1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 兒童摘取文章大意的能力
The Ability of Summarizing Texts in Children
作者 楊韻平
Yang, Yun-Ping
貢獻者 柯華葳
Ko Hua-Wei
楊韻平
Yang Yun-Ping
關鍵詞 摘取大意能力
摘要能力
兒童
文章難度
Summarizing Text Ability
Summarizing Ability
Main ideas
Children
Text difficulty
日期 1993
1993
上傳時間 29-Apr-2016 16:09:16 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究主要的目的是在探討年級、性別、文章程度對兒童摘取大意能力
參考文獻 李田英(民77 )學習成就之性別差異。 台北師院學報, 1 期， 119-13。 頁。
     吳敏而(1989) 摘取文章大意的教材教法。台南師院77 學年度國語文學術研討會宣讀。
     吳敏而(民79 )國語科大意教學怎能大意。 七十八年國民小學課程研究學術研討會專輯。 台灣省國民學校教師研習會出版。
     汪榮才(民68 )教師行為、學生制握信念與學業成就。 台南師專學報， 12期， 111-132頁。
     周何總主編(民76 )國語活用辭典。 台北:五南圖書出版公司。
     林國樑編著(民75 )語文教學研究(修訂七版) 。 台北:童年書店。
     黃昆輝(民68 )國民小學國語文教學績效之調查研究。 國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊， 21 輯，193-249 頁。
     張春興、陳李網(民66 )國小男女生學業成績的性別差異與其教師，性別差異的關係。 教育心理學報, 10 期， 21-34 頁。
     陳誕(民71 )國小教師之性別與其教學成績及學生學業成績之性別差異的關係。 國科會補助研究論文。
     
     
     
     Asher, S.R., & Markell, R.A.(1974). Sex differences in comprehension of high-and-low-interest reading material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 680-687.
     Aulls, M.W.(1978). Developmental and remedial
     reading in the middle grades. Boston: Allyn
     and Bacon.
     Aulls, M.W.(1986). Actively teaching main idea
     skills. In J.F. Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main
     idea comprehension (PP.92-132). Newark. DE:
     International Reading Association.
     Bank, B.J., Briddle, B.J., & Good, T.L.(1980).
     Sex roles, classroom instruction and
     reading achievement. Journal of Educational
     Psychology, 72(2), 119-132.
     Baumann, J. F. (1984). The effectiveness of a
     direct instruction paradigm for teaching
     m a i n ide a corn pre hen s ion. ~R e a din g Res ear c h
     Quarterly, 20(1), 93-115.
     Baumann, J.F.(1986). The direct instruction of
     maln idea comprehension ability. In J. F.
     Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension
     (PP.133-178). Newark, DE:International
     Reading Association.
     Brown, A.L., & Day, J.D.(1983). Macrorules for
     summarizing texts: The development of expertise.
     Journal of Verbal Learning and
     Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 1-14.
     Brown, A.L., Day, J.D., & Jones, R.D. (1983).
     The development of plans for summarizing
     texts. Child Development, 54 (4), 968-979.
     Brown, A.L .. & Smiley, S.S. (1977). Rating the
     importance of structure units of prose passage:
     A problem of metacognitive development.
     Child Development, 48(1). 1-8.
     Cunningham, J. W., & Moore, D. W. (1986). The
     confused world of main idea. In J. F.
     Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension
     (PP.1-17). Newark. DE: International
     Reading Association.
     Duffelmeyer, F.A .. & Duffelmeyer, B.B. (1989,
     February). Are IRI passages suitable for
     assessing main idea comprehension? The Reading
     Teacher, PP.358-363.
     Hare, V.C., & Bingham, A.B.(1986). Teaching st-
     udents maln idea comprehension:Alternatives
     to repeated exposures. In J. F. Baumann
     (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension
     (PP.179-194). Newark, DE: International
     Reading Association.
     Hare, V.C., Rabinowitz, M., & Schieble, K.M.
     (1989). Text effects on main idea compre hension.
     Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1),
     72-88.
