1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 美國公共部門勞動關係之研究--兼論我國未來相關法制之展望
作者 丘周剛
QIU, ZHOU-GANG
貢獻者 趙守博
ZHAO, SHOU-BO
丘周剛
QIU, ZHOU-GANG
關鍵詞 勞動關係
公共部門
日期 1992
上傳時間 2-May-2016 15:24:54 (UTC+8)
參考文獻 壹、書籍（依姓氏筆劃為序）
     一、史尚寬，「勞動法原論」（正大印書館，民國六十七年）
     二、吳定，「公共政策分析架構」（天一圖書公司印行，民國七十四年九月）
     三、吳全成，「我國勞資爭實體法制與個案之研究」（民國八十年四月）
     四、林紀東，「中華民國憲法逐條釋義（四）」（三民書局，民國七十年三月初版）
     五、趙守博，「法制與革新」（幼獅文化事業公司，民國七十五年一月三版）
     六、黃越欽，「勞動法論」（國立政治大學勞工研究所，民國八十年九月）
     貳、官方出版品
     一、各國勞資關係（調整）法彙編（行政院勞工委員會，民國七十九年三月）
     二、吳庚等，「公務員基準法之研究」（行政院研究發展考核委員會，民國七十九年四月）
     三、公會法修正有關參考法規資料（行政院勞工委員會編印，民國七十九年十一月）
     四、工會法修正草案（立法院議案關係文書，民國七十九年十一月二十八日）
     五、勞資處理法修正草案（立法院議關係文書，民國八十年六月二十七日）
     六、「考試院統計提要」（考試院秘書處編印，民國八十年七月）
     七、司法院公報第三十三卷第十期（民國八十年十月）
     八、行政院人事行政局第一處，「公務員協會組織與運作之研究」（民國八十一年二月，未出版）。
     九、黃越欽主持，「公營事業勞動關係立法之比較研究」（行政院勞工委員會出版，民國八十一年五月）。
     參、論著
     一、丘周剛，「美國公共部門受雇罷工權之探討」（美國月刊，民國八十一年六月）
     二、丘周剛，「罷工與替代罷工者～微視美國勞工法規範」（法學叢刊，民國八十一年七月號）
     三、林明鏘，「憲政改革與公物元制度」（法令月刊第四十三卷第一期）
     四、趙守博，「健全勞動法制的方向與重點」（民國七九年十一月）
     五、趙守博，「當前勞工行政的目標與工作重點」（勞弓形證第三十九期，民國八十年七月一日）
     六、焦興鎧，「美國勞工法對私立大專院校教授組織公會之不當限制」美國研究第十九卷第一期（民國七十八年三月）。
     七、焦興鎧，「美國法上不當解僱之概念及其救濟之道」，美國研究第十八卷第二期（民國七十七年六月）
     八、顏良恭，「民營化與美國的公共行政」（美國月刊第六十六期，民國八十年十月）
     九、蔡震榮，「從德、日兩國特別權利關係理論探討我國當前特別權力關係應發展之方向」警政學報第十四期，民國七十七年）
     十、黃越欽，「從勞動鬥爭權到和諧義務」（政大法學評論第三十九期民國七十八年六月）
     肆、譯著
     一、丘周剛譯，「勞資爭議：罷工及閉廠之法律」法學論叢第一四二期，民國八十年四月）
     二、丘周剛譯，「公營企業職員罷工立法與公眾安全訴求：英、日法制之比較研究」（勞工行政第四十一、四十二期，民國八十年九月、十月）
     三、彭錦鵬譯，「公務員工會有損民主政治？」（收於「憲政思潮」第八十二其之「工部門公會的集體談判是否損及民主政治？」）
     伍、報紙
     一、中國時報（民國八十一年一月四日第六版）
     二、經濟日報（民國八十一年一月二十二日第二版）
     三、自立晚報（民國八十一年一月二十七日第三版）
     四、聯合報（民國八十一年一月三日第四版）
     （二）英文部分
     一、英文書籍
     1.Aaron,B.,Grodin,J.&Stern,J.,Public-Sector Bargaining(Washington: Bureau of National Affairs, 1979).
     2.Atleson,J.,Values and Assumptions in American Labor Law(1983).
     3.Bent,A.E.&ReevesT.Z.,Collective Bargaining in the Public Sector: Labor Management Relation and Public Policy (1978).
