Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55069
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor王智賢zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWang, Jue Shyanen_US
dc.contributor.author廖晏君zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLiao, Yen Chunen_US
dc.creator廖晏君zh_TW
dc.creatorLiao, Yen Chunen_US
dc.date2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T07:25:18Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-30T07:25:18Z-
dc.date.issued2012-10-30T07:25:18Z-
dc.identifierG0098255004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55069-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description財政研究所zh_TW
dc.description98255004zh_TW
dc.description100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract在國際貿易日趨活絡的情況下,智慧財產權受侵害之問題,已成為持續關注的問題。本文探討當智慧財產權等無形資產為外國正版商所擁有時,外國政府透過關稅連結下,本國政府將如何制定國內的仿冒查緝率。透過本研究我們發現當外國市場規模較小時,本國政府會將仿冒查緝率定為零;當外國市場規模夠大時,本國政府會將仿冒查緝率定為查緝率上限;而當外國市場規模介於前兩種情形之間時,仿冒查緝率有可能為零或查緝率上限。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBecause of intense international trade, infringement of intellectual property has caught the persistent attentions. This paper analyzes how domestic government decides the optimal enforcement rate through tariff link when the intellectual property is held by a foreign company. We find the domestic government would set the enforcement rate to zero when the foreign market size is small. On the contrary, when the foreign market size is large, the domestic government would raise the enforcement rate to the upper limit. Besides, when the foreign market size is moderate, the enforcement rate would be zero or at the upper limit.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第1章 前言 1\n第2章 基本模型 6\n第3章 本國政府最適查緝率之決策 11\n第4章 外國政府最適關稅之決定 17\n第5章 結論 22\n參考文獻 23zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098255004en_US
dc.subject智慧財產權zh_TW
dc.subject關稅zh_TW
dc.subjectIntellectual Propertyen_US
dc.subjectTariffen_US
dc.title仿冒查緝與外國市場之關稅連結zh_TW
dc.titleThe tariff link between enforcement rate and foreign market sizeen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference中文部分\n王智賢、陳盈竹 (2009),「最適仿冒品查緝率的制定」,財稅研究,第 41 卷 4 期,38-63。\n王智賢、楊敦雅 (2008),「仿冒查緝與政治獻金」,經濟研究,第 44 卷 1 期,107-138。\n吳芝文、周建富 (2004),「智慧財產權與經濟效率」,經濟論文,第 32 卷 2 期,335-361。\n周登陽、楊維娟、黃美卿 (2006),「保護智慧財產權之經濟分析—從南方的需求面探討之」,經濟研究,第 42 卷 2 期,183-207。\n蔡明芳、邱俊榮 (2006),「仿冒與政府政策」,未發表論文。\n蔡明芳、邱俊榮 (2008),「本國市場存在仿冒下的進口關稅」,經濟論文叢刊,第 36 輯 2 期,271-292。\n英文部分\nAn, G. and K. E. Maskus (2009), “The Impacts of Alignment with Global Product Standards on Exports of Firms in Developing Countries,” World Economy, 32, 552-574.\nBanerjee, D. S. (2003), “Software Piracy: A Strategic Analysis and Policy Instruments,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 97-127.\nBesen, S. M. and S. N. Kirby (1989), “Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties,” Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 255-280.\nConner, K. and R. P. Rumelt (1991), “Software Piracy : An Analysis of Protection Strategies,” Management Science, 37, 125-139.\nCopeland, B. R (1990), “Strategic Interaction among Nations: Negotiable and Non-negotiable Trade Barriers,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 23, 84-108.\nFreedman, D. H. (1999), “Fakers Paradise,” Forbes, 5, Special Supplement, 48-55.\nGallini, N. (1992), “Patent Policy and Costly Imitation,” Rand Journal Economics, 23, 52-63.\nGlass, A. J. and K. Saggi. (2002), “Intellectual Property Right and Foreign Direct Investment,” Journal of International Economics, 56, 387-410.\nGrossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1994), “Protection for Sale,” American Economic Review, 84, 833-850.\nGrossman, G. M. and E. L-C. Lai (2004), “International Protection of Intellectual Property,” American Economic Review, 96, 1635-1653.\nGrossman, G. M. and C. Shapiro (1988a), “Foreign Counterfeiting of Status Goods,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 79-100.\n_______ (1988b), “Counterfeit-Product Trade,” American Economic Review, 78, 59-75.\n\nHelpman, E. (1993), “Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Right,” Econometrica, 61, 1247-1280.\nHiggins, R. S. and P. H. Rubin (1986), “Counterfeit Goods,” Journal of Law and Economics, 29, 211-230.\nKang, M. (2006), “Trade policy mix : IPR protection and R&D subsidies,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 39, 744-757.\nKrakowski, M. (2008), “The Relations between the European Union and Latin America and the Caribbean: Current State and Perspectives,” Intereconomics/Review of European Economic Policy, 43, 112-120.\nKrugman, P. R. (1979), “A model of Innovation Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income,” Journal of Political Economy, 87, 253-266.\nNascimento, F. and W. R. Vanhonacker (1988), “Optimal Strategic Pricing of Reproducible Consumer Products” Management Science, 34, 921-935.\nNoble, G. W., J. Ravenhill and R. F. Doner (2005), “Executioner or Disciplinarian: WTO Accession and the Chinese Auto Industry,” Business and Politics, 7, 1-33.\nNovos, I. E and M. Waldman (1984), “The Effects of Increased Copyright Protection: An Analytic Approach,” Journal of Political Economy, 92, 236-246.\nRutstrom, E. E. (1995), “Political Preference Functions, Trade Wars, and Trade Negotiations,” Empirical Economics, 20, 49-73.\nShy, O. and J. F. Thisse (1999), “A Strategic Approach to Software Protection,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 8, 163-190.\nTakalo, T. and V. Kanniainen (2000), “Do Patent Slow Down Techonological Progress? Real Options in Research, Patenting, and Market Introduction,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 1105-1127.\nTakeyama, L. N. (1994), “The Welfare Implications of Unauthorized Reproduction of Intellectual Property in the Presence of Demand Network Externalities,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 42, 155-166.zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
500401.pdf2.43 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.