1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 教育學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 我國大學院校教師研究出產力之相關研究
作者 黃增榮
貢獻者 馬信行
黃增榮
日期 1991
1990
上傳時間 2-五月-2016 17:12:20 (UTC+8)
摘要 論文提要內容:
參考文獻 委李云考書書目
     一、中文部份
     大家談雜誌(民77) 國科會不科學-對研究獎助12點質疑大家談雜誌，4期，3月
     中央圖書館(民78) 中華民國圖書年鑑七十四年度。台北。
     行政院國科會(民73) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國72年度。台北。
     行政院國科會(民74) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國73年度。台北。
     行政院國科會(民75) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國74年度。台北。
     行政院國科會(民76) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國75年度。台北。
     行政院國科會(民77) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國76年度。台北。
     行政院國科會科學技術中心(民73) 七十二學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。
     行政院國科會科學技術中心(民74) 七十三學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。
     行政院國科會科學技術中心(民75) 七十四學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。
     行政院國科會科學技術中心(民76) 七十五學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。
     行政院國科會科學技術中心(民77) 七十六學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。
     林勝華(民74) 由基礎科學的評估談計劃審查。科學發展月刊，13卷5期，559-565
     范永遠(民73) 行政院國家科學委員會、美國國家科學基金會及美
     國國家健康研究計劃審查系統之探討。科學發展月刊，12卷5期357-358。
     馬信行(民74) 影響我國大專院校教師研究出產力因素之研究。台北:桂冠。
     馬信行(民75 (a)) 影響我國高等教育機構研究出產力之因素。 政大學報53期， 85-117。
     馬信行(民75(b)) 教育社會學。台北:桂冠。
     馬信行(民79) 我國教育分佈之均等度及未來高等教育發展的策略政大學報62期，1- 27
     教育部(民79) 中華民國大專院校概況統計( 78年度)。台北。
     黃壁惠(民75) 我國大學教師研究出產力及其相關因素之分析。政大教育研究所碩士論文。
     鄧振源‧曾國雄(民77) 大學院研究發展類型與影響因素之研究中國統計學報， 26卷4期，1-33
     鄧振源(民76) 科技發展投入與產出指標之建立。科學發展月刊, 15<10> , 1323-1339
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     二、英文部份
     Allison, P .D. & Stewart, J .A. (1974) .Productivity difference among
     scientist evidence for Cumulative advantage. American
     Sociological Review ,39, 596-606.
     Allison, P.D. (1980). Inequality and scientific productivity. Social
     studies of Science,10,163-179.
     Allison, P.D., Long, L.S.& Krauze, T.K. (1982). Cumulative Advantage
     and inequality in science. American Sociologi.ca] Review,?, 615-625.
     Allison, P.D & Long, L.S. (1987). Interuniversity mobility of Academic
     scientists. American Sociological Review ,52,64 7 -652.
     Allison, P .D & Long, L.S. (1990). Depertmental effects on scientific
     productivity. American Sociological Review,55,469-478.
     Bayer ,A.E & Dutton, J .C. (1977). Career age and research professional
     activities of academic scientist. Journal of Higher Education,48(3),259-282.
     Belanger, C.R. (1990). Faculty performance and workload inequity. High
     Education Management.2(2) ,1-23.
     Beyer, J .M. (1978). Editorial polices and practices among leading
     journal in four scientific fields. The Sociological Quarterly,19,66-88.
     Blume, S. S. & Sind a; r , Ruth. ( 1973). Chemists in Birtish universities
     : A study of the reward system in science. American Sociological
     Review, 38, 126-138.
     Cemente, F. (1973). Early career determinants of research productivity.
     American Journal of Sociological,79,409-419.
     Cole, s . & Cole, J ,R. ( 1967 ). Scientific output and recognition: A study in
     the operation of the reward system science. American Sociological
     Review, 32,337-390.
     Cole, S. & Cole, J, R. ( 1968 ). Visibility and the structural bases of awareness
     of scientific research. American Sociological Review,33,377-413.
     Cole, S. (1970). Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoverities
     American Journal of Sociology, 76,286-306.
     Cole, S. & Cole, J .R. (1973). Social Statification in Science. Chicago
     Cole, S . , Cole, J, R. & Rubin, J, ( 1977 ). Peer review and the support of science.