     4.Blum,A.A.et.al. White-Collar Workers,(New York: Random. House,1971).
     5.Boehm,R. & Heldnan,O., Public Employees, Unions and the Erosion of Civil Trust:A Case Study of San Francisco in the 1970`s(1982).
     6.BOK,A.C.O.&GORMAN,R.,Cases And Materials On Labor Law( 9th 1981).
     7.Chamberl in, N.&Kuhn, J. "Collective Bargaining" C2d ed.1965).
     8.Gorman,R.,Basic Text on Labor Law: Unionization and Collective Bargaining (1976),
     9.Hanslowe,K.,The Emerging Law of Labor Relations in Public Employment (lthaca,N.Y.: ILR Press,1967).
     10.Hogler,R.,Public Sector Strikes: Employee Rights, Union Responsibilities and Employer Prerogative(International Personnel Management Association,1988).
     11.Marx,H.L.Jr.,Bargaining for Public Employees, (New York: H. W. Wilson, 1969).
     12.IL0, Freedom of Association and Procedureres for staff participation in determining conditions of employment in the public service, Report 1 ,Joint Committee on the Public Service, First Session,(Geneva 1971).
     13. ---,Freedom of Association and Procedureres for Determining Conditions of Employment in the Public Service, Geneva(976)
     14.---, Conditions of work and employment in water, gas and electricity supply service,(Geneva,1982).
     15.Juris H. A. and Peter ,F, Police Unionism: Power and Impact in Public-Sector Bargaining(Lexington, Mass. :D. C. Heath and Co.,1973).
     16.Kochan,T.,Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations" (Homewood, Ill. :Richard O.lrwin,1980).
     17.Koehan,T.,et al.,Dispute Resolution under Fact-finding and Arbitration(New York: American Arbitration Ass`N.1979).
     18.Kolb,D.,The Mediators(Cambridge:M1T Press,1983).
     19.Lipset,S.,Unions in Transition: Entering the Second Century (San Francisco: ICS Press, 1986).
     20.Rhyne, C.Labor Unions and Municiple Employee Law(Washington, D. C., 1946).
     21.Schick,R.&Couturier,J.,The Public Interest In Government Labor Relations(1977).
     22.Siwkin,W.,"Hedaition and the Dynamics of Collective Bargaining(Washington: Bureau of National Affairs,1971).
     23.Voslloo,W.8.,Collective Bargaining in the United States Federal Civil Service(Chicago: Public Personnel Administration,1966).
     24.Weiler,P."Public Unionism and Public Finances .(1979)
     二、英文期刊
     1.Alstyne,"`Cracks`in The New Property :Adjudicative Due Process in the Administrative State",62 CORNELL L.REV.(1977).
     2.Anderson,Mac Donald & O`Reill, "Impasse Resolution in Public Sector Collective Bargaining-An Examination of Compulsory Interest Arbitration in New York,51 St.John`s L.Rev.(1977)
     3.Baird, "On Strikers and Their Replacements "Government Union Review Vol.12 N.3 SUII.(991).
     4.Birk,"Industrial Conflict: The Law of Strikes and Lock-Outs at Comparative Labor Law and Industrial Relations,1987 p.402.
     5.Burton,"Public Sector Unionism: An Economic Perspective" Government Union Review Vol.3 Nr.2 Spring (1982).
     6.Burton&Krider, "The Role and Consequences of Strikes by Public Employees,79 Yale L.J.(1970).
     7.Michael Cole, "Public Employee Strikes: The Law and Possible Alternatives", The Cumberland Law Review Vol.11(1980)
     8.Conant,"Agency Problems in the Public Sector Labor Relation", Government Union Review Vol.10 Nr.3 (1989).
     9.Dripps,"New Directions for the Regulation of Public Employee Strikes ",New York University Law Review Vol.60(19S5).
     10. Edwards, "The Developing Labor Relations Law in the Public Sector",10 Duq. L.REV.(1972) o
     l1.-------,"The Emergining Duty to Bargain in the Public Sector, 71 MICH.L.REV.(l973).
     12.Estreicher, "Strikers and Replacements ",Labor Law Journal May(l987)
     13.Feuille, "Selected Benefits and Costs of Compulsory Arbitration", 33 INDUS.&LAB.REL.REV.(1972)`
     14.Freeman&Medoff,"The Two Faces of Unionism",57 PUB.INTEREST(1979).
