1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 地理鄰近性與生產研發網絡之研究-以新竹工業地域為對象
作者 呂明勳
貢獻者 邊泰明
呂明勳
關鍵詞 地理鄰近性
生產網絡
研發合作網絡
日期 2009
上傳時間 9-May-2016 13:23:35 (UTC+8)
摘要 傳統產業區位理論主要在探討人類活動對空間之影響，其所著重者乃為經濟面之分析觀點，相較於傳統產業區位理論，網絡發展理論更加著重產業發展非經濟因素之探討以及網絡體系在空間結構中之建構與快速交流、互動，故近年來，產業網絡之研究受到台灣學術界的甚多重視，眾多研究指出，健全且緊密聯結的產業合作網絡，為台灣廠商國際競爭力的重要來源。而新竹科學工業園區與新竹工業區在政府政策的推動下，已引導出各自不同的產業群聚現象，並賦予其特有的任務與角色，尤其二工業（園）區距離僅約10公里，在空間上已具有鄰近性的特質，故本文主要是從廠商地理鄰近性的觀點，探討在新竹地域此一生產環境下，新竹科學工業園區與新竹工業區廠商之原料購買與產品銷售關係向外伸展的生產網絡，其地理空間結構分布情形，以及二者上下游廠商生產、研發合作網絡之連結關係，及其是否因地理鄰近性而產生影響。
     
     　　本研究首先藉文獻回顧以瞭解產業生產網絡之特性與型態，以及地理集中現象對於產業群聚及廠商間的互動，具有之衝擊與影響；並針對新竹工業地域之發展情形、產業結構之轉變以及新竹科學工業園區、新竹工業區二大產業聚集地內各項重大產業之網絡連結情形作進一步之探討。再配合問卷調查方式，以得出二工業（園）區廠商生產、研發合作網絡之連結關係與區位選擇考量情形；最後運用二元羅吉特迴歸模式逐步篩選擷取出影響廠商選擇設廠於新竹科學工業園區及新竹工業區之重要變項，並進而分析論述地理鄰近性與生產、研發網絡二者之關係。
     
      本研究實證分析結果如下：一、地理鄰近性與廠商區位之選擇有關；二、新竹科學工業園區呈現跨國界性的生產網絡關係，而新竹工業區則屬於跨區域性之生產網絡；三、新竹科學工業園區內廠商在上下游投入產出關係中是較為密切，這也正是其吸引六大產業廠商在此群聚之原因，同時促使產業群聚現象亦愈為顯著；四、地理空間的鄰近促使互動的限制隨著鄰近性的增加而減少，同時也增加了成員間溝通的速度，故在新竹工業地域產業群聚的環境下，地理的鄰近對新竹科學工業園區及新竹工業區廠商生產網絡之連結建立了更佳的平台；五、地理鄰近對工業(園)區廠商研發合作網絡之形構助益不大，而產業型態之不同，應是彼此合作網絡連結簿弱之主因。
     
      最後建議政府在規劃整體工業(園)區環境時，尤應因應產業性質之不同，提供廠商資訊交流平台，以增進產業交流。同時應協助工業(園)區廠商建立垂直、水平或異業間研發合作網絡關係，俾使彼此互享生存資源並有效降低研發成本與風險，而新產品或技術創新之時間也得以縮短，相互合作進而提升產業競爭能力。此外，日後工業(園)區服務中心除了收取經費或場地租借外，亦應兼具訊息交流功能，並從生產鏈或價值鏈之觀點，尋覓適合之廠商進駐，以活化工業(園)區產業群聚效益，進而促進彼此生產或研發合作網絡連結關係。
The industry location theory mainly discusses the impact of human activities on space from mainly the economic perspective. Compared with this conventional theory, the network development theory puts a stronger emphasis on the non-economic factors in industrial development and a network system’s construction, development, and interaction in a spatial structure. In recent years, much academic attention has been paid to the study of industrial networks in Taiwan. Many studies have pointed out that a firm and closely-linked network of industrial cooperation is the main source of international competitiveness for Taiwanese firms. Under the promotion of the government, industrial clusters have been created in Hsinchu Science Park and Hsinchu Industrial Park, with each cluster given a specific role and missions. As the two parks are only 10km away from each other, they can be said to have the characteristic of geographic proximity. Therefore, this study was aimed to investigate, from the perspective of geographic proximity, the geographic structure of the production network developed under the demand for raw materials and sales of products among the firms in the two parks. Besides, it further probed into the linkage in production and R&D among upstream/downstream firms in the two parks as well as the impact of geographic proximity on inter-firm cooperation.
     
     　　Literature review was first conducted to understand the features and patterns of production networks and the impact of geographic concentration on industrial clustering and firm interactions. Geographic development, transformation of structure of industries in Hsinchu and the networks formed by major industries in the two parks were further investigated. Through a questionnaire survey, the linkages in production and R&D among firms in the two parks and factors considered in their location choice were explored. Finally, variables affecting firms’ location choice were progressively extracted using the binary logit model. Based on these variables, the relationship between geographic proximity and production and R&D networks were further analyzed.
     
      From this empirical analysis, the following results were obtained: (1) Geographic proximity is correlated with location choice of firms. (2) The production networks in the Hsinchu Science Park are cross-national, while those in Hsinchu Industrial Park are more cross-regional. (3) Upstream/downstream firms in Hsinchu Science Park have a closer input-output relationship, which is the main reason why firms across six industries cluster in this park and industrial clustering is becoming more significant. (4) Proximity in geographic space reduces constraints on firm interactions and facilitates communications among members. Thus, in Hsinchu where industries cluster, geographic proximity provides a better platform for firms in the both parks to establish production networks. (5) The positive effect of geographic proximity on the buildup of an R&D network among firms in the two parks is limited. Difference in industry patterns is probably the main cause of the weakness of their cooperation linkages.
     
