1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 閱讀、對話與遊戲：國小綜合活動課程美學之探究
作者 陳麗文
Chen, Li Wen
貢獻者 馮朝霖<br>林淑玲
陳麗文
Chen, Li Wen
關鍵詞 綜合活動學習領域
課程美學
敘事探究
integrate activity learning area
curriculum aesthetics
narrative research
日期 2008
上傳時間 9-May-2016 13:28:54 (UTC+8)
摘要 九年一貫課程「將傳統學科統整為七大學習領域」，在知識結構方面的改變，對教師的影響甚大；其中，尤以「綜合活動學習領域」的實施，最令基層教師感到困擾。研究者多年來擔任師資培育中心的教學研究發現，現行九年一貫課程「綜合活動學習領域」的實施，存在著許多問題。綜合課程強調「統整課程」及「合科教學」的部分，期能透過「綜合活動學習領域」的設置及活動過程的體驗與反思，將傳統的分科課程，統整為相互關聯的領域，並且落實學生生活能力的陶養。其若以「美學/哲學的課程取向」論述，教師可依循課程綱要，自主的規劃教學活動，學校也可採取彈性課程的方式，由生活經驗出發，讓學童探索真實生活中的經驗，學習對事物做深入的體驗、判斷與理解意義；因此，如何促使「生活中美感」與「體驗活動」產生聯結，落實學童生活能力的陶養，便成為「綜合活動課程實踐」的關鍵因素。
     本文採用敘事分析的探究途徑，針對國小「綜合活動學習領域」教師的教學實踐敘事，進行「教師自我歸因」的敘事意義創塑，強調「閱讀文本、分享對話、游移遊戲」半結構式的課程設計，一種閱讀詮釋、對話視域與遊戲體驗的課程美學探究。本研究發現：
     1、透過「教師敘事－自我歸因」的概念範疇，論述「綜合活動學習領域」課程美學之可能實踐途徑；包含：省思跨領域綜合課程的交互作用；充實學生生活使其發展完美人性；閱讀、對話與分享意念的課程實踐；課程中的主體性與情境詮釋以及一種「詮釋性反省的手法」：教師藉以覺察「師生從學習經驗中協商出的意義」，進而重新審視課程中「教育經驗的內涵及意圖」，「敘事」得以「喚醒了課程主體」，一種生命歷程、多元情境脈絡的建構過程、衝擊與協商。
     2、透過「課程實踐－教學敘事」的案例分析，探究「觀看/閱讀生活世界」課程美學之可能實踐途徑；包含：協商的、批判性的、互為文本的解讀；師生互為「觀看、傾聽、感覺和感動」；「體驗作為一種學習方式」的課程實施；「故事作為一種學習方式」的課程實施；「想像文本作為一種學習方式」的課程實施以及「詩性智慧作為一種學習方式」的課程實施：綜合活動課程藉以創造出一個「詩性的經驗、感性的融合」，使其經營出一種對話遊戲中的新經驗，由詩、遊戲、美感經驗所構成的學習課程；在學習過程中，師生得以審視「由故事、創造組成，觸及學習者感覺、同情與想像力思維、詩性的體驗和實踐的智慧」。
     3、透過「課程美學－詮釋批判」的概念範疇，探究「師生交感於美學視野」的互動過程之可能途徑；包含：詩性的、經驗內容的自我體驗和表白；在意義流動開展中解構自己的課程世界；情境互動、解構文本、賞析與視野融合；一種神話、故事、夢想與想像課程意圖；教育如何促使人們發展自己的知覺力量；如何促使人們發展美好生活的課程實踐：教師藉以審視或覺察「他們處於不斷的變化之中」，一種「主動的學習歷程，一種整體的生命經驗」，而且透過「課程的動態觀點」，所有的課程設計，都可以是一種思維過程的課程經驗，一種美好生活的「覺醒和意識」的模式。
     4、透過「課程敘事－語言流動」的分析架構，探究「生活中美感」與「體驗活動」產生聯結之途徑；包含：語言的可能性與「觀看途徑」的運作；「以學生為主體」真實生活世界的知識實踐；能將「生活世界」真實存在的主題加以關連；對話提供未完成性的關連與希望的存有覺察；教育情境的動態發展，人與豐富情境的「邂逅」：教師藉以重新審視過程中「課程片段、組成部分的反思與回饋」，一種「人與情境多樣性的檢視」，透過「自由的實踐」，質疑一切看似靜態與不易變更之社會事實，一種互動不斷演化出渾沌的、眾多不同模式的課程實踐。
Integrating the traditional disciplines into seven main learning areas according to Grade 1-9 Curriculum has imposed great impact on both knowledge structures and the instructors; especially the practice of Integrative Activities Learning really troubles the grass-roots teachers. Base on years of experience as an instructor in Teacher Education Center, I’ve found that the current implementation of Integrative Activities Learning is not easy to be executed in reality. The purpose of Integrative Activities Learning is to emphasize on integrated curriculum and all teaching aspect, and through the participation in the planned activities, students are in the mean time trained to have good life skills. When focusing on Aesthetics/Philosophy Course Orientation, not only the teachers can follow the curriculum guidelines to set the pace of the appropriate teaching plans, the schools can also adopt flexible curriculum; this will be a good way to guide the students in learning, exploring and experiencing daily events. Moreover, through the practice of Integrative Activities, students can learn to link their daily experiences with beauty of life, thus, they’re trained to own life skills.
     
     This abstract uses narrative analysis as the mean to proceed the evaluation on the effectiveness of practicing Integrative Activities Learning in elementary schools. To study the result of stressing on story reading, dialogue sharing and doing waver game – a curriculum for attaining story understanding, dialogue forming and gaming experience. This research found the following points.
     
     1.Through the concept of narrative analysis and self-attribution to realize the possible ways of implementing Integrative Activities Learning in elementary schools. Teachers can guide students to learn to appreciate beauty and moral values in the process of reading, sharing dialogues and thoughts with others and further more, developing good life skills.
     
     2.Through the concept of curriculum practice and teaching narrative to find the possible ways of practicing aesthetics curriculum in schools. Teachers can interact with students by sharing with one another about what their thoughts are in watching, listening and feeling from doing group activities. Through experimenting, reading and imagination brainstorming, Integrative Activities Learning can be a great tool to create a fun and productive learning experience for both teachers and students.
     
     3.Through the concept of curriculum aesthetics and interpretation of critical to determine the possible ways of teacher/student interaction on beauty. Teachers and students can interact through studying myths, stories and dreams; by taking the initiative to learn and share inner thoughts with others, students can cultivate an overall life experience and gain the awakening and awareness through calculated curriculum learning.
     
     4.Through the concept of curriculum narrative and language flow to find the connection between beauty of life and experience activities. Teachers can show the students the possibilities of languages usages, discuss the life themes of this living world with students and help them to examine, question and clarify the seems unchanged social facts and find the core value of their own through participating in the course.
第一章 緒 論
     第一節 研究背景 ………………………………………………………………1
     第二節 研究動機與目的 ………………………………………………………6
     
     第二章 文獻探討
     第一節 國小綜合活動課程的實施……………………………………………8
     第二節 綜合活動課程美學的可能性 ………………………………………19
     
     第三章 研究方法
     第一節 敘事分析的方法 ……………………………………………………30
     第二節 研究架構與歷程 ……………………………………………………38
     
     第四章 研究過程及資料分析
     第一節 綜合活動的教學實踐 ………………………………………………66
     第二節 對話遊戲的體驗學習 ………………………………………………88
     第三節 閱讀對話的故事模式 ……………………………………………122
     第四節 對話遊戲的想像文本………………………………………………142
     第五節 閱讀對話的詩性智慧………………………………………………193
     第六節 綜合活動的課程內涵 ……………………………………………206
     
     第五章 研究結果與討論
     第一節 賦權增能的心靈解放 ……………………………………………220
     第二節 重新理解的意義建構 ……………………………………………257
     第三節 轉化學習的行動能量 ……………………………………………290
     第四節 創造熱情的積極意向 ……………………………………………332
     
     第六章 結 論
     第一節 教育本質上是一種美學的實踐 ………………………………380
     第二節 「教師敘事/自我歸因」的課程詮釋 …………………………385
     第三節 「觀看/閱讀生活世界」課程美學之實踐………………………386
     第四節 「師生交感於美學視野」的互動途徑 ………………………387
     第五節 「生活中美感」與「體驗活動」之聯結途徑 …………………388
     第六節 閱讀詮釋、對話視域與遊戲體驗的課程美學 ………………389
     
     參考文獻……………………………………………………………………412
     圖一：綜合活動學習領域的教學內涵………………………………………9
     圖二：研究過程的再現層級…………………………………………………34
     圖三：研究架構與歷程………………………………………………………38
     圖四：研究視域之檢視………………………………………………………38
     圖五：研究方法之檢視………………………………………………………43
     圖六：研究內容之檢視………………………………………………………48
     圖七：體驗學習的迴圈過程 …… …………………………………………51
     圖八：體驗是一種學習方式的案例…………………………………………52
     圖九：故事模式………………………………………………………………53
     圖十：故事是一種學習方式的案例…………………………………………54
     圖十一：想像文本是一種學習方式的案例…………………………………57
     圖十二：詩性智慧是一種學習方式的案例…………………………………59
     圖十三：研究目的之檢視……………………………………………………60
     圖十四：綜合活動的教學實踐………………………………………………66
     圖十五：對話、遊戲的體驗學習……………………………………………88
     圖十六：閱讀、對話的故事模式……………………………………………122
     圖十七：對話、遊戲的想像文本……………………………………………142
     圖十八：閱讀、對話的詩性智慧……………………………………………193
     圖十九：綜合活動的課程內涵………………………………………………206
     圖二十：賦權增能的心靈解放………………………………………………220
     圖二十一：「對話」的體驗學習……………………………………………221
     圖二十二：「遊戲」的體驗學習……………………………………………230
     圖二十三：「賦權增能」的課程美學………………………………………192
     圖二十四：「心靈解放」的課程美學………………………………………239圖二十五：重新理解的意義建構……………………………………………257
     圖二十六：「閱讀」的故事模式……………………………………………258
     圖二十七：「對話」的故事模式……………………………………………266
     圖二十八：「重新理解」的課程美學………………………………………273
     圖二十九：「意義建構」的課程美學………………………………………281
     圖三十：轉化學習的行動能量………………………………………………290
     圖三十一：「對話」的想像文本……………………………………………291
     圖三十二：「遊戲」的想像文本……………………………………………301
     圖三十三：「轉化學習」的課程美學………………………………………310
     圖三十四：「行動能量」的課程美學………………………………………321
     圖三十五：創造熱情的積極意向……………………………………………332
     圖三十六：「閱讀」的詩性智慧……………………………………………333
     圖三十七：「對話」的詩性智慧……………………………………………344
     圖三十八：「創造熱情」的課程美學………………………………………355
     圖三十九：「積極意向」的課程美學………………………………………366
     圖四十：教育本質上是一種美學的實踐……………………………………381
     圖四十一：閱讀詮釋、對話視域與遊戲體驗的課程美學 ………………389
     圖四十二：對話視域的體驗學習 …………………………………………390
     圖四十三：閱讀詮釋的故事模式 …………………………………………396
     圖四十四：閱讀對話的想像文本 …………………………………………401
     圖四十五：遊戲體驗的詩性智慧 …………………………………………407
     表一：綜合活動階段的能力指標 ……………………………………………12
參考文獻 一、中文參考文獻：
     行政院教改審議委員會（1996）。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院。
     中共中央編譯局譯（2004）。Marx, Karl 著[1867]。論分工與工資。資本論(卷 1)。北京:人民。
     司琦（1989、1993、1997）。課程導論。台北市：五南圖書出版有限公司。
     王彩鳳（2005）。利社會行為融入國小三年級綜合活動領域教學實施成效之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文，台北。
     王麗雲譯（2002）。Apple, Michael W.（1990）。意識型態與課程。臺北：桂冠。
     王秋絨（1991）。批判教育論在我國教育實習制度規劃上的意義。台北：師大書苑。
     白春仁等譯（1998）。Bakhtin, M. M.（1929）著。陀思妥耶夫斯基的詩學問題。載於：巴赫金全集第五卷。河北省：河北教育出版社。
     白春仁等譯（1998）。Mikhail Bakhtin著。文本、對話與人文。石家庄:河北教育出版社。
     方德隆（2000）。九年一貫課程學習領域之統整。課程與教學季刊，3（1），頁1-18。
     方永泉 譯(2003)。Paulo Freire著。受壓迫者教育學。台北:巨流。
     石玉資、陳麒仁（2004）。從九年一貫課程改革角度探討教師應有專業發展。師說，179，頁36-39。
     成令方等譯（2001）。Allen G. Johnson (1997)著。見樹又見林：社會學作為一種生活、實踐與承諾。台北：群學出版社。
     江政寬譯（2002）。Peter Burke著。歷史學與社會理論。臺北：麥田出版社。
     宋文里譯（2001）。J. Bruner著。教育的文化－文化心理學觀點。台北:遠流。
     李咏吟(1998)。認知教學理論與策略。台北:心理出版社。
     余紫瑛（2000）。探索教育活動影響國中學生自我概念與人際關係之實驗研究。國立台灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
     何英奇（2001）。行思知交融的經驗學習模式在綜合活動課程上之應用。載於歐用生、莊梅枝主編：九年一貫課程學習領域研討會論文集。台北：中華民國教材研究發展學會。
     池叔華（2001）。國小低年級教師綜合活動課程的實務知識之研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，台北。
     教育部（2000）。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。
     教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要綜合活動學習領域。
     教育部（2004）。「國民教育法」。教育部公報，356，頁7-9。
     吳心怡（2002）。「教科書」。國民教育，43（2），頁79-84。
     林怡秀（1999）。國民小學課程統整模式之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
     林宏濤譯（2009）。Max Horkheimer、Theodor W. Adorno著。啟蒙的辯證。台北市:商周。
     朱元鴻(1997)。背判/洩密/出賣:論民族誌的冥界。台灣社會研究季刊，26，頁29-65。
     朱孟實譯(1981)。Georg W. F. Hegel 著。美學。台北市：里仁。
     宋文里譯（2001）。Jerome Bruner原著。教育的文化：文化心理學的觀點。臺北：遠流。
     沈清松（1996）。在主體哲學的廢墟中重估自我-呂格爾的自我詮釋學述評。載於哲學雜誌，15，頁4-43。
     沈清松（1993）。從現代到後現代。哲學雜誌，4，4-25。
     沈清松（2000）。在批判、質疑與否定之後--後現代的正面價值與視野。哲學與文化，27（8），705-716。
     沈霓（2001）。教育部長曾志朗:教師是教改成功之鑰。康軒教育雜誌，44，頁42-56。
     高新建（2002）。編輯手記。中等教育，53(6)，頁1。
     高新建等人（2003）。發展以學習者為中心的高品質中小學課程。收錄於國立臺灣師範大學教有研究中心編：教育發展的新方向：為教改開處方，頁79-104。臺北：國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。
     李雄輝（1979）。蔡元培美感教育思想研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，22，495-503。
     李坤崇（2001）。綜合活動學習領域教材教法。台北：心理。
     李臣（1998）。活動課程研究。北京：教育科學。
     尚杰（1996）。荒原裡的閱讀—德里達閱讀方法述評。哲學雜誌，15，112-130。
     尚新建、杜麗燕譯（1992）。詹姆斯‧施密特著。梅洛龐蒂現象學與結構主義之間。台北：桂冠圖書公司。
     程仁慧（2002）。國民小學綜合活動實施現況之調查研究。屏東師範學院/國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
     周珮儀（1995）。艾斯納教育批評理論之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
     周珮儀（1999a）。當代課程理論的新趨勢—從社會批判到後現代。國教學報，11，259-282。
     周珮儀（1999b）。從社會批判到後現代--季胡課程理論之研究。台北：師大書苑。
     周珮儀（2002）。後現代課程取向的萬花筒。教育研究月刊，102，40-53。
     周珮儀（2003）。後現代課程取向的理論探究。國立台北師範學院學報，17，頁111-138。
     周淑卿（2005）。課程美學探究範疇之建構--當前的問題與未來的方向。課程與教學季刊，8（2），1-14。
     周穎、劉玉宇譯（2001）。Gilles Deleuze著。尼采與哲學。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。
     洪漢鼎譯（1993）。伽達瑪著。真理與方法：哲學詮釋學的基本特徵。臺北：時報(上海：上海譯文，1999)。
     洪詠善（2008）。美感經驗觀點的教學再概念化。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
     張文質（2008）。教育是慢的藝術。上海：華東師範大學出版社。
     余樹德（2000）。美育的革命。香港:香港美術教育協會。
     余鴻榮譯（2001）。Nietzsche著。查拉圖斯特拉如是說。台北:志文。
     許銘欽（1999）。從教學時數的配置構想，談九年一貫課程學習領域的實施問題與建議。收錄於中華民國教材研究發展學會主編。九年一貫課程研討會論文集：邁向課程新紀元（上），頁128-138。臺北：中華民國教材研究發展學會。
     伍振鷟（1992）。中國教育思想史（先秦部份）。台北市：師大書苑。
     單文經（2002）。現代與後現代課程論爭之平議。師大學報，47（2）,123-142。
     歐用生、楊慧文（1998）。新世紀的課程改革-兩岸觀點。台北：五南。
     歐用生（2002）。披著羊皮的狼？—九年一貫課程改革的深度思考。載於中華民國教材研究發展學會主編：新世紀教育工程—九年一貫課程再造（頁1-24）。台北：中華民國教材研究發展學會。
     歐用生(2003)。課程典範再概念。高雄:麗文。
     歐用生(2006)。課程理論與實踐。台北:學富文化。
     曾端真（2000），「國民小學綜合活動領域課程的規劃」。國民教育，41（1），頁10-18。
     曾致鏹（2003）國小教師參與課程發展之實踐知識研究--以綜合活動學習領域為例。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
     范信賢（2001）。「文本」:後現代思潮下對「教材」概念的省思。國教學報，13，頁171~185。
     項退結（1989）。海德格。台北：東大圖書公司。
     結構群譯（1990）。Kant Immanuel著。康德底實用人類學。台北：結構群出版社。
     黃國彥（2003）。橋與路--寫給青少年。台北:巨流圖書公司。
     黃光雄主編（2001）。統整課程的設計。高雄:麗文。
     黃光雄、蔡清田等人（2001）。課程設計-理論與實際。台北:五南。
     
