Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33427
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor林啟一zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorLin, Chi-yeeen_US
dc.contributor.author林素美zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLin, Su-meien_US
dc.creator林素美zh_TW
dc.creatorLin, Su-meien_US
dc.date2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T08:34:00Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T08:34:00Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T08:34:00Z-
dc.identifierG0090951020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33427-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description90951020zh_TW
dc.description94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在調查九年一貫課程實施後,台北縣市國中英語教科書的使用現況及國中英語教師對這些教材的意見。\r\n  本研究主要探討的為:(1)國中英語教師選用新版教科書時所強調的標準,(2)各校英語教科書的評選委員與評選程序,(3)國中英語教師對新版英語教科書的滿意度與意見,包括學生習作與教師手冊,(4)更換教科書的原因與結果。\r\n  研究對象為五十七所國中的兩百五十三位英語教師。根據問卷調查,目前台北縣市的國中英語教科書有六個版本。\r\n  根據資料分析,得到以下主要的發現:\r\n1. 在選教材時,英語教師所秉持的標準依序為合乎課程標準,教材內容,主題多元性,字彙數量,活動設計,插圖,版面,教師手冊,出版商的售後服務、聲望,教科書的第一印象,出版商為教師舉辦的研習,作者的學識等。\r\n2. 各校的評選委員主要由英文老師組成,大多數學校評選教科書的程序為瀏覽各版本教科書,邀請出版商舉辦說明會,及舉行評選會議 。\r\n3. 根據本研究所收集的資料顯示,大多數教師普遍上皆滿意九年一貫課程的新版教科書,但約有一半的教師認為內容太多、太難是他們所遭遇到的最大問題。\r\n4. 根據所收集的資料顯示,有五所學校在第二學期更改教科書。教師們對第一學期所用的教科書不滿意的主要原因為教材內容非常難,內容組織不佳,及課與課之間缺乏連貫性。在更換新教科書後,大部分教師發覺之前教材所衍生的問題都解決了。因此大多數教師在更改教科書後覺得較滿意。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to survey English textbook selection of junior high schools in Taipei City and Taipei County after the implementation of the Nine-year Integrated Curriculum and explore English teachers` opinions of these textbooks.\r\n This study focuses on the following issues: (1) the criteria highlighted by English teachers when evaluating the new textbooks, (2) the committees and the procedure of English textbook selection in each school, (3) the junior high school English teachers` satisfaction with and opinions about the contents of the new teaching materials, including students’ workbooks and teachers` manuals, (4)the reasons for teachers’ changing textbooks and its consequences.\r\n The recruited subjects are 253 junior high school English teachers from 57 schools. According to the questionnaires, there are 6 versions of textbooks used in junior high schools in Taipei City and Taipei County.\r\n After data analysis, the main findings are obtained as follows:\r\n1.The criteria highlighted by English teachers when selecting the new textbooks are the correspondence to the curriculum standards, the contents, and a variety of themes. Considered important in sequence to the teachers who responded are the amount of vocabulary, the design of activities, the illustrations, the layout, the content of the teacher’s manual, and the level of service offered by the publisher, the publisher’s reputation, the first impression of the textbook, workshops provided for teachers by a publisher and the expertise of authors.\r\n2.The selection committee in each school is mainly composed of the English teachers and the selection of English textbooks in most schools are done in the procedure of reviewing textbooks, inviting publishers to present their textbooks, and holding selection meetings.\r\n3.According to the questionnaires collected in this study, most teachers were generally satisfied with the new textbooks developed for the Nine-year Integrated\r\n Curriculum. The most obvious problem with these new textbooks, according to the questionnaires, is that about half of the English teachers` dissatisfication with too much and too difficult content in the material.\r\n4.Based on the questionnaires, five of the schools change textbooks in the second semester. The main reasons for the dissatisfaction with the first semester textbooks are that the textbooks are overly difficult, poorly organized, and lacking in continuity between lessons. After changing to new textbooks, most teachers find that the problems are solved. Therefore, most teachers are more satisfied after changing the textbooks.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcknowledgements…………………………………………………………iii\r\nChinese Abstract……………………………………………………………x\r\nEnglish Abstract…………………………………………………………xi\r\nChapter\r\n 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………1\r\n 1.1 Background………………………………………………………1\r\n 1.2 Motivation………………………………………………………2\r\n 1.3 Purpose of the Study…………………………………………4\r\n 1.4 Significance of the Study…………………………………4\r\n 1.5 Research Questions……………………………………………5\r\n 1.6 Limitation of the study………………………………………6\r\n 2. Literature Review…………………………………………………7\r\n 2.1 The Nine-year Integrated curriculum……………………7\r\n 2.2 Writing Principles of the English Textbooks in the\r\n Nine-year Integrated curriculm…………………………8\r\n 2.2.1 Communicative Language Teaching…………………10\r\n 2.2.2 The Philosophy of Whole Language Teaching……13\r\n 2.3 Textbook Selection…………………………………………14\r\n 2.3.1 Textbook Selection Committee……………………15\r\n 2.3.2 The Procedures of Textbook Selection………15\r\n 2.3.3 The criteria of textbook selection……………16\r\n 2.4 Textbook Evaluation…………………………………………20\r\n 2.4.1 Principles of Textbooks Evaluation………………21\r\n 2.4.2 Checklists for Textbooks Evaluation……………22\r\n 3. Research Method…………………………………………………25\r\n 3.1 Instruction……………………………………………………25\r\n 3.2 Subjects………………………………………………………25\r\n 3.3 Instruments……………………………………………………29\r\n 3.3.1 Questionnaire for English Teachers………………29\r\n 3.3.2 Interview Questions for English Teachers………33\r\n 3.4 Procedures……………………………………………………35\r\n 3.5 Data Analysis…………………………………………………36\r\n 4. Results………………………………………………………………37\r\n 4.1 Instruction……………………………………………………37\r\n 4.2 Results…………………………………………………………37\r\n 