Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33413
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor莫建清zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorMo , Chien-chingen_US
dc.contributor.author許國鋒zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHsu , Kuo-fengen_US
dc.creator許國鋒zh_TW
dc.creatorHsu , Kuo-fengen_US
dc.date2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T08:32:08Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T08:32:08Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T08:32:08Z-
dc.identifierG0088951016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33413-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description88951016zh_TW
dc.description92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在探討「以常用詞根輔以圖像構詞式詞彙教學法」、「常用詞根無圖像構詞式詞彙教學法」及傳統的「詞義說明式詞彙教學法」在學生的詞彙記憶上的差異;本研究亦探討學生的英文詞彙量、構詞察覺度、短期記憶、長期記憶及拼詞能力之間的相關。\r\n 本研究的主要發現如下:接受「以常用詞根輔以圖像構詞式詞彙教學法」的學生比接受「常用詞根無圖像構詞式詞彙教學法」及傳統的「詞義說明式詞彙教學法」的學生表現出更好的構詞察覺度、短期記憶、長期記憶及拼詞能力。在這三組中,構詞察覺度較高的學生對生詞有較佳的短期記憶與長期記憶能力,反之亦然;在詞彙記憶方面,短期記憶力較佳則長期記憶力也是較佳,反之亦然;並且,一星期後的後測分數比較高的學生在一個月後的後後測分數也會比較高;再者,詞彙的短期記憶與學生英文詞彙量的差異無關,因為學生所記住的生詞都可以持續短暫的時間,但不一定能長久記憶。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to investigate the discrepancy in the use of the iconic-morphological approach via commonly-used roots, the non-iconic morphological approach via commonly-used roots, and the traditional definition-based teaching method in vocabulary memorization. It also explores the correlation between English vocabulary size, awareness of morphology, short-term memory for words, long-term memory for words, and vocabulary spelling abilities.\r\n The subjects of this study are 91 third-year students studying at the National Overseas Chinese Experimental Senior High School in Taipei County. They received instruction in the iconic-morphological approach via commonly-used roots, the non-iconic morphological approach via commonly-used roots, and the traditional definition-based teaching method, respectively. In the beginning, the three groups took the same pre-test to examine their vocabulary size. Then, subjects were immediately asked to take post-test 1 to examine their awareness of morphology after receiving different instructions. Later, subjects were asked to memorize forty unknown words within twenty minutes and then to take post-test 2 to investigate their short-term memory for words. A week later, post-test 3 was held to check their long-term memory for words. A month later, they sat for post-test 4, used to explore their longer-term memory for the forty words.\r\n In conclusion, the study summarizes the main findings pertinent to the proposed research questions. The students who receive instruction in the iconic-morphological approach via commonly-used roots finally develop higher awareness of morphology, better short-term memory for words, better long-term memory for words, and better spelling ability than those who learn in the traditional definition-based approach or in the non-iconic morphological approach via commonly-used roots. Among the three groups, the students who display higher awareness of morphology have better short-term memory and long-term memory for words, and vice versa. Moreover, those who have better short-term memory have better long-term memory, and vice versa; those who have better one-week long-term memory for words definitely have better one-month long-term memory for words. Interestingly, students can learn words by rote for a short period of time regardless of their vocabulary size. That is, one person’s short-term memory for words is not correlated with his vocabulary size.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv\r\nTABLE OF CONTENTS v\r\nLIST OF TABLES viii\r\nCHINESE ABSTRACT ix\r\nENGLISH ABSTRACT x\r\n\r\nCHAPTER\r\n1. INTRODUCTION 1\r\n1.1 Background and Motivation 1\r\n1.2 Problems of the Study 2\r\n1.3 Purpose of the Study 4\r\n1.4 Research Questions 5\r\n1.5 Significance of the Study 6\r\n1.6 Organization 6\r\n\r\n2. LITERATURE REVIEW 8\r\n2.1 The Importance of Vocabulary Teaching 9\r\n 2.1.1 Necessity of Vocabulary Teaching 9\r\n 2.1.2 Vocabulary Processing and Vocabulary Instruction 10\r\n2.2 The Intralexical Factors in Vocabulary Teaching 12\r\n 2.2.1 Phonemic Features 12\r\n 2.2.2 Semantic Features 13\r\n 2.2.3 Morphological Features 14\r\n 2.2.3.1 Three Models of Morphologically-based Word Analysis 16\r\n 2.2.3.2 Frequency and Familiarity of Morphemes 16\r\n 2.2.3.3 Developmental Changes of Morphemes 18\r\n2.3 Vocabulary Teaching Strategies 19\r\n 2.3.1 Traditional definition-based Vocabulary Teaching 21\r\n 2.3.2 Vocabulary Teaching in Context 23\r\n 2.3.3 Key-Word Vocabulary Teaching 24\r\n 2.3.4 Morphologically-based vocabulary Teaching 26\r\n 2.3.4.1 The Application of Morphologically-based Orthographical Similarity 26\r\n 2.3.4.2 The Application of Polysemous Core-meaning 28\r\n2.4 Theoretical Framework of Vocabulary Teaching 29\r\n 2.4.1 Neurological Bimodality Learning and Visual Aids 29\r\n 2.4.2 An Iconic-Morphological Approach via Commonly-used Roots 31\r\n\r\n3. METHODOLOGY 35\r\n3.1 Subjects 35\r\n3.2 Instruments 36\r\n3.3 Three Different Teaching Approaches 38\r\n 3.3.1 The Traditional Definition-based Vocabulary Teaching Method 38\r\n 3.3.2 The Non-iconic Morphological Approach via Commonly-used Roots 39\r\n 3.3.3 The Iconic-Morphological Approach via Commonly-used Roots 40\r\n 3.4 Procedures 41\r\n 3.5 Data Analysis 42\r\n\r\n4. RESULTS AND FINDINGS 44\r\n4.1 Results 44\r\n4.2 Findings 61\r\n\r\n5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 64\r\n5.1 Discussion 64\r\n 5.1.1 The Responses of the Subjects 64\r\n 5.1.2 The Role of the Teacher 65\r\n 5.1.3 The Instruction of Background Knowledge of Etymology 66\r\n5.2 Conclusion 67\r\n 5.2.1 Pedagogical Implication 67\r\n 5.2.2 Recommendations for Further Research 71\r\n\r\nAPPENDIX A 73\r\nAPPENDIX B 76\r\nAPPENDIX C 78\r\nAPPENDIX D 80\r\nAPPENDIX E 82\r\nAPPENDIX F 84\r\nAPPENDIX G 94\r\nAPPENDIX H 104\r\nAPPENDIX I 108\r\nAPPENDIX J 109\r\nAPPENDIX K 110\r\n\r\nREFERENCES 111zh_TW
dc.format.extent51811 bytes-
dc.format.extent46318 bytes-
dc.format.extent69452 bytes-
