Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55164| 題名: | 國民中小學校長領導能力指標權重之建構：以美國ISLLC學校領導者標準為例 The construction of weight system of principal’s leadership competence indicators for the elementary and junior high school: The case of ISLLC Standards for School Leaders in American |
作者: | 陳遵行 Chen, Zun Shing |
貢獻者: | 秦夢群 陳遵行 Chen, Zun Shing |
關鍵詞: | 校長領導能力 校長培育課程 分析網路程序法 principal leadership capacity principal preparation program analytic network process |
日期: | 2012 | 上傳時間: | 1-Nov-2012 | 摘要: | 本研究旨在參照美國跨州學校領導標準證照聯合會（ISLLC）所提出的「ISLLC學校領導者標準」為例，藉以建構出國民中小學校長領導能力指標權重體系。研究方法運用分析網路程序法（ANP），研究工具則採用編修之「國民中小學校長領導能力指標權重體系調查問卷」，並以校長學、校長培育、學校行政等領域之13位學者專家為研究對象，對國民中小學校長領導能力指標之內容進行重要性評比。\n本研究依據研究結果，得到以下二項研究結論：\n一、學校文化與教學方案為最重要之校長領導能力向度\n二、提升教師專業能力為最重要之校長領導能力指標\n\n而依據研究結論，本研究提出以下建議，以作為教育行政機關、校長培育機構等之參考。\n一、對教育行政機關之建議\n（一）儘速研擬設立校長培育標準及專責單位\n（二）校長領導能力指標可作為校長評鑑與校長證照制度之基礎\n\n二、對校長培育機構之建議\n（一）校長培育課程中其校長領導能力的規劃，以「學校文化的建立」與「教師能力的提升」作為初階能力的養成\n（二）「提升教師專業能力」、「合作發展與共享」、「發展績效評估系統」作為校長培育課程的首要目標\n\n此外，本研究亦針對後續研究者在研究對象、研究方法及研究範圍等三方面，提出相關建議。\n\n關鍵字：校長領導能力、校長培育課程、分析網路程序法 The purpose of this study is to construct a weight system of principal’s leadership competence indicators for the elementary and junior high school, and this study refer to “Interstate school leaders licensure consortium: Standards for school leaders” as an example. The main method of this study is Analytic Network Process (ANP). The research instrument of this study is a modified questionnaire which is used to survey the elementary and junior high principal’s leadership competence. 13 scholar experts most in principalship, principal preparation and school administration are taken as the research object to estimate the importance of indicator for the elementary and junior high school principal’s leadership competence.\n\nAccording to the research results, two conclusions are as follows:\n\n1. School culture and instructional program is the most important dimension of school principals` leadership competence.\n\n2. Enhancement of the professional competence of teachers is the most important indicator of school principals` leadership competence.\n\nThis study provides the following suggestions from the conclusions to the educational administrations and the organizations of principal preparation for reference:\n\n1. For education administration authority\n(1) Plan to establish the standards of principal preparation and set up an unit in charge of them.\n(2) The indicator of school principals` leadership competence can be a basis of principal evaluation and principals’ licensure.\n\n2. For the institutes of principal preparation\n(1) Planning of principals` leadership capacity in the principal preparation courses as entry-level capacities are “The establishment of school culture” and “The enhancement of the professional competence of teachers”.\n(2) The principal of the primary objective of the course are “The enhancement of the professional competence of teachers”, “The cooperation and development and sharing”, and “The development of performance evaluation system”.\n\nIn addition, this study also provides future researchers in three areas of the object of study, research methods and scope of the study to make recommendations.\n\nKeywords: principal leadership capacity, principal preparation program, analytic network process |
