Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51690
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor吳政達zh_TW
dc.contributor.author陳治堯zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chih Yaoen_US
dc.creator陳治堯zh_TW
dc.creatorChen, Chih Yaoen_US
dc.date2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-14T05:42:58Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-14T05:42:58Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-14T05:42:58Z-
dc.identifierG0097171004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51690-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description教育行政與政策研究所zh_TW
dc.description97171004zh_TW
dc.description99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在探討影響國際學生流動的拉力因素構面,並找出台灣大學院校對大陸學生的主要拉力因素為何,以做為未來政策制定和大學院校招生之參考。經過文獻探討之後發現國際學生流動的拉力因素有八個構面,分別是學校機構、留學政策、國際競爭力、地理環境、經濟、社會文化、家庭與體制因素。研究方法的部分,利用專家問卷進行問卷試題的適切性評估,再使用因素分析與信度分析法,確立問卷各因素構面試題並取得良好的信度,並利用網路問卷調查法進行正式問卷施測,共計386位填答者,有效填答有286位。研究分析使用描述性統計、獨立樣本t考驗和單因子變異數分析,來探討我國大學院校對於大陸學生的拉力因素排序情形與不同背景變項間的差異程度。根據分析結果,歸納出本研究之結論如下:\r\n一、留學政策的制定是台灣吸引陸生的最主要拉力。\r\n二、台灣的文化與大學特色是吸引陸生的重要拉力。\r\n三、男性在留學政策因素上認同度高。\r\n四、商業管理的學生在留學政策因素上的認同度較農業及醫藥學的學生高。\r\n五、有來台經驗的學生在學校機構與體制因素上的認同度較高。\r\n六、經濟因素會因學生是本科生或研究生而有所差異。\r\n最後,根據本研究之結論,對於台灣大學院校、教育行政主管機關和未來研究提出建議,以制定相關招生策略、政策規定或是未來研究方向。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to explore the dimension of the pull factors of international student mobility, and discover the main pull factors of Taiwan higher educational institutes, in order to make proper future policies and strategies for recruiting students from mainland China. Through literature review, this study finds that there are eight dimensions of pull factors which are dimension of educational institutes, dimension of study-abroad policy, dimension of international competitiveness, dimension of environment, dimension of economics, dimension of socio-culture, dimension of family, and dimension of national system. As for research methods, using expert questionnaire, factor analysis and reliability analysis to ensure all questions are well-stated and get good degree of reliability, and then using web-based questionnaire to do the survey. In this study, there are 386 respondents, and 286 of them are valid. By means of descriptive statistics, independent t-test and one-way ANOVA, the order of the pull factor and the differences between every background variables are found. According to the results, the main conclusions are as follows:\r\n1.The making of study-abroad policy is the main pull factor of Taiwan for students from mainland China.\r\n2.The characteristics of Taiwanese culture and universities are important pull factors.\r\n3.Male shows higher degree of agreement in the dimension of study-abroad policy factors.\r\n4.Students of business and management show higher degree of agreement in the dimension of study-abroad policy factors than students of agriculture and medical science.\r\n5.Students who have experiences in Taiwan show higher degree of agreement in the dimension of educational institutes and national system factors.\r\n6.Undergraduate students and graduate students show different degree of agreement in the dimension of economics factors.\r\nIn the end, based on the conclusion of this study, some suggestions had been proposed to Taiwan educational institutes, educational administration authority and future research, in order to make appropriate policies, strategies, or research direction.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\r\n第一節 研究動機 1\r\n第二節 研究目的與待答問題 7\r\n第三節 重要名詞解釋 8\r\n第四節 研究方法 9\r\n第五節 研究範圍與限制 11\r\n第二章 文獻探討 13\r\n第一節 國際學生流動與推拉力理論之相關研究 13\r\n第二節 留學國之相關拉力因素研究 26\r\n第三節 大陸地區留學政策之發展與現況 37\r\n第四節 台灣對開放陸生來台就讀之相關教育政策 49\r\n第三章 研究設計與實施 57\r\n第一節 研究架構 57\r\n第二節 研究對象 60\r\n第三節 研究工具 68\r\n第四節 實施程序 80\r\n第五節 資料處理與分析 82\r\n第四章 研究結果與討論 85\r\n第一節 台灣大學院校拉力因素重要程度分析 85\r\n第二節 不同背景變項之拉力因素項目排序差異分析 95\r\n第三節 不同背景變項對拉力因素的認知差異分析 106\r\n第五章 結論與建議 121\r\n第一節 結論 121\r\n第二節 建議 125\r\n參考文獻 129\r\n附件 136zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097171004en_US
dc.subject國際學生流動zh_TW
dc.subject推拉力理論zh_TW
dc.subject留學國zh_TW
dc.subjectinternational student mobilityen_US
dc.subjectpush-pull theoryen_US
dc.subjecthost countryen_US
dc.title陸生來台就讀大學院校之拉力因素分析zh_TW
dc.titleThe analysis of the pull factors of Taiwan higher educational institutes of students from mainland Chinaen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference大陸委員會(2008)。「延長陸生來臺研修期限為一年」及「放寛大學赴大陸及金門馬祖辦理推廣教育」方案。2010年04月02日,取自於http://www.mac.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=44953&ctNode=5652&mp=1zh_TW
