Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34142
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor陳彩稚zh_TW
dc.contributor.author黃慧琳zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHuang,Hui Linen_US
dc.creator黃慧琳zh_TW
dc.creatorHuang,Hui Linen_US
dc.date2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-18-
dc.date.available2009-09-18-
dc.date.issued2009-09-18-
dc.identifierG0095358005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34142-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description風險管理與保險研究所zh_TW
dc.description95358005zh_TW
dc.description96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究主要探討我國企業對產品責任保險需求之原因,分別以四個構面來分析企業對產品責任保險的需求。包括企業經營動機、公司背景資料、產品安全風險管理與上市公司財務特性等四方面來探討企業的投保動機。本研究以我國上市公司為樣本,共計發放440份問卷,並以回收的90份問卷進行Logistic迴歸及複迴歸之實證分析。\n研究結果發現,企業交易對象(買方)的要求、產品風險理財因素和產品市場行銷因素為影響上市公司投保產品責任保險之決定因素,呈顯著正向關係。另外,當上市公司過去曾發生過產品損害事件時,對產品責任保險之需求愈高;而且當公司的產品銷售本國地區、美加地區或同時銷售國內外地區時,對產品責任保險需求愈高。至於產品安全風險管理與產品責任保險需求之間的關係,實證結果顯示二者為互補關係,此與Ehrilich and Becker(1972)的理論假設一致。除此之外,本研究發現當公司規模愈大、產品銷售量愈大、負債對業主權益比率愈高以及公司無長期負債時,其對於產品責任保險的需求愈高。此外,當上市公司的財務危機成本愈高以及所面臨的損失頻率與幅度愈大時,其對於產品責任保險需求愈高。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the corporate demand for product liability insurance in Taiwan. The motivations to purchase product liability insurance can be categorized into four groups, business operation incentive, features of the firm, product safety management, and financial management. The decision of insurance is analyzed based on the logistic model and multivariate regression models with a sample of 90 publicly traded companies in Taiwan.\nThe empirical results of this study indicate that customers’ requests, product risk financing, and product marketing are the determinants for companies to buy product liability insurance. Further, the companies with previous experience of product liability losses have higher product liability insurance demand. Those companies selling their products to North America and Taiwan will purchase more product liability insurance. Moreover, the empirical evidences suggest significantly positive correlation between product safety management and product liability insurance demand, which is consistent with Ehrilich and Becker (1972) that market insurance and self-protection are complements. The results also show that the firm will purchase more product liability insurance when it has larger firm size, greater product sales, higher debt to equity ratio, and no long term debt.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄 I\n表目錄 III\n圖目錄 V\n第一章 緒論 1\n 第一節 研究動機 1\n 第二節 研究目的 3\n 第三節 研究範圍 3\n 第四節 研究流程 4\n第二章 文獻探討 5\n 第一節 產品責任保險之發展 5\n 第二節 產品責任制度之發展 13\n 第三節 產品責任風險之探討 18\n 第四節 產品責任之風險管理 20\n 第五節 企業投保產品責任保險之原因 24\n第三章 研究方法 30\n 第一節 研究架構 30\n 第二節 研究假設 31\n 第三節 研究模型 33\n 第四節 研究變數之定義與資料來源 35\n 第五節 資料分析方法 40\n第四章 實證研究分析 43\n 第一節 敘述統計分析 43\n 第二節 差異性分析 50\n 第三節 因素分析 53\n 第四節 Logistic迴歸分析 56\n 第五節 複迴歸分析 58\n第五章 未來展望 62\n 第一節 美國產品責任賠償之概況 62\n 第二節 風險管理措施之複迴歸分析 69\n 第三節 上市公司未投保產品責任保險之原因 72\n 第四節 上市公司對強制投保產品責任保險之看法 73\n第六章 結論與建議 76\n 第一節 研究結論 76\n 第二節 研究建議 78\n參考文獻 80\n附錄一 問卷 85zh_TW
dc.format.extent75220 bytes-
dc.format.extent120453 bytes-
dc.format.extent84450 bytes-
dc.format.extent105868 bytes-
dc.format.extent132592 bytes-
dc.format.extent336362 bytes-
dc.format.extent242799 bytes-
dc.format.extent308160 bytes-
dc.format.extent572889 bytes-
dc.format.extent126621 bytes-
dc.format.extent183824 bytes-
dc.format.extent188972 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095358005en_US
dc.subject產品責任保險zh_TW
dc.subject投保動機zh_TW
dc.subject產品安全風險管理zh_TW
dc.subject財務特性zh_TW
dc.subjectproduct liability insuranceen_US
dc.subjectmotivation of insurance demanden_US
dc.subjectproduct safety managementen_US
dc.subjectfinancial characteristicen_US
dc.title企業對產品責任保險需求因素之分析-以我國上市公司為例zh_TW
dc.titleOn the Corporate Demand for Product Liability Insurance: Evidence from Listed Compaines in Taiwanen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference中文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1.王濟川、郭志剛,2005,「Logistic回歸模型-方法及應用」,五南圖書出版股有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2.李欽賢、劉春堂,1998,「產品責任險與消費者保護法配合之研究」,財團法人保險事業發展中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3.李芷晴,2003年10月,「果凍噎死人,產品責任險保不保?」,現代保險第178期,pp.86- P.87。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4.李英正,2004,「論消保法上商品責任之危險議題」,消費者保護研究第十輯,行政院消費者保護委員會,pp.203-225。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5.李淑慧,2006年6月2日,「產品責任險不等於品質保證」,經濟日報。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6.林正明,1995,「產品責任(PL)對策」,超越企管顧問股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7.林益山,1994,「消費者保護法」,五南圖書出版公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8.林裕祖,1991,「因應製造人責任的產品責任風險控制計畫」,現代保險第27期,pp.82-85。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9.林世芬,1996,「論消費者保護法上服務提供人之規則型態兼評消費者保護法第七條、第五十一條」,中興大學法學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10.邱聰智,1996,「消費者保護法上商品責任之探討」,消費者保護研究第三輯,行政院消費者保護委員會,pp.61-86。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11.姚玉麟,1998,「產品責任保險」,保險實務,胡宜仁主編,三民書局印行。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12.孫芳文,1990,「產品責任保險相關法律問題之研究」,國立政治大學保險研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference13.郭麗珍,1996,「論產品責任中之產品安全(下)—民法債編通則修正草案第一九一條之一及消費者保護法暨施行細則相關規定之研究」,中興法學第40 期,pp.341-374。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14.陳順宇,2004,「多變量分析」,華泰書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference15.陳順宇,2000,「迴歸分析」,華泰書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference16.陳彩稚,1996,「保險學」,三民書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference17.陳淑惠,2004,「亡『犬』補牢話產品責任」,現代保險第185期,pp.79-82。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference18.陳雅萍,1999,「消費者保護法之商品責任與產品責任保險之研究」,國立政治大學風險管理與保險學系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference19.陳俊杰,2006,「我國消費者保護法懲罰性賠償金實務案例之研究」,國立中正大學法律學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20.陳瑞恒,1992,「產品責任險何時才能在我國普及?」,現代保險第40期,pp.74-77。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference21.彭紹英,2007,「SAS與統計分析」,儒林圖書有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference22.馮震宇,2003,「盛香珍案」引爆美國產品責任問題,貿易雜誌第127期,pp.30-35。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference23.黃宏全,2003,「美國法上之商品製造人責任」,消費者保護研究第八輯,行政院消費者保護委員會,pp.161-180。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference24.楊誠對,2005,「意外保險-理論與實務」,三民書局股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference25.曾郁仁、王儷玲和何素蘭,1999,「風險趨避程度增加對市場保險與自我保險的需求分析」,風險管理學報第一卷第二期, pp.53-P64。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference26.潘儀君,1997,「產品責任與產品責任保險以消費者保護法為中心探討二者互動之關係」,國立台灣大學法律學系研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference27.劉育誌,2007,「購買產品責任保險因素之實證研究-以財務面探討」,國立高雄第一科技大學風險管理與保險所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference28.蔡佩君,1998,「企業經營與產品責任保險」,月旦法學雜誌第37期,pp.102。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference29.蔡裕良,2007,「購買產品責任保險因素之實證研究-以製造商為例」,國立高雄第一科技大學風險管理與保險所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference30.蕭雅毓,2004,「論產品責任中產品瑕疵之判斷與舉證責任之分配―以民法第一百九十一條之一與消費者保護法為中心」,國立成功大學法律學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference31.羅子俞,2006,「產品責任保險之法律問題-以懲罰性賠償金為中心」,國立政治大學法律學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference32.1991年12月,「產品責任風險管理,現代的重頭戲」,現代保險第36期,pp.78-84。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference33.中華民國產物保險商業同業公會http://www.nlia.org.tw。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference英文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1.Beatty, A., A. Gron, and B. Jorgensen, 2004, “Corporate Risk management: Evidence from Product Liability”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 14:152-178.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2.Bernabei III, E. J., 2001, “Product liability claims”, Risk Management 48:52-59.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3.Marshall V., 2004, “Current Award Trends in Personal Injury”, Jury Verdicts Research 44th ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4.Courbage, C., 2001, “Self-Insurance, Self-Protection and Market Insurance within the Dual Theory of Choice”, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 26:43-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5.Dionne, G., and L. Eecckhoudt, 1985, “Self-Insurance, Self-Protection and Increased Risk Aversion”, Economics Letters 17:39-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6.Ehrlich, I., and G. S. Becker, 1972, “ Market insurance, self-insurance, and self- protection”, Journal of Political Economy 80: 623-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7.Fatemi, A., and C. Luft., 2002, “Corporate Risk Management Costs and Benefits”, Global Finance Journal 13:29-38.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8.Garven, J. R., and R. D. MacMinn, 1993, “The Underinvestment Problem, Bond Covenants, and Insurance”, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 60: 635-646.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9.Goodden, R., 2005, “Understanding the Focus of Product Liability Prevention”, The CEO Refersher, http://www.refresher.com/!liablity.html.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10.Hammer, W., 1993, “Product safty Management and engineering”, 2nd ed. Des Plaines, IL:ASSE.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11.Harrington, S. E., and G. R. Niehaus, 2003, “Risk and Management and Inssurance”, McGraw-Hill Inc, 2th ed, Ch9:162-178.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12.Hartwig, R. H., 2008, “Casualty Insurance Markets in Turbulent Times: Trends & Challenges”, Insurance Information Institute,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.iii.org/media/presentations/excesscasualty/.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference13.Hoyt, R.E., and H. Khang, 2000, “On the demand for corporate property insurance”, Journal of Risk and Insurance 67: 91-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14.Kaiser, H. F., 1970, A Second Generation little Jiffy, Psychometrika 35:401-415.