1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 寫作之觀念產出歷程研究
作者 羅素貞
LUO, RONG-RUI
貢獻者 顏乃欣
YAN, NAI-XIN
羅素貞
LUO, RONG-RUI
關鍵詞 寫作
觀念
歷程研究
教育
日期 1993
1992
上傳時間 2-May-2016 15:27:16 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究旨在探討不同因素對寫作時觀念產出過程之影響。研究共分二階段實驗，第
參考文獻 王明通。 (民78) 。 「中國團文教學法研究」。 台北:五南。
     任興聲。(民77) 。 「 文章的結構訓練」 。 台北:前程。
     林義烈。 (民79) 。 「 細說作文」 。 台北:幼獅。
     張新仁。 (民81) 。 「 寫作教學研究:認知心理學取向」 。 高雄:復文。
     張新仁。 (民78) 。 不同學科教學歷程分析。「教育研究」 第三期，
     41-59 。
     陳學志。 (民81) 。 「 人類的知識表徵與結構」 。 一九九二認知科學研
     討會。
     黃昆輝。 (民68) 。 國民小學語文教學績效之調查研究。 「 師大教育研
     究所集刊」 第21 輯， 193------250。 。
     黃秀瑄、林瑞欽。 (民80) 。 「 認知心理學」 。 台北:師大書苑。
     黃宣範。 (民72) 。 「 漢語語法」 。 台北:文鶴。
     曾華忠、。 (民80a) 。 「 作文津梁、一一作法總論」 。 台北:學人。
     - 94 一
     會華忠。 (民80 b) 。「 作文津梁一一論說文篇」 。 台北:學人。
     劉蘭英、孫全洲。 (民79) 。 「 語法與修詞」 。 台北:新學識。
     蔡明津。(民80) 。「寫作過程教學法對國小學童寫作教學成效之研究」
     。 國立高雄師範學院教育研究所碩士論文。
     賴慶雄。 (民77) 。「 作文題海」 。 台北:國語日報。
     蘇緬華。 (民75) 。「 多命題句子的理解歷程」 。 國立台灣大學心理研究所碩
     士論文。
     
