Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94892| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉梅君 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 周佳穎 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | 周佳穎 | zh_TW |
| dc.date | 2009 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-09T04:36:11Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-05-09T04:36:11Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-05-09T04:36:11Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0094262025 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94892 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 勞工研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 94262025 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 庇護性就業作為身心障礙者就業的多元選擇之一，這項就業服務在歐美國家施行了一世紀已久，目前尤其以心智障礙者為此服務的主要使用者，各國文獻均對於推動庇護性就業的利弊有所探討，但究竟應淘汰或保留庇護性就業措施，至今仍未有一致共識，而基於不同的原則精神與哲學觀點，歐洲與美國在庇護性就業服務上也發展出相異的經驗軌跡。我國對於庇護性就業服務的概念，早期多停留在社福組織與身障者之間的服務關係，在身心障礙者權益保障法通過之後，才確立將庇護工場定位為一般營業場所，也是身心障礙者的正式就業場所，存有勞資關係。同時，職業輔導評量服務也成為身心障礙者是否能擁有庇護性就業員工資格以進入庇護工場的重要機制，代表在身權法通過以後，職業輔導評量在庇護性就業職場的運用上，也有相當程度的責任加重。\r\n 有鑒庇護性就業及其相關服務在我國正處於發展變動之際，本研究期待以歐美國家的發展經驗作為我國參考，並針對庇護性就業及其相關服務運作中的重要代表：雇主(庇護工場代表)、職業輔導評量人員(職評服務代表)以及主管機關(地方勞政代表)進行深入訪談研究，以三者觀點瞭解現階段我國庇護性就業及其相關服務現況、問題，以及未來挑戰。\r\n 身心障礙者權益保障法的通過對於庇護工場、職業輔導評量與地方勞政主管機關三方面都造成相當影響，研究發現如下：\r\n1.庇護工場方面：(一)由民間機構辦理庇護工場立案的阻礙與困難，使服務單位在申辦過程中遭受不少挫折。(二)生產與營利導向衝擊服務使命，更鮮明地強化了勞方與資方的對立關係。(三)對庇護性就業者的就業能力篩選，使庇護工場逐漸傾向提高服務對象的職能要求。\r\n2.職業輔導評量方面：(一)職業輔導評量成為進/出庇護性就業職場的重要服務機制，若身心障礙者若就業能力上已不適任原職場，經職評結果認定後，職場可免除其資遣義務。(二)職業輔導評量與庇護性就業職場的互信關係仍需加強。職評人員有時會遭受庇護性就業服務方的質疑，原因多半出在不信任職評服務的專業判斷，也認為職評報告可受人為影響刻意操控。\r\n3.地方主管機關方面：(一)身權法的施行也讓地方勞政機機主動投入更多公共資源設立庇護性就業職場，並更積極研擬未來的相關配套措施。(二)另一方面，也加強了對庇護性就業職場在管理經營技能與資源的導入。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第壹章 緒論 \r\n第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………………….………..…….1\r\n第二節 研究目的………………………………………………………….………..…….4\r\n第三節 研究設計………………………………………………………….………..…….5\r\n第貳章 文獻探討 \r\n第一節 名詞定義…………………………………………………………….………...….8\r\n第二節 身心障礙者就業政策與立法…………………………………….……….…….11\r\n第三節 庇護性就業模式之分類與論述……………………………………..………….20\r\n第四節 歐美國家庇護性就業模式發展之經驗…………………………….…….…….29\r\n第五節 我國庇護性就業模式的發展歷程與概况………………………….…….…….39\r\n第參章 現行庇護性就業職場的運作狀況 \r\n第一節 庇護工場在新舊法過渡期間的歷程與影響……………………….…….….…48\r\n第二節 職業輔導評量在庇護性就業服務機制中的應用……………….…….….……58\r\n第三節 地方勞政辦理庇護性就業服務的業務情形…………………….………..……70\r\n第肆章 庇護性就業職場的挑戰與省思 \r\n第一節 庇護性就業職場的挑戰…………………………….…………….…….……....79\r\n第二節 庇護性就業職場的省思…………………………….…………….…….……....93\r\n第伍章 結論與建議 100\r\n第一節 研究發現………………………………………………………………….……100\r\n第二節 研究建議……………………………………………………………..….….….105\r\n參考文獻\r\n附錄：訪談大綱\r\n表目錄\r\n表 1-1：研究訪談對象與代號一覽………………………………………………………..6\r\n表 2-1：經濟合作暨發展組織整理各國對「障礙」的定義…………..…………………9\r\n表 2-2：促進身心障礙者就業之主要措施整理…………………………………………15\r\n表 2-3：我國庇護工場相關立法與設置辦法的變化……………………………………42\r\n表 2-4：94年身心障礙者庇護工場及庇護性就業狀況報摘要……..………………….44\r\n表 2-5：國內各縣市庇護工場及庇護性就業設置數量變化……………………………46\r\n表 4-1：身心障礙福利服務機構辦理身心障礙者托育及養護收費及補助標準………85\r\n圖目錄\r\n圖 5-1：身心障礙者職業重建流程圖………………………………….…………..……108 | zh_TW |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094262025 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 庇護性就業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 庇護工場 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 職業輔導評量 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 身心障礙者權益保障法 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | 我國庇護性就業及其相關服務之探討─兼論身心障礙者權益保障法之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | 1.