     Scientific American, 237 ( 4) ,34-41.
     Cole, S. (1979). Age and scientific perfenmance, American Journal of Sociological
     84,958-977.
     Cole, S. (1983). `!he hierarchy of the science? American Journal of Sociology,
     111-139.
     Cole, S. ,Cole, J.R. & Simon, G. (1988). Do journal rejetion rates index consensus?
     American Sociological Review,53,152-156.
     Cozzens, s. E. ( 1985 ). Compary the sciences: context context analysis of
     papers from newrophourmacology and the sociology of science. Social
     Studies of Science.15,127-153.
     Crane, D. (1965). Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of
     productivity and recognition. American Sociological Review,30,699-714.
     Cropley, A.J. & Field, T.W. (1969). Achievement in science and intellectual
     style. Journal of Applied Psycholy,2,13-35.
     Faia, M. (1975). Productivity among scientist: A replication and elevoration.
     American Sociological Review,40,825-829.
     Fox, M.F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical.
     Social Studies of Science,13,289-301.
     Goldstone, J .A. (1979). A deductive explanation of the matthew effect in
     science. Social studies of Science9,385-391.
     Hargens, L.L., Nicholas, C.M. & Pamela, K.H. (1980). Research areas and stratification
     processes in science. Social Studies of Science,10,55-74.
     Hargens, L.L. & Hagstrom, W.O. (1982). Scientific consensus and academic
     status attainment patterns. Sociology of Education, 55,183-196.
     Hargens, L.L. & Felmlee, D.H. (1984). Structural determinants of straification
     in science. American Sociological Review, 49 , 685-697 .
     Hargens, L.L. (1988). Scholarly consensus and Journal rejection rates.
     American Sociological Review,53,139-151.
     Hogan, T.D. (1981). Faculty research activity and the quality 6f graduate
     training. The Journal of Human Resources,16,400-415.
     Hogan, T.D. (1985). The publishing performance of us PH.D programs in
     ecomomics during the 1970`s. The Journal of Human Resources,20,217- 229.
     Horgen, T.D. (1978). Relations between work habits, research, technologies and
     fmience in science. Sociology of work and ocx:upation,5,97-112.
     Kyvik, s. (1990). Age and scientific productivity difference between field
     of learning. Higher Fducation,19,37-55.
     Lawren. J.H. & Blackburn, R.T. (1988). Age as a predictor of faculty productivity:`
     Three conoeptual approaches. Journal of Higher Education, 59(1),22-38.
     Lehman, H.C. (1958). The chemist`s most creative year`s. Science,127(23),
     1213-1222.
     Lehman, H.C. (1966). The age decrement in scientific creativity. American
     Psychologist,15,128-134.
     Levin, S.G. & Stephan. (1989). Age and research prodvctivity of academic
     scientists. Research in Higher Fducation,30(5) ,531-549.
     Lodahl, J .B. & Gordan, B. (1972). The structure of scientific field and
     funaioning of university graduate depertments. American Sociological
     Review,37,57-72.
     Long, J.S (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific
     career. American Sociological Review,43,889-908.
     Long, J ,S. , Allison, P, D. & McGinnis, R. ( 1979). Entrance into the academic
     career. American Sociological Review,44,816-831.
     Long, J.S. & McGinnis, R. (1981). Organization context on scientific productivity.
     American Sociological Review,46,422-442.
     MacRoberts, M.H. & MacRoberts, B.R. (1982). A reevaluation of Lotka`s law
     of scientific productivity. &x:ial Studies of Science,12,443-450.
     MacRae,Jr.D. (1969). Growth and decay curves in scientific citations.
     American Sociological Review,34,631-635.
     Martin, B.R. & Jrivin, J. (1983). Assesing basic research. Research policy,
     12(2),61-90.
     McCarrey , M. W. ( 1971). Research climate and scientific accomphishment: An
     interriew with Gerhard Herzberg. Studies in Research Psychology, 13,21-32.
     McCormick, J .M. & Bennick, E.L. (1982). Graduate training and productivity
     :A look at who publish. The Journal of Politics,44,212-217.
     McGinnis, R. , Allison, P,D. & Long, J, B. ( 1982). Postdoctoral training in Bioscience:
     Allocation and outcomes. Social Forces,60( 3),701-722.
     Merton, R.K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the
     sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22,635-659.
     Merton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science,159,56-63.
     Miller ,A.C. & Serzan, S.L. (1984). Criteria for identifying a refered
     journal. Journal of Higher Education,55,673-690.
     Over, R. (1982). Does research productivity decline with age. Higher
     Education,11,511-520.
     Reskin (1977). Scientific productivity and the reward structure of
     science. American Sociological Review ,42,491-504.
     Sharif, M. N (1986) Measurement of technolohy for national development.
     Technological Forecasting and Social Change,29,119-172.
     Simon, R.J. (1974). The work habits of eminent scientists. Sociology of
     work and occupation,1,327-335.
     Stern, N. ( 1978). Age and ad1ievenent in mathematic: A case-study in
     the sociology of science. Social Studies of Science,18,127-140.
     Yablonsky, A.I. (1980). On fundamental regularities of distribution
     of scienti?ic productivity. Scientcxretricsd,3-34.
     Yele, W.C. (1973). One publishing or perishing: Fact or fable? The
     American Sociologist,8,128-134.
     Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific Flite. New York: Free Press.
     Zuckerman, B. (1967). Noble laureates in science: Patterns of productivity
     ,collaboration and authorship. American Sociologyical
     Review, 32,391-403.
     Zuckerman, E. (1967). Noble laureates in science: Patterns of productivity
     , collaboration and authorship. American Sociologyical
     Review, 32, 391-403.
     Zuckerman, E. & Merton, R.K. (1971). Patterns of evalnation in science.
     Institnationalization Structure and Function of the Referee System
     Miner.r:a,9,66-100. (cited fron Bargen (1988)
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002005005
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 馬信行zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 黃增榮zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 黃增榮zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 1991en_US
dc.date (日期) 1990en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-五月-2016 17:12:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-五月-2016 17:12:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-五月-2016 17:12:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) B2002005005en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89887-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育學系zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 論文提要內容:zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論………………..1
     第一節 研究動機與目的………………..1
     第二節 研究問題與架構………………..5
     第三研 究限制………………..6
     第四節 重要名詞詮釋………………..7
     第二章 文獻探討………………..9
     第一節 研究出產力的分配情形9
     第二節 影響研究出產力的相關因素………………..15
     第三章 研究方法………………..50
     第一節 研究假設………………..50
     第二節 研究變項之測量………………..51
     第三節 統計處理………………..53
     第四章 研究結果………………..54
     第一節 我國各大學院校教師研究出產力的分配情形………………..54
     第二節 影響研究出產力的相關因素………………..65
     第五章 結論與建議………………..99
     第一節 討論與結論………………..99
     第二節 建議………………..104		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002005005en_US
dc.title (題名) 我國大學院校教師研究出產力之相關研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 委李云考書書目
     一、中文部份
     大家談雜誌(民77) 國科會不科學-對研究獎助12點質疑大家談雜誌，4期，3月
     中央圖書館(民78) 中華民國圖書年鑑七十四年度。台北。
     行政院國科會(民73) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國72年度。台北。
     行政院國科會(民74) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國73年度。台北。
     行政院國科會(民75) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國74年度。台北。
     行政院國科會(民76) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國75年度。台北。
     行政院國科會(民77) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國76年度。台北。
     行政院國科會科學技術中心(民73) 七十二學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。
     行政院國科會科學技術中心(民74) 七十三學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。
     行政院國科會科學技術中心(民75) 七十四學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。
     行政院國科會科學技術中心(民76) 七十五學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。
     行政院國科會科學技術中心(民77) 七十六學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。
     林勝華(民74) 由基礎科學的評估談計劃審查。科學發展月刊，13卷5期，559-565
     范永遠(民73) 行政院國家科學委員會、美國國家科學基金會及美
     國國家健康研究計劃審查系統之探討。科學發展月刊，12卷5期357-358。
     馬信行(民74) 影響我國大專院校教師研究出產力因素之研究。台北:桂冠。
     馬信行(民75 (a)) 影響我國高等教育機構研究出產力之因素。 政大學報53期， 85-117。
     馬信行(民75(b)) 教育社會學。台北:桂冠。
     馬信行(民79) 我國教育分佈之均等度及未來高等教育發展的策略政大學報62期，1- 27
     教育部(民79) 中華民國大專院校概況統計( 78年度)。台北。
     黃壁惠(民75) 我國大學教師研究出產力及其相關因素之分析。政大教育研究所碩士論文。
     鄧振源‧曾國雄(民77) 大學院研究發展類型與影響因素之研究中國統計學報， 26卷4期，1-33
     鄧振源(民76) 科技發展投入與產出指標之建立。科學發展月刊, 15<10> , 1323-1339
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     二、英文部份
     Allison, P .D. & Stewart, J .A. (1974) .Productivity difference among
     scientist evidence for Cumulative advantage. American
     Sociological Review ,39, 596-606.
