Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69487
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor姜家雄zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChiang, Chia Hsiungen_US
dc.contributor.author盧俊明zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLu, Chun Mingen_US
dc.creator盧俊明zh_TW
dc.creatorLu, Chun Mingen_US
dc.date2013en_US
dc.identifierG0101922024en_US
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description101922024zh_TW
dc.description102zh_TW
dc.description.abstract南海爭端近幾年區域緊張情勢不斷升高。中國已將南海列為「核心利益」,而美國則將南海視為「國家利益」。基此,這顯現中美兩國在南海議題的積極作為,雙方在其處理南海議題的戰略架構下,兩國主要舉措均在外交與軍事層面上針鋒相對。外交上中國以「睦鄰外交」,穩定周邊局勢,美國則運用「前沿部署外交」拉攏東亞各國;兩國對於東協國家的態度將更為重視,亦是雙方外交戰略的重點所在,渠等均希望藉由東協國家的支持在南海議題上更有話語權。而軍事上中國以「反介入/區域拒止」的軍事作為防止域外國家介入其主權議題,而美國研擬「空海一體戰」除運用其強大的軍事科技實力外,欲結合各盟邦的力量,與其一同牽制中國的軍事行動。\n 綜上,在中美兩國相互的競逐作為下,佐以米爾斯海默之攻勢現實主義觀點,檢視中美兩國在南海之未來互動關係。潛在霸權國中國擁有眾多的人口與快速成長的經濟,並在南海整軍經武,試圖強化與東協甚或是東亞諸國的經貿互賴程度,且於處理亞洲事務中將美國排除在外,以取代美國擔任亞洲關鍵角色,尤其在南海的不妥協性,顯現出中國在此區域的主導性。另外,既存霸權國美國面對中國綜合國力崛起,則扮演「離岸平衡者」,融合「推諉卸責」、「均勢」之概念,拉攏東協及日本、印度等相關國家,共同制衡南海區域的權力失衡狀態,鞏固霸權地位。中美雙方皆將南海問題的層級提高,並且均欲爭取南海區域之領導地位,因此兩國在此區域未來將趨於競爭關係。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe tension caused by the South China Sea dispute has been rising in recent years. China has listed the South China Sea as her “core interest”, while the U.S. considers the South China Sea as “national interest”. This, shows that both China and the U.S. have been acting aggressively on the South China Sea issue. Both sides, under their own strategic frames in dealing with the issues, square off over each other’s diplomatic and military acts. Diplomatically, China practices “Good Neighboring Diplomacy” to stabilize the relations with her surrounding neighbors, while the U.S. applies “Forward-Deployed Diplomacy” to bring together each country in East Asia to fight against China. The two countries value the attitude of the ASEAN members more than ever, and this is also the main focus of their diplomatic strategies; both desire to have more say on the South China Sea issue by gaining support from members of the ASEAN. In terms of military operation, China practices “Anti-Access/Area-Denial” to prevent other countries from intervening her sovereignty issues, while the U.S. crafts “Air-Sea Battle”, in which the U.S. applies her devastating military and technology power, and combines the force of each ally to rein China’s military operation. \nAll in all, with the China-U.S. competition as the backdrop, and by referring to John Mearsheimer’s offensive realism, this study examines the future Sino-American relations in the South China Sea. China, as a potential hegemon, possesses a large population and a fast-growing economy; the state also conducts military operations in the South China Sea, with a view to consolidating the mutual economic and trade dependence of China and the ASEAN, even countries in East Asia. Moreover, China excludes the U.S. from dealing with tasks in Asia for the purpose of replacing the U.S. as the Asia’s key player. China’s intransigency in the South China Sea particularly reveals her dominance in the region. Besides, in facing China’s rise in all aspects, the U.S., as the current hegemon, plays the role of “The Off-shore Balancer”. By mixing "Buck-Passing" with "Balancing", the U.S. brings together countries involved in the issue such as the members of ASEAN, Japan, and India to collectively rein the power imbalance in the South China Sea, so as to consolidate her dominance. Both China and the U.S. have raised the level of the South China Sea issue, and have scrambled to gain the dominance in the South China Sea. Therefore, in the future, the two countries will become more of two competitors in this region.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第壹章 緒論 1\n 第一節 研究動機與目的 1\n 第二節 文獻評論 5\n 第三節 研究途徑與方法 12\n 第四節 研究範圍與限制 13\n 第五節 章節安排 14\n第貳章 南海爭端緣起與發展 16\n 第一節 南海地緣價值 16\n 第二節 南海爭端之發展 24\n 第三節 域外國家與南海爭端 35\n 第四節 南海議題對區域之影響 47\n第參章 中美兩國之南海政策與戰略佈局 54\n 第一節 中國南海政策之演進 54\n 第二節 中國南海戰略佈局 66\n 第三節 美國戰略東移之背景 76\n 第四節 美國南海戰略佈局 90\n第肆章 南海爭端之中美兩國關係 105\n 第一節 南海爭端之中美兩國競逐作為 105\n 第二節 區域國家影響中美兩國在南海競逐之因素 116\n 第三節 攻勢現實主義與南海議題 129\n 第四節 從攻勢現實主義探討南海之中美兩國關係 142\n第伍章 結論 161\n 第一節 研究發現 161\n 第二節 後續研究建議 165\n參考書目 167zh_TW
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101922024en_US
dc.subject南海爭端zh_TW
dc.subject核心利益zh_TW
dc.subject重返亞洲zh_TW
dc.subject霸權zh_TW
dc.subject攻勢現實主義zh_TW
dc.subjectthe South China Sea issueen_US
dc.subjectcore interesten_US
dc.subjectreturn to Asiaen_US
dc.subjecthegemonen_US
dc.subjectoffensive realismen_US
dc.title從南海議題探討中美兩國之競逐關係zh_TW
dc.titleChina-U.S. Relations from the South China Sea Issueen_US
dc.typethesisen
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
202401.pdf3.44 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.