1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 組織中人員績效考評運作之研究-績效考評模式之實證調查與分析
THE STUDY OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN ORGANIZATION
作者 姜慶芸
CHIANG, CHIN YUN
貢獻者 孫本初
SUN,BEN CHU
姜慶芸
CHIANG,CHIN YUN
關鍵詞 績效考評
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
日期 1993
上傳時間 29-Apr-2016 16:35:08 (UTC+8)
摘要 績效考評是人力資源管理的重要課題，正確且有效的績效考評制度具有激
參考文獻 1. 王志剛譯， Gary Dessl er 著，管理學導論，台北:華泰書
     局，民國七十二年初版。
     2 許演松，人事行政，台北:華視文化出版社，民國七十六
     年初版(a) 。
     3. 陳國嘉，如何績效考核，台北:遠流出版公司，民國八十
     年初版。
     4. 張潤書，行政學，台北:三民書局，民國七十六年再增訂
     再版。
     5. 張潤書編譯，組織行為與管理，台北:五南圖書出版公司，
     民國七十四年再版。
     6. 殷文俊主持，當前行政機關公務人員士氣之研究，台北:
     行政院研究發展考核委員會編印，民國七十四年。
     7. 黃英忠，現代人力資源管理，台北:華泰書局，民國七十
     八年初版。
     8 鄭耀本，日本人事勞務管理，台北:書泉出版社，民國七
     十九年初版。
     9. 謝安田，人事管理，民國七十七年，台北:自印，五版。
     10. 傅肅良，考銓制度，台北:三民書局，民國七十六年，
     三修訂初版。
     11. 繆全吉、彭錦鵬、顧慕晴及蔡良文等編著，人事行政，
     台北:國立空中大學印行，民國七十九年修正再版。
     12. 蔡承志等譯，羅賓森原著，組織行為，台北:桂冠圖書
     公司，民國七十六年再版。
     中文期刊
     1. 林榮欽，「績效評估在人事管理上的運用」，人事月刊，
     第28 卷第1 期，頁4-14 0
     2. 施能傑「考績謬誤的類型與原因:理論闡述與經驗分析
     (上)、(下) 」，人事月刊，第14 卷第3.4期，民國八
     十一年三、四月，頁4 -12;頁4-16 。
     3. 許濱松，「改進考績激勵士氣」 行政管理論文選輯，第
     二輯，考試院銓敘部編印」，民國七十六年(b) ，頁247-279。
     4. 蔡正仁， 「 人事考核制度的改進」，人力資源經理雜誌，
     第二期，民國八十年八月，頁71-74 。
     5. 華力進， 「 政治行為研究途徑」，國立政治大學學報，第
     十二期，民國五十四年十二月，頁340-366。
     6 羅淑蕙，「一個有效考績模型的揭示一如何使考績更為切
     實有效」 人事管理，第5 卷第5期，民國七十六年十一
     月，頁30 -33。
     學位論文
     1. 丁立平，我國現行公務人員考績制度之研究，國立政治大
     學公共行政研究所，碩士論文，民國七十年六月。
     2. 卜正球，員工績效考評各面向之探討，國立政治大學公共
     行政研究所，碩士論文，民國七十八年一月。
     3. 朱金池，組織成員考核制度運作之研究，國立政治大學公
     共行政研究所，碩士論文，民國七十七年六月。
     4. 張翠娟，員工績效評估制度與功能之研究，國立臺灣大學
     政治研究所，碩士論文，民國八十年七月。
     
     
     
     I.Baird, L. S.,Schneier, C. E.,and Beatty, R. W.
     (ed. )
     1988, The Strategic Human Resource Management
     Sourcebook,Mass. :Human Resource Development
     Press.
     2.Bernardin, J. H. ,and Beatty, W. R.
     1984, Performance Appraisal :Assessing Human
     Behavior At Work, Mass. :Kent Publ ishing
     Co.
     3.Cascio, W. F. ,and Awad, E. M.
     1981, Human Resources Management,Virginia:Reston
     Publishing Co .
     4.Cummings, L. L. ,and Schwab, D. P.
     1973, Performance in Organization, III inois:
     Scott, Foresman Co.
     5.Dessler, G.
     1978, Personnel Management:Modern Concepts and
     Techniques,Virginia:Reston Publ ishing Co.
     6.Devries,D. L., Morrison,A. M. ,Shullman,S. L. ,and
     Gerlach,M. L.
     1981, Performance Appraisal on the Line, New
     York: John Wiley & Sons.
     7.Dyke, V. V.
     1960, Political Science: A Phi losophical
     Analysis, Standford: Standford University
     Press.
     S.Hall, D. T. and Goodale, J . G.
     1986, Human Resource Management, I I 1 inois
     Scott, Foresman Co.
     9.Hay, S. W. ,and Kearney, R. C. (ed.)
     1990, Public Personnel Administration, New
     Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.,(2nd ed.).
     10.Herriot, P. (ed.)
     1989, Assessment and Selection in Organizations,
     England:John Wi ley & Sons.
     II.Ivancevich, J. M., Szi lagyi, A. D. ,and Wallace
     Jr ., M. J.
     1977, Organizational Behavior And Performance,
     Ca. : Goodyear.
     12.Landy, F. J. ,and Farr, J . L.,
     1983, The Measurement of Work Performance:
     Methods, Theory and Applications,New
     York:Academic Press.
     13.Latham, G. P. ,and Wexley, K. N.
     1981, Increasing Productivity Through Performance
     Appraisal, Mass. :Addison-Wesley.
     14.Mohrman Jr. ,A. M., Resnick-West,S. M. ,and Lawler
     III,E. E.
     1989 Designing Performance Appraisal Systems,
     Ca. : J ossey- Bass Pub 1 i sher .
     IS.Morrisey, G. L.
     1983, Performance Appraisal In Business and
     Industry, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
     16.Schuler, S. R.
     1987, Personnel And Human Resource Management,
     3th Edition, West Publishing Co.
     17.Shneier, C. E., Beatty, R. W.,and Baird, L. S.
     ( ed . )
     1987, The Performance Management Sourcebook,
     Mass.: Human Resource Deve lopment Press.
     I8.Stone, T. H.
     1982, Understanding Personnel Management, New
     York: The Dryder Press.
     19.5wan, W. S.
     1991, How to Do a Superior Performance Appraisal,
     New York: John Wi ley & Sons.
     20.Szilagyi, A. D. Jr., Wallace, J. M. Jr.
     1987, Organizational Behavior & Performance,(4
     th ed.), Illinois: Scott, Foresman Co.
     英文期刊與文章
     1. Ash, R. A. ,and Levine, E. L.
     1980, r A Framework For Evaluating Job Analysis
     MethodsJ ,Personnel,57,pp.53-59.
     2. Bernardin, H. J.
     1978, rEffects of Rater Training on Leniency
     and Halo Errors in Student Ratings of
     InstructorsJ , Journal of Appl ied Psychology,
     63,pp.301-308.
     3. Borman, W. C.
     1978, rExploring Upper Limits of ReI iabi I ity
     and Validity in Job Performance RatingsJ ,
     Journal of Applied Phychology,63,pp.
     135-144.
     4. Borman, W. C.
     1979, rFormat and Training Effects on Rating
     Accuracy and Rater ErrorsJ , Journal od
     Appl ied Psychology, 64,pp.410-421.
     5. Borman, W. C. ,White, L. A. ,Pulakos, E. D.land
     Oppler, S. H.
     1991, rModel of Supervisory Job Performance
     RatingsJ , Journal of Appl ied Psychology,
     76,pp.863-872.
     6. Carlyle, J. J. ,and Ellison, F. T.
     1987, rDeveloping Performance StandardsJ In
     The Performance Management Source Book,
     Edited By E. C. Schneier, W. R. Beatty,
     and S. L. Bair, Human Resource Development
     Press,pp.76-78 .
     7. Cederblom, D.
     1987, rThe Performance Appraisal Interview: A
     Review, Implication and suggestionJ , in
     The Performance Management Source Book,
     Edited by E. C. Schneier, N. R. Beatty,
     S. L. Ba i rd, Mass.: Human Resources Development
     Press,pp.134-141.
     8. Cleveland, J. N. ,and Landy, F. J.
     1981, rThe Influence of Rater and Ratee Age on
     Two Performance JudgementsJ ,Journal of
     Personnel Psychology,34,pp.19-29.
     9. Cleveland, J. N.,Murphy, K. R.,and Williams, R.
     E.
     1989, rMultiple Uses of Performance Appraisal:
     Prevalence and CorrelatesJ , Journal of
     Applied Psychology, 74,pp.130-l35.
     lO.Daley, D.
     1983, rperformance Appraisal as a Guide for
     Training and Development:A Research Note
     on the Iowa Performance Evaluation SystemJ ,
     Public Personnel Management Journal,12(2),
     pp.159-l66.
     11.DeCotiis, T. A.,and Petit, A.
     1978, rThe Performance Appraisal Process: A
     Model and Some Testable PropositionsJ ,
     Academy of Management Review,3(3),635-64
     5.
     12.DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T. P.,and Meglino, B. M.
     1984, rA Cognitive View of Performance Appraisl
     Process: A Model and Research Propositions,
     Organizational Behavior and Human
     Performance,33, pp.360-369.
     13 . DeN i s i, A. S., and Will i ams, K. J.
     1988, rCognitive Approaches to Performance AppraisalJ,
     in K. M. Rowland and G. R.
     Ferris(eds.),Research in Personnel and
     Human Resource Management, vo 1.6, Greenwich,
     CT:JAI,pp.109-155.
     14.Dipboye, R. L. ,Arvey, R. D. ,and Terpstra, D. E.
     1977, `Sex and Physical Attractivenes of Raters
     and Applicants as Determinants of Resume
     EvaluationsJ ,Journal of Applied Psychology,
     62, pp.288-294.
     15.Dipboye, R. L.
     1985, `Some Neglected Variables In Research on
     Discrimination in AppraisalJ , Academy of
     Management Review,10(1),pp. 116-127.
     16.Doerflein, S.
     1985, `Directions for Career PlanningJ ,in The
     Performance Management Source-Book,
     Edited by E. C. Schneier, N. R. Beatty,
     S. L. Baird, Mass. :Human Resources Development
     Press,pp . 189-196.
     17.Dulewicz V. ,and Fletcher C.
     1989, `The Context and Dynamics of Performance
     AppraisalJ in Assessment and Selection in
     Organization, Edited by P. Herriot, England:
     John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
     18.Feldman, J . M.
     1981, `Beyond Attribution Theory: Cognitive
     Processes in Performance AppraisalJ ,
     Journal of Appl ied Psychology, 66, pp.
     127-148.
     19.Fomburn, C. J. ,and Laud, R. L.
     1983, r Strategic Issues in Performance Appraisal
     : Theory and PracticeJ , Personnel,
     60,Nov.IDec.pp.23-31
     20.Fox, S. ,and Dinner, Y.
     1988, rValidity of Self-Assessment: A Field
     EvaluationJ ,Personnel Psychology,41,pp.
     581-592.
     21.Funder, D. C.
     1987, rErrors and Mistakes: Evaluating the Accuracy
     of Social JudgementJ ,Psychological
     Bulletin, 101,pp.75-90.
     22.Herbert, G. R. ,and Doverspike, Dennis
     1990, rperformance Appraisal in the Training
     Need Analysis Process: A Review and CritiqueJ,
     Public Personnel Management,19
     (3),pp.253-269.
     23.Hoffman, C. C., Natham B. R. ,and Holden, L. M.
     1991, rA Comparison of Validation Criteria:Objective
     Versus Subjective Performance
     Measures and Self Versus Supervisor RatingsJ
     ,Personnel Psychology,44,pp.601-619
     24.Jacobs, R. ,and Kozlowski, S. W.
     1985, r A Closer Look at Halo Error in Perfor-
     mance RatingsJ , Academy of Management
     Journal,28, pp.201-212.
     25.Kingstrom, P. O. ,and Mainstone, L. E.
     1985, `Investigation of Rater-Ratee ACQuaintance
     and Rater BiasJ , Academy of Management
     Journal,28,pp.641-653.
     26.Klein, H. J., Snell, A. S.,and Wexley, N. K.
     1987, `Systems Model of the Performance Appraisal
     Interview ProcessJ , Industrial
     Relations, 26,pp.267-280
     27.Knowlton Jr., W. A., and Mitchell, T. R.
     1980, `Effects of Causal Attributions on Supervisor`s
     Evaluation of Subordinate
     PerformanceJ ,Journal of ApRI ied Psychology,
     65,pp.459-466 .
     28.Lovrich Jr., N. P.
     1990, rperformance Appraisal J , In S. W. Hays
     and R. C. Kearney (2nd ed.) Publ ic Personnel
     Administration, New Jersey: Prentice-
     Hall Inc., pp.91-103.
     29.Mai-Dalton, R. R.,Feldman-Summers, S.,and
     Mitchell,T. R.
     1979, rEffect of Employee Gender and Behavioral
     Style on the Evaluations of Male and Fe-
     male Banking Executives, Journal of AppI
     ied Psychology,64,pp.221-226.
     30.Meyer, H. H., Kay, E. ,and French Jr., P.
     1965, rSplit Roles in Performance AppraisalJ ,
     Harvard Business Reveiw, 43(1), pp.
     123-129.
     31.Meyer, H. H.
     1991, r A Solution to the Performance appraisal
     feedback enigmaJ , Academy of Management
     Executives, 5(1),pp.68-76.
     32.Mitchell, T. R. ,and Kalb, L. S.
     1982, rEffects of Job Experience on Supervisor
     Attributions for a Subordinate`s Poor
     PerformanceJ , Journal of Appl ied Psychology,
     67, pp.181-188.
     33.Murphy, K. R., Garcia;M., Kerkar,S., Martin,C. ,&
     Balzer,W. K.
     1982, rRelationship Between Observational Acuuracy
     and Accuracy in Evaluting PerformanceJ
     , Journal of Appl ied Psycholgy,67,
     pp.320-325.
     34.Nanry, C.
     1988, rperformance Linked TraingJ ,Publ ic Personnel
     Management,17(4),pp.457-463.
     35.Padgett, M. Y. ,and lIgen, D. R.
     1989, `The Impact of Ratee Performance Characteristics
     on Rater Cognitive Processes
     and Alternative Measures of Rater AccuracYJ
     , Organizational Behavior and Human
     Decision Processes,44,pp.232-260.
     36.Peck, A. C.
     1984, `Pay and Performance: The Interaction of
     Compensation and Performance AppraisalJ ,
     Research Bulletin, No.155, New York
     Conference Board.
     37.Pulakos, E. D.
     1984, `A Comparison of Rater Training Programs:
     Error TrainingJ , Journal of Applied
     Psychology,69, 581-588.
     38.Pulakos, E. D.
     1986, `The Development of Training Programs to
     Increase Accuracy with Different Rating
     TasksJ ,Organizational Behavior and Human
     Decision Process,38,76-91.
     39.Pulakos, E.D.
     1991, `Behavioral Performance MeasuresJ In
     Applying Psychology In Business, Edited
     by J. M. Jones, B. O. Steffy, D. W. Bray,
     Mass. :Lexington Books,pp.307-313.
     40.Rose, G. L.
     1978, rSex Effects on Effort Attrbutions In
     Managerial Performance EvaluationJ ,Organizational
     Behavior and Human Performance
     ,21,pp.367-378.
     41.Sauser, W. L. ,and Pond, S. B.
     1981, rEffects of Rater Training and Participation
     on Cognitive ComplexitYJ , Personnel
     Psychology, 34,pp.609-626.
     42.Schmitt, N.,and Hill, T.
     1977, rSex and Race Composition of Assessment
     Center Groups as a Determinant of Peer
     and Assessor RatingsJ ,Journal of Applied
     Psychology,62,pp.261-264.
     43.Schmitt, N., and Lappin, M.
     1980, rRace and Sex as Determinants of the Mean
     and Variance of Performance RatingsJ ,
     Journal of Applied Psychology,65,pp.
     428-435.
     44.Schwab, D. P. ,and Heneman, H. G.
     1978, rAge Stereotyping in Performance AppraisalJ,
     Journal of Applied Psychology,
     63,pp.573-578.
     45.Shaw, D. G. ,Schneier,C. E. ,and Beatty, R. W.
     1991, rManaging Performance with A Behaviorally
     Based Apprasal systemJ ,in Applying Psychology
     In Business, Edited by J. M.
     Jones, B. O. Steffy, and D. W. Bray,
     Mass. :Lexington Books,pp.314-325.
     46.S10an, S. ,and Johnson, A. C.
     1968, r New Context of Personnel Appraisal J ,
     Harvard Business Review, Vol .46 No.6 Nov.
     IDoc,pp.226-230
     47.Smith, P. C. ,and Kendall, L. M.
     1963, rRetranslation of Expectations: An Approach
     to the Construction of Unambiguous
     Anchors for Rating ScalesJ ,Journal of
     Applied Psychology, 47,pp.149-155.
     48.Smith, D. E.
     1986, rTraining Programs for Performance Appraisal:
     A ReviewJ , Academy of Management
     Review,ll(l), pp.22-40.
     49.Wright, P.
     1974, rThe Harassed decision Maker: Time Pressures,
     Distractions and the Use of EdvidenceJ,
     Journal of Applied Psychology,
     59,555-561.
     50.Zalesny, M. D. ,and Highhouse, S.
     1992, r Accuracy in Performance EvaluationsJ ,
     Organizational Behaviorand Human Decision
     Processes,51, pp .22-50.
     51 .Zedeck, S. ,and Cascio, W. F.
     1982, rperformance Appraisal Decision as a
     Function of Rater Training and Purpose of
     the AppraisalJ , Journal of Applied Psycbology,
     67,pp.752-758.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政學系
G796605
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004012
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 孫本初zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor SUN,BEN CHUen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 姜慶芸zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) CHIANG,CHIN YUNen_US
dc.creator (作者) 姜慶芸zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) CHIANG, CHIN YUNen_US
dc.date (日期) 1993en_US
dc.date.accessioned 29-Apr-2016 16:35:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 29-Apr-2016 16:35:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Apr-2016 16:35:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002004012en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/88808-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 公共行政學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) G796605zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 績效考評是人力資源管理的重要課題，正確且有效的績效考評制度具有激zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒1
      第一節 研究動機與目的﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒1
      第二節 研究方法與限制﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒3
      第三節 研究範圍﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒6
      第四節 績效考評的意義與目的﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒8
     第二章 理論基礎與相關文獻探討﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒15
      第一節 績效考評的基礎與途徑﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒16
      第二節 績效考評的執行與回饋﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒36
      第三節 績效考評的過程模式﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒45
      第四節 績效考評的相關實證研究﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒57
     第三章 研究架構、假設、工具﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒65
      第一節 研究架構與假設﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒65
      第二節 研究變向操作化定義之發展與問卷之測試﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒69
      第三節 抽樣設計﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒79
     第四章 結果分析與討論﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒81
      第一節 樣本資料分析﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒81
      第二節 研究問題的結果分析﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒90
      第三節 討論﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒108
     第五章 結論與建議﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒115
      第一節 結論﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒115
      第二節 建議﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒121
     參考書目﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒127
     附錄
     本研究問卷		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004012en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 績效考評zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) PERFORMANCE APPRAISALen_US
dc.title (題名) 組織中人員績效考評運作之研究-績效考評模式之實證調查與分析zh_TW
dc.title (題名) THE STUDY OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN ORGANIZATIONen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. 王志剛譯， Gary Dessl er 著，管理學導論，台北:華泰書
     局，民國七十二年初版。
     2 許演松，人事行政，台北:華視文化出版社，民國七十六
     年初版(a) 。
     3. 陳國嘉，如何績效考核，台北:遠流出版公司，民國八十
     年初版。
     4. 張潤書，行政學，台北:三民書局，民國七十六年再增訂
     再版。
     5. 張潤書編譯，組織行為與管理，台北:五南圖書出版公司，
     民國七十四年再版。
     6. 殷文俊主持，當前行政機關公務人員士氣之研究，台北:
     行政院研究發展考核委員會編印，民國七十四年。
     7. 黃英忠，現代人力資源管理，台北:華泰書局，民國七十
     八年初版。
     8 鄭耀本，日本人事勞務管理，台北:書泉出版社，民國七
     十九年初版。
     9. 謝安田，人事管理，民國七十七年，台北:自印，五版。
     10. 傅肅良，考銓制度，台北:三民書局，民國七十六年，
     三修訂初版。
     11. 繆全吉、彭錦鵬、顧慕晴及蔡良文等編著，人事行政，
     台北:國立空中大學印行，民國七十九年修正再版。
     12. 蔡承志等譯，羅賓森原著，組織行為，台北:桂冠圖書
     公司，民國七十六年再版。
     中文期刊
     1. 林榮欽，「績效評估在人事管理上的運用」，人事月刊，
     第28 卷第1 期，頁4-14 0
     2. 施能傑「考績謬誤的類型與原因:理論闡述與經驗分析
     (上)、(下) 」，人事月刊，第14 卷第3.4期，民國八
     十一年三、四月，頁4 -12;頁4-16 。
     3. 許濱松，「改進考績激勵士氣」 行政管理論文選輯，第
     二輯，考試院銓敘部編印」，民國七十六年(b) ，頁247-279。
     4. 蔡正仁， 「 人事考核制度的改進」，人力資源經理雜誌，
     第二期，民國八十年八月，頁71-74 。
     5. 華力進， 「 政治行為研究途徑」，國立政治大學學報，第
     十二期，民國五十四年十二月，頁340-366。
     6 羅淑蕙，「一個有效考績模型的揭示一如何使考績更為切
     實有效」 人事管理，第5 卷第5期，民國七十六年十一
     月，頁30 -33。
     學位論文
     1. 丁立平，我國現行公務人員考績制度之研究，國立政治大
     學公共行政研究所，碩士論文，民國七十年六月。
     2. 卜正球，員工績效考評各面向之探討，國立政治大學公共
     行政研究所，碩士論文，民國七十八年一月。
     3. 朱金池，組織成員考核制度運作之研究，國立政治大學公
     共行政研究所，碩士論文，民國七十七年六月。
     4. 張翠娟，員工績效評估制度與功能之研究，國立臺灣大學
     政治研究所，碩士論文，民國八十年七月。
     
     
     
     I.Baird, L. S.,Schneier, C. E.,and Beatty, R. W.
     (ed. )
     1988, The Strategic Human Resource Management
     Sourcebook,Mass. :Human Resource Development
     Press.
     2.Bernardin, J. H. ,and Beatty, W. R.
     1984, Performance Appraisal :Assessing Human
     Behavior At Work, Mass. :Kent Publ ishing
     Co.
     3.Cascio, W. F. ,and Awad, E. M.
     1981, Human Resources Management,Virginia:Reston
     Publishing Co .
     4.Cummings, L. L. ,and Schwab, D. P.
     1973, Performance in Organization, III inois:
     Scott, Foresman Co.
     5.Dessler, G.
     1978, Personnel Management:Modern Concepts and
     Techniques,Virginia:Reston Publ ishing Co.
     6.Devries,D. L., Morrison,A. M. ,Shullman,S. L. ,and
     Gerlach,M. L.
     1981, Performance Appraisal on the Line, New
     York: John Wiley & Sons.
     7.Dyke, V. V.
     1960, Political Science: A Phi losophical
     Analysis, Standford: Standford University
     Press.
     S.Hall, D. T. and Goodale, J . G.
     1986, Human Resource Management, I I 1 inois
     Scott, Foresman Co.
     9.Hay, S. W. ,and Kearney, R. C. (ed.)
     1990, Public Personnel Administration, New
     Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.,(2nd ed.).
     10.Herriot, P. (ed.)
     1989, Assessment and Selection in Organizations,
     England:John Wi ley & Sons.
     II.Ivancevich, J. M., Szi lagyi, A. D. ,and Wallace
     Jr ., M. J.
     1977, Organizational Behavior And Performance,
     Ca. : Goodyear.
     12.Landy, F. J. ,and Farr, J . L.,
     1983, The Measurement of Work Performance:
     Methods, Theory and Applications,New
     York:Academic Press.
     13.Latham, G. P. ,and Wexley, K. N.
     1981, Increasing Productivity Through Performance
     Appraisal, Mass. :Addison-Wesley.
     14.Mohrman Jr. ,A. M., Resnick-West,S. M. ,and Lawler
     III,E. E.
     1989 Designing Performance Appraisal Systems,
     Ca. : J ossey- Bass Pub 1 i sher .
     IS.Morrisey, G. L.
     1983, Performance Appraisal In Business and
     Industry, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
     16.Schuler, S. R.
     1987, Personnel And Human Resource Management,
     3th Edition, West Publishing Co.
     17.Shneier, C. E., Beatty, R. W.,and Baird, L. S.
     ( ed . )
     1987, The Performance Management Sourcebook,
     Mass.: Human Resource Deve lopment Press.
     I8.Stone, T. H.
     1982, Understanding Personnel Management, New
     York: The Dryder Press.
     19.5wan, W. S.
     1991, How to Do a Superior Performance Appraisal,
     New York: John Wi ley & Sons.
     20.Szilagyi, A. D. Jr., Wallace, J. M. Jr.
     1987, Organizational Behavior & Performance,(4
     th ed.), Illinois: Scott, Foresman Co.
     英文期刊與文章
     1. Ash, R. A. ,and Levine, E. L.
     1980, r A Framework For Evaluating Job Analysis
     MethodsJ ,Personnel,57,pp.53-59.
     2. Bernardin, H. J.
     1978, rEffects of Rater Training on Leniency
     and Halo Errors in Student Ratings of
     InstructorsJ , Journal of Appl ied Psychology,
     63,pp.301-308.
     3. Borman, W. C.
     1978, rExploring Upper Limits of ReI iabi I ity
     and Validity in Job Performance RatingsJ ,
     Journal of Applied Phychology,63,pp.
     135-144.
     4. Borman, W. C.
     1979, rFormat and Training Effects on Rating
     Accuracy and Rater ErrorsJ , Journal od
     Appl ied Psychology, 64,pp.410-421.
     5. Borman, W. C. ,White, L. A. ,Pulakos, E. D.land
     Oppler, S. H.
     1991, rModel of Supervisory Job Performance
     RatingsJ , Journal of Appl ied Psychology,
     76,pp.863-872.
     6. Carlyle, J. J. ,and Ellison, F. T.
     1987, rDeveloping Performance StandardsJ In
     The Performance Management Source Book,
     Edited By E. C. Schneier, W. R. Beatty,
     and S. L. Bair, Human Resource Development
     Press,pp.76-78 .
     7. Cederblom, D.
     1987, rThe Performance Appraisal Interview: A
     Review, Implication and suggestionJ , in
     The Performance Management Source Book,
     Edited by E. C. Schneier, N. R. Beatty,
     S. L. Ba i rd, Mass.: Human Resources Development
     Press,pp.134-141.
     8. Cleveland, J. N. ,and Landy, F. J.
     1981, rThe Influence of Rater and Ratee Age on
     Two Performance JudgementsJ ,Journal of
     Personnel Psychology,34,pp.19-29.
     9. Cleveland, J. N.,Murphy, K. R.,and Williams, R.
     E.
     1989, rMultiple Uses of Performance Appraisal:
     Prevalence and CorrelatesJ , Journal of
     Applied Psychology, 74,pp.130-l35.
     lO.Daley, D.
