1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 我國大學院校教師研究出產力之相關研究
作者 黃增榮
貢獻者 馬信行
黃增榮
日期 1991
1990
上傳時間 2-May-2016 17:12:20 (UTC+8)
摘要 論文提要內容:
參考文獻 委李云考書書目\r\n一、中文部份\r\n大家談雜誌(民77) 國科會不科學-對研究獎助12點質疑大家談雜誌，4期，3月\r\n中央圖書館(民78) 中華民國圖書年鑑七十四年度。台北。\r\n行政院國科會(民73) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國72年度。台北。\r\n行政院國科會(民74) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國73年度。台北。\r\n行政院國科會(民75) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國74年度。台北。\r\n行政院國科會(民76) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國75年度。台北。\r\n行政院國科會(民77) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國76年度。台北。\r\n行政院國科會科學技術中心(民73) 七十二學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。\r\n行政院國科會科學技術中心(民74) 七十三學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。\r\n行政院國科會科學技術中心(民75) 七十四學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。\r\n行政院國科會科學技術中心(民76) 七十五學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。\r\n行政院國科會科學技術中心(民77) 七十六學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。\r\n林勝華(民74) 由基礎科學的評估談計劃審查。科學發展月刊，13卷5期，559-565\r\n范永遠(民73) 行政院國家科學委員會、美國國家科學基金會及美\r\n國國家健康研究計劃審查系統之探討。科學發展月刊，12卷5期357-358。\r\n馬信行(民74) 影響我國大專院校教師研究出產力因素之研究。台北:桂冠。\r\n馬信行(民75 (a)) 影響我國高等教育機構研究出產力之因素。 政大學報53期， 85-117。\r\n馬信行(民75(b)) 教育社會學。台北:桂冠。\r\n馬信行(民79) 我國教育分佈之均等度及未來高等教育發展的策略政大學報62期，1- 27\r\n教育部(民79) 中華民國大專院校概況統計( 78年度)。台北。\r\n黃壁惠(民75) 我國大學教師研究出產力及其相關因素之分析。政大教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n鄧振源‧曾國雄(民77) 大學院研究發展類型與影響因素之研究中國統計學報， 26卷4期，1-33\r\n鄧振源(民76) 科技發展投入與產出指標之建立。科學發展月刊, 15<10> , 1323-1339\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n二、英文部份\r\nAllison, P .D. & Stewart, J .A. (1974) .Productivity difference among\r\nscientist evidence for Cumulative advantage. American\r\nSociological Review ,39, 596-606.\r\nAllison, P.D. (1980). Inequality and scientific productivity. Social\r\nstudies of Science,10,163-179.\r\nAllison, P.D., Long, L.S.& Krauze, T.K. (1982). Cumulative Advantage\r\nand inequality in science. American Sociologi.ca] Review,?, 615-625.\r\nAllison, P.D & Long, L.S. (1987). Interuniversity mobility of Academic\r\nscientists. American Sociological Review ,52,64 7 -652.\r\nAllison, P .D & Long, L.S. (1990). Depertmental effects on scientific\r\nproductivity. American Sociological Review,55,469-478.\r\nBayer ,A.E & Dutton, J .C. (1977). Career age and research professional\r\nactivities of academic scientist. Journal of Higher Education,48(3),259-282.\r\nBelanger, C.R. (1990). Faculty performance and workload inequity. High\r\nEducation Management.2(2) ,1-23.\r\nBeyer, J .M. (1978). Editorial polices and practices among leading\r\njournal in four scientific fields. The Sociological Quarterly,19,66-88.\r\nBlume, S. S. & Sind a; r , Ruth. ( 1973). Chemists in Birtish universities\r\n: A study of the reward system in science. American Sociological\r\nReview, 38, 126-138.\r\nCemente, F. (1973). Early career determinants of research productivity.\r\nAmerican Journal of Sociological,79,409-419.\r\nCole, s . & Cole, J ,R. ( 1967 ). Scientific output and recognition: A study in\r\nthe operation of the reward system science. American Sociological \r\nReview, 32,337-390.\r\nCole, S. & Cole, J, R. ( 1968 ). Visibility and the structural bases of awareness\r\nof scientific research. American Sociological Review,33,377-413.\r\nCole, S. (1970). Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoverities\r\nAmerican Journal of Sociology, 76,286-306.\r\nCole, S. & Cole, J .R. (1973). Social Statification in Science. Chicago\r\nCole, S . , Cole, J, R. & Rubin, J, ( 1977 ). Peer review and the support of science.\r\nScientific American, 237 ( 4) ,34-41.\r\nCole, S. (1979). Age and scientific perfenmance, American Journal of Sociological\r\n84,958-977.\r\nCole, S. (1983). `!he hierarchy of the science? American Journal of Sociology,\r\n111-139.\r\nCole, S. ,Cole, J.R. & Simon, G. (1988). Do journal rejetion rates index consensus?\r\nAmerican Sociological Review,53,152-156.\r\nCozzens, s. E. ( 1985 ). Compary the sciences: context context analysis of\r\npapers from newrophourmacology and the sociology of science. Social\r\nStudies of Science.15,127-153.\r\nCrane, D. (1965). Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of\r\nproductivity and recognition. American Sociological Review,30,699-714.\r\nCropley, A.J. & Field, T.W. (1969). Achievement in science and intellectual\r\nstyle. Journal of Applied Psycholy,2,13-35.\r\nFaia, M. (1975). Productivity among scientist: A replication and elevoration.\r\nAmerican Sociological Review,40,825-829.\r\nFox, M.F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical.\r\nSocial Studies of Science,13,289-301.\r\nGoldstone, J .A. (1979). A deductive explanation of the matthew effect in\r\nscience. Social studies of Science9,385-391.\r\nHargens, L.L., Nicholas, C.M. & Pamela, K.H. (1980). Research areas and stratification\r\nprocesses in science. Social Studies of Science,10,55-74.\r\nHargens, L.L. & Hagstrom, W.O. (1982). Scientific consensus and academic\r\nstatus attainment patterns. Sociology of Education, 55,183-196.\r\nHargens, L.L. & Felmlee, D.H. (1984). Structural determinants of straification\r\nin science. American Sociological Review, 49 , 685-697 .\r\nHargens, L.L. (1988). Scholarly consensus and Journal rejection rates.\r\nAmerican Sociological Review,53,139-151.\r\nHogan, T.D. (1981). Faculty research activity and the quality 6f graduate\r\ntraining. The Journal of Human Resources,16,400-415.\r\nHogan, T.D. (1985). The publishing performance of us PH.D programs in\r\necomomics during the 1970`s. The Journal of Human Resources,20,217- 229.\r\nHorgen, T.D. (1978). Relations between work habits, research, technologies and\r\nfmience in science. Sociology of work and ocx:upation,5,97-112.\r\nKyvik, s. (1990). Age and scientific productivity difference between field\r\nof learning. Higher Fducation,19,37-55.\r\nLawren. J.H. & Blackburn, R.T. (1988). Age as a predictor of faculty productivity:`\r\nThree conoeptual approaches. Journal of Higher Education, 59(1),22-38.\r\nLehman, H.C. (1958). The chemist`s most creative year`s. Science,127(23),\r\n1213-1222.\r\nLehman, H.C. (1966). The age decrement in scientific creativity. American\r\nPsychologist,15,128-134.\r\nLevin, S.G. & Stephan. (1989). Age and research prodvctivity of academic\r\nscientists. Research in Higher Fducation,30(5) ,531-549.\r\nLodahl, J .B. & Gordan, B. (1972). The structure of scientific field and\r\nfunaioning of university graduate depertments. American Sociological\r\nReview,37,57-72.\r\nLong, J.S (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific\r\ncareer. American Sociological Review,43,889-908.\r\nLong, J ,S. , Allison, P, D. & McGinnis, R. ( 1979). Entrance into the academic\r\ncareer. American Sociological Review,44,816-831.\r\nLong, J.S. & McGinnis, R. (1981). Organization context on scientific productivity.\r\nAmerican Sociological Review,46,422-442.\r\nMacRoberts, M.H. & MacRoberts, B.R. (1982). A reevaluation of Lotka`s law\r\nof scientific productivity. &x:ial Studies of Science,12,443-450.\r\nMacRae,Jr.D. (1969). Growth and decay curves in scientific citations.\r\nAmerican Sociological Review,34,631-635.\r\nMartin, B.R. & Jrivin, J. (1983). Assesing basic research. Research policy,\r\n12(2),61-90.\r\nMcCarrey , M. W. ( 1971). Research climate and scientific accomphishment: An\r\ninterriew with Gerhard Herzberg. Studies in Research Psychology, 13,21-32.\r\nMcCormick, J .M. & Bennick, E.L. (1982). Graduate training and productivity\r\n:A look at who publish. The Journal of Politics,44,212-217.\r\nMcGinnis, R. , Allison, P,D. & Long, J, B. ( 1982). Postdoctoral training in Bioscience:\r\nAllocation and outcomes. Social Forces,60( 3),701-722.\r\nMerton, R.K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the\r\nsociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22,635-659.\r\nMerton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science,159,56-63.\r\nMiller ,A.C. & Serzan, S.L. (1984). Criteria for identifying a refered\r\njournal. Journal of Higher Education,55,673-690.\r\nOver, R. (1982). Does research productivity decline with age. Higher\r\nEducation,11,511-520.\r\nReskin (1977). Scientific productivity and the reward structure of\r\nscience. American Sociological Review ,42,491-504.\r\nSharif, M. N (1986) Measurement of technolohy for national development.\r\nTechnological Forecasting and Social Change,29,119-172.\r\nSimon, R.J. (1974). The work habits of eminent scientists. Sociology of\r\nwork and occupation,1,327-335.\r\nStern, N. ( 1978). Age and ad1ievenent in mathematic: A case-study in\r\nthe sociology of science. Social Studies of Science,18,127-140.\r\nYablonsky, A.I. (1980). On fundamental regularities of distribution\r\nof scienti?ic productivity. Scientcxretricsd,3-34.\r\nYele, W.C. (1973). One publishing or perishing: Fact or fable? The\r\nAmerican Sociologist,8,128-134.\r\nZuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific Flite. New York: Free Press.\r\nZuckerman, B. (1967). Noble laureates in science: Patterns of productivity\r\n,collaboration and authorship. American Sociologyical\r\nReview, 32,391-403.\r\nZuckerman, E. (1967). Noble laureates in science: Patterns of productivity\r\n, collaboration and authorship. American Sociologyical\r\nReview, 32, 391-403.\r\nZuckerman, E. & Merton, R.K. (1971). Patterns of evalnation in science.\r\nInstitnationalization Structure and Function of the Referee System\r\nMiner.r:a,9,66-100. (cited fron Bargen (1988)
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002005005
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 馬信行zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃增榮zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 黃增榮zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 1991en_US
dc.date (日期) 1990en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-May-2016 17:12:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-May-2016 17:12:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-May-2016 17:12:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002005005en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=101804-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育學系zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 論文提要內容:zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論………………..1\r\n第一節 研究動機與目的………………..1\r\n第二節 研究問題與架構………………..5\r\n第三研 究限制………………..6\r\n第四節 重要名詞詮釋………………..7\r\n第二章 文獻探討………………..9\r\n第一節 研究出產力的分配情形9\r\n第二節 影響研究出產力的相關因素………………..15\r\n第三章 研究方法………………..50\r\n第一節 研究假設………………..50\r\n第二節 研究變項之測量………………..51\r\n第三節 統計處理………………..53\r\n第四章 研究結果………………..54\r\n第一節 我國各大學院校教師研究出產力的分配情形………………..54\r\n第二節 影響研究出產力的相關因素………………..65\r\n第五章 結論與建議………………..99\r\n第一節 討論與結論………………..99\r\n第二節 建議………………..104zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002005005en_US
dc.title (題名) 我國大學院校教師研究出產力之相關研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 委李云考書書目\r\n一、中文部份\r\n大家談雜誌(民77) 國科會不科學-對研究獎助12點質疑大家談雜誌，4期，3月\r\n中央圖書館(民78) 中華民國圖書年鑑七十四年度。台北。\r\n行政院國科會(民73) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國72年度。台北。\r\n行政院國科會(民74) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國73年度。台北。\r\n行政院國科會(民75) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國74年度。台北。\r\n行政院國科會(民76) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國75年度。台北。\r\n行政院國科會(民77) 行政院國家科學委員會年報，民國76年度。台北。\r\n行政院國科會科學技術中心(民73) 七十二學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。\r\n行政院國科會科學技術中心(民74) 七十三學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。\r\n行政院國科會科學技術中心(民75) 七十四學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。\r\n行政院國科會科學技術中心(民76) 七十五學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。\r\n行政院國科會科學技術中心(民77) 七十六學年度獎助研究論文摘要。台北。\r\n林勝華(民74) 由基礎科學的評估談計劃審查。科學發展月刊，13卷5期，559-565\r\n范永遠(民73) 行政院國家科學委員會、美國國家科學基金會及美\r\n國國家健康研究計劃審查系統之探討。科學發展月刊，12卷5期357-358。\r\n馬信行(民74) 影響我國大專院校教師研究出產力因素之研究。台北:桂冠。\r\n馬信行(民75 (a)) 影響我國高等教育機構研究出產力之因素。 政大學報53期， 85-117。\r\n馬信行(民75(b)) 教育社會學。台北:桂冠。\r\n馬信行(民79) 我國教育分佈之均等度及未來高等教育發展的策略政大學報62期，1- 27\r\n教育部(民79) 中華民國大專院校概況統計( 78年度)。台北。\r\n黃壁惠(民75) 我國大學教師研究出產力及其相關因素之分析。