      Finally, the following suggestions were proposed: In the planning of an industrial park, the government should provide a firm information exchange platform according to properties of each industry to facilitate industry exchange. Besides, efforts should be made to assist firms in the park to establish horizontal, vertical or cross-industry R&D networks, so that these firms can share resources of survival and effectively reduce R&D cost and risks. Besides, through cooperation, their new product development or technical innovation time can be shortened and their competitiveness can be enhanced. In the future, in addition to collection of funds or administration of lands, the park service center should also provide information exchange services. From the perspective of production chain or value chain, it can proactively seek suitable firms to move into the park. Thus, the effect of industrial clustering can be increased, and production or R&D network linkages among firms can be further strengthened.
參考文獻 1.丁崑健撰，林滿紅編纂、張永堂總編纂，1995，『新竹市志．卷四經濟志(下)』，新竹：新竹市政府。
     2.王緝慈，2001，『創新的空間：企業群聚與區域發展』，北京：北京大學出版社。
     3.王俊堯，2002，「高科技產業地方生產網絡之研究－以新竹科學工業園區為例」，私立中華大學建築與都市計畫研究所碩士論文：新竹。
     4.方世杰、邱志芳，2002，「知識創新環境改善之研究-社會資本觀點」，『科技發展政策報導』，9110：746-755。
     5.尹良，1995，「國家機器與台灣石化業的發展」，『台灣社會研究季刊』。
     6.田喬治，2004，「長江三角洲區域發展：區域創新系統的觀點」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文：台北。
     7.孔憲法，1998，『新竹科學園區產業結構變遷與影響之探討』，台北:行政院國家科學委員會專案研究計畫報告。
     8.司徒達賢，2001，『策略管理新論-觀念架構與分析方法』，台北：智勝出版社。
     9.阮呂琦，2001，「生產網絡與社會紋理之闗係－以台北地區金屬模具產業為例」，國立台北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台北。
     10.吳思華，1994，「產業經理與產業合作網路體系」，『台灣經濟研究月刊』，17(10)：21-23。
     11.吳思華，1999，『台灣積體電路產業的動態網絡』，台北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
     12.吳思華，2000，『策略九說-策略思考的本質』3版，台北：臉譜文化出版股份有限公司。
     13.吳穎飛，1994，「網路基本觀念之探討」，『台灣經濟研究月刊』，17(10)：17-20。
     14.金家禾，1998，『都會中心專業化與分散化之研究（I）－臺北都會區』，台北：行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
     15.李小建，1999，『經濟地理學』，北京：高等教育出版社。
     16.李明軒、邱如美合譯，2001，『國家競爭優勢』，台北：天下文化出版社。
     17.林士群，2000，「產業網絡之發展與空間替代之研究－以新竹地區半導體產業為例」，國立台北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台北。
     18.林保全，1994，「台灣積體電路工業策略聯盟趨勢分析之研究」，國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文：新竹。
     19.周志龍，2002，『全球化、知識與區域』，台北:詹氏書局。
     20.邱程瑋，2001，「台南科學園區周遭相關產業分析」，第五屆國土規劃論壇，國立成功大學：台南。
     21.范乾峰，1998，「經濟全球化發展下台灣跨國性經濟空間網絡之研究－貿易流與商品鏈的網絡分析」，國立中興大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台北。
     22.高孔廉、王約成，1993，「台灣中小企業合作經營可行性之研究」，『台灣銀行季刊』，19(3)：26-35。
     23.高士欽，1999，「生產網絡與學習型區域 ─台中工具機產業轉型分析，私立東海大學社會學研究所博士論文：台中。
     24.高大仁，1996，「台灣加工出口區與新竹科學園區開發經驗之比較研究」，國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文：台北。
     25.財團法人中衛發展中心，1994，『建立中心衛星工廠制度計畫五年成果特輯』，台北：財團法人中衛發展中心。
     26.孫智麗，2004，「扶植下一波主流產業－台灣生技廠商之創新型態與成效」，『台灣經濟研究月刊』，27(2)：37-48。
     27.夏鑄九、王志弘等譯，1998，『網絡社會之崛起』，台北：唐山出版社。
     28.陳東升、周素卿，1996，「產業組織的網絡關係與空間結構」，國立台灣大學社會學系，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告：台北。
     29.陳柳均，2001，「高枓技的想像：新竹科學園區與地方發展」，國立台灣師範大學地理研究所碩士論文：台北。
     30.陳玟君，2001，「群聚觀點下的產業空間分布之研究－以電子產業為例」，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
     31.陳介玄，1994，『協力網絡與生活結構：台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析』，台北：聯經出版社。
     32.陳東升，2003，『積體網絡：台灣高科技產業的社會學分析』，台北：聯經出版社。
     33.陳東升，1996，「積體電路產業組織網絡的形式及其形成的制度基礎」，東亞經濟管理與彈性生產國際學術研討會，新竹。
     34.陳介玄，1998，『台灣產業的社會學研究：轉型中的中小企業』，台北：聯經出版社。
     35.陳國川，1988，「新竹市非農業活動的性質與分布」，『師大地理研究報告』，14：123-164。
     36.陳美岑譯，1996，『全球化競爭優勢』，台北：商周出版社。
     
     37.黃介振，1997，「高科技工業區對區域發展的影響－以新竹枓學園區為例」，私立文化大學地學研究所碩士論文：台北。
     38.黃仁德、姜樹翰，2001，「我國生物科技產業的展望和區位的選擇」，『經濟情述暨評論季刊』，7(1)：20-29。
     39.項美英，2003，「台商赴大陸投資之產業網絡研究－鑲嵌觀點之分析」，國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士論文：花蓮。
     40.曾紀幸，1996，「多國籍企業在台子公司網路組織型態及其母公司管理機制選擇之關係」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文：台北。
     41.張苙雲、譚康榮，1999，『形構產業網絡』，台北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
     42.彭蕙仙、常雲鳳譯，1999，『區域優勢─矽谷與128公路的文化與競爭』，台北：天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
     43.葉匡時，1994，「產業網絡攸關中小企業的明天」，『台灣經濟研究月刊』，17(10)：24-27。
     44.新竹科學工業園區管理局，2000，『新竹科學工業園區簡介』，新竹：竹科管理局。
     45.新竹縣政府，2000，『新竹縣綜合發展計畫』，新竹:新竹縣政府。
     46.楊友仁，1998，「從新竹到台南:科學園區、新興工業與地方發展的政治經濟學」，國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文：台北。
     47.楊友仁，1999，「全球經濟中的區域再結構:新竹新工業空間與區域發展的個案研究」，『城市與設計學報』。
     48.蓋文啟，2002，『創新網絡－區域經濟發展新思維』，北京：北京大學出版社。
     49.解鴻年、胡太山、柯大鈞、薛卜賓，2005，「新竹科學園區周邊工業區發展變遷之研究」，『環境與世界』，11:1-31。
     50.趙蕙鈴，1993，「台灣中小型工廠協力生產網絡之關係內容分析－彰化縣和美地區紡織工業之個案研究」，國立東海大學社會研究所碩士論文：台中。
     51.鄭恩仁，1996，「高科技產業群聚現象與共生關係之研究」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文：台北。
     52.閻永祺，2004，「產業聚集與區域產業發展關係之研究」，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台南。
     53.蕭若杏，2004，「學習區域觀念下之創新學習現象差異分析：以工具機產業為例」，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台南。
     54.蘇錦夥、李仁芳，1995，『生產合作網絡的整合建構是台灣產業競爭力的基礎，合作優勢』，台北：財團法人中衛發展中心。
     55.蕭峰雄，1994，『我國產業政策與產業發展』，台北：遠東經濟研究社。
     56.魏克儒，2002，「創新與空間－產研地理鄰近性之探討」，國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文：台北。
     57.羅於陵、廖盈琪、蔡旻樺、梁家榮，2003，『台灣產業集群－發展及創新能力分析』，第一輯產業集群演進，台北：科資中心。
     
