenan, Edward L. 1976. Toward a Universal Definition of “Subject”. Subject and topic, ed by Charles N. Li. London: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeenan, Edward L. and Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistics Inquiry 8.63-99.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKroeger, Paul R. 1993. Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Dissertations in Linguistics. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLegendre, Geraldine, William Raymond, and Paul Smolensky. 1993. An optimality-theoretic typology of case and grammatical voice systems. Proceedings of BLS 19, 464-478.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLi, Paul Jen-kuei. 1997. A syntactic typology of Formosan Languages – Case markers on nouns and pronouns. Typological studies of languages in China. Symposium series of the Institute of History and Philology, No. 4, 443-477. Academia Sinica.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLiao, Hsiu-chuan. (2004). Transitivity and ergativity in Formosan and Philippine languages. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hawai’i.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLødrup, Helge. 1999. Linking and optimaility in the Norwegian presentational focus construction. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22.205-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMaclachlan, Anna. 2002. Optimailty and three western Austronesian case systems. Language universals and variation, ed by Mengistu Amberber and Peter Collins, 155-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceManning, Christopher. 1995. Ergativity: Argument structure and grammatical relations. Paper presented in LSA 95.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarantz, A. P. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorimoto, Yukiko. 1999. An optimality account of argument reversal. The Proceedings of the LFG `99 Conference, ed by Miriam Butt and Tracy King. University of Manchester, UK, July 19-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePaul, Ileana M. 2000. Malagasy clause structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, McGill University. .zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePhillips, Collin. 1995. Ergative subjects. Grammatical relations: theoretical approaches to empirical questions, ed by Clifford S. Burgess, Katarzyna Dziwirek and Donna Gerdts. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrince, Alan and P. Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. RuCCS Technical Report #2. Piscateway, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRau Der-Hwa V. and Ma-nyu Tung. to appear. Tao dictionary: reference grammar, texts, and dictionary. Language and Linguistics Monograph. Taipei: Academia Sinica.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReid, Lawrence A. and Hsiu-chuan Liao. 2004. A brief syntactic typology of Philippine languages. Special Issue of Language and Linguistics 5 (2):433–490zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchachter, Paul. 1976. The subject in Philippine languages: topic, actor, actor-topic or none of the above. Subject and topic, ed by C. Li, 491-518. New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchachter, Paul and Fe T. Otanes. 1972. Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSells, Peter. 1998. The function of voice markers in the Philippine Languages. Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, ed by Steven Lapointe et al., 111-137. Stanford: CSLI Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSells, Peter. ed. 2001. Formal and empirical issues in optimality-theoretic Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShibatani, Masayahi. 1988. Voice in Philippine languages. Passive and Voice, ed by Masyahi Shibatani, 85-142.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStarosta, Stanley. 2002. Austronesian “focus” as derivation: evidence from nominalization. Language and Linguistics 3.2.427-79.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTung, Ma-nyu and Der-Hwa V. Rau. 2000. Yami Texts. Taipei: Crane.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWechsler, Stephen and I Wayan Arka. 1998. Syntatic ergativity in Balinese: An argument structure based theory. Natural language and linguistic theory 16. 387-441zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYami New Testament. 1994. Taipei: The Bible society in the R.O.C.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, Shan-shan. (2004). An ergative view of Thao syntax. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Hawai’i.zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
55011101.pdf43.97 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55011102.pdf79.14 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55011103.pdf13.42 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55011104.pdf60.35 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55011105.pdf27.21 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55011106.pdf66.29 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55011107.pdf120.87 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55011108.pdf134.11 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55011109.pdf28.91 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55011110.pdf19.74 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.