dc.format.extent47363 bytes-
dc.format.extent47822 bytes-
dc.format.extent48422 bytes-
dc.format.extent71586 bytes-
dc.format.extent253021 bytes-
dc.format.extent124775 bytes-
dc.format.extent139650 bytes-
dc.format.extent75411 bytes-
dc.format.extent724354 bytes-
dc.format.extent167720 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088951016en_US
dc.subject圖像zh_TW
dc.subject構詞zh_TW
dc.subject常用詞根zh_TW
dc.subject詞彙短期記憶zh_TW
dc.subject詞彙長期記憶zh_TW
dc.subject構詞察覺度zh_TW
dc.subjecticonicen_US
dc.subjectmorphologyen_US
dc.subjectcommonly-used rootsen_US
dc.subjectshort-term memory for wordsen_US
dc.subjectlong-term memory for wordsen_US
dc.subjectawareness of morphologyen_US
dc.titleAn Iconic-morphological Approach via Commonly-used Roots to English Vocabulary Teaching: How to Help Chinese Senior High School Students Memorize English Vocabularyzh_TW
dc.titlenoneen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAltarriba, J., & Mathis, K. M. (1997). Conceptual and lexical development in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 36, 550-568.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAusubel, D. P., & Robinson, F. G. (1969). School Learning: An introduction to educational psychology. New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta, Dallas, Montreal, Toronto, London, Sydney: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, INC.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAvila, E., & Sadoski, M. (1996). Exploring new applications of the keyword method to acquire English vocabulary. Language Learning, 46(3), 379-395.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarcroft, J. (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52(2), 323-363.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBeauvillain, C. (1994). Morphological structure in visual word recognition: Evidence from prefixed and suffixed words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9 (3), 317-339.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBeauvillain, C. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole-word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language 35, 801-820.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. 4th ed. London and New York: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCaramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297-332.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarlisle, J. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologicallyzh_TW
dc.relation.referencecomplex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 12, 169-190.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarney, R. N., & Levin, J, R. (1998). Coming to terms with the keyword method in introductory psychology: A “neuromnemonic” example. Teaching of Psychology, 25(2), 132-134.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNagy, W., Anderson, R. C., Schommer, M., Scott, J. A., & Stallman, A. C. (1989). Morphological families in the internal lexicon. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 268-282.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNaron, N. K. (1978). Developmental changes in word attribute utilization for organization and retrieval in free recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 25, 279-297.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNassaji, H. (2003). Higher-level and lower-level text processing skills in advanced ESL reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 261-276.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNation, I. S. P. (1982). Beginning to learn foreign vocabulary: A review of the research. RELC Journal, Vol. 13, No. 1, 14-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNation, K., Marshall, C. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). Phonological and sematnic contributions to children’s picture naming skill: Evidence from children with developmental reading disorders. Language And Cognitive Processes, 16(2/3), 241-259.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNation, P., & Coady, J. (1988). Vocabulary and reading. In R. Carter and M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp.97-110). London and New York: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNattinger, J. (1988). Some current trends in vocabulary teaching. In R. Carter and M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp.62-82). London and New York: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNelson-Herber, J. (1986). Expanding and refining vocabulary in content areas. Journal of Reading, 626-633.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNeuman, S. B., Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2001). Phonological awareness in young children. Early Childhood Today, 15(6), 11-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOney, B., Peter, M., & Katz, L. (1997). Phonological processing in printed words recognition: Effects of age and writing system. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 65-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarr, E., & Wixson, K. K. (1986). Guidelines for evaluating vocabulary instruction. Journal of Reading, 588-595.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePastizzo, M. J., & Feldman, L. B. (2002). Does prime modality influence morphological processing? Brain and Language 81, 28-41.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePlass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90, No. 1, 25-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePressley, M. (1977). Children’s use of the keyword method to learn simple Spanish vocabulary words. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 69, No. 5, 465-472.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePressley, M., & Levin, J. R. (1978). Developmental constraints associated with children’s use of the keyword method of foreign language vocabulary learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 26, 359-372.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrice, M., & Finkelstein, A. (1994). Pictures improve memory of SAT vocabulary words. Journal of Reading, Vol. 38, No. 2, 134-135.