     15.Gilllespie,The MacKay Doctrine and the Myth of Business Necessity, 50 TEX. L. Rev. (1972)
     16.Hampton, "Federal Labor - Hanage.ent Relations:(I. Program in Evoluation,21 CATH.U.L.REV.(1972).
     17.Hanslowe&Acierno, "The Law and Theory of Strikes by Government Ernployees" , 67 Cornell L. REV. (1982)
     18.Jennings,et al."Fact-finding in Perspective" Government Union Review Vo1.8 No.3 Summer (1987).
     19.Kuwahara,"Pulic Employee Strikes Demanding Their Legislation and Their Safety: A Comparative Study on Japanese and The U.S. Law", Hosei Riron Vol.13 (1981).
     20.Lieberman," Public Sector Bargaining: A Policy Reappraisal Government Union Review(1980).
     21.---------,"Binding Arbitration In Public Employment: A Reappraisal" Government Union Review Vol. l Nr.2 Spring(1980)
     22.--- - -----,"Academic Bias in Public Sector Labor Relation" Government Union Review Vol.3 Nr.3 Fall(1982).
     23.Love&Sulzner,"Political Implications of Public Employee Bargaining",2 INDU.REL. (972).
     24.Lynd, "Investment Decisions and the Quid Pro Quo Myth",29 CASE ~.RES. L.REV.(1979).
     25.Mann,"The Taylor Law: Strike Penality and Strikes",51 N.Y. ST.B.J. (979).
     26.McCann&Smile)`, "The National Labor Relations Act and the Regulation of Public Employee Collective Bargaining,13 Harv. J. on LEGIS. (976).
     27.Meltzer&Sunstein, "Public Employee Strikes, Executive Discretion, and the Air Traffic Controller"50 U.CHI.L.REV. (1983).
     28.Mitchell,"Public Sector Union Security: The Impact of Abood",29 LAB.L.J.(1978).
     29.Monaghan,Of"Liberity"and "Property",62 CORNELL L.REV.(1977) ?
     30.Nolan,"Public Employee Unionism in the Southeast: The Legal Parameters,29 S.C.L.REV. (978),
     31.Note,"Collective Bargaining and the Professional Employee, 69 COLUM. L. REV. (1969) .
     32.----,"Public Employee Bargaining In North Carolina: From Pateralism to Confusion,59 N.C.L.REV.(1980).
     33.----,"The Law and Theory of Strikes by Government Employees" Cornell Law Review Vol.67(1982).
     34.Olson,"The Us e of the Legal Right to Strike in the Public Sector",33 LAB.L.J.(1982).
     35.Podgers, "Public Sector Labor Dispute: A Balancing Act for Judges, 66 A.B.A.J.(1980)
     36.Reynolds, "Cause and Effect in Public Sector Unionism: An Economic Analysis”, Government Union Review Vol.4 Nr.l Winter(1983).
     37.Rosenblum 8. Steinbach, "Federal Employee Labor Relations :From the `Gag Rule` to Executive Order 11491",59 KY.L. J.(1971).
     ~8.Tim Schooley, "The Reinstatement Rights of Striking" Industrial Relations Law Journal Vol.9 No.2(1987).
     39.Schregle ,"Labour Relations in the Public Sector "at Comparative Labor Law and Industrial Relations ,513-516(1987)
     40.Seder, "Strikers` Reinstatement Rights" ,WI .L.REY. (1983).
     41.Smith,"State and Local Advisor? Reports on Public Employment Labor Legislations: A Comparative Analysis",67 MICH. L.REV.(969).
     42.-----"New Federal Employee Union Political Activism(Government Union Review Vol.4 Spring 1983).
     43.Summers, "Public Sector Collective Bargaining Substantially Diminishes Democracy" ,Government Union Review(19S0).
     44.Troy,"Public Sector Unionism: The Rising Power Center of Organized Labor" ,Government Union Review Yol.9 Nr.2 Spring (1988) .
     45. Weiler,"Striking a New Balance: Freedom of Contract and the Prospects for Union Representation,98 Harvard L.Rev.(1985)
     46.Weisenfeld,"Public Employees-First or Second Class Citizen? 16 Lab .L.J.(1965).
