Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99761


Title: 中國大陸中央對地方轉移支付之影響因子—以空間追蹤計量模型分析
Determinants of Transfers from Central to Local Governments in China─Evidence from Spatial Econometrics Analysis
Authors: 李奕碁
Li, I Chi
Contributors: 黃智聰
Huang, Jr Tsung
李奕碁
Li, I Chi
Keywords: 中央對地方轉移支付
地方在中央政治權力指數
空間自我相關
空間杜賓模型
transfer payments from central to local governments
political power in the central government
spatial autocorrelation
Spatial-Durbin model
Date: 2016
Issue Date: 2016-08-09 10:42:37 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 中國大陸之中央對地方轉移支付,為1994年分稅制改革以後,透過增劃中央稅收,提高中央政府平衡區域發展,及達成特定政策目標的財政工具。中央政府對地方之財政轉移支付,目標多以弭平省市地區間水平財政情況差異,以及提供省市地區公共支出之需求。然而,轉移支付的分配模式中,是否確實已平衡區域發展,並提供適足之公共支出財源為依歸?或者,其分配受到省市地區政府在中央政治權力的影響,對省市地區的利益可能造成什麼影響?省市地區在中央的代理人,其間的競爭與合作,最終究竟使省市地區多得利益,還是受到損害?本文之研究目的為,為具有區域同質性的中國大陸中央對地方轉移支付引進空間計量實證分析,並研究轉移支付分配模式之影響因子,資料期間為1995年至2013年,包含中國大陸共31個省市地區。引進空間計量之原因,係在以轉移支付分布圖之分析後,為捕捉各省市地區之間的轉移支付數量的相互影響性。在考慮空間相依性的實證模型分析下,更進一步分析財政容量因子、財政需求因子以及政治影響因子對轉移支付分配的現象,改善過去文獻關於政治權力解釋變數加權方式欠缺的理論基礎,以及實證模型設定上可能的疏漏。
本文實證模型透過檢定,決定使用隨機效果空間杜賓模型之分析結果,發現自1995年至2013年,各省市地區之人均轉移支付呈現顯著之空間相關性,而空間相依性之模式為,鄰近地區之轉移支付對該某省市地區具有顯著正向影響。此外,實證研究中,人均生產毛額、財政赤字率、扶養比、農村人口占比、少數民族占比,皆對人均財政轉移支付具有顯著正向影響;而省市地區在中央政治權力指標,則對轉移支付具有顯著負向影響,是為「代理人競爭資源流失效果」。
Since 1994, a tax revenue allocation system known as the “central to local transfer payments” has been implemented by China’s Central Government. The main policy objectives of transfer payments are about the elimination of the fiscal disparities among provinces, and the provision of public spending demands to specific policy.
As a fiscal policy tool, the transfer payment system endows the power for China's central government to balance the regional developments, and to achieve specific policy objectives such as environment protection, agricultural development, and political stability. However, through the mode of the allocation, are the transfer payments indeed balancing the regional developments, and providing the adequate financial resources of local expenditure? Or the allocation of transfer payments is affected by the political power of provinces and cities in the central government? Are the interests of the provinces and cities affected by the cooperation or competition of their agents in the central government? If the effects indeed exist, are they increasing benefits, or causing damage? The purpose of this study is to take research on the determinants to the transfer payments per capita, using the spatial econometrics model for the existence of spatial autocorrelation of the transfer payments. In consider of the spatial autocorrelation, the empirical study analyses the effects of the financial capacity factors, fiscal demand factors as well as the political power factor on the allocation of transfer payments, improving the theoretical basis that the past literatures built on the political power factors, and eliminating the omitted variable bias.
Considering the results of Moran’s I, Hausman test and Wald tests, I decided to use the random effect Spatial-Durbin model. The results show that from 1995 to 2013, transfer payments per capita among regions are significantly positive spatial correlated to one another. In addition, the result of spatial econometric analysis shows that the transfer payments per capita are significantly and positively affected by the gross province production per capita, fiscal deficit ratio, dependency ratio, the proportion of rural population and ethnic minorities; and the political power indicators of provinces have significant negative effect on transfer payments per capita. We call the negative effect of political power the “competition resource loss effect."
Reference: 一、英文文獻
Anselin, L. (1995), “Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA.” Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.
Anselin. L. and A. Bera (1998), “Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models with an Introduction to Spatial Econometrics.” In Ullah, A. and D. E. A. Giles (eds.), Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, 237–289. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Bo, Zhi Yue (2004), “The 16th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party: Formal Institutions and Factional Groups.” Journal of Contemporary China, 13(39), 223–225
Easton, David (1965), “The Theoretical Relevance of Political Socialization.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1(2), 1968, 125–146
Elhorst, J. P. (2010), “Maltab Software for Spatial Panels.” International Regional Science Review, 2014, 37(3), 389–405
Hillman, Ben (2010), “Factions and Spoils: Examing Political Behavior within the Local State in China.” The China Journal, 64, 1–18
Huang, Bihong and Kang Chen (2012), “Are Intergovernmental Transfer in China Equalizing?” China Economic Review, 23, 534–551
LeSage, J.P and R.K Pace (2009), ”Introduction to Spatial Econometrics.”Revue d'économie Industrielle, 123, 19–44.
Liou, Chih-Shian (2009), “Bureaucratic Politics and Overseas Investment by Chinese State-Owned Oil Companies” Asian Survey, 49(4), 670–690
Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, Baoyun Qian, Shuilin Wang, and Heng-Fu Zou (2006), “Local Public Finance in China: Intergovernmental Transfers.” China Economics and Management Academy Working Paper, No.552
Mobley, L. R., H. Frech, and L. Anselin (2009), “Spatial Interaction. Hospital Pricing and Hospital Antitrust.” International Journal of the Economics of Business, 16 (1), 1–17.
Moran, P.A.P. (1950), “Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena.” Biometrika, 37, 17–23
Shih, Victor and Zhang Qi (2007), “Who Receives Subsidies? A Look at the County Level in Two Time Periods.’’ In Vivienne Shue and Christine Wong (eds.), Paying for Progress in China: Public Finance, Human Welfare and Changing Patterns of Inequality, 145–-165. London: Routledge, Reissue edition (Routledge Contemporary China).
Shirk, Susan(1993), The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Tiebout, Charles M. (1956), “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.
Tsui, K. (2005), “Local Tax System, Intergovernmental Transfers and China’s Local Fiscal Disparities.” Journal of Comparative Economics, 33, 173–196
Wan, Xin, Yuanyuan Ma, and Kezhong Zhang (2015), “Political Determinants of Intergovernmental Transfers in a Regionally Decentralized Authoritarian Regime: Evidence from China.” Applied Economics, 47(27), 2803–2820.
Yang, Dali L. (1996), “Review: Governing China's Transition to the Market: Institutional Incentives, Politicians' Choices, and Unintended Outcomes.” World Politics, 48(3), 424 –452.
Sokal, R. R., N. L. Oden, and B. A. Thomson (1998), “Local Spatial Autocorrelation in Biological Variables.” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 65, 41–62.

