Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49935
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor湯京平zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorTang, Ching Pingen_US
dc.contributor.author李聯康zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLee, Lien Kangen_US
dc.creator李聯康zh_TW
dc.creatorLee, Lien Kangen_US
dc.date2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-09T06:05:08Z-
dc.date.available2010-12-09T06:05:08Z-
dc.date.issued2010-12-09T06:05:08Z-
dc.identifierG0095252010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49935-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description政治研究所zh_TW
dc.description95252010zh_TW
dc.description97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract「社基保育」(Community-Based Conservation)是強調「由下到上」(bottom-up)的自然資源管理模式。透過在地民眾的參與(participation),不僅減少政府在自然資源管理的支出,形成為社區居民認可的資源管理模式;更重要的,透過居民參與,社基保育連結地方自治(self-governance)與民主(democracy),實踐公共財合產(coproduction)與增效(synergy)的效果。因此社基保育不僅有生態保育的優勢,更有政治與經濟面的討論意義。\n以往對社基保育的研究,多以鄉村或原住民地區的資源管理為研究範例,這些地區藉由居民的共議或傳統文化,獲得居民認同,刺激居民主動參與。然而若將研究焦點轉向都市地區,社基保育能否發揮相同功效?透過本研究的兩個案例—台北市富陽自然生態公園與台南市巴克禮紀念公園,社基保育在都市社區中仍有實行的可能。但相較鄉村與原民社區,都市社基保育的參與者更多,彼此溝通協調需要更多成本,形成集體行動也更不容易。本研究兩個案例中的里長,皆發揮動員居民的功能,並代表居民和其他參與者如政府、非營利組織溝通,降低居民參與的成本,營造居民集體行動的雛形。而政府、非營利組織與居民在社基保育過程中的關係,將影響社基保育能否達成在地落實的目標。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractCommunity-Based Conservation is the model emphasizing “bottom-up” power of managing natural resources. It reduces the government’s cost of resource management, and becomes a widely accepted model by the locals through their participation. Furthermore, it combines Coproduction, Synergy, local Self-Governance, and Democracy Governance through the locals’ direct participation. Therefore, Community-Based Conservation not only has advantage in ecological conservation, but also shows importance in politics and economics.\n Previously, the researches on Community-Based Conservation often take resource management models in rural and indigenous areas as their cases. These models obtain the residents’ identity and stimulate their active participation by their discussion or the influence of traditional culture. But if we transfer the researches’ focus to urban areas, can Community-Based Conservation play the same role? Through the two cases in this thesis: Fuyang Eco Park in Taipei and Barclay Memorial Park in Tainan, it is possible to implement Community-Based Conservation in urban areas. However, compared with rural and indigenous areas, there are more participators in urban areas. It costs more to make them coordinate and communicate with each other well. Consequently, it is very important to inspire the locals to participate in Community-Based Conservation. In these two cases, both Neighborhood magistrates construct the model by mobilizing the residents, communicating with different participators such as the government, non-profit organizations, and reducing the cost of their participation. The relationship between the government, non-profit organizations and the residents in the process of Community-Based Conservation will affect the fulfillment in urban areas.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 共享性資源管理的公私合作\n 第一節 合產在管理資源的實踐..........................1\n 第二節 研究架構......................................5\n 第三節 研究方法......................................7\n 第四節 章節安排.....................................11\n\n第二章 合產、地方治理與社基保育\n 第一節 合產的優劣...................................13\n 第二節 社基保育:地方自治與合產的結合...............15\n 第三節 不同行動者在社基保育中的角色及功能...........23\n 第四節 公園:資源管理制度的具體實踐.................26\n\n第三章 兩個公園的故事\n 第一節 富陽自然生態公園:「繁華都市的原始森林」.....29\n 第二節 巴克禮紀念公園:「三到五十七的奇蹟」.........44\n 第三節 小結.........................................60\n\n第四章 案例分析\n 第一節 規劃權、使用權的分與合:參與者的競合關係.....62\n 第二節 社區領導者及居民集體參與之關係...............65\n 第三節 都市社區對社基保育的影響:說保育太沈重.......69\n 第四節 小結.........................................72\n\n第五章 結論\n 第一節 