     1.Adam,J.D.,2002,“Comparative location of academic and industrial spillovers”,Journal of Economic Geography,2:253-278.
     2.Arundel,A.and Geuna,A.,2001,“Does Proximity Matter For Knowledge Transfer from Public Institutes and Universities to Firms?”,Science and Technology Policy Research,Electronic Working Paper Series,73.
     3.Audretsch,D.B.and Feldman,M.P.,1996,“R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production”,The American Economic Review, 86(3):630-640.
     4.Atherton,A.,2003,“Examining clusters formation from the‘botton-up’: an analysis of four cases in the North of England”,Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy,21: 21-35.
     5.Albino,V.,Garavelli,C.and Schiuma,G.,1999,“Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts: the role of the leader firm”,Technovation,19: 53-63.
     6.Albino,V.,Carbonara,N.and Giannoccaro,I.,2006,“Innovation in industrial districts: an agent-based simulation model”, International Journal of Production Economics, 104: 30-45.
     7.Aldrich,J.and Nelson,F.D.,1984,“ Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models”,Newbury Park,CA:Sage Publications.
     8.Becattini,G.,1990,“The Marshallian industrial district as a socioeconomic notion”,International Institute for Labor Studies.
     9.Belussi,F.and Pilotti,L.,2002,“Knowledge creation,learning and innovation in Italian industrial districts”, Geografiska Annaler, 84 B(2): 125-139.
     10.Buck,D.,2000,“Growth,disintegration,and decentralization the construction of Taiwans industrial networks”,Environment and Planning ,32：245-262.
     11.Boari,C.and Lipparini,A.,1999,“Network within Industrial Districts:Organising Knowledge Creation and Transfer by Mean of Moderate Hierarchies”,Journal of Management & Governance,3:339-360.
     12.Boschma,R.A.,2005,“Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment”,Regional Studies,39（1）：61-74.
     13.Boschma, R. and Lambooy, J., 2002,“Knowledge, market structure, and economic coordination: dynamics of industrial districts”, Growth and Change, 33: 291-311.
     14.Cainelli, G. and De Liso, N.,2005,“Innovation in industrial districts: evidence from Italy”,Industry and Innovation,12(3): 383-398.
     15.Chetty S.and Holm D.B.,2000,“Internationalisation of small to medium-sized manufacturing firms: a network approach”,International Business Review,9：77-93.
     16.Chen,S.H.,2002,“Global Production Networks And Information Technology:The Case Of Taiwan”,Idustry and Innovation，9(3)，249-265.
     17.Coenen,L.,Moodysson,J.,Asheim,B.T.and Jonsson,O.,2003,“The Role of Proximities for Knowledge Dynamics in a Cross-border Region:Biotechnology in resund”，Druid Summer Conference 2003 on Creating, Sharing and Transferring Knowledge,Copenhagen,June,12-14.
     18.Crouch,C.,F and Farrell,H.,2001,“Great Britain: falling through the holes in the network concept. In C. Crouch, P. Le Gales, C Trogilia, and H. Voelzkow(eds). Local Production System in Europe: Rise or Demise?” Oxford University Press: Oxford。
     19.Cooke,P.and Morgan,K.,1998,“The Associational Economy” Oxford University, Oxford.
     20.Doloreux,D.,2002,“What we should know about regional systems of innovation”,Technology In Society, 24:243-263.
     21.Evangelista,R.,Iammarino,S.,Mastrostefano,V.and Silvani,A.,2002, “Looking for regional systems of innovation: evidence from the Italian innovation survey”,Regional Studies,36(2): 173-186.
     22.Fester,E.J.and Bergman,E.M.,2000,“National Industry Cluster Templates：A Framework for Applied Regional Cluster Analysis”, Regional Studies,34(3)：1-19.
     23.Feldman,M.,1994,“The Geography of Innovation”Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
     24.Foss,N.J.,1999,“Networks,capabilities,and competitive advantage”,Scandinavian Journal of Management1,5(1)：1-15.
     25.Grando,A.and Belvedere,V.,2006,“District’s manufacturing performances: a comparison among large, small-to-medium-sized and district enterprises”,International journal of Production Economics,104: 85-99.
     26.Greene,W.H.,2002,“Limdep Version 8.0”,Econometric Software Inc., Australia.
     27.Harrison, B.,1992,“Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles”, Regional Studies, 26(5): 469-483.
     28.Haruhiko Higashi,1995,“The Technologies in Japan:Its Past and its Future”,Industry and Higher education,December 1995,pp,357-364.
     29.Hill,E.and Brennan,J.,2000,“A methodology for identifying the drivers of industrial clusters: the foundation of regional competitive advantage”, Economic Development Quarterly,14(1): 65-96.
     30.Hoover,E.M.,1937,“Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries,Harvard University Press，Cambridge,MA.
     31.Hall,P.,Breheny,M.,McQuaid,R.and Hart,D.(eds),1987,“ Western Sunrise : the Genesis & Growth of Britain’s Major High Tech Corridor”, Allen & Unwin: London.
     32.Howells,J.,2002,“Tacit Knowledge,Innovation and Economic Geography”,Urban Studies,39(5-6):871-884.
     33.Iacobucci,D.,2004,“Groups of small and medium-sized firms in industrial districts in Italy”,pp.128-154 in The evolution of industrial districts: changing governance, innovation and internationalisation of local capitalism in Italy, edited by Cainelli, G. and Zoboli, R., New York: Physica-Verlag.
     34.John,N.H.and Britton,2003,“Network structure of an industrial cluster:electronics in Toronto”,Environment and Planning,35: 983-1006.
     35.John,A.and Mathews,1997,“A Silicon Valley of the East:Ceating Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry”,California Management Review,39(4).
     36.Joseph,D.C.and A.M.Rugman,1993,“Business Network for International Competitiveness”,Business Quarterly,56(4)：101-107.
     37.Jaffe,A.,1989,“Real effects of academic research”, American Economic Review 79: 957-970.
     38.Jaffe,A.,M.Trajtenberg,and R.Henderson,1993,“Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations”,Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577-598.
     39.Krugman,p.,1991,“Geography and Trade.Cambridge”,Massachusetts:MIT Press.
     40.Lazerson, M. and Lorenzoni, G.,2005,“The firms that feed industrial districts: a return to the Italian source”, pp.169-198 in Clusters, networks and innovation, edited by Breschi,S. and Malerba, F., New York: Oxford university press.
     41.Lee,B.,Liu,L.and Stafford,H.,2000,“Industrial districts: measuring local linkages”,pp.87-104 in Industrial networks and proximity, edited by Green,M.and McNaughton,R.,Hampshire: Ashgate.
     42.Lundvall,B.A.,1992,“National Systems of Innovations: Towards A Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning”,Pinter Publishers.
     43.Marshall,A.,1890,“Principles of Economics :An Introductory Volume”,New York:Free Press.
     44.Markusen,A.,1996,“Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts”,Economic Geography,72: 293-313.
     45.Martin,R. and Sunley,P.,2003,“Deconstructing clusters:chaotic concept or policy panacea?”,Journal of Economic Geography(3),5-35.
     46.Maskell,P.and Malmberg,A.,1999,“localized learning and industrial competitiveness”,Cambridge Journal of Economics,23:167-185.
     47.Malmberg,A.and Maskell,P. ,2002,”The elusive concept of localization economics: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering”,Environment and Planning A, 34:429-449.
     48.Mansfield,E.,1995,“Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics and Financing”,The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1):55-65.
     49.Nuti,F.,2004,“Italian industrial districts: facts and theories”, pp.55-77 in The evolution of industrial districts: changing governance, innovation and internationalisation of local capitalism in Italy, edited by Cainelli,G.and Zoboli,R.,New York: Physica-Verlag.
     50.Gwynne,P.,1993,“Directing Technology in ASIAs Dragons”,Research- Technology Management，12-15.
     51.Porter,M.E.,1990,“The Competitive Advantage of Nations Macmillan”,London.
     52.Porter,M.E.,1998,“Clusters and the new economics of competition”,Harvard Business Review，Nov/Dec:77-90.
     53.Porter,M.E.,2000,“Location,competition,and economic development:Local clusters in a global economy”,Economic Development Quarterly 14,15-34.
     54.Patrucco,P.P.,2003,“Institutional Variety Networking & Knowledge Exchange :Communication & Innovation in the Case of the Brianza Technological District”,Regional Studies,37（2）:159-172.
     55.Rosenfeld,S.A.,1997,“Bringing business clusters into the mainstream of economic development”,European Planning Studies 5(1):3-23.
     56.Roelandt,T.J.A.and den,H.P.,1999,“Cluster analysis and cluster-based policy making in OECD countries:Introduction to the theme.In Boosting Innovation:The Cluster Approach”,OECD,Paris.
     57.Saxenian,A.,1994,“Regional Advantage. Cambridge”,Mass: Harvard University Press.
     58.Sforzi,F.,2002,“The industrial districts and the‘new’Italian economic geography”,European Planning Studies,10(4):439-447.
     59.Swann,G.M.P.,Prevezer,M. and Stout,D.,1998,“The Dynamics of Industrial Clusters:International Comparisons in Computing and Biotechnology”,Oxford:Oxford University Press.
     60.Staber,U.,2001,“The Structure of Network in Industrial Districts”,International Journal of Urban And Regional Research,25(3)，537-552.
     61.Storper,M.,1995,“The resurgence of regional economies,ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies”, European Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 3: 191-221.
     62.Tappi,D.,2003,“On the unit of analysis in the study of networks”, pp.149-170 in Cooperation, networks and institutions in regional innovation systems, edited by Fornahl, D. and Brenner, T., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
     63.Verspagen,B.,andSchoenmakers,W.,2000,“The Spatial Dimension of Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: Evidence from Firm Patenting Data”, MERIT Working Papers (2000-016).
     64.Weber,1929,“ A Theory of the Location of Industries”, J. Friendrich, Chicago: Chicago Univisity Press.
     65.Walcott,S.,2002,“Chinese industrial and science parks: bridging the gap”,Professional Geographer ,54：349-364.
     66.Zucker,L.G.,Darby,M.R. and Brewer,M.,1998,“Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises”,American Economic Review 88(1)：290-306.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系
92923014
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092923014
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 邊泰明zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 呂明勳zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 呂明勳zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-May-2016 13:23:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-May-2016 13:23:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-May-2016 13:23:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0092923014en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94896-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 地政學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92923014zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 傳統產業區位理論主要在探討人類活動對空間之影響，其所著重者乃為經濟面之分析觀點，相較於傳統產業區位理論，網絡發展理論更加著重產業發展非經濟因素之探討以及網絡體系在空間結構中之建構與快速交流、互動，故近年來，產業網絡之研究受到台灣學術界的甚多重視，眾多研究指出，健全且緊密聯結的產業合作網絡，為台灣廠商國際競爭力的重要來源。而新竹科學工業園區與新竹工業區在政府政策的推動下，已引導出各自不同的產業群聚現象，並賦予其特有的任務與角色，尤其二工業（園）區距離僅約10公里，在空間上已具有鄰近性的特質，故本文主要是從廠商地理鄰近性的觀點，探討在新竹地域此一生產環境下，新竹科學工業園區與新竹工業區廠商之原料購買與產品銷售關係向外伸展的生產網絡，其地理空間結構分布情形，以及二者上下游廠商生產、研發合作網絡之連結關係，及其是否因地理鄰近性而產生影響。
     
     　　本研究首先藉文獻回顧以瞭解產業生產網絡之特性與型態，以及地理集中現象對於產業群聚及廠商間的互動，具有之衝擊與影響；並針對新竹工業地域之發展情形、產業結構之轉變以及新竹科學工業園區、新竹工業區二大產業聚集地內各項重大產業之網絡連結情形作進一步之探討。再配合問卷調查方式，以得出二工業（園）區廠商生產、研發合作網絡之連結關係與區位選擇考量情形；最後運用二元羅吉特迴歸模式逐步篩選擷取出影響廠商選擇設廠於新竹科學工業園區及新竹工業區之重要變項，並進而分析論述地理鄰近性與生產、研發網絡二者之關係。
     
      本研究實證分析結果如下：一、地理鄰近性與廠商區位之選擇有關；二、新竹科學工業園區呈現跨國界性的生產網絡關係，而新竹工業區則屬於跨區域性之生產網絡；三、新竹科學工業園區內廠商在上下游投入產出關係中是較為密切，這也正是其吸引六大產業廠商在此群聚之原因，同時促使產業群聚現象亦愈為顯著；四、地理空間的鄰近促使互動的限制隨著鄰近性的增加而減少，同時也增加了成員間溝通的速度，故在新竹工業地域產業群聚的環境下，地理的鄰近對新竹科學工業園區及新竹工業區廠商生產網絡之連結建立了更佳的平台；五、地理鄰近對工業(園)區廠商研發合作網絡之形構助益不大，而產業型態之不同，應是彼此合作網絡連結簿弱之主因。
     
      最後建議政府在規劃整體工業(園)區環境時，尤應因應產業性質之不同，提供廠商資訊交流平台，以增進產業交流。同時應協助工業(園)區廠商建立垂直、水平或異業間研發合作網絡關係，俾使彼此互享生存資源並有效降低研發成本與風險，而新產品或技術創新之時間也得以縮短，相互合作進而提升產業競爭能力。此外，日後工業(園)區服務中心除了收取經費或場地租借外，亦應兼具訊息交流功能，並從生產鏈或價值鏈之觀點，尋覓適合之廠商進駐，以活化工業(園)區產業群聚效益，進而促進彼此生產或研發合作網絡連結關係。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The industry location theory mainly discusses the impact of human activities on space from mainly the economic perspective. Compared with this conventional theory, the network development theory puts a stronger emphasis on the non-economic factors in industrial development and a network system’s construction, development, and interaction in a spatial structure. In recent years, much academic attention has been paid to the study of industrial networks in Taiwan. Many studies have pointed out that a firm and closely-linked network of industrial cooperation is the main source of international competitiveness for Taiwanese firms. Under the promotion of the government, industrial clusters have been created in Hsinchu Science Park and Hsinchu Industrial Park, with each cluster given a specific role and missions. As the two parks are only 10km away from each other, they can be said to have the characteristic of geographic proximity. Therefore, this study was aimed to investigate, from the perspective of geographic proximity, the geographic structure of the production network developed under the demand for raw materials and sales of products among the firms in the two parks. Besides, it further probed into the linkage in production and R&D among upstream/downstream firms in the two parks as well as the impact of geographic proximity on inter-firm cooperation.
     
     　　Literature review was first conducted to understand the features and patterns of production networks and the impact of geographic concentration on industrial clustering and firm interactions. Geographic development, transformation of structure of industries in Hsinchu and the networks formed by major industries in the two parks were further investigated. Through a questionnaire survey, the linkages in production and R&D among firms in the two parks and factors considered in their location choice were explored. Finally, variables affecting firms’ location choice were progressively extracted using the binary logit model. Based on these variables, the relationship between geographic proximity and production and R&D networks were further analyzed.
     
      From this empirical analysis, the following results were obtained: (1) Geographic proximity is correlated with location choice of firms. (2) The production networks in the Hsinchu Science Park are cross-national, while those in Hsinchu Industrial Park are more cross-regional. (3) Upstream/downstream firms in Hsinchu Science Park have a closer input-output relationship, which is the main reason why firms across six industries cluster in this park and industrial clustering is becoming more significant. (4) Proximity in geographic space reduces constraints on firm interactions and facilitates communications among members. Thus, in Hsinchu where industries cluster, geographic proximity provides a better platform for firms in the both parks to establish production networks. (5) The positive effect of geographic proximity on the buildup of an R&D network among firms in the two parks is limited. Difference in industry patterns is probably the main cause of the weakness of their cooperation linkages.
     
      Finally, the following suggestions were proposed: In the planning of an industrial park, the government should provide a firm information exchange platform according to properties of each industry to facilitate industry exchange. Besides, efforts should be made to assist firms in the park to establish horizontal, vertical or cross-industry R&D networks, so that these firms can share resources of survival and effectively reduce R&D cost and risks. Besides, through cooperation, their new product development or technical innovation time can be shortened and their competitiveness can be enhanced. In the future, in addition to collection of funds or administration of lands, the park service center should also provide information exchange services. From the perspective of production chain or value chain, it can proactively seek suitable firms to move into the park. Thus, the effect of industrial clustering can be increased, and production or R&D network linkages among firms can be further strengthened.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
     第一節 研究動機與目的 1
     第二節 研究內容與範圍 4
     第三節 研究方法與流程 6
     
     第二章 文獻回顧與理論基礎 8
     第一節 產業群聚相關理論 8
     第二節 地理鄰近性相關理論 15
     第三節 產業網絡發展相關理論與文獻 18
     第四節 工業地域相關理論 24
     第五節 小結 28
     
