學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 兒童摘取文章大意的能力
The Ability of Summarizing Texts in Children作者 楊韻平
Yang, Yun-Ping貢獻者 柯華葳
Ko Hua-Wei
楊韻平
Yang Yun-Ping關鍵詞 摘取大意能力
摘要能力
兒童
文章難度
Summarizing Text Ability
Summarizing Ability
Main ideas
Children
Text difficulty日期 1993
1993上傳時間 29-四月-2016 16:09:16 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究主要的目的是在探討年級、性別、文章程度對兒童摘取大意能力 參考文獻 李田英(民77 )學習成就之性別差異。 台北師院學報, 1 期， 119-13。 頁。 吳敏而(1989) 摘取文章大意的教材教法。台南師院77 學年度國語文學術研討會宣讀。 吳敏而(民79 )國語科大意教學怎能大意。 七十八年國民小學課程研究學術研討會專輯。 台灣省國民學校教師研習會出版。 汪榮才(民68 )教師行為、學生制握信念與學業成就。 台南師專學報， 12期， 111-132頁。 周何總主編(民76 )國語活用辭典。 台北:五南圖書出版公司。 林國樑編著(民75 )語文教學研究(修訂七版) 。 台北:童年書店。 黃昆輝(民68 )國民小學國語文教學績效之調查研究。 國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊， 21 輯，193-249 頁。 張春興、陳李網(民66 )國小男女生學業成績的性別差異與其教師，性別差異的關係。 教育心理學報, 10 期， 21-34 頁。 陳誕(民71 )國小教師之性別與其教學成績及學生學業成績之性別差異的關係。 國科會補助研究論文。 Asher, S.R., & Markell, R.A.(1974). Sex differences in comprehension of high-and-low-interest reading material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 680-687. Aulls, M.W.(1978). Developmental and remedial reading in the middle grades. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Aulls, M.W.(1986). Actively teaching main idea skills. In J.F. Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (PP.92-132). Newark. DE: International Reading Association. Bank, B.J., Briddle, B.J., & Good, T.L.(1980). Sex roles, classroom instruction and reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 119-132. Baumann, J. F. (1984). The effectiveness of a direct instruction paradigm for teaching m a i n ide a corn pre hen s ion. ~R e a din g Res ear c h Quarterly, 20(1), 93-115. Baumann, J.F.(1986). The direct instruction of maln idea comprehension ability. In J. F. Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (PP.133-178). Newark, DE:International Reading Association. Brown, A.L., & Day, J.D.(1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 1-14. Brown, A.L., Day, J.D., & Jones, R.D. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54 (4), 968-979. Brown, A.L .. & Smiley, S.S. (1977). Rating the importance of structure units of prose passage: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48(1). 1-8. Cunningham, J. W., & Moore, D. W. (1986). The confused world of main idea. In J. F. Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (PP.1-17). Newark. DE: International Reading Association. Duffelmeyer, F.A .. & Duffelmeyer, B.B. (1989, February). Are IRI passages suitable for assessing main idea comprehension? The Reading Teacher, PP.358-363. Hare, V.C., & Bingham, A.B.(1986). Teaching st- udents maln idea comprehension:Alternatives to repeated exposures. In J. F. Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (PP.179-194). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Hare, V.C., Rabinowitz, M., & Schieble, K.M. (1989). Text effects on main idea compre hension. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1), 72-88. Herman, M.C.(1975). Male-female achievement in eight learning areas: A compilation of selected assessment results. (Eric ED 072461) Hidi, S., & Anderson, V.(1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implication for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56 (4), 473-493. Johnson, N.S. (1983). What do you do if yor can`t tell the whole story? The development of summarization skills. In K.E. Nelson (Ed.), Children`s Language (Vol.4, PP.315- 381) . Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394. Lee, T.T.(李田英)(1987). The relationships of achievement, instruction. and family background to elementary school science achievement in the Republic of China. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ohio State University. (Eric ED 282724) Leinhardt, G., Seewald, A.M., & Engel, M. (1979). Learning what`s taught: Sex differences in instruction. Journal of Educati- 0nal Psychology, 2l(4) , 432-439. Lewis, J., & Hoover. H.D. (1983). Sex differences on standardized academic achievement text: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (Eric ED 233077) Meyer, B.J.F.(1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: NorthHolland. Meyer, B.J.F.(1985). Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems. In B. K. Britton & J.B. Black(Eds.), Understanding expository text (PP.11-64, 269-304). Hillsdale, NJ:La wrence Erlbaum Associates. Otto, W., Barrett, T.C., & Koenke, K. (1969). Assessment of children`s statements of the main idea in reading. In J.A. Figurel(Ed.), Reading and realism (PP.692-697). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Pearson, P.O., & Johnson, D.O. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Stahl. S.A., Jacobson, M.G., Davis, C.E .. & Davis, R.L.