研究發現.....................................74\n 第二節 研究限制.....................................77\n 第三節 未來研究方向.................................80\n\n參考文獻..............................................82\n附錄一 訪談大綱......................................94\n附錄二 富陽自然生態公園大事紀.......................100\n附錄三 巴克禮紀念公園大事紀.........................102\n\n圖表目次 \n\n圖 1 本研究之研究架構.................................6\n表 1 深度訪談受訪者基本資料..........................10\n圖 2 社區與保育行動間的結合..........................19\n圖 3-1富陽自然生態公園位置圖..........................30\n圖 3-2巴克禮紀念公園位置圖............................45\n圖 5 修正後之研究架構................................77zh_TW
dc.format.extent104181 bytes-
dc.format.extent181962 bytes-
dc.format.extent124769 bytes-
dc.format.extent77342 bytes-
dc.format.extent129110 bytes-
dc.format.extent301915 bytes-
dc.format.extent346032 bytes-
dc.format.extent1225154 bytes-
dc.format.extent260937 bytes-
dc.format.extent204228 bytes-
dc.format.extent260658 bytes-
dc.format.extent203190 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095252010en_US
dc.subject合產zh_TW
dc.subject社基保育zh_TW
dc.subject里長zh_TW
dc.subject富陽自然生態公園zh_TW
dc.subject巴克禮紀念公園zh_TW
dc.subjectCoproductionen_US
dc.subjectCommunity-Based Conservationen_US
dc.subjectNeighborhood magistratesen_US
dc.subjectFuyang Eco Parken_US
dc.subjectBarclay Memorial Parken_US
dc.title都市中的保育行動:以富陽公園與巴克禮公園的社區參與為例zh_TW
dc.titleUrban community-based conservation:the case of Fuyang and Barclay parksen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceA. 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAgrawal, Arun and Clark C. Gibson. 1999. “Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation.” World Development, 27(4): 629-649.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerkes, Fikret. 2003. “Rethinking Community-Based Conservation.” Conservation Biology, 18(3): 621-630.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarmin, Joann. 2003. “Nongovernmental Organizations and Public Participation in Local Environmental Decision-Making in the Czech Republic.”Local Environment, 8(5): 541-552.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCollier, David and James Mahoney. 1996. “Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias in Qualitative Research.” World Politics, 49(1): 56-91.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCollins, Harry and Trevor Pinch. 1998. “The Science of Lambs: Chernobyl and the Cumbrian Sheepfarmers.” The Golem at Large. NY: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDahl, Robert. 1985. A Preface to Economy Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDahl, Robert. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven, Conn. Yale University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDaneke, Gregory A. 1980. “The Future of Environmental protection: Reflection on the Difference between Planning and Regulating.” Public Administration Review, 42(3): 227-233.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceElazar, Daniel J. 1998. “State-Local Relation: Union and Home Rule.” in Governing Partners: State-Local Relations in the United States, edited by Hanson, Russell L, Boulder. CO: Westview Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEvans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: State and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFenno, Richard. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFischer, Frank. 2000. Citizen, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGerring, John. 2004. “What is a Case Study and What is it Good For?” American Political Science Review, 98(2): 341-354.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHardin, Garrett. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science, 162(3859): 1243-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHirschman, Albert. O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Mass Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohn, Peter. 