1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 影音分享網站使用者意圖之研究
A study of user intention on video sharing website
作者 張書勳
Chang, Shu Hsun
貢獻者 李有仁
Li, Eldon Y.
張書勳
Chang, Shu Hsun
關鍵詞 影音分享
科技接受模式
使用意圖
Video sharing
Technology Acceptance Model（TAM）
User intention
日期 2009
上傳時間 9-May-2016 15:18:06 (UTC+8)
摘要 網路科技不斷進步，服務創新與商業模式陸續推出。線上影音分享網站為目前當紅的領域，但對於網站該如何設計以及使用者為何使用影音分享網站都未有明確準則。因此本研究藉由科技接受行為相關理論的回顧，配合影音分享網站之特性，以Davis(1989)的科技接受模式為基礎，結合相關重要變數，提出概念性架構。目的為找出可能影響網站使用者的相關變數、並瞭解Web2.0影音網站使用者之使用意圖。
      實驗方法採用線上問卷方式，在回收的501份問卷中，得到492份有效問卷，以結構方程模式進行研究模式分析。分析結果顯示，研究模式之適配度均達到應有標準。
     研究結論章節中會說明本研究之管理意涵，並將研究結果提供給未來欲設立Web2.0影音分享網站的設計者，在網站建立初期，將有限資源投注在重要的變數上，使網站可達到最大效益。
As the advance of Internet technology continues new business models are emerging in the market. Online video sharing website is the hottest application nowadays, but there is little study on designing the website and why the users using the website. In this research, we propose a conceptual model based on the technology acceptance model developed by Davis (1989) and this model integrating the important variables due to the extant research of relevant theory of technology acceptance and characteristics of video sharing website. The data collection was used the online survey, and we got the 492 eligible data and the analysis was used the Structural Equation Model (SEM). According to the result, the model fit was qualified. This research will give some management implication for designers who want to set up a video sharing website, this research provides the information on how to invest the limited resource on the critical variables in order to maximize the service value in the conclusion section in this paper.
參考文獻 中文部分：
     1. 林致立、民90，虛擬社群的商業性應用：本質、分類、與關鍵議題，東吳大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
     2. 資訊工業策進會，2008台灣網友線上影音娛樂行為初探，於民國97年4月，由http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx取得。
     3. 資策會，2006，web2.0 創新應用案例集：科計畫服務新趨勢，財團法人資訊工業策進會。
     
     英文部分：
     1. Ahn, T. R., S., and Han, I. (2007) “The impact of Web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing,” Information and Management (44), pp: 263-275.
     2. Ajzen, I. (1985) From Intention to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavioral in Action Control: From Cognition to Behavioral, J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (Eds.), Springer Verlag, New York, pp: 11-39.
     3. Ajzen, I. (1991) “The theory of planned behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (50:2), pp.179-211.
     4. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. Understanding Attitude and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New York, 1980.
     5. Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz,R., Sawyer, A., and Wood, S. (1997) “Interactive Home Shopping: consumer, Retailer, and Manufatuerer Incentives to Participate in Eletronic Marletplace,” Journal of Marketing (61), pp: 38-53.
     6. Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi. Y. (1988) “On the evaluation of structural equation models,” Academic of Marketing Science (16) pp: 76-94.
     7. Bandura, A. (1982) “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency,” American Psychologist (37:2), pp.122-147.
     8. Bandura, A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman, New York, NY, 1997.
     9. Benbasat, I. and Barki, H. (2007) “Quo Vadis, TAM?” Journal of the Association for Information System (8:4), pp: 211-218.
     10. Bollen, K. A. and Long, S. L. Testing structural equation modeling. Newbury, UK: Sage Publication, 1993.
     11. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtssob, B., Ramirez, A., Dunbr, N. D., and Miczo, (2002) “Interactivity Model: Communication Process, Partner Assessments, and the Quality of Collaborative Work,” Journal of Management Information Systems (16:3), pp: 33-56.
     12. Byrne, B. M. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998.
     13. Carmines, E. G. and McIver, J. P. Analyzing models with unobservable variables. In G. W. Bohrnstedt and E. E. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement current issues (pp. 65-115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981.
     14. Compeau, D. R. and Higgins, C. A. (1995) “Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test,” MIS Quarterly (19:2), pp: 189-211.
     15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. JosseyBass, San Francisco, 1975.
     16. Davis, F. D. (1989) “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), pp.319-340.
     17. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989) “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science (35:8), pp: 982 -1003.
     18. Deighton, J. (1996) “The Future of Interactive Marketing,” Harvard Business Review (74), pp: 151-162.
     19. DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. (1992) “Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable,” Information Systems Research (3:1), pp: 60-95.
     20. DeLone, W. H., McLean, and E. R. (2003) “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information System Success: A Yen-Year Update,” Journal of Management Information Systems (19:4), pp: 9-30.
     21. Diamantopoulos, A. and Siguaw, J. A. Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Thousand Osks, CA: Sage, 2000.
     22. Eastin, M. A. and LaRose, R. L. (2000) “Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide,” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication (6:1), Available at: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/eastin.html.
     23. Ennew, C. T. and Binks, M. R.（1999）“Impact of Participative Service Relationships on Quality, Satisfaction and Retention: An Exploratory Study,” Journal of Business Research 46（2）, pp: 121-132.
     24. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intentions and behavior: an introduction to theory and research, Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
     25. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) "Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics," Journal of Marketing Research (18:3), pp: 382-388.
     26. Fornell, C. R. and Bookstein, F.L. (1982) "Two Structural Equation Model: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory," Journal of Marketing Research (19:4), pp: 440-452.
     27. French, J. R. P. and Raven, B. The bases of social power In D. Cartwright (Eds.) Studies in social power. Ann Arhor, MI: Institute for Social Research, pp: 150-167, 1959.
     28. Graham, P. (2005) “I first heard the phrase `Web 2.0` in the name of the Web 2.0 conference in 2004,” online available at http://www.paulgraham.com/web20.html , Accessed 11/2005.
     29. Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. Multivariate data analysis. (5th Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
     30. Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. Multivariate data analysis with readings. New York: MacMillan, 2000.
     31. Hansen, T. (2008) “Consumer values, the theory of planned behavior and online grocery shopping,” International Journal of Consumer Studies (32), pp: 128-137.
     32. Hayduk, L. A. Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.
     33. Heeter, C. (2000) “Interactivity in the Context of Designed Experience,” Journal of Interactive Advertising (1) Fall.
     34. Hrubes, D., Ajzen, I. and Daigle, J. (2001) “Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: An application of the theory of planned behavior,” Leisure Science (23), pp: 165-178.
     35. Hsieh, A. T. and Chang, W. T. (2004) “The Effect of Consumer Participation on Price Sensitivity,” The Journal of Consumer Affairs (48:4), pp.282-296.
     36. Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L. and Tam, K. Y. (1999) “Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology,” Journal of Management Information Systems (16:2), pp. 91-112.
     37. Izak Benvasat and Henri Barki, (2007) “Quo Vadis, TAM?” journal of the Association for Information System, (8:4), pp: 211-218.
     38. Jayawardhena, C. & Foley, P. (2000). Changes in banking Secure – The Case of Internet Banking in UK. Journal of Internet Research: Networking and Policy (10:1), pp: 19-30.
     39. John Musser with Tim O’Reilly and the O’Reilly Radar Team - Web 2.0 Principles and Best Practice (O’Reilly Radar, 2007)
     40. Johnson, G. J., Reunwe, G. C., and Kumar, A. (2006) “Interactivity and Its Facets Revisited,” Journal of Advertising (35:4), pp: 35-52.
     41. Katerattanakul, P. (2002). Framework of effective web site design for business-to-consumer internet commerce. INFOR, 40(1), pp: 57-69.
     42. Kelman, H. C. (1958) “Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change,” Journal of Conflict Resolution (2:1), pp: 51-60.
