Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67176| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王智賢 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 詹書寧 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chan, Shu Ning | en_US |
| dc.creator | 詹書寧 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Chan, Shu Ning | en_US |
| dc.date | 2013 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-01T04:19:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-07-01T04:19:25Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-07-01T04:19:25Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0101255007 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67176 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 財政研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 101255007 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 102 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來客製化需求日漸遽增，產生多樣化和客製化的產品及服務，使得議題因應而生。本文建立模型討論一家擁有客製化產品能力的廠商，與另一家沒有客製化產品能力但可以進行廣告投入或藉由市場定位來調整產品特性的廠商，進行市場競爭情況。最後研究發現：當擁有客製化能力的廠商選擇將產品客製化時，將使得以市場定位方式競爭的其他廠商，選擇產品定位使自己更加專業化；具客製化能力的廠商將具有對其他廠商產生利潤降低的潛在影響；以及當其他廠商不同的市場定位的成本係數與廣告投入成本係數的相對大小，如何影響兩家廠商的策略性選擇的情況。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The needs of customization are increasing gradually. It leads to various and customized products and service. The issue “Mass Customization” also comes out for discussion. We use a game-theoretical model to discuss the competition between the firms with and without customization capability. We assume that the firm without customization capability can adjust the product characteristics by inputting advertising or selecting market location. We find out that when the firm with customization capability chooses to customize products, the other firm that selects the market location as competition strategy would make itself more professional. Moreover, the firm with customization capability has the potential effect on decreasing other firms’ profit. We also discuss how the relative size between the cost coefficient of market location and the cost coefficient of advertising input would affect the strategic choice of the two firms. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 1.Introduction 4\n\n2.The Model 6\n 2.1 Situation 1: Firm chooses not to customize products, firm chooses to adjust market location to compete with. 7\n 2.2 Situation 2: Firm chooses not to customize products, firm chooses to advertise its products to compete with. 8\n 2.3 Situation 3: Firm chooses to customize products, firm chooses to adjust market location to compete with. 9\n 2.4 Situation 4: Firm chooses to customize products, firm chooses to advertise its products to compete with. 10\n\n3.Equilibrium: the second and the third stage. 12\n 3.1 Situation 1 12\n 3.2 Situation 2 13\n 3.3 Situation 3 14\n 3.4 Situation 4 16\n\n4.Equilibrium: the first stage. 18\n【Proposition 1】 20\n【Proposition 2】 20\n【Proposition 3】 23\n【Corollary 1】 25\n\n5.Conclusion 26\n\nReferences 28 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 304337 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101255007 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 客製化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 廣告 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 市場定位 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Hotelling | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 子賽局完全均衡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Customization | en_US |
| dc.subject | Advertising | en_US |
| dc.subject | Market Location | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hotelling | en_US |
| dc.subject | Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium | en_US |
| dc.title | 客製化能力廠商的策略性選擇 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Strategic Choice of the Firm with Customization Capability | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference | 1. Bloch, F. and D. Manceau, (1999), “Persuasive Advertising in Hotelling`s Model of Product Differentiation,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17:4, 557-574.\n2. Cengiz, E., H. Ayyildiz, and B. Er, (2007), “Effects of Image and Advertising Efficiency on Customer Loyalty and Antecedents of Loyalty: Turkish Banks Sample,” Banks and Bank Systems, 2:1, 56-78.\n3. Chung, C. W., H. T. Chen, and C. Y. Lin, (2012), “A Study of Brand Perception, Advertising Effectiveness and Relationship Quality on Purchase Intention,” Journal of Data Analysis, 7:5, 137-157.\n4. d’Aspremont, C., J. Gabszewicz, and J. -F. Thisse, (1979), “On Hotelling’s Stability in Competition,” Econometrica, 47:5, 1145-1151.\n5. Irmen, A. and J.-F. Thisse, (1996), “Competition in Multi-characteristics Spaces: Hotelling was Almost Right,” C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers: 1446.\n6. Loginova, O. (2010), “Brand Familiarity and Product Knowledge in Customization,” International Journal of Economic Theory, 6:3, 297-309.\n7. Loginova, O. (2012), “Competitive Effects of Mass Customization,” Review of Marketing Science, 10:1, 1-32.\n8. Johnson, J. P. (2013), “Targeted Advertising and Advertising Avoidance,” RAND Journal of Economics, 44:1, 128-44.\n9. Syam, N. B., R. Ranran, and D. H. James, (2005), “Customized Products: A Competitive Analysis,” Marketing Science, 24:4, 569-84.\n10. Xia, N. and S. Rajagopalan, (2009), “Standard vs. Custom Products: Variety, Lead Time, and Price Competition,” Marketing Science, 28:5, 887-900. | zh_TW |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.languageiso639-1 | en_US | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500701.pdf | 297.2 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.