2001. Local Governance in Western Europe. London: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJorgensen, Danny. L. 1989. Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKlooster, Daniel. 2000. “Institutional Choice, Community, and Struggle: A Case Study of Forest Co-Management in Mexico.” World Development, 28(1): 1-20zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLittle, Peter. D. 1994. “The Link between Local Participation and Improved Conservation: A Review Issues and Experiences.” in Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarschall, Melissa J. 2004. ”Citizen Participation and the Neighborhood Context: A New Look at the Coproduction of Local Public Goods.” Political Research Quarterly, 57(2): 231-244.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMosley, Cassandra. 2003. ”Constrained Democracy: Evaluating Community-Based Conservation Using Environmental Outcomes.” Paper presented at the CBCRC National Workshop on \"Evaluating Methods and Environmental Outcomes of Community Based Collaborative Processes.” Snowbird Center, Utah.http://www.cbcrc.org/2003speakerpapers/Moseley-constraineddemo.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNice, David, C. 1998. “The Intergovernmental Setting of State-Local Relation.” in Governing Partners: State-Local Relations in the United States, edited by Hanson, Russell L. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNorth, Douglas. C. 1990. Institution, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. UK: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOliver, J. Eric. 1999. “Civic Involvement in Suburbia: The Effects of Metropolitan Economic Segregation on Participation in Local Civic Affairs.” American Journal of Political Science, 43 (January): 186-212.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOlson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOstrom, Elinor. 1988. “Institutional Arrangements and the Commons Dilemma.” in Rethinking Institutional Analysis and Development: Issues, Alternatives, and Choices, edited by Ostrom, Vincent, David Feeny, and Hartmut Picht. San Francisco: International Center for Economic Growth.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOstrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOstrom, Elinor. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073-1087.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOstrom, Elinor. 2002. “The Type of Good and Collective Action”, Paper presented at the Mancur Olson Memorial Lectures series, the University of Maryland,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCollege Park. http://www.bsos.umd.edu/umccc/ostrom.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOstrom, Vincent, Robert Bish and Elinor Ostrom. 1988. Local Government in the United States. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePutnam Robert, D. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America`s Declining Social Capital” Journal of Democracy, 6(January): 65-78.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRosenberg, Elissa. 1996. “Public Works and Public Space: Rethinking the Urban Park.” Journal of Architectural Education, 50(2): 89-103.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShuman, Michael .H. 1998. Going Local: Crating Self-Reliant Communities in a Global Age. NY: The Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTai, Hsing-Sheng. 2007. “Development through Conservation: An Institutional Analysis of Indigenous Community-Based Conservation in Taiwan.” World Development, 35(7): 1186-1203.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWalker, Peter and Fortmann, Louise. 2003. “Whose Landscape? A Political Ecology of the Exurban Sierra.” Cultural Geographies, 10(4): 469-491.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeigle, Marcia. A. and Jim. Butterfield. 