     黃惠雯等譯（2003）。Benjamin F. Carbtree & William L. Miller著。最新質性方法與研究。台北:韋伯文化。
     黃光雄、蔡清田（1999）。課程設計—理論與實際。台北：五南。
     黃光國(2005)。華人社會中的臉面觀。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳主編：華人本土心理學，頁215-248。台北:遠流出版社。
     黃政傑（1991）。人的再造運動通識教育與未來台灣社會(19版)。台北市：中時晚報。
     黃瓈葳（2002）。綜合活動學習領域主題統整課程設計之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
     黃譯瑩（2001）。從系統理論觀點探究活動課程與九年一貫綜合活動課程：本質、原理與展望。應用心理學研究，9，頁215-251。
     黃譯瑩(2003)。綜合活動學習領域之理論與研究。綜合活學習領域礎研習手冊。台北：教育部編印。
     黃榮村、胡家祥（1996）。民間興學與辦學的政策環境：以中小學為例。臺北市：行政院教育改革審議委員會。
     黃惠雯、童琬芬、粱文蓁、林兆衛譯（2003）。Benjamin F. Carbtree & William L. Miller著。最新質性方法與研究。台北:韋伯文化。
     姚朋等譯（2001）。Peter Burke著。歷史學與社會理論。上海：人民出版社。
     郭淑惠（2002）。左手與我的故事—一個生命教育的自我探索。新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
     陳美如（2003）。「評鑑猶如一趟永無止境的旅程-教師面對課程評鑑的思考」。教師天地，第122期（2003.2），頁61-65。
     陳元仲（2004）。澎湖縣國小綜合活動學習領域教科書選用規準與現況之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
     陳伯璋（1999）。九年一貫課程的理念與理論分析。中華民國教材研究發展學會編，邁向課程新紀元（頁10-18）。台北：中華民國教材研究發展學會。
     陳伯璋（2001）。新世紀課程改革的省思與挑戰。臺北市:師大書苑。
     陳伯璋、歐用生主編（2003）。課程與教學饗宴。高雄: 麗文。
     陳伯璋（2005）。從課程改革省思課程研究典範的新取向。當代教育研究，13（1），1-33。
     陳伯璋、張盈堃（2007）。來自日常生活的教育學院：社區、課程與美學的探究。教育與社會研究，12，41-72。
     
     陳惠邦(1998)。兩種教師繼續教育理論的比較分析。竹市文教，11，頁30-39。
     陳惠邦(1998)。教育行動研究。台北:師大書苑。
     陳淑敏(1999)兒童隱喻理解能力之發展。NSC 88-2413-H-153-008 屏東師院學報，13，頁163-182。
     陳榮華（1995）。從莊子的無主體性思考論中國文化的特性。載於詮釋與創造：傳統中華文化及其未來發展。臺北：聯合報系文化基金會。
     陳嘉映、王慶節合譯（1987/1999）。海德格爾著。熊偉校：存在與時間。北京：三聯書店。
     陳嘉映（1995）。海德格爾哲學概論。北京：三聯。
     胡榮等譯（1995）。G. H. Mead著。心靈、自我與社會。台北市:桂冠出版。
     簡良平（2004）。「教師即課程決定者－課程實踐的議題」。教育研究資訊，第12卷第4期，頁95-112。
     謝金青（2001）。「走一條九年一貫的康莊大道－教師的學習、準備與行動」。教育研究月刊，第83期，頁120-121。
     游家政（1998），「教科書的選用問題及改進」。北縣教育，第27期，頁75-83。
     莊靜宜（2004）。國小綜合活動教科書選用政策之執行研究－以花蓮市國小為例。國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
     張素花（2002）。國民小學一年級綜合活動課程實施之行動研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
     張景媛等（2000）。進行行動研究應注意的問題。教師天地，105，頁13-16。
     張凱元（2004）。談學校本位課程實施的迷失與策略。師說，182，頁47-58。
     張君玫譯（1999）。Norman K. Denzin著。解釋性互動論。台北:弘智。
     張廷琛等譯（1989）。Michel Foucault著。性史。上海：上海科學技術文獻出版社。
     楊凱麟譯（2000）。Gilles Deleuze著。德勒茲論傅柯。台北:麥田出版。
     楊大春(1996)。文本的世界。北京：中國社會科學文獻出版。
     楊思偉主編(1999)。中日學校經營之比較。台北:師大書苑。
     楊思偉（2002）。「基本能力指標知建構與落實」。教育研究月刊，第96期，頁17-22。
     楊忠斌譯（2008）。教育美學。臺北：師大書苑。
     詹棟樑（2002）。後現代主義教育思潮。台北：渤海堂。
     顏妙桂(2001)。綜合活動學習領域之學理基礎與實施策略。載於開創新世紀-九年一貫課程綜合活動學習領域課程與教學研討會彙編, 368。台北:臺灣師大。
     葉朗（1986）。中國美學史大綱（上冊）。台北市：滄浪。
     蘇峰山編（2002）。意識、權力與教育：教育社會學理論導讀。嘉義：南華大學教育社會學研究所，頁245-255。
     馮朝霖、薛化元（1996）。主體性與教育權。國家政策(動態分析)雙週刊，131，頁6-8。
     馮朝霖（2001）。質性方法中參照推論分析—傳記研究之案例分析。應用心理研究，12，頁25-48。
     馮朝霖（2003）。教育哲學專論：主體、情性與創化。台北市：高等教育。
     馮朝霖（2003）。希望與參化-Freire教育美學推衍與補充之嘗試。第一屆社會理論與教育學術研討會—Critical Pedagogy，屏東師範學院。
     游家政（1993）。再造「國民教育九年一貫課程」的圖像:課程綱要的規劃與可能問題。教育論壇，26，頁4-18。
     蔡美玲譯（1994）。Haskell E.Bernstein著。生活有力的藝術。台北:遠流出版。
     蔡敏玲(2001)。教育質性研究報告的書寫:我在紀實與虛構之間的認真與想像。國立台北師範學院學報，14，頁233-260。
     蔡仁厚（1988）。中國哲學史大綱。台北市：台灣學生書局。
     蔡清田（2003）。課程政策決定。台北：五南。
     蔡清田（2005）。課程領導與學校本位課程發展。台北：五南。
     蔡美麗譯（1991）。M. Heidegger著。賀德齡與詩之本質。載於鄭樹森編：現象學與文學批評。台北：東大。
     鄧曉芒譯（2002）。康德著。楊祖陶校：判斷力批判。北京：人民。
     孫周興譯（1996）。海德格著。藝術作品的本源。收錄於：孫周興主編：海德格爾選集。上海：上海三聯。
     顏湘如譯（C. Honore著）（2005）。慢活。臺北：大塊文化。
     姜文閔譯（1992）。J.Dewey著。我們如何思維。台北:五南。
     賴金男、林麗菲譯（1992）。Herman Kahn等著。未來200年:建構22世紀全球新藍圖。台北：遠流。
     蕭昭君、陳巨擘譯（2003）。McLaren, Peter（1998）。校園生活：批判教育學導論。台北：巨流。
     彭秉權譯（2005）。Barry Kanpol（1997）。批判教育學的議題與趨勢。高雄：麗文。
     賴其萬、府傳孝譯（1982）。Freud, Sigmund著。夢的解析。台北市:志文出版社。
     劉北成譯（1998）。Jacques Derrida著。言語與現象。台北:桂冠出版社。
     劉惠珍譯（2002）。Henry A. Giroux著。跨越邊界。上海市: 華東師範大學。
     劉昌元（1986）。西方美學導論。台北：聯經。
     熊曣（2003）。「九年一貫綜合活動學習領域課程意涵與課程設計之探討」。初等教育學刊，14，頁109-134。
     鄭秀琴等(2006)。中小學專業發展學校之規劃專案。台灣師大與僑大整合後強化未來發展計畫成果報告。發表於2006年12月17日教育部中教司及台灣師大主辦：台灣師大與僑大整合後強化未來發展計畫成果發表會。
     薛絢譯（1996）。Appleby著。文歷史的真相。台北:正中。
     薛絢譯（C. Honore著）（2009）。慢的教育。臺北：大塊文化。
     董學文、王葵譯（1987）。Barthes,R.著。符號學美學。沈陽：遼寧人民出版社，頁75。
     甄曉蘭（2004）。課程理論與實務-解構與重建。台北:高等教育。
     龔卓軍譯（1998）。Darian Leader著。拉岡。台北:立緒文化，頁1-175。
     龔卓軍譯（1999）。C. G. Jung著。人及其象徵:榮格思想精華的總結。台北:立緒文化。
     龔卓軍,王靜慧譯（2003）。Gaston Bachelard著。空間詩學。台北：張老師出版社。
     譚光鼎等編著（2001）。多元文化教育。台北：國立空中大學。
     彭懷棟譯（2000）。Edward W. Said著。鄉關何處:薩依德回憶錄。台北:立緒。
     傅士珍譯（2000）。H. Adams著。西方文學理論四講。台北：洪範。
     潘德榮（2002）。本體詮釋學與當代精神。載於：本體與詮釋。北京：三聯書店。
     蔡敏玲、余曉雯譯(2003)。Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M.著。敘說探究─質性研究中的經驗與故事。臺北：心理。
     蔡敏玲、彭海燕譯（1998）。Cazden,C.B.著。教室言談:教與學的語言。台北:心理。
     鍾添騰（2009）。課程美學探究方法之研究。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     二、英文參考文獻：
     Adler, S. (1991). Forming a critical pedagogy in the social studies methods class: the use of imaginative literature. In B. R. Tabachnick., & K. M. Zeichner (eds.), Issues & Practices in Inquiry-oriented Teacher Education. London: The Falmer Press.
     Airasian, P. W., & Walsh, M. E.（1997）. Constructivist cautions. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 444-449.
     Apple, M. (1979). Ideology and Curriculum. London: Routledge.
     Apple, M. (1982). Education and Power. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
     Apple, M. (1993) Official Knowledge. New York: Routledge, 1993. Ch. 3, pp. 44-63.
     Apple, M. W. (1999). Remembering Capital On the Connections Between Fries and Education. In William F. Pinar (Ed.). Contemporary curriculum discourses: Twenty years of JCT (pp.312-324). N. Y.: Peter Lang.
     Aronowitz,S., H.Giroux(1991). Postmodern Education-Politics, Cultures and Social Criticism. Oxford: Minnesota U.P.
     Ausubel, D. P. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd.ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     Anyon, J. (1994). The retreat of marixism and socialist feminism: Postmodern and poststructural theories in education. Curriculum Inquiry, 24(2), 115-133.
     Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H. A. (1985). Education under siege: The conservative, liberal and radical debate over schooling. Massachusette: Bergin & Garvey.
     Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H. A. (1991). Postmodern education: Politics, culture and social criticism. University of Minnesota Press. N.Y.：Routledge.
     Aronowitz, S. (1989). Working class identity and celluloid fantasy. In H. A. Giroux, & R.I. Simon (Eds.), Popular culture, schooling and everyday life (pp.197-218). Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey.
     Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Beck, J. S.（1995）.Cognitive Therapy: Basics and Beyond. New York: The Guiford Press.
     Blazer, B. (1986). I want to talk to you about writing：5-year- old children speak. In B. B. Schieffelin & P. Gilmore (Eds.). The acquisition of literacy：Ethnographic perspectives,75-109, Norwood. NJ:Ablex
     Banks, James (1997). Educating citizens in a multicultural society. New York:
     Barthes, R.(1975). The Pleasure of the Text. Hill & Wang, New York: Jonathan Cape.
     
