| dc.contributor.advisor | 毛維凌 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Mao,Wei Ling | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 李佳頤 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Lee,Chia Yi | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 李佳頤 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Lee, Chia Yi | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2007 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 6-May-2016 16:54:54 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 6-May-2016 16:54:54 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 6-May-2016 16:54:54 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0094258003 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94541 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 經濟學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 94258003 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文乃探討,當預期政府的政策在未來有所改變時,民眾採適應性預期而非理性預期的學習下,經濟體系中的總體變數間究竟產生何種互動,尤其希望透過檢視利率的動態路徑來觀察期間之動態變化.在一稟賦模型及恆常所得的假設下,藉由政府調整能源稅率之議題,分別探討恆久性政策及暫時性政策下之利率路徑.透過模擬之結果得出,在適應性預期的學習下,利率波動的方向與理性預期成反向之波動變化;其次,模型也可得到,稅額改變的幅度越大,或對於能源消費所佔支出比例越高,經濟體系受到的波動幅度也越大之結果.納入生產部門並放寬稟賦條件後,若考量要素替代性對於家計單位所得報酬之影響,則兩部門的能源使用量關係方向未定,可能為正,亦可能為負.因此,政府提高能源稅,不一定能降低經濟體系能源的使用量. | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 1.研究目的與動機 12.文獻回顧 23.模型初設 54.模型之修正 95.模擬之結果與分析 236.結論 29參考文獻 30附錄 31 | zh_TW |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094258003 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 適應性預期 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 理性預期 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 能源稅 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 財政政策 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | 適應性預期之財政政策-以能源稅為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Fiscal Policy with Adaptive Expectation-Taking Energy Tax as an Example | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. Benhabib, J. and R. Farmer 〈1994〉 ""Indeterminacy and increasing returns,`` Journal of Economic Theory, 63, pp.19-412. Brett, C. and M. Keen〈2000〉 ""Political uncertainty and the earmarking of environmental taxes,`` Journal of Regulatory Economics vol.8, pp.33-443. Evans, G. W., S. Honkapohja, and K. Mitra〈2007〉 Anticipated fiscal policy and adaptive learning. Cambridge Working papers in Economics, 07054. Hoel, M.〈1996〉 ""Should a carbon tax be different across sectors?`` Journal of Public Economics, vol.59, pp.17-325. Marsiliani, L. and T. I. Renstrom 〈2000〉 ""Time inconsistency in environmental policy: Tax earmarking as a commitment solution,`` Economic Journal, vol.110, C123-C138.6. Miguel, C. d. and B. Manzano〈2001〉 Optimal oil taxation in a small open economy. Script7. Nahuis, R. and P. J. G. Tang〈2005〉 Environmental policy competition and differential tax treatment: A case for tighter coordination.CPB Discussion Paper, No.508. Richer, W. F. and K. Schneider〈2003〉 ""Energy taxation: Reasons for discriminating in favor of the production sector,`` European Economic Review, vol.47, pp.462-4769. Rietveld, P. and S. Woudenberg〈2005〉 ""Why fuel prices differ,`` Energy Economics, vol.27, pp.79-9210. Smulders, S. and R. Gradus〈1996〉 ""Pollution abatement and long-term growth,`` European Journal of Political Economy, vol.12, pp.505-53211. Sugiyama, Y.〈2006〉 The transfer of pollution abatement technology and the environment. Discussion paper series, No.14812. Yi, W.〈2006〉 Oil dependence and economic instability. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series, 2006-060A | zh_TW |