1992. “Civil Society in Reforming Communist Regimes: The Logic of Emergency.” Comparative Politics, 25(1): 1-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeir, Margaret. 1999. “Power, Money, and Politics in Community Development.” in Urban Problems and Community Development. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWestern, David, Shirley. Carol Strum and M. Right. Wright, 1994, Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilson, James. Q. 1974. Political Organization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYin, Robert. K. 1984. Case study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceB. 中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王求是、高峰譯,1992,Rutledge, Albert. J. 著,《大眾行為與公園設計》(A Visual Approach to Park Design, 1st ed.),台北:建築與文化出版社,初版(原書於1985年出版)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王俊秀,1994,〈以社區發展解決環境問題:論社區環保鐵三角模式〉,《社區發展季刊》,66:14-19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王俊秀,1999,《全球變遷與變遷全球—環境社會學的觀點》,台北:巨流,初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王振寰,1996,《誰統治台灣?轉型中的國家機器與權力結構》,台北:巨流,初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王順美、沈珊珊,1999,〈自發性社區環境行動個案探討〉,《師大學報》,44(1 &2)(合刊號):17–30。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王順美、葉燕燕,1998,〈社區環境行動及其環境教育意義—以83年度台北市十大環保社區為例〉,《公共衛生》,25(2):93-104。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王麗容,1991,〈民間環保組織在社區環保活動中的角色與功能〉,《社區發展季刊》,56:127-131。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江大樹,張力亞,2008,〈社區營造中組織信任的機制建構:以桃米生態村為例〉,《東吳政治學報》,26(1):87-141。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江宜樺,1995,〈「政治是什麼?」-試析亞里斯多德的觀點〉,《台灣社會研究》,19:165-194。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference牟迎馨,1999,〈另類休閒觀 李鎰蔡 鄭桶生 一個自告奮勇當園丁 一個雞婆當巡山員 老哥兒們 聯手打造生態公園〉,《民生報》,民88年6月26日,版19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院文化建設委員會,1999,《台灣社區總體營造政策發展的軌跡》,台北:行政院文化建設委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference何明修,2007,〈公民社會的限制—台灣環境政治中的結社藝術〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,4(2):33-65。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳函芸、王莉萍,2000,〈富陽公園發展史〉,《走入富陽》,http://www1.taes.tp.edu.tw/2460/www5/走入富陽全書網/web/home.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(檢索日期:2008年12月20日)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳明良,2000,〈運河弊案 張燦鍙求刑12年〉,《聯合報》,民89年8月26日,版1。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳明良,2006,〈副都心台糖土地 切割開發〉,《聯合報》,民95年8月25日,版C2。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳明良,2008,〈偷鵝二婦 將派赴巴克禮勞動〉,聯合報,民97年5月13日,版C2。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳涵宜,2003,《社區環境改造中民眾參與程度之探討-以「溫州公園」與「福林社區」為例》,台北:臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂理德、許哲彥,2007,〈台灣永續社區發展情況初探:以國家社區永續發展講得獎社區為例〉,《都市治理與地方永續發展》,劉阿榮主編,台北縣:揚智文化,初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李麗雪譯,1997,Rutledge, Albert. J. 著,《公園的剖析》(Anatomy of a Park,1st ed.),台北:麥格羅希爾出版社,初版(原書於1971年出版)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference汪文豪、周維新,2004,〈樹蛙棲地闢步道 公園處長道歉〉,《聯合報》,民93年10月20日,版C2。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林易萱,2009,〈政府與社區公私協營增效的可能—以金瓜石的觀光產業為例〉,發表於第十五屆全國公共行政博碩士生論文發表會,台北:政治大學公共行政研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林管洛,2006,《村里長對於社區認同的影響—以台南縣社造村里為案例》,台南:立德管理學院地區發展管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference祁止戈,1998,〈富陽街森林公園有譜了 原屬軍方彈藥庫林相保持完整已獲同意開放〉,《中國時報》,民87年2月23日,版C1。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference祁止戈,1998,〈富陽街森林公園初步規劃完成〉,《中國時報》,民87年3月4日,版C2。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference柯于璋,2005,〈社區主義治理模式之理論與實踐--兼論台灣地區社區政策〉,《公共行政學報》,16:33-57。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪得娟,1998,〈都市公園綠地景觀意象評估之研究〉,《植栽、生態與保育》,中華民國造園學會、台灣大學園藝系主編,台北:田園城市文化事業有限公司出版,初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference紀駿傑、蕭新煌,2006,《臺灣全志:卷九社會志 環境與社會篇》,南投市:臺灣文獻館,初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference唐億營造公司著,2005,《大安四○八號公園新建工程委託規劃、設計及施工統包工程》規劃書,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference翁順利,2005,〈巴克禮公園 豐富生態成書〉,《中國時報》,民94年8月16日,版C5。