     Herman, M.C.(1975). Male-female achievement in
     eight learning areas: A compilation of selected
     assessment results. (Eric ED 072461)
     Hidi, S., & Anderson, V.(1986). Producing written
     summaries: Task demands, cognitive
     operations, and implication for instruction.
     Review of Educational Research, 56
     (4), 473-493.
     Johnson, N.S. (1983). What do you do if yor
     can`t tell the whole story? The development
     of summarization skills. In K.E. Nelson
     (Ed.), Children`s Language (Vol.4, PP.315-
     381) .
     Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a
     model of text comprehension and production.
     Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394.
     Lee, T.T.(李田英)(1987). The relationships of
     achievement, instruction. and family background
     to elementary school science achievement
     in the Republic of China. Unpublished
     doctoral dissertation. Ohio State
     University. (Eric ED 282724)
     Leinhardt, G., Seewald, A.M., & Engel, M.
     (1979). Learning what`s taught: Sex differences
     in instruction. Journal of Educati-
     0nal Psychology, 2l(4) , 432-439.
     Lewis, J., & Hoover. H.D. (1983). Sex differences
     on standardized academic achievement
     text: A longitudinal study. Paper presented
     at the annual meeting of the American Educational
     Research Association. (Eric ED
     233077)
     Meyer, B.J.F.(1975). The organization of prose
     and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: NorthHolland.
     Meyer, B.J.F.(1985). Prose analysis: Purposes,
     procedures, and problems. In B. K. Britton
     & J.B. Black(Eds.), Understanding expository
     text (PP.11-64, 269-304). Hillsdale, NJ:La
     wrence Erlbaum Associates.
     Otto, W., Barrett, T.C., & Koenke, K. (1969).
     Assessment of children`s statements of the
     main idea in reading. In J.A. Figurel(Ed.),
     Reading and realism (PP.692-697). Newark,
     DE: International Reading Association.
     Pearson, P.O., & Johnson, D.O. (1978). Teaching
     reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart
     & Winston.
     Stahl. S.A., Jacobson, M.G., Davis, C.E .. & Davis,
     R.L.(1989). Prior Knowledge and difficult
     vocabulary in the comprehension of
     unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly,
     24(1),27-43.
     Will iams, J.P.(1984). Categorization, macrostructure,
     and finding the main idea. Journal
     of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 874-879.
     Williams, J.P.(1986). Research and instructional
     development on main idea skills. In J.F.
     Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehens
     ion (P P . 1 3 3 - 1 7 8). New ark, 0 E: I n t ern a t i 0 n-a 1
     .Reading Association.
     Williams, J.P., Taylor, M.B., & deCani, J.S.(l
     984). Constructing macrostructure for expo-
     sitory text. Journal of Educational Psychology,
     76(6), 1065 - 1075.
     Williams, J.P., Taylor, M.B., & Ganger, S.
     (1981). Text va ri at ions at the 1 evel of the
     individual sentence and the comprehension
     of simple expository paragraphs. Journal of
     Educational Psychology, 73(6), 851-865.
     Williams, M., & stevens, V.M.R.(1972). Unders tanding
     paragraph structure. Journal of
     Reading, 15(7), 513-516.
