Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/75537
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor財政系-
dc.creatorLai, C.-Y.I.;Yang, Chuncai-
dc.date2014-04-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-02T09:26:46Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-02T09:26:46Z-
dc.date.issued2015-06-02T09:26:46Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/75537-
dc.description.abstractThe environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) could arise from the scale effect in abatement technology as emphasized by Andreoni and Levinson (2001) or from the induced policy response as suggested by Grossman and Krueger (1995). This paper incorporates these two contrary views into a model and quantitatively evaluates their relative importance in shaping the EKC of U.S. water pollution. Our main findings include: (a) some scale effect in abatement technology must exist, otherwise the turning point of the EKC will be unreasonably high; (b) the scale effect alone is not sufficient to explain the practical occurrence of the turning point of the EKC; and (c) the scale effect features critically in the induced policy response as well. (JEL H41, O40, Q20) © 2013 Western Economic Association International.-
dc.format.extent627502 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.relationContemporary Economic Policy, 32(2), 435-450-
dc.titleScale effect versus induced policy response in the environmental kuznets curve: The case of U.S. water pollution-
dc.typearticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/coep.12014-
dc.doi.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/coep.12014-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
435-450.pdf612.79 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.