     43. Kelman, H. C. (1961) “Process of opinion change,” Public Opinion Quarterly, (25:1), pp: 57-78.
     44. King, W. R. and He, J (2006) “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model,” Information and Management (43), pp: 740-755.
     45. Koufaris, M. (2002) “Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior,” Information Systems Research (13:2), pp: 205-223.
     46. Kurtz,D. L. and Clow, K. E. Services Marketing. John Wiley & Sons. Inc., pp: 35-56., 1998.
     47. Kwon, N. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2005) “Modeling the factors affecting individuals` use of community networks: A theoretical explanation of community-based information and communication technology use,” JASIST (56:14), pp: 1525-1543.
     48. Kwon, N. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2008) “Modeling the Factors Affecting Individual’s Use of Community Networks: A Theoretical Explanation of Community-Based Information and Communication Technology Use,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (56:14), pp: 1525-1543.
     49. Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M.P., and Zhuang, Y. (2000) “The Technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web,” Decision Support Systems (29), pp: 269-282.
     50. Legrisa, P., Inghamb, J. and Collerette, P. (2003) "Why do People Use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model," Information & Management (40), pp.191-204.
     51. Liao, Ziqi, and Michael Tow Cheung (2001), "Internet-based e-shopping and Consumer Attitudes: An Empirical Study," Information and Management (38), pp: 299-306.
     52. Liu, C. and Arnett, K. P. “Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce,” Information and Management (38:1) 2000, pp.23-34.
     53. Long, J. S. Confirmatory factor analysis: A preface to LISREL. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1983.
     54. Ma, Q., and Liu, L. (2004) “The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Finding,” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (16:1), pp: 29-72.
     55. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. and Sugawara, H. M. (1996) “Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling,” Psychological Methods (1:2), pp: 130-149.
     56. Madu, C. N. and Madu, A. N. (2002) “Dimensions of e-quality,” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management (19:3), pp: 246-258.
     57. Mathieson, K. (1991) “Predicting user intentions” Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavioral,” Information Systems Research (2:3), pp: 173-191.
     58. McDonald, R. P. and Ho, M. R. (2002) “Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis,” Psychological Methods (7), pp: 64-82.
     59. Miniard, P. W. and Cohen, J. B. (1979) “Isolating attitudinal and normative influences in behavioral intention models,” Journal of Marketing Research (16), pp: 102-110.
     60. Moon, J. and Kim, Y. (2001) “Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context,” Information and Management (38), pp: 217-230.
     61. Moore, G. C. and Benbasat, I. (1991) “Development of an instrument to measure the perception of adopting an information technology innovation,” Information Systems Research (2), pp: 192-222.
     62. Negash, S., Ryan, T. and Igbaria, M. (2003) “Quality and Effectiveness in Web-Based Customer Support Systems,” Information and Management (40:8), pp: 757-768.
     63. Newhagen, J. E. and Sheizaf, R. (1996) ”Why Communication Researchers Should Study the Internet: A Dialogue,” Journal of Communication (46), pp: 4-13.
     64. Nunnally, J. C. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
     65. Nysveen, H., Pedersen, Per E., Thorbjornsen, H. (2008) “Intentions of Use Mobile Services: Antecedents and Cross-Service Comparisons” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (33:3), pp: 330-346.
     66. O`Reilly, T. “What Is Web 2.0,” online available at http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html , Accessed 09/30/2005.
     67. Peter, S. and McLean, E. R. (2009) “A meta-anaytic assessment of the DeLean and McLean IS successs model: An examination of IS successs at the individuall level,” Informaion and Management (46), pp: 159-166.
     68. Raine-Eudy, R. (2000) “Using structural equation modeling to test for differential reliability and validity: An empirical demonstration,” Structural Equation Modeling (7:1), pp: 124-141.
     69. Reid, E. “Virtual worlds: culture and imagination,” In: Jones, S.G., Editor, CyberSociety: computer-mediated communication and community, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp.164–183, 1995.