     Allison, P.D. (1980). Inequality and scientific productivity. Social
     studies of Science,10,163-179.
     Allison, P.D., Long, L.S.& Krauze, T.K. (1982). Cumulative Advantage
     and inequality in science. American Sociologi.ca] Review,?, 615-625.
     Allison, P.D & Long, L.S. (1987). Interuniversity mobility of Academic
     scientists. American Sociological Review ,52,64 7 -652.
     Allison, P .D & Long, L.S. (1990). Depertmental effects on scientific
     productivity. American Sociological Review,55,469-478.
     Bayer ,A.E & Dutton, J .C. (1977). Career age and research professional
     activities of academic scientist. Journal of Higher Education,48(3),259-282.
     Belanger, C.R. (1990). Faculty performance and workload inequity. High
     Education Management.2(2) ,1-23.
     Beyer, J .M. (1978). Editorial polices and practices among leading
     journal in four scientific fields. The Sociological Quarterly,19,66-88.
     Blume, S. S. & Sind a; r , Ruth. ( 1973). Chemists in Birtish universities
     : A study of the reward system in science. American Sociological
     Review, 38, 126-138.
     Cemente, F. (1973). Early career determinants of research productivity.
     American Journal of Sociological,79,409-419.
     Cole, s . & Cole, J ,R. ( 1967 ). Scientific output and recognition: A study in
     the operation of the reward system science. American Sociological
     Review, 32,337-390.
     Cole, S. & Cole, J, R. ( 1968 ). Visibility and the structural bases of awareness
     of scientific research. American Sociological Review,33,377-413.
     Cole, S. (1970). Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoverities
     American Journal of Sociology, 76,286-306.
     Cole, S. & Cole, J .R. (1973). Social Statification in Science. Chicago
     Cole, S . , Cole, J, R. & Rubin, J, ( 1977 ). Peer review and the support of science.
     Scientific American, 237 ( 4) ,34-41.
     Cole, S. (1979). Age and scientific perfenmance, American Journal of Sociological
     84,958-977.
     Cole, S. (1983). `!he hierarchy of the science? American Journal of Sociology,
     111-139.
     Cole, S. ,Cole, J.R. & Simon, G. (1988). Do journal rejetion rates index consensus?
     American Sociological Review,53,152-156.
     Cozzens, s. E. ( 1985 ). Compary the sciences: context context analysis of
     papers from newrophourmacology and the sociology of science. Social
     Studies of Science.15,127-153.
     Crane, D. (1965). Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of
     productivity and recognition. American Sociological Review,30,699-714.
     Cropley, A.J. & Field, T.W. (1969). Achievement in science and intellectual
     style. Journal of Applied Psycholy,2,13-35.
     Faia, M. (1975). Productivity among scientist: A replication and elevoration.
     American Sociological Review,40,825-829.
     Fox, M.F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical.
     Social Studies of Science,13,289-301.
     Goldstone, J .A. (1979). A deductive explanation of the matthew effect in
     science. Social studies of Science9,385-391.
     Hargens, L.L., Nicholas, C.M. & Pamela, K.H. (1980). Research areas and stratification
     processes in science. Social Studies of Science,10,55-74.
     Hargens, L.L. & Hagstrom, W.O. (1982). Scientific consensus and academic
     status attainment patterns. Sociology of Education, 55,183-196.
     Hargens, L.L. & Felmlee, D.H. (1984). Structural determinants of straification
     in science. American Sociological Review, 49 , 685-697 .
     Hargens, L.L. (1988). Scholarly consensus and Journal rejection rates.