     Barrett, M. (1991). The politics of truth: From Marx to Foucault. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
     Bandura A.（1989）. Social learning theory. Annuals of Child Development , 6 , pp.1-60
     Bandura, A. (1984). Recycling misconceptions and perceived self-efficacy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8 (3), 231-255.
     Bandura, A. (1988). Organizational applications of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13, 137-164.
     Beane, J. A. (1998). Curriculum integration: designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College Press.
     bell hooks (1990). Yearning: Race, Gender and Cultural Politics. Boston, MA: South End Press.
     bell hooks (1994). Teaching to transgresss. New York & London: Routledge.
     bell hooks (2003). Teaching Community: A Pedagogy of Hope. New York: Routledge.
     Ben-Peretz, M. & Mendelson, N. & Friedrich, W. & Kron(2003). How Teachers in Different Educational Contexts View their Roles. Teacher Educational Jounal, 19(2), 275-290.
     Brophy, J. E.（1988）. On motivation students. In D. Berliner & B. Rosenshine（Eds.）：Talks to teachers. New York：Random House.
     Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
     Borch-Jacobsen, M. (1991). Lacan: The absolute master. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
     Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
     Burke, K. (1961/1970). The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Reprint. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     Behar- Horenstein, L. S. (2000). Can the modern view of curriculum be refined by postmodern criticism? In L.S. Behar- Horenstein & J.Glanz (Eds.), Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspectives (pp.6-33). London: Bergin & Garvey.
     Best, S. & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. London: Macmillan.
     Beyer, L, D. & Liston, D. P. (1996). Curriculum in conflict: Social vision, educational agendas, and progressive school reform. Teachers College, Columbia University.
     Bloom, B. S. et. al. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive domain. N. Y.: David McKay.
     Bohm, David., (1996). On dialogue. edited by Nichol, L., N.Y.: Routledge.
     Britton, J., et al., (1975). The Development of Writing Abilities. London: Macmillan.
     
     Briggs, J. & Peat, F. D. (1999). Seven life lessons of chaos: Timeless wisdom from the science of change. N. Y.: Harper Collins Publishers.
     Burden, P.R.（1980）. Teachers’ perceptions of the characteristics and influence on their personal and professional development. Teacher’s perception of their personal and professional development. MERA.
     Buckinggham, D. (1996). Critical pedagogy and media education: A theory in search of a practice. Curriculum studies, 28(6), 627-650.
     Carlos Alberto Torres (1998), Democracy, education, and multiculturalism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
     Cazden, B.C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
     Chang, C. (2003). Talking about the past: How do Chinese mothers elicit narratives from their young children across time. Narrative Inquiry, 13(1), 99-126.
     Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988). Power and criticism：Poststructural investigations in education. N. Y.: Teachers College.
     Cherryholmes, C. H. (1999). Reading Pragmatism. New York: Teachers College Press.
     Connolly, J. A. & Doyle, A. B. (1984). Relation of social fantasy play to social competence in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology. 20, 797-806.
     Cortazzi, M.（1989）. Narrative analysis. London ; Washington, D.C. : Falmer Press.
     Cortazzi, M. (1993). Narrative analysis. London: The Falmer Press.
     Caillois, Roger (1958, 1961, 2001). Man, Play and Games. Trans. Meyer Barash. Chicago: U of Illinois P.
     Caillois, R. (2001;1958), Man, Play and Games (tr. by M. Barash). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
     Château, J. (1946). Le Jeu de L’enfant après Trois Ans, sa nature sa discipline. Paris: Arin.
     Cooley, Charles Horton (1964). Human Nature and Social Organization. New York: Schocken.
     Cooley,C.H.（1922）.Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner`s.
     Coffey, A. & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
     Christine E. Sleeter & Carl A. Grant (1993). Making choices for multicultural ducation: Five approaches to race, class and gender. Alban, New York: Merrill Publishing Company.
     Christine E. Sleeter. (1996). Multicultural education as social activism. Albany, New York:University of New York Press.
     Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education & learning: A guide for teacher and educators. London: Kogan Page.
     David Bohm & David Peat（1987）. Science, Order, and Creativeity. Routtedgem ,pp. 247.
     Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. Spivak trans.). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
     Derrida, J. (1980) Writing and Difference. Alan Bass trans. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
     Dewey,J.(1916, 1959). Democracy and education. N.Y.:The Macmillan Company. 31th printing.
     Dewey,J.(1920,1982).Reconstruction in philosophy. Repr. in J.A.Boydston(ed.). The middle works of John Dewey.1899-1924 (vol.12). Southern Illinois University Press.
     Dewey,J.(1929,1958). Experience and nature. N. Y. : Dover Publications Inc.
     Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.
     Dewey, J. (1971). How we think. Chicago: Henry Regnery. (Original work published 1993)
     Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons. (Original work published 1934)
     Dilthey, W. (1883). Introduction to the Human Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
     Dreyfus, Hubert(1991). Being-in-the-world: a commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I, Cambridge/ Mass.: MIT Press.
     Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scoti, P. (1994).Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7),5-12.
     Dodge, K. (1983). Behavioral antecedents of peer social status. Child Development, 54, 1386-1399.
     Doll, W. E. (1989). Foundations of a post-modern curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(3), 243-253.
     Doll, W. E. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
     Drake, S. M. (1991). How our team dissolved the boundaries. Educational Leadership, 49（2）, 20-22.
     Drake, S. M. (1992). A story model: an integrated curriculum project. Ontario: Catharines.
     Drake, S. M. (1993). Planning integrated curriculum: The call to adventure. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
     Drake, S. M. (1998). Creating integrated curriculum: Proven Waysto increase student learning. California: Corwin.
     Doll, W. E. &Gough, N. (2000)(Eds.).Curriculum Visions. New York: Peter Lang.
     Eisner, E. W. (1991).The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.
     Eisner, E. W. (2002a).The educational imagination.(3rd Ed. ) New Jersey:Merrill Prentice Hall.
     Eisner, E. W. (2002b). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale university press./New Haven& London.
     Eisner, E. W. (1982). Cognition and curriculum. N.Y.: Longman.
     
     Eisner, E. W. (1993). Invitational conference on the hidden consequences of a national curriculum. Educational Researcher, 22(7), 38-39.
     Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn`t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297-324.
     Engel, S. (1995). The stories children tell. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
     Ediger, M. (1999). Reading in the primary grades. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 434 304)
     Ediger, Marlow. (1999). Data Driven Decision Making. College Student Journal 37:1 , 9-15.
     Eisner,E.(1981). The role of the arts in cognition and curriculum.Phi Delta Kappan,63(1),48-52.
     Eisner,E.(1985). The art of educational evaluation: A personal view. Philadelphia.PA:Falmer.
     Eisner ,E. (1996). Is “the art of teaching” a metaphor? In M.R.Kompt,W.R.Bond,D.Dworet&R.T. Book(Eds. ),Changing research and practice:Teachers’professionalism identities and knowledge. Philadelphia:The Falmer Press.
     Eisner,E. (2002).The arts and the creation of mind.New Heaven:Yale University Press.
     Egan-Robertson, A. & Willett, J. (1998). Students as ethnogrphers, thinking and doing ethnography: a bibligographic essay.” In Egan-Robertson, A. and Bloome, D.（eds）Students as Researchers of Culture and Language in their own Communities. NJ: Hampton Press.
     Egan-Robertson, A. and Bloome, D. (1998). “Introduction.” In Egan-Robertson, A. and Bloome, D.（eds）Students as Researchers of Culture and Language in their own Communities. NJ: Hampton Press.
     Egan-Robertson, A. and Bloome, D.（eds）(1998). Students as Researchers of Culture and Language in their own Communities. NJ: Hampton Press.
     Erikson, E. H. (1950/1953). Childhood and Society. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
     Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
     Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the Life Cycle. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
     Erikson, E. H., Erikson, J. M., & Kivnick, H. Q. (1997). Vital involvement in old age: The experience of old age in our time. W. W. Norton and Company.
     Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., & Smith, S.M. (1992). Creative Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Pres
     Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish-The Birth of the Prison. N. Y.:Pantheon Books.
     Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. C. Gordon (Ed.) N. Y.: Pantheon.
     Foshay, A. W. (2000). The curriculum: Purpose, substance, practice. N. Y.: Teachers College.
     Freire, P.(1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.
     Freire. P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Harmondsworth. Middle Sex. Penguin Books.
     Freire, P. (1976). A few notations about the world concientization. In R. Dale, et al., (Eds.), Schooling and capitalism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
     Freire,P.(1986).Pedagogy of the Oppressed. N.Y.:Continuum Books.
     Freire, P. & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the Word and the World. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
     Freire, P. (1994).Pedagogy of Hope – Reliving Pedagogy of The Oppressed. New York：Continuum.
     Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of Freedom—Ethics, Democracy, and Civic Courage. Lanham Boulder New York Oxford：Rowman & Littelfield publishers, Inc.
     Gadamer, H. G.(1975). Truth and Method. New York: Continuum.
     Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind. New York, NY: Simon &Schuster.
     Gass, M. A. (1993). The evolution of processing adventure therapy experiences. In M. A. Gass (Ed.) Adventure therapy: Therapeutic applications of adventure programming (pp. 219-229). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
     Gadamer, H.G.(1994). Truth and Method. trans. by J. Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York.
     Garvey, C. (1977). Play. Cambridge, MA : Harvard.
     Gass, M. A.(1993). Adventure therapy：therapeutic applications of adventure programming . Dubuque, IA：Kendall/Hunt.
     Gergen, K. J. & Gergen, M. M. (1988)Narrative and the self as relationship. Advance Experimental Social Psychology. Vol17.Ny: Academic Press.
     Gergen, M. & Gergen, K. (2000). Qualitatve inquiry: tensions and transformations. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research(2nd ed.) (pp. 1025-1046). London: Sage.
     Gee, J. P. (2000). Discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
     Gee, J. P. (2000). An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. New York: Routledge.
     Gee, J. P., Michaels, S., & O’Connor M. C. (1992). Discourse analysis. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 227-291). San Diego: Academic Press.
     Gee, J. P., & Green, J. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-170.
     Gergen, K. J.(1973).Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26(2), 309-320.
     Gergen, K. J. (1990). Toward a Postmodern Psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 18(1), 23-34.
     Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction, London: SAGE.
     Greene, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. N.Y.: Teachers College Press.
     Greene, M. (1988a).The dialectic of freedom. N.Y.: Teachers College Press.
     Greene, M. (1988b).The artistic-aesthetic and curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(4), 283-296.
     Greene, M. (1992). The passions of pluralism. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
     Greene, M. (1971). Teaching for aesthetic experience. Toward an aesthetic education. Washington, DC: Music Educators National Conference Proceeding.
     Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination-Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
     Gibson, R.（1986）. Critical Theory and Education. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
     Giddens, A. (1997). The Third Way. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     Giddens, A. (1998). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     Giddens,A.（1989）.Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     Giroux, H.（1983）.Theory & Resistance In Education: A Pedagogy for the Opposition. Massachusette: Bergin & Garvey.
     Giroux,H.(1988). Teachers as Intellectuals-Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning. N.Y.: Bergin & Garvey.
     Giroux, H. A. (1988). Schooling for democracy: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. London & New York: Routledge.
     Giroux, H. A. & Simon, R. I. (1989). Popular culture, schooling and everyday life. Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey.
     Giroux, H. A. (1991). Modernism, postmodernism, and feminism: Rethinking the Boundaries of Educational Discourse. In H. A. Giroux (Ed.), Postmodernism, feminism, and cultural politic (pp.1-59). State University of New York Press.
     Giroux,H.(1992).Border Crossings-Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education. N.Y.:RKP. Westview Press.
     Giroux, H. (1992). Resisting Difference: Cultural Studies and the Discourse of Critical Pedagogy. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson & P. Treichler（eds.）, Cultural Studies (pp.199-212). New York: Routledge.
     Giroux, H. A. (1992).Border crossing：Cultural workers and the culture. London & New York: Routledge.
     Giroux, H. A. (1994). Disturbing pleasure: learning popular politics of education. London & N.Y.: Routledge.
     Giroux, H. A. & McLaren, P. (1994). Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies. London & N.Y.: Routledge.
     Giroux,H.(1997). Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope-Thery. CuHure and Schooling. OX:Weatview Press.
     Goffman,E.（1959）.The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
     Goffman,E.（1967）.Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
     Goffman,E.（1961）.Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
     Goffman,E.（1963）. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
     Goffman,E.（1971）.Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Harper & Row.
     Good, C. V. (1959). Dictionary of education. New York, NY : McGraw-Hill.
     Grove, R. & Short, E. C. (1991). Theoretical Inquiry: Components and Structure .In E. C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry (pp.221-224). Albany: State University of New York Press.
     Grumet, M. (1978). Songs and situations. In G. Willis(Ed.), Qualitative evaluation(pp. 274-315). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
     Grumet, M.R. (1988). Bitter Milk: Woman and Teaching. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
     Grumet, M. (1990). On the daffodils that come before the swallow dares. In E. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The Continuing Debate (pp. 101-120). New York: Teachers College Press.
     Grumet,M.(1990). Retrospective-Autobiraphy and the Analysis of Educational Experience,Cambridge Journal of Education.20:3.
     Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. NJ: McGraw-Hill.
     Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ. Buffalo, NewYork: Creative Education Foundation, Inc. Hocevar, D. & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy andcritique of measurement used in the study of creativity. In J.
     Guignon, Charles (1993). The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Habermas, J.（1979）. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
     