王育瑜(1995)，台灣視障者的職業困境－以按摩為例的分析。國立政治大學社會系研究所碩士論文。\r\n2.王雲東(2007)，從身心障礙者權益保障法談職業輔導評量之發展方向。就業安全，第二期，行政院勞委會職業訓練局。頁4-8。\r\n3.李基甸(2000)，身心障礙者職業輔導與職業安置。台北：中華民國智障家長總會。\r\n4.邱滿艷(2007)，我國各地方政府推動身心障礙這就業概貌，就業安全，第一期，行政院勞委會職業訓練局。頁78-83。\r\n5.林宏熾(2000)，多重障礙學生輔導手冊，國立台南師範學院。\r\n6.林千惠等合譯(1994)，美國支持性就業－模式、方法與論題。台北：行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。\r\n7.林世瑛(2000)，就業服務員對督導員對身心障礙者社區化就業服務意見之探討。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n8.林金定(2004)，智能障礙科學研究與發展－趨勢與展望，智能障礙科學研究與發展，第二期，第三號，頁126-133。\r\n9.吳秀照(2007)，身心障礙者就業需求與就業政策。台北：雙葉書廊有限公司。\r\n10.周惠玲、唐昌豪(2007)，由身心障礙者權益保障法修訂，談庇護工場的回顧與展望。就業安全，第二期，行政院勞委會職業訓練局。\r\n11.馬愷之(2004)，德國庇護工場政策及發展趨勢，行政院勞委會職業訓練局。\r\n12.陳怡如(1998)，喜憨兒也是快樂上班族－台灣心智障礙者就業現況之探討。國立台灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\r\n13.郭芳嫻(2004)，日本身心障礙者就業服務相關制度考察暨與事業體合作發展之庇護工場運作服務模式參訪-考察報告。臺北市政府。\r\n14.張幼慈(2004)，我國身心障礙者就業保障之研究－以定額進用制度為例。國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文。\r\n15.趙麗華(1993)，臺灣地區實施智障者支持性就業模式之現況及其相關問題之探討。台北：台灣師範大學特殊教育學研究所碩士論文。\r\n16.劉佳琪(2005)，從喜憨兒事件看智障者就業的困境。推波引水，第46期，頁11。\r\n17.藍介洲(2003)，生產與保護－台北市中重度視覺障礙者庇護性就業服務之探究。國立台灣大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。\r\n18. 魏仕哲(2000)，我國身心障礙者就業政策之研究。國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文。\r\n\r\n外文書目\r\n1.Barnes, C. & Mercer, G. (2005). Disability, Work and Welfare: challenging the social exclusion of disabled people, Work Employment and Society, 19(3):527-545.\r\n2.Conley, R. W. (1973). The economics of mental retardation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University press.\r\n3.Cimera, R. E. (2000). The monetary benefits and costs of hiring supported employees: A primer. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 17.\r\n4.Conte, L. E. (1982). Sheltered Employment Services and Programs. Research Contract No. 300-83-0006, National Institute of Handicapped Research, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.\r\n5.Crawford, C. (2004). Employment and related issues for people with intellectual disabilities. Toronto: The Roeher Institute.\r\n6.Cornell University(2007),2007 United States Disability Status Report. 參考網址：http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/edi/disabilitystatistics/StatusReports/2007-PDF/2007-StatusReport_US.pdfCFID=7410351&CFTOKEN=87946206&jsessionid=f0302adefcd6a4bd29e15d6115665a437823\r\n7.Delsen, L. (1996). Employment Opportunities for the Disabled, in: G. Schmid, J. O`Reilly and K. Schömann (eds.) International Handbook of Labour Market Policy and Evaluation, pp. 520-550, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.\r\n8.EC (1988). Report from the Commission on the Application of the Council Recommendation 86/379/EEC of 24 July 1986 on the Employment of Disabled People in the Community, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.\r\n9.European Commission (1988), Report from the Commission on the application of Council Recommendation 86/379/EEC of 24 July 1986 on the employment of disabled people in the Community, (COM (88) 745)\r\n10. European Social Fund Programme Evaluation Unit(ESFPEU)(1996), Training for People with Disabilities, Summary Report.