二、中文文獻
王紹光(2002),「中國財政轉移支付的政治邏輯」,《戰略與管理》,2002年,第3期,頁1-25。
艾兆蕾(2005),《影響住宅區地價因素之空間分析—以鄉鎮與縣市為例》。台北:世新大學碩 未出版碩士論文。
吳鳳武(2013),「中央對地方轉移支付影響因素分析」,《經濟研究參考》,2013年,第67期,頁51–60。
周黎安(2004),「晉升博弈中政府官員的激勵與合作:兼論我國地方保護主義和重複建設問 題長期存在的原因」,《經濟研究》,2004年,第6期,頁33–40。
邱永翔、陳思遐(2012),「創新與研發、知識外溢之因果分析—以 G20 國家集團為例」,《經濟論文叢刊》,2012年,第40期,第4卷,頁515–538。
范子英(2011),「中國的財政轉移支付:目標、效果與遺留問題」,《南方經濟》,2011年,第6期,頁68–81。
徐斯勤(2007),「中國大陸中央與各省關係中的水平性與垂直性權力競爭」,《中國大陸研究》,2007年,第2期,頁1–34。
郭迺鋒、王信安、梁益誠(2009),「美國州際間商品流通之空間分析:SuperGIS與Flow Mapper 軟體應用」,《地理資訊系統季刊》,第3卷,第3期,頁31–36。
曾軍平(2000),「政府間轉移支付制度的財政平衡效應研究」,《經濟研究》,2000年,第6期,頁27–32。
楊光斌(2007),《中國政府與政治導論》。台北:五南出版。
蔡嘉裕(1998),「從大陸分稅制論其地方與中央之財政關係」,《中國大陸研究》,1998年,第11期,頁25–43。
Description: 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
103255014
Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1032550141
Data Type: thesis
Appears in Collections:[財政學系] 學位論文

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
014101.pdf1387KbAdobe PDF50View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing