Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94944
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor耿曙zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorKeng, Shuen_US
dc.contributor.author洪儷珊zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHorng, Li anen_US
dc.creator洪儷珊zh_TW
dc.creatorHorng, Li anen_US
dc.date2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-09T05:28:43Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-09T05:28:43Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-09T05:28:43Z-
dc.identifierG0095925009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94944-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description中國大陸研究英語碩士學程(IMCS)zh_TW
dc.description95925009zh_TW
dc.description.abstract兩岸關係迥異於世上其他分裂國家,自成一特殊格局,學界對兩岸關係及政府大陸政策之研究亦相當的多,本文的研究目的主要在探尋政府大陸政策之主導因素,是否隨著台灣的民主化進程及政黨輪替,而由「國家中心」轉為「社會中心」,亦即大陸政策反映何者的偏好與利益。依據本文的研究結果發現,民主進程初期的大陸政策,不論是高政治性議題或低政治性議題,其主導因素均屬「國家中心」;至民主進程後期,高政治性議題大陸政策之主導因素兼具「國家中心」與「社會中心」,而低政治性議題大陸政策之主導因素則屬「社會中心」。由此觀之,民主轉型改變了國家與社會的互動關係,也因為民主化的發展,致使國家逐漸開放與社會階層溝通,社會因素因此獲得參與政策決策過程的管道,使社會利益更易於轉化成國家政策。顯然,我政府大陸政策已非全由國家所主導,亦包含社會因素的介入。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe cross-Strait relations is completely different from those of other divided nations, numerous researches have been made focusing on the cross-Strait relations and Taiwan’s Mainland policies. According, the main object of this research is to explore if the leading factors of the Mainland polices should be transferred from “state-centered” to “society-centered” under the process of democratization and turnover of the political party, that is the Mainland policies reflect whose preference and interest afterall. According to the research results, we can find that in the initiate stage of democratic progress, no matter for Mainland policies of high politics or low politics, the leading factors are “state-centered”. However, in the later stage of democratic progress, the leading factors for the Mainland policies of high politics are both “state-centered” and “society-centered”, and the leading factors for the Mainland policies of low politics are “society-centered”. Therefore, it can be seen that democracy transformation has changed the interaction of state and society, and because of the development of democratization, the state gradually open up to communicate with social classes, so the social factors obtained the channels to participate in the process of policy-making. That is to say the social interests are easier to transfer to the national policies. Obviously, not all the Mainland polices are dominated by state; they also include social factors.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Introduction p.1\r\n1.1 Motivation\r\n1.2 Literature Review\r\n1.3 Framework, Methodology, and Limitation of Research\r\n2. Analysis of the Leading Factors of Government`s Mainland Policies p.12\r\n2.1 State-centered Theory\r\n2.2 Society-centered Theory\r\n3.The Mainland Policies in the Initial Stage of Democratic Progress p.22\r\n3.1 High Politics Issues\r\n3.2 Low Politics Issues\r\n3.3 Chapter Summary\r\n4. The Mainland Policies in the Later Stage of Democratic Progress p.58\r\n4.1 High Politics Issues\r\n4.2 Low Politics Issues\r\n4.3 Chapter Summary\r\n5. Conclusion p.86\r\n5.1 Research Findings\r\n5.2 Suggestion on Future Researches\r\nAppendix A Interview Outline and Test Form p.99\r\nAppendix B Interviewees List p.101 \r\nSelected Bibliography p.102zh_TW
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095925009en_US
dc.subject大陸政策zh_TW
dc.subject民主轉型zh_TW
dc.subject政黨輪替zh_TW
dc.subject民主進程zh_TW
dc.subjectMainland policiesen_US
dc.subjectdemocracy transformationen_US
dc.subjectturnover of the political partyen_US
dc.subjectdemocratic progressen_US
dc.title政府大陸政策之主導因素分析:「國家中心」與「社會中心」的論證研究zh_TW
dc.titleAnalysis of the leading factors of government`s Mainland policies -- research on \"state-centered\" and \"society-centered\"en_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.referenceChang, Chong-ben, proactive liberalization to strengthen the Taiwan manufacturers, United Daily News, August 17th, 2001, Edition 15.\r\nChang, Hsian-chao, Analysis of Sovereignty Dispute and Cross-Strait Prosperity Based on the “Theory of Two Countries”, Prospect Quarterly, Volume 1, Issue 1, January 2000.\r\nChen, Hong-yu, Discussion of Relation between Taiwan and Southeast Asia from Southward Policy, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Volume 3, Issue 1, January, 1998.\r\nChian, Fu, Implementation Performance Evaluation Report of Our Country’s Participation in UN Policies, October 12th, 1994, Legislative Yuan Foreign Affairs and Overseas Chinese Affairs Report (the 4th session on the 2nd meeting).\r\nChiu, Yih-ren: The President has been Keeping His Temper, United Daily News, February 28th, 2006, Edition A 3.\r\nDai, Wei-xin, “Analysis on the leader’s knowledge literacy in the twenty-first century”, Social Sciences in Nanjing, May 1, 2002.\r\nGao, Yueng-guang, 1995, New Trend of State Research in Politics, Taipei: Yueng-ran Cultural Publisher.\r\nGeorge Brunner, Zou, Zhong-ke and Huang, Song-rong translated, Theory of Comparative Government, Taipei: Wu-nan, 1995\r\nGuan, Hong-chang, The Authoritarian System Transformation and foreign policy of Taiwan: Discussion on the Formation of Joining the United Nations Policy, Master thesis, Politics Study Institution, National Taiwan University. 1996\r\nHsia, Le-sheng, Discussion on the Evolution and Influence of Mainland Trading Policy—from “no haste, be patient” policy to “proactive liberalization and effective management” and to “proactive management and effective liberalization”, Prospection and Exploration.\r\nHsiao, Hsin-huang, Orientation of Southward Policy from a Global view, National Policy Dynamic Analysis, Issue 169, July 22nd, 1997.\r\nHuang, Chia-shu, (Mutual Trust and Respect for relief of Taiwan Straits—Analysis of the deadlock from Mr. Wang’s visit to Taiwan to one China policy: Beijing site—One China Policy doesn’t exclude Separate Government), Win-win Strategy for Taiwan Straits, the 4th issue of Volume 5 (June, 1999)\r\nHuang, Tsi-hua, Lee Teng-Hui’s Governing Concept and Governing Policy, 1988-2004, doctoral thesis of Politics Studies Institution, National Taiwan University, June 2004.\r\nJiang, Bing-lun, The Introduction of Political Culture Research, Taipei: Zheng-zhong, 1986.\r\nKeng, Shu, 2002, “’Linkage Community’: An Analytic Conception of Cross-Strait Non-Governmental Interaction under WTO,” World Trade Organization and Cross-Strait Development, Guang-tai Xu, Xiao-qian Fang, Yueng-sheng Chen co-edited, Taipei: National Chengchi University, Institute of International Relations, (Volume of Academic Theses).\r\nKeng, Shu and Lin, Ruei-hua, April 29, 2004, “Political Influence of Cross-Strait Economic Integration: Analysis Structure of Cross-Strait Integration,” published in NanHua University, 2nd pan-Asian culture seminar, and “The influence of East Asia area integration on Taiwan safety and development,” Jiayi.\r\nLee, Chong-che, Inspection of Taiwan Manufacturer outward investment and Southward Policy, Theory and Policy, summer Issue, 1994.\r\nLee, Teng-hui, Taiwan’s Claim, (Taipei: Yuan-Liou Publishing Co., Ltd, May 20th, 1999)\r\nLee Teng-ke, Southward Policy and Pragmatic Diplomacy, Volume 33, Issue 6, June 1994.