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrince, P. (1996). Second language vocabulary learning: The role of context versus translations as a function of proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 478-493.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRaimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, 229-258.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRaptis, H. (1997). Is second language reading vocabulary best learned by reading? Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(3), 566-580.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRichards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 1, 77-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoelofs, A. (1996). Serial order in planning the production of successive morphemes of a word. Journal of Memory and Language 35, 854-876.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChang, J. (1998). A study of Taiwanese students’ language learning styles and their relationship to EFL proficiency. The Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching in ROC, 133-142.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRueckl, J. G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C. S., & Mars, F. (1997). Morhological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language 36, 382-405.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSandra, D. (1994). The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9 (3),227-270.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSaville-Troike, M. (1984). What really matters in second language learning for academic achievement? TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 2, 199-219.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18, 55-88.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchneider, V. I., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E. (2002). What is learned under difficult conditions is hard to forget: Contextual interference effects in foreign vocabulary acquisition, retention, and transfer. Journal of Memory and Language 46, 419-440.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSeamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., Schwartz, M. A., Jones, K. J., Lee, D. M., & Jones, S. J. (2002). Repetition can have similar or different effects on accurate and false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 46, 323-340.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSharkin, B., Mohr, P., & Glover, J. A. (1983). Word obscurity and acoustic similarity in the use of the keyword mnemonic. The Journal of General Psychology, 1983, 109, 247-253.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSharon QI, & Rollanda, O. (2000). Comparison of phonological training procedures in kindergarten classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 226-233.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSingson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000) The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 12, 219-252.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, P. T. (1995). Are morphemes really necessary? In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp.365-382). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChannell, J. (1988). Psycholinguistic considerations in the study of L2 vocabulary acquisition. In R. Carter and M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp.83-96). London and New York: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStahl, S. A. (1986). Three principles of effective vocabulary instruction. Journal of Reading, 662-668.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStorkel, H. L. (2001). Learning new words: phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1321-1337.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSwaffar, J. (1995). Review by Swaffar. Language Learning, 45(1), 177-179.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, Vol. 7(4), 263-272.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological process. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9 (3), 271-294.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14, 638-647.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThelen, J. N. (1986). Vocabulary instruction and meaningful learning. Journal of Reading, 603-609.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThomas, D. G., Campos, J. J., Shucard, D. W., Rammsay, D. S., & Shucard, J. (1981).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSemantic comprehension in infancy: A signal detection analysis. Childzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDeveopment, 52, 798-803.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChen, C. Y. (1999). The implications for sound symbolism on vocabulary teaching. The Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on English Teaching in ROC, 615-625.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThomas, M. H., & Wang, A. Y. (1996). Learning by the keyword mnemonic: looking for long term benefits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2(4), 330-342.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTinkham, T. (1997). The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. Second Language Research, 13(2), 138-163.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTsai, Shu-hwa. (1999). Chinese EFL college students’ Chinese and English lexical encoding. Thesis. National Kaohsiung Normal University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTussing, A. A., & Greene, R. L. (1999). Differential effects of repetition on true and false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 520-533.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTwaddell, F. (1973). Vocabulary expansion in the TESOL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 7, 61-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUberti, H. Z., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2003). Keywords make the difference: Mnemonic instruction in inclusive classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(3), 56-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVachek, J. (1935). Several thoughts on several statements of the phoneme theory. American Speech, 5(4), 243-255.