對被強姦者態度與歸因過程研究 | Publication | NCCU Academic Hub

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

html(534)

Publication Export

Google Scholar^TM

NCCU Library

Discovery System

Citation Infomation

No doi shows Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

Simple Record
Full Record

題名	對被強姦者態度與歸因過程研究
作者	胡崇慈
貢獻者	陳皎眉胡崇慈
日期	1986
上傳時間	5-May-2016 14:29:31 (UTC+8)
摘要	論文提要
參考文獻	參考書目\r\n汪慧瑜：內外控信念與不同增強方式在國中學生學習效果上的比較研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，民國七十二年六月。\r\n法務部犯罪問題研究中心：女性被害人之研究。民國七十四年十二月。\r\n吳靜吉：性別差異和內外控取向對語文流暢性之影響。政大學報，第卅一期，民國六十四年：頁131～139。\r\n郭為藩：中國兒童性別角色發展之研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，民國七十二年六月。\r\n孫敏華：職業婦女與家庭主婦的生活滿意度及其子女人格適應、性別刻板化與成就動機之研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。民國七十年六月。\r\n婦女雜誌：我們對強暴問題所知太少。民國七十三年十月。\r\n曾一泓：國中學生的控制信念與父母控制信念及教養方式之關係。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。民國六十五年六月。\r\n\r\nAlexander, C. S. The responsibility Victim: nurses’ Percetions of victims of rape. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1980, 21, (March): 22-33.\r\nApsler, R. & Fredman, H. Chance outcomes and the just world: A Comparison of observers and recipients. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, NO.5, 887-894.\r\nAronson, E. & Jones, C. Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, NO.3, 415-419.\r\nBalod, R., Harris, M., & Crandall, J. Relations among Phychological development, locus of control, and time orientations, The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1975, 126, 297-303.\r\nBest, D. L., Williams, J. E., Cloud, J. M., Daris, S. W., & Robertson, L. S. Development of sextrait stereotypes among young children in the Uniteds, England and Ireland, Child Development, 1977, 48, 1375-1384.\r\nBlock, J. H. Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal Perspectives, American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 512-526.\r\nBrownmiller, S. Against our will: man, woman and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1975.\r\nBurt, M. R. Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, NO.2, 217-230.\r\nCheck, J. V. P. & Malamuth, N. M. Sex-role stereo-typing and reactions to depictions of stranger versus typing and reactions to depictions of stranger resus acquaintance rape, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45, NO.2, 344-356.\r\nFederal Bureau Investigation (F. B. I.) Unifrm Crime Reports, 1976, 8.\r\nField, H. S. Attitudes toward rape: a comparative analysis of Police, rapist, crisis counselor, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, NO.2, 156-179.\r\nGoffman, E. “The Neglected situation”. American Anthropologist, 1976, 66, 2(December), 133-136.\r\nHeider, F. The Psychology of interpersonal relations, New York: Wiley, 1958.\r\nJone, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. The actor and the observer: Divergent Peception of the causes of behavior, Naw York: General learning Press, 1971.\r\nLanger, E. J. The illusion of control, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, NO.2, 311-328.\r\nLardy, D., & Aronson, E. The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on the decisions of simulated junors, Journal of Experimented Social Psychology, 1969, 5, 141-152.\r\nKatz, S. & Mazur, M. A. Understanding the rape victim: a synthesis of research findings. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.\r\nLerner, M. J. Evaluation of performance as a function of Performer reward and attractiveness, Journal of Personality and Soaial Psychology, 1965, 1, 355-360.\r\nLerner, M. J. & Simmons, C. H. Observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, NO.2, 203-210.\r\nLerner, M. J. & Matthews, G. Reaction to suffering of others under indirect responsibility, Journal of Persomality and Social Psychology, 1967, 5, 319-325.\r\nLerner, M. J. The desire for justice and reactions to victims. In J. Macaulay & L. Berkowitz (Eds), Altruism and helping behavior, New York: Academic, Press, 1970.\r\nLerner, M. J., Miller, D. T, & Holmes, J. G. Deserving and the emergence of justice, In Advance in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vo.9). New York: Academic Press, 1976.\r\nLerner, M.J. The justice motive: some hypothese as to its origins and forms, Journal of Personality, 1977, 45, 1-52.\r\nLerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. Just world research and the attribution Process: looking back and ahead, Psychological Bulletin, 1978, 85, NO.5, 1030-1051.\r\nMa, L. C. & Smith, K. B. Individual and social correlates of the just world belief: a study of Taiwanses college student, Psychological Reports, 1985, 57, 35-38.\r\nMalamuth, N. M. Rape Proclivity among males. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 37, NO.4, 139-157.\r\nNowicki, S. & Strickland, B. R. “A locus of control scale for children”. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 40, 148-154.\r\nPat, G. Z. Attribution theory and rape victim responsibility, Deviant Behavior, 1983, NO.4, 357-374.\r\nRonnie, J. B. Characterological verseur behavioral self-blame inquiries into depression and rape. Joural of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, NO.10, 1798-1809.\r\nRotter, J. b., “External control of reinforcement”, Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1966.\r\nRubin, Z. & Peplau, Belef in a just World and reaction to another’s lot: a study of Participants in the national draft lottery. Journal of Social Issues, 1973, 29, NO.4, 73-93.\r\nRubin, Z., & Peplau, Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31, 65-89.\r\nSanders, B. W. Rape and Woman Identity, California: Sage Publications, Inc. 1980.\r\nSanday, P. R. The Social-cultural context of rape: a Cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 1981, 37, NO.4, 5-27.\r\nSchaffe, K. F. Sex-role Issues in Mental Health, Reading, Mass: Adison-Wesley, 1980.\r\nSmith, R. E. Keating, J.P., Hester, R. K., & Mitchell, H. E. Role and justice considerations in the attribution of responsibity to a rape victim. Journal of Research In Personality, 1976, 10, 346-357.\r\nWalster, E. Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 73-79.\r\nWilson, P. R. The other side of rape Australia: University of Queenland Press, st. Lucia, 1978.\r\nWilson, K. G., & Phares, E. J. Responsibility attribution: role of outcome severity, situational ambiguity, and internal-external control, Journal of Personality, 1972, 40, 392-406.
描述	碩士國立政治大學心理學系
資料來源	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002006413
資料類型	thesis