     1983, rperformance Appraisal as a Guide for
     Training and Development:A Research Note
     on the Iowa Performance Evaluation SystemJ ,
     Public Personnel Management Journal,12(2),
     pp.159-l66.
     11.DeCotiis, T. A.,and Petit, A.
     1978, rThe Performance Appraisal Process: A
     Model and Some Testable PropositionsJ ,
     Academy of Management Review,3(3),635-64
     5.
     12.DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T. P.,and Meglino, B. M.
     1984, rA Cognitive View of Performance Appraisl
     Process: A Model and Research Propositions,
     Organizational Behavior and Human
     Performance,33, pp.360-369.
     13 . DeN i s i, A. S., and Will i ams, K. J.
     1988, rCognitive Approaches to Performance AppraisalJ,
     in K. M. Rowland and G. R.
     Ferris(eds.),Research in Personnel and
     Human Resource Management, vo 1.6, Greenwich,
     CT:JAI,pp.109-155.
     14.Dipboye, R. L. ,Arvey, R. D. ,and Terpstra, D. E.
     1977, `Sex and Physical Attractivenes of Raters
     and Applicants as Determinants of Resume
     EvaluationsJ ,Journal of Applied Psychology,
     62, pp.288-294.
     15.Dipboye, R. L.
     1985, `Some Neglected Variables In Research on
     Discrimination in AppraisalJ , Academy of
     Management Review,10(1),pp. 116-127.
     16.Doerflein, S.
     1985, `Directions for Career PlanningJ ,in The
     Performance Management Source-Book,
     Edited by E. C. Schneier, N. R. Beatty,
     S. L. Baird, Mass. :Human Resources Development
     Press,pp . 189-196.
     17.Dulewicz V. ,and Fletcher C.
     1989, `The Context and Dynamics of Performance
     AppraisalJ in Assessment and Selection in
     Organization, Edited by P. Herriot, England:
     John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
     18.Feldman, J . M.
     1981, `Beyond Attribution Theory: Cognitive
     Processes in Performance AppraisalJ ,
     Journal of Appl ied Psychology, 66, pp.
     127-148.
     19.Fomburn, C. J. ,and Laud, R. L.
     1983, r Strategic Issues in Performance Appraisal
     : Theory and PracticeJ , Personnel,
     60,Nov.IDec.pp.23-31
     20.Fox, S. ,and Dinner, Y.
     1988, rValidity of Self-Assessment: A Field
     EvaluationJ ,Personnel Psychology,41,pp.
     581-592.
     21.Funder, D. C.
     1987, rErrors and Mistakes: Evaluating the Accuracy
     of Social JudgementJ ,Psychological
     Bulletin, 101,pp.75-90.
     22.Herbert, G. R. ,and Doverspike, Dennis
     1990, rperformance Appraisal in the Training
     Need Analysis Process: A Review and CritiqueJ,
     Public Personnel Management,19
     (3),pp.253-269.
     23.Hoffman, C. C., Natham B. R. ,and Holden, L. M.
     1991, rA Comparison of Validation Criteria:Objective
     Versus Subjective Performance
     Measures and Self Versus Supervisor RatingsJ
     ,Personnel Psychology,44,pp.601-619
     24.Jacobs, R. ,and Kozlowski, S. W.
     1985, r A Closer Look at Halo Error in Perfor-
     mance RatingsJ , Academy of Management
     Journal,28, pp.201-212.
     25.Kingstrom, P. O. ,and Mainstone, L. E.
     1985, `Investigation of Rater-Ratee ACQuaintance
     and Rater BiasJ , Academy of Management
     Journal,28,pp.641-653.
     26.Klein, H. J., Snell, A. S.,and Wexley, N. K.
     1987, `Systems Model of the Performance Appraisal
     Interview ProcessJ , Industrial
     Relations, 26,pp.267-280
     27.Knowlton Jr., W. A., and Mitchell, T. R.
     1980, `Effects of Causal Attributions on Supervisor`s
     Evaluation of Subordinate
     PerformanceJ ,Journal of ApRI ied Psychology,
     65,pp.459-466 .
     28.Lovrich Jr., N. P.
     1990, rperformance Appraisal J , In S. W. Hays
     and R. C. Kearney (2nd ed.) Publ ic Personnel
     Administration, New Jersey: Prentice-
     Hall Inc., pp.91-103.
     29.Mai-Dalton, R. R.,Feldman-Summers, S.,and
     Mitchell,T. R.
     1979, rEffect of Employee Gender and Behavioral
     Style on the Evaluations of Male and Fe-
     male Banking Executives, Journal of AppI
     ied Psychology,64,pp.221-226.
     30.Meyer, H. H., Kay, E. ,and French Jr., P.