     
     二、英文部分
     Anderson, J. R. (1976). Language, memory ,and thought.
     Hi Ilsdale, N.J. :Erlbaum.
     Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition.
     Cambridge, MA: Harvard lniversity press.
     Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its
     implication (2th.), N. Y.:Freeman.
     Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative
     memory. Wash i ngton, D. C.: Hem i sphere press.
     Bereiter, C. (1 9 8 0). Develop men tin writin g. inn L. W. Gregg
     & E. R. Steinberg(Eds.), Cognitive process In writing .
     Hillsdale, N. J.:Erlbaum.
     Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of
     written composition. Hillsdale, K. J. :Erlbaum.
     Bovair, S.,& Kieras, D. E. (1985). A guide to propositional
     analysis for researcch on technical prose. In B. K.
     Britton, & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository
     text. Hi Ilsdale, N. J. :Erlbaum.
     Bruce, B., Collins, A., Rubin, A. D., & Gentner, D. (1982).
     Three perspectives on writing. Educational Psychologist,
     17 131-145.
     Caccamise, D. J. (1987). Idea generation In writing. In A.
     Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time. Norwood, N.J.:
     Ablex.
     Clark, H. H. (1974). Semantic and comprehension. In R. A.
     Sebeok(Ed.), Current trends in linguistics. Vol.12,
     The Hague: Mouton.
     ColliI1S, A. M., & GenLner, D. (1980). A framework for a
     cognitive theory of writing. In L. W. Gregg & E. R.
     Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive process In writing. Hillsdale,
     N:. J.: Erlbaum.
     Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation
     theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82,
     407-428.
     Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from
     semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
     Behavior, 8, 240-247.
     Collins, A. M., & Quillian,:VI. R. (1972). How to make a
     language user. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),
     Organization of memory. Nell` York :Academic press.
     Conard, C. (1972). Cognitive economy in semantic memory.
     Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92,149-154.
     Englert, C. S., Stewart, S. R., & Hiebert, E. H. (1988). Young
     wrtiers use of text structure in expository text generation.
     Journal of Educational Psychology, 80,143-151.
     Eysenck, M. W. (1986). A Handbook of cognitive psychology.
     Hi Ilsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
     Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The Dynamics of composing:
     Make plans and juggling constraints. In L. E. Gregg & E.R.
     Steinberg (Eds), Cogniteve process In writing. Hillsdale,
     N. J.: Erlbaum.
     Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory
     of writing. College Composition and Communucation, 33,
     365 - 387.
     Frederiksen, C. H. (1975). Reprenting logical and semantic
     structure of knowledge acquired from discourse. Cognitive
     Psychology, 7, 371-485 .
     Frederiksen, C. H. , & Dominic, J. F. (1981). Writing: The
     nature, development, and teaching of written communicat ion
     , Vol.2. Hillsdale, N. J.:Erlbaum.
     frederiksen, C. H., & Donin-frederiksen, J . (1991). Constructing
     multiple semantic presentation in comprehension and producing
     discourse. In G. Denhiere, & J. P. Rossi (Eds.), Text and text
     processIng. Amesterdam: North -Holland.
     frederiksen, C. H., Donin-frederiksen, J., & Bracewell, R.
     (1987). Discourse analysis of children`s text production .
     In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time., Norwood, N.J.
     : Ablex.
     Gould, J. D. (1978a).An Experimental study on writing, dictating
     I and speaking. In J. Requin (Ed . ) , Attention and performance
     VII. Hillsdale, N. J.:Erlbaum.
     Gould, J. D. (1978b).How expert dictate. Journal of Experimental
     Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 648-661.
     Gould, J. D. (1980). Experiments on composIng letters : Some
     facts, some myths, and some observations. In L. W. Gregg
     & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive process In writing.
     Hi llsdale, N:. J. : Erlbaum.
     Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the
     organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R.
     Ste i nberg (Eds.), Cognitive process In writing. Hi llsdale,
     N. J.: Erlbaum.
     Hidi, S. , & Hildyard, A. (1983). The composition of oral
     written production of two discourse type. Discourse
     Process, 6, 91- 105.
     Hillock, G. (1984). What works In teaching composition:
     A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies
     American Journal of Education. 93, 133-170.
     Hi I lock, G. (1987). Synthesis of research on teaching writ i ng.
     Educational Leade r ship, May, 71- 82.
     Hirsh, C. D. Jr. (1977). The philosophy of composition.
     Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Kintsch, W. (197 2). Kotes on the structure of semantic memory.
     In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Cds . ), Organization of
     memory. New York: Acadamic Press.
     Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meanIng in memory.
     Hillsdale, N. J.:Erlbaum.
     
     Kintsch, W. (1978). Comprehension and memory of text. In W.K. Estes(Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: Vol. 6. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
     Kintsch, W. (1980). Psychological process in discourse production. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Psycholingustic models of production. Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
     Kintsch, W. & Keenan, J.M (1973). Reading rate and retenion as a function of the number of the propositions in the structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257-274.
     Kintsch, W., Kozminsky, E., Streby, W. J. , Mckoon, F., & Keenan, J. M. (1975). Summarizing scrambled stories. Memory and Cognition, 5, 547-552.
     Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
     Larsen, S. C. (1987). Assessing the Writing Abilities and instructional needs of students . Austin , Texas: Industrial Oaks Boulevard.
     