     Habermas, J.（1984）. The Theory of Communicative Action（T. McCarthy, Trans.）. Boston: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1981)
     Hartley S.(1997). Reschooling Society. N.Y.: The Falmer Press.
     Heath, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school. Language Society, 11, 49-76.
     Hekman, S. J. (1995). Moral voices, moral selves: Carol Gilligan and feminist moral theory. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
     Henderson,J.G., & Hawthrone, R.D.(1995). Transformative Curriculum Leadership. N.J.:Prentice Hall.
     hooks, bell(1994).Teaching to Transgress-Education as the Practice of Freedom. N.Y.:RKP.
     Hobbs, T. (1986) The Rogers interview, Changes: Journal of the Psychology and Psychotherapy Association
     Hobbs, T. (1992) Experiential Training: Practical Guidelines, London and New York, Routledge.
     Holt, M. (2002). This time to start the slow school movement. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(4), 264-271。
     Huebner, D. (1975). Curricular language and classroom meanings. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The Reconceptualists. (pp.217-237). Berkeley, CA.
     Huizinga, J. (1955), Homo Ludens—A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: The Beacon Press.
     Huebner, D. E. (1975). Curricular language and classroom meanings. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists (pp.217- 236). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
     Huebner, D. E. (1985). Spirituality and knowing. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching: The ways of knowing. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
     Huebner, D.(1975). The Tasks of the Curricular Theorist. In W. Pinar(Ed.),Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists(pp. 250-270). California: McCutchan.
     Henry A. Giroux,(1992). Boarder Crossings: Cultural Workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc.
     Hirsch, J., Klim, K. H., Relkin, N. R. & Lee, K. M. (1997). Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature, 388, 171-174.
     Hlewowitsh, P. S. & Wraga, W. G. (1995). Social class analysis in the early progressive tradition. Curriculum Inquiry, 25(1), 7-21.
     Hlewowitsh, P. S. (2000). The Common Unity and the Progressive Restoration of the Curriculum Field. In J. Glanz & L. S. Behar-Horenstein (Eds.), Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspectives (pp.54-69). London: Bergin & Garvey.
     Hunter, I. (1994). Rethinking the school. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
     
     Iannone, R. (1998). Art as a theoretical base for the postmodern curriculum. Clearing House, 72(2), 118-122.
     Ira Shor, (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     Jackson,P.W.（1968）.Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     Jameson（1997：93)
     Jameson, F. (1984). Foreword. In J. F. Lyotard, The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (pp. vii-xxv). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     Jencks, C.（1987）. What is post-modernism？（2nd enlarged, rev. ed.）New York: St. Martin’s Press.
     Jones, E.（1996) Masked Performance: The Play of Self and Other in Ritual and Theatre, Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P.
     Jung, C. G.（1963）Memories, Dreams, Reflections, Aniela Jaffe, ed., Richard and Clara Winston, trans.(New York: Pantheon.)
     Kanpol,B.(1997). Issues and Trends in Critical Pedagogy. N.J.: Hampton Press.
     Kearney, R.（1987）. Modern Movement in European Philosophy. Taipei, Taiwan: Simda Book Company.
     Keeves, J.P., Masters, G.N.（1999）. Advances in measurement in educational research and assessment. New York : Pergamon.
     Kesson, K. R. (1999). Toward a Curriculum of Mythopoetic Meaning. In J. G., Henderson, & K. R. Kesson, (Eds.). Understanding democratic curriculum leadership. New York: Teachers College Press. (HKa)
     Kincheloe, J. L., McLaren, P. & Steinberg, S. R. (1997). Series editors` foreword. In H. A. Giroux (Ed.), Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope. (pp.ix-xiv) Colorado:Westniew.
     Kincheloe, J. (1993). Toward a political politics of teacher thinking: Mapping the postmodern. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
     Kincheloe, J. (1998). Pinar’s Currere and Identity in Hyperreality: Grounding the Post-formal Nation of Intrapersonal Intelligence. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum toward new identities (pp.129-142). London & N. Y.: Garland.
     Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
     Kraft, R. J. & Sakofs, M. (1985). The theory of experiential education. Boulder, CO: Association for Experiential Education.
     Labov, W. (1982). The Social Stratification of English in New York City (3rd print). Washington D. C: Center for Applied Linguistics.
     Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1997). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1-4), 3-38.
     Lacan, J. (1978). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis: The seminar of Jacques Lacan Book XI. New York: Norton.
     Lacan, J. (1990). Television: A Challenge to the Psychoanalytic Establishment.? Ed. Joan Copjec. Trans. Denis Hollier, Rosalind Krauss, and Annette Michelson.? New York: Norton.
     Lave, J. & Wenger, E., (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
     Landy, R. (1993) Persona and Performance, London: Jessica Kingsley.
     Landy, R. (1986) Drama Therapy: Concepts and Practices, Springfield, IL, Charles C. Thomas.
     Lassahn,R. (1983). Paedagogische Anthropologie. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer Verlag.
     Lauritzen, C., & Jaeger, M. (1997). Integrating learning through story: The narrative curriculum. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers.
     Lamme, L. L. (1994). Stories form our past: making history come alive for children. Social Education, 58(3), 159-164.
     Levstik, L. S. (1986). The relationship between historical response & narrative in a sixth grade classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 14(1), 1-15.
     Levstik, L. S. (1995). Narrative constructions: cultural frames for history. The Social Studies, 86(3), 113-116.Leslie（1987）
     Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Tousand Oaks: Sage.
     Lincoln, Y. S. (1992). Curriculum studies and the traditions of inquiry: The Humanistic Tradition. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum. (pp.70-97). N.Y.: Macmilan.
     Lipman（1969）
     Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979)
     Lyotard, J. F. (1989). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
     Mann, S. (1992). Telling a life story: Issues for research. Management Education and Development, 23, 271-280.
     Meleau-Ponty, Maurice (1962) trans. Colin Smith, Phenomenology of Perception, London: Meleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964) The Primacy of Perception, U.S.: Northwestern UP.
     Macuse, H. (1972). Counter-Revolution and Revolt. Boston: BeaconPress.
     
     Martin Heidegger(1962/1927). Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. San Francisco: Harper and Row.
     Marsh, C. J. (1997). Planning, management and ideology: Key concepts for understanding curriculum. London: The Falmer Press.
     McCarthy, W. A.（1978）. The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
     Mclaren,P., P.Leonard(2000). Absent Discourses-Paulo Freire and the Dangerous Memories of Liberation, in Mclaren, Leonard(2000). Paulo Freire-A Critical Encounter.(eds.) N.Y.: RKP
     McLaren, P. (1994). Multiculturalism and the postmodern critique: Toward a pedagogy of resistance and transformation. In H. A. Giroux & P. Mclaren (Eds.), Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies. London & N.Y.：Routledge.
     McMillan, M.(1995). Education through the imagination. England : thoemmes Pres.
     Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
     Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
     Michaels, S. (1981). “Sharing time”: Children’s narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language Society, 10, 423-442.
     Minami, M., & McCabe, A. (1991). Haiku as a discourse regulation device: A stanza analysis of Japanese children’s personal narratives. Language in Society, 20, 577-599.
     Mishler, E.G. (1995). Models of narrative analysis: A typology. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 5(2), 87-123.
     Miller, J. P. (1988). The holistic curriculum. Ontario: Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
     Millar(1989).Poverty and the lone-parent：Thechallenge to social policy. Aldershot：Avebury.
     Miller, J. L.(1998). Biography,Education and Questions of the Private Voice, in C. Kride,(1998)Writing Educational Biography-Exporations in Qualitative Research.(ed.). N.Y.:Garland.
     Murray, Michael (1978). Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays, New Haven: Yale University Press.
     Ornstein, A. C. & Hunkins, F. P. (1998). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Oram（1989）
     Orr, D.(1992). Ecological literacy—Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany: Suny Press.
     Pinar, W. F. (1992). Dreamt into existence by others: Curriculum theory and school reform. Theory into Practice, 31(3), 228-235.
     
     Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P. & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding Curriculum: An introduction to study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. N.Y.: Peter Lang .
     Pinar, W.F., A. E. Pautz(1998). Construction Scars- Autobiographical Voice in Biography, In C. Kridel,ib.id.,
     Popkewitz,T.S.(2000). Globalization/ Regionalism, Knowledge and the Educational Practices. in Pokewitz,T.S. Educational Knowledge-Changing Relationship Between the State, Civic Society and the Educational Community. SUNY.
     Piaget, J. (1983). The Child’s Conception of the World. Totowa, New Jersey：Rowman & Allanheld.
     Piner,W.(ed.).(1975). Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
     Piner,W.& Grumet,M.(1976).Toward A Poor Curriculum. Dubuque, IA:Kendal/Hunt.
     Pinar, W. F. & Reynolds, W. M. & Slatley, P.& Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding Curriculum-An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary Discourses. (eds.)
     Pinar, W. F. (1998). The Passionate Mind of Maxine Grerne: I am not yet. London: Falmer Press.
     Phinney, F.C.（1972）. Professional growth opportunities for American teachers abroad. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganV
     Prakash, M. S. (1995). Ecological literacy for moral virtue—Orr on moral education for postmodern sustainability. Journal of Moral Education, 24(1), 3-18.
     Ricoeur, Paul. (1984) Time and Narrative, Vol. 1, tr. By Kathleen McLaughin & David. Pellauer. Chicago: The university of Chicago press. Chap.1,5,6.
     Riessman, C.K.（1993）. Qualitative studies in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
     Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
     Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
     Rudolf, A. M. (1975). Dilthey: Philosopher of the Human Studies. Princeton.
     Shubert , William H. (1992). Practitioners influence curriculum theory: Autobiographical reflections. Theory into Practice. 31(3), 236-244.
     Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1),1-23。
     
     Slavin, R. E.（1990）. Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools ： A best evidence synthesis. Re-view of Educational Research, 60, 3, 471-500.
     Sleary, L.（1978）. The professional growth continuum: A kaleidoscope. Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 14-17.
     Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era. N.Y.: Garland.
     Smith, C., L. K.(1998). Fiction, Fantasy, and Femininities: Popular Texts and Young Woman`s Literacies. In Carbon, Apple, ibid.
     Schubert, W. H., & Schubert, A. L. (1986). A dialogue with Ralph W. Tyler. Journal of Thought, 21(1), 91-118.
     Short, E. C. (1991). Introduction: Understanding Curriculum Inquiry .In E.C. Short (Ed.), Forms of Curriculum Inquiry (pp.1-25). Albany: State University of New York Press.
     Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum development in the postmodern era. N.Y.: Garland.
     Spehler, R. M. & Slattery, P. (1999).Voices of imagination: The artist as prophet in the process of social change. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2(1), 1-12.
     Teacher’s Life and Work. in W.Pinar(1998). Curriculum-Toward New I Goodson,I.(1998). Storying the Self-Life Politics and the Study of the dentity. N.Y.: Garland Pub.
     Thomas Sebeok（1960）
     Thomas, T. P. & Schubert, W. H. (1997) Recent curriculum theory: Proposals for understanding, critical praxis, inquiry and expansion. Educational Theory, 47(2), 261-285.
     Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Vallance, E. (1988). Aesthetic inquiry: Art criticism. In E. Short (Ed), Forms of curriculum inquiry (pp. 155-172). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
     Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann & G. Vaker, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Vygotsky（1998）
     Waters, W. & L Godzich, W.（1989）. Reading de Man reading. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     White, Hayden. (1972). The Structure of Historical Narrative, Cleo 1(2):5-20.
     White, Hayden. (1972). Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
     White, Hayden. (1987). The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
     Wittgenstein L. (1963). Philosophical Investigations. New York: The Macmillan Company.
     Willis, P. (1981). Learning to labor. Hampshire: Gower.
     Wraga, W. G. (1996). Toward a curriculum theory for the new century: essay review of Patric Slattery, Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era. Curriculum Studies, 28(4), 463-474
描述 博士
國立政治大學
教育學系
93152513
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093152513
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 馮朝霖<br>林淑玲zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳麗文zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Li Wenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳麗文zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Li Wenen_US
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-May-2016 13:28:54 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-May-2016 13:28:54 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-May-2016 13:28:54 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0093152513en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94947-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93152513zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 九年一貫課程「將傳統學科統整為七大學習領域」，在知識結構方面的改變，對教師的影響甚大；其中，尤以「綜合活動學習領域」的實施，最令基層教師感到困擾。研究者多年來擔任師資培育中心的教學研究發現，現行九年一貫課程「綜合活動學習領域」的實施，存在著許多問題。綜合課程強調「統整課程」及「合科教學」的部分，期能透過「綜合活動學習領域」的設置及活動過程的體驗與反思，將傳統的分科課程，統整為相互關聯的領域，並且落實學生生活能力的陶養。其若以「美學/哲學的課程取向」論述，教師可依循課程綱要，自主的規劃教學活動，學校也可採取彈性課程的方式，由生活經驗出發，讓學童探索真實生活中的經驗，學習對事物做深入的體驗、判斷與理解意義；因此，如何促使「生活中美感」與「體驗活動」產生聯結，落實學童生活能力的陶養，便成為「綜合活動課程實踐」的關鍵因素。
     本文採用敘事分析的探究途徑，針對國小「綜合活動學習領域」教師的教學實踐敘事，進行「教師自我歸因」的敘事意義創塑，強調「閱讀文本、分享對話、游移遊戲」半結構式的課程設計，一種閱讀詮釋、對話視域與遊戲體驗的課程美學探究。本研究發現：
     1、透過「教師敘事－自我歸因」的概念範疇，論述「綜合活動學習領域」課程美學之可能實踐途徑；包含：省思跨領域綜合課程的交互作用；充實學生生活使其發展完美人性；閱讀、對話與分享意念的課程實踐；課程中的主體性與情境詮釋以及一種「詮釋性反省的手法」：教師藉以覺察「師生從學習經驗中協商出的意義」，進而重新審視課程中「教育經驗的內涵及意圖」，「敘事」得以「喚醒了課程主體」，一種生命歷程、多元情境脈絡的建構過程、衝擊與協商。
     2、透過「課程實踐－教學敘事」的案例分析，探究「觀看/閱讀生活世界」課程美學之可能實踐途徑；包含：協商的、批判性的、互為文本的解讀；師生互為「觀看、傾聽、感覺和感動」；「體驗作為一種學習方式」的課程實施；「故事作為一種學習方式」的課程實施；「想像文本作為一種學習方式」的課程實施以及「詩性智慧作為一種學習方式」的課程實施：綜合活動課程藉以創造出一個「詩性的經驗、感性的融合」，使其經營出一種對話遊戲中的新經驗，由詩、遊戲、美感經驗所構成的學習課程；在學習過程中，師生得以審視「由故事、創造組成，觸及學習者感覺、同情與想像力思維、詩性的體驗和實踐的智慧」。
     3、透過「課程美學－詮釋批判」的概念範疇，探究「師生交感於美學視野」的互動過程之可能途徑；包含：詩性的、經驗內容的自我體驗和表白；在意義流動開展中解構自己的課程世界；情境互動、解構文本、賞析與視野融合；一種神話、故事、夢想與想像課程意圖；教育如何促使人們發展自己的知覺力量；如何促使人們發展美好生活的課程實踐：教師藉以審視或覺察「他們處於不斷的變化之中」，一種「主動的學習歷程，一種整體的生命經驗」，而且透過「課程的動態觀點」，所有的課程設計，都可以是一種思維過程的課程經驗，一種美好生活的「覺醒和意識」的模式。
     4、透過「課程敘事－語言流動」的分析架構，探究「生活中美感」與「體驗活動」產生聯結之途徑；包含：語言的可能性與「觀看途徑」的運作；「以學生為主體」真實生活世界的知識實踐；能將「生活世界」真實存在的主題加以關連；對話提供未完成性的關連與希望的存有覺察；教育情境的動態發展，人與豐富情境的「邂逅」：教師藉以重新審視過程中「課程片段、組成部分的反思與回饋」，一種「人與情境多樣性的檢視」，透過「自由的實踐」，質疑一切看似靜態與不易變更之社會事實，一種互動不斷演化出渾沌的、眾多不同模式的課程實踐。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Integrating the traditional disciplines into seven main learning areas according to Grade 1-9 Curriculum has imposed great impact on both knowledge structures and the instructors; especially the practice of Integrative Activities Learning really troubles the grass-roots teachers. Base on years of experience as an instructor in Teacher Education Center, I’ve found that the current implementation of Integrative Activities Learning is not easy to be executed in reality. The purpose of Integrative Activities Learning is to emphasize on integrated curriculum and all teaching aspect, and through the participation in the planned activities, students are in the mean time trained to have good life skills. When focusing on Aesthetics/Philosophy Course Orientation, not only the teachers can follow the curriculum guidelines to set the pace of the appropriate teaching plans, the schools can also adopt flexible curriculum; this will be a good way to guide the students in learning, exploring and experiencing daily events. Moreover, through the practice of Integrative Activities, students can learn to link their daily experiences with beauty of life, thus, they’re trained to own life skills.
     
