1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 在公司中人際親疏關係對公平判斷之影響
作者 蔡文青
CAI, WEN-QING
貢獻者 林邦傑
蔡文青
CAI, WEN-QING
日期 1992
1991
上傳時間 2-May-2016 15:21:10 (UTC+8)
摘要 摘要
參考文獻 參考書目
     中文部分
     林邦傑(民8 0) 。 我國學生與教師社會性公道之研究國科會補助論文。
     林邦傑(民8 1) 。 不同年齡的青少年所知覺的不公平情境及其預期後果。國科會補助論文。
     黃光國(民7 6) 。 人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲。 楊國樞:中國人的心理。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
     黃光國(民7 8) 。 儒家思想中的正義觀。 揚國樞:中國人的心理與行為。 台北:桂冠圖書公司。
     
     英文部分
     Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice In organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No.2, 177-198.
     Ambrose, M. L., Harland, L. K., & Kulik, C. T. (1991). Influence of social comparisons on perceptions of organizational fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 76, No.2, 239-246.
     Austin, W. (1980). Friendship and fairness: Effects of type of relationship and task performance on choice of distribution rules. Personality and Social Psychology
     Bulletin, Vol. 6, No.3, 402-408.
     Austin, W., & Tobiasen, J. (1982). Moral evaluation in intimate relationships. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen(Eds.), Equity and justice In soical behavior, New York: Academic press
     Barrett, E. J., & Lamm, H. (1989). The role of procedural justice in the allocation of limited resources: A west German perspective. Social Justice Research, Vol. 3,
     No.1, 21-30.
     Barrett?Howard. E., & Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion In allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50, No.2, ? 296-304.
     Chlu, C. (1990). Normative expectations of social behavior and concern for members of the collective in Chinese socity. The Journal of Psychology, 124(1), 103-111.
     Chiu, C. (1991). Role expectation as the principal criterion in justice judgement among Hong Kong Chinese students. The Journal of Psychology, 125(5), 557-565.
     Cohen, R. L. (1985). Procedural justice and participation. Human Relations, Vol, 38, No.7, 643-663.
     Cohen, R. L. (1987). Destributive Justice: Theory and research. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, 19-39.
     Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 31, No.3, 137?149 .
     Earley, P. C. & Lind, E. A. (1987). Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52, No.6, 1148-1160.
     Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and Improvement on experienced inequity. Journal . of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 35, No.2, 108-119.
     Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory, A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds). Justice in social relations. New York. Plenum Press.
     Folger, R. (1987). Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No.2, 143-159.
     Folger, R., & Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531-546.
     Folger, R., Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, Iss, 1, Mar, 115-130.
     Furby, L. (1986). Psychology and justice. In R. L. Cohen (Ed) Justice: Views from the social science. New York: Plenum Press.
     Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 71, No. 2, 340-342.
     Greenberg, J. (1987). Reaction to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 172, No. 1, 55-61
     Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (1982). Why justice ? Normative and instrumental interpretations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.) Equity and justice behavior, New York: Academic Press.
     Hui, C. H., Triandls, H. C., & Yee, C. (1991). Cultural differences In reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation? British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 145-157.
     Hwang, K. K. (1990). Modernalization of the Chinese family business. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 593?618.
     Krebs, D. (1982). Prosocial behavior, equity, and jus tice. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds) Equity and justice behavior, New York: Academic Press.
     Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. H.
     Willis (Eds) Social Exchange, Advances in Theory and Research, New York: Plenum Press.
     Lind, B. A. & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The generality of procedural justice. In B. A. Lind & T. R. Tyler (Eds.) The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press
     Lind, B. A. & Tyler, T. R. (1988). Procedural justice in law 2, Sources and implications of procedural justice judgements. In B. A. Lind & T. R. Tyler (Eds.) The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
     Lind, E. A., Kafer, R., & Earley, (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice instrumental and noninstrumental concersn in fairness judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50, No.2, 296?304.
     Mikula, G. (1984). Justice and fairness in interpersonal relations: Thought and suggestions. In H. Tajfel(Ed.) The social dimension: European developments in social
     psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Mikula, G. (1986). The experience of Injustice: Toward a better understanding of its phenomenology. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds). Justice in social relations. New York: Plenum Press.
     Miller, M. L. (1989). Process and decision control in the work place: Separate effects, independence from distributive justice, and tests of explanatory mechanisms. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(4), 337-354.
     Stake, J. E. (1983). Factors in reward distribution: Allocator motive, gender, and protestant ethic dndoresement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 44, NO.2, 410-418.
     Tyler, T. R. (1986). When does procedural justice matter in organizational settings? Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1, 7-23.
     Tyler, T. R. (1986). The psychology of leadership evaluation. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds). Justice in social relations. New York:? Plenum Press.
     Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgements of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vo1.52, No.2, 333-344.
     Tyler, T. R. (1987). Procedural Justice Research. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No.1, 41-65.
     Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 57, No.5, 830-838.