     70. Rigdon, E. (1995) “A necessary an sufficient identification rule for structural equation models estimated,” Multivariate Behavioral Research (30), pp: 359-282.
     71. Rogers, E. M. Communication Technology: The New Media in Society, New York: Free Press, 1986.
     72. Schepers, J. and Wetzels, M. (2007) “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects,” Information and Management (44), pp: 90-103.
     73. Schifter, D. E. and Ajzen, I. (1985) “Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (49:3), pp.843-851.
     74. Seddon, P. B. and Kiew, M. Y. “A partial test and development of DeLone and McLean’s model of IS success,” Australian Journal of Information Systems (4:1) 1996, pp.90-104.
     75. Steuer, J. (1992) “Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Tellpresence,” Journal of Communication (42), pp: 73-93.
     76. Tan, M. and Teo, T. (2000) “Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking,” Journal of the AIS (1:5), pp: 1-44.
     77. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. (1995a) “Assessing IT Usage: The role of prior experience,” MIS Quarterly (19:4), pp.561-570.
     78. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. (1995b) “Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models,” Information Systems Research (6:2), pp: 144-176.
     79. Tim O"Reilly （2005） ，O"Reilly Media，online available：http://www.oreillynet.com
     80. Venkatesh, V. (2000) “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model” Information Systems Research (11:4), pp: 342-365.
     81. Venkatesh, v. and Bala, H. (2008) “Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions,” Decision Sciences (39:2), pp: 273-312.
     82. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000) “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal studies,” Management Science (46:2), pp.186-204.
     83. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2003) “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS Quarterly (27:3), pp.425-478.
     84. Wang, Yi-Shun. (2008). “Assessing e-commerce systems success: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success,” Information Systems Journal (18:5), pp: 529-557.
     85. Warshaw, P. R. (1980) “A new model for predicting behavioral intentions: An alternative to fishbein,” Journal of Marketing Research (17), pp: 153-172.
     86. Warshaw, P. R. (1980) “A new model for predicting behavioral intentions: An alternative to fishbein,” Journal of Marketing Research, (17), pp: 153-172.
     87. Webster, J. and Martocchio, J. J. (2000) “Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications,” MIS Quarterly (16:2) pp: 201-226.
     88. Wheaton, B. (1987) “Assessment of fit in overridden models with latent variables,” Sociological Methods and Research (16), pp: 118-154.
     89. Williams, F., Rice, R. E., and Rogers, E. M. Research Methods and the New Media, New York: Free Press, 1988.
     90. Wixom, B. H. and Todd, P. A. (2005) “A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance,” Information System Research (16:1), pp: 85-102.
     91. Yang, Z. Peterson, R. T. and Huang, L. (2001) “Taking the pulse of Internet Pharmacies: online consumers speak out on pharmacy services,” Marketing Health Services (21:2), pp: 4-10.
     92. Zack, M. H. (1993) “Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups,” Information Systems Research (4), pp: 207-239.