參考文獻: | 一、中文部分\n王文科（1994）。課程與教學論。臺北市：五南。\n王文科（2007）。課程與教學論（第七版）。臺北市：五南。\n王玉麟（1998）。美國中小學校長培育制度在我國實施之可行性研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。\n王保進（2002）。「建立國民中小學校長、主任及學校行政人員之甄選、儲訓、培育、任用體系及專業證照制度之研究」專案研究報告。臺北：臺北市立師範學院。\n吳清山(1999)。台北市國民中小學校長遴選方案探討。台北：台北市政府教育局。\n巫孟蓁（2007）。英國國立學校領導學院（NCSL）對我國中小學校長培育機構之啟示。學校行政雙月刊，47，266-285。\n李子健、黃顯華（1996）。課程：範式、取向和設計。臺北市：五南。\n李安明（2002）。發展學校本位的校長培育方案以因應校長領導新趨勢。載於國立臺北師範學院舉辦之「中小學校長培育證照甄選評鑑與專業發展」國際學術研討會論文集（頁131-146），國立臺北師範學院中小學校長培育與專業發展中心。\n李俊湖（2002）。小學校長儲訓制度檢討與建議。論文發表於淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所舉辦之「地方教育行政論壇~中小學校長儲訓、證照、遴選、評鑑制度」研討會，臺北市。2012年3月14日，取自http://www.docin.com/p-109973749.html\n李冠嫺（2007）。國民小學校長培育課程與校長績效管理能力之研究。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。\n沈進發（2000）。臺北縣國民小學初任校長工作內涵、入職狀況及其相關因素之探討。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。\n周幸吟（2001）。中英中小學校長培訓與任用制度之比較研究。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。\n林文律（1999a）。從校長必備能力看校長培育。現代教育論壇，5，168-178。\n林文律（1999b）。校長職務與校長職前教育、導入階段與在職進修。現代教育論壇，5，304-317。 \n林文律（2000）。美國校長證照制度。國立臺北師範學院學報，13，65-90。台北：國立臺北師範學院。\n林文律（2001）。剖析校長證照制度—專訪國北師院林文律主任。教育研究月刊，90，10-15。\n林文律（2005）。校長的專業發展取向。載於國立教育研究院籌備處（主編），校長的專業發展（頁53-78）。臺北：國立教育研究院籌備處。\n林文律、陳木金（2000）。臺北市國民小學候用校長甄選方式之研究。臺北市政府教育局委託專案研究報告。臺北市：國立臺北教育大學。\n林志成（2005）。從行動智慧概念看校長專業發展。教育研究月刊，129，5-14。\n林明地、詹盛如、李麗玲（2010）。國民中小學校長、主任專業發展課程內涵研究（編號NAER-98-12-E-2-04-00-2-02）。台北：國立教育研究院籌備處。\n林海清（2000）。從校長培育與專業發展看校長證照制度。教育資料與研究， 37，21-25。\n施宏彥（2001）。國民小學校長培育模式之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。\n施良方（1997）。課程理論。高雄市：麗文文化。\n洪梅炤（2002）。海峽兩岸義務教育階段中小學校長培育制度比較研究。國立暨南國際大學比較教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，南投。\n秦夢群（2000）。教育行政—實務部分。臺北市：五南。\n秦夢群（2007）。校長培育制度之趨勢分析：以英、美及新加坡為例。學校行政雙月刊，51，1-18。\n國立教育研究院籌備處（2006）。國民小學校長主任培訓制度模式之研究。台北：國立教育研究院籌備處。\n張明輝（2004）。從後現代觀點看學校校長的關鍵能力。現代教育論壇，13，532-540。\n陳木金（2002）。學校領導研究─從混沌理論研究彩繪學校經營的天空。臺北：高等教育研究。\n陳木金（2005）。混沌系統動力學對中小學校長培育課程的啟示。載於臺北市立教育大學舉辦之「海峽兩岸中小學校長培育與校務評鑑」學術研討會會議手冊（頁37- 58），臺北市。\n陳宏彰（2005）。英國校長專業資格檢定制度（NPQH）在我國國中小學校長培育制度建構之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。\n陳順利（2006）。國中小校長甄選培育發展機制之芻議－人力資源管理和策略聯盟的觀點。學校行政雙月刊，46，17-29。\n黃光雄、楊龍立（2000）。課程設計：理論與實作。臺北市：師大書苑。\n黃光雄、蔡清田（1999）。課程設計：理論與實際。臺北市：五南。\n黃政傑（1991）。課程設計。臺北市：東華書局。\n楊振昇（1999）。我國國民小學校長儲訓制度之困境及其因應策略。初等教育學刊，7，85-106。\n葉信一（2005）。國民小學校長職前儲訓之研究－以嘉義縣為例。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺南市。\n鄧振源（2005）。計畫評估－方法與應用（第二版）。海洋大學運籌規劃與管理研究中心，台北市：鼎茂。\n鄭崇趁（2004）。校長核心能力的成因與內涵分析。現代教育論壇-從後現代看校長的核心能力的轉變，21-36。台北：國立教育資料館。 \n魏惠娟（2003）。校長的學校經營之事分析與培訓主題之研究：學習型學校的觀點。成人及終身教育學刊，1，131-163。\n\n二、英文部分\nAnn Lauder. (2000). The new look in principal preparation programs. Special section professional development I: principal. Retrieved December 02, 2011, from http://bul.sagepub.com/content/84/617/23\nCapasso, R. L., & Daresh, J. C. (2001). The school administration handbook: Leading, mentoring, and participating in the internship program. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.\nColeman, D., Copeland, D., & Adams, R. C. (2001). University education administration program development: Administrative skills vs. achievement standards as predictors of administrative success. In T. J. Kowalski & G. Perreault (Eds.), 21st century challenges for school administrators, 53-61. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.\nCouncil of Chief State School Officers (2008). Educational leadership policy standards: ISLLC 2008. Retrieved December 02, 2011, from http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2008/Educational_Leadership_Policy_Standards_2008.pdf\nCouncil of Chief State School Officers. (1996). Interstate school leaders licensure consortium: Standards for school leaders. Washington, DC: Author.\nCrow, G. M., & Glascock, C. (1995). Socialization to a new conception of the principalship. Journal of Educational Administration, 33(1), 22-43.