     Mandler, T. M. A., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of
     things passed: Story structure and recal I. Cognitive
     Psychology, 9, 111-151.
     McCutchen, D. (1986). Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge
     in the development of writing abi I ity . Journal of Memory and
     Language, 25, 431-444.
     Meyer, B.J.F. (1985). Prose analysis: Purpose, precedures and
     problem. In B. K. Britton, & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding
     expository text. Hillsdale, ~. J.:Erlbaum.
     Minsky, M. (1975). A framework of representation of knowledge.
     In P. Winston (Ed.), The Psychology of computer vISion.
     New York: McGraw-hi I I.
     Olsen, D. R. (1977). from utterence to text: The bias of
     language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review,
     A.L 257-281 .
     Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1979). Retr i eval from long term store:
     A general theory and mathematical models . Druk: Stiching
     Studentenpers Nijmegen.
     Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory
     of probabi I itic search of associative memory. In G. Bower
     (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 14.
     New York: Academic Press.
     Raaijmakers, J. G. IV., & Shffrin, R. M. (1981). Search for
     associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-13.
     Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic
     distance and verification of semantic relations. Iournal
     of Verbal Language and Verbal Behavior, 12, 1-20 .
     Rohman, D. G.(1965). Prewriting, the stage of discovery in
     the writing process. College COmposition and Communication,
     16 106-112.
     Rubin, A. D. A. (1980). A theoretical taxonomy of the
     defference between oral and written language. In R. J.
     Spiro, B. C. Bruce & W. f. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical
     Issues 111 reading comprehension. Hi tIsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum .
     Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning
     and restructuing: Three modes of learning. In J. W. Cotton
     & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic factors in cocgnition.
     Hi llsdal.e, N. J. :Erlbaum.
     Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1988). Representation in
     memory. In R.`C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey,
     & R. D. Ruth (Eds.), Stevens` handbook of experimental
     psychology. New York: Wi lley.
     Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of
     knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J, Spiro, & W
     E. Montage (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge
     . Hillsdale, w. J.:Erlbaum.
     Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986a). Research on written
     composit ion. In M. C. Witt rock ( Ed . ) ,Handbook of research
     on teaching. New York: Macmillan.
     ScardamaIia, M., & Bereiter, C . (1 9 8 6 b ). Writing. In R. F.
     Dillon, & R. J. Sterngerg (Eds.), Cognition and instruction.
     New York: Academic press.
     Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C. , & Woodruff, E. (1980). The
     effects of content knowledge on writing. Paper presented
     at Educational Research Association, Boston.
     Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scrips, plans, goals and
     .J1Jld e r s tan din g. Hillsdale, K. J.: E rib all m .
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004313
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 顏乃欣zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor YAN, NAI-XINen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 羅素貞zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) LUO, RONG-RUIen_US
dc.creator (作者) 羅素貞zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) LUO, RONG-RUIen_US
dc.date (日期) 1993en_US
dc.date (日期) 1992en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-May-2016 15:27:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-May-2016 15:27:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-May-2016 15:27:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002004313en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89464-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育學系zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在探討不同因素對寫作時觀念產出過程之影響。研究共分二階段實驗，第zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .１
     第一節 研究動機. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .１
     第二節 研究目的. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .５
     第三節 重要名詞解釋. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .６
     第四節 研究限制. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .７
     
     第二章 文獻探討. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .８
     第一節 寫作過程與觀念產出之研究. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .９
     第二節 人類的知識表徵與結構. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .２０
     第三節 Kintsch的命題表徵模式及寫作時之觀念產出過程. . . . . . . . . . .３６
     
     第三章 實驗一. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .５０
     第一節 實驗方法. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .５６
     第二節 結果與討論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .６４
     
     第四章 實驗二. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .７７
     第一節 實驗方法. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .７７
     第二節 結果與討論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .８１
     
     第五章 結論與建議. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .８６
     第一節 結論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .８６
     第二節 建議. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .８９
     
     參考文獻. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .９３
     
     附錄一　題目熟悉度評量問卷. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .１０６
     
     附錄二　文章命題分析規則. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . １０８
     
     附錄三　文章命題分析示例. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .１２０
     
     附錄四　熟悉度與特殊度二因素在各依變項上之變異數分析摘要表. . . . .１２８
     
     附錄五　扣除無關命題後熟悉度與特殊度二因素在各依變項上之變異數分析摘要表. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .１３２
     
     附錄六　實驗二之範文與文章結構分析提釋. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .１３５
     
     附錄七　不同文章結構提示度在各依變項上之變異數分析摘要表. . . . . .１３６		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004313en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 寫作zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 觀念zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 歷程研究zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教育zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 寫作之觀念產出歷程研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王明通。 (民78) 。 「中國團文教學法研究」。 台北:五南。
     任興聲。(民77) 。 「 文章的結構訓練」 。 台北:前程。
     林義烈。 (民79) 。 「 細說作文」 。 台北:幼獅。
     張新仁。 (民81) 。 「 寫作教學研究:認知心理學取向」 。 高雄:復文。
     張新仁。 (民78) 。 不同學科教學歷程分析。「教育研究」 第三期，
     41-59 。
     陳學志。 (民81) 。 「 人類的知識表徵與結構」 。 一九九二認知科學研
     討會。
     黃昆輝。 (民68) 。 國民小學語文教學績效之調查研究。 「 師大教育研
     究所集刊」 第21 輯， 193------250。 。
     黃秀瑄、林瑞欽。 (民80) 。 「 認知心理學」 。 台北:師大書苑。
     黃宣範。 (民72) 。 「 漢語語法」 。 台北:文鶴。
     曾華忠、。 (民80a) 。 「 作文津梁、一一作法總論」 。 台北:學人。
     - 94 一
     會華忠。 (民80 b) 。「 作文津梁一一論說文篇」 。 台北:學人。
     劉蘭英、孫全洲。 (民79) 。 「 語法與修詞」 。 台北:新學識。
     蔡明津。(民80) 。「寫作過程教學法對國小學童寫作教學成效之研究」
     。 國立高雄師範學院教育研究所碩士論文。
     賴慶雄。 (民77) 。「 作文題海」 。 台北:國語日報。
     蘇緬華。 (民75) 。「 多命題句子的理解歷程」 。 國立台灣大學心理研究所碩
     士論文。
     
