Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37431
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor王智賢zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWang, Jue-Shyanen_US
dc.contributor.author劉郁潔zh_TW
dc.creator劉郁潔zh_TW
dc.date2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-19T05:47:45Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-19T05:47:45Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-19T05:47:45Z-
dc.identifierG0096255028en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37431-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description財政研究所zh_TW
dc.description96255028zh_TW
dc.description97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract政府在制定政策的過程中,往往會受到利益團體影響。我們藉由 Grossman and Helpman (1994) 所發展的政治獻金模型為架構,討論在國內生產具有負面外部性的情況下,政府決定是否開放具有生產優勢的外國廠商進入本國生產的決策。我們發現開放外人直接投資與否,受到政府對社會福利重視的程度所影響。在政府極端不重視社會福利且生產完全無生產技術外溢時,政府將不會選擇開放國外廠商進入本國投資,而一般情況下,當市場規模夠大且政府重視社會福利有一定程度時,生產時所造成的負面外部性愈大,本國政府將傾向不開放外國廠商進入本國直接生產。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractSince the domestic government can makes its choice between alternative policy instruments to maximize its’ welfare, this paper analyzes how a domestic government makes the policy about foreign direct investment by Grossman and Helpman (1994) political contribution model. It shows that opening FDI or not is affected by the weight that the domestic government puts on the social welfare. We found that domestic government tends not to open FDI when it puts little weight on the social welfare. In this case that the weight and market are large enough, the domestic government tends to open FDI as the pollution externality increases.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents壹、前言…………………………………………………………………3\n貳、 模型設定…………………………………………………………7\n一、 兩國廠商的生產決策…………………………………………………8\n二、 本國政府訂定關稅的決策……………………………………………9\n参、 本國政府考慮外國廠商投資模型………………………………14\n一、 兩國廠商的生產決策………………………………………………15\n二、 本國政府決定開放與否的政策……………………………………16\n肆、 本國政府選擇進口遊說競爭或開放直接投資的決策………17\n一、 政府極端不重視社會福利且完全無生產技術外溢下……………17\n二、政府僅重視社會福利且生產具有完全技術外溢下…………………19\n三、 比較靜態分析 ……………………………………………………20\n伍、結論 ……………………………………………………………25\n附錄 1:………………………………………………………………26\n附錄 2:………………………………………………………………27\n附錄 3: ………………………………………………………………27\n參考文獻………………………………………………………………29zh_TW
dc.format.extent127028 bytes-
dc.format.extent148116 bytes-
dc.format.extent151313 bytes-
dc.format.extent90322 bytes-
dc.format.extent113805 bytes-
dc.format.extent296223 bytes-
dc.format.extent300374 bytes-
dc.format.extent216069 bytes-
dc.format.extent281918 bytes-
dc.format.extent166099 bytes-
dc.format.extent215114 bytes-
dc.format.extent140937 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096255028en_US
dc.subject外人直接投資zh_TW
dc.subject政治獻金zh_TW
dc.subject技術外溢效果zh_TW
dc.subject污染外部性zh_TW
dc.title外人直接投資或關稅遊說-污染外部性模型zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference1. 王智賢、蔡坤良 (2005),「政治獻金限額與關稅遊說」,《經濟研究》,41(2):207-247。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2. 王智賢、翁永和 (2006),「最適自製率與政治獻金」,《人文及社會科學集刊》,18(2):269-291。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3. 王智賢、林惠敏 (2007) 「污染管制與政治獻金」,《經社法制論叢》,40, 123-149。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4. 王智賢、楊敦雅 (2007) 「仿冒查緝與政治獻金」,《經濟研究》,44, 107-138。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5. 林奇蓉 (2004),「政治遊說與策略性貿易政策」,《經濟論文叢刊》,22, 203-228。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6. 邱俊榮、蔡宜臻 (2006),「對外直接投資與研究發展」,《經濟論文》,35:1, 53-82。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7. 賴育邦 (2005a),「利益團體、工資談判與環境政策」。《農業與經濟》,35, 87-118。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8. 賴育邦 (2005b),「全球經濟整合對地方環境政策之衝擊-一個「共同代理人」模型的應用」,《經社法制論叢》,35:259-284。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9. 賴育邦 (2006),「污染許可交易與利益團體」,《經濟論文叢刊》,34:3, 264-284。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10. Aidt, T. S. (1997) “ Political Internalization of Economic Externalities and Environmental Policy, ” Journal of Public Economics, 69, 1-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11. Aidt, T. S. (1998) “ Cooperative Lobbying and Endogenous Trade Policy, ” Public Choice, 93:3-4, 455-457.