     93. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A. and Malhotra (2001) “A conceptual framework for understanding e-service quality: implication for future research and managerial practice,” working paper, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
資訊管理學系
96356011
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096356011
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 李有仁zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Li, Eldon Y.en_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張書勳zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chang, Shu Hsunen_US
dc.creator (作者) 張書勳zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chang, Shu Hsunen_US
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-May-2016 15:18:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-May-2016 15:18:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-May-2016 15:18:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0096356011en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95161-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 資訊管理學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96356011zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 網路科技不斷進步，服務創新與商業模式陸續推出。線上影音分享網站為目前當紅的領域，但對於網站該如何設計以及使用者為何使用影音分享網站都未有明確準則。因此本研究藉由科技接受行為相關理論的回顧，配合影音分享網站之特性，以Davis(1989)的科技接受模式為基礎，結合相關重要變數，提出概念性架構。目的為找出可能影響網站使用者的相關變數、並瞭解Web2.0影音網站使用者之使用意圖。
      實驗方法採用線上問卷方式，在回收的501份問卷中，得到492份有效問卷，以結構方程模式進行研究模式分析。分析結果顯示，研究模式之適配度均達到應有標準。
     研究結論章節中會說明本研究之管理意涵，並將研究結果提供給未來欲設立Web2.0影音分享網站的設計者，在網站建立初期，將有限資源投注在重要的變數上，使網站可達到最大效益。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) As the advance of Internet technology continues new business models are emerging in the market. Online video sharing website is the hottest application nowadays, but there is little study on designing the website and why the users using the website. In this research, we propose a conceptual model based on the technology acceptance model developed by Davis (1989) and this model integrating the important variables due to the extant research of relevant theory of technology acceptance and characteristics of video sharing website. The data collection was used the online survey, and we got the 492 eligible data and the analysis was used the Structural Equation Model (SEM). According to the result, the model fit was qualified. This research will give some management implication for designers who want to set up a video sharing website, this research provides the information on how to invest the limited resource on the critical variables in order to maximize the service value in the conclusion section in this paper.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝辭 1
     摘要 2
     第一章 緒論 8
     第一節 研究背景與動機 8
     第二節 研究目的 9
     第三節 研究範圍 10
     第四節 論文架構與研究流程 10
     第二章 文獻探討 13
     第一節 Web 2.0 13
     一、 Web2.0的起源 13
     二、 Web 2.0的定義 13
     第二節 科技接受行為之相關理論 17
     一、 理性行為理論 (Theory of Reasoned Action, TRA) 17
     二、 計畫行為理論 (Theory of Planned Behavior, TPB) 18
     三、 科技接受模式 (Technology Acceptance Model, TAM) 20
     四、 科技接受模式2（Technology Acceptance Model 2, TAM2） 23
     五、 科技接受模式3 (Technology Acceptance Model3, TAM3) 26
     六、 資訊系統成功模式 28
     小結 28
     第三章 研究方法 31
     第一節 概念性架構 31
     第二節 研究假說 32
     第三節 研究變數與操作型定義 40
     第四節 問卷設計 42
     第五節 調查方法 49
     第六節 驗證方法 49
     第四章 研究結果 53
     第一節 樣本結構分析 53
     第二節 敘述統計分析 56
     第三節 問卷信度分析 62
     第四節 問卷效度分析 63
     第五節 模式驗證與配適度分析 66
     第五章 研究結論 71
     第一節 結論 71
     第二節 管理意涵與理論貢獻 73
     一、 管理意涵 73
     二、 理論貢獻 75
     第三節 未來研究方向與建議 76
     參考文獻 77
     附件1：研究問卷 84
     附件2：構面相關係數表 90		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096356011en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 影音分享zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 科技接受模式zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 使用意圖zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Video sharingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Technology Acceptance Model（TAM）en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) User intentionen_US
dc.title (題名) 影音分享網站使用者意圖之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A study of user intention on video sharing websiteen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分：
     1. 林致立、民90，虛擬社群的商業性應用：本質、分類、與關鍵議題，東吳大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
     2. 資訊工業策進會，2008台灣網友線上影音娛樂行為初探，於民國97年4月，由http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx取得。
     3. 資策會，2006，web2.0 創新應用案例集：科計畫服務新趨勢，財團法人資訊工業策進會。
     
     英文部分：
     1. Ahn, T. R., S., and Han, I. (2007) “The impact of Web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing,” Information and Management (44), pp: 263-275.
     2. Ajzen, I. (1985) From Intention to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavioral in Action Control: From Cognition to Behavioral, J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (Eds.), Springer Verlag, New York, pp: 11-39.
     3. Ajzen, I. (1991) “The theory of planned behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (50:2), pp.179-211.
     4. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. Understanding Attitude and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New York, 1980.
     5. Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz,R., Sawyer, A., and Wood, S. (1997) “Interactive Home Shopping: consumer, Retailer, and Manufatuerer Incentives to Participate in Eletronic Marletplace,” Journal of Marketing (61), pp: 38-53.