     1965, rSplit Roles in Performance AppraisalJ ,
     Harvard Business Reveiw, 43(1), pp.
     123-129.
     31.Meyer, H. H.
     1991, r A Solution to the Performance appraisal
     feedback enigmaJ , Academy of Management
     Executives, 5(1),pp.68-76.
     32.Mitchell, T. R. ,and Kalb, L. S.
     1982, rEffects of Job Experience on Supervisor
     Attributions for a Subordinate`s Poor
     PerformanceJ , Journal of Appl ied Psychology,
     67, pp.181-188.
     33.Murphy, K. R., Garcia;M., Kerkar,S., Martin,C. ,&
     Balzer,W. K.
     1982, rRelationship Between Observational Acuuracy
     and Accuracy in Evaluting PerformanceJ
     , Journal of Appl ied Psycholgy,67,
     pp.320-325.
     34.Nanry, C.
     1988, rperformance Linked TraingJ ,Publ ic Personnel
     Management,17(4),pp.457-463.
     35.Padgett, M. Y. ,and lIgen, D. R.
     1989, `The Impact of Ratee Performance Characteristics
     on Rater Cognitive Processes
     and Alternative Measures of Rater AccuracYJ
     , Organizational Behavior and Human
     Decision Processes,44,pp.232-260.
     36.Peck, A. C.
     1984, `Pay and Performance: The Interaction of
     Compensation and Performance AppraisalJ ,
     Research Bulletin, No.155, New York
     Conference Board.
     37.Pulakos, E. D.
     1984, `A Comparison of Rater Training Programs:
     Error TrainingJ , Journal of Applied
     Psychology,69, 581-588.
     38.Pulakos, E. D.
     1986, `The Development of Training Programs to
     Increase Accuracy with Different Rating
     TasksJ ,Organizational Behavior and Human
     Decision Process,38,76-91.
     39.Pulakos, E.D.
     1991, `Behavioral Performance MeasuresJ In
     Applying Psychology In Business, Edited
     by J. M. Jones, B. O. Steffy, D. W. Bray,
     Mass. :Lexington Books,pp.307-313.
     40.Rose, G. L.
     1978, rSex Effects on Effort Attrbutions In
     Managerial Performance EvaluationJ ,Organizational
     Behavior and Human Performance
     ,21,pp.367-378.
     41.Sauser, W. L. ,and Pond, S. B.
     1981, rEffects of Rater Training and Participation
     on Cognitive ComplexitYJ , Personnel
     Psychology, 34,pp.609-626.
     42.Schmitt, N.,and Hill, T.
     1977, rSex and Race Composition of Assessment
     Center Groups as a Determinant of Peer
     and Assessor RatingsJ ,Journal of Applied
     Psychology,62,pp.261-264.
     43.Schmitt, N., and Lappin, M.
     1980, rRace and Sex as Determinants of the Mean
     and Variance of Performance RatingsJ ,
     Journal of Applied Psychology,65,pp.
     428-435.
     44.Schwab, D. P. ,and Heneman, H. G.
     1978, rAge Stereotyping in Performance AppraisalJ,
     Journal of Applied Psychology,
     63,pp.573-578.
     45.Shaw, D. G. ,Schneier,C. E. ,and Beatty, R. W.
     1991, rManaging Performance with A Behaviorally
     Based Apprasal systemJ ,in Applying Psychology
     In Business, Edited by J. M.
     Jones, B. O. Steffy, and D. W. Bray,
     Mass. :Lexington Books,pp.314-325.
     46.S10an, S. ,and Johnson, A. C.
     1968, r New Context of Personnel Appraisal J ,
     Harvard Business Review, Vol .46 No.6 Nov.
     IDoc,pp.226-230
     47.Smith, P. C. ,and Kendall, L. M.
     1963, rRetranslation of Expectations: An Approach
     to the Construction of Unambiguous
     Anchors for Rating ScalesJ ,Journal of
     Applied Psychology, 47,pp.149-155.
     48.Smith, D. E.
     1986, rTraining Programs for Performance Appraisal:
     A ReviewJ , Academy of Management
     Review,ll(l), pp.22-40.
     49.Wright, P.
     1974, rThe Harassed decision Maker: Time Pressures,
     Distractions and the Use of EdvidenceJ,
     Journal of Applied Psychology,
     59,555-561.
     50.Zalesny, M. D. ,and Highhouse, S.
     1992, r Accuracy in Performance EvaluationsJ ,
     Organizational Behaviorand Human Decision
     Processes,51, pp .22-50.
     51 .Zedeck, S. ,and Cascio, W. F.
     1982, rperformance Appraisal Decision as a
     Function of Rater Training and Purpose of
     the AppraisalJ , Journal of Applied Psycbology,
     67,pp.752-758.		zh_TW