     
     二、英文部分
     Anderson, J. R. (1976). Language, memory ,and thought.
     Hi Ilsdale, N.J. :Erlbaum.
     Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition.
     Cambridge, MA: Harvard lniversity press.
     Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its
     implication (2th.), N. Y.:Freeman.
     Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative
     memory. Wash i ngton, D. C.: Hem i sphere press.
     Bereiter, C. (1 9 8 0). Develop men tin writin g. inn L. W. Gregg
     & E. R. Steinberg(Eds.), Cognitive process In writing .
     Hillsdale, N. J.:Erlbaum.
     Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of
     written composition. Hillsdale, K. J. :Erlbaum.
     Bovair, S.,& Kieras, D. E. (1985). A guide to propositional
     analysis for researcch on technical prose. In B. K.
     Britton, & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository
     text. Hi Ilsdale, N. J. :Erlbaum.
     Bruce, B., Collins, A., Rubin, A. D., & Gentner, D. (1982).
     Three perspectives on writing. Educational Psychologist,
     17 131-145.
     Caccamise, D. J. (1987). Idea generation In writing. In A.
     Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time. Norwood, N.J.:
     Ablex.
     Clark, H. H. (1974). Semantic and comprehension. In R. A.
     Sebeok(Ed.), Current trends in linguistics. Vol.12,
     The Hague: Mouton.
     ColliI1S, A. M., & GenLner, D. (1980). A framework for a
     cognitive theory of writing. In L. W. Gregg & E. R.
     Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive process In writing. Hillsdale,
     N:. J.: Erlbaum.
     Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation
     theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82,
     407-428.
     Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from
     semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
     Behavior, 8, 240-247.
     Collins, A. M., & Quillian,:VI. R. (1972). How to make a
     language user. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),
     Organization of memory. Nell` York :Academic press.
     Conard, C. (1972). Cognitive economy in semantic memory.
     Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92,149-154.
     Englert, C. S., Stewart, S. R., & Hiebert, E. H. (1988). Young
     wrtiers use of text structure in expository text generation.
     Journal of Educational Psychology, 80,143-151.
     Eysenck, M. W. (1986). A Handbook of cognitive psychology.
     Hi Ilsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
     Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The Dynamics of composing:
     Make plans and juggling constraints. In L. E. Gregg & E.R.
     Steinberg (Eds), Cogniteve process In writing. Hillsdale,
     N. J.: Erlbaum.
     Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory
     of writing. College Composition and Communucation, 33,
     365 - 387.
     Frederiksen, C. H. (1975). Reprenting logical and semantic
     structure of knowledge acquired from discourse. Cognitive
     Psychology, 7, 371-485 .
     Frederiksen, C. H. , & Dominic, J. F. (1981). Writing: The
     nature, development, and teaching of written communicat ion
     , Vol.2. Hillsdale, N. J.:Erlbaum.
     frederiksen, C. H., & Donin-frederiksen, J . (1991). Constructing
     multiple semantic presentation in comprehension and producing
     discourse. In G. Denhiere, & J. P. Rossi (Eds.), Text and text
     processIng. Amesterdam: North -Holland.
     frederiksen, C. H., Donin-frederiksen, J., & Bracewell, R.
     (1987). Discourse analysis of children`s text production .
     In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time., Norwood, N.J.
     : Ablex.
     Gould, J. D. (1978a).An Experimental study on writing, dictating
     I and speaking. In J. Requin (Ed . ) , Attention and performance
     VII. Hillsdale, N. J.:Erlbaum.
     Gould, J. D. (1978b).How expert dictate. Journal of Experimental
     Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 648-661.
     Gould, J. D. (1980). Experiments on composIng letters : Some
     facts, some myths, and some observations. In L. W. Gregg
     & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive process In writing.
     Hi llsdale, N:. J. : Erlbaum.
     Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the
     organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R.
     Ste i nberg (Eds.), Cognitive process In writing. Hi llsdale,
     N. J.: Erlbaum.
     Hidi, S. , & Hildyard, A. (1983). The composition of oral
     written production of two discourse type. Discourse
     Process, 6, 91- 105.
     Hillock, G. (1984). What works In teaching composition:
     A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies
     American Journal of Education. 93, 133-170.
     Hi I lock, G. (1987). Synthesis of research on teaching writ i ng.
     Educational Leade r ship, May, 71- 82.
     Hirsh, C. D. Jr. (1977). The philosophy of composition.
     Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Kintsch, W. (197 2). Kotes on the structure of semantic memory.
     In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Cds . ), Organization of
     memory. New York: Acadamic Press.
     Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meanIng in memory.
     Hillsdale, N. J.:Erlbaum.
     