     6. Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi. Y. (1988) “On the evaluation of structural equation models,” Academic of Marketing Science (16) pp: 76-94.
     7. Bandura, A. (1982) “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency,” American Psychologist (37:2), pp.122-147.
     8. Bandura, A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman, New York, NY, 1997.
     9. Benbasat, I. and Barki, H. (2007) “Quo Vadis, TAM?” Journal of the Association for Information System (8:4), pp: 211-218.
     10. Bollen, K. A. and Long, S. L. Testing structural equation modeling. Newbury, UK: Sage Publication, 1993.
     11. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtssob, B., Ramirez, A., Dunbr, N. D., and Miczo, (2002) “Interactivity Model: Communication Process, Partner Assessments, and the Quality of Collaborative Work,” Journal of Management Information Systems (16:3), pp: 33-56.
     12. Byrne, B. M. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998.
     13. Carmines, E. G. and McIver, J. P. Analyzing models with unobservable variables. In G. W. Bohrnstedt and E. E. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement current issues (pp. 65-115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981.
     14. Compeau, D. R. and Higgins, C. A. (1995) “Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test,” MIS Quarterly (19:2), pp: 189-211.
     15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. JosseyBass, San Francisco, 1975.
     16. Davis, F. D. (1989) “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), pp.319-340.
     17. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989) “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science (35:8), pp: 982 -1003.
     18. Deighton, J. (1996) “The Future of Interactive Marketing,” Harvard Business Review (74), pp: 151-162.
     19. DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. (1992) “Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable,” Information Systems Research (3:1), pp: 60-95.
     20. DeLone, W. H., McLean, and E. R. (2003) “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information System Success: A Yen-Year Update,” Journal of Management Information Systems (19:4), pp: 9-30.
     21. Diamantopoulos, A. and Siguaw, J. A. Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Thousand Osks, CA: Sage, 2000.
     22. Eastin, M. A. and LaRose, R. L. (2000) “Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide,” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication (6:1), Available at: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/eastin.html.
     23. Ennew, C. T. and Binks, M. R.（1999）“Impact of Participative Service Relationships on Quality, Satisfaction and Retention: An Exploratory Study,” Journal of Business Research 46（2）, pp: 121-132.
     24. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intentions and behavior: an introduction to theory and research, Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
     25. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) "Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics," Journal of Marketing Research (18:3), pp: 382-388.
     26. Fornell, C. R. and Bookstein, F.L. (1982) "Two Structural Equation Model: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory," Journal of Marketing Research (19:4), pp: 440-452.
     27. French, J. R. P. and Raven, B. The bases of social power In D. Cartwright (Eds.) Studies in social power. Ann Arhor, MI: Institute for Social Research, pp: 150-167, 1959.
     28. Graham, P. (2005) “I first heard the phrase `Web 2.0` in the name of the Web 2.0 conference in 2004,” online available at http://www.paulgraham.com/web20.html , Accessed 11/2005.
     29. Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. Multivariate data analysis. (5th Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
     30. Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. Multivariate data analysis with readings. New York: MacMillan, 2000.
     31. Hansen, T. (2008) “Consumer values, the theory of planned behavior and online grocery shopping,” International Journal of Consumer Studies (32), pp: 128-137.
     32. Hayduk, L. A. Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.
     33. Heeter, C. (2000) “Interactivity in the Context of Designed Experience,” Journal of Interactive Advertising (1) Fall.
     34. Hrubes, D., Ajzen, I. and Daigle, J. (2001) “Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: An application of the theory of planned behavior,” Leisure Science (23), pp: 165-178.
     35. Hsieh, A. T. and Chang, W. T. (2004) “The Effect of Consumer Participation on Price Sensitivity,” The Journal of Consumer Affairs (48:4), pp.282-296.
     36. Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L. and Tam, K. Y. (1999) “Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology,” Journal of Management Information Systems (16:2), pp. 91-112.
