Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78217
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor風管系
dc.creatorHuang, Yi-Chieh;Tzeng, Larry Y.;Zhao, Lin
dc.creator曾郁仁zh_TW
dc.date2015-05
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-02T09:40:37Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-02T09:40:37Z-
dc.date.issued2015-09-02T09:40:37Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78217-
dc.description.abstractThis paper first defines an increase in ambiguity and an increase in downside ambiguity. We then provide comparative criteria for ambiguity aversion and downside ambiguity aversion. Different from the finding that the comparative criterion for risk aversion is variant with the measure of the premium to reduce risks, we show that the criteria remain the same, whether the premiums to reduce ambiguity and downside ambiguity are measured by utility or money. Under the criteria, a more ambiguity-averse (downside-ambiguity-averse) individual is shown to spend more effort in reducing ambiguity (downside ambiguity) than a less ambiguity-averse (downside-ambiguity-averse) individual.
dc.format.extent529182 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.relationInsurance: Mathematics & Economics, 62, 257-269
dc.subjectAmbiguity;Comparative ambiguity aversion;Comparative downside ambiguity aversion;D80;D81;Downside ambiguity;Effort
dc.titleComparative ambiguity aversion and downside ambiguity aversion
dc.typearticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.insmatheco.2015.04.002
dc.doi.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2015.04.002
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
257-269.pdf516.78 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.