     第三章 新竹工業地域發展與產業結構 29
     第一節 新竹工業地域之發展 29
     第二節 新竹工業地域之產業結構 36
     第三節 新竹工業地域產業網絡分析 46
     
     第四章 研究設計及問卷調查 57
     第一節 研究設計 57
     第二節 問卷設計 61
     第三節 問卷調查 63
     第四節 問卷調查結果分析 65
     
     第五章 實證分析 70
     第一節 新竹科學工業園區與新竹工業區廠商區位選擇分析 70
     第二節 新竹科學工業園區與新竹工業區廠商生產網絡分析 75
     第三節 新竹科學工業園區與新竹工業區廠商研發合作網絡分析 90
     第四節 實證結果分析 94
     
     第六章 結論與建議 99
     第一節 研究結論 99
     第二節 後續研究建議 102
     參考文獻 104		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092923014en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 地理鄰近性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 生產網絡zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 研發合作網絡zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 地理鄰近性與生產研發網絡之研究-以新竹工業地域為對象zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.丁崑健撰，林滿紅編纂、張永堂總編纂，1995，『新竹市志．卷四經濟志(下)』，新竹：新竹市政府。
     2.王緝慈，2001，『創新的空間：企業群聚與區域發展』，北京：北京大學出版社。
     3.王俊堯，2002，「高科技產業地方生產網絡之研究－以新竹科學工業園區為例」，私立中華大學建築與都市計畫研究所碩士論文：新竹。
     4.方世杰、邱志芳，2002，「知識創新環境改善之研究-社會資本觀點」，『科技發展政策報導』，9110：746-755。
     5.尹良，1995，「國家機器與台灣石化業的發展」，『台灣社會研究季刊』。
     6.田喬治，2004，「長江三角洲區域發展：區域創新系統的觀點」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文：台北。
     7.孔憲法，1998，『新竹科學園區產業結構變遷與影響之探討』，台北:行政院國家科學委員會專案研究計畫報告。
     8.司徒達賢，2001，『策略管理新論-觀念架構與分析方法』，台北：智勝出版社。
     9.阮呂琦，2001，「生產網絡與社會紋理之闗係－以台北地區金屬模具產業為例」，國立台北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台北。
     10.吳思華，1994，「產業經理與產業合作網路體系」，『台灣經濟研究月刊』，17(10)：21-23。
     11.吳思華，1999，『台灣積體電路產業的動態網絡』，台北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
     12.吳思華，2000，『策略九說-策略思考的本質』3版，台北：臉譜文化出版股份有限公司。
     13.吳穎飛，1994，「網路基本觀念之探討」，『台灣經濟研究月刊』，17(10)：17-20。
     14.金家禾，1998，『都會中心專業化與分散化之研究（I）－臺北都會區』，台北：行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
     15.李小建，1999，『經濟地理學』，北京：高等教育出版社。
     16.李明軒、邱如美合譯，2001，『國家競爭優勢』，台北：天下文化出版社。
     17.林士群，2000，「產業網絡之發展與空間替代之研究－以新竹地區半導體產業為例」，國立台北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台北。
     18.林保全，1994，「台灣積體電路工業策略聯盟趨勢分析之研究」，國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文：新竹。
     19.周志龍，2002，『全球化、知識與區域』，台北:詹氏書局。
     20.邱程瑋，2001，「台南科學園區周遭相關產業分析」，第五屆國土規劃論壇，國立成功大學：台南。
     21.范乾峰，1998，「經濟全球化發展下台灣跨國性經濟空間網絡之研究－貿易流與商品鏈的網絡分析」，國立中興大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台北。
     22.高孔廉、王約成，1993，「台灣中小企業合作經營可行性之研究」，『台灣銀行季刊』，19(3)：26-35。
     23.高士欽，1999，「生產網絡與學習型區域 ─台中工具機產業轉型分析，私立東海大學社會學研究所博士論文：台中。
     24.高大仁，1996，「台灣加工出口區與新竹科學園區開發經驗之比較研究」，國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文：台北。
     25.財團法人中衛發展中心，1994，『建立中心衛星工廠制度計畫五年成果特輯』，台北：財團法人中衛發展中心。
     26.孫智麗，2004，「扶植下一波主流產業－台灣生技廠商之創新型態與成效」，『台灣經濟研究月刊』，27(2)：37-48。
     27.夏鑄九、王志弘等譯，1998，『網絡社會之崛起』，台北：唐山出版社。
     28.陳東升、周素卿，1996，「產業組織的網絡關係與空間結構」，國立台灣大學社會學系，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告：台北。
     29.陳柳均，2001，「高枓技的想像：新竹科學園區與地方發展」，國立台灣師範大學地理研究所碩士論文：台北。
     30.陳玟君，2001，「群聚觀點下的產業空間分布之研究－以電子產業為例」，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
     31.陳介玄，1994，『協力網絡與生活結構：台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析』，台北：聯經出版社。
     32.陳東升，2003，『積體網絡：台灣高科技產業的社會學分析』，台北：聯經出版社。
     33.陳東升，1996，「積體電路產業組織網絡的形式及其形成的制度基礎」，東亞經濟管理與彈性生產國際學術研討會，新竹。
     34.陳介玄，1998，『台灣產業的社會學研究：轉型中的中小企業』，台北：聯經出版社。
     35.陳國川，1988，「新竹市非農業活動的性質與分布」，『師大地理研究報告』，14：123-164。
     36.陳美岑譯，1996，『全球化競爭優勢』，台北：商周出版社。
     
