Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52820
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor傅立葉zh_TW
dc.contributor.author吳姿瑩zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorWu,Tzu,Yingen_US
dc.creator吳姿瑩zh_TW
dc.creatorWu,Tzu,Yingen_US
dc.date2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-17T01:26:42Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-17T01:26:42Z-
dc.date.issued2012-04-17T01:26:42Z-
dc.identifierG0982640111en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52820-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description社會工作研究所zh_TW
dc.description98264011zh_TW
dc.description100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在探討是否是因女性意識的抬頭,導致台灣生育率下降,還是誠如Peter McDonald(2000)所言,由於婦女運動,導致社會允許女性在教育與就業上擁有等同於男性的機會,其稱之為個人取向制度上的性別平等,但在家庭方面,卻仍是維持男主外、女主內的傳統男性養家者模式思考,認為女性為家庭中的顧老者、護幼者,其稱之為家庭取向制度上的性別不平等,以致於女性要面對家庭照顧與工作壓力的雙重負擔,但這樣的現象並不會對女性的理想子女數造成影響,卻會使實際生育數下降;研究工具為2004年國民健康局「家庭與生育力調查」第九次調查已婚問卷資料,有效樣本數為2,865人。\n研究結果發現,擁有較平等的性別角色態度之已婚育齡婦女,的確有較低的理想子女數與實際生育數,但依照描述性統計狀況來看,我國婦女並非不想生育,而是降低了自己的理想子女數與實際生育數;而我國家庭內家務分工不均的狀況,雖不符合研究者假設家務分工平等的女性有較高的實際生育數,但是深入探討發現,我國社會現況確實符合Peter McDonald(2000)所說,因為女性意識覺醒,促使社會處理個人在教育與就業上的制度性別平等,但我國社會家庭制度仍是維持傳統男性養家者模式,要求女性負擔家庭中絕大部分家務工作,欠缺顧老、護幼之協調工作與家庭照顧政策,以至於女性無法負擔工作與家庭衝突,因而降低了自己的生育數。\n最後,研究者依研究發現嘗試對政府部門提出相關建議,供未來家庭政策與實務參考。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to know the reason for fertility decline of the married women aged in 20-49 years in Taiwan. Whether it is due to the rise of feminist consciousness, or as the theory Peter McDonald (2000) discussed. Peter McDonald thinks that since women’s movement are springing up, the society allows women to have the same opportunities like men in education and employment. He called it as gender equal in individual-oriented institutions. But in fact, it is still maintaining the traditional male breadwinner model in the family. Female still plays the main role to take care children and elders. He called it as gender inequity in family-oriented institutions. Such institutions lead to fertility decline. The data used for this study were from 2004“the ninth investigation of family and fertility ability in Taiwan ”held by the research Institute of Bureau of health promotion department of health, Taiwan R.O.C. (sample size=2865).\nThe main finding of this study is to prove that the married women in childbearing age, who has more egalitarian gender role attitude, will have lower ideal number of children and the actual number of births. Based on the general statistic condition in Taiwan, the situation are similar to Peter McDonald`s thought. But there is something different, the unequal division housework is still within the family, which is not just like the researcher’s assumption: an equal division of housework women have a higher actual number of births. Despite the variable, the reason of fertility decline in Taiwan still confirms Peter McDonald’s theory. The awakening of women’s consciousness accelerate gender equal in individual-oriented and family-oriented institutions. But still, the traditional model asked women to undertake most parts of housework. The deficient in public welfare and family care policy will make female not be able to get the balance between work and family. Such institutions caused fertility decline in Taiwan.\nFinally, according to the study result, there are several suggestions which can be contributed to future policy and practical advice of family reference for government.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究背景與研究動機 1\n第二節 研究目的與研究問題 6\n第二章 文獻探討 8\n第一節 生育相關之解釋性理論 8\n第二節 我國生育率的變遷 13\n第三節 理想子女數相關實證研究 18\n第四節 實際生育數相關實證研究 26\n第三章 研究方法 32\n第一節 研究架構與研究假設 32\n第二節 資料來源與研究樣本 34\n第三節 變項之操作性定義 35\n第四節 資料分析方法 41\n第四章 資料處理與分析 42\n第一節 樣本基本特性 42\n第二節 雙變項分析 46\n第三節 迴歸分析:影響理想子女數與實際生育數之因素 55\n第五章 結論與建議 66\n第一節 研究結論 66\n第二節 政策建議 69\n第三節 研究限制與對未來研究之建議 74\n參考書目 77zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0982640111en_US
dc.subject生育zh_TW
dc.subject理想子女數zh_TW
dc.subject實際生育數zh_TW
dc.subject性別平等論zh_TW
dc.subject性別角色態度zh_TW
dc.subjectfertilityen_US
dc.subjectideal number of childrenen_US
dc.subjectthe actual number of birthsen_US
dc.subjectgender equality theoryen_US
dc.subjectgender role attitudesen_US
dc.title影響我國婦女生育之因素─性別平等之分析zh_TW
dc.titleThe factors of women`s fertility in Taiwan ─ An analysis of gender equalityen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院主計處(2000)。臺閩地區戶口及住宅普查報告。http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/0761118271.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院主計處(2003)。婦女婚育與就業調查資料。http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=11661&CtNode=3304&mp=1zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院主計處(2005)。工作與家庭。http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/88111331271.doczh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院主計處(2006)。社會發展趨勢調查─家庭概況。http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas03/ca/society/index.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院主計處(2009)。人力資源調查統計資料─歷年勞動力之年齡。zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=26553&ctNode=3247zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院主計處(2010)。受雇員工薪資調查。http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas04/bc5/earning/ht4561.aspzh_TW