     American Sociological Review,53,139-151.
     Hogan, T.D. (1981). Faculty research activity and the quality 6f graduate
     training. The Journal of Human Resources,16,400-415.
     Hogan, T.D. (1985). The publishing performance of us PH.D programs in
     ecomomics during the 1970`s. The Journal of Human Resources,20,217- 229.
     Horgen, T.D. (1978). Relations between work habits, research, technologies and
     fmience in science. Sociology of work and ocx:upation,5,97-112.
     Kyvik, s. (1990). Age and scientific productivity difference between field
     of learning. Higher Fducation,19,37-55.
     Lawren. J.H. & Blackburn, R.T. (1988). Age as a predictor of faculty productivity:`
     Three conoeptual approaches. Journal of Higher Education, 59(1),22-38.
     Lehman, H.C. (1958). The chemist`s most creative year`s. Science,127(23),
     1213-1222.
     Lehman, H.C. (1966). The age decrement in scientific creativity. American
     Psychologist,15,128-134.
     Levin, S.G. & Stephan. (1989). Age and research prodvctivity of academic
     scientists. Research in Higher Fducation,30(5) ,531-549.
     Lodahl, J .B. & Gordan, B. (1972). The structure of scientific field and
     funaioning of university graduate depertments. American Sociological
     Review,37,57-72.
     Long, J.S (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific
     career. American Sociological Review,43,889-908.
     Long, J ,S. , Allison, P, D. & McGinnis, R. ( 1979). Entrance into the academic
     career. American Sociological Review,44,816-831.
     Long, J.S. & McGinnis, R. (1981). Organization context on scientific productivity.
     American Sociological Review,46,422-442.
     MacRoberts, M.H. & MacRoberts, B.R. (1982). A reevaluation of Lotka`s law
     of scientific productivity. &x:ial Studies of Science,12,443-450.
     MacRae,Jr.D. (1969). Growth and decay curves in scientific citations.
     American Sociological Review,34,631-635.
     Martin, B.R. & Jrivin, J. (1983). Assesing basic research. Research policy,
     12(2),61-90.
     McCarrey , M. W. ( 1971). Research climate and scientific accomphishment: An
     interriew with Gerhard Herzberg. Studies in Research Psychology, 13,21-32.
     McCormick, J .M. & Bennick, E.L. (1982). Graduate training and productivity
     :A look at who publish. The Journal of Politics,44,212-217.
     McGinnis, R. , Allison, P,D. & Long, J, B. ( 1982). Postdoctoral training in Bioscience:
     Allocation and outcomes. Social Forces,60( 3),701-722.
     Merton, R.K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the
     sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22,635-659.
     Merton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science,159,56-63.
     Miller ,A.C. & Serzan, S.L. (1984). Criteria for identifying a refered
     journal. Journal of Higher Education,55,673-690.
     Over, R. (1982). Does research productivity decline with age. Higher
     Education,11,511-520.
     Reskin (1977). Scientific productivity and the reward structure of
     science. American Sociological Review ,42,491-504.
     Sharif, M. N (1986) Measurement of technolohy for national development.
     Technological Forecasting and Social Change,29,119-172.
     Simon, R.J. (1974). The work habits of eminent scientists. Sociology of
     work and occupation,1,327-335.
     Stern, N. ( 1978). Age and ad1ievenent in mathematic: A case-study in
     the sociology of science. Social Studies of Science,18,127-140.
     Yablonsky, A.I. (1980). On fundamental regularities of distribution
     of scienti?ic productivity. Scientcxretricsd,3-34.
     Yele, W.C. (1973). One publishing or perishing: Fact or fable? The
     American Sociologist,8,128-134.
     Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific Flite. New York: Free Press.
     Zuckerman, B. (1967). Noble laureates in science: Patterns of productivity
     ,collaboration and authorship. American Sociologyical
     Review, 32,391-403.
     Zuckerman, E. (1967). Noble laureates in science: Patterns of productivity
     , collaboration and authorship. American Sociologyical
     Review, 32, 391-403.
     Zuckerman, E. & Merton, R.K. (1971). Patterns of evalnation in science.
     Institnationalization Structure and Function of the Referee System
     Miner.r:a,9,66-100. (cited fron Bargen (1988)		zh_TW