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference荒野保護協會,2006,〈定點觀察的意義〉zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.sow.org.tw/observe/index.htm。(檢索日期:2008年1月23日)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference荒野保護協會,2007,《富陽自然生態導覽地圖》,民96年12月1日出刊。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference荒野保護協會,2007,搶救翠湖行動記錄,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://home.sow.org.tw/sowshihu/greenlake/gl_savefirebug1.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(檢索日期:2009年6月19日)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高一中譯,2006,Meadows, Donella. Jorgen Randers, and Dennis Meadows 著,《成長的極限:三十週年最新增訂版》(The limits to growth the 30-year update)。 台北市:臉譜出版,初版(原書於2005年出版)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高鴻飛,1998,〈上午五時至下午七時 富陽街森林公園,彈性開放〉,《聯合報》,民87年5月14日,版19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高鴻飛,1998,〈富陽街彈藥庫 決闢森林公園〉,《聯合報》,民87年1月15日,版C3。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莊雅仲,2005a,〈五餅二魚 社區運動與都市生活〉,《社会学研究》,116:176-197。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許添籌等,2006,《富陽自然生態公園導覽手冊》,台北市:臺北市工務局公園路燈工程管理處出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳文俊,1998,〈永續發展與民主:審議式民主理論初探〉,《東吳政治學報》,9:85-122。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳向明,2002,《社會科學質的研究》,台北市:五南,初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳怡君,2006,《村里與社區發展協會關係之研究-以台中縣市為例》,台中:東海大學政治學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳恆鈞,1996,(行政革新與市民參與:公園認養業務之探討〉,《中國行政評論》,5(4):146-162。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference富陽大事記,http://fuyang.idv.tw/xoops2/instpage.php?r=&w=100%&h=800&url=fuyang.idv.tw/xoops2/webpage/planning_record.html。(檢索日期:2008年12月20日)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference富陽自然生態公園位置圖,http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3282/3037862222_957155b849_o.jpg。(檢索日期:2009年4月6日)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference湯京平,2001,〈民主治理與環境保護—從中埔慈濟案檢視我國資源回收的政策體系〉,《台灣政治學刊》,5:178-217。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference湯京平、呂嘉泓,2002,〈永續發展與公共行政─從山美與里佳經驗談社區自治與「共享性資源」的管理〉,《人文社會科學集刊》,14(2):1-28。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference湯京平、邱崇原,2007,〈多元民主、政治吸納與政策回應:從台鹼污染案檢視台灣環保公益團體的政策角色〉,《人文與社會科學集刊》,19(1):93-127。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃麗玲,2003,〈全球過程、地方政治及鄰里回應:以台北市的參與式計畫為例〉,《台大地理學報:全球化台北專輯》,34:61-77。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊珮君,1998,〈富陽街底有座「秘密公園」森林公園生態豐富居民力爭保存原貌〉,《中國時報》,民87年12月19日,版C2。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊清雄,2003,〈北市富陽公園 也傳老樹被砍 議員籲文化局加強樹口普查及教育宣導〉,《民生報》,民92年7月30日,版A4。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊淑芬,2007,〈荒野變公園 志工勞苦功高〉,《中國時報》,民96年9月1日,版C1。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉重利等著,2006,《巴克禮紀念公園》,台南企業藝術文化基金會,初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉重利等著,2008,《四季迷戀》,台南企業藝術文化基金會,初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference詹三源,2003,〈富陽公園 大自然教室前是彈藥庫 生態豐富 8月完工〉,《聯合報》,民95年2月8日,版C2。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference詹家龍,1998,〈繁華都市的原始森林〉,《民生報》,民87年5月15日,版41。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference管佩鈺,2007,《社基保育與溼地主義之困境:台灣濕地保育聯盟之洲仔濕地的保育》,嘉義:中正大學政治研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺北市工務局公園路燈工程管理處,2004,北市工公藝字第09363905300號,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference〈「大安408號公園新建工程前期規劃暨生態資源調查、監測」案生態資源調查、監測第二期暨現地測量與前期規劃第三期報告簡報會議紀錄〉,民國93年12月9日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺北市工務局公園路燈工程管理處,2004,北市公工藝字第0946391300號,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference〈「大安408號公園新建工程前期規劃暨生態資源調查、監測第二年」第一期簡報會議紀錄〉,民國94年11月25日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺北市工務局公園路燈工程管理處,富陽自然生態公園簡介,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://pkl.taipei.gov.tw/cgi-bin/SM_theme?page=4383c1ca。(檢索日期:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2008年12月23日)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺北市政府,2000,府都二字第8907609700號,〈變更臺北市大安區辛亥段zh_TW