\r\n11. Ecotec Research and Consulting Ltd. (2000), Benchmarking Employment Policies for People with Disabilities, a study prepared for the European Commission Directorate-General for Employment and Social Aff airs Unit EMPL/E/4.\r\n12. Li,E. P.-Y. (1998). Vocational aspirations of sheltered workshops workers with intellectual disability in Hong Kong. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43(3):208-217.\r\n13. Employment Horizon National Support Structure (2000), Employment Horizon: Final Report 2000-2005.\r\n14. Förster, M. (2007). FROM DISABILITY TO ABILITY－Policy challenges and trends in OECD countries. OECD Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Social Policy Division.參考網址：http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/8/31/38196029.pdf\r\n19.Greenleigh Associates,Inc.(1975). The role of the sheltered workshop in the rehabilitation of the severely handicapped, New York: Greenleigh Associates,Inc. (NARC Call. NO.00365).\r\n20.Gilmorem, D. S.,Schuster J. L. , Timmons. J. C. & Butterworth. J. (2000). An Analysis of Trends for People with MR, Cerebral Palsy, and Epilepsy Receiving Services from State VR Agencies. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 44(1):30-38.\r\n21.Goering(2002). Beyond the Medical Model? Disability, Formal Justice, and the Exception for the \"Profoundly Impaired\", Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 12(4):373-388.\r\n22.Gill, M. (2005).The myth of transition: contractualizing disability in the sheltered workshop, Disability & Society, 20(6): 613–623.\r\n23.International Labour Organization(1984). Adaptation of Jobs and the Employment of the Disabled. Geneva: ILO.\r\n24.Kaschade(1993), Hans-Jürgen. Die Integration Behinderter. Eine gesellschaftliche Herausforderung. Münster/New York.\r\n25.Krug, R. (1996),Sheltered Employment in the Netherlands—Recent Developments, Proceedings of a Conference "Disability and Employment: A Comparison between Ireland and Th e Netherlands＇held in the Royal Hospital, Kilmainham, 14th October.\r\n26.Kiernan, W. (2000).Where we are now: Perspectives on employment of persons with mental retardation. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15:90-97.\r\n27.Lunt, N. & Thornton P. (1993). Employment policies for disabled people. University of York.\r\n28.Leichsenring, K. & Strümpel, C., (eds.)(1994), Mandatory Employment or Equal Opportunities? Employment Policies for People with Disabilities in the UN-European Region, report of International Expert Meeting, Vienna 1-2 December.\r\n29.Laurent, V. (1998).\r\nSheltered employment for persons with disabilities, International Labour Review, 137(3):347-365.\r\n30.L＇Institut Roeher Institute(2004). Literature Review: Employment and Intellectual\r\nDisability–Best Practices, Alternatives and Economic Impacts.參考網址：http://www.communityinclusion.ca/site/Community_Inclusion_21/pdf/employment_intelldisab_litreview_2004.pdf\r\n31.Mallas, A. A.\r\n(1976). Current workshop practices:Strengths and weaknesses, Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 11:338-341.\r\n32.Miller, G. (1993).Expanding vocational options, Review, 25(1):27-31.