     47.Wellington and Winter, "The Limits of Collective Bargaining in Public Employment "The Yale Law Journal,Vol.78 Number 7, June 1969).
     48.Wilson,"The Replacement of Lawful Economic Strikers in the Public Sector in Ohio,"46 Ohio St. Law Journal(1985).
     49.Wollet,"The Bargaining Process in the Public Sector: What is Bargainable?" 51 OR.L.REV. (1971).
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
勞工研究所
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004660
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 趙守博zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor ZHAO, SHOU-BOen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 丘周剛zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) QIU, ZHOU-GANGen_US
dc.creator (作者) 丘周剛zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) QIU, ZHOU-GANGen_US
dc.date (日期) 1992en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-May-2016 15:24:54 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-May-2016 15:24:54 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-May-2016 15:24:54 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002004660en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89408-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 勞工研究所zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章、研究源起
     第一項、研究源起．．．．．．．．．．p.1~p.3
     第一項、研究範圍與方法．．．．．．．．．．p.3~p.4
     本章註釋．．．．．．．．．．p.5~p.5
     
     第貳章、何謂「公共部門」？
     第一節、定義之困難．．．．．．．．．．p.7~p.7
     第二節、公共部門雇傭之界定．．．．．．．．．．p.7 ~p.19
     壹、類型化之嘗試．．．．．．．．．．p.7~ p.9
     貳、公共部門勞動關係之當事人．．．．．．．．．．p.9~ p.11
     參、勞動關係之主要類型．．．．．．．．．．p.12~ p.18
     肆、本章結論．．．．．．．．．．p.18~ p.19
     本章註釋．．．．．．．．．．p.19~ p.19
     
     第參章、美國公共部門的勞動關係
     第一節、公共部門工會化之形成．．．．．．．．．．p.21~ p.60
     第一項、組織工會的難題．．．．．．．．．．p.21~ p.24
     第二項、公共部門工會化之形成．．．．．．．．．．p.24~ p.29
     第一款、發展前的歷史背景．．．．．．．．．．p.24~ p.27
     第二款、公共部門工會化之出現．．．．．．．．．．p.27~ p.29
     第三項、主要的工會組織．．．．．．．．．．p.30~ p.35
     第四項、公共部門工會化的檢討．．．．．．．．．．p.35~54
     第一款、權力核心的移轉．．．．．．．．．．p.35~ p.38
     第二款、反應公共部門工會化的主張．．．．．．．．．．p.38~54
     壹、工會價租追求模式理論．．．．．．．．．．p.38~ p.43
     貳、公共部門與私部門具不同特徵．．．．．．．．．．p.43~ p.47
     第三款、對工會安全條款制度的檢討．．．．．．．．．．p.47~ p.54
     壹、制定法之授權．．．．．．．．．．p.47~ p.49
     貳、憲法上之變數．．．．．．．．．．p.49~ p.54
     本章註釋．．．．．．．．．．p.54~ p.60
     第二節、公共部門之團體協商．．．．．．．．．．p.61~ p.91
     第一項、團體協商之介紹．．．．．．．．．．p.61~ p.64
     壹、團體協商之憲法法源．．．．．．．．．．p.62~ p.62
     貳、團體協商權之制定法規定．．．．．．．．．．p.63~ p.64