     This abstract uses narrative analysis as the mean to proceed the evaluation on the effectiveness of practicing Integrative Activities Learning in elementary schools. To study the result of stressing on story reading, dialogue sharing and doing waver game – a curriculum for attaining story understanding, dialogue forming and gaming experience. This research found the following points.
     
     1.Through the concept of narrative analysis and self-attribution to realize the possible ways of implementing Integrative Activities Learning in elementary schools. Teachers can guide students to learn to appreciate beauty and moral values in the process of reading, sharing dialogues and thoughts with others and further more, developing good life skills.
     
     2.Through the concept of curriculum practice and teaching narrative to find the possible ways of practicing aesthetics curriculum in schools. Teachers can interact with students by sharing with one another about what their thoughts are in watching, listening and feeling from doing group activities. Through experimenting, reading and imagination brainstorming, Integrative Activities Learning can be a great tool to create a fun and productive learning experience for both teachers and students.
     
     3.Through the concept of curriculum aesthetics and interpretation of critical to determine the possible ways of teacher/student interaction on beauty. Teachers and students can interact through studying myths, stories and dreams; by taking the initiative to learn and share inner thoughts with others, students can cultivate an overall life experience and gain the awakening and awareness through calculated curriculum learning.
     
     4.Through the concept of curriculum narrative and language flow to find the connection between beauty of life and experience activities. Teachers can show the students the possibilities of languages usages, discuss the life themes of this living world with students and help them to examine, question and clarify the seems unchanged social facts and find the core value of their own through participating in the course.		en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 第一章 緒 論
     第一節 研究背景 ………………………………………………………………1
     第二節 研究動機與目的 ………………………………………………………6
     
     第二章 文獻探討
     第一節 國小綜合活動課程的實施……………………………………………8
     第二節 綜合活動課程美學的可能性 ………………………………………19
     
     第三章 研究方法
     第一節 敘事分析的方法 ……………………………………………………30
     第二節 研究架構與歷程 ……………………………………………………38
     
     第四章 研究過程及資料分析
     第一節 綜合活動的教學實踐 ………………………………………………66
     第二節 對話遊戲的體驗學習 ………………………………………………88
     第三節 閱讀對話的故事模式 ……………………………………………122
     第四節 對話遊戲的想像文本………………………………………………142
     第五節 閱讀對話的詩性智慧………………………………………………193
     第六節 綜合活動的課程內涵 ……………………………………………206
     
     第五章 研究結果與討論
     第一節 賦權增能的心靈解放 ……………………………………………220
     第二節 重新理解的意義建構 ……………………………………………257
     第三節 轉化學習的行動能量 ……………………………………………290
     第四節 創造熱情的積極意向 ……………………………………………332
     
     第六章 結 論
     第一節 教育本質上是一種美學的實踐 ………………………………380
     第二節 「教師敘事/自我歸因」的課程詮釋 …………………………385
     第三節 「觀看/閱讀生活世界」課程美學之實踐………………………386
     第四節 「師生交感於美學視野」的互動途徑 ………………………387
     第五節 「生活中美感」與「體驗活動」之聯結途徑 …………………388
     第六節 閱讀詮釋、對話視域與遊戲體驗的課程美學 ………………389
     
     參考文獻……………………………………………………………………412
     圖一：綜合活動學習領域的教學內涵………………………………………9
     圖二：研究過程的再現層級…………………………………………………34
     圖三：研究架構與歷程………………………………………………………38
     圖四：研究視域之檢視………………………………………………………38
     圖五：研究方法之檢視………………………………………………………43
     圖六：研究內容之檢視………………………………………………………48
     圖七：體驗學習的迴圈過程 …… …………………………………………51
     圖八：體驗是一種學習方式的案例…………………………………………52
     圖九：故事模式………………………………………………………………53
     圖十：故事是一種學習方式的案例…………………………………………54
     圖十一：想像文本是一種學習方式的案例…………………………………57
     圖十二：詩性智慧是一種學習方式的案例…………………………………59
     圖十三：研究目的之檢視……………………………………………………60
     圖十四：綜合活動的教學實踐………………………………………………66
     圖十五：對話、遊戲的體驗學習……………………………………………88
     圖十六：閱讀、對話的故事模式……………………………………………122
     圖十七：對話、遊戲的想像文本……………………………………………142
     圖十八：閱讀、對話的詩性智慧……………………………………………193
     圖十九：綜合活動的課程內涵………………………………………………206
     圖二十：賦權增能的心靈解放………………………………………………220
     圖二十一：「對話」的體驗學習……………………………………………221
     圖二十二：「遊戲」的體驗學習……………………………………………230
     圖二十三：「賦權增能」的課程美學………………………………………192
     圖二十四：「心靈解放」的課程美學………………………………………239圖二十五：重新理解的意義建構……………………………………………257
     圖二十六：「閱讀」的故事模式……………………………………………258
     圖二十七：「對話」的故事模式……………………………………………266
     圖二十八：「重新理解」的課程美學………………………………………273
     圖二十九：「意義建構」的課程美學………………………………………281
     圖三十：轉化學習的行動能量………………………………………………290
     圖三十一：「對話」的想像文本……………………………………………291
     圖三十二：「遊戲」的想像文本……………………………………………301
     圖三十三：「轉化學習」的課程美學………………………………………310
     圖三十四：「行動能量」的課程美學………………………………………321
     圖三十五：創造熱情的積極意向……………………………………………332
     圖三十六：「閱讀」的詩性智慧……………………………………………333
     圖三十七：「對話」的詩性智慧……………………………………………344
     圖三十八：「創造熱情」的課程美學………………………………………355
     圖三十九：「積極意向」的課程美學………………………………………366
     圖四十：教育本質上是一種美學的實踐……………………………………381
     圖四十一：閱讀詮釋、對話視域與遊戲體驗的課程美學 ………………389
     圖四十二：對話視域的體驗學習 …………………………………………390
     圖四十三：閱讀詮釋的故事模式 …………………………………………396
     圖四十四：閱讀對話的想像文本 …………………………………………401
     圖四十五：遊戲體驗的詩性智慧 …………………………………………407
     表一：綜合活動階段的能力指標 ……………………………………………12		-
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒 論
     第一節 研究背景 ………………………………………………………………1
     第二節 研究動機與目的 ………………………………………………………6
     
     第二章 文獻探討
     第一節 國小綜合活動課程的實施……………………………………………8
     第二節 綜合活動課程美學的可能性 ………………………………………19
     
     第三章 研究方法
     第一節 敘事分析的方法 ……………………………………………………30
     第二節 研究架構與歷程 ……………………………………………………38
     
     第四章 研究過程及資料分析
     第一節 綜合活動的教學實踐 ………………………………………………66
     第二節 對話遊戲的體驗學習 ………………………………………………88
     第三節 閱讀對話的故事模式 ……………………………………………122
     第四節 對話遊戲的想像文本………………………………………………142
     第五節 閱讀對話的詩性智慧………………………………………………193
     第六節 綜合活動的課程內涵 ……………………………………………206
     
     第五章 研究結果與討論
     第一節 賦權增能的心靈解放 ……………………………………………220
     第二節 重新理解的意義建構 ……………………………………………257
     第三節 轉化學習的行動能量 ……………………………………………290
     第四節 創造熱情的積極意向 ……………………………………………332
     
     第六章 結 論
     第一節 教育本質上是一種美學的實踐 ………………………………380
     第二節 「教師敘事/自我歸因」的課程詮釋 …………………………385
     第三節 「觀看/閱讀生活世界」課程美學之實踐………………………386
     第四節 「師生交感於美學視野」的互動途徑 ………………………387
     第五節 「生活中美感」與「體驗活動」之聯結途徑 …………………388
     第六節 閱讀詮釋、對話視域與遊戲體驗的課程美學 ………………389
     
