1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 社會科學學院
  3. 國家發展研究所
  4. 學位論文
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34387
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor黃智聰zh_TW
dc.contributor.author林昇誼zh_TW
dc.creator林昇誼zh_TW
dc.date2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-18T02:07:51Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-18T02:07:51Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-18T02:07:51Z-
dc.identifierG0090261007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34387-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description中山人文社會科學研究所zh_TW
dc.description90261007zh_TW
dc.description91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract關 鍵 詞：中國、外資企業、技術效率、製造業\n本文研究的目的，主要再一次確認台港澳企業與其他外資企業，在中國製造業的生產績效的差異。陳永生（2001）以文化的角度切入，指出華裔企業在1997年的投資績效要優於非華裔企業。該文更進一步指出，因華裔企業與中國的文化相近，致使其投資績效是進步的，而非華裔企業是退步的。但高長（1996）卻發現，美商、日商等其他外資企業的獲利性比港澳企業高，而台資企業的獲利性則較港澳資企業差，經營績效表現之有所差異，文化並不是影響華裔企業與非華裔企業經營績效的最主要因素。由於兩種立論各有其依據。因此，本文使用Battese and Coelli（1995）所提出的實証模型，以及利用1993、1994與1997年《中國統計年鑑》、《中國工業經濟統計年鑑》所提供的中國各地區的官方統計資料，估計隨機邊界生產函數（stochastic frontier production function）。\n本文主要的研究發現為，在控制了其它因素之後，台港澳企業與其他外資企業的生產績效在1993與1997兩年並無顯著的差異。但是，在1994年台港澳企業的生產績效卻較其他外資企業要來的低落。這隱含文化因素並沒有使台港澳資企業的生產技術效率，明顯地高於其它外資企業。\n台港澳企業與其他外資企業的經營績效的確有差異，但是造成外資企業生產效率差異的影響因素，主要是是企業的規模、資本密集度、以及是否為沿海地區。外資企業的生產規模越大，生產績效越高。中國的外商企業，似乎有過度使用資本的情況，致使其生產效率隨著資本密集度的增加而下降。另外，沿海外資企業生產效率較內地者為佳。但是，台港澳企業與其它外資企業，因歷史、文化及語言差異而造成在生產效率上的差異並不顯著。也就是說，歷史、文化及語言上的差異，並不是造成台港澳企業生產績效較好的原因。而這一個研究發現，並無法支持陳永生（2001）認為，歷史、文化及語言上的差異，是造成台港澳企業生產績效較好的原因的結論。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractTitle：A Comparison of Technical Efficiency of Production among\n Different Sources of Foreign-Funded Enterprises—A Case of China’s Manufacturing Sector\nSchool：Sun Yat-Sen Graduate Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities, National Chengchi University）\nAdvisor：Jr-Tsung Huang\nAuthor：Sheng-Yi Lin\nKeywords：China, foreign-funded enterprises, manufacturing sector, technical efficiency\n\nThis study aims to investigate the difference between the technical efficiency of Taiwan, Hong-Kong and Macao enterprises （THM, hereafter） and that of foreign enterprises from other countries （FOR, hereafter） in China’s manufacturing sector. This study utilizes the empirical methodology model proposed by Battese and Coelli （1995） and the industrial-based panel data from 1993~1994 and from 1997 provided by various years of China Statistical Year Book and China Industrial Economy Statistical Year Book to estimate the stochastic frontier production function. The primary finding of this study is that, after controlling other explanatory variables, there is no difference in technical efficiency between THM and FOR in 1993 and 1997.\nHowever, the technical efficiency of FOR was better than that of THM in 1994. This result also implies that the cultural factor didn’t help the technical efficiency of THM to be better than that of FOR. This result is quite different with the conclusion of Cheng （2001）.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章、緒論\n第一節、研究動機與目的…………………………………………6\n第二節、研究架構與章節安排……………………………………11\n第二章、文獻回顧\n第一節、對外直接投資理論…………………………………....13\n第二節、台港澳企業與其他外資企業差異……………… …...19\n第三章、外資企業在中國投資概況\n第一節、中國對外商投資開放政策………………………… …26\n第二節、外資企業在中國投資的狀況分析………………………33\n第三節、台港澳企業與其他外資企業經營分析比較……………43\n第四章、研究方法與變數資料\n第一節、實證模型………………………………………………..49\n第二節、相關變數定義與資料來源……………………………..54\n第五章、實證結果\n第一節、台港澳企業與其他外資企業技術效率差異…………..58\n第二節、台港澳企業與其他外資企業技術效率差異原因……..62\n\n第六章、結論與政策意涵\n第一節、主要結論……………………………………………… .63\n第二節、政策意涵……………………………………………… .67\n參考文獻zh_TW
dc.format.extent13372 bytes-
dc.format.extent12268 bytes-
dc.format.extent15553 bytes-
dc.format.extent18766 bytes-
dc.format.extent14338 bytes-
dc.format.extent13037 bytes-
dc.format.extent16615 bytes-
dc.format.extent26805 bytes-
dc.format.extent42057 bytes-
dc.format.extent91094 bytes-
dc.format.extent48245 bytes-
dc.format.extent43688 bytes-
dc.format.extent20912 bytes-
dc.format.extent27608 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090261007en_US
dc.subject中國zh_TW
dc.subject外資企業zh_TW
dc.subject技術效率zh_TW
dc.subject製造業zh_TW
dc.title不同來源外資企業在中國生產效率之比較－以工業部門為例zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、英文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAigner, D. J. Lovell, C.A.K. and Schmidt, P. (1977), “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models,” Journal of Economics, 6 , pp.21-37.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAigner, D.J. and Chu, S.F. (1968), “On Estimating the Industry Production Function,” American Economic Review, 58, pp. 568-598.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmbler, Steve. and Paquet, Alain. (1994), “Stochastic Depreciation and theBusiness Cycle, ” International Economic Review, 35(1), pp.101-116.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBattese, G. E. and Coelli, T. J. (1995), “A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data,” Empirical Economics, 20(2), pp. 325-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlomstrom, M. and Wolff, E. (1989), “Multinational Corporations and Productivity Convergency in Mexico,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper# 3141, MA :Cambridge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlomstrom, M. and Persson, H. (1983), “Foreign Investment and Spillover Efficiency in an Underdeveloped Economy：Evidence from the Mexican Manufacturing Industry,” World Development, 11(6), pp. 493-501.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCaves, R. E.(1974), “Multinational Firms, Competition, and Productivity in Host-Country Markets,” Economica, 41, pp. 176-193.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChung, C. (1994), “Taiwan`s FDI in Mainland China： Impact on the Domestic and Host Economies,” in Lyons, T. P. and V. Nee (eds.), The Economic Transformation of South China：Reform and Development in the Post-Mao Era. Cornell East Asia Series, Ithaca：Cornell University, East Asia Program, pp. 215-242.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCooper, W. and Tone, K. (1997), “Measures of Inefficiency in Date Envelopment analysis and Stochastic Frontier Estimation,” European Journal of Operational Research, 98, pp. 72-88.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDees, S. (1998), “Foreign Direct Investment in China： Determinants and Effects,” Economics of Planning, 31(2-3), pp. 175-194.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDoowon, Lee and Youngrok, Cheong. (1999), “Comparison of FDI Into CHINA Between Korean Firms and Ethnic Chinese Firms,” Global Economic Review, 28(1), pp. 28-53.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDunningn, John. H. (1993), “Multional Enterprises and the Global Economy,” England Working-ham Addison Wesley Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFarell, M.J. (1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series, Part 3,A, pp. 253-290.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGloberman, S. (1979), “Foreign Investment and ‘Spillover Efficiency Benefits in Canadian Manufacturing Industries,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 12, pp. 42-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGreene, W.H. (1980), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Econometric Frontier Functions,” Journal of Econometrics, 13, pp. 27-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGunnar, Myrdal (1956), “Development and unDevelopment：A Note on the Mechanism of National and International Inequality,” Cario：National Bank of Egypt, pp. 9-10.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHaddad, M. and Harrison, A. (1993), “Are Three Positive Spillovers from Direct Foreign Investment：Evidence from Panel Data for Morocco,” Journal of Development Economics, 42, pp. 51-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuang, Jr, Tsung. (2003), “Spillover from Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macau Investment and from Other Foreign Investment in Chinese Industries.” Contemporary Economic Policy, forthcoming.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJefferson, G. H. (2000), “Ownership, Productivity Change, and Financial Performance in Chinese Industry,” Journal of Comparative Economics, 28(4), pp. 786-813.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKokko, A. (1994), “Technology, Market Characteristic, and Spillover,” Journal of Development Economics, 43, pp. 279-293.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKokko, A, Tansini, R. and Zejan, M.C. (1996), “Local Technological Capability and Productivity Spillovers from FDI in the Uruguayan Manufacturing Secto,” Journal of Development Studies, 32(4), pp. 602-611.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMckinnon, R. (1964), “Foreign Exchange Constraints in Economics Development and Efficient Aid Allocation,” Economics Journal, 74, pp. 25-31..zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeeusen, Wim and van. Den. Broeck, J (1977), \"Technical Efficiency andDimension of the Firm: Some Results on the Use of Frontier ProductionFunctions,\" Empirical Economics, 2(2), pp109-122.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOtsuka, K., Liu, D. and Murakami, N. (1998), Industrial Reform in China Past Performance and Future Prospect, Oxford：Clarendon Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReifschneider, D. and Stevenson, R. (1991), “Systematic Departures from the Frontier：Framework for the Analysis of Firm Inefficiency,” International Economic Review; 32(3), pp. 715-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRosentein, D. and Rodan, N. (1961), “International Aid for Underdevelop Countries,” Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 43-45..zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStevenson, R.E. (1980), “Likelihood Functions for Generalised Stochastic Frontier Eastimation,” Journal of Economics, 13, pp. 57-66.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSun, H, Hone, P. and Doucouliagos, H (1999), “Economic Openness and Technical Efficiency：A Case Study of Chinese Manufacturing Industries,” Economics of Transition, 7, pp.615-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTyler, W. (1979), “Technical Efficiency in Production in a Developing Country,” Oxford Economic Papers, 31(3), pp. 477-95.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVernon,R. (1966), “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,” Quartely Journal of Economics, 80, pp. 190-207.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWu, Yanrui. (2000), “Measuring the Performance of Foreign Direct Investment： A Case Study of China,” Economics Letters, 66(2), pp.143-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZhang, W. and Taylor, R. (2001), “EU Technology Transfer to China： The Automotive Industry as a Case Study;” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 6(2), pp. 261-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZhang, X. G. and Zhang, S. (2001), “Technical Efficiency in China`s Iron and Steel Industry： Evidence from the New Census Data,” International Review of Applied Economics, 15(2), pp.199-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、中文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference《中國工業經濟統計年鑑》，（1994、1995、1998），北京：中國統計出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference《中國統計年鑑》，（1994-2001），北京：中國統計出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中國對外經貿研究編輯部（1996），〈歐美、華人、日商對中國投資比較〉，《中國對外經貿研究》，第470期，頁2-10。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王泰銓、林宏儒（2001），〈台灣投資企業與外商投資企業在中國投資地位之比較分析（下）〉，《法令月刊》，第50卷第1期，頁11-19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference宋泓、柴瑜（1998），〈三資企業對我國工業結構效益影響的實證研究〉，《經濟研究》（北京），第1期，頁30-36。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference姚洋（1998），〈非國有經濟成分對我國工業企業技術效率的影響〉，《經濟研究》（北京），第12期，頁29-35。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡名雯、薛琦（1997），〈中小企業生產特性與效率之研究：台灣製造業之分析〉，《經濟論文叢刊》，國立台灣大學經濟系，頁1-26。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference夏京文（2001），〈我國利用外資的結構分析〉，《現代情報》，第6期，頁68-70。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高長（1996），〈外商企業在中國投資獲利性的決定因素〉，《台灣經濟學會年會論文集》，頁67-94。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高長（1997），〈中國吸引外商投資政策與總體經濟環境評析〉，《共黨問題研究》，第23卷第5期 ， 頁49-59。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高長（2001），〈製造業赴中國投資經營當地化及其對台灣經濟之影響〉，《經濟情勢暨評論》，第7卷第1期 ，頁138-173。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高長、吳世英、季聲國（1995），〈台商與外資在中國投資經驗之調查研究-以製造業為例〉，台北；中華經濟研究院。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莊奕琦、許碧峰（2001），〈國際貿易、外人直接投資與產業生產力：，中國中國實證研究〉，《經濟論文》，29：2，頁221-249。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳永生（2001），〈台港澳與其他外資企業中國投資績效之比較研究〉，《中國研究》，第44卷第8期 ，頁23-42。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃智聰、潘俊男（2002），〈1993年以來中國的地區製造業產業結構的決定因素〉，《中國研究》，第45卷第2期，頁97-123。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡宏明（1994），〈中日對中國投資之比較研究〉，《問題與研究》，第33卷第1期，76-87頁。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭玉歆、張曉、張思奇（1996），〈技術效率、技術進步及其對生產率的貢 獻—沿海工業企業調查的初步分析〉，《數量經濟技術經濟研究》（北京），第12期，頁20-27。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference漢查利（1984），〈外援和經濟發展〉，《現代國外經濟學論文選》，台北，第8期，頁102。zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
26100701.pdf13.06 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26100702.pdf11.98 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26100703.pdf15.19 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26100704.pdf18.33 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26100705.pdf14 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26100706.pdf12.73 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26100707.pdf16.23 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26100708.pdf26.18 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26100709.pdf41.07 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26100710.pdf88.96 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26100711.pdf47.11 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26100712.pdf42.66 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26100713.pdf20.42 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26100714.pdf26.96 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.