     Kintsch, W. (1978). Comprehension and memory of text. In W.K. Estes(Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: Vol. 6. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
     Kintsch, W. (1980). Psychological process in discourse production. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Psycholingustic models of production. Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
     Kintsch, W. & Keenan, J.M (1973). Reading rate and retenion as a function of the number of the propositions in the structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257-274.
     Kintsch, W., Kozminsky, E., Streby, W. J. , Mckoon, F., & Keenan, J. M. (1975). Summarizing scrambled stories. Memory and Cognition, 5, 547-552.
     Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
     Larsen, S. C. (1987). Assessing the Writing Abilities and instructional needs of students . Austin , Texas: Industrial Oaks Boulevard.
     
     Mandler, T. M. A., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of
     things passed: Story structure and recal I. Cognitive
     Psychology, 9, 111-151.
     McCutchen, D. (1986). Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge
     in the development of writing abi I ity . Journal of Memory and
     Language, 25, 431-444.
     Meyer, B.J.F. (1985). Prose analysis: Purpose, precedures and
     problem. In B. K. Britton, & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding
     expository text. Hillsdale, ~. J.:Erlbaum.
     Minsky, M. (1975). A framework of representation of knowledge.
     In P. Winston (Ed.), The Psychology of computer vISion.
     New York: McGraw-hi I I.
     Olsen, D. R. (1977). from utterence to text: The bias of
     language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review,
     A.L 257-281 .
     Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1979). Retr i eval from long term store:
     A general theory and mathematical models . Druk: Stiching
     Studentenpers Nijmegen.
     Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory
     of probabi I itic search of associative memory. In G. Bower
     (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 14.
     New York: Academic Press.
     Raaijmakers, J. G. IV., & Shffrin, R. M. (1981). Search for
     associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-13.
     Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic
     distance and verification of semantic relations. Iournal
     of Verbal Language and Verbal Behavior, 12, 1-20 .
     Rohman, D. G.(1965). Prewriting, the stage of discovery in
     the writing process. College COmposition and Communication,
     16 106-112.
     Rubin, A. D. A. (1980). A theoretical taxonomy of the
     defference between oral and written language. In R. J.
     Spiro, B. C. Bruce & W. f. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical
     Issues 111 reading comprehension. Hi tIsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum .
     Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning
     and restructuing: Three modes of learning. In J. W. Cotton
     & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic factors in cocgnition.
     Hi llsdal.e, N. J. :Erlbaum.
     Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1988). Representation in
     memory. In R.`C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey,
     & R. D. Ruth (Eds.), Stevens` handbook of experimental
     psychology. New York: Wi lley.
     Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of
     knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J, Spiro, & W
     E. Montage (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge
     . Hillsdale, w. J.:Erlbaum.
     Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986a). Research on written
     composit ion. In M. C. Witt rock ( Ed . ) ,Handbook of research
     on teaching. New York: Macmillan.
     ScardamaIia, M., & Bereiter, C . (1 9 8 6 b ). Writing. In R. F.
     Dillon, & R. J. Sterngerg (Eds.), Cognition and instruction.
     New York: Academic press.
     Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C. , & Woodruff, E. (1980). The
     effects of content knowledge on writing. Paper presented
     at Educational Research Association, Boston.
     Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scrips, plans, goals and
     .J1Jld e r s tan din g. Hillsdale, K. J.: E rib all m .		zh_TW