     第二項、團體協商之範圍．．．．．．．．．．p.64~ p.77
     壹、概論．．．．．．．．．．p.64~ p.66
     貳、公共部門雇傭中團體協商之範圍．．．．．．．．．．p.66~ p.77
     參、司法對於協商範圍之限制．．．．．．．．．．p.68~ p.77
     一、團體協商及管理權．．．．．．．．．．p.68~ p.71
     二、團體協商及公共政策．．．．．．．．．．p.71~ p.74
     三、最新見解：角色傾向．．．．．．．．．．p.74~ p.77
     第三項、政府義務的契約條款與片面修正．．．．．．．．．．p.77~ p.80
     第四項、本節結論．．．．．．．．．．p.80~ p.81
     本章註釋．．．．．．．．．．p.82~ p.91
     
     第肆章、爭議解決程序
     第一節、一般僵局解決程序－調解、事實調查與仲裁．．．．．．．．．．p.93~ p.109
     第一項、調解．．．．．．．．．．p.95~ p.98
     第二項、事實調查．．．．．．．．．．p.98~ p.105
     壹、事實調查的意義．．．．．．．．．．p.99~ p.99
     貳、評估事實調查效率的指標．．．．．．．．．．p.99~ p.100
     參、影響事實調查效率有關的因素．．．．．．．．．．p.100~ p.104
     肆、結語．．．．．．．．．．p.104~ p.105
     第三項、仲裁．．．．．．．．．．p.105~ p.107
     本章註釋．．．．．．．．．．p.107~ p.108
     第二節、公共部門受雇者罷工權．．．．．．．．．．p.109~ p.127
     第一項、公共部門受雇者罷工歷史．．．．．．．．．．p.110~ p.112
     第二項、聯邦與州之相關立法．．．．．．．．．．p.112~ p.118
     本章註釋．．．．．．．．．．p.119~ p.127
     第三節、有關公共部門罷工權之爭辯．．．．．．．．．．p.129~ p.149
     壹、反對公共部門受雇者具有罷工權之理由．．．．．．．．．．p.129~ p.135
     一、理論上的辯證．．．．．．．．．．p.129~ p.130
     二、經濟學上的分析．．．．．．．．．．p.130~ p.135
     貳、贊成公共部門受雇者具有罷工權之理由．．．．．．．．．．p.135~ p.141
     參、本節小結．．．．．．．．．．p.142~ p.145
     本章註釋．．．．．．．．．．p.146~ p.149
     第四節、罷工與替代罷工者．．．．．．．．．．p.151~ p.186
     第一項、私部門模式中罷工者之復職權．．．．．．．．．．p.152~ p.163
     壹、Mackay案作之區分理論．．．．．．．．．．p.153~ p.155
     貳、Mackay案作之影響．．．．．．．．．．p.155~ p.157
     參、對Mackay案作決之小評．．．．．．．．．．p.157~ p.158
     肆、Giddings &Lewis,Inc. v. NLRB 案所發展出的資歷制度．．．．．．．．．．p.157~ p.160
     伍、對Giddings &Lewis,Inc. v. NLRB 一案之評論．．．．．．．．．．p.160~ p.163
     第二項、公共部門罷工者之復職權．．．．．．．．．．p.163~ p.178
     壹、私部門先例可否應用於公共部門中？．．．．．．．．．．p.163~ p.167
     貳、對公共部門罷工受雇者復職權之建議．．．．．．．．．．p.167~ p.178
     第三項、結論．．．．．．．．．．p.178~ p.179
     本章註釋．．．．．．．．．．p.180~186
     
     第伍章、國公共部門之勞動關係
     第一節、我國的「公共部門」．．．．．．．．．．p.187~ p.187
     第二節、公共部門之勞動關係．．．．．．．．．．p.188~ p.203
     第一項、憲法所保障的勞動三權．．．．．．．．．．p.191~ p.192
     第二項、相關制定法之沿革．．．．．．．．．．p.192~ p.199
     第一款、工會法．．．．．．．．．．p.192~ p.193
     第二款、公務員相關法規．．．．．．．．．．p.194~ p.197
     第三款、對於公營事業勞工之規範．．．．．．．．．．p.197~ p.199
     第三項、全盤禁止下的檢討．．．．．．．．．．p.199~ p.203
     第三節、本章結論．．．．．．．．．．p.203~ p.204
     本章註釋．．．．．．．．．．p.205~209
     
     第陸章、研究發現與建議
     第一節、研究發現．．．．．．．．．．p.211~ p.212
     第二節、對目前政策上的建議．．．．．．．．．．p.211 ~ p.218
     第一項、公共部門勞動立法模式．．．．．．．．．．p.212~ p.213
     第二項、個別或通盤模式？．．．．．．．．．．p.213~214
     第三項、公共部門勞動立法的立法政策．．．．．．．．．．p.215~ p.218
     第三節、結語．．．．．．．．．．p.218 ~ p.218
     本章註釋．．．．．．．．．．p.219~ p.222