     37.黃介振，1997，「高科技工業區對區域發展的影響－以新竹枓學園區為例」，私立文化大學地學研究所碩士論文：台北。
     38.黃仁德、姜樹翰，2001，「我國生物科技產業的展望和區位的選擇」，『經濟情述暨評論季刊』，7(1)：20-29。
     39.項美英，2003，「台商赴大陸投資之產業網絡研究－鑲嵌觀點之分析」，國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士論文：花蓮。
     40.曾紀幸，1996，「多國籍企業在台子公司網路組織型態及其母公司管理機制選擇之關係」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文：台北。
     41.張苙雲、譚康榮，1999，『形構產業網絡』，台北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
     42.彭蕙仙、常雲鳳譯，1999，『區域優勢─矽谷與128公路的文化與競爭』，台北：天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
     43.葉匡時，1994，「產業網絡攸關中小企業的明天」，『台灣經濟研究月刊』，17(10)：24-27。
     44.新竹科學工業園區管理局，2000，『新竹科學工業園區簡介』，新竹：竹科管理局。
     45.新竹縣政府，2000，『新竹縣綜合發展計畫』，新竹:新竹縣政府。
     46.楊友仁，1998，「從新竹到台南:科學園區、新興工業與地方發展的政治經濟學」，國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文：台北。
     47.楊友仁，1999，「全球經濟中的區域再結構:新竹新工業空間與區域發展的個案研究」，『城市與設計學報』。
     48.蓋文啟，2002，『創新網絡－區域經濟發展新思維』，北京：北京大學出版社。
     49.解鴻年、胡太山、柯大鈞、薛卜賓，2005，「新竹科學園區周邊工業區發展變遷之研究」，『環境與世界』，11:1-31。
     50.趙蕙鈴，1993，「台灣中小型工廠協力生產網絡之關係內容分析－彰化縣和美地區紡織工業之個案研究」，國立東海大學社會研究所碩士論文：台中。
     51.鄭恩仁，1996，「高科技產業群聚現象與共生關係之研究」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文：台北。
     52.閻永祺，2004，「產業聚集與區域產業發展關係之研究」，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台南。
     53.蕭若杏，2004，「學習區域觀念下之創新學習現象差異分析：以工具機產業為例」，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台南。
     54.蘇錦夥、李仁芳，1995，『生產合作網絡的整合建構是台灣產業競爭力的基礎，合作優勢』，台北：財團法人中衛發展中心。
     55.蕭峰雄，1994，『我國產業政策與產業發展』，台北：遠東經濟研究社。
     56.魏克儒，2002，「創新與空間－產研地理鄰近性之探討」，國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文：台北。
     57.羅於陵、廖盈琪、蔡旻樺、梁家榮，2003，『台灣產業集群－發展及創新能力分析』，第一輯產業集群演進，台北：科資中心。
     