\nDahle, C. (2004). Social capitalists: The top 20 groups that are changing the world. Fast Company, 78, 45-50.\nDavis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). School leadership study: Preparing successful principals.\nDepartment for education and skills. (2004). National standards for headteachers. Retrieved December 02, 2011, from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/NS4HFinalpdf.pdf\nDoud, J. L., & Keller, E. P. (1998). A ten-year study: The K-8 principal in 1998. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Elementary School Principals.\nEduQnA.com. (2007). What is the meaning of curriculum? and what are the examples of curriculum? Retrieved November 27, 2011, from http://www.eduqna.com/Other/175-other.html\nGranott, N. (1998). We learn, therefore we develop: Learning versus development—or developing learning? In M.C. Smith, & Thomas Pouchot (Eds.), Adult learning and development: Perspectives from educational psychology, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\nHess, F. M. (2005). An Innovative Look, a Recalcitrant Reality: The Politics of Principal Preparation Reform. Educational Policy, 19(1), 155-180. doi: 10.1177/0895904804270776\nHoyle, J. R., English, F. W., & Steffy, B. E. (1998). Skills for successful 21st century school leaders: Standards for peak performers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.\nJackson, B. L., & Kelley, C. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 192-212.\nKelley, C., & Peterson, K. (2000, November). The work of principals and their preparation: Addressing critical needs for the 21st century. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, NM:Albuquerque.\nKIPP Foundation. (n.d.). Principal Prep. Retrieved November 27, 2011 form http://www.kipp.org/school-leaders/leadership-programs/principal-prep\nKnapp, M. S., Copland, M. A., Talbert, J. E. (2003, February). Leading for learning: Reflective tools for school and district leaders. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.\nLane, J. J. (Ed.). (1984). The making of a principal. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.\nLaura M. Meade, Adrien R. Presley. (2002). R&D project selection using the analytic network process. Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 59-66.\nLave, J. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. NY: Cambridge University Press.\nLave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. NY: Cambridge University Press.\nMahaffey, T.L. Kaplan, t., & Triolo, P.K. (1998). A nursing fellowship: Building leadership skills. Nursing management, 29(3), 30-32.\nMilstein, M. M., & Krueger, J. A. (1997). Improving educational administration preparation programs: What we have learned over the past decade. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(2), 100-106.\nMilstein, M. M., Bobroff, B. M., & Restine, L. N. (1991). Internship programs in educational administration: A guide to preparing educational leaders. NY: Teachers College Press.\nMurphy, J. (2006). Charting the Changing Landscape of the Preparation of School Leaders: An Agenda for Research and Action.\nMurphy, J. (Ed.). (1993). Preparing tomorrow’s school leaders: Alternative designs. University Park, PA: University Council for Educational Administration.\nMurphy, J., & Forsyth, P. B. (Eds.). (1999). Educational administration: A decade of reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.