(1989). Prior Knowledge and difficult vocabulary in the comprehension of unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1),27-43. Will iams, J.P.(1984). Categorization, macrostructure, and finding the main idea. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 874-879. Williams, J.P.(1986). Research and instructional development on main idea skills. In J.F. Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehens ion (P P . 1 3 3 - 1 7 8). New ark, 0 E: I n t ern a t i 0 n-a 1 .Reading Association. Williams, J.P., Taylor, M.B., & deCani, J.S.(l 984). Constructing macrostructure for expo- sitory text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1065 - 1075. Williams, J.P., Taylor, M.B., & Ganger, S. (1981). Text va ri at ions at the 1 evel of the individual sentence and the comprehension of simple expository paragraphs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(6), 851-865. Williams, M., & stevens, V.M.R.(1972). Unders tanding paragraph structure. Journal of Reading, 15(7), 513-516. Winograd, P.N.(1984). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(4), 404-425. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
775214資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002003799 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 柯華葳 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Ko Hua-Wei en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 楊韻平 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Yang Yun-Ping en_US dc.creator (作者) 楊韻平 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Yang, Yun-Ping en_US dc.date (日期) 1993 en_US dc.date (日期) 1993 en_US dc.date.accessioned 29-四月-2016 16:09:16 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 29-四月-2016 16:09:16 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-四月-2016 16:09:16 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) B2002003799 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/88590 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 教育學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 775214 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究主要的目的是在探討年級、性別、文章程度對兒童摘取大意能力 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究問題………………………………………………………………4 第三節 重要名詞詮釋…………………………………………………………4 第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………7 第一節 大意的定義……………………………………………………………7 第二節 摘取文章大意的理論………………………………………………………………………9 第三節 摘取文章大意的研究……………………………………………………………………10 第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………………19 第一節 研究工具……………………………………………………………19 第二節 研究設計……………………………………………………………23 第三節 研究對象……………………………………………………………24 第四節 實施過程……………………………………………………………25 第五節 計分方法……………………………………………………………26 第六節 資料處理……………………………………………………………31 第七節 複本研究……………………………………………………………32 第四章 研究結果與討論…………………………………………………………37 第一節 不同年級在摘取大意程與成果上的 差異…………………………………………………………………37 第二節 不同性別在摘取大意過程與成果上的 差異…………………………………………………………………43 第三節 文章程度對摘取大意過程與成果的影 影……………………………………………………………………47 第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………….103 第一節 結論……………………………………………………………….103 第二節 建議……………………………………………………………….105 參考書目………………………………………………………………………….109 附錄一 研究工具……………………………………………………………….117 附錄二 成人在複本文章的作答資料………………………………………….129 附錄三 不同年級在摘取大意過程與成果上的差異 (複本文章) …………………………………………………………….135 附錄四 不同性別在摘取大意過程與成果上的差異 (複本文章) …………………………………………………………….139 複錄五 文章程度對摘取大意過程與成果的影響( 複本文章) ……………………………………………………………..143 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002003799 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 摘取大意能力 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 摘要能力 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 兒童 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 文章難度 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Summarizing Text Ability en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Summarizing Ability en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Main ideas en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Children en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Text difficulty en_US dc.title (題名) 兒童摘取文章大意的能力 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Ability of Summarizing Texts in Children en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李田英(民77 )學習成就之性別差異。 台北師院學報, 1 期， 119-13。 頁。 吳敏而(1989) 摘取文章大意的教材教法。台南師院77 學年度國語文學術研討會宣讀。 吳敏而(民79 )國語科大意教學怎能大意。 七十八年國民小學課程研究學術研討會專輯。 台灣省國民學校教師研習會出版。 汪榮才(民68 )教師行為、學生制握信念與學業成就。 台南師專學報， 12期， 111-132頁。 周何總主編(民76 )國語活用辭典。 台北:五南圖書出版公司。 林國樑編著(民75 )語文教學研究(修訂七版) 。 台北:童年書店。 黃昆輝(民68 )國民小學國語文教學績效之調查研究。 國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊， 21 輯，193-249 頁。 張春興、陳李網(民66 )國小男女生學業成績的性別差異與其教師，性別差異的關係。 教育心理學報, 10 期， 21-34 頁。 陳誕(民71 )國小教師之性別與其教學成績及學生學業成績之性別差異的關係。 國科會補助研究論文。 Asher, S.R., & Markell, R.A.(1974). Sex differences in comprehension of high-and-low-interest reading material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 680-687. Aulls, M.W.