學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 翻譯的不確定性:其論證及有效性
The Indeterminacy of Translation: It`s Arguments and Validity作者 侯維之
Hou, Wei-Tzu貢獻者 方萬全
Fang, Wan-Chuan
侯維之
Hou, Wei-Tzu關鍵詞 根本翻譯
刺激意義
觀察語句
分析假說
不確定性理論
不可限定理論
radical translation
stimulus meaning
observation sentence日期 1993 上傳時間 29-Apr-2016 16:41:52 (UTC+8) 摘要 蒯因(W.V. quine)在語言哲學的發展上 , 可說是當代一大重鎮. 他對傳 參考文獻 1. 方萬全，1991，〈第一人稱與翻譯的不確定說〉，《分析哲學與語言哲學論文集》，香港，中文大學(排印中)。 2. ───，1987，〈戴維森的意義理論與語意現象的解釋〉，《美國研究》六月，台北，中研院歐美所，頁1~35。 3. 涂紀亮(編譯)，1986，《語言哲學名著選讀》，北京，三聯。 4. 陳中人(譯)，1990，《從邏輯的觀點看》(原稿為W.V. Quine, Form a Logical Point of View)，台北，結構群。 5. 黃宣範，1983，《語言哲學》，台北，文鶴。 1.Bohnert, Herbert G. “Quine on Analyticity,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A.Sch-lipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.49-72. 2.Boorse, Christopher “The Origins of the Indeterminacy Thesis.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975):PP.369-387. 3.Carnap, Rudolf “Semantics, Empiricism, and Ontology.” Revue Intern-ationale de Philosophie 11(1950): PP.208-228. 4.Chomsky, Noam “Quine’s Empirical Assumptions,” in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (ed.), Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W.V. Quine(Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1969)PP. 53-68 5.Davidson, Donald “Radical Interpretation,” Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation(New York, Oxford, 1984)PP.125-141. 6.────”Truth and Meaning,” Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation(New York, Orford, 1984)PP.17-36. 7.Field, Hatry “Tarski’s Theory of Truth.” Journal of Philosopy 69(1972)PP.347-375. 8.Follesal, Dagfinn “Essentialism and Reference,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.97-113. 9.────”indeterminacy and Mental States,” in R.B. Barrett and R.F. Gibson(ed.), Perspectives on Quine(Cambridge,Mass.:Basil Blackwell, 1990)PP.98-109. 10.────”Indeterminacy of Translation and Underdetermina-tion for the Theory of Nature.” Dialectica 27(1973) PP.289-301. 11.Frege, Gottlob “On Sense and Meaning,” in B. McGuinness(ed.), Col-lected Papers on Mathmatics, Logic, and Philosophy(Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell, 1984)PP.157-177. 12.Gemes, Ken “The Indeterminacy Thesis Reformulated.” Journal of Philosophy88 (1991)PP.91-108. 13.Gibson, Roger F., Jr. “Indeterminacy, Underdetermination, and Facts of the Matter,” Enlightened Empiricism(Tampa, Florida: Univer-sity of South Florida, 1988)PP.102-131. 14.Grice, Paul and Peter F. Strawson “In Defense of a Dogma,” in James F. Harris, Jr. and Richard H. Severens (ed.), Analyicity (Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books, 1970)PP.54-74. 15.Grice, Paul “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation,” Studies in the Way of Words(Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University, 1989) PP.41-57. 16.Harman, Gilbert “Quine’s Grammar,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V.Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.165-180. 17.Hookway, Christopher Quine: Language, Experience and Reality (Oxford, New York: Polity, 1988). 18.Jaggar, Alison “On One of the Reasons for the Indeterminacy of Translation.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34(1973), PP.257-265. 19.Kirk, Robert Translation Determined(Oxford, New York: Clanendon, 1986). 20.Nozick, Robert “Experience, Theory, and Language,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. QUine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.339-363. 21.Putnam, Hilary “Meaning Holism,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)pp. 405-426. 22.────”Is Semantics Possible?” in H.E.Kieferand M.K.Munitz (ed.), Language, Belief, and Metaphysics(Albay: State Univer-sity of New York, 1970) pp.50-63. 23.────”The Refutation of Conventionalism,” Mind, Language and Reality(London: Cambridge University, 1975). 24.Quine, Willard van Orman “Comment on Follesdal, “in R.B. Barrett and R.F. Gibson (ed.), Perspectives on Quine(Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell, 1990)P.110. 25.────”Comment on Stroud,” in R.B. Barrett and R.F. Gibson (ed.), Perspectives on Quine (Cambridge, Mass: Basil Blackwell, 1990)PP.334-335. 26.────”Five Milestones of Empiricism,” in Theories and Things(Cambridge, Mass.: Havard niversity, 1981)PP.67-72. 27.────”On Empirically Equivalent System of the World.” Erkenntnis9(1975)PP.313-328. 28.────”On the Reasons for the Indeterminacy of Translation.” Journal of Philosophy67(1970)PP.178-183. 29.────Ontological Relativity and Other Essays(New York: Columbia Univesity,1969). 30.────”On What There Is,” in From a Logical Point of View 2d.(Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University, 1980)PP.1-19. 31.────”Relativism and Absolutism.” Monist67(1984)PP.293-296. 32.────”Reply to Dagfinn Follesdal,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.114-116. 33.────”Reply to Gilbert Harman,” in L.E. Hahn and P. A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open court, 1986)PP.181=188. 34.────”Reply to Herbert G. Bohnert.” In L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosoply of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open court, 1986)PP.93-96. 35.────”Reply to Hilary Putnam,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.427-432. 36.────”Reply to Paul A. Roth,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.459-462. 37.────”Reply to Robert Nozick,” in L.E. Hahn and P. A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.364-368. 38.────”Reply to Roger F. Gibson, Jr.,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Sall e, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.155-158. 39.────”Things and Their Place in Theories,” in Theories and Things (Cambridge, Mass. : Havard University,1981)PP.1~23. 40.────”Two Dogmas of Empiricism” in From a Logi-cal Point of View 2d, (Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University, 1980)PP. 20-46. 41.────Word and Object(Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 1960). 42.Rorty, Richard “Indeterminacy of Translation and of Truth”, Synthese 23(1972) PP.443-462. 43.Roth, Paul “Semantics without Foundations,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court. 1986)PP.433-458. 44.Stroud, Barry “Quine’s Physicalism,” in R.B. Barrett and R.F. Gibson (ed.), Perspectives on Quine(Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell,1990)PP.321-333. 45.White, Morton G. “Analytic and Synthetic: an Untenable Dualism,” in J. F. Harris and R. H. Severens(ed.), Analyticity(Chicago, IL: Quad-rangle Books, 1970)PP.75-91. 46.Zabludowski, Andrzej “On Ouine’s Indeterminacy Doctrine.” Philosophical Review98(1989)PP.35-63. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
哲學系
G795707資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004130 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 方萬全 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Fang, Wan-Chuan en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 侯維之 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hou, Wei-Tzu en_US dc.creator (作者) 侯維之 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Hou, Wei-Tzu en_US dc.date (日期) 1993 en_US dc.date.accessioned 29-Apr-2016 16:41:52 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 29-Apr-2016 16:41:52 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Apr-2016 16:41:52 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002004130 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/88970 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 哲學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) G795707 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 蒯因(W.V. quine)在語言哲學的發展上 , 可說是當代一大重鎮. 他對傳 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 前言‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧IV第一章 翻譯的不確定性釋義‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧1 第一節 根本翻譯與刺激意義‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧1 1.1.1 根本翻譯‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧1 1.1.2 刺激意義‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧3 第二節 語句的分類與翻譯的關係‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧8 1.2.1 情境語句語翻譯的關係‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧9 1.2.2 觀察語句‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧11 第三節 邏輯連詞的翻譯‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧15 第四節 同義句與分析句‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧18 1.4.1 內在主體的刺激同義句‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧19 1.4.2 語詞的同義‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧22 1.4.3 不可測度說‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧27 1.4.4 同義句與分析句‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧30 第五節 分析假說‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧36 第二章 經驗論的兩個獨斷與不確定說的關係‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧44 第一節 經驗論的兩個獨斷‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧44 2.1.1 分析與綜合命題的區分‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧44 2.1.2 同義性可以用來說明分析性嗎? ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧47 2.1.3 語意規則‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧51 2.1.4 意義的證實說和還原論‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧54 2.1.5 沒有獨斷的徹底經驗論‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧57 第二節 不可限定說的說明‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧60 2.2.1 不可限定說‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧60 2.2.2 不可限定說與不確定說的關係‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧63 第三節 整體論的說明‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧66 2.3.1 整體論與皮爾士原則‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧66 2.3.2 整體論與不確定說‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧69 第三章 誤解與反駁‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧75 第一節 誤解的典型‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧75 3.1.1 瑟爾的意見‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧75 3.1.2 基摩斯的意見‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧79 第二節 蒯因是一個證時說與還原論者嗎? ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧82 3.2.1 嘉格的意見‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧82 3.2.2 布爾斯的意見‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧87 第三節 不可限定說與整體論說明是否成立?‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧92 3.3.1 瓊斯基的批評‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧93 3.3.2 羅悌的批評‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧94 3.3.3 弗希達的批評‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧96 3.3.4 布爾斯的批評‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧98 第四節 相容或不相容的翻譯手冊‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧103 第四章 進一步的討論‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧111 第一節 刺激意義、觀察語句、皮爾士原則－－證實說與還原論的殘餘? ‧111 第二節 整體論與不可限定說‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧115 4.2.1 分析─綜合陳述與整體論‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧115 4.2.2 整體論與不可限定說‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧117 第三節 整體論與不可測度說‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧119 4.3.1 整體論與不可測度說的關係‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧119 4.3.2 不可測度說是否適用於第一人稱? ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧121 結語‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧134 參考文獻‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧137 縮寫表‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧143 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004130 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 根本翻譯 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 刺激意義 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 觀察語句 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 分析假說 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 不確定性理論 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 不可限定理論 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) radical translation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) stimulus meaning en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) observation sentence en_US dc.title (題名) 翻譯的不確定性:其論證及有效性 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Indeterminacy of Translation: It`s Arguments and Validity en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. 方萬全，1991，〈第一人稱與翻譯的不確定說〉，《分析哲學與語言哲學論文集》，香港，中文大學(排印中)。 2. ───，1987，〈戴維森的意義理論與語意現象的解釋〉，《美國研究》六月，台北，中研院歐美所，頁1~35。 3. 涂紀亮(編譯)，1986，《語言哲學名著選讀》，北京，三聯。 4. 陳中人(譯)，1990，《從邏輯的觀點看》(原稿為W.V. Quine, Form a Logical Point of View)，台北，結構群。 5. 黃宣範，1983，《語言哲學》，台北，文鶴。 1.Bohnert, Herbert G. “Quine on Analyticity,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A.Sch-lipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.49-72. 2.Boorse, Christopher “The Origins of the Indeterminacy Thesis.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975):PP.369-387. 3.Carnap, Rudolf “Semantics, Empiricism, and Ontology.” Revue Intern-ationale de Philosophie 11(1950): PP.208-228. 4.Chomsky, Noam “Quine’s Empirical Assumptions,” in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (ed.), Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W.V. Quine(Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1969)PP. 53-68 5.Davidson, Donald “Radical Interpretation,” Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation(New York, Oxford, 1984)PP.125-141. 6.────”Truth and Meaning,” Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation(New York, Orford, 1984)PP.17-36. 7.Field, Hatry “Tarski’s Theory of Truth.” Journal of Philosopy 69(1972)PP.347-375. 8.Follesal, Dagfinn “Essentialism and Reference,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.97-113. 9.────”indeterminacy and Mental States,” in R.B. Barrett and R.F. Gibson(ed.), Perspectives on Quine(Cambridge,Mass.:Basil Blackwell, 1990)PP.98-109. 10.────”Indeterminacy of Translation and Underdetermina-tion for the Theory of Nature.” Dialectica 27(1973) PP.289-301. 