     Zajac, . E. E. (1985). Perceived economic justice: The example of public utility regulation. In H. P. Young (Ed) Cost allocation: methods principle, applications. 119-153.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
心理學系
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004423
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林邦傑zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蔡文青zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) CAI, WEN-QINGen_US
dc.creator (作者) 蔡文青zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) CAI, WEN-QINGen_US
dc.date (日期) 1992en_US
dc.date (日期) 1991en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-May-2016 15:21:10 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-May-2016 15:21:10 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-May-2016 15:21:10 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002004423en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89336-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 心理學系zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 摘要zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 目錄
     第一章 緒論--------------------1
     第一節 研究動機--------------------1
     第二節 影響公平判斷的因素--------------------2
     第三節 研究目的--------------------7
     第四節 重要名詞詮釋--------------------8
     第二章 文獻探討及研究假設--------------------9
     第一節 分配公平--------------------10
     第二節 程序公平--------------------16
     第三節 整體公平感--------------------23
     第四節 研究假設--------------------27
     第三章 研究方法--------------------31
     第四章 分析結果--------------------36
     第五章 討論與建議--------------------56
     第一節 結果討論--------------------56
     第二節 研究限制與建議--------------------60
     參考書目--------------------63
     附錄一 問卷中的故事內容--------------------68
     附錄二 問卷中的問題部分--------------------79
     附錄三 問卷--------------------81		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004423en_US
dc.title (題名) 在公司中人際親疏關係對公平判斷之影響zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 參考書目
     中文部分
     林邦傑(民8 0) 。 我國學生與教師社會性公道之研究國科會補助論文。
     林邦傑(民8 1) 。 不同年齡的青少年所知覺的不公平情境及其預期後果。國科會補助論文。
     黃光國(民7 6) 。 人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲。 楊國樞:中國人的心理。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
     黃光國(民7 8) 。 儒家思想中的正義觀。 揚國樞:中國人的心理與行為。 台北:桂冠圖書公司。
     
     英文部分
     Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice In organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No.2, 177-198.
     Ambrose, M. L., Harland, L. K., & Kulik, C. T. (1991). Influence of social comparisons on perceptions of organizational fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 76, No.2, 239-246.
     Austin, W. (1980). Friendship and fairness: Effects of type of relationship and task performance on choice of distribution rules. Personality and Social Psychology
     Bulletin, Vol. 6, No.3, 402-408.
     Austin, W., & Tobiasen, J. (1982). Moral evaluation in intimate relationships. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen(Eds.), Equity and justice In soical behavior, New York: Academic press
     Barrett, E. J., & Lamm, H. (1989). The role of procedural justice in the allocation of limited resources: A west German perspective. Social Justice Research, Vol. 3,
     No.1, 21-30.
     Barrett?Howard. E., & Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion In allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50, No.2, ? 296-304.
     Chlu, C. (1990). Normative expectations of social behavior and concern for members of the collective in Chinese socity. The Journal of Psychology, 124(1), 103-111.
     Chiu, C. (1991). Role expectation as the principal criterion in justice judgement among Hong Kong Chinese students. The Journal of Psychology, 125(5), 557-565.
     Cohen, R. L. (1985). Procedural justice and participation. Human Relations, Vol, 38, No.7, 643-663.
     Cohen, R. L. (1987). Destributive Justice: Theory and research. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, 19-39.
     Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 31, No.3, 137?149 .
     Earley, P. C. & Lind, E. A. (1987). Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52, No.6, 1148-1160.
     Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and Improvement on experienced inequity. Journal . of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 35, No.2, 108-119.
     Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory, A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds). Justice in social relations. New York. Plenum Press.
     Folger, R. (1987). Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No.2, 143-159.
     Folger, R., & Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531-546.
     Folger, R., Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, Iss, 1, Mar, 115-130.
     Furby, L. (1986). Psychology and justice. In R. L. Cohen (Ed) Justice: Views from the social science. New York: Plenum Press.
     Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 71, No. 2, 340-342.
     Greenberg, J. (1987). Reaction to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 172, No. 1, 55-61
     Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (1982). Why justice ? Normative and instrumental interpretations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.) Equity and justice behavior, New York: Academic Press.
     Hui, C. H., Triandls, H. C., & Yee, C. (1991). Cultural differences In reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation? British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 145-157.
     Hwang, K. K. (1990). Modernalization of the Chinese family business. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 593?618.
     Krebs, D. (1982). Prosocial behavior, equity, and jus tice. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds) Equity and justice behavior, New York: Academic Press.
     Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. H.
     Willis (Eds) Social Exchange, Advances in Theory and Research, New York: Plenum Press.
     Lind, B. A. & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The generality of procedural justice. In B. A. Lind & T. R. Tyler (Eds.) The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press
     Lind, B. A. & Tyler, T. R. (1988). Procedural justice in law 2, Sources and implications of procedural justice judgements. In B. A. Lind & T. R. Tyler (Eds.) The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
     Lind, E. A., Kafer, R., & Earley, (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice instrumental and noninstrumental concersn in fairness judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50, No.2, 296?304.
     Mikula, G. (1984). Justice and fairness in interpersonal relations: Thought and suggestions. In H. Tajfel(Ed.) The social dimension: European developments in social
     psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Mikula, G. (1986). The experience of Injustice: Toward a better understanding of its phenomenology. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds). Justice in social relations. New York: Plenum Press.
     Miller, M. L. (1989). Process and decision control in the work place: Separate effects, independence from distributive justice, and tests of explanatory mechanisms. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(4), 337-354.
     Stake, J. E. (1983). Factors in reward distribution: Allocator motive, gender, and protestant ethic dndoresement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 44, NO.2, 410-418.
     Tyler, T. R. (1986). When does procedural justice matter in organizational settings? Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1, 7-23.
     Tyler, T. R. (1986). The psychology of leadership evaluation. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds). Justice in social relations. New York:? Plenum Press.
     Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgements of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vo1.52, No.2, 333-344.
     Tyler, T. R. (1987). Procedural Justice Research. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No.1, 41-65.
     Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 57, No.5, 830-838.
     Zajac, . E. E. (1985). Perceived economic justice: The example of public utility regulation. In H. P. Young (Ed) Cost allocation: methods principle, applications. 119-153.		zh_TW