Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 過度自信的研究:問題、困難度、抽樣方式與線索有效性對過度自信的影響。 作者 彭兆禎 貢獻者 顏乃欣
彭兆禎關鍵詞 過度自信
問題
困難度
抽樣方式
線索日期 1993 上傳時間 29-Apr-2016 16:40:15 (UTC+8) 摘要 有關主觀機率判斷的心理學研究發現,人們判斷的品質通常並不佳,而普 參考文獻 Adam, J. K. ,&Adams, P.A.(1961).Realism of confidence judgments. Psycholoical Review,68,33-45.\r\nAdam,P.A. ,&Adams,J.K.(1958). Training in confidence judgments. American Journal of Psychology,1985,71,747-751.\r\nAllwood, C. M. ,&Montgomery,H.(1987). Response selection strategies and realism of confidence judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proce-sses,39,365-383.\r\nArkes,H. R. , Christensen,C. , Lai,C., &Blumer,C.(1987). Two methods of reducing overconfidence. Organi-zational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,39,133-144.\r\n\r\nAxel,C. S. ,&Holstein,S.(1972). Probabilistic forecasting : An experiment related to the stock market. Organ-izational Behavior and Human Performance,8,139-158.\r\nBrier,G. W.(1950). Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability.Monthly Weather Review,75,1-3.\r\nBrown,T. A. ,&Shufors,E. H. (1973). Quantifying uncertainty into numerical probabilities for the reporting of intelligence(Report R-1185-ARPA). Santa Monica: The RAND Corp.\r\nBrunswik,E.(1943). Qrganismic achievement and environ-mental prabability.The Psychological Review,50,255-272.\r\nBrunswik,E.(1964). Scope and as pects of the cognitive problem. In Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp.4-31). Cambrige,MA: Harvard University Press.\r\nBrunswik,E.(1955). Symposium on the probability approch in psychology: Representative design and probabilis-tic theory in a functional psychology.Psychological Review,62,193-217.\r\nChoo,G.T.G(1976).Training and generalization in asse-ssment probabilities for Organisation and Social Studies.\r\nDawes,R. M, (1980). Confidence in intellectual judgmentsvs. Confidence in perceptual judgments. In: E. D. Lant-ermann and H. Feger(Eds.),Similarity and cholice. Vienna: Hans Huber.\r\nEinhorn,H. ,&Hogarth,R.M.(1978). Confidence in judgment : Persistence of the illusion of validity.Psychologi-cal review,85,395-416.\r\nFischhoff,B.(1982). Debiasing. In D.Kahneman,P.Slovic,& A. Tversky(Eds.),Judgment under uncertainty : Heu-ristics and biases(pp.422-444). New York: Cambrige University. Press.\r\nFischhoff,B. ,Slovic,P.(1980). A little learning...: Confidence in multicue judgment. In R. Nickers on (Ed.),Attention and Performance VI II.Hillsdale, N. J.:Erlbaum.\r\nFischhoff,B., Slovic,p.,&Lichtenstein,S.(1977).Know-ing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology,3,552-564.\r\nGigerenzer,G.,Hoffrage, U.,&Kleinbolting,H.(1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psycological Review,48,506-528.\r\nGriffin,D. G. ,&Tversky,A.(1992). The weighting of e-vidence and the determinants of confidence. Cog-nitive Psychology,24,411-435.\r\nKahneman,D. ,&Tversky, A.(1972). Subjective probablity: A judgment of representativeness. Cogntive Psy-chology, 3,430-454.\r\nKahneman,D. ,&Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review,80,237-251.\r\n\r\nKeren,G.(1987). Facing uncertainty in the game of bridge: A calibration study. Organizeational Be-havior and Human Decision Processes,39,98-114.\r\nKeren,G.(1988). On the ability of monitoring non-veridical perceptions and uncertain knoweledge:Some calibration studies. Acta Psychologica,67,95-119.\r\nKoriat, A., Lichtenstein, S.,&Fischhoff,B.(1980). Rea-sons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psy-chology: Human Learning and Memory,6,107-118.\r\nLa Rochefoucauld,F.(1959). The maxims of La Rochefou-cauld(L. Kronenberger. Trans.). New York: Random House.\r\nLi chtenstein,S.,&Fischhoff,B.(1977).Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?. Or-ganizational Behavior and Human Performance,20,159-183.\r\nLi chtenstein,S.,&Fischhoff,B.(1980a). How well do pro-bability experts assess probability?(Decision re-search of Report 80-5). Eugent, Oreg.:Decision Re-search.\r\nLi chtenstein,S.,&Fischoff,B.(1980b). Training for cal-ibration. Organizational Behavior and Human Perfor-mance,26,149-171.\r\nLi chtenstein,S.,&Fischhoff,B.(1981). The effects of gender and instructions on calibration(Decision Research Report 81-5). Eugent, Oreg.: Decision Re-search.\r\nLi chtenstein,S.,&Fischhoff,B.&Phillips,L.D.(1982). Calibration of probability: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman,P. Slovic,&A. Tversty(Eds.),Judg-ment under uncertainty: Heuristics and bias(pp. 306-334). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\r\nMayseless,O.,&Kruglanski, A. W.(1987). What makes your so sure?Effects of epistemic motivation on judgmental confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Deci-sion Process,39,162-183.\r\nMurphy,A.H.(1973). A new vector partition of the pro-bability score. Journal of Applied Meteorology,12,595-600.\r\nMurphy,A.H.,&Winkler, R.L.(1971). Forecasters and pro-bability forecasts: some current problem. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Socity,52,239-247.\r\nOskamp,S.(1962). How clinicians make decisions from MMPI : An empirical study. Paper presented at the American Psychology Association, St. Louis. \r\nOskamp,S.(1965). Overconfidence in case-studey judgments. The Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 261-265.\r\nPhillips,L.D.,&Edward,W. (1966). Conservatism in a simple probability inference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology,72,345-354.\r\nPitz,G.F.(1974). Subjective probability distribution for imperfectly knwo quantities. In L. W. Gregg(Ed.),Know-ledge and cognition. New York: Wiley.\r\n\r\nReed,S.K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categoriza-tion. Cognitive Psychology,3,382-407.\r\nRonis, D. L. , &Yetes,J.F.(1987). Components of probabi-lity judgment accuracy: Individual consistency and effects of subject matter and assessment method. Organizational Behavior and Decision Pro-cesses,40,193-218.\r\nSieber,J.E.(1974). Effects of decision importance on ability to generate warranted subjective uncer-tainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psycho-logy,30,688-694.\r\nSlovic,P.(1972). From Shakespeare to Simon: Specula-tions-and some evidence-about man’s ability to process information. Oregon Research Institute Monography,12,2.\r\nTaylor,S.E.,&Brown,J.D.(1988). Illusion and well-being :A social psychology perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin,103,193-210.\r\nTversky,A.,&Kahneman,D.(1973). Availability: a heuri-stic for judging frequencey and probability. Cog-nitive Psychology,5,207-232.\r\nTversky, A.,&Kahneman,D.(1974). Judgment under uncer-tainy: Heuristic and Biases. Science,185,1124-1131.\r\nWright,G.(1982). Changes in the realism and distribu-tion of probability assessments as a function of question type. Acta Psychologica,52,165-174.\r\nWright,G.,&Phillips,L.D.(1976). Personality and proba-bilistic thinking: An experimental study(Tech. Rep. 76-3). Uxbrige, England: Brunel Institute of Organisa-tional and Social Studies. \r\nWright,G.,Phillips,L.D.,Whalley,P.C.,Choo,G.T.T.,Ng, K.o.,Tan,I.,&Wisudha,A.(1978). Culture differences in probabilistic thinking. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology,9,285-299.\r\nWright, G. N. ,&Wisudha, A.(1982).Distributionof proba-bility assessments for almanac and future event questions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,23,219-224.\r\nYates,J.F.(1990). Judgment and Decision Making. Engle-wood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall.\r\nYates,J.F.,Lee,J.W.,Shinotsuka,H.,Yen,N.S.,Singh,R.,Onglatco, M.L.U.,Gupta,M.,&Bhatnagar,D.(1991). The origins of Asian versus Western difference in pro-bability judgment accuracy patterns. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Social for Judgment and Decision Making. San Francisco, CA, U. S. A. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
心理學系
795910資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004026 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 顏乃欣 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 彭兆禎 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 彭兆禎 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 1993 en_US dc.date.accessioned 29-Apr-2016 16:40:15 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 29-Apr-2016 16:40:15 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Apr-2016 16:40:15 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002004026 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=100810 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 心理學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 795910 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 有關主觀機率判斷的心理學研究發現,人們判斷的品質通常並不佳,而普 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒1\r\n第一節 文獻探討﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒4\r\n第二節 研究問題﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒46\r\n\r\n第二章 實驗一﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒47\r\n第一節 研究方法﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒48\r\n第二節 結果﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒56\r\n第三節 討論﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒64\r\n\r\n第三章 實驗二﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒66\r\n第一節 研究方法﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒67\r\n第二節 結果﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒74\r\n第三節 討論﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒79\r\n\r\n第四章 實驗三﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒82\r\n第一節 研究方法﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒83\r\n第二節 結果﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒91\r\n第三節 討論﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒97\r\n\r\n第五章 綜合討論與建議﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒99\r\n第一節 綜合討論﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒99\r\n第二節 檢討與建議﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒106\r\n\r\n參考文獻﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒108\r\n\r\n附錄﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒115 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004026 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 過度自信 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 問題 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 困難度 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 抽樣方式 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 線索 zh_TW dc.title (題名) 過度自信的研究:問題、困難度、抽樣方式與線索有效性對過度自信的影響。 zh_TW dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Adam, J. K. ,&Adams, P.A.(1961).Realism of confidence judgments. Psycholoical Review,68,33-45.\r\nAdam,P.A. ,&Adams,J.K.(1958). Training in confidence judgments. American Journal of Psychology,1985,71,747-751.\r\nAllwood, C. M. ,&Montgomery,H.(1987). Response selection strategies and realism of confidence judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proce-sses,39,365-383.\r\nArkes,H. R. , Christensen,C. , Lai,C., &Blumer,C.(1987). Two methods of reducing overconfidence. Organi-zational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,39,133-144.\r\n\r\nAxel,C. S. ,&Holstein,S.(1972). Probabilistic forecasting : An experiment related to the stock market. Organ-izational Behavior and Human Performance,8,139-158.\r\nBrier,G. W.(1950). Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability.Monthly Weather Review,75,1-3.\r\nBrown,T. A. ,&Shufors,E. H. (1973). Quantifying uncertainty into numerical probabilities for the reporting of intelligence(Report R-1185-ARPA). Santa Monica: The RAND Corp.\r\nBrunswik,E.(1943). Qrganismic achievement and environ-mental prabability.The Psychological Review,50,255-272.\r\nBrunswik,E.(1964). Scope and as pects of the cognitive problem. In Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp.4-31). Cambrige,MA: Harvard University Press.\r\nBrunswik,E.(1955). Symposium on the probability approch in psychology: Representative design and probabilis-tic theory in a functional psychology.Psychological Review,62,193-217.\r\nChoo,G.T.G(1976).Training and generalization in asse-ssment probabilities for Organisation and Social Studies.\r\nDawes,R. M, (1980). Confidence in intellectual judgmentsvs. Confidence in perceptual judgments. In: E. D. Lant-ermann and H. Feger(Eds.),Similarity and cholice. Vienna: Hans Huber.\r\nEinhorn,H. ,&Hogarth,R.M.(1978). Confidence in judgment : Persistence of the illusion of validity.Psychologi-cal review,85,395-416.\r\nFischhoff,B.(1982). Debiasing. In D.Kahneman,P.Slovic,& A. Tversky(Eds.),Judgment under uncertainty : Heu-ristics and biases(pp.422-444). New York: Cambrige University. Press.\r\nFischhoff,B. ,Slovic,P.(1980). A little learning...: Confidence in multicue judgment. In R. Nickers on (Ed.),Attention and Performance VI II.Hillsdale, N. J.:Erlbaum.\r\nFischhoff,B., Slovic,p.,&Lichtenstein,S.(1977).Know-ing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology,3,552-564.\r\nGigerenzer,G.,Hoffrage, U.,&Kleinbolting,H.(1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psycological Review,48,506-528.\r\nGriffin,D. G. ,&Tversky,A.(1992). The weighting of e-vidence and the determinants of confidence. Cog-nitive Psychology,24,411-435.\r\nKahneman,D. ,&Tversky, A.(1972). Subjective probablity: A judgment of representativeness. Cogntive Psy-chology, 3,430-454.\r\nKahneman,D. ,&Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review,80,237-251.\r\n\r\nKeren,G.(1987). Facing uncertainty in the game of bridge: A calibration study. Organizeational Be-havior and Human Decision Processes,39,98-114.\r\nKeren,G.(1988). On the ability of monitoring non-veridical perceptions and uncertain knoweledge:Some calibration studies. Acta Psychologica,67,95-119.\r\nKoriat, A., Lichtenstein, S.,&Fischhoff,B.(1980). Rea-sons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psy-chology: Human Learning and Memory,6,107-118.\r\nLa Rochefoucauld,F.(1959). The maxims of La Rochefou-cauld(L. Kronenberger. Trans.). New York: Random House.\r\nLi chtenstein,S.,&Fischhoff,B.(1977).Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?. Or-ganizational Behavior and Human Performance,20,159-183.\r\nLi chtenstein,S.,&Fischhoff,B.(1980a). How well do pro-bability experts assess probability?(Decision re-search of Report 80-5). Eugent, Oreg.:Decision Re-search.\r\nLi chtenstein,S.,&Fischoff,B.(1980b). Training for cal-ibration. Organizational Behavior and Human Perfor-mance,26,149-171.\r\nLi chtenstein,S.,&Fischhoff,B.(1981). The effects of gender and instructions on calibration(Decision Research Report 81-5). Eugent, Oreg.: Decision Re-search.\r\nLi chtenstein,S.,&Fischhoff,B.&Phillips,L.D.(1982). Calibration of probability: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman,P. Slovic,&A. Tversty(Eds.),Judg-ment under uncertainty: Heuristics and bias(pp. 306-334). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\r\nMayseless,O.,&Kruglanski, A. W.(1987). What makes your so sure?Effects of epistemic motivation on judgmental confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Deci-sion Process,39,162-183.\r\nMurphy,A.H.(1973). A new vector partition of the pro-bability score. Journal of Applied Meteorology,12,595-600.\r\nMurphy,A.H.,&Winkler, R.L.(1971). Forecasters and pro-bability forecasts: some current problem. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Socity,52,239-247.\r\nOskamp,S.(1962). How clinicians make decisions from MMPI : An empirical study. Paper presented at the American Psychology Association, St. Louis. \r\nOskamp,S.(1965). Overconfidence in case-studey judgments. The Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 261-265.\r\nPhillips,L.D.,&Edward,W. (1966). Conservatism in a simple probability inference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology,72,345-354.\r\nPitz,G.F.(1974). Subjective probability distribution for imperfectly knwo quantities. In L. W. Gregg(Ed.),Know-ledge and cognition. New York: Wiley.\r\n\r\nReed,S.K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categoriza-tion. Cognitive Psychology,3,382-407.\r\nRonis, D. L. , &Yetes,J.F.(1987). Components of probabi-lity judgment accuracy: Individual consistency and effects of subject matter and assessment method. Organizational Behavior and Decision Pro-cesses,40,193-218.\r\nSieber,J.E.(1974). Effects of decision importance on ability to generate warranted subjective uncer-tainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psycho-logy,30,688-694.\r\nSlovic,P.(1972). From Shakespeare to Simon: Specula-tions-and some evidence-about man’s ability to process information. Oregon Research Institute Monography,12,2.\r\nTaylor,S.E.,&Brown,J.D.(1988). Illusion and well-being :A social psychology perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin,103,193-210.\r\nTversky,A.,&Kahneman,D.(1973). Availability: a heuri-stic for judging frequencey and probability. Cog-nitive Psychology,5,207-232.\r\nTversky, A.,&Kahneman,D.(1974). Judgment under uncer-tainy: Heuristic and Biases. Science,185,1124-1131.\r\nWright,G.(1982). Changes in the realism and distribu-tion of probability assessments as a function of question type. Acta Psychologica,52,165-174.\r\nWright,G.,&Phillips,L.D.(1976). Personality and proba-bilistic thinking: An experimental study(Tech. Rep. 76-3). Uxbrige, England: Brunel Institute of Organisa-tional and Social Studies. \r\nWright,G.,Phillips,L.D.,Whalley,P.C.,Choo,G.T.T.,Ng, K.o.,Tan,I.,&Wisudha,A.(1978). Culture differences in probabilistic thinking. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology,9,285-299.\r\nWright, G. N. ,&Wisudha, A.(1982).Distributionof proba-bility assessments for almanac and future event questions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,23,219-224.\r\nYates,J.F.(1990). Judgment and Decision Making. Engle-wood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall.\r\nYates,J.F.,Lee,J.W.,Shinotsuka,H.,Yen,N.S.,Singh,R.,Onglatco, M.L.U.,Gupta,M.,&Bhatnagar,D.(1991). The origins of Asian versus Western difference in pro-bability judgment accuracy patterns. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Social for Judgment and Decision Making. San Francisco, CA, U. S. A. zh_TW
