1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of International Affairs
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 國家認同與兩岸關係：經濟自由化vs.政治民主化
NATIONAL IDENTITIES AND CROSS-STRAIT RELATIONS: ECONOMIC LIBERALIZATION vs. POLITICