Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35775
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor莊委桐zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorJuang, Wei Torngen_US
dc.contributor.author高涵彥zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorKao, Han Yenen_US
dc.creator高涵彥zh_TW
dc.creatorKao, Han Yenen_US
dc.date2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-18T07:59:25Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-18T07:59:25Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-18T07:59:25Z-
dc.identifierG0094258020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35775-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description經濟研究所zh_TW
dc.description94258020zh_TW
dc.description95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract近年來,媒體偏頗(media bias)的現象愈來愈引起經濟學家的注意。本文指出,即便媒體本身的意識型態中立,他們仍然有誘因為了迎合閱聽眾的口味而帶著立場扭曲他們的報導。比較有趣的是,在這篇文章中,即使沒有在文獻中提到的價格競爭或是媒體考量本身聲譽的效果,在一些普遍的情況下,新聞媒體的意識型態仍會傾向兩極化。另外,我們也指出,這樣的兩極化現象,會透過媒體與閱聽眾之間的交互影響輕易地深化。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractMedia bias has been attracting more and more attention of economists in recent years. This essay shows that, even the media firms are ideologically neutral, they still have\nincentives to slant their news to cater to the audience or readers. An interesting feature of this paper is that, even though without reputation and price competition effects proposed in the literature, the ideology of news reported is apt to be polarized under some situations which are very common in reality. We also show that polarization could be easily deepened through some interaction between media firms and news consumers.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2\n2.0 MODEL DESCRIPTION AND DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7\n2.1 Basic Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7\n2.2 Examples and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8\n3.0 EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13\n3.1 Model Deriving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13\n3.2 Maximum Tolerated Difference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18\n4.0 BELIEF UPDATING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21\n4.1 Change of Ideology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21\n4.2 Dynamic Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24\n5.0 CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31\nBIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34zh_TW
dc.format.extent12503 bytes-
dc.format.extent117245 bytes-
dc.format.extent12596 bytes-
dc.format.extent74415 bytes-
dc.format.extent26590 bytes-
dc.format.extent38523 bytes-
dc.format.extent71950 bytes-
dc.format.extent81470 bytes-
dc.format.extent93242 bytes-
dc.format.extent27019 bytes-
dc.format.extent35024 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094258020en_US
dc.subject媒體偏頗zh_TW
dc.subject極化zh_TW
dc.subjectmedia biasen_US
dc.subjectpolarizationen_US
dc.title媒體偏頗與意識型態的兩極化分析zh_TW
dc.titleMedia Bias and Ideological Polarizationen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference[1] Baron, D. (2006). Persistent Media Bias. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[2] Bernhardt, D., Krasa, S. and Polborn, M. (2006). Political Polarization and the Electoral Effects of Media Bias. CESifo working paper #1798.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[3] Chomsky, N. (2002). Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda. New York: Seven Stories Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[4] Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[5] Ellison, G. and Fudenberg, D. (1993). Rules of Thumb for Social Learning. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 612-643.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[6] Gentzkow, M. and J. Shapiro (2006). Media Bias and Reputation. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 280-316.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[7] Gerber, A., Karlan, D. and Bergan, D. (2006). Does the Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effect of Newspapers on Voting Behavior and Political Opinions. Yale working paper on economic applications and policy #12.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[8] Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability In Competition. Economic Journal, 39, 41-57.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[9] Lee, M. and Solomon, N. (1990). Unreliable Sources: A Guide to Detecting Bias in News Media. New York: Carol Publishing Group.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[10] Mullainathan, S. and Shleifer, A. (2005). The Market for News. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1031-1053.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[11] Zingrone, F. (2001). The Media Symplex: At the Edge of Meaning in the Age of Chaos. Toronto: Stoddart Publishing Company.zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
802001.pdf12.21 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
802002.pdf114.5 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
802003.pdf12.3 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
802004.pdf72.67 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
802005.pdf25.97 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
802006.pdf37.62 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
802007.pdf70.26 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
802008.pdf79.56 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
802009.pdf91.06 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
802010.pdf26.39 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
802011.pdf34.2 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.