     參考書目(一)中文部分．．．．．．．．．．p.223~ p.225
     參考書目(二)英文部分．．．．．．．．．．p.226~ p.234		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004660en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 勞動關係zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公共部門zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 美國公共部門勞動關係之研究--兼論我國未來相關法制之展望zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、書籍（依姓氏筆劃為序）
     一、史尚寬，「勞動法原論」（正大印書館，民國六十七年）
     二、吳定，「公共政策分析架構」（天一圖書公司印行，民國七十四年九月）
     三、吳全成，「我國勞資爭實體法制與個案之研究」（民國八十年四月）
     四、林紀東，「中華民國憲法逐條釋義（四）」（三民書局，民國七十年三月初版）
     五、趙守博，「法制與革新」（幼獅文化事業公司，民國七十五年一月三版）
     六、黃越欽，「勞動法論」（國立政治大學勞工研究所，民國八十年九月）
     貳、官方出版品
     一、各國勞資關係（調整）法彙編（行政院勞工委員會，民國七十九年三月）
     二、吳庚等，「公務員基準法之研究」（行政院研究發展考核委員會，民國七十九年四月）
     三、公會法修正有關參考法規資料（行政院勞工委員會編印，民國七十九年十一月）
     四、工會法修正草案（立法院議案關係文書，民國七十九年十一月二十八日）
     五、勞資處理法修正草案（立法院議關係文書，民國八十年六月二十七日）
     六、「考試院統計提要」（考試院秘書處編印，民國八十年七月）
     七、司法院公報第三十三卷第十期（民國八十年十月）
     八、行政院人事行政局第一處，「公務員協會組織與運作之研究」（民國八十一年二月，未出版）。
     九、黃越欽主持，「公營事業勞動關係立法之比較研究」（行政院勞工委員會出版，民國八十一年五月）。
     參、論著
     一、丘周剛，「美國公共部門受雇罷工權之探討」（美國月刊，民國八十一年六月）
     二、丘周剛，「罷工與替代罷工者～微視美國勞工法規範」（法學叢刊，民國八十一年七月號）
     三、林明鏘，「憲政改革與公物元制度」（法令月刊第四十三卷第一期）
     四、趙守博，「健全勞動法制的方向與重點」（民國七九年十一月）
     五、趙守博，「當前勞工行政的目標與工作重點」（勞弓形證第三十九期，民國八十年七月一日）
     六、焦興鎧，「美國勞工法對私立大專院校教授組織公會之不當限制」美國研究第十九卷第一期（民國七十八年三月）。
     七、焦興鎧，「美國法上不當解僱之概念及其救濟之道」，美國研究第十八卷第二期（民國七十七年六月）
     八、顏良恭，「民營化與美國的公共行政」（美國月刊第六十六期，民國八十年十月）
     九、蔡震榮，「從德、日兩國特別權利關係理論探討我國當前特別權力關係應發展之方向」警政學報第十四期，民國七十七年）
     十、黃越欽，「從勞動鬥爭權到和諧義務」（政大法學評論第三十九期民國七十八年六月）
     肆、譯著
     一、丘周剛譯，「勞資爭議：罷工及閉廠之法律」法學論叢第一四二期，民國八十年四月）
     二、丘周剛譯，「公營企業職員罷工立法與公眾安全訴求：英、日法制之比較研究」（勞工行政第四十一、四十二期，民國八十年九月、十月）
     三、彭錦鵬譯，「公務員工會有損民主政治？」（收於「憲政思潮」第八十二其之「工部門公會的集體談判是否損及民主政治？」）
     伍、報紙
     一、中國時報（民國八十一年一月四日第六版）
     二、經濟日報（民國八十一年一月二十二日第二版）
     三、自立晚報（民國八十一年一月二十七日第三版）
     四、聯合報（民國八十一年一月三日第四版）
     （二）英文部分
     一、英文書籍
     1.Aaron,B.,Grodin,J.&Stern,J.,Public-Sector Bargaining(Washington: Bureau of National Affairs, 1979).
     2.Atleson,J.,Values and Assumptions in American Labor Law(1983).
     3.Bent,A.E.&ReevesT.Z.,Collective Bargaining in the Public Sector: Labor Management Relation and Public Policy (1978).
     4.Blum,A.A.et.al. White-Collar Workers,(New York: Random. House,1971).
     5.Boehm,R. & Heldnan,O., Public Employees, Unions and the Erosion of Civil Trust:A Case Study of San Francisco in the 1970`s(1982).
     6.BOK,A.C.O.&GORMAN,R.,Cases And Materials On Labor Law( 9th 1981).