政大教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n鄧振源‧曾國雄(民77) 大學院研究發展類型與影響因素之研究中國統計學報， 26卷4期，1-33\r\n鄧振源(民76) 科技發展投入與產出指標之建立。科學發展月刊, 15<10> , 1323-1339\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n二、英文部份\r\nAllison, P .D. & Stewart, J .A. (1974) .Productivity difference among\r\nscientist evidence for Cumulative advantage. American\r\nSociological Review ,39, 596-606.\r\nAllison, P.D. (1980). Inequality and scientific productivity. Social\r\nstudies of Science,10,163-179.\r\nAllison, P.D., Long, L.S.& Krauze, T.K. (1982). Cumulative Advantage\r\nand inequality in science. American Sociologi.ca] Review,?, 615-625.\r\nAllison, P.D & Long, L.S. (1987). Interuniversity mobility of Academic\r\nscientists. American Sociological Review ,52,64 7 -652.\r\nAllison, P .D & Long, L.S. (1990). Depertmental effects on scientific\r\nproductivity. American Sociological Review,55,469-478.\r\nBayer ,A.E & Dutton, J .C. (1977). Career age and research professional\r\nactivities of academic scientist. Journal of Higher Education,48(3),259-282.\r\nBelanger, C.R. (1990). Faculty performance and workload inequity. High\r\nEducation Management.2(2) ,1-23.\r\nBeyer, J .M. (1978). Editorial polices and practices among leading\r\njournal in four scientific fields. The Sociological Quarterly,19,66-88.\r\nBlume, S. S. & Sind a; r , Ruth. ( 1973). Chemists in Birtish universities\r\n: A study of the reward system in science. American Sociological\r\nReview, 38, 126-138.\r\nCemente, F. (1973). Early career determinants of research productivity.\r\nAmerican Journal of Sociological,79,409-419.\r\nCole, s . & Cole, J ,R. ( 1967 ). Scientific output and recognition: A study in\r\nthe operation of the reward system science. American Sociological \r\nReview, 32,337-390.\r\nCole, S. & Cole, J, R. ( 1968 ). Visibility and the structural bases of awareness\r\nof scientific research. American Sociological Review,33,377-413.\r\nCole, S. (1970). Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoverities\r\nAmerican Journal of Sociology, 76,286-306.\r\nCole, S. & Cole, J .R. (1973). Social Statification in Science. Chicago\r\nCole, S . , Cole, J, R. & Rubin, J, ( 1977 ). Peer review and the support of science.\r\nScientific American, 237 ( 4) ,34-41.\r\nCole, S. (1979). Age and scientific perfenmance, American Journal of Sociological\r\n84,958-977.\r\nCole, S. (1983). `!he hierarchy of the science? American Journal of Sociology,\r\n111-139.\r\nCole, S. ,Cole, J.R. & Simon, G. (1988). Do journal rejetion rates index consensus?\r\nAmerican Sociological Review,53,152-156.\r\nCozzens, s. E. ( 1985 ). Compary the sciences: context context analysis of\r\npapers from newrophourmacology and the sociology of science. Social\r\nStudies of Science.15,127-153.\r\nCrane, D. (1965). Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of\r\nproductivity and recognition. American Sociological Review,30,699-714.\r\nCropley, A.J. & Field, T.W. (1969). Achievement in science and intellectual\r\nstyle. Journal of Applied Psycholy,2,13-35.\r\nFaia, M. (1975). Productivity among scientist: A replication and elevoration.\r\nAmerican Sociological Review,40,825-829.\r\nFox, M.F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical.\r\nSocial Studies of Science,13,289-301.\r\nGoldstone, J .A. (1979). A deductive explanation of the matthew effect in\r\nscience. Social studies of Science9,385-391.\r\nHargens, L.L., Nicholas, C.M. & Pamela, K.H. (1980). Research areas and stratification\r\nprocesses in science. Social Studies of Science,10,55-74.\r\nHargens, L.L. & Hagstrom, W.O. (1982). Scientific consensus and academic\r\nstatus attainment patterns. Sociology of Education, 55,183-196.\r\nHargens, L.L. & Felmlee, D.H. (1984). Structural determinants of straification\r\nin science. American Sociological Review, 49 , 685-697 .\r\nHargens, L.L. (1988). Scholarly consensus and Journal rejection rates.\r\nAmerican Sociological Review,53,139-151.\r\nHogan, T.D. (1981). Faculty research activity and the quality 6f graduate\r\ntraining. The Journal of Human Resources,16,400-415.