\r\n33.Mont, D. (2004).Disability Employment Policy. Washington:World Bank,Social Protection Discussion Paper Series, No. 0413.\r\n34.Migliore, A. (2006).Sheltered workshops and individual employment: Perspectives of consumers, families, and staff members. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.\r\n35.Nisbet, J. & Vincent, L. (1986). The differences in inappropriate behavior and instructional interaction in sheltered and nonsheltered work environment, Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11:19-27.\r\n36.NACTE Steering Group Report (December 1997), Employment Challenges for the Millennium: A Strategy for employment for People with Disabilities in Sheltered and Supported Work and Employment.\r\n37.Noll, S. & Trent, J. W. (2004), Mental Retardation in America: A Historical Reader. New York: New York University Press.\r\n38.OECD (1992), Employment Policies for People with Disabilities: Report by an Evaluation Panel, Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, No. 8,Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.\r\n39.OECD (2003), Transforming Disability into Ability. Policies to Promote Work and Income Security for Disabled People. Paris: OECD.\r\n40.Rosen M, Bussone A, Dakunchak P & Cramp J. (1993). Sheltered Employment and the 2nd-Generation Workshop, Journal of Rehabilitation, 59 (1):30-34.\r\n41.Scheerenberger, R. C. (1987). A history of mental retardation: A quarter century of promise. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.\r\n42.Schuster, J. W.(1990). Sheltered workshops: financial and philosophical liabilities,\" Mental Retardirtion, 28, 4:233-239.\r\n43.Schell, J.L.M. (1991),Quotumregelingen in Verschillende Landen, Den Haag: Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.\r\n44.Samoy, E. & Waterplas,L. (1992). Sheltered Employment in the European Community, ECDG Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs.\r\n45.Seyfried, E. (1992).Requirement for the Successful Integration of Disabled People into Working Life: Summary Report on a Study Conducted in Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, Luxembourg: CEDEFOP.\r\n46.Samoy, E. & Waterplas, L. (1997). Sheltered Employment in Five Member States of the Council of Europe: in Austria, Finland, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland, Report to The Committee on the Rehabilitation and Integration of People With Disabilities, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.\r\n47. Silvers, A., Wasserman, T. D. & Mahowald B. M. (1998). Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy. Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc.\r\n48.Tom Martin & Associates/TMA(2001).Sheltered Employment：A review of the literature.參考網址：http://www.tma.ie/Publications/review_2001.pdf\r\n\r\n政府統計資料\r\n1.內政部統計處，內政統計通報，身心障礙者人數統計。\r\n參考網址：http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/week.aspx\r\n2.行政院勞委會(2006)，身心障礙者庇護工場及庇護性就業狀況調查報告。\r\n參考網址：http://opendoor.evta.gov.tw/attachment_file/0007111/9509%E5%BA%87%E8%AD%B7%E5%B7%A5%E5%A0%B4%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E8%B3%87%E6%96%99%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E.doc\r\n3.行政院勞委會(2008)，97年立案庇護工場名冊。(資料建置時間：97/10/07) | zh_TW |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.