     7.Chamberl in, N.&Kuhn, J. "Collective Bargaining" C2d ed.1965).
     8.Gorman,R.,Basic Text on Labor Law: Unionization and Collective Bargaining (1976),
     9.Hanslowe,K.,The Emerging Law of Labor Relations in Public Employment (lthaca,N.Y.: ILR Press,1967).
     10.Hogler,R.,Public Sector Strikes: Employee Rights, Union Responsibilities and Employer Prerogative(International Personnel Management Association,1988).
     11.Marx,H.L.Jr.,Bargaining for Public Employees, (New York: H. W. Wilson, 1969).
     12.IL0, Freedom of Association and Procedureres for staff participation in determining conditions of employment in the public service, Report 1 ,Joint Committee on the Public Service, First Session,(Geneva 1971).
     13. ---,Freedom of Association and Procedureres for Determining Conditions of Employment in the Public Service, Geneva(976)
     14.---, Conditions of work and employment in water, gas and electricity supply service,(Geneva,1982).
     15.Juris H. A. and Peter ,F, Police Unionism: Power and Impact in Public-Sector Bargaining(Lexington, Mass. :D. C. Heath and Co.,1973).
     16.Kochan,T.,Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations" (Homewood, Ill. :Richard O.lrwin,1980).
     17.Koehan,T.,et al.,Dispute Resolution under Fact-finding and Arbitration(New York: American Arbitration Ass`N.1979).
     18.Kolb,D.,The Mediators(Cambridge:M1T Press,1983).
     19.Lipset,S.,Unions in Transition: Entering the Second Century (San Francisco: ICS Press, 1986).
     20.Rhyne, C.Labor Unions and Municiple Employee Law(Washington, D. C., 1946).
     21.Schick,R.&Couturier,J.,The Public Interest In Government Labor Relations(1977).
     22.Siwkin,W.,"Hedaition and the Dynamics of Collective Bargaining(Washington: Bureau of National Affairs,1971).
     23.Voslloo,W.8.,Collective Bargaining in the United States Federal Civil Service(Chicago: Public Personnel Administration,1966).
     24.Weiler,P."Public Unionism and Public Finances .(1979)
     二、英文期刊
     1.Alstyne,"`Cracks`in The New Property :Adjudicative Due Process in the Administrative State",62 CORNELL L.REV.(1977).
     2.Anderson,Mac Donald & O`Reill, "Impasse Resolution in Public Sector Collective Bargaining-An Examination of Compulsory Interest Arbitration in New York,51 St.John`s L.Rev.(1977)
     3.Baird, "On Strikers and Their Replacements "Government Union Review Vol.12 N.3 SUII.(991).
     4.Birk,"Industrial Conflict: The Law of Strikes and Lock-Outs at Comparative Labor Law and Industrial Relations,1987 p.402.
     5.Burton,"Public Sector Unionism: An Economic Perspective" Government Union Review Vol.3 Nr.2 Spring (1982).
     6.Burton&Krider, "The Role and Consequences of Strikes by Public Employees,79 Yale L.J.(1970).
     7.Michael Cole, "Public Employee Strikes: The Law and Possible Alternatives", The Cumberland Law Review Vol.11(1980)
     8.Conant,"Agency Problems in the Public Sector Labor Relation", Government Union Review Vol.10 Nr.3 (1989).
     9.Dripps,"New Directions for the Regulation of Public Employee Strikes ",New York University Law Review Vol.60(19S5).
     10. Edwards, "The Developing Labor Relations Law in the Public Sector",10 Duq. L.REV.(1972) o
     l1.-------,"The Emergining Duty to Bargain in the Public Sector, 71 MICH.L.REV.(l973).
     12.Estreicher, "Strikers and Replacements ",Labor Law Journal May(l987)
     13.Feuille, "Selected Benefits and Costs of Compulsory Arbitration", 33 INDUS.&LAB.REL.REV.(1972)`
     14.Freeman&Medoff,"The Two Faces of Unionism",57 PUB.INTEREST(1979).
     15.Gilllespie,The MacKay Doctrine and the Myth of Business Necessity, 50 TEX. L. Rev. (1972)
     16.Hampton, "Federal Labor - Hanage.ent Relations:(I. Program in Evoluation,21 CATH.U.L.REV.(1972).