\r\nHogan, T.D. (1985). The publishing performance of us PH.D programs in\r\necomomics during the 1970`s. The Journal of Human Resources,20,217- 229.\r\nHorgen, T.D. (1978). Relations between work habits, research, technologies and\r\nfmience in science. Sociology of work and ocx:upation,5,97-112.\r\nKyvik, s. (1990). Age and scientific productivity difference between field\r\nof learning. Higher Fducation,19,37-55.\r\nLawren. J.H. & Blackburn, R.T. (1988). Age as a predictor of faculty productivity:`\r\nThree conoeptual approaches. Journal of Higher Education, 59(1),22-38.\r\nLehman, H.C. (1958). The chemist`s most creative year`s. Science,127(23),\r\n1213-1222.\r\nLehman, H.C. (1966). The age decrement in scientific creativity. American\r\nPsychologist,15,128-134.\r\nLevin, S.G. & Stephan. (1989). Age and research prodvctivity of academic\r\nscientists. Research in Higher Fducation,30(5) ,531-549.\r\nLodahl, J .B. & Gordan, B. (1972). The structure of scientific field and\r\nfunaioning of university graduate depertments. American Sociological\r\nReview,37,57-72.\r\nLong, J.S (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific\r\ncareer. American Sociological Review,43,889-908.\r\nLong, J ,S. , Allison, P, D. & McGinnis, R. ( 1979). Entrance into the academic\r\ncareer. American Sociological Review,44,816-831.\r\nLong, J.S. & McGinnis, R. (1981). Organization context on scientific productivity.\r\nAmerican Sociological Review,46,422-442.\r\nMacRoberts, M.H. & MacRoberts, B.R. (1982). A reevaluation of Lotka`s law\r\nof scientific productivity. &x:ial Studies of Science,12,443-450.\r\nMacRae,Jr.D. (1969). Growth and decay curves in scientific citations.\r\nAmerican Sociological Review,34,631-635.\r\nMartin, B.R. & Jrivin, J. (1983). Assesing basic research. Research policy,\r\n12(2),61-90.\r\nMcCarrey , M. W. ( 1971). Research climate and scientific accomphishment: An\r\ninterriew with Gerhard Herzberg. Studies in Research Psychology, 13,21-32.\r\nMcCormick, J .M. & Bennick, E.L. (1982). Graduate training and productivity\r\n:A look at who publish. The Journal of Politics,44,212-217.\r\nMcGinnis, R. , Allison, P,D. & Long, J, B. ( 1982). Postdoctoral training in Bioscience:\r\nAllocation and outcomes. Social Forces,60( 3),701-722.\r\nMerton, R.K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the\r\nsociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22,635-659.\r\nMerton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science,159,56-63.\r\nMiller ,A.C. & Serzan, S.L. (1984). Criteria for identifying a refered\r\njournal. Journal of Higher Education,55,673-690.\r\nOver, R. (1982). Does research productivity decline with age. Higher\r\nEducation,11,511-520.\r\nReskin (1977). Scientific productivity and the reward structure of\r\nscience. American Sociological Review ,42,491-504.\r\nSharif, M. N (1986) Measurement of technolohy for national development.\r\nTechnological Forecasting and Social Change,29,119-172.\r\nSimon, R.J. (1974). The work habits of eminent scientists. Sociology of\r\nwork and occupation,1,327-335.\r\nStern, N. ( 1978). Age and ad1ievenent in mathematic: A case-study in\r\nthe sociology of science. Social Studies of Science,18,127-140.\r\nYablonsky, A.I. (1980). On fundamental regularities of distribution\r\nof scienti?ic productivity. Scientcxretricsd,3-34.\r\nYele, W.C. (1973). One publishing or perishing: Fact or fable? The\r\nAmerican Sociologist,8,128-134.\r\nZuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific Flite. New York: Free Press.\r\nZuckerman, B. (1967). Noble laureates in science: Patterns of productivity\r\n,collaboration and authorship. American Sociologyical\r\nReview, 32,391-403.\r\nZuckerman, E. (1967). Noble laureates in science: Patterns of productivity\r\n, collaboration and authorship. American Sociologyical\r\nReview, 32, 391-403.\r\nZuckerman, E. & Merton, R.K. (1971). Patterns of evalnation in science.\r\nInstitnationalization Structure and Function of the Referee System\r\nMiner.r:a,9,66-100. (cited fron Bargen (1988)zh_TW