Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34288
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor李仁芳zh_TW
dc.contributor.author楊芝霞zh_TW
dc.creator楊芝霞zh_TW
dc.date2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-18T01:16:16Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-18T01:16:16Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-18T01:16:16Z-
dc.identifierG0089359002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34288-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description科技管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description89359002zh_TW
dc.description92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract如何激發團隊創新的能力,是台灣目前的產業發展方向,而一直以來,許多的研究都認為團隊創意的產生過程是雜亂無章的,本研究試圖經由對於個案訪談與觀察,來了解並釐清團隊的創新與創造過程,並進一步研究分析,在組織與個人的層面上,有利於團隊創新的因素為何,以期對於未來的創新團隊有所貢獻。\n\n台灣目前的產業走向強調內容(Content)之重要性,在娛樂經濟大未來終究有提到,娛樂產業是未來唯一可以有高成長的產業,在台灣邁向已開發國家的階段時,對於內容產業的發展與重視也將不斷的升高,可望成為下一波的產業發展趨勢;因此,本研究以目前的台灣所提倡的文化創意產業為例,研究表演藝術產業的戲劇團體之創新與創意發展過程,以期瞭解在過程中組織、領導者與團隊成員所扮演的角色,進一步並研究如何管理與激發組織與創意,以有效的讓團隊成員貢獻期能力,以達到團隊創新的多元性與綜效。\n\n本研究主要以Leonard(1999)的創意過程理論以及Mintzberg(2000)的組織理論,來分析創新團隊的創造過程,以國內六個知名現代劇團為例,透過個案訪談的方式來深入分析團隊的創新過程。\n\n根據本研究的觀察與分析,發現團隊創新有以下的特質,在過程中,領導者與組織文化也會對於創新的方向造成影響。經過本研究的分析與觀察,來自於團隊創新過程與組織中的啟發如下:\n1.創新型組織的團隊中,較容易產生多元價值,有助於團隊的創新產生,且更容易在變動的環境下生存。\n2.厚基的領域知識是團隊創新的基礎。而團隊多元價值的發揮有賴於團隊中信任與熟悉度的建立。\n3.具有多種領域專長的A型領導人,有助於團隊創新的產生與溝通,較容易領導出結合兩種領域的開創性作品。\n4.創意產生過程中,知識權與決策權的結合有助於創意的產生。\n5.時間壓力不利於創新準備期,卻有利於創新的開展與整合階段。\n\n本研究是以一個團隊管理的角度來研究創意的產生,以管理的觀點來研究創意的產生,使管理學界對於創意的產生能有更多的認識,進而發展更有效的激發團隊創意的要素,以期對於目前的創新團隊能夠有所貢獻。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractGroup creativity and innovation are the great topic of management. How to manage the group and lead more ideas? It’s a challenge for manager. This study tries to figure out the process of innovation and creativity.\nBecause of the focus of content industry in Taiwan, this study picks six famous performance groups to do the research. Also want to figure out the process of innovation in the performance group and find the effect way to manage the group innovation.\nThis research is based on two major theories: the creativity process theory of Leonard(1999) and the organization theory of Mintzberg(2000). Based on these two theories and the case study, the conclusion comes out as following:\n1.Innovation organization will lead to variety value and ideas inside the group and make organization stand out during the keen competence environment.\n2.Strong field knowledge is the base of group innovation. Trust between the group members will create variety value and ideas within the organization.\n3.The group with variety skills leader makes revolution and innovation easier inside the organization.\n4.During the creativity process, combination of decision power and knowledge power makes group member contributing their knowledge to organization.\n5.Time pressure makes development and integration step of innovation more efficient, but hurt the creativity process during the idea prepared step.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論\n 第一節 研究動機\n 第二節 研究目的與研究問題\n 第二章 相關理論與文獻探討\n 第一節 創新與創意\n 第二節 創新組織理論\n 第三節 團隊創意與創意過程理論\n 第四節 組織價值觀與知識創造\n 第五節 劇團創意產生動機\n 第六節 表演藝術與創意產業\n\n第三章 研究方法\n 第一節 研究架構\n 第二節 研究變項之定義與衡量方法\n 第三節 研究設計與資料蒐集方式\n 第四節 研究限制\n\n第四章 個案描述\n 第一節 表演工作坊\n 第二節 相聲瓦舍\n 第三節 綠光劇團\n 第四節 果陀劇場\n 第五節 屏風表演班\n 第六節 當代傳奇劇場\n\n第五章 研究發現\n 第一節 組織結構對於創意產生的影響\n 第二節 創意團隊形成與溝通\n 第三節 領導風格與組織價值觀對於創意產生的影響\n 第四節 影響創意產生的動機\n 第五節 創新核心能力之分析\n\n第六章 結論與建議\n 第一節 研究結論\n 第二節 後續研究建議\n\n參考文獻zh_TW
dc.format.extent51878 bytes-
dc.format.extent85413 bytes-
dc.format.extent300181 bytes-
dc.format.extent183027 bytes-
dc.format.extent502374 bytes-
dc.format.extent208129 bytes-
dc.format.extent711366 bytes-
dc.format.extent494476 bytes-
dc.format.extent167681 bytes-
dc.format.extent114987 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089359002en_US
dc.subject創新zh_TW
dc.subject團隊zh_TW
dc.subject劇團zh_TW
dc.subject創意zh_TW
dc.title創新團隊創造過程研究─以表演藝術劇團為例zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、中文期刊與論文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1.白泰澤,「由《千禧年,我們說相聲》看賴聲川所領導的集體即興創作」,國立台灣大學戲劇研究所碩士論文,2001。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2.吳育珊,「屏風表演班之研究:1986至1996」,國立成功大學藝術研究所碩士論文,1995。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3.李仁芳,「成功企業的失敗觀」,數位時代雜誌,巨思文化,2000年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4.李仁芳,「首相有兩種」,數位時代2001年7月號,巨思文化,2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5.李仁芳,「從阿里山神木到挪威森林」,數位時代雜誌,巨思文化,2002年8月份。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6.李仁芳,「軟體就像性:免費的比較好?」,數位時代雜誌,巨思文化,2001年6月份。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7.李仁芳,「創新CEO—聽聞內心鼓聲前進的人」,白金世紀雜誌知識管理專欄,2001年夏季號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8.李仁芳,「歡愉的智慧」,EMBA世界經理文摘,2000年元月號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9.郭珮霖,「作為劇場語言的即興創作—賴聲川的戲劇創作與台灣劇場的發展經驗」,國立藝術學院戲劇研究所碩士論文,1997。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10.陳珮真,「臺灣渥克劇團1992-1995:臺灣九0年代前衛劇場活動初探」,國立藝術學院戲劇研究所碩士論文,1997。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11.華慧瑩,「果陀劇場演出及《淡水小鎮》之研究」,中國文化大學藝術研究所碩士論文,1997。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12.蔡宜真,「賴聲川劇場集體即興創作的來源與實踐」,國立成功大學中文研究所碩士論文,2000。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、中文書籍部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1.「人間條件2003年版」節目單,綠光劇團,2003。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2.「在那遙遠的星球,一粒沙」節目單,表演工作坊,2003。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3.Allan Afuah著,徐作聖、邱奕嘉譯,「創新管理」,華泰出版公司,2000。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4.Dorothy Leonard & Walter Swap著,「激發團隊創意」(When Sparks Fly), 施貞夙 譯,中國生產力中心,1999。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5.Dorothy Leonard-Barton 著,王美音 譯,「知識創新之泉—智價企業的經營」,台北市,遠流出版社,1998。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6.Henry Mintzberg著,「閩茲柏格談管理」,中天出版社,2000年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7.Howard Garden著,林佩芝 譯,「創造心靈:七位大師創造力剖析」,牛頓出版社,1997。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8.Ikujiro Nonaka & Hirotaka Takeuchi 著,楊子江、王美音 譯,「創新求勝—智價企業論」,遠流出版社,1997。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9.Linus Torvalds,David Diamond著,梁曉鶯譯,「Just for Fun : Linux創始人托瓦茲自傳」,經典傳訊,2001。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10.Mark Pesce 著,「遊習世紀」(The playful world: how the technology is transforming our imagination),大塊文化,2001。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11.Michael J. Wolf著,「無所不在-娛樂經濟大未來」(The Entertainment Economy),中國生產力中心, 2000。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12.Mihaly Csiksentimihalyi著,杜明城譯,「創造力」,時報文化出版企業股份有限公司,1998。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference13.Robert Sternberg著,洪蘭 譯,「不同凡想—在一窩峰文化中開拓創造力」,遠流出版社,1999。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14.Thomas A. Stewart著,「智慧資本-資訊時代的企業利基」(Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations),智庫, 1999。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference15.王秉鈞,「個案研究法在企業管理上之應用與評議」,第一屆管理學術定性研究法研討會,頁176-189,1995。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference16.李仁芳,「管理心靈」,輔仁大學管理學研究所,1990zh_TW
dc.relation.reference17.李立亨,「OH!李國修」,時報文化出版,1998。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference18.李立亨,「我的看戲隨身書」,天下文化,2000。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference19.谷口正和,「認真未必是對的」,財經傳訊,2000。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20.鍾明德,「在後現代主義的雜音中」,書林出版有限公司,1994。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference三、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1.Amabile, T. M., “The social psychology of creativity”, New York:Springer-Verlag, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2.Amabile, T. M., et al., “Assessing the work environment for creativity”, Academy of Management Journal Vol.39, No. 5, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3.Benbasat, I. and others, \"The Case Study Research Strategy in Studies on Information Systems\", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 3, Sep, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4.Berelson G.M. & Steiner G.A.,”Human Behavior”, New York, Harcourt, Brace & World,1964.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5.Dorothy Leonard, Sylvia Sensiper, “The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation”, California Management Review vol 40, No.3, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6.Friedrich Hayek, “The Use of Knowledge in Society.”, The American Economic Review, 35, 1945.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7.Grant, Robert M , Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm; Strategic Management Journal, Chichester; Winter 1996; Vol. 17.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8.Harold J. Leavitt & Jean Lipman-Blumen, “Hot Groups: Their Seeding, Feeding, Weeding and Harvesting”, Harvard Business Review, July/Aug., 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9.Harold J. Leavitt & Jean Lipman-Blumen, “Hot Groups: Their Seeding, Feeding, Weeding and Harvesting”, Harvard Business Review, July/Aug, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10.Hayes, J. R., “Cognitive processes in creativity.” In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds, Handbook of Creativity, New York:Plenum Press, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11.Hill, K. G.,& Amabile, T. M., “A social psychological perspective on creativity: Intrinsic Motivation and Creativity in the Classroom and Workplace.”, The Emergence of a discipline, edited by Scott G. Isaksen [et al.]. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub.Corp, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12.Jeffery A. Govendo ,”Group creativity”, Executive excellence, Sep 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference13.Michelle Gillan Fisher, ”The mothers (and fathers) of invention”, Successful Meetings,New York, Aug, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14.Mintzberg, Henry, \"Covert Leadership: Notes on Managing Professionals\" Harvard Business Review, November-December, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference15.Ochse, R., “Before the gates of excellence: The determinates of creative genius.”, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference16.Ogden,DunberH., “Performance Dynamics and the Amsterdam Werkteater“, California: University of California Press, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference17.Ralph Katz, “Managing Professional Careers:The Influence of job Longevity and group Age.”, The Strategic Management of Technology, Oxford University Press, 1996zh_TW
dc.relation.reference18.Richard Caves, “Creative Industry”, Harvard Business School Press, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference19.Robert I. Sutton, “The weird rules of Creativity”, Harvard Business Review Sep 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20.Sharon Arad, Mary Ann Hanson, & Robert J. Schneider, “Organizational Context”, An Occupational Information System for the 21st Century, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference21.Spolin,Viola, “Improvisatio for the Theate“, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference22.Teresa Amabile, Constance N. Hadley, Steven J. Kramer, ”Creativity under the Gun”, Harvard Business Review, Aug, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference23.Teresa M. Amabile, “Motivating Creativity in Organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do”, California Management Review vol 40, No.1., 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference24.Woodman, Richard W, Sawyer, John E, Griffin, & Ricky W, “Toward a theory of organizational creativity“, Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review; Mississippi State, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference四、網站部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1.文建會網路劇院 http://www.cyberstage.com.tw/default.aspzh_TW
dc.relation.reference2.國家文化藝術基金會網 http://www.ncaf.org.tw/map/map3.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference3.表演工作坊網站 http://www.pwshop.com/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4.相聲瓦舍網站 http://www.ngng.com.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5.綠光劇團網站 http://www.greenray.com.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6.果陀劇場網站 http://www.godot.org.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7.屏風表演班網站 http://www.pingfong.com.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8.當代傳奇劇場網站 http://clt.rollcoco.com/zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
35900201.pdf50.66 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35900202.pdf83.41 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35900203.pdf293.15 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35900204.pdf178.74 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35900205.pdf490.6 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35900206.pdf203.25 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35900207.pdf694.69 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35900208.pdf482.89 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35900209.pdf163.75 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35900210.pdf112.29 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.