     17.Hanslowe&Acierno, "The Law and Theory of Strikes by Government Ernployees" , 67 Cornell L. REV. (1982)
     18.Jennings,et al."Fact-finding in Perspective" Government Union Review Vo1.8 No.3 Summer (1987).
     19.Kuwahara,"Pulic Employee Strikes Demanding Their Legislation and Their Safety: A Comparative Study on Japanese and The U.S. Law", Hosei Riron Vol.13 (1981).
     20.Lieberman," Public Sector Bargaining: A Policy Reappraisal Government Union Review(1980).
     21.---------,"Binding Arbitration In Public Employment: A Reappraisal" Government Union Review Vol. l Nr.2 Spring(1980)
     22.--- - -----,"Academic Bias in Public Sector Labor Relation" Government Union Review Vol.3 Nr.3 Fall(1982).
     23.Love&Sulzner,"Political Implications of Public Employee Bargaining",2 INDU.REL. (972).
     24.Lynd, "Investment Decisions and the Quid Pro Quo Myth",29 CASE ~.RES. L.REV.(1979).
     25.Mann,"The Taylor Law: Strike Penality and Strikes",51 N.Y. ST.B.J. (979).
     26.McCann&Smile)`, "The National Labor Relations Act and the Regulation of Public Employee Collective Bargaining,13 Harv. J. on LEGIS. (976).
     27.Meltzer&Sunstein, "Public Employee Strikes, Executive Discretion, and the Air Traffic Controller"50 U.CHI.L.REV. (1983).
     28.Mitchell,"Public Sector Union Security: The Impact of Abood",29 LAB.L.J.(1978).
     29.Monaghan,Of"Liberity"and "Property",62 CORNELL L.REV.(1977) ?
     30.Nolan,"Public Employee Unionism in the Southeast: The Legal Parameters,29 S.C.L.REV. (978),
     31.Note,"Collective Bargaining and the Professional Employee, 69 COLUM. L. REV. (1969) .
     32.----,"Public Employee Bargaining In North Carolina: From Pateralism to Confusion,59 N.C.L.REV.(1980).
     33.----,"The Law and Theory of Strikes by Government Employees" Cornell Law Review Vol.67(1982).
     34.Olson,"The Us e of the Legal Right to Strike in the Public Sector",33 LAB.L.J.(1982).
     35.Podgers, "Public Sector Labor Dispute: A Balancing Act for Judges, 66 A.B.A.J.(1980)
     36.Reynolds, "Cause and Effect in Public Sector Unionism: An Economic Analysis”, Government Union Review Vol.4 Nr.l Winter(1983).
     37.Rosenblum 8. Steinbach, "Federal Employee Labor Relations :From the `Gag Rule` to Executive Order 11491",59 KY.L. J.(1971).
     ~8.Tim Schooley, "The Reinstatement Rights of Striking" Industrial Relations Law Journal Vol.9 No.2(1987).
     39.Schregle ,"Labour Relations in the Public Sector "at Comparative Labor Law and Industrial Relations ,513-516(1987)
     40.Seder, "Strikers` Reinstatement Rights" ,WI .L.REY. (1983).
     41.Smith,"State and Local Advisor? Reports on Public Employment Labor Legislations: A Comparative Analysis",67 MICH. L.REV.(969).
     42.-----"New Federal Employee Union Political Activism(Government Union Review Vol.4 Spring 1983).
     43.Summers, "Public Sector Collective Bargaining Substantially Diminishes Democracy" ,Government Union Review(19S0).
     44.Troy,"Public Sector Unionism: The Rising Power Center of Organized Labor" ,Government Union Review Yol.9 Nr.2 Spring (1988) .
     45. Weiler,"Striking a New Balance: Freedom of Contract and the Prospects for Union Representation,98 Harvard L.Rev.(1985)
     46.Weisenfeld,"Public Employees-First or Second Class Citizen? 16 Lab .L.J.(1965).
     47.Wellington and Winter, "The Limits of Collective Bargaining in Public Employment "The Yale Law Journal,Vol.78 Number 7, June 1969).
     48.Wilson,"The Replacement of Lawful Economic Strikers in the Public Sector in Ohio,"46 Ohio St. Law Journal(1985).
     49.Wollet,"The Bargaining Process in the Public Sector: What is Bargainable?" 51 OR.L.REV. (1971).		zh_TW