dc.contributor.advisor	陳皎眉	zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors)	胡崇慈	zh_TW
dc.creator (作者)	胡崇慈	zh_TW
dc.date (日期)	1986	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	5-May-2016 14:29:31 (UTC+8)	-
dc.date.available	5-May-2016 14:29:31 (UTC+8)	-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間)	5-May-2016 14:29:31 (UTC+8)	-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers)	B2002006413	en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI)	https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=103418	-
dc.description (描述)	碩士	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	國立政治大學	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	心理學系	zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)	論文提要	zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents	目錄\r\n序言\r\n論文提要\r\n圖表目次\r\n第一章緒論………1\r\n第一節研積動機與目的………1\r\n第二節研究架構與假設………4\r\n第二章文獻探討………7\r\n第一節從公正世界信念看對被強姦者責難態度………7\r\n第二節從女性角色刻板印象及內外控看對被強姦者責難態度………10\r\n第三節從歸因理論看對被強姦者責難態度………13\r\n第四節關於強姦事件情境因素的有關文獻………16\r\n第三章研究方法………19\r\n第一節研究樣本………19\r\n第二節研究工具………22\r\n第三節資料分析方法………39\r\n第四章研究結果………41\r\n第一節人口統計變項與公正世界信念、女性角色刻板印象、對被強姦者接受程度及內外控的關係………41\r\n第二節公正世界信念、女性角色刻板印象及內外控與對被強姦者接受程度的關係………51\r\n第三節「對被強姦者責任歸因」與「對強姦者判刑年數」、「認為強姦者或被強姦者何者該負較大責任」的關係………59\r\n第四節強姦事件情境因素與「對被強姦者責任歸因」、「對強姦者判刑年數」、「認為強姦者或被強姦者何者該負較大責任」的關係………61\r\n第五節對被強姦者接受程度與「對被強姦者責任歸因」、「對強姦者判刑年數」、「認為強姦者與被強姦者何者該負較大責任」的關係………74\r\n第六節對被強姦者接受程度的逐步迴歸分析………76\r\n第七節各研究變項間的相關………78\r\n第五章討論與建議………81\r\n第一節個人特質與各研究變項（包括公正世界信念、女性角色刻板印象、內外控、對被強姦接受程度）的關係………81\r\n第二節對被強姦者接受程度與各研究變項的關係………83\r\n第三節強姦事件情境因素與三個效標變項（對被強姦者責任歸因、對強姦者判刑年數，認為強姦者與被強姦者何者該負較大責任」的關係………88\r\n第四節建議………92\r\n參考書目………95\r\n附錄………103\r\n\r\n\r\n圖表目次\r\n圖目錄\r\n圖1-1　本研究基本架構圖………6\r\n圖3-1　「對強姦者判刑年數」得分人數及百分比分佈圖………35\r\n圖3-2　「強姦者或被強姦者何者該負的大責任」得分人數及百分比分佈圖………36\r\n\r\n表目錄\r\n表3-1　樣本在人口統計變項之分配表………20\r\n表3-2　樣本在「被害人職業」以及「被害人是否認識強姦者」二個變項之交叉分配表………22\r\n表3-3　對被強姦者接受程度量表因素分析表………27\r\n表3-4　對被強姦者責任歸因量表因素分析表………38\r\n表4-1　人口統計變項與公正世界信念、女性角色刻板印象、對被強姦者接受程度及內外控的單因子變異數分析表………43\r\n表4-2　不同教育程度者在女性角色刻板印象上的事後比較………45\r\n表4-3　不同教育程度者在對被強姦者接受程度上的事後比較………46\r\n表4-4　不同年齡者在女性角色刻板印象上的事後比較………47\r\n表4-5　不同年齡者對被強姦者接受程度上的事後比較………48\r\n表4-6　不同年齡者在內外控上的事後比較………49\r\n表4-7　不同婚姻狀況者在對被強姦者接受程度上的事後比較………50\r\n表4-8　不同婚姻狀況者在內外控上的事後比較………51\r\n表4-9　公正世界高、低分組在對被強姦者接受程度上的t檢定結果………52\r\n表4-10　公正世界信念高、低分組在對被強姦者接受程度量表各因素的t檢定結果………53\r\n表4-11　女性角色刻板印象高、低分組在對被強姦者接受程度上的t檢定結果………55\r\n表4-12　女性角色刻板印象高、低分組在對被強姦者接受程度量表各因素的t檢定結果………56\r\n表4-13　內外控高、低分組在對被強姦者接受程度上的t檢定結果………57\r\n表4-14　內外控高、低分組在對被強姦者接受程度量表各因素的t檢定結果………58\r\n表4-15　對被強姦者責任歸因高、低分組在「對強姦者判刑年數」及「認為強姦者或被強姦者何者該負較大責任」的t檢定結果………60\r\n表4-16　各組受試者在對被強姦者責任歸因量表及歸因量表二因素之平均數與標準差………63\r\n表4-17　各組受試者在「對強姦者判刑年數」及「認為強姦者或被強姦者何者該負較大責任」之平均數及標準差………65\r\n表4-18　各組受試在對被強姦者責任歸因量表的變異數分析摘要表………66\r\n表4-19　各組受試在歸因於「壞女人」因素上的變異數分析摘要表………67\r\n表4-20　各組受試者在歸因於「行為不小心」因素上的變異數分析摘要表………69\r\n表4-21　各組受試者在「對強姦者判刑年數」的變異數分析摘要表………70\r\n表4-22　各組受試者在「對強姦者判刑年數」的單純主要效果變異數分析摘要表………72\r\n表4-23　各組受試者在「認為強姦者或被強姦者何者該負較大責任」的變異數分析摘要表………73\r\n表4-24　對被強姦者接受程度高、低分組在「對被強姦者責任歸因」、「歸因二因素」、「對強姦者判刑年數」及「認為強姦者或被強姦者何者該負較大責任」的t檢定結果………75\r\n表4-25　預測對被強姦者接受程度的逐步迴歸分析………77\r\n表4-26　各研究變相間之簡單相關………80	zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源)	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002006413	en_US