     37. Izak Benvasat and Henri Barki, (2007) “Quo Vadis, TAM?” journal of the Association for Information System, (8:4), pp: 211-218.
     38. Jayawardhena, C. & Foley, P. (2000). Changes in banking Secure – The Case of Internet Banking in UK. Journal of Internet Research: Networking and Policy (10:1), pp: 19-30.
     39. John Musser with Tim O’Reilly and the O’Reilly Radar Team - Web 2.0 Principles and Best Practice (O’Reilly Radar, 2007)
     40. Johnson, G. J., Reunwe, G. C., and Kumar, A. (2006) “Interactivity and Its Facets Revisited,” Journal of Advertising (35:4), pp: 35-52.
     41. Katerattanakul, P. (2002). Framework of effective web site design for business-to-consumer internet commerce. INFOR, 40(1), pp: 57-69.
     42. Kelman, H. C. (1958) “Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change,” Journal of Conflict Resolution (2:1), pp: 51-60.
     43. Kelman, H. C. (1961) “Process of opinion change,” Public Opinion Quarterly, (25:1), pp: 57-78.
     44. King, W. R. and He, J (2006) “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model,” Information and Management (43), pp: 740-755.
     45. Koufaris, M. (2002) “Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior,” Information Systems Research (13:2), pp: 205-223.
     46. Kurtz,D. L. and Clow, K. E. Services Marketing. John Wiley & Sons. Inc., pp: 35-56., 1998.
     47. Kwon, N. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2005) “Modeling the factors affecting individuals` use of community networks: A theoretical explanation of community-based information and communication technology use,” JASIST (56:14), pp: 1525-1543.
     48. Kwon, N. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2008) “Modeling the Factors Affecting Individual’s Use of Community Networks: A Theoretical Explanation of Community-Based Information and Communication Technology Use,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (56:14), pp: 1525-1543.
     49. Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M.P., and Zhuang, Y. (2000) “The Technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web,” Decision Support Systems (29), pp: 269-282.
     50. Legrisa, P., Inghamb, J. and Collerette, P. (2003) "Why do People Use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model," Information & Management (40), pp.191-204.
     51. Liao, Ziqi, and Michael Tow Cheung (2001), "Internet-based e-shopping and Consumer Attitudes: An Empirical Study," Information and Management (38), pp: 299-306.
     52. Liu, C. and Arnett, K. P. “Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce,” Information and Management (38:1) 2000, pp.23-34.
     53. Long, J. S. Confirmatory factor analysis: A preface to LISREL. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1983.
     54. Ma, Q., and Liu, L. (2004) “The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Finding,” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (16:1), pp: 29-72.
     55. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. and Sugawara, H. M. (1996) “Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling,” Psychological Methods (1:2), pp: 130-149.
     56. Madu, C. N. and Madu, A. N. (2002) “Dimensions of e-quality,” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management (19:3), pp: 246-258.
     57. Mathieson, K. (1991) “Predicting user intentions” Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavioral,” Information Systems Research (2:3), pp: 173-191.
     58. McDonald, R. P. and Ho, M. R. (2002) “Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis,” Psychological Methods (7), pp: 64-82.
     59. Miniard, P. W. and Cohen, J. B. (1979) “Isolating attitudinal and normative influences in behavioral intention models,” Journal of Marketing Research (16), pp: 102-110.
     60. Moon, J. and Kim, Y. (2001) “Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context,” Information and Management (38), pp: 217-230.
     61. Moore, G. C. and Benbasat, I. (1991) “Development of an instrument to measure the perception of adopting an information technology innovation,” Information Systems Research (2), pp: 192-222.
     62. Negash, S., Ryan, T. and Igbaria, M. (2003) “Quality and Effectiveness in Web-Based Customer Support Systems,” Information and Management (40:8), pp: 757-768.
     63. Newhagen, J. E. and Sheizaf, R. (1996) ”Why Communication Researchers Should Study the Internet: A Dialogue,” Journal of Communication (46), pp: 4-13.