11.Frege, Gottlob “On Sense and Meaning,” in B. McGuinness(ed.), Col-lected Papers on Mathmatics, Logic, and Philosophy(Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell, 1984)PP.157-177. 12.Gemes, Ken “The Indeterminacy Thesis Reformulated.” Journal of Philosophy88 (1991)PP.91-108. 13.Gibson, Roger F., Jr. “Indeterminacy, Underdetermination, and Facts of the Matter,” Enlightened Empiricism(Tampa, Florida: Univer-sity of South Florida, 1988)PP.102-131. 14.Grice, Paul and Peter F. Strawson “In Defense of a Dogma,” in James F. Harris, Jr. and Richard H. Severens (ed.), Analyicity (Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books, 1970)PP.54-74. 15.Grice, Paul “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation,” Studies in the Way of Words(Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University, 1989) PP.41-57. 16.Harman, Gilbert “Quine’s Grammar,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V.Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.165-180. 17.Hookway, Christopher Quine: Language, Experience and Reality (Oxford, New York: Polity, 1988). 18.Jaggar, Alison “On One of the Reasons for the Indeterminacy of Translation.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34(1973), PP.257-265. 19.Kirk, Robert Translation Determined(Oxford, New York: Clanendon, 1986). 20.Nozick, Robert “Experience, Theory, and Language,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. QUine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.339-363. 21.Putnam, Hilary “Meaning Holism,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)pp. 405-426. 22.────”Is Semantics Possible?” in H.E.Kieferand M.K.Munitz (ed.), Language, Belief, and Metaphysics(Albay: State Univer-sity of New York, 1970) pp.50-63. 23.────”The Refutation of Conventionalism,” Mind, Language and Reality(London: Cambridge University, 1975). 24.Quine, Willard van Orman “Comment on Follesdal, “in R.B. Barrett and R.F. Gibson (ed.), Perspectives on Quine(Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell, 1990)P.110. 25.────”Comment on Stroud,” in R.B. Barrett and R.F. Gibson (ed.), Perspectives on Quine (Cambridge, Mass: Basil Blackwell, 1990)PP.334-335. 26.────”Five Milestones of Empiricism,” in Theories and Things(Cambridge, Mass.: Havard niversity, 1981)PP.67-72. 27.────”On Empirically Equivalent System of the World.” Erkenntnis9(1975)PP.313-328. 28.────”On the Reasons for the Indeterminacy of Translation.” Journal of Philosophy67(1970)PP.178-183. 29.────Ontological Relativity and Other Essays(New York: Columbia Univesity,1969). 30.────”On What There Is,” in From a Logical Point of View 2d.(Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University, 1980)PP.1-19. 31.────”Relativism and Absolutism.” Monist67(1984)PP.293-296. 32.────”Reply to Dagfinn Follesdal,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.114-116. 33.────”Reply to Gilbert Harman,” in L.E. Hahn and P. A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open court, 1986)PP.181=188. 34.────”Reply to Herbert G. Bohnert.” In L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosoply of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open court, 1986)PP.93-96. 35.────”Reply to Hilary Putnam,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.427-432. 36.────”Reply to Paul A. Roth,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.459-462. 37.────”Reply to Robert Nozick,” in L.E. Hahn and P. A. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.364-368. 38.────”Reply to Roger F. Gibson, Jr.,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Sall e, IL: Open Court, 1986)PP.155-158. 39.────”Things and Their Place in Theories,” in Theories and Things (Cambridge, Mass. : Havard University,1981)PP.1~23. 40.────”Two Dogmas of Empiricism” in From a Logi-cal Point of View 2d, (Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University, 1980)PP. 20-46. 41.────Word and Object(Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 1960). 42.Rorty, Richard “Indeterminacy of Translation and of Truth”, Synthese 23(1972) PP.443-462. 43.Roth, Paul “Semantics without Foundations,” in L.E. Hahn and P.A. Schlipp(ed), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine(La Salle, IL: Open Court. 1986)PP.433-458. 44.Stroud, Barry “Quine’s Physicalism,” in R.B. Barrett and R.F. Gibson (ed.), Perspectives on Quine(Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell,1990)PP.321-333. 45.White, Morton G. “Analytic and Synthetic: an Untenable Dualism,” in J. F. Harris and R. H. Severens(ed.), Analyticity(Chicago, IL: Quad-rangle Books, 1970)PP.75-91. 46.Zabludowski, Andrzej “On Ouine’s Indeterminacy Doctrine.” Philosophical Review98(1989)PP.35-63. zh_TW