     參考文獻……………………………………………………………………412
     圖一：綜合活動學習領域的教學內涵………………………………………9
     圖二：研究過程的再現層級…………………………………………………34
     圖三：研究架構與歷程………………………………………………………38
     圖四：研究視域之檢視………………………………………………………38
     圖五：研究方法之檢視………………………………………………………43
     圖六：研究內容之檢視………………………………………………………48
     圖七：體驗學習的迴圈過程 …… …………………………………………51
     圖八：體驗是一種學習方式的案例…………………………………………52
     圖九：故事模式………………………………………………………………53
     圖十：故事是一種學習方式的案例…………………………………………54
     圖十一：想像文本是一種學習方式的案例…………………………………57
     圖十二：詩性智慧是一種學習方式的案例…………………………………59
     圖十三：研究目的之檢視……………………………………………………60
     圖十四：綜合活動的教學實踐………………………………………………66
     圖十五：對話、遊戲的體驗學習……………………………………………88
     圖十六：閱讀、對話的故事模式……………………………………………122
     圖十七：對話、遊戲的想像文本……………………………………………142
     圖十八：閱讀、對話的詩性智慧……………………………………………193
     圖十九：綜合活動的課程內涵………………………………………………206
     圖二十：賦權增能的心靈解放………………………………………………220
     圖二十一：「對話」的體驗學習……………………………………………221
     圖二十二：「遊戲」的體驗學習……………………………………………230
     圖二十三：「賦權增能」的課程美學………………………………………192
     圖二十四：「心靈解放」的課程美學………………………………………239圖二十五：重新理解的意義建構……………………………………………257
     圖二十六：「閱讀」的故事模式……………………………………………258
     圖二十七：「對話」的故事模式……………………………………………266
     圖二十八：「重新理解」的課程美學………………………………………273
     圖二十九：「意義建構」的課程美學………………………………………281
     圖三十：轉化學習的行動能量………………………………………………290
     圖三十一：「對話」的想像文本……………………………………………291
     圖三十二：「遊戲」的想像文本……………………………………………301
     圖三十三：「轉化學習」的課程美學………………………………………310
     圖三十四：「行動能量」的課程美學………………………………………321
     圖三十五：創造熱情的積極意向……………………………………………332
     圖三十六：「閱讀」的詩性智慧……………………………………………333
     圖三十七：「對話」的詩性智慧……………………………………………344
     圖三十八：「創造熱情」的課程美學………………………………………355
     圖三十九：「積極意向」的課程美學………………………………………366
     圖四十：教育本質上是一種美學的實踐……………………………………381
     圖四十一：閱讀詮釋、對話視域與遊戲體驗的課程美學 ………………389
     圖四十二：對話視域的體驗學習 …………………………………………390
     圖四十三：閱讀詮釋的故事模式 …………………………………………396
     圖四十四：閱讀對話的想像文本 …………………………………………401
     圖四十五：遊戲體驗的詩性智慧 …………………………………………407
     表一：綜合活動階段的能力指標 ……………………………………………12		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093152513en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 綜合活動學習領域zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 課程美學zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 敘事探究zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) integrate activity learning areaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) curriculum aestheticsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) narrative researchen_US
dc.title (題名) 閱讀、對話與遊戲：國小綜合活動課程美學之探究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文參考文獻：
     行政院教改審議委員會（1996）。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院。
     中共中央編譯局譯（2004）。Marx, Karl 著[1867]。論分工與工資。資本論(卷 1)。北京:人民。
     司琦（1989、1993、1997）。課程導論。台北市：五南圖書出版有限公司。
     王彩鳳（2005）。利社會行為融入國小三年級綜合活動領域教學實施成效之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文，台北。
     王麗雲譯（2002）。Apple, Michael W.（1990）。意識型態與課程。臺北：桂冠。
     王秋絨（1991）。批判教育論在我國教育實習制度規劃上的意義。台北：師大書苑。
     白春仁等譯（1998）。Bakhtin, M. M.（1929）著。陀思妥耶夫斯基的詩學問題。載於：巴赫金全集第五卷。河北省：河北教育出版社。
     白春仁等譯（1998）。Mikhail Bakhtin著。文本、對話與人文。石家庄:河北教育出版社。
     方德隆（2000）。九年一貫課程學習領域之統整。課程與教學季刊，3（1），頁1-18。
     方永泉 譯(2003)。Paulo Freire著。受壓迫者教育學。台北:巨流。
     石玉資、陳麒仁（2004）。從九年一貫課程改革角度探討教師應有專業發展。師說，179，頁36-39。
     成令方等譯（2001）。Allen G. Johnson (1997)著。見樹又見林：社會學作為一種生活、實踐與承諾。台北：群學出版社。
     江政寬譯（2002）。Peter Burke著。歷史學與社會理論。臺北：麥田出版社。
     宋文里譯（2001）。J. Bruner著。教育的文化－文化心理學觀點。台北:遠流。
     李咏吟(1998)。認知教學理論與策略。台北:心理出版社。
     余紫瑛（2000）。探索教育活動影響國中學生自我概念與人際關係之實驗研究。國立台灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
     何英奇（2001）。行思知交融的經驗學習模式在綜合活動課程上之應用。載於歐用生、莊梅枝主編：九年一貫課程學習領域研討會論文集。台北：中華民國教材研究發展學會。
     池叔華（2001）。國小低年級教師綜合活動課程的實務知識之研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，台北。
     教育部（2000）。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。
     教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要綜合活動學習領域。
     教育部（2004）。「國民教育法」。教育部公報，356，頁7-9。
     吳心怡（2002）。「教科書」。國民教育，43（2），頁79-84。
     林怡秀（1999）。國民小學課程統整模式之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
     林宏濤譯（2009）。Max Horkheimer、Theodor W. Adorno著。啟蒙的辯證。台北市:商周。
     朱元鴻(1997)。背判/洩密/出賣:論民族誌的冥界。台灣社會研究季刊，26，頁29-65。
     朱孟實譯(1981)。Georg W. F. Hegel 著。美學。台北市：里仁。
     宋文里譯（2001）。Jerome Bruner原著。教育的文化：文化心理學的觀點。臺北：遠流。
     沈清松（1996）。在主體哲學的廢墟中重估自我-呂格爾的自我詮釋學述評。載於哲學雜誌，15，頁4-43。
     沈清松（1993）。從現代到後現代。哲學雜誌，4，4-25。
     沈清松（2000）。在批判、質疑與否定之後--後現代的正面價值與視野。哲學與文化，27（8），705-716。
     沈霓（2001）。教育部長曾志朗:教師是教改成功之鑰。康軒教育雜誌，44，頁42-56。
     高新建（2002）。編輯手記。中等教育，53(6)，頁1。
     高新建等人（2003）。發展以學習者為中心的高品質中小學課程。收錄於國立臺灣師範大學教有研究中心編：教育發展的新方向：為教改開處方，頁79-104。臺北：國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。
     李雄輝（1979）。蔡元培美感教育思想研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，22，495-503。
     李坤崇（2001）。綜合活動學習領域教材教法。台北：心理。
     李臣（1998）。活動課程研究。北京：教育科學。
     尚杰（1996）。荒原裡的閱讀—德里達閱讀方法述評。哲學雜誌，15，112-130。
     尚新建、杜麗燕譯（1992）。詹姆斯‧施密特著。梅洛龐蒂現象學與結構主義之間。台北：桂冠圖書公司。
     程仁慧（2002）。國民小學綜合活動實施現況之調查研究。屏東師範學院/國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
     周珮儀（1995）。艾斯納教育批評理論之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
     周珮儀（1999a）。當代課程理論的新趨勢—從社會批判到後現代。國教學報，11，259-282。
     周珮儀（1999b）。從社會批判到後現代--季胡課程理論之研究。台北：師大書苑。
     周珮儀（2002）。後現代課程取向的萬花筒。教育研究月刊，102，40-53。
     周珮儀（2003）。後現代課程取向的理論探究。國立台北師範學院學報，17，頁111-138。
     周淑卿（2005）。課程美學探究範疇之建構--當前的問題與未來的方向。課程與教學季刊，8（2），1-14。
     周穎、劉玉宇譯（2001）。Gilles Deleuze著。尼采與哲學。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。
     洪漢鼎譯（1993）。伽達瑪著。真理與方法：哲學詮釋學的基本特徵。臺北：時報(上海：上海譯文，1999)。
     洪詠善（2008）。美感經驗觀點的教學再概念化。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
     張文質（2008）。教育是慢的藝術。上海：華東師範大學出版社。
     余樹德（2000）。美育的革命。香港:香港美術教育協會。
     余鴻榮譯（2001）。Nietzsche著。查拉圖斯特拉如是說。台北:志文。
     許銘欽（1999）。從教學時數的配置構想，談九年一貫課程學習領域的實施問題與建議。收錄於中華民國教材研究發展學會主編。九年一貫課程研討會論文集：邁向課程新紀元（上），頁128-138。臺北：中華民國教材研究發展學會。
     伍振鷟（1992）。中國教育思想史（先秦部份）。台北市：師大書苑。
     單文經（2002）。現代與後現代課程論爭之平議。師大學報，47（2）,123-142。
     歐用生、楊慧文（1998）。新世紀的課程改革-兩岸觀點。台北：五南。
     歐用生（2002）。披著羊皮的狼？—九年一貫課程改革的深度思考。載於中華民國教材研究發展學會主編：新世紀教育工程—九年一貫課程再造（頁1-24）。台北：中華民國教材研究發展學會。
     歐用生(2003)。課程典範再概念。高雄:麗文。
     歐用生(2006)。課程理論與實踐。台北:學富文化。
     曾端真（2000），「國民小學綜合活動領域課程的規劃」。國民教育，41（1），頁10-18。
     曾致鏹（2003）國小教師參與課程發展之實踐知識研究--以綜合活動學習領域為例。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
     范信賢（2001）。「文本」:後現代思潮下對「教材」概念的省思。國教學報，13，頁171~185。
     項退結（1989）。海德格。台北：東大圖書公司。
     結構群譯（1990）。Kant Immanuel著。康德底實用人類學。台北：結構群出版社。
     黃國彥（2003）。橋與路--寫給青少年。台北:巨流圖書公司。
     黃光雄主編（2001）。統整課程的設計。高雄:麗文。
     黃光雄、蔡清田等人（2001）。課程設計-理論與實際。台北:五南。
     
     黃惠雯等譯（2003）。Benjamin F. Carbtree & William L. Miller著。最新質性方法與研究。台北:韋伯文化。
     黃光雄、蔡清田（1999）。課程設計—理論與實際。台北：五南。
     黃光國(2005)。華人社會中的臉面觀。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳主編：華人本土心理學，頁215-248。台北:遠流出版社。
     黃政傑（1991）。人的再造運動通識教育與未來台灣社會(19版)。台北市：中時晚報。
     黃瓈葳（2002）。綜合活動學習領域主題統整課程設計之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
     黃譯瑩（2001）。從系統理論觀點探究活動課程與九年一貫綜合活動課程：本質、原理與展望。應用心理學研究，9，頁215-251。
     黃譯瑩(2003)。綜合活動學習領域之理論與研究。綜合活學習領域礎研習手冊。台北：教育部編印。
     黃榮村、胡家祥（1996）。民間興學與辦學的政策環境：以中小學為例。臺北市：行政院教育改革審議委員會。
     黃惠雯、童琬芬、粱文蓁、林兆衛譯（2003）。Benjamin F. Carbtree & William L. Miller著。最新質性方法與研究。台北:韋伯文化。
     姚朋等譯（2001）。Peter Burke著。歷史學與社會理論。上海：人民出版社。
     郭淑惠（2002）。左手與我的故事—一個生命教育的自我探索。新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
     陳美如（2003）。「評鑑猶如一趟永無止境的旅程-教師面對課程評鑑的思考」。教師天地，第122期（2003.2），頁61-65。
     陳元仲（2004）。澎湖縣國小綜合活動學習領域教科書選用規準與現況之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
     陳伯璋（1999）。九年一貫課程的理念與理論分析。中華民國教材研究發展學會編，邁向課程新紀元（頁10-18）。台北：中華民國教材研究發展學會。
     陳伯璋（2001）。新世紀課程改革的省思與挑戰。臺北市:師大書苑。
     陳伯璋、歐用生主編（2003）。課程與教學饗宴。高雄: 麗文。
     陳伯璋（2005）。從課程改革省思課程研究典範的新取向。當代教育研究，13（1），1-33。
     陳伯璋、張盈堃（2007）。來自日常生活的教育學院：社區、課程與美學的探究。教育與社會研究，12，41-72。
     
     陳惠邦(1998)。兩種教師繼續教育理論的比較分析。竹市文教，11，頁30-39。
     陳惠邦(1998)。教育行動研究。台北:師大書苑。
     陳淑敏(1999)兒童隱喻理解能力之發展。NSC 88-2413-H-153-008 屏東師院學報，13，頁163-182。
     陳榮華（1995）。從莊子的無主體性思考論中國文化的特性。載於詮釋與創造：傳統中華文化及其未來發展。臺北：聯合報系文化基金會。
     陳嘉映、王慶節合譯（1987/1999）。海德格爾著。熊偉校：存在與時間。北京：三聯書店。
     陳嘉映（1995）。海德格爾哲學概論。北京：三聯。
     胡榮等譯（1995）。G. H. Mead著。心靈、自我與社會。台北市:桂冠出版。
     簡良平（2004）。「教師即課程決定者－課程實踐的議題」。教育研究資訊，第12卷第4期，頁95-112。
     謝金青（2001）。「走一條九年一貫的康莊大道－教師的學習、準備與行動」。教育研究月刊，第83期，頁120-121。
     游家政（1998），「教科書的選用問題及改進」。北縣教育，第27期，頁75-83。
     莊靜宜（2004）。國小綜合活動教科書選用政策之執行研究－以花蓮市國小為例。國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
     張素花（2002）。國民小學一年級綜合活動課程實施之行動研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
     張景媛等（2000）。進行行動研究應注意的問題。教師天地，105，頁13-16。
     張凱元（2004）。談學校本位課程實施的迷失與策略。師說，182，頁47-58。
     張君玫譯（1999）。Norman K. Denzin著。解釋性互動論。台北:弘智。
     張廷琛等譯（1989）。Michel Foucault著。性史。上海：上海科學技術文獻出版社。
     楊凱麟譯（2000）。Gilles Deleuze著。德勒茲論傅柯。台北:麥田出版。
     楊大春(1996)。文本的世界。北京：中國社會科學文獻出版。
     楊思偉主編(1999)。中日學校經營之比較。台北:師大書苑。
     楊思偉（2002）。「基本能力指標知建構與落實」。教育研究月刊，第96期，頁17-22。
     楊忠斌譯（2008）。教育美學。臺北：師大書苑。
     詹棟樑（2002）。後現代主義教育思潮。台北：渤海堂。
     顏妙桂(2001)。綜合活動學習領域之學理基礎與實施策略。載於開創新世紀-九年一貫課程綜合活動學習領域課程與教學研討會彙編, 368。台北:臺灣師大。
     葉朗（1986）。中國美學史大綱（上冊）。台北市：滄浪。
     蘇峰山編（2002）。意識、權力與教育：教育社會學理論導讀。嘉義：南華大學教育社會學研究所，頁245-255。
     馮朝霖、薛化元（1996）。主體性與教育權。國家政策(動態分析)雙週刊，131，頁6-8。
     馮朝霖（2001）。質性方法中參照推論分析—傳記研究之案例分析。應用心理研究，12，頁25-48。
     馮朝霖（2003）。教育哲學專論：主體、情性與創化。台北市：高等教育。
     馮朝霖（2003）。希望與參化-Freire教育美學推衍與補充之嘗試。第一屆社會理論與教育學術研討會—Critical Pedagogy，屏東師範學院。
     游家政（1993）。再造「國民教育九年一貫課程」的圖像:課程綱要的規劃與可能問題。教育論壇，26，頁4-18。
     蔡美玲譯（1994）。Haskell E.Bernstein著。生活有力的藝術。台北:遠流出版。
     蔡敏玲(2001)。教育質性研究報告的書寫:我在紀實與虛構之間的認真與想像。國立台北師範學院學報，14，頁233-260。
     蔡仁厚（1988）。中國哲學史大綱。台北市：台灣學生書局。
     蔡清田（2003）。課程政策決定。台北：五南。
     蔡清田（2005）。課程領導與學校本位課程發展。台北：五南。
     蔡美麗譯（1991）。M. Heidegger著。賀德齡與詩之本質。載於鄭樹森編：現象學與文學批評。台北：東大。
     鄧曉芒譯（2002）。康德著。楊祖陶校：判斷力批判。北京：人民。
     孫周興譯（1996）。海德格著。藝術作品的本源。收錄於：孫周興主編：海德格爾選集。上海：上海三聯。
     顏湘如譯（C. Honore著）（2005）。慢活。臺北：大塊文化。
     姜文閔譯（1992）。J.Dewey著。我們如何思維。台北:五南。
     賴金男、林麗菲譯（1992）。Herman Kahn等著。未來200年:建構22世紀全球新藍圖。台北：遠流。
     蕭昭君、陳巨擘譯（2003）。McLaren, Peter（1998）。校園生活：批判教育學導論。台北：巨流。
     彭秉權譯（2005）。Barry Kanpol（1997）。批判教育學的議題與趨勢。高雄：麗文。
     賴其萬、府傳孝譯（1982）。Freud, Sigmund著。夢的解析。台北市:志文出版社。
     劉北成譯（1998）。Jacques Derrida著。言語與現象。台北:桂冠出版社。
     劉惠珍譯（2002）。Henry A. Giroux著。跨越邊界。上海市: 華東師範大學。
     劉昌元（1986）。西方美學導論。台北：聯經。
     熊曣（2003）。「九年一貫綜合活動學習領域課程意涵與課程設計之探討」。初等教育學刊，14，頁109-134。
     鄭秀琴等(2006)。中小學專業發展學校之規劃專案。台灣師大與僑大整合後強化未來發展計畫成果報告。發表於2006年12月17日教育部中教司及台灣師大主辦：台灣師大與僑大整合後強化未來發展計畫成果發表會。
     薛絢譯（1996）。Appleby著。文歷史的真相。台北:正中。
     薛絢譯（C. Honore著）（2009）。慢的教育。臺北：大塊文化。
     董學文、王葵譯（1987）。Barthes,R.著。符號學美學。沈陽：遼寧人民出版社，頁75。
     甄曉蘭（2004）。課程理論與實務-解構與重建。台北:高等教育。
     龔卓軍譯（1998）。Darian Leader著。拉岡。台北:立緒文化，頁1-175。
     龔卓軍譯（1999）。C. G. Jung著。人及其象徵:榮格思想精華的總結。台北:立緒文化。
     龔卓軍,王靜慧譯（2003）。Gaston Bachelard著。空間詩學。台北：張老師出版社。
     譚光鼎等編著（2001）。多元文化教育。台北：國立空中大學。
     彭懷棟譯（2000）。Edward W. Said著。鄉關何處:薩依德回憶錄。台北:立緒。
     傅士珍譯（2000）。H. Adams著。西方文學理論四講。台北：洪範。
     潘德榮（2002）。本體詮釋學與當代精神。載於：本體與詮釋。北京：三聯書店。
     蔡敏玲、余曉雯譯(2003)。Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M.著。敘說探究─質性研究中的經驗與故事。臺北：心理。
     蔡敏玲、彭海燕譯（1998）。Cazden,C.B.著。教室言談:教與學的語言。台北:心理。
     鍾添騰（2009）。課程美學探究方法之研究。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     二、英文參考文獻：
     Adler, S. (1991). Forming a critical pedagogy in the social studies methods class: the use of imaginative literature. In B. R. Tabachnick., & K. M. Zeichner (eds.), Issues & Practices in Inquiry-oriented Teacher Education. London: The Falmer Press.
     Airasian, P. W., & Walsh, M. E.（1997）. Constructivist cautions. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 444-449.
     Apple, M. (1979). Ideology and Curriculum. London: Routledge.
     Apple, M. (1982). Education and Power. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
     Apple, M. (1993) Official Knowledge. New York: Routledge, 1993. Ch. 3, pp. 44-63.
     Apple, M. W. (1999). Remembering Capital On the Connections Between Fries and Education. In William F. Pinar (Ed.). Contemporary curriculum discourses: Twenty years of JCT (pp.312-324). N. Y.: Peter Lang.
     Aronowitz,S., H.Giroux(1991). Postmodern Education-Politics, Cultures and Social Criticism. Oxford: Minnesota U.P.
     Ausubel, D. P. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd.ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     Anyon, J. (1994). The retreat of marixism and socialist feminism: Postmodern and poststructural theories in education. Curriculum Inquiry, 24(2), 115-133.
     Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H. A. (1985). Education under siege: The conservative, liberal and radical debate over schooling. Massachusette: Bergin & Garvey.
     Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H. A. (1991). Postmodern education: Politics, culture and social criticism. University of Minnesota Press. N.Y.：Routledge.
     Aronowitz, S. (1989). Working class identity and celluloid fantasy. In H. A. Giroux, & R.I. Simon (Eds.), Popular culture, schooling and everyday life (pp.197-218). Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey.
     Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Beck, J. S.（1995）.Cognitive Therapy: Basics and Beyond. New York: The Guiford Press.
     Blazer, B. (1986). I want to talk to you about writing：5-year- old children speak. In B. B. Schieffelin & P. Gilmore (Eds.). The acquisition of literacy：Ethnographic perspectives,75-109, Norwood. NJ:Ablex
     Banks, James (1997). Educating citizens in a multicultural society. New York:
     Barthes, R.(1975). The Pleasure of the Text. Hill & Wang, New York: Jonathan Cape.
     