4.2.1 Teachers’ Personal Background…37\r\n 4.2.2 Perceptions of Different Evaluation Criteria…40\r\n 4.2.3 Evaluation Process and Adoption of Textbooks..41\r\n 4.2.4 Teachers` Opinions on the Current English\r\n Textbook......................................46\r\n 4.2.5 Current Textbooks vs. Previous Textbooks……92\r\n 4.2.6 Results from the Interview with the\r\n Teachers…………………… 99\r\n 5. Discussion and Conclusion…………………………………104\r\n 5.1 Teachers’ Criteria on Textbook Selection…………104\r\n 5.2 English Textbook Selection Committees………………105\r\n 5.3 Textbook Selection Procedures…………………………107\r\n 5.4 Teachers’ Satisfaction with New Textbooks…………109\r\n 5.5 Changing Textbooks and Its Consequences……………109\r\n 5.6 Teaching Implications……………………………………109\r\n 5.7 Suggestions for Further Research……………………111\r\nAppendixes\r\n I. Questionnaire………………………………………………………114\r\nII. Interview Questions……………………………………………120\r\nReferences……………………………………………………………121zh_TW
dc.format.extent50408 bytes-
dc.format.extent83205 bytes-
dc.format.extent35355 bytes-
dc.format.extent88101 bytes-
dc.format.extent93463 bytes-
dc.format.extent1105699 bytes-
dc.format.extent46552 bytes-
dc.format.extent128066 bytes-
dc.format.extent161310 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090951020en_US
dc.subject九年一貫課程zh_TW
dc.subject康軒版教科書zh_TW
dc.subject南一版教科書zh_TW
dc.subject翰林版教科書zh_TW
dc.subject朗文版教科書zh_TW
dc.subject何嘉仁版教科書zh_TW
dc.subject基本學力測驗zh_TW
dc.subjectNine-year Integrated Curriculumen_US
dc.subjectKang-Hsuan textbooken_US
dc.subjectNan-I textbooken_US
dc.subjectHan-Lin textbooken_US
dc.subjectLongman textbooken_US
dc.subjectHess textbooken_US
dc.subjectthe Basic Competence Testen_US
dc.title二00三年國中英語新版本的教科書評量zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAllwright, R. (1978). Abdication and responsibility in language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2-(1), 105-121.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAllwright, R. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36 (1), 5-18.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, G. S. (1984). A whole language approach to reading. Lanham, MD:University Press of America.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, H. Douglas. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum—a systematic approach tozh_TW
dc.relation.referenceprogram development. Massachusetts: Heinle& Heinle Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBreen, M. P. and Candlin C. N. (1987) Which materials?: A consumer’s and designer’s guide. In Sheldon, E. (ed.), ELT Textbooks and Materials.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCanale, M. (1983). Communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication (pp.2-27). New York: Longmanzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCanale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChambers, F. (1997). Seeking consensus in coursebook evaluation. ELT Journal, 51 (5), 29-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChang, Y. L. (1996). Discussion on children’s English teaching and learning principles. Caves English Teaching, 10, 9-15.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChastain, K. (1988). Developing second-language skills: Theory and practice. Florida:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHarcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChen C.T. (2002). Textbook selection for senior high school students in Greater Taipei area. MA, Graduate Institute of English, National Taiwan Normal University, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCunningworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. London:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEeinemann.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCunningworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinmann.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDubin, F. , & Olsbtain, E. (1986). Course design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceForrester, J. W. (1970). Understanding the counter-intuitive behavior of social systems’ in The Open Systems Group, in Systems Behavior (3rd ed.), 1981. London: Paul Chapman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFreeman, Y. S., & Freeman, D. E. (1992). Whole language for second language learners. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGall, M. D. (1981). Handbook for evaluating and selecting curriculum materials. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGary, P.D. (1992). Consumers of textbooks: Concerns from the classroom. In John G. H. (Eds.), The textbook controversy: Issues, aspects and perspectives (pp. 137-145). US: Ablex Publishing Corporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGini, Carol Sisco. (2000). “Whole Language─Integrating the skills with young learners.” The Conference on the Training of Elementary School EFL Teachers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoodman, K. (1986). What’s whole in whole language. Portsmouth, N. H.: Heinemann. Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. New York: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHowatt, A. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford Universityzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePress.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHutchinson, T. & Torres, E. (1994). The textbooks as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315-328.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHymes, D. (1971). On communicative competence, Philadelphia, University ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePennsylvania Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohns, A. M. (1985). Some principles of materials design of the world around us. TESOL Newsletter 19:1,7.