(1978). Developmental and remedial reading in the middle grades. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Aulls, M.W.(1986). Actively teaching main idea skills. In J.F. Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (PP.92-132). Newark. DE: International Reading Association. Bank, B.J., Briddle, B.J., & Good, T.L.(1980). Sex roles, classroom instruction and reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 119-132. Baumann, J. F. (1984). The effectiveness of a direct instruction paradigm for teaching m a i n ide a corn pre hen s ion. ~R e a din g Res ear c h Quarterly, 20(1), 93-115. Baumann, J.F.(1986). The direct instruction of maln idea comprehension ability. In J. F. Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (PP.133-178). Newark, DE:International Reading Association. Brown, A.L., & Day, J.D.(1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 1-14. Brown, A.L., Day, J.D., & Jones, R.D. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54 (4), 968-979. Brown, A.L .. & Smiley, S.S. (1977). Rating the importance of structure units of prose passage: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48(1). 1-8. Cunningham, J. W., & Moore, D. W. (1986). The confused world of main idea. In J. F. Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (PP.1-17). Newark. DE: International Reading Association. Duffelmeyer, F.A .. & Duffelmeyer, B.B. (1989, February). Are IRI passages suitable for assessing main idea comprehension? The Reading Teacher, PP.358-363. Hare, V.C., & Bingham, A.B.(1986). Teaching st- udents maln idea comprehension:Alternatives to repeated exposures. In J. F. Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (PP.179-194). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Hare, V.C., Rabinowitz, M., & Schieble, K.M. (1989). Text effects on main idea compre hension. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1), 72-88. Herman, M.C.(1975). Male-female achievement in eight learning areas: A compilation of selected assessment results. (Eric ED 072461) Hidi, S., & Anderson, V.(1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implication for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56 (4), 473-493. Johnson, N.S. (1983). What do you do if yor can`t tell the whole story? The development of summarization skills. In K.E. Nelson (Ed.), Children`s Language (Vol.4, PP.315- 381) . Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394. Lee, T.T.(李田英)(1987). The relationships of achievement, instruction. and family background to elementary school science achievement in the Republic of China. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ohio State University. (Eric ED 282724) Leinhardt, G., Seewald, A.M., & Engel, M. (1979). Learning what`s taught: Sex differences in instruction. Journal of Educati- 0nal Psychology, 2l(4) , 432-439. Lewis, J., & Hoover. H.D. (1983). Sex differences on standardized academic achievement text: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (Eric ED 233077) Meyer, B.J.F.(1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: NorthHolland. Meyer, B.J.F.(1985). Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems. In B. K. Britton & J.B. Black(Eds.), Understanding expository text (PP.11-64, 269-304). Hillsdale, NJ:La wrence Erlbaum Associates. Otto, W., Barrett, T.C., & Koenke, K. (1969). Assessment of children`s statements of the main idea in reading. In J.A. Figurel(Ed.), Reading and realism (PP.692-697). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Pearson, P.O., & Johnson, D.O. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Stahl. S.A., Jacobson, M.G., Davis, C.E .. & Davis, R.L.(1989). Prior Knowledge and difficult vocabulary in the comprehension of unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1),27-43. Will iams, J.P.(1984). Categorization, macrostructure, and finding the main idea. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 874-879. Williams, J.P.(1986). Research and instructional development on main idea skills. In J.F. Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehens ion (P P . 1 3 3 - 1 7 8). New ark, 0 E: I n t ern a t i 0 n-a 1 .Reading Association. Williams, J.P., Taylor, M.B., & deCani, J.S.(l 984). Constructing macrostructure for expo- sitory text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1065 - 1075. Williams, J.P., Taylor, M.B., & Ganger, S. (1981). Text va ri at ions at the 1 evel of the individual sentence and the comprehension of simple expository paragraphs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(6), 851-865. Williams, M., & stevens, V.M.R.(1972). Unders tanding paragraph structure. Journal of Reading, 15(7), 513-516. Winograd, P.N.(1984). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(4), 404-425. zh_TW