\r\nLee, Xiao-feng, “Taiwan’s democratic activities for 40 years”, Independent Evening News, 1987.\r\nLeng, Ze-gang, 1996, The Taiwan-China Connection: Democracy and Development Across the Taiwan Strait, Westview Press, A Division of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.\r\nLeng, Ze-gang, 1999, “Source of Mainland Economic and Trade Policies: Interaction of State and Society,” Contending Theories of Cross-Strait Relations Theory, Taipei: Wu-nan.\r\nLin, Chia-long, Tseng, Chian-yuan, Theory and Practice of Referendum Democracy: Struggling Process of Referendum Legislation, Persistence in Democracy: Referendum Democracy in Taiwan (Taipei: Taiwan Thinktank, July 2007.\r\nLin, De-chang, October 2006, “The Changing Patterns of State-Society Relations in Mainland China: A Theoretical Exploration,” published in Quarterly of Cross-Strait Interflow Prospect Foundation, Vol. 7, No. 4.\r\nLin, Zhong-xiu, Analysis on the Inner Environmental Factors of the Country Change in Taiwan’s Political Transformation, doctoral dissertation of San Min Chui Graduate School, National Taiwan Normal University, 2002.\r\nPeng, Chi-ping, Comparison and Analysis of Government’s Disposal Model on Significant Event across the Straits; Take “special state to state relations” and “one country on each side” as examples, Master thesis, Graduate program in National Development & Cross-strait Relations, Ming-Chuan University, May 2008.\r\nSkocpol, Theda, 1985, “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research,” in Evans et al. (ed.), Bringing the State Back In.\r\nShaw, Chong-hai, Untying the Knots: Critical Issues on Cross-Strait Relations, published in Symposium on Prospect for Relations across Taiwan Straits (Taipei: Asia-Europe Foundation and National Taipei University, December 19th, 2005).\r\nSu, Chi, Dangerous Edge: From the “Theory of Two Countries” to “one country on each side”. (Taipei: Commonwealth Publishing Co., Ltd, December 30th, 2003)\r\nTang, Yao-ming: Purchase of Anti-missile Weapons Even through the Referendum was not Passed, United Daily News, February 19th, 2004.\r\nTong, Zhong-xian, “Analysis on the leader’s aberration of behavior”, Theory exploration, April 1, 2002.\r\nTsai, Tong-rong, Plebiscite can express the general petition of Taiwan residents. The liberty times, September 19th, 1991, Edition 4.\r\nTsou, Jing-wen, An Account of Lee Teng-Hui in Power(Taipei: Rising Sun Publishing Co., Ltd, May 2001)\r\nWang, Da-cheng, Research on the strategies used by our government to promote joining the United Nations (1993-2004), Master thesis, Politics Study Institution, Chinese Culture University, June 2006\r\nWang, Li-yan, From the “State Capacity” to see Taiwan’s Mainland Policies, master thesis of Graduate Institute of East Asia Study, National Chengchi University, 2000.\r\nWu, Chung-li, “The Interest Group” edited by Yi-ian Chen, published in Politics(II), Taipei: Wu-nan, May, 2006.\r\nWu, Yu-shan, 1997, Balancing and Subordinate: Cross-Strait Relations Revisited, Taipei: Zheng-zhung.\r\nWu, Yu-shan, Tendency of Three Parties’ Mainland Policies: Abnormal Allocation of Electorate Preference and Vote Maximization Strategies, Theories and Polities, Issue 3, Volume 12 (September 1998)\r\nWu, Yu-shan, 1999, “Mainland Policy of Taiwan: Structure and Rationality,” Contending Theories of Cross-Strait Relations Theory, Taipei: Wu-nan.\r\nXie, Fu-sheng, “ Referendum: the reflection of the sovereignty of the people or the abuse of populism”, Issues and Studies, Volume 35, Issue 7, 1996.zh_TW
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.