     Barrett, M. (1991). The politics of truth: From Marx to Foucault. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
     Bandura A.（1989）. Social learning theory. Annuals of Child Development , 6 , pp.1-60
     Bandura, A. (1984). Recycling misconceptions and perceived self-efficacy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8 (3), 231-255.
     Bandura, A. (1988). Organizational applications of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13, 137-164.
     Beane, J. A. (1998). Curriculum integration: designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College Press.
     bell hooks (1990). Yearning: Race, Gender and Cultural Politics. Boston, MA: South End Press.
     bell hooks (1994). Teaching to transgresss. New York & London: Routledge.
     bell hooks (2003). Teaching Community: A Pedagogy of Hope. New York: Routledge.
     Ben-Peretz, M. & Mendelson, N. & Friedrich, W. & Kron(2003). How Teachers in Different Educational Contexts View their Roles. Teacher Educational Jounal, 19(2), 275-290.
     Brophy, J. E.（1988）. On motivation students. In D. Berliner & B. Rosenshine（Eds.）：Talks to teachers. New York：Random House.
     Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
     Borch-Jacobsen, M. (1991). Lacan: The absolute master. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
     Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
     Burke, K. (1961/1970). The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Reprint. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     Behar- Horenstein, L. S. (2000). Can the modern view of curriculum be refined by postmodern criticism? In L.S. Behar- Horenstein & J.Glanz (Eds.), Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspectives (pp.6-33). London: Bergin & Garvey.
     Best, S. & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. London: Macmillan.
     Beyer, L, D. & Liston, D. P. (1996). Curriculum in conflict: Social vision, educational agendas, and progressive school reform. Teachers College, Columbia University.
     Bloom, B. S. et. al. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive domain. N. Y.: David McKay.
     Bohm, David., (1996). On dialogue. edited by Nichol, L., N.Y.: Routledge.
     Britton, J., et al., (1975). The Development of Writing Abilities. London: Macmillan.
     
     Briggs, J. & Peat, F. D. (1999). Seven life lessons of chaos: Timeless wisdom from the science of change. N. Y.: Harper Collins Publishers.
     Burden, P.R.（1980）. Teachers’ perceptions of the characteristics and influence on their personal and professional development. Teacher’s perception of their personal and professional development. MERA.
     Buckinggham, D. (1996). Critical pedagogy and media education: A theory in search of a practice. Curriculum studies, 28(6), 627-650.
     Carlos Alberto Torres (1998), Democracy, education, and multiculturalism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
     Cazden, B.C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
     Chang, C. (2003). Talking about the past: How do Chinese mothers elicit narratives from their young children across time. Narrative Inquiry, 13(1), 99-126.
     Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988). Power and criticism：Poststructural investigations in education. N. Y.: Teachers College.
     Cherryholmes, C. H. (1999). Reading Pragmatism. New York: Teachers College Press.
     Connolly, J. A. & Doyle, A. B. (1984). Relation of social fantasy play to social competence in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology. 20, 797-806.
     Cortazzi, M.（1989）. Narrative analysis. London ; Washington, D.C. : Falmer Press.
     Cortazzi, M. (1993). Narrative analysis. London: The Falmer Press.
     Caillois, Roger (1958, 1961, 2001). Man, Play and Games. Trans. Meyer Barash. Chicago: U of Illinois P.
     Caillois, R. (2001;1958), Man, Play and Games (tr. by M. Barash). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
     Château, J. (1946). Le Jeu de L’enfant après Trois Ans, sa nature sa discipline. Paris: Arin.
     Cooley, Charles Horton (1964). Human Nature and Social Organization. New York: Schocken.
     Cooley,C.H.（1922）.Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner`s.
     Coffey, A. & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
     Christine E. Sleeter & Carl A. Grant (1993). Making choices for multicultural ducation: Five approaches to race, class and gender. Alban, New York: Merrill Publishing Company.
     Christine E. Sleeter. (1996). Multicultural education as social activism. Albany, New York:University of New York Press.
     Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education & learning: A guide for teacher and educators. London: Kogan Page.
     David Bohm & David Peat（1987）. Science, Order, and Creativeity. Routtedgem ,pp. 247.
     Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. Spivak trans.). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
     Derrida, J. (1980) Writing and Difference. Alan Bass trans. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
     Dewey,J.(1916, 1959). Democracy and education. N.Y.:The Macmillan Company. 31th printing.
     Dewey,J.(1920,1982).Reconstruction in philosophy. Repr. in J.A.Boydston(ed.). The middle works of John Dewey.1899-1924 (vol.12). Southern Illinois University Press.
     Dewey,J.(1929,1958). Experience and nature. N. Y. : Dover Publications Inc.
     Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.
     Dewey, J. (1971). How we think. Chicago: Henry Regnery. (Original work published 1993)
     Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons. (Original work published 1934)
     Dilthey, W. (1883). Introduction to the Human Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
     Dreyfus, Hubert(1991). Being-in-the-world: a commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I, Cambridge/ Mass.: MIT Press.
     Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scoti, P. (1994).Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7),5-12.
     Dodge, K. (1983). Behavioral antecedents of peer social status. Child Development, 54, 1386-1399.
     Doll, W. E. (1989). Foundations of a post-modern curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(3), 243-253.
     Doll, W. E. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
     Drake, S. M. (1991). How our team dissolved the boundaries. Educational Leadership, 49（2）, 20-22.
     Drake, S. M. (1992). A story model: an integrated curriculum project. Ontario: Catharines.
     Drake, S. M. (1993). Planning integrated curriculum: The call to adventure. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
     Drake, S. M. (1998). Creating integrated curriculum: Proven Waysto increase student learning. California: Corwin.
     Doll, W. E. &Gough, N. (2000)(Eds.).Curriculum Visions. New York: Peter Lang.
     Eisner, E. W. (1991).The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.
     Eisner, E. W. (2002a).The educational imagination.(3rd Ed. ) New Jersey:Merrill Prentice Hall.
     Eisner, E. W. (2002b). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale university press./New Haven& London.
     Eisner, E. W. (1982). Cognition and curriculum. N.Y.: Longman.
     
     Eisner, E. W. (1993). Invitational conference on the hidden consequences of a national curriculum. Educational Researcher, 22(7), 38-39.
     Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn`t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297-324.
     Engel, S. (1995). The stories children tell. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
     Ediger, M. (1999). Reading in the primary grades. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 434 304)
     Ediger, Marlow. (1999). Data Driven Decision Making. College Student Journal 37:1 , 9-15.
     Eisner,E.(1981). The role of the arts in cognition and curriculum.Phi Delta Kappan,63(1),48-52.
     Eisner,E.(1985). The art of educational evaluation: A personal view. Philadelphia.PA:Falmer.
     Eisner ,E. (1996). Is “the art of teaching” a metaphor? In M.R.Kompt,W.R.Bond,D.Dworet&R.T. Book(Eds. ),Changing research and practice:Teachers’professionalism identities and knowledge. Philadelphia:The Falmer Press.
     Eisner,E. (2002).The arts and the creation of mind.New Heaven:Yale University Press.
     Egan-Robertson, A. & Willett, J. (1998). Students as ethnogrphers, thinking and doing ethnography: a bibligographic essay.” In Egan-Robertson, A. and Bloome, D.（eds）Students as Researchers of Culture and Language in their own Communities. NJ: Hampton Press.
     Egan-Robertson, A. and Bloome, D. (1998). “Introduction.” In Egan-Robertson, A. and Bloome, D.（eds）Students as Researchers of Culture and Language in their own Communities. NJ: Hampton Press.
     Egan-Robertson, A. and Bloome, D.（eds）(1998). Students as Researchers of Culture and Language in their own Communities. NJ: Hampton Press.
     Erikson, E. H. (1950/1953). Childhood and Society. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
     Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
     Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the Life Cycle. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
     Erikson, E. H., Erikson, J. M., & Kivnick, H. Q. (1997). Vital involvement in old age: The experience of old age in our time. W. W. Norton and Company.
     Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., & Smith, S.M. (1992). Creative Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Pres
     Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish-The Birth of the Prison. N. Y.:Pantheon Books.
     Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. C. Gordon (Ed.) N. Y.: Pantheon.
     Foshay, A. W. (2000). The curriculum: Purpose, substance, practice. N. Y.: Teachers College.
     Freire, P.(1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.
     Freire. P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Harmondsworth. Middle Sex. Penguin Books.
     Freire, P. (1976). A few notations about the world concientization. In R. Dale, et al., (Eds.), Schooling and capitalism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
     Freire,P.(1986).Pedagogy of the Oppressed. N.Y.:Continuum Books.
     Freire, P. & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the Word and the World. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
     Freire, P. (1994).Pedagogy of Hope – Reliving Pedagogy of The Oppressed. New York：Continuum.
     Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of Freedom—Ethics, Democracy, and Civic Courage. Lanham Boulder New York Oxford：Rowman & Littelfield publishers, Inc.
     Gadamer, H. G.(1975). Truth and Method. New York: Continuum.
     Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind. New York, NY: Simon &Schuster.
     Gass, M. A. (1993). The evolution of processing adventure therapy experiences. In M. A. Gass (Ed.) Adventure therapy: Therapeutic applications of adventure programming (pp. 219-229). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
     Gadamer, H.G.(1994). Truth and Method. trans. by J. Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York.
     Garvey, C. (1977). Play. Cambridge, MA : Harvard.
     Gass, M. A.(1993). Adventure therapy：therapeutic applications of adventure programming . Dubuque, IA：Kendall/Hunt.
     Gergen, K. J. & Gergen, M. M. (1988)Narrative and the self as relationship. Advance Experimental Social Psychology. Vol17.Ny: Academic Press.
     Gergen, M. & Gergen, K. (2000). Qualitatve inquiry: tensions and transformations. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research(2nd ed.) (pp. 1025-1046). London: Sage.
     Gee, J. P. (2000). Discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
     Gee, J. P. (2000). An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. New York: Routledge.
     Gee, J. P., Michaels, S., & O’Connor M. C. (1992). Discourse analysis. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 227-291). San Diego: Academic Press.
     Gee, J. P., & Green, J. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-170.
     Gergen, K. J.(1973).Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26(2), 309-320.
     Gergen, K. J. (1990). Toward a Postmodern Psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 18(1), 23-34.
     Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction, London: SAGE.
     Greene, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. N.Y.: Teachers College Press.
     Greene, M. (1988a).The dialectic of freedom. N.Y.: Teachers College Press.
     Greene, M. (1988b).The artistic-aesthetic and curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(4), 283-296.
     Greene, M. (1992). The passions of pluralism. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
     Greene, M. (1971). Teaching for aesthetic experience. Toward an aesthetic education. Washington, DC: Music Educators National Conference Proceeding.
     Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination-Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
     Gibson, R.（1986）. Critical Theory and Education. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
     Giddens, A. (1997). The Third Way. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     Giddens, A. (1998). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     Giddens,A.（1989）.Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     Giroux, H.（1983）.Theory & Resistance In Education: A Pedagogy for the Opposition. Massachusette: Bergin & Garvey.
     Giroux,H.(1988). Teachers as Intellectuals-Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning. N.Y.: Bergin & Garvey.
     Giroux, H. A. (1988). Schooling for democracy: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. London & New York: Routledge.
     Giroux, H. A. & Simon, R. I. (1989). Popular culture, schooling and everyday life. Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey.
     Giroux, H. A. (1991). Modernism, postmodernism, and feminism: Rethinking the Boundaries of Educational Discourse. In H. A. Giroux (Ed.), Postmodernism, feminism, and cultural politic (pp.1-59). State University of New York Press.
     Giroux,H.(1992).Border Crossings-Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education. N.Y.:RKP. Westview Press.
     Giroux, H. (1992). Resisting Difference: Cultural Studies and the Discourse of Critical Pedagogy. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson & P. Treichler（eds.）, Cultural Studies (pp.199-212). New York: Routledge.
     Giroux, H. A. (1992).Border crossing：Cultural workers and the culture. London & New York: Routledge.
     Giroux, H. A. (1994). Disturbing pleasure: learning popular politics of education. London & N.Y.: Routledge.
     Giroux, H. A. & McLaren, P. (1994). Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies. London & N.Y.: Routledge.
     Giroux,H.(1997). Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope-Thery. CuHure and Schooling. OX:Weatview Press.
     Goffman,E.（1959）.The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
     Goffman,E.（1967）.Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
     Goffman,E.（1961）.Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
     Goffman,E.（1963）. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
     Goffman,E.（1971）.Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Harper & Row.
     Good, C. V. (1959). Dictionary of education. New York, NY : McGraw-Hill.
     Grove, R. & Short, E. C. (1991). Theoretical Inquiry: Components and Structure .In E. C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry (pp.221-224). Albany: State University of New York Press.
     Grumet, M. (1978). Songs and situations. In G. Willis(Ed.), Qualitative evaluation(pp. 274-315). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
     Grumet, M.R. (1988). Bitter Milk: Woman and Teaching. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
     Grumet, M. (1990). On the daffodils that come before the swallow dares. In E. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The Continuing Debate (pp. 101-120). New York: Teachers College Press.
     Grumet,M.(1990). Retrospective-Autobiraphy and the Analysis of Educational Experience,Cambridge Journal of Education.20:3.
     Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. NJ: McGraw-Hill.
     Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ. Buffalo, NewYork: Creative Education Foundation, Inc. Hocevar, D. & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy andcritique of measurement used in the study of creativity. In J.
     Guignon, Charles (1993). The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Habermas, J.（1979）. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
     