dc.title (題名)	對被強姦者態度與歸因過程研究	zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型)	thesis	en_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	參考書目\r\n汪慧瑜：內外控信念與不同增強方式在國中學生學習效果上的比較研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，民國七十二年六月。\r\n法務部犯罪問題研究中心：女性被害人之研究。民國七十四年十二月。\r\n吳靜吉：性別差異和內外控取向對語文流暢性之影響。政大學報，第卅一期，民國六十四年：頁131～139。\r\n郭為藩：中國兒童性別角色發展之研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，民國七十二年六月。\r\n孫敏華：職業婦女與家庭主婦的生活滿意度及其子女人格適應、性別刻板化與成就動機之研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。民國七十年六月。\r\n婦女雜誌：我們對強暴問題所知太少。民國七十三年十月。\r\n曾一泓：國中學生的控制信念與父母控制信念及教養方式之關係。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。民國六十五年六月。\r\n\r\nAlexander, C. S. The responsibility Victim: nurses’ Percetions of victims of rape. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1980, 21, (March): 22-33.\r\nApsler, R. & Fredman, H. Chance outcomes and the just world: A Comparison of observers and recipients. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, NO.5, 887-894.\r\nAronson, E. & Jones, C. Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, NO.3, 415-419.\r\nBalod, R., Harris, M., & Crandall, J. Relations among Phychological development, locus of control, and time orientations, The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1975, 126, 297-303.\r\nBest, D. L., Williams, J. E., Cloud, J. M., Daris, S. W., & Robertson, L. S. Development of sextrait stereotypes among young children in the Uniteds, England and Ireland, Child Development, 1977, 48, 1375-1384.\r\nBlock, J. H. Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal Perspectives, American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 512-526.\r\nBrownmiller, S. Against our will: man, woman and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1975.\r\nBurt, M. R. Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, NO.2, 217-230.\r\nCheck, J. V. P. & Malamuth, N. M. Sex-role stereo-typing and reactions to depictions of stranger versus typing and reactions to depictions of stranger resus acquaintance rape, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45, NO.2, 344-356.\r\nFederal Bureau Investigation (F. B. I.) Unifrm Crime Reports, 1976, 8.\r\nField, H. S. Attitudes toward rape: a comparative analysis of Police, rapist, crisis counselor, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, NO.2, 156-179.\r\nGoffman, E. “The Neglected situation”. American Anthropologist, 1976, 66, 2(December), 133-136.\r\nHeider, F. The Psychology of interpersonal relations, New York: Wiley, 1958.\r\nJone, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. The actor and the observer: Divergent Peception of the causes of behavior, Naw York: General learning Press, 1971.\r\nLanger, E. J. The illusion of control, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, NO.2, 311-328.\r\nLardy, D., & Aronson, E. The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on the decisions of simulated junors, Journal of Experimented Social Psychology, 1969, 5, 141-152.\r\nKatz, S. & Mazur, M. A. Understanding the rape victim: a synthesis of research findings. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.\r\nLerner, M. J. Evaluation of performance as a function of Performer reward and attractiveness, Journal of Personality and Soaial Psychology, 1965, 1, 355-360.\r\nLerner, M. J. & Simmons, C. H. Observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, NO.2, 203-210.\r\nLerner, M. J. & Matthews, G. Reaction to suffering of others under indirect responsibility, Journal of Persomality and Social Psychology, 1967, 5, 319-325.\r\nLerner, M. J. The desire for justice and reactions to victims. In J. Macaulay & L. Berkowitz (Eds), Altruism and helping behavior, New York: Academic, Press, 1970.\r\nLerner, M. J., Miller, D. T, & Holmes, J. G. Deserving and the emergence of justice, In Advance in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vo.9). New York: Academic Press, 1976.\r\nLerner, M.J. The justice motive: some hypothese as to its origins and forms, Journal of Personality, 1977, 45, 1-52.\r\nLerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. Just world research and the attribution Process: looking back and ahead, Psychological Bulletin, 1978, 85, NO.5, 1030-1051.\r\nMa, L. C. & Smith, K. B. Individual and social correlates of the just world belief: a study of Taiwanses college student, Psychological Reports, 1985, 57, 35-38.\r\nMalamuth, N. M. Rape Proclivity among males. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 37, NO.4, 139-157.\r\nNowicki, S. & Strickland, B. R. “A locus of control scale for children”. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 40, 148-154.\r\nPat, G. Z. Attribution theory and rape victim responsibility, Deviant Behavior, 1983, NO.4, 357-374.\r\nRonnie, J. B. Characterological verseur behavioral self-blame inquiries into depression and rape. Joural of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, NO.10, 1798-1809.\r\nRotter, J. b., “External control of reinforcement”, Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1966.\r\nRubin, Z. & Peplau, Belef in a just World and reaction to another’s lot: a study of Participants in the national draft lottery. Journal of Social Issues, 1973, 29, NO.4, 73-93.\r\nRubin, Z., & Peplau, Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31, 65-89.\r\nSanders, B. W. Rape and Woman Identity, California: Sage Publications, Inc. 1980.\r\nSanday, P. R. The Social-cultural context of rape: a Cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 1981, 37, NO.4, 5-27.\r\nSchaffe, K. F. Sex-role Issues in Mental Health, Reading, Mass: Adison-Wesley, 1980.\r\nSmith, R. E. Keating, J.P., Hester, R. K., & Mitchell, H. E. Role and justice considerations in the attribution of responsibity to a rape victim. Journal of Research In Personality, 1976, 10, 346-357.\r\nWalster, E. Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 73-79.\r\nWilson, P. R. The other side of rape Australia: University of Queenland Press, st. Lucia, 1978.\r\nWilson, K. G., & Phares, E. J. Responsibility attribution: role of outcome severity, situational ambiguity, and internal-external control, Journal of Personality, 1972, 40, 392-406.	zh_TW