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference15.Lawyers Weekly USA, January 2007, “Top Ten Jury Verdicts of 2006”, http://www.lawyersweeklyusa.com.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference16.Lawyers Weekly USA, February 2008, “Top Ten Jury Verdicts of 2007”, http://www.lawyersweeklyusa.com.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference17.MacMinn, R. D., 1987, “Insurance and Corporate Risk Management”, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 54:658-677.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference18.Maryers, S. C., 1977, “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing”, Journal of Financial Economics 5:147-175.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference19.Mayers, D., and C. W. Smith, 1982, “On the corporate demand for insurance”, The Journal of Business 55:281-296.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20.Mayers, D., and C. W. Smith, 1987, “Corporate insurance and the underinvestment problem”, Journal of Risk and Insurance 54:45-54.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference21.Modigliani, F. and M. H. Miller, 1958, “The cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment”, The American Economic Review, 48:261-297.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference22.Regan, L., and Y. Hur, 2007, “On the Corporate Demand for Insurance: The Case of Korean Nonfinancial Firms”, Journal of Risk and Insurance 74:829-850.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference23.Ryan, K. E., 2003, “Product Liability risk control”, Professional Safty 48:20-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference24.Saunders, A., E. Strock, and N. G. Travlos, 1990, “Ownership Structure, Deregulation, and Bank Risk Taking”, Journal of Finance 45:648-654.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference25.Seiger, M. B., and M. T. Griffin, 2002, “Product liability: Minimizing manufacturers` exposure to corporate criminal Liability”, Risk Management 49:30-33.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference26.Smith, C.W., and R. M. Stulz, 1985, “The determinants of firms’hedging policies”, Journal of Financial Quantitative Analysis 20:391-404.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference27.Smith, C.W., 1986, “On the convergence of insurance and finance research”, Journal of Risk and Insurance 53:693-717.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference28.Tillinghast-Towers Perrin, 2003, “U.S. Tort Costs;2003 Update, Trends and Findings on the Costs of the U.S. Tort Systems” , http://www.towersperrin.com.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference29.Tillinghast-Towers Perrin, 2005, “U.S. Tort Costs and Cross-Border Perspectives: 2005 Update”, http://www.towersperrin.com.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference30.Tillinghast-Towers Perrin, 2007, “2007 Update on U.S. Tort Cost Trends”, http://www.towersperrin.com.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference31.Tufano, P., 1996, “Who Manages Risk? An Empirical Examination of Risk Management Practices in the Gold Mining Industry”, The Journal of Finance 51:1097-1137.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference32.Viscusi, W. K., and M. J. Moore, 1993, “Product Liability, Research and Development , and Innovation”, Journal of Political Economy 101:161-184.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference33.Warner, J. B., 1977, “Bankruptcy Costs: Some Evidence”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 32:337-348.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference34.Williams, A., M. Smith, and P. Young, “Risk Management and Insurance”, McGraw-Hill Inc, 8th ed., 1998, Ch3, p.34-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference35.Zou, H., and M. B. Adams, 2006, “The corporate purchase of property insurance: Chinese evidence” ,Journal of Financial Intermediation 15:165-196.zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
800501.pdf73.46 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
800502.pdf117.63 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
800503.pdf82.47 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
800504.pdf103.39 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
800505.pdf129.48 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
800506.pdf328.48 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
800507.pdf237.11 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
800508.pdf300.94 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
800509.pdf559.46 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
800510.pdf123.65 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
800511.pdf179.52 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
800512.pdf184.54 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.