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohnosn, K. (1983). Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford: Pergamon.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLarsen-Freeman, D. (1982). The what of second language acquisition. In Hines &zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRutherford, (Eds.), On TESOL, 107-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLiao, X. (1996). Chinese Learners’ Communicative Incompetence: Causes andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSolutions. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 400 684.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKoh, L. (1992). From Base to Action: Bridging the Gap between Language andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCommunication Textbooks and the Professional World. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 400 684.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMinistry of Education (2004). General guidelines of Grade 1-9 Curriculum ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceelementary and junior high school education … English version. Ministry of Education.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMuther, C. (1985). What every textbook evaluator should know. Education Leadership, 42(7), 4-8.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNunan, D. (1989). The learner-centered curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRichards, J. C., and Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaaches and methods in language teaching.New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRichards, J. C., and Rodgers, T. (1987). Method: Approach, design and Procedure. In M. H. Long & J. C. Richards (eds.). Methodology in TESOL: A book of readings. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRivers, W. (1981). Teaching foreign language skills (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSavignon, S. J. (1983). Communicative competence: theory and classroom practice─texts and contexts in second language learning. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSheldon, Leslie E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42 (4), 237-246.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSheldon, Leslie E. (ed.) (1987). ELT textbooks and materials: Problems in evaluation and Development. Oxford: Modern English Publicationszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSkierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and evaluation. In M, Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (2nd ed.). (pp. 432-453). New York: Heinle and Heinle.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTandlichova, E. (1995). Coursebook evaluation in teacher training in Slovakia. MLT, 4, 47-65.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaylor, B. P. (1983). Teaching ESL: Incorporating a communicative, student-centered component. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 69-88.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThompson, G. (1996). Some misconceptions about communicative language teaching. ELT Journal, 50(1), 9-15zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTulley, M. & Farr, R. (1990). Textbook evaluation and selection. In D. L. Elliott& A. Woodward (eds.), Textbooks and schooling in the United States (pp. 162-177). Chicago: The national society for the study of education.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilkins, D. (1976). Notional Syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilkins, D. (1985). Some issues in communicative language teaching and their relevance to the teaching of languages in secondary schools. In K. Johnson & D.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePorter (eds.). Perspectives in communicative language teaching. London: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilliams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT Journal, 37 (3),251-255.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYalden, J. (1989). Principles of course design for language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中文參考書目zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張祝芬 (民83 年)。國中教科書選用制度之研究。台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference施玉惠 (民 89 年)。國小英語教材之評審—資格審vs 選用審。第十七屆中華民國英語文教學研討會論文集。台北:文鶴。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張碧玲 (民89年)。 國民中學英語教師對溝通式教學觀之信念研究。台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部(MOE)。 2001a。 國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要:語文學習領域。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部(MOE)。 2001a。 國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要:六大議題。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部(2004)。九年一貫課程。2004年2月17日,取自//teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/brief1.phpzh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
95102001.pdf49.23 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95102002.pdf81.25 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95102003.pdf34.53 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95102004.pdf86.04 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95102005.pdf91.27 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95102006.pdf1.08 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95102007.pdf45.46 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95102008.pdf125.06 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95102009.pdf157.53 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.