\nNational Policy Board for Educational Administration. (1998). NCATE curriculum guidelines: Advanced programs in educational leadership for principals, superintendents, curriculum directors, and supervisors. In National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (Ed.), NCATE curriculum guidelines, 183-204. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.\nNational Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2002). Standards for advanced programs in educational leadership for principals, superintendents, curriculum directors, and supervisors. Retrieved November 27, 2011, from http://www.npbea.org/ELCC/ELCCStandards%20_5-02.pdf\nNewLeaders. (n.d.). Emerging Leaders Program. Retrieved November 27, 2011 from http://www.newleaders.org/what-we-do/emerging-leaders-program/\nNortheast Texas Consortium. (2002). Distance Learning College Glossary. Retrieved November 27, 2011, from http://www.netnet.org/students/student%20glossary.htm\nOrtiz, F. I. (1982). Career patterns in education: Women, men and minorities in public school administration. NY: Praeger.\nParente, F., & Anderson-Parente, J. (1987). Delphi inquiry systems. In Wright, G., & Ayton, P., (Eds.), Judgmental Forecasting, 129-156, NY:John Wiley & Sons.\nPeter K., & Charles F. W. (2008). Programs for school principal preparation in East Europe. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(6), 739-751.\nPeterson, K. (2002). The professional development of principals: Innovations and opportunities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 213-232.\nSaaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2006). Decision making with the analytic network process. NY:Springer.\nSaaty, T.L. (1996). The analytic network process. RWS Publications, Expert Choice, Inc.,:Pittsburgh.\nSaaty, T.L., and Takizawa M. (1986). Dependence and independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 26(2), 229-237.\nSaylor, T. G., Alexander, W. M., & Lewis, A. J. (1981). Curriculum planning for better teaching and learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston.\nSchön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.\nSchool leadership program. (2002). Awards: School leadership 2002 grant abstracts. Retrieved November 27, 2011, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/leadership/2002abstracts.html\nStein, D. (1998). Situated learning in adult education. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. (ERIC Digest No. 195)\nTucker, M. S., & Codding, J. B. (Eds.). (2002). The principal challenge: Leading and managing schools in an era of accountability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\nUsdan, M. D. (2002). Reactions to articles commissioned by the National Commission for theAdvancement of Education Leadership Preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 300-307.\nValentine, J. (2001). Goals 2000 principal leadership development project: Final report. Final report of Goals 2000 grant, Columbia, MO.\nVan Meter, E., & Murphy, J. (1997). Using ISLLC standards to strengthen preparation programs in school administration. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.\nWhite, E., & Crow, G. M. (1993, April). Rites of passage: The role perceptions of interns in the preparation for principalship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.\nWojtczak, A. (2002). Glossary of Medical Education Terms. Retrieved November 27, 2011, from http://www.iime.org/glossary.htm | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 教育行政與政策研究所 98171011 101 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098171011 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101101.pdf | 966 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.