     Habermas, J.（1984）. The Theory of Communicative Action（T. McCarthy, Trans.）. Boston: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1981)
     Hartley S.(1997). Reschooling Society. N.Y.: The Falmer Press.
     Heath, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school. Language Society, 11, 49-76.
     Hekman, S. J. (1995). Moral voices, moral selves: Carol Gilligan and feminist moral theory. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
     Henderson,J.G., & Hawthrone, R.D.(1995). Transformative Curriculum Leadership. N.J.:Prentice Hall.
     hooks, bell(1994).Teaching to Transgress-Education as the Practice of Freedom. N.Y.:RKP.
     Hobbs, T. (1986) The Rogers interview, Changes: Journal of the Psychology and Psychotherapy Association
     Hobbs, T. (1992) Experiential Training: Practical Guidelines, London and New York, Routledge.
     Holt, M. (2002). This time to start the slow school movement. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(4), 264-271。
     Huebner, D. (1975). Curricular language and classroom meanings. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The Reconceptualists. (pp.217-237). Berkeley, CA.
     Huizinga, J. (1955), Homo Ludens—A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: The Beacon Press.
     Huebner, D. E. (1975). Curricular language and classroom meanings. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists (pp.217- 236). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
     Huebner, D. E. (1985). Spirituality and knowing. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching: The ways of knowing. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
     Huebner, D.(1975). The Tasks of the Curricular Theorist. In W. Pinar(Ed.),Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists(pp. 250-270). California: McCutchan.
     Henry A. Giroux,(1992). Boarder Crossings: Cultural Workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc.
     Hirsch, J., Klim, K. H., Relkin, N. R. & Lee, K. M. (1997). Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature, 388, 171-174.
     Hlewowitsh, P. S. & Wraga, W. G. (1995). Social class analysis in the early progressive tradition. Curriculum Inquiry, 25(1), 7-21.
     Hlewowitsh, P. S. (2000). The Common Unity and the Progressive Restoration of the Curriculum Field. In J. Glanz & L. S. Behar-Horenstein (Eds.), Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspectives (pp.54-69). London: Bergin & Garvey.
     Hunter, I. (1994). Rethinking the school. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
     
     Iannone, R. (1998). Art as a theoretical base for the postmodern curriculum. Clearing House, 72(2), 118-122.
     Ira Shor, (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     Jackson,P.W.（1968）.Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     Jameson（1997：93)
     Jameson, F. (1984). Foreword. In J. F. Lyotard, The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (pp. vii-xxv). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     Jencks, C.（1987）. What is post-modernism？（2nd enlarged, rev. ed.）New York: St. Martin’s Press.
     Jones, E.（1996) Masked Performance: The Play of Self and Other in Ritual and Theatre, Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P.
     Jung, C. G.（1963）Memories, Dreams, Reflections, Aniela Jaffe, ed., Richard and Clara Winston, trans.(New York: Pantheon.)
     Kanpol,B.(1997). Issues and Trends in Critical Pedagogy. N.J.: Hampton Press.
     Kearney, R.（1987）. Modern Movement in European Philosophy. Taipei, Taiwan: Simda Book Company.
     Keeves, J.P., Masters, G.N.（1999）. Advances in measurement in educational research and assessment. New York : Pergamon.
     Kesson, K. R. (1999). Toward a Curriculum of Mythopoetic Meaning. In J. G., Henderson, & K. R. Kesson, (Eds.). Understanding democratic curriculum leadership. New York: Teachers College Press. (HKa)
     Kincheloe, J. L., McLaren, P. & Steinberg, S. R. (1997). Series editors` foreword. In H. A. Giroux (Ed.), Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope. (pp.ix-xiv) Colorado:Westniew.
     Kincheloe, J. (1993). Toward a political politics of teacher thinking: Mapping the postmodern. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
     Kincheloe, J. (1998). Pinar’s Currere and Identity in Hyperreality: Grounding the Post-formal Nation of Intrapersonal Intelligence. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum toward new identities (pp.129-142). London & N. Y.: Garland.
     Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
     Kraft, R. J. & Sakofs, M. (1985). The theory of experiential education. Boulder, CO: Association for Experiential Education.
     Labov, W. (1982). The Social Stratification of English in New York City (3rd print). Washington D. C: Center for Applied Linguistics.
     Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1997). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1-4), 3-38.
     Lacan, J. (1978). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis: The seminar of Jacques Lacan Book XI. New York: Norton.
     Lacan, J. (1990). Television: A Challenge to the Psychoanalytic Establishment.? Ed. Joan Copjec. Trans. Denis Hollier, Rosalind Krauss, and Annette Michelson.? New York: Norton.
     Lave, J. & Wenger, E., (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
     Landy, R. (1993) Persona and Performance, London: Jessica Kingsley.
     Landy, R. (1986) Drama Therapy: Concepts and Practices, Springfield, IL, Charles C. Thomas.
     Lassahn,R. (1983). Paedagogische Anthropologie. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer Verlag.
     Lauritzen, C., & Jaeger, M. (1997). Integrating learning through story: The narrative curriculum. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers.
     Lamme, L. L. (1994). Stories form our past: making history come alive for children. Social Education, 58(3), 159-164.
     Levstik, L. S. (1986). The relationship between historical response & narrative in a sixth grade classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 14(1), 1-15.
     Levstik, L. S. (1995). Narrative constructions: cultural frames for history. The Social Studies, 86(3), 113-116.Leslie（1987）
     Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Tousand Oaks: Sage.
     Lincoln, Y. S. (1992). Curriculum studies and the traditions of inquiry: The Humanistic Tradition. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum. (pp.70-97). N.Y.: Macmilan.
     Lipman（1969）
     Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979)
     Lyotard, J. F. (1989). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
     Mann, S. (1992). Telling a life story: Issues for research. Management Education and Development, 23, 271-280.
     Meleau-Ponty, Maurice (1962) trans. Colin Smith, Phenomenology of Perception, London: Meleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964) The Primacy of Perception, U.S.: Northwestern UP.
     Macuse, H. (1972). Counter-Revolution and Revolt. Boston: BeaconPress.
     
     Martin Heidegger(1962/1927). Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. San Francisco: Harper and Row.
     Marsh, C. J. (1997). Planning, management and ideology: Key concepts for understanding curriculum. London: The Falmer Press.
     McCarthy, W. A.（1978）. The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
     Mclaren,P., P.Leonard(2000). Absent Discourses-Paulo Freire and the Dangerous Memories of Liberation, in Mclaren, Leonard(2000). Paulo Freire-A Critical Encounter.(eds.) N.Y.: RKP
     McLaren, P. (1994). Multiculturalism and the postmodern critique: Toward a pedagogy of resistance and transformation. In H. A. Giroux & P. Mclaren (Eds.), Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies. London & N.Y.：Routledge.
     McMillan, M.(1995). Education through the imagination. England : thoemmes Pres.
     Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
     Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
     Michaels, S. (1981). “Sharing time”: Children’s narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language Society, 10, 423-442.
     Minami, M., & McCabe, A. (1991). Haiku as a discourse regulation device: A stanza analysis of Japanese children’s personal narratives. Language in Society, 20, 577-599.
     Mishler, E.G. (1995). Models of narrative analysis: A typology. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 5(2), 87-123.
     Miller, J. P. (1988). The holistic curriculum. Ontario: Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
     Millar(1989).Poverty and the lone-parent：Thechallenge to social policy. Aldershot：Avebury.
     Miller, J. L.(1998). Biography,Education and Questions of the Private Voice, in C. Kride,(1998)Writing Educational Biography-Exporations in Qualitative Research.(ed.). N.Y.:Garland.
     Murray, Michael (1978). Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays, New Haven: Yale University Press.
     Ornstein, A. C. & Hunkins, F. P. (1998). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Oram（1989）
     Orr, D.(1992). Ecological literacy—Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany: Suny Press.
     Pinar, W. F. (1992). Dreamt into existence by others: Curriculum theory and school reform. Theory into Practice, 31(3), 228-235.
     
     Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P. & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding Curriculum: An introduction to study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. N.Y.: Peter Lang .
     Pinar, W.F., A. E. Pautz(1998). Construction Scars- Autobiographical Voice in Biography, In C. Kridel,ib.id.,
     Popkewitz,T.S.(2000). Globalization/ Regionalism, Knowledge and the Educational Practices. in Pokewitz,T.S. Educational Knowledge-Changing Relationship Between the State, Civic Society and the Educational Community. SUNY.
     Piaget, J. (1983). The Child’s Conception of the World. Totowa, New Jersey：Rowman & Allanheld.
     Piner,W.(ed.).(1975). Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
     Piner,W.& Grumet,M.(1976).Toward A Poor Curriculum. Dubuque, IA:Kendal/Hunt.
     Pinar, W. F. & Reynolds, W. M. & Slatley, P.& Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding Curriculum-An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary Discourses. (eds.)
     Pinar, W. F. (1998). The Passionate Mind of Maxine Grerne: I am not yet. London: Falmer Press.
     Phinney, F.C.（1972）. Professional growth opportunities for American teachers abroad. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganV
     Prakash, M. S. (1995). Ecological literacy for moral virtue—Orr on moral education for postmodern sustainability. Journal of Moral Education, 24(1), 3-18.
     Ricoeur, Paul. (1984) Time and Narrative, Vol. 1, tr. By Kathleen McLaughin & David. Pellauer. Chicago: The university of Chicago press. Chap.1,5,6.
     Riessman, C.K.（1993）. Qualitative studies in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
     Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
     Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
     Rudolf, A. M. (1975). Dilthey: Philosopher of the Human Studies. Princeton.
     Shubert , William H. (1992). Practitioners influence curriculum theory: Autobiographical reflections. Theory into Practice. 31(3), 236-244.
     Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1),1-23。
     
     Slavin, R. E.（1990）. Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools ： A best evidence synthesis. Re-view of Educational Research, 60, 3, 471-500.
     Sleary, L.（1978）. The professional growth continuum: A kaleidoscope. Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 14-17.
     Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era. N.Y.: Garland.
     Smith, C., L. K.(1998). Fiction, Fantasy, and Femininities: Popular Texts and Young Woman`s Literacies. In Carbon, Apple, ibid.
     Schubert, W. H., & Schubert, A. L. (1986). A dialogue with Ralph W. Tyler. Journal of Thought, 21(1), 91-118.
     Short, E. C. (1991). Introduction: Understanding Curriculum Inquiry .In E.C. Short (Ed.), Forms of Curriculum Inquiry (pp.1-25). Albany: State University of New York Press.
     Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum development in the postmodern era. N.Y.: Garland.
     Spehler, R. M. & Slattery, P. (1999).Voices of imagination: The artist as prophet in the process of social change. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2(1), 1-12.
     Teacher’s Life and Work. in W.Pinar(1998). Curriculum-Toward New I Goodson,I.(1998). Storying the Self-Life Politics and the Study of the dentity. N.Y.: Garland Pub.
     Thomas Sebeok（1960）
     Thomas, T. P. & Schubert, W. H. (1997) Recent curriculum theory: Proposals for understanding, critical praxis, inquiry and expansion. Educational Theory, 47(2), 261-285.
     Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Vallance, E. (1988). Aesthetic inquiry: Art criticism. In E. Short (Ed), Forms of curriculum inquiry (pp. 155-172). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
     Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann & G. Vaker, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Vygotsky（1998）
     Waters, W. & L Godzich, W.（1989）. Reading de Man reading. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     White, Hayden. (1972). The Structure of Historical Narrative, Cleo 1(2):5-20.
     White, Hayden. (1972). Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
     White, Hayden. (1987). The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
     Wittgenstein L. (1963). Philosophical Investigations. New York: The Macmillan Company.
     Willis, P. (1981). Learning to labor. Hampshire: Gower.
     Wraga, W. G. (1996). Toward a curriculum theory for the new century: essay review of Patric Slattery, Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era. Curriculum Studies, 28(4), 463-474		zh_TW