dc.relation.reference大陸委員會(2010)。大陸地區人士來臺從事文教交流核准數2009年第4季。2010年04月02日,取自於http://www.mac.gov.tw/public/Data/01211803371.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference中國教育年鑑編輯部編(2008)。中國教育年鑑。北京:人民教育。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中國教育改革與發展課題組(2008)。教育大國的崛起1978-2008。北京:教育科學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference內政部統計處(2009)。重要內政統計指標。台北:內政部。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王堯(2009年07月23日)。游學台灣,陸生感受如何?。人民網。取自http://tw.people.com.cn/BIG5/14811/14871/9706508.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference方剛(2010年11月19日)。陸生補助,給台灣帶來了什麼。旺e報。取自http://www.want-daily.com/News/Content.aspx?id=0&yyyymmdd=20101119&k=17915aed7bb9a81196139f84ceafb832&h=c6f057b86584942e415435ffb1fa93d4&nid=K@20101119@N0174.001zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李仁豪、余民寧(2010)。網路與紙本調查方式、網路問卷長短、網路問卷一題熟悉度高低的DIF分析及潛在平均數差異。教育與心理研究,33(2),111-140。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李建興(2008)。臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例、大學法及專科學校法修正方向。2010年04月03日,取自於http://www.npf.org.tw/post/3/5219zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李建興(2009)。大陸學歷採認規劃及配套措施。2010年04月02日,取自於http://www.npf.org.tw/post/3/6742zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李建興(2010)。陸生三法通過後招收陸生措施。2010年11月20日,擷取自http://www.npf.org.tw/post/3/8000zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李曜丞(2009年06月9日)。嶺東交換生/陸生愛台灣 瘋媽祖逛故宮。聯合報。取自http://mag.udn.com/mag/campus/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=198317zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳政達、湯家偉(2009)。從國際學生流動趨勢分析開放陸生來臺就學政策。教育研究月刊,187,75-82。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳政達(2008)。教育政策分析:概念、方法與應用。台北:高等教育。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂筱蟬(2010年11月20日)。番仔田夜祭 陸生看得入迷。聯合新聞網。取自http://udn.com/NEWS/DOMESTIC/DOM5/5985409.shtmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference林奇伯(2010年3月)。賭一個更有競爭力的未來:6755名台生在大陸。遠見雜誌,3,164-179。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference岳經綸(2002)。教育市場化趨勢下之大陸高等教育與政府關係。載於戴曉霞、莫家豪、謝安邦(主編),高等教育市場化:台、港、中趨勢之比較(286-295頁)。台北市:高等教育。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莫家豪、戴曉霞(2002)。全球化、市場化與高等教育:東亞地區發展趨勢。載於戴曉霞、莫家豪、謝安邦(主編),高等教育市場化:台、港、中趨勢之比較(286-295頁)。台北市:高等教育。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部(2008)。促進兩岸文教交流,放寬陸生來臺研修及大學赴大陸辦理推廣教育。2010年04月02日,取自於http://www.edu.tw/print.aspx?table_name=news&table_sn=2141zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部(2009a)。大專院校校數統計。台北:教育部。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部(2009b)。我國學生赴主要留學國家簽證人數統計表。台北:教育部。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部(2010a)。教育統計99年版。台北:教育部。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部(2010b)。教育部針對大陸學生來臺研修之政策立場。2010年04月02日,取自於http://www.edu.tw/news.aspx?news_sn=3297zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部(2010c)。開放大陸學歷採認與陸生來臺就學政策規劃及配套措施公聽會。2010年04月01日,取自於http://www.mac.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=72846&ctNode=5630&mp=1zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部(2010d)。教育部針對民進黨民調中心公布民調52.2%民眾反對承認大陸學歷之回應說明 。2010年04月03日,取自於http://www.edu.tw/news.aspx?news_sn=3139&pages=0zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部中等教育司(2010)。「僑」一個教師夢,想當老師的看過來。2010年11月21日,擷取自http://www.edu.tw/news.aspx?news_sn=3665zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部高教司(2010a)。陸生三法修正草案三讀通過。2010年11月15日,取自http://www.edu.tw/news.aspx?news_sn=3794zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部高教司(2010b)。臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例第22條修正條文對照表。2010年11月10日取自http://www.edu.tw/news.aspx?news_sn=3794zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部統計處(2009)。教育統計99年版。台北:教育部。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳智華、薛荷玉(2010年8月20日)。不溯既往 教育部承認41所大陸學校。聯合新聞網。取自http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NATS3/5797197.shtmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳映竹(2010年11月12日)。私校:陸生來台 學費高於本地生。中時電子報。取自http://news.chinatimes.com/politics/0,5244,50205010x132010111200877,00.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference曹筱靜、果蕾、王靜(2010)。赴台留學-你想過嗎?。高教技職簡訊,41。取自http://www.news.high.edu.tw/news041/2010051001.asp?c=0600&vers=042zh_TW
dc.relation.reference程方平(主編)(2002)。中國教育問題報告-入事背景下中國教育的現實問題和基本對策。北京:中國社會科學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference游森期、余民寧(2006)。網路問卷與傳統問卷之比較:多樣本均等性方法學之應用。測驗學刊,53(1),103-128。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊朝祥、徐明珠(2008)。台灣高等教育指標國際化之比較研究。2010年03月29日,取自於http://www.npf.org.tw/particle.php?sid=4602&topic=2zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊景堯(1999)。中國大陸留學政策之研究。輯於中華民國比較教育學會(主編),教育研究與政策之國際比較(頁397-420)。台北市:揚智文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉芷妘(2010年11月7日)。台生看陸生 對政治很敏感。中國時報,A5版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉彥妤、牛貞懿、呂沛軒、徐培倫(2010年10月28日)。陸生交換在政大 兩岸教育新體驗。公民新聞平台。取自http://www.peopo.org/portal.php?op=viewPost&articleId=68385zh_TW
dc.relation.reference戴曉霞(2006)。世紀一流大學之卓越與創新。台北:高等教育。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭霖、馮丰儀(2006)。大學國際化指標之研究。教育資料與研究,68,119-136。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAltbach, P. G. (1991). Impact and adjustment: Foreign students in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 21(3), 305-323.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAltbach, P. G. (2004, March-April). Higher education crosses border. Retrieved from http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/publications/pub_pdf/Student%20_flows.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBennel, P., & Pearce, T. (2003). The internationalisation of higher education: Exporting education to developing and transitional economies. International Journal of Educational Development, 23, 215-232.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBirnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803-822.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrennan, J., & Teichler, U. (2008). The future of higher education and of higher education research. Higher Education, 56, 259-264.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCremonini, L., & Antonowicz, D. (2009). In the eye of the beholder? Conceptualizing academic attraction in the global higher education market. European Education, 41(2), 52-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDowner, A. (2005). Australia`s Export Success in Education [Electronic Version]. Retrieved March 29, 2010, from http://www.foreignminister.gov.au/releases/2005/joint_nelson_070905.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJie, Y. (2007). Internationalization in Chinese higher education: Policy analysis through a theoretical framework review. Pacific Asian Education, 19(1), 58-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLarsen, K., Martin, J. P., & Morris, R. (2002). Trade in educational service: Trends and emerging issues. The World Economy, 25, 849-868.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLi, M., & Bray, M. (2007). Cross-border flows of students for higher education: Push-pull factors and motivations of mainland Chinese students in Hong Kong and Macau. Higher Education, 53, 791-818.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarginson, S. (2004). National and global competition in higher education. The Australian Educational Researcher, 31(2), 1-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52, 1-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMazzarol, T., Kemp, S., & Savery, L. (1997). International students who choose not to study in Australia: An examination of Taiwan and Indonesia. Canberra: Australian International Education Foundation.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMazzarol, T. W. (1998). Critical success factors for international education marketing. International Journal of Education Management, 12(4), 163-175.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMazzarol, T. W., & Soutar, G. N. (1999). China demand for international education: Social and policy implications for Australia. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 5(1), 34-45.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (2002). Push-pull factors influencing international student destination choice. The International Journal of Educational Management, 16(2), 82-90.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNaidoo, V. (2007). Research on the flow of international students to UK universities determinants and implications. Journal of Research in International Education, 6(3), 287-307.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOECD (2006). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOECD (2009a). Education at a glance. Paris: OECD.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOECD (2009b). English and French Glossary. Retrieved April 2, 2010, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/44/7/43642148.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSauve, P. (2002). Trade, Education and the GATS: What’s In, What’s Out, What’s All the Fuss About? OECD/US Forum on Trade in Educational Services. Washington, D.C.USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSrikatanyoo, N., & Gnoth, J. (2002). Country image and international tertiary education. Journal of Brand Management, 10(2), 139-146.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTeichler, U., & Steube, W. (1991). The logics of study abroad programmes and their impacts. Higher education, 21(3), 325-349.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVan Damme, D. (2001). Quality issues in the internationalisation of higher education. Higher Education, 41, 415-441.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencevan der Wende, M. C. (2001). Internationalisation policies: About new trends and contrasting paradigms. Higher Education Policy, 14, 249-259.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWanger, A., & Schnitzer, K. (1991). Programmes and policies for foreign students and study abroad: The search for effective approaches in a new global setting. Higher Education, 21(3), 275-288.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYang, M. (2007). What attracts mainland Chinese students to Australian higher education. Studies in Learning, Evaluation Innovation and Development, 4(5), 1-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYao, L. (2004, September). The Chinese overseas students: An overview of the flows change. Paper prepared for the 12th Biennial Conference of the Australian Population Association, Canberra.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZhao, M., & Wildemeersch, D. (2008). Hosting foreign students in European universities: International and intercultural perspective. European Education, 40(1), 51-62.zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
http___thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw_cgi-bin_gs32_gsweb16.pdf3.47 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.