dc.relation.reference內政部統計處(2009) 。育齡婦女生育率。http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference內政部統計處(2010)。非婚生子女數與婚生子女數。http://ebas1.ebas.gov.tw/pxweb/Dialog/varval.asp?ma=Po0203A1A&ti=出生、死亡統計-年&path=../PXfile/Population/&lang=9&strList=Lzh_TW
dc.relation.reference內政部統計處(2011)。一○○年第二十六週內政統計通報(99年底托育機構概況)。http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=5295zh_TW
dc.relation.reference內政部戶政司(2010)。歷年人口總數、年增加、自然增加、出生數、死亡數、結婚對數、離婚對數及比率。http://www.ris.gov.tw/version96/stpeqr_01_04.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference內政部兒童局(2005)。台閩地區兒童及少年生活狀況調查報告分析-兒童摘要版。http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/internet/main/doc/doc_sec.aspx?uid=141zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部統計處(2010)。歷年校數、教師、職員、班級、學生及畢業生數(39~99學年度)。http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=8869zh_TW
dc.relation.reference台灣省行政長官公署(1946)。台灣省51年來統計提要。http://twstudy.iis.sinica.edu.tw/twstatistic50/Pop.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference勞委會(2004)。93年婦女勞動政策滿意度調查。http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/svy93/9304menu.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference經建會(2009)。女性勞動力參與率與生育率之關聯性分析。http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0012850zh_TW
dc.relation.reference尤美女(2011)。女性意識之興起與婦女權益之保障─台灣婦女團體之角色。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference「國家人權委員會與人權的促進與保障」國際學術研討會文章。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王德睦(2009)。人口。載於瞿海源、王振寰主編(2009)。社會學與台灣社會三版。台北市:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王德睦、陳寬政(1996)。台灣地區家戶組成之推計。台灣社會學刊,19,9-33。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李美玲(1990)。台灣地區婦女的生育步調與生育轉型。人口學刊,13,145-166。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李美慧(2008)。女性勞動參與率、高等教育率、結婚率及女性失業率對台灣地區生育率之影響─以縱斷面VAR模式為實證研究。多國籍企業管理評論,2(2),93-101。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference余清祥(2004)。台灣地區各鄉鎮市區生育率的空間關係。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳碧珠(1978)。影響理想子女數因素的探討。台灣大學農業推廣學研究所,碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林宇璇、劉怡玟、林惠生(2002)。台灣婦女生育態度與行為及其轉變。人口轉型與社會、國民健康研討會之研討會論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林怡君、黃翊真(2010年1月14日)。不想生孩子!台灣生育率全球最低。華視新聞網。http://news.cts.com.tw/cts/general/201001/201001140388866.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference林秀雲(1972)。有偶婦女理想子女數的社會因素分析─鄉村與都市比較。台灣大學農業推廣學研究所,碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林佩琪(2003)。已婚婦女之子女價值、理想子女數、與性別偏好─世代觀點之比較分析。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系家政教學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林智娟(2008)。女性生育觀因素分析-以1998年之後育齡婦女為例。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱莉苓(2009年11月28日)。「平均只生1個,台灣生育率全球最低」。中央廣播電台新聞頻道。http://news.rti.org.tw/index_newsContent.aspx?nid=224826zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫得雄、陳肇男、李棟明(2001)。台灣家庭計畫之轉折與政策經驗。台灣經濟預測與政策,32,25-76。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐富珍、陳信木(2004)。蕃薯+芋頭=臺灣土豆?─臺灣當前族群認同狀況比較分析。臺灣人口學會2004年年會暨「人口、家庭與國民健康政策回顧與展望」研討會學術文章。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference涂肇慶、侯苗苗譯,John R. Weeks原著(2010)。人口學:觀念與議題。台北縣:前程文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曾國雄、吳水源(1986)。台灣地區市鎮鄉都市化程度特性之研究。師大地理研究報告,12,287-323。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張明正(1974)。台灣地區婦女理想子女數變遷與家庭計畫的實行。人與社會,6,24-29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張明正、李美慧(2001)。台灣地區人口轉型後之生育趨勢與展望。人口學刊,23,93-112。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莊慧玲(2008)。台灣低生育率現象之探討─總合資料與個體資料之實證研究。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳彥仁(2006)。台灣生育率下降因素之實證探討。國立成功大學政治經濟學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳紹馨 (1979)。台灣的人口變遷與社會變遷。台北:聯經出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳寬政、王德睦、陳文玲(1986)。台灣地區人口變遷的原因與結果。人口學刊,9,1-23。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彭台臨、黃秋珍(2005)。教育發展與婦女理想子女數的關係。東吳社會學報,19,1-22。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彭婉如基金會(2009)。家管市場 中高齡婦女就業新寵。http://pwrf.pixnet.net/blog/post/63891955zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃毅志(2003)。「台灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估:社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊,49(4),1-31。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊芸(2006)。未婚青年的子女價值與生育期望探討。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系家政教學研究所,碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊天盾(2008)。子女價值對生育期望的影響。元智大學資訊社會研究所(社會學組)碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊麗秀(1981)。台灣地區有偶育齡婦女勞動參與對生育率之影響。人口學刊,5,119-145。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference管婺媛(2011年8月15日)。台灣生育率跌破全球最低。中時電子報。http://news.chinatimes.com/focus/11050105/112011081500083.