     64. Nunnally, J. C. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
     65. Nysveen, H., Pedersen, Per E., Thorbjornsen, H. (2008) “Intentions of Use Mobile Services: Antecedents and Cross-Service Comparisons” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (33:3), pp: 330-346.
     66. O`Reilly, T. “What Is Web 2.0,” online available at http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html , Accessed 09/30/2005.
     67. Peter, S. and McLean, E. R. (2009) “A meta-anaytic assessment of the DeLean and McLean IS successs model: An examination of IS successs at the individuall level,” Informaion and Management (46), pp: 159-166.
     68. Raine-Eudy, R. (2000) “Using structural equation modeling to test for differential reliability and validity: An empirical demonstration,” Structural Equation Modeling (7:1), pp: 124-141.
     69. Reid, E. “Virtual worlds: culture and imagination,” In: Jones, S.G., Editor, CyberSociety: computer-mediated communication and community, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp.164–183, 1995.
     70. Rigdon, E. (1995) “A necessary an sufficient identification rule for structural equation models estimated,” Multivariate Behavioral Research (30), pp: 359-282.
     71. Rogers, E. M. Communication Technology: The New Media in Society, New York: Free Press, 1986.
     72. Schepers, J. and Wetzels, M. (2007) “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects,” Information and Management (44), pp: 90-103.
     73. Schifter, D. E. and Ajzen, I. (1985) “Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (49:3), pp.843-851.
     74. Seddon, P. B. and Kiew, M. Y. “A partial test and development of DeLone and McLean’s model of IS success,” Australian Journal of Information Systems (4:1) 1996, pp.90-104.
     75. Steuer, J. (1992) “Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Tellpresence,” Journal of Communication (42), pp: 73-93.
     76. Tan, M. and Teo, T. (2000) “Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking,” Journal of the AIS (1:5), pp: 1-44.
     77. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. (1995a) “Assessing IT Usage: The role of prior experience,” MIS Quarterly (19:4), pp.561-570.
     78. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. (1995b) “Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models,” Information Systems Research (6:2), pp: 144-176.
     79. Tim O"Reilly （2005） ，O"Reilly Media，online available：http://www.oreillynet.com
     80. Venkatesh, V. (2000) “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model” Information Systems Research (11:4), pp: 342-365.
     81. Venkatesh, v. and Bala, H. (2008) “Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions,” Decision Sciences (39:2), pp: 273-312.
     82. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000) “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal studies,” Management Science (46:2), pp.186-204.
     83. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2003) “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS Quarterly (27:3), pp.425-478.
     84. Wang, Yi-Shun. (2008). “Assessing e-commerce systems success: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success,” Information Systems Journal (18:5), pp: 529-557.
     85. Warshaw, P. R. (1980) “A new model for predicting behavioral intentions: An alternative to fishbein,” Journal of Marketing Research (17), pp: 153-172.
     86. Warshaw, P. R. (1980) “A new model for predicting behavioral intentions: An alternative to fishbein,” Journal of Marketing Research, (17), pp: 153-172.
     87. Webster, J. and Martocchio, J. J. (2000) “Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications,” MIS Quarterly (16:2) pp: 201-226.
     88. Wheaton, B. (1987) “Assessment of fit in overridden models with latent variables,” Sociological Methods and Research (16), pp: 118-154.
     89. Williams, F., Rice, R. E., and Rogers, E. M. Research Methods and the New Media, New York: Free Press, 1988.
     90. Wixom, B. H. and Todd, P. A. (2005) “A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance,” Information System Research (16:1), pp: 85-102.
     91. Yang, Z. Peterson, R. T. and Huang, L. (2001) “Taking the pulse of Internet Pharmacies: online consumers speak out on pharmacy services,” Marketing Health Services (21:2), pp: 4-10.
     92. Zack, M. H. (1993) “Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups,” Information Systems Research (4), pp: 207-239.
     93. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A. and Malhotra (2001) “A conceptual framework for understanding e-service quality: implication for future research and managerial practice,” working paper, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.		zh_TW