     1.Adam,J.D.,2002,“Comparative location of academic and industrial spillovers”,Journal of Economic Geography,2:253-278.
     2.Arundel,A.and Geuna,A.,2001,“Does Proximity Matter For Knowledge Transfer from Public Institutes and Universities to Firms?”,Science and Technology Policy Research,Electronic Working Paper Series,73.
     3.Audretsch,D.B.and Feldman,M.P.,1996,“R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production”,The American Economic Review, 86(3):630-640.
     4.Atherton,A.,2003,“Examining clusters formation from the‘botton-up’: an analysis of four cases in the North of England”,Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy,21: 21-35.
     5.Albino,V.,Garavelli,C.and Schiuma,G.,1999,“Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts: the role of the leader firm”,Technovation,19: 53-63.
     6.Albino,V.,Carbonara,N.and Giannoccaro,I.,2006,“Innovation in industrial districts: an agent-based simulation model”, International Journal of Production Economics, 104: 30-45.
     7.Aldrich,J.and Nelson,F.D.,1984,“ Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models”,Newbury Park,CA:Sage Publications.
     8.Becattini,G.,1990,“The Marshallian industrial district as a socioeconomic notion”,International Institute for Labor Studies.
     9.Belussi,F.and Pilotti,L.,2002,“Knowledge creation,learning and innovation in Italian industrial districts”, Geografiska Annaler, 84 B(2): 125-139.
     10.Buck,D.,2000,“Growth,disintegration,and decentralization the construction of Taiwans industrial networks”,Environment and Planning ,32：245-262.
     11.Boari,C.and Lipparini,A.,1999,“Network within Industrial Districts:Organising Knowledge Creation and Transfer by Mean of Moderate Hierarchies”,Journal of Management & Governance,3:339-360.
     12.Boschma,R.A.,2005,“Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment”,Regional Studies,39（1）：61-74.
     13.Boschma, R. and Lambooy, J., 2002,“Knowledge, market structure, and economic coordination: dynamics of industrial districts”, Growth and Change, 33: 291-311.
     14.Cainelli, G. and De Liso, N.,2005,“Innovation in industrial districts: evidence from Italy”,Industry and Innovation,12(3): 383-398.
     15.Chetty S.and Holm D.B.,2000,“Internationalisation of small to medium-sized manufacturing firms: a network approach”,International Business Review,9：77-93.
     16.Chen,S.H.,2002,“Global Production Networks And Information Technology:The Case Of Taiwan”,Idustry and Innovation，9(3)，249-265.
     17.Coenen,L.,Moodysson,J.,Asheim,B.T.and Jonsson,O.,2003,“The Role of Proximities for Knowledge Dynamics in a Cross-border Region:Biotechnology in resund”，Druid Summer Conference 2003 on Creating, Sharing and Transferring Knowledge,Copenhagen,June,12-14.
     18.Crouch,C.,F and Farrell,H.,2001,“Great Britain: falling through the holes in the network concept. In C. Crouch, P. Le Gales, C Trogilia, and H. Voelzkow(eds). Local Production System in Europe: Rise or Demise?” Oxford University Press: Oxford。
     19.Cooke,P.and Morgan,K.,1998,“The Associational Economy” Oxford University, Oxford.
     20.Doloreux,D.,2002,“What we should know about regional systems of innovation”,Technology In Society, 24:243-263.
     21.Evangelista,R.,Iammarino,S.,Mastrostefano,V.and Silvani,A.,2002, “Looking for regional systems of innovation: evidence from the Italian innovation survey”,Regional Studies,36(2): 173-186.
     22.Fester,E.J.and Bergman,E.M.,2000,“National Industry Cluster Templates：A Framework for Applied Regional Cluster Analysis”, Regional Studies,34(3)：1-19.
     23.Feldman,M.,1994,“The Geography of Innovation”Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
     24.Foss,N.J.,1999,“Networks,capabilities,and competitive advantage”,Scandinavian Journal of Management1,5(1)：1-15.
     25.Grando,A.and Belvedere,V.,2006,“District’s manufacturing performances: a comparison among large, small-to-medium-sized and district enterprises”,International journal of Production Economics,104: 85-99.
     26.Greene,W.H.,2002,“Limdep Version 8.0”,Econometric Software Inc., Australia.
     27.Harrison, B.,1992,“Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles”, Regional Studies, 26(5): 469-483.
     28.Haruhiko Higashi,1995,“The Technologies in Japan:Its Past and its Future”,Industry and Higher education,December 1995,pp,357-364.
     29.Hill,E.and Brennan,J.,2000,“A methodology for identifying the drivers of industrial clusters: the foundation of regional competitive advantage”, Economic Development Quarterly,14(1): 65-96.
     30.Hoover,E.M.,1937,“Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries,Harvard University Press，Cambridge,MA.
     31.Hall,P.,Breheny,M.,McQuaid,R.and Hart,D.(eds),1987,“ Western Sunrise : the Genesis & Growth of Britain’s Major High Tech Corridor”, Allen & Unwin: London.
     32.Howells,J.,2002,“Tacit Knowledge,Innovation and Economic Geography”,Urban Studies,39(5-6):871-884.
     33.Iacobucci,D.,2004,“Groups of small and medium-sized firms in industrial districts in Italy”,pp.128-154 in The evolution of industrial districts: changing governance, innovation and internationalisation of local capitalism in Italy, edited by Cainelli, G. and Zoboli, R., New York: Physica-Verlag.
     34.John,N.H.and Britton,2003,“Network structure of an industrial cluster:electronics in Toronto”,Environment and Planning,35: 983-1006.
     35.John,A.and Mathews,1997,“A Silicon Valley of the East:Ceating Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry”,California Management Review,39(4).
     36.Joseph,D.C.and A.M.Rugman,1993,“Business Network for International Competitiveness”,Business Quarterly,56(4)：101-107.
     37.Jaffe,A.,1989,“Real effects of academic research”, American Economic Review 79: 957-970.
     38.Jaffe,A.,M.Trajtenberg,and R.Henderson,1993,“Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations”,Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577-598.
     39.Krugman,p.,1991,“Geography and Trade.Cambridge”,Massachusetts:MIT Press.
     40.Lazerson, M. and Lorenzoni, G.,2005,“The firms that feed industrial districts: a return to the Italian source”, pp.169-198 in Clusters, networks and innovation, edited by Breschi,S. and Malerba, F., New York: Oxford university press.
     41.Lee,B.,Liu,L.and Stafford,H.,2000,“Industrial districts: measuring local linkages”,pp.87-104 in Industrial networks and proximity, edited by Green,M.and McNaughton,R.,Hampshire: Ashgate.
     42.Lundvall,B.A.,1992,“National Systems of Innovations: Towards A Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning”,Pinter Publishers.
     43.Marshall,A.,1890,“Principles of Economics :An Introductory Volume”,New York:Free Press.
     44.Markusen,A.,1996,“Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts”,Economic Geography,72: 293-313.
     45.Martin,R. and Sunley,P.,2003,“Deconstructing clusters:chaotic concept or policy panacea?”,Journal of Economic Geography(3),5-35.
     46.Maskell,P.and Malmberg,A.,1999,“localized learning and industrial competitiveness”,Cambridge Journal of Economics,23:167-185.
     47.Malmberg,A.and Maskell,P. ,2002,”The elusive concept of localization economics: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering”,Environment and Planning A, 34:429-449.
     48.Mansfield,E.,1995,“Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics and Financing”,The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1):55-65.
     49.Nuti,F.,2004,“Italian industrial districts: facts and theories”, pp.55-77 in The evolution of industrial districts: changing governance, innovation and internationalisation of local capitalism in Italy, edited by Cainelli,G.and Zoboli,R.,New York: Physica-Verlag.
     50.Gwynne,P.,1993,“Directing Technology in ASIAs Dragons”,Research- Technology Management，12-15.
     51.Porter,M.E.,1990,“The Competitive Advantage of Nations Macmillan”,London.
     52.Porter,M.E.,1998,“Clusters and the new economics of competition”,Harvard Business Review，Nov/Dec:77-90.
     53.Porter,M.E.,2000,“Location,competition,and economic development:Local clusters in a global economy”,Economic Development Quarterly 14,15-34.
     54.Patrucco,P.P.,2003,“Institutional Variety Networking & Knowledge Exchange :Communication & Innovation in the Case of the Brianza Technological District”,Regional Studies,37（2）:159-172.
     55.Rosenfeld,S.A.,1997,“Bringing business clusters into the mainstream of economic development”,European Planning Studies 5(1):3-23.
     56.Roelandt,T.J.A.and den,H.P.,1999,“Cluster analysis and cluster-based policy making in OECD countries:Introduction to the theme.In Boosting Innovation:The Cluster Approach”,OECD,Paris.
     57.Saxenian,A.,1994,“Regional Advantage. Cambridge”,Mass: Harvard University Press.
     58.Sforzi,F.,2002,“The industrial districts and the‘new’Italian economic geography”,European Planning Studies,10(4):439-447.
     59.Swann,G.M.P.,Prevezer,M. and Stout,D.,1998,“The Dynamics of Industrial Clusters:International Comparisons in Computing and Biotechnology”,Oxford:Oxford University Press.
     60.Staber,U.,2001,“The Structure of Network in Industrial Districts”,International Journal of Urban And Regional Research,25(3)，537-552.
     61.Storper,M.,1995,“The resurgence of regional economies,ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies”, European Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 3: 191-221.
     62.Tappi,D.,2003,“On the unit of analysis in the study of networks”, pp.149-170 in Cooperation, networks and institutions in regional innovation systems, edited by Fornahl, D. and Brenner, T., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
     63.Verspagen,B.,andSchoenmakers,W.,2000,“The Spatial Dimension of Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: Evidence from Firm Patenting Data”, MERIT Working Papers (2000-016).
     64.Weber,1929,“ A Theory of the Location of Industries”, J. Friendrich, Chicago: Chicago Univisity Press.
     65.Walcott,S.,2002,“Chinese industrial and science parks: bridging the gap”,Professional Geographer ,54：349-364.
     66.Zucker,L.G.,Darby,M.R. and Brewer,M.,1998,“Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises”,American Economic Review 88(1)：290-306.		zh_TW