     Winograd, P.N.(1984). Strategic difficulties in
     summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly,
     19(4), 404-425.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
775214
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002003799
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 柯華葳zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Ko Hua-Weien_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 楊韻平zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Yang Yun-Pingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 楊韻平zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Yang, Yun-Pingen_US
dc.date (日期) 1993en_US
dc.date (日期) 1993en_US
dc.date.accessioned 29-Apr-2016 16:09:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 29-Apr-2016 16:09:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Apr-2016 16:09:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002003799en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/88590-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 775214zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究主要的目的是在探討年級、性別、文章程度對兒童摘取大意能力zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………1
     第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………………………1
     第二節 研究問題………………………………………………………………4
     第三節 重要名詞詮釋…………………………………………………………4
     第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………7
     第一節 大意的定義……………………………………………………………7
     第二節 摘取文章大意的理論………………………………………………………………………9
     第三節 摘取文章大意的研究……………………………………………………………………10
     第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………………19
     第一節 研究工具……………………………………………………………19
     第二節 研究設計……………………………………………………………23
     第三節 研究對象……………………………………………………………24
     第四節 實施過程……………………………………………………………25
     第五節 計分方法……………………………………………………………26
     第六節 資料處理……………………………………………………………31
     第七節 複本研究……………………………………………………………32
     第四章 研究結果與討論…………………………………………………………37
     第一節 不同年級在摘取大意程與成果上的
     差異…………………………………………………………………37
     第二節 不同性別在摘取大意過程與成果上的
     差異…………………………………………………………………43
     第三節 文章程度對摘取大意過程與成果的影
     影……………………………………………………………………47
     第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………….103
     第一節 結論……………………………………………………………….103
     第二節 建議……………………………………………………………….105
     
     參考書目………………………………………………………………………….109
     附錄一 研究工具……………………………………………………………….117
     附錄二 成人在複本文章的作答資料………………………………………….129
     附錄三 不同年級在摘取大意過程與成果上的差異
      (複本文章) …………………………………………………………….135
     附錄四 不同性別在摘取大意過程與成果上的差異
      (複本文章) …………………………………………………………….139
     複錄五 文章程度對摘取大意過程與成果的影響(
      複本文章) ……………………………………………………………..143		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002003799en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 摘取大意能力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 摘要能力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 兒童zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 文章難度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Summarizing Text Abilityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Summarizing Abilityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Main ideasen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Childrenen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Text difficultyen_US
dc.title (題名) 兒童摘取文章大意的能力zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Ability of Summarizing Texts in Childrenen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李田英(民77 )學習成就之性別差異。 台北師院學報, 1 期， 119-13。 頁。
     吳敏而(1989) 摘取文章大意的教材教法。台南師院77 學年度國語文學術研討會宣讀。
     吳敏而(民79 )國語科大意教學怎能大意。 七十八年國民小學課程研究學術研討會專輯。 台灣省國民學校教師研習會出版。
     汪榮才(民68 )教師行為、學生制握信念與學業成就。 台南師專學報， 12期， 111-132頁。
     周何總主編(民76 )國語活用辭典。 台北:五南圖書出版公司。
     林國樑編著(民75 )語文教學研究(修訂七版) 。 台北:童年書店。
     黃昆輝(民68 )國民小學國語文教學績效之調查研究。 國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊， 21 輯，193-249 頁。
     張春興、陳李網(民66 )國小男女生學業成績的性別差異與其教師，性別差異的關係。 教育心理學報, 10 期， 21-34 頁。
     陳誕(民71 )國小教師之性別與其教學成績及學生學業成績之性別差異的關係。 國科會補助研究論文。
     
     
     
     Asher, S.R., & Markell, R.A.(1974). Sex differences in comprehension of high-and-low-interest reading material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 680-687.
     Aulls, M.W.(1978). Developmental and remedial
     reading in the middle grades. Boston: Allyn
     and Bacon.
     Aulls, M.W.(1986). Actively teaching main idea
     skills. In J.F. Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main
     idea comprehension (PP.92-132). Newark. DE:
     International Reading Association.
     Bank, B.J., Briddle, B.J., & Good, T.L.(1980).
     Sex roles, classroom instruction and
     reading achievement. Journal of Educational
     Psychology, 72(2), 119-132.
     Baumann, J. F. (1984). The effectiveness of a
     direct instruction paradigm for teaching
     m a i n ide a corn pre hen s ion. ~R e a din g Res ear c h
     Quarterly, 20(1), 93-115.
     Baumann, J.F.(1986). The direct instruction of
     maln idea comprehension ability. In J. F.
     Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension
     (PP.133-178). Newark, DE:International
     Reading Association.
     Brown, A.L., & Day, J.D.(1983). Macrorules for
     summarizing texts: The development of expertise.
     Journal of Verbal Learning and
     Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 1-14.
     Brown, A.L., Day, J.D., & Jones, R.D. (1983).
     The development of plans for summarizing
     texts. Child Development, 54 (4), 968-979.
     Brown, A.L .. & Smiley, S.S. (1977). Rating the
     importance of structure units of prose passage:
     A problem of metacognitive development.
     Child Development, 48(1). 1-8.