dc.relation.reference四小段416-11、416-14、490、490-7(保護區)及490-6(第三類住宅區)地號土地為公園用地計畫案〉,民國89年8月31日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺北市政府都市發展局,2002,《台北新市紀:二十一世紀台北都市空間改造運動-地區環境改造計畫》,臺北市,臺北市都市發展局出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺北市選舉委員會,1994,《第七屆臺北市里長選舉實錄》,臺北市:臺北市選舉委員會出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺北市選舉委員會,1998,《第八屆臺北市里長選舉實錄》,臺北市:臺北市選舉委員會出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺北市選舉委員會,2003,《第九屆臺北市里長選舉實錄》,臺北市:臺北市選舉委員會出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺北市議會公報76(7),http://tcckm.tcc.gov.tw/tccgazFront/search/search_simple.jsp。(檢索日期:2009年1月8日)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺南市政府,〈縣市綜合發展計畫報告書—臺南市東區部分〉,民國79年8月15日。http://cpis.tainan.gov.tw/cprpts/tainan_city/record/proces-2.htm。(檢索 日期:2009年4月23日)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺南市政府,2003,《九十二年臺南市統計要覽》,http://www.tncg.gov.tw/warehouse/0708/92totalstat.pdf。(檢索日期:2009年4月3日)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺南市崇明國民中學,巴克禮紀念公園位置圖。 http://www.cmjh.tn.edu.tw/barclay/green.htm。(檢索日期:2009年4月6日)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺南市選舉委員會,1998,《臺南市第十六屆里長選舉選務總報告》,臺南市:臺灣省臺南市選舉委員會出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺南市選舉委員會,2002,《臺南市第十七屆里長選舉選務總報告》,臺南市:臺灣省臺南市選舉委員會出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺南市選舉委員會,2006,《臺南市第18屆里長選舉曁南區文華里重行選舉選務總報告》,臺南市:臺灣省臺南市選舉委員會出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference趙家麟,2003,〈巴克禮紀念公園 揭幕〉,《中國時報》,民92年6月8日,版C4。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference趙家麟,2003,〈還我綠地 社區脫胎換骨 整頓巴克禮紀念公園 帶來連串奇蹟〉,《中國時報》,民92年7月26日,版C4。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉柏宏,2006,〈參與式規劃設計 專業者應有的態度〉,http://publish.tpc.gov.tw/housing/tsp/95document/bc15.pdf。(檢索日期:2009年4月8日)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡育軒、陳怡君、王業立,2007,〈社區發展協會、選舉動員與地方政治〉,《東吳政治學報》,25(4):93-135。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡厚男、蔡淑婷,1998,〈生物多樣性與都市景觀生態規劃管理〉,《植栽、生態與保育》,中華民國造園學會、台灣大學園藝系主編,台北:田園城市文化事業有限公司出版,初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡惠萍,2003,〈富陽森林公園 老樹腰斬〉,《聯合報》,民92年7月30日,版B2。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭朝陽,2008,〈《台灣希望地圖 播種理想 堅持行動》 巴克禮公園 居民自覺 清空垃圾山 還我生態公園〉,《聯合報》,民97年3月31日,版A6。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧道杰,2004,〈台灣社區保育的發展 近年來國內三個個案的分析〉,《地理學報》,37:1-25。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference戴安瑋,2003,〈砍老樹 軍方挨刮 軍方說樹倒壓毀路邊停車 民眾不滿〉,《聯合晚報》,民92年7月29日,版11。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference戴興盛,2007,〈反思經濟誘因、自然保育與集體行動〉,《環境教育研究》,5(1):1-39。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference薛荷玉,2004,〈森林公園「鋪地毯」變客廳? 蟬絕後、樹枯死樹蛙棲地遭侵襲 保育團體籲政府公告禁止破壞生態〉,《民生報》,民93年10月20日,版A1。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference譚鴻仁,2003,〈公、私之間:由一個私有財公有化的例子看公共領域的變動〉,《地理學報》,34:79-94。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇位榮,2005,〈施治明收賄 判8年半定讞〉,《聯合報》,民94年7月8日,版A8。zh_TW
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
201001.pdf101.74 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201002.pdf177.7 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201003.pdf121.84 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201004.pdf75.53 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201005.pdf126.08 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201006.pdf294.84 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201007.pdf337.92 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201008.pdf1.2 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201009.pdf254.82 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201010.pdf199.44 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201011.pdf254.55 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201012.pdf198.43 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.