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡宏政(2007)。台灣人口政策的歷史形構。台灣社會學刊,39,65-106。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference駱明慶(2007)。台灣總生育率下降的表象與實際。研究台灣,3,37-60。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference謝文元(2011)。孩子誰來顧?台灣托育政策現況分析。http://www.children.org.tw/upload/File/researcher/3vision2-1-1.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference顧泰瑋(2007)。台灣低生育率影響因素之研究:延後生育、後物質主義與家務分工因素的檢視。中正大學社會福利研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBecker, G. S.(1960). An Economic Analysis of Fertility, Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 209-240.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNauck,B.(2007).Value of Children and the Framing of Fertility:Results from a Cross-cultural Comparative Survey in 10 Societies. European Sociological Review,23(5),615-629.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChesnais,J.C.(1996).Fertility,Family, and Social Policy in Contemporary Western Europe, Population and Development Review,22(4),729-739.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDey,I.,Wasoff,F.(2010).Another Child?Fertility Ideals, Resources and Opportunities.Popul Res Policy Rev,29,921-940.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFreedman,R.,Chang,M.C.,Sun,T.H. (1982).Household Composition, Extended Kinship, and Reproduction in Taiwan:1937-1980.Population Studies,36(3),395-411.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoldstein,J.,Lutz,W.,Testa.M.R,(2004).The Emergence of Sub-Replacement Family Size Ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review,22(5-6),479-496.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHagewen,K.J.,Morgan,S.P.(2005).Intended and Ideal Family Size in the United Stated,1970-2002. Population and Development Review,31(3),507-527.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHermalin,I.,Freedman,R.,Sun,T.H. and Chang,M.C,(1979).Do intentions predict fertility? The experience in Taiwan, 1967-74, Studies in Family Planning,10(3),75-95.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHobson,B., Olah,L.S.(2006).Birthstrikes? Agency and Capabilities in the Reconciliation of Employment and Family. Marriage and Family Review,39(3/4),197-227.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKohler, H.-P., Billari, F. C.&Ortega, J. A. (2002) .The Emergence of Lowest-Low Fertility in Europe During the 1990s. Population and development review, 28(4),641-680.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLeibenstein,H.(1957). Economic Backwardness and Economic Growth. Wiley,New York,John Wiley and Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLutz, W. and Skirbekk.V. (2005). Policies addressing the tempo effect in low fertility countries, Population and Development Review 31(4): 699-720.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcDonald,P.(2000).Gender Equity, Social Institutions and the Future of Fertility. Journal of Population Research ,17(1),1-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcDonald,P.(2006). Low Fertility and the State: The Efficacy of Policy. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 485–510.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcDonald,P. (2007).Time for action: Public policies to revert low fertility. Pharmaceuticals Policy and Law,9,237-243.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMiettinen,A.,Basten,S.,Rotkirch,A.(2011).Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited:Evidence from Finland.Demographic Research,24(20),469-496.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNotestein, Frank W.(1945).Population-The Long View.Pp.36-57 in Theodore W. Schulty (ed.). Food for the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceQu,L., Weston,R.,Kilmartin,C.(2000).Effects of changing personal relationship on decisions about having children. Family Matters,57,14-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTesta,M.R.,Grilli.L.,(2006).The Influence of Childbearing Regional Contexts on Ideal Family Size in Europe.Population-E,61(1-2),99-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThomson.E.(1997).Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography,34(3),343-354.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSkirbekk,V.(2008). Fertility trends by social status. Demographic Research, 18(5),145-180.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSen, A. (2003). Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.) The qualityof life (pp. 30-53). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVitali,A.,Billari,F.C.,Prskawetz,A.,Testa,M.R.(2009).Preference Theory and Low Fertility: A Comparative Perspective. European Demographic Research Papers,25,413-438.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYi,Chin-Chun (1978)。Sex Role Attitudes and Ideal Family Size: A Study Of Residents Of Minneapolis, Minnesota。台大社會學刊,15,172-195。zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
011101.pdf1.05 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.