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12. Bernheim, B. D. and M. D. Whinston (1986), “Menu Auction, Resource Allocation,and Economic Influence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 1-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference13. Blomstrom, M. and H. Persson (1983), “ Foreign Investment and Spillover Efficiency in An Underdeveloped Economy: Evidence from the Mexico Manufacturing Industry, ” World Development, 11, 493-501zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14. Chuang, Y, C. and C. M. Lin (1999), “Foreign Direct Investment, R&D, and Spillover Efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan``s Manufacturing Firms, ” Journal of Development Studies, 35, 117-137.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference15. Fischer, R. and P. Serra (2000) “Standards and Protection,” Journal of International Economics, 52:3, 77-400.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference16. Gawande, K., P. Krishna and M. J. Robbins (2004), “ Foreign Lobbies and US Trade Policy,” NBER Working Paper No. 10205.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference17. Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1994), “Protection for Sale, ” American Economic Review, 84, 833-850.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference18. Helpman, E. , M. J. Melitz and S. R. Yeaple (2004), “Export versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms, ” American Economic Review, 94, 300-316.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference19. Konishi, H. , K. Saggi, and S. Weber (1999), “Endogenous Trade Policy under Foreign Direct Investment, ” Journal of International Economics, 49, 289-308.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20. Lai, Y.-B (2003) “Interest Group, Economic Competition and Endogenous Public Policy, ” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 159, 342-361.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference21. Lai, Y.-B (2006a) “Capital Tax Competition in the Presence of Rent-Shifting Incentives,? ” Taipei Economic Inquiry, 42, 1-24zh_TW
dc.relation.reference22. Lai, Y.-B (2006b) “Interest Group, Trade Liberlization, and Environmental Standards, ” Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 34, 269-390.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference23. Lai, Y.-B (2007) “The Optimal Distribution of Pollution Right in the Presence of Political Distortions, ” Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 36, 367-388.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference24. Mitra, D. (2002),“Endogenous Political Organization and the Value of Trade Agreements, ” Journal of International Economics, 57, 473-485.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference25. Magee, C. (2002), “Endogenous Trade Policy and Lobby Formation:An Application to the Free-Rider Problem, ” Journal of International Economics, 57, 449-471.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference26. Wang, J-Y. and M. Blomstrom (1992),“Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer:A Simple Model, ” European Economics Review, 36, 137-155.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference27. Wang, J. S., H. W. Koo, and T. J. Chen (2006), “Resource Rivalry and Endogenous Lobby, ” Japan and the World Economy, 18: 4, 488-511.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference28. Young, A. (1992), “A Tale of Two Cities:Factor Accumulation and Technical Change in Hong Kong and Singapore ,” in O. J. Blanchard and S. Fischer(eds), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1992, pp. 13-54, Cambridge MA:MIT Presszh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
502801.pdf124.05 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
502802.pdf144.64 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
502803.pdf147.77 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
502804.pdf88.21 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
502805.pdf111.14 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
502806.pdf289.28 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
502807.pdf293.33 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
502808.pdf211 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
502809.pdf275.31 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
502810.pdf162.21 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
502811.pdf210.07 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
502812.pdf137.63 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.