     Cunningham, J. W., & Moore, D. W. (1986). The
     confused world of main idea. In J. F.
     Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension
     (PP.1-17). Newark. DE: International
     Reading Association.
     Duffelmeyer, F.A .. & Duffelmeyer, B.B. (1989,
     February). Are IRI passages suitable for
     assessing main idea comprehension? The Reading
     Teacher, PP.358-363.
     Hare, V.C., & Bingham, A.B.(1986). Teaching st-
     udents maln idea comprehension:Alternatives
     to repeated exposures. In J. F. Baumann
     (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension
     (PP.179-194). Newark, DE: International
     Reading Association.
     Hare, V.C., Rabinowitz, M., & Schieble, K.M.
     (1989). Text effects on main idea compre hension.
     Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1),
     72-88.
     Herman, M.C.(1975). Male-female achievement in
     eight learning areas: A compilation of selected
     assessment results. (Eric ED 072461)
     Hidi, S., & Anderson, V.(1986). Producing written
     summaries: Task demands, cognitive
     operations, and implication for instruction.
     Review of Educational Research, 56
     (4), 473-493.
     Johnson, N.S. (1983). What do you do if yor
     can`t tell the whole story? The development
     of summarization skills. In K.E. Nelson
     (Ed.), Children`s Language (Vol.4, PP.315-
     381) .
     Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a
     model of text comprehension and production.
     Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394.
     Lee, T.T.(李田英)(1987). The relationships of
     achievement, instruction. and family background
     to elementary school science achievement
     in the Republic of China. Unpublished
     doctoral dissertation. Ohio State
     University. (Eric ED 282724)
     Leinhardt, G., Seewald, A.M., & Engel, M.
     (1979). Learning what`s taught: Sex differences
     in instruction. Journal of Educati-
     0nal Psychology, 2l(4) , 432-439.
     Lewis, J., & Hoover. H.D. (1983). Sex differences
     on standardized academic achievement
     text: A longitudinal study. Paper presented
     at the annual meeting of the American Educational
     Research Association. (Eric ED
     233077)
     Meyer, B.J.F.(1975). The organization of prose
     and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: NorthHolland.
     Meyer, B.J.F.(1985). Prose analysis: Purposes,
     procedures, and problems. In B. K. Britton
     & J.B. Black(Eds.), Understanding expository
     text (PP.11-64, 269-304). Hillsdale, NJ:La
     wrence Erlbaum Associates.
     Otto, W., Barrett, T.C., & Koenke, K. (1969).
     Assessment of children`s statements of the
     main idea in reading. In J.A. Figurel(Ed.),
     Reading and realism (PP.692-697). Newark,
     DE: International Reading Association.
     Pearson, P.O., & Johnson, D.O. (1978). Teaching
     reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart
     & Winston.
     Stahl. S.A., Jacobson, M.G., Davis, C.E .. & Davis,
     R.L.(1989). Prior Knowledge and difficult
     vocabulary in the comprehension of
     unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly,
     24(1),27-43.
     Will iams, J.P.(1984). Categorization, macrostructure,
     and finding the main idea. Journal
     of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 874-879.
     Williams, J.P.(1986). Research and instructional
     development on main idea skills. In J.F.
     Baumann(Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehens
     ion (P P . 1 3 3 - 1 7 8). New ark, 0 E: I n t ern a t i 0 n-a 1
     .Reading Association.
     Williams, J.P., Taylor, M.B., & deCani, J.S.(l
     984). Constructing macrostructure for expo-
     sitory text. Journal of Educational Psychology,
     76(6), 1065 - 1075.
     Williams, J.P., Taylor, M.B., & Ganger, S.
     (1981). Text va ri at ions at the 1 evel of the
     individual sentence and the comprehension
     of simple expository paragraphs. Journal of
     Educational Psychology, 73(6), 851-865.
     Williams, M., & stevens, V.M.R.(1972). Unders tanding
     paragraph structure. Journal of
     Reading, 15(7), 513-516.
     Winograd, P.N.(1984). Strategic difficulties in
     summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly,
     19(4), 404-425.		zh_TW