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9(4), 325-329.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWagner, R. K. (1986) Phonological processing abilities and reading: Implications for disabled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(10), 623-630.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, A. Y., & Thomas, M. H. (1995). Effect of keywords on long-term retention: Help or hindrance? Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 87, No. 3, 468-475.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCheng, Heng-shung, Chang, Hhu-huei, Cheng, Hu-shiou, & Ku, Ieng-shiou (2002). An English reference word list for SAET and DRET. Taipei: CEEC.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, Jeng-jeng (1997). Chinese students’ strategies for guessing word meanings in context. Research Papers in linguistics and Literature of National Taiwan Normal University, 6, 111-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWard J. (1999). How large a vocabulary do EAP Engineering Students need? Reading in a Froeign Language, 12(2), 309-323.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWesche, M. B., & Paribakht, T. S. (2000). Reading-based exercises in second language vocabulary learning: An introspective study. The Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 196-213.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWhite, T. G., Power, M. A., & White, S. (1989). Morphological analysis: Implications for teaching and understanding vocabulary growth. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 283-304.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWood, C. (2002). Orthographic analogies and phonological priming effects. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(2), 144-159.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWoodard, C. (1998). When rote learning fails against the test of global economy. Christian Science monitor, 90, 7-9.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYu, chin-ying (1998). Gaining vocabulary incidentally while reading by EFL senior high school students in Taiwan. Thesis. National Kaohsiung Normal University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998) The development of spelling-sound relationships in a model of phonological reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(2/3), 337-371.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZutell, J. (1998). Word sorting: a developmental spelling approach to word study for delayed readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14, 219-238.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9 (3), 341-368.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChialant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Where is morphology and how is it processed? The case of written word recognition. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp.55-76). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCoates, R. (1999). Word structure. London and New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCole, P., Segui, J., & Taft, M. (1997). Words and morphemes as units for lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 37, 312-330.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCondus, M. M., Marshall, K. J., & Miller, S. R. (1986). Effects of the keyword mnemonic strategy on vocabulary acquisition and maintenance by learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(10), 609-613.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCornu, A. M. (1979). The first step in vocabulary teaching. Modern Language Journal, 63, 262-272.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCornwall, A. (1992). The relationship of phonological awareness, rapid naming and verbal memory to severe reading and spelling disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(8), 532-538.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1994). Ways with words-Chinese students learning of English vocabulary. The Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on English Teaching, English Teachers’ Association, 15-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCronin, V., Pratt, M., Abraham, J., Howell, D., Bishop, S., & Manning, A. (1986). Word association and the acquisition of reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1-11.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCrow, J. T., & Quigley, J. R. (1985). A semantic field approach to passive vocabulary acquisition for reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 3, 497-513.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCunningham, P. M. (1998). The multisyllabic word dilemma: Helping students build meaning, spell, and read “big” words. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14, 189-218.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDanesi, M. (1988). Neurological bimodality and theories of language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 10, No. 1, 13-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDe Jong, P. F., & Van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(1), 51-77.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDenning, K., & Leben, W. R. (1995). English vocabulary elements. New York: Oxford University press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDerwing, B. L., Smith, M. L., & Wiebe, G. E. (1995). On the role of spelling in morpheme recognition: Experimental studies with children and adults. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp.3-28). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDixon, M., & Stuart, M. (2002). Phonological awareness improves word recall. Literacy Today, 20.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDole, J. A., Sloan, C., & Trathen, W. (1995). Teaching vocabulary within the context of literature. Journal of Reading, 38, 452-460.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEverson, M. E. (1998). Word recognition among learners of Chinese as a Foreign Language: Investigating the relationship between naming and knowing. The Modern Language Journal, 82(2), 195-203.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222-241.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFeldman, L. B., & Prostko, B. (2002). Graded aspects of morphological processing: Task and processing time. Brain and Language 81, 12-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFischler, I., & Bloom, P. A. (1979). Automatic and attentional process in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 1-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFoil, C. R., & Alber, S. R. (2002). Fun and effective ways to build your students’ vocabulary. Intervention In School And Clinic, 37(3), 131-139.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFreyd, P., & Baron, J. (1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21, 282-295.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1991). Forgetting recognition memory with and without recollective experience. Memory and Cognition, 19, 617-623.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGardner, M. K., Rothkope, E. Z., Lapan, R., & Lafferty, T. (1987). The word frequency effect in lexical decision: Finding a frequency-based component. Memory and Cognition, 15(1), 24-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1986). Relations between semantic and cognitive development in the one-word stage: The specificity hypothesis. Child Development, 57, 1040-1053.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoswami, U. (1991). Learning about spelling sequences: The role of onsets and rimes in analogies in reading. Child Development, 62, 1110-1123.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3, 375-406.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGraves, M. F., & Prenn, M. C. (1986). Costs and benefits of various methods of teaching vocabulary. Journal of Reading, 596-602.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGruneberg, M. M. (1998) A commentary on criticism of the keyword method of learning foreign languages. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 529-532.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHaggard, M. R. (1986). The vocabulary self-collection strategy: Using student interest and world knowledge to enhance vocabulary growth. Journal of Reading, 634-649.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHammill, D. D., Mather, N., Allen, E. A., & Roberts, R. (2002). Using semantics, grammar, phonology, and rapid naming tasks to predict word identification. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(2), 121-136.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHarmon, J. M. (1998). Vocabulary teaching and learning in a seventh-grade literature-based classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 41(7), 518-529.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHasher, L., & Clifton, D. (1974). A developmental study of attribute encoding in free call. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 17, 332-346.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHay, J. (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics, 39-6, 1041-1070.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHell, J. G. V., & Mahn, A. C. (1997). Keyword mnemonics versus rote rehearsal: Learning concrete and abstract foreign words by experienced and inexperienced learners. Language Learning, 47(3), 507-546.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHenriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 21, No. 2, 303-318.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHiga, M. (1965). The psycholinguistic concept of “difficulty” and the teaching of foreign language vocabulary. Language Learning, Vol. ХV, No. 3 & 4, 167-178.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHildreth, G. (1961). Teaching reading: A guide to basic principles and modern practices. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHirsh, D., & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language, 8(2), 689-696.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHoffman, P. R., & Norris, J. A. (2002). Phonological assessment as an integral part of language assessment. American Journal of Speech –Language Pathology, 11, 230-235.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHopkins, G., & Bean, T. W. (1999). Vocabulary learning with the verbal-visual word association strategy in a native American community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(4), 274-281.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuang, T. L. (1997). A study of the necessity of vocabulary teaching. The Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., LTD.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHulstijn, J. H., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 327-339.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHung, Chien-lian (1991). Teaching vocabulary to nonnative speakers at three levels. Paper presented at the Ninth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China. 155-171.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIacobelli, M. (1941). The semantic discipline. The Saturday Review of Literature, 14, 16-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJacoby, L. L., & Goolkasian, P. (1973). Semantic versus acoustic coding: Retention and conditions of organization. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12, 324-333.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJames, W. (1952). The principles of psychology. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, INC.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohnson, B. E. (1994). The reading edge. 2nd ed. Taiwan: Bookman Books, LTD.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohnson, D. D., & Johnson, B. V. H. (1986). Highlighting vocabulary in inferential comprehension instruction. Journal of Reading, 622-625.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJullian, P. (2000). Creating word-meaning awareness. ELT Journal, Vol. 54/1, 37-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKang, Sook-hi. (1995). The effects of a context-embedded approach to second-language vocabulary learning. System, Vol. 23, No. 1, 43-55.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKaren, I. (1991). Enhancing long-term retention of new vocabulary using visual images. Thesis. Nova University. (ED 336741).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKlein, D. E., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language 45, 259-282.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKnight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 285-299.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKoda, K. (1989). Effects of L1 orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, 201-222.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 440-464.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaffey, D. G., & Laffey, J. L. (1986). Vocabulary teaching: An investment in literacy. Journal of Reading, 650-656.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaudanna, A., Burani, C., & Cermele, A. (1994). Prefixes as processing units. Language and Cognitive Process, 9(3), 295-316.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaufer, B. (1986). Possible changes in attitude towards vocabulary acquisition research. IRAL, Vol. ХХІV/1, 69-75.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaufer, B. (1990a). Ease and difficulty in vocabulary learning: Some teaching implications. Foreign Language Annals, 23, No. 2, 147-155.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaufer, B. (1990b). Why are some words more difficult than others? – some intralexical factors that affect the learning of words. IRAL, Vol. ХХVШ/4, 293-307.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaufer, B. (1991). Some properties of the foreign language learner’s lexicon as evidence by lexical confusions. IRAL, Vol. ХХІХ/4, 317-330.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLawson, M. J. & Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary-learning strategies of foreign-language students. Language Learning, 46(1), 101-135.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLayton, L., Deeny, K., Upton, G., & Tall, G. (1998). A pre-school training program for children with poor phonological awareness: effects on reading and spelling. Journal of Research in Reading, 21(1), 36-52.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLehrer, A. (1990). Polysemy, conventionality, and the structure of the lexicon. Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 207-246.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLevin, J. R., & Kaplan, S. A. (1972). Imaginal facilitation of paired-associate learning: A limited generation? Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 63, No. 5, 429-432.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLi, En-ling. (1998). A study of the effects of word analysis on vocabulary teaching and learning in senior high school. Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLipka, S. (2002). Reading sentences with a late closure ambiguity: Does semantic information help? Language And Cognitive Processes, 17(3), 271-298.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLisbeth, Dixon-krauss. (2002). Using literature as a context for teaching vocabulary. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(4), 310-318.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLorsbach, T. C. (1982). Individual differences in semantic encoding processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15(8), 476-480.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 12, 191-218.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMaiguashca, R. U. (1993). Teaching and learning vocabulary in a second language: Past, present, and future directions. The Canadian Modern Language Review, Vol. 50, No. 1, 83-100.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMartin, A. V. (1976). Teaching academic vocabulary to foreign graduate students. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 1, 91-97.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Mushinski Fulk, B. J. (1990). Teaching abstract vocabulary with the keyword method: Effects on recall and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(2), 92-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226-232.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching & Linguistics: Abstracts, 221-246.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeunier, F., & Segui, J. (1999). Morphological priming effect: The role of surface frequency. Brain and Language, 68, 54-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMiller, G. A., & Gildea, P. M. (1987). How children learn words. Scientific American, 257, 94-99.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMo, Chien-ching (1993). The sound changes of roots and the teaching of English vocabulary. Journal of National Cheng-chi University, 66, 63-112.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMo, Chien-ching (1995). The role of English morphophonemic rules in spelling teaching. Paper presented at the Ninth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China, 173-210.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMonroe, E. E., & Orme, M. P. (2002). Developing mathematical vocabulary. Preventing School Failure, 46(3), 139-142.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304-330.zh_TW
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
95101601.pdf50.6 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101602.pdf45.23 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101603.pdf67.82 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101604.pdf46.25 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101605.pdf46.7 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101606.pdf47.29 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101607.pdf69.91 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101608.pdf247.09 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101609.pdf121.85 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101610.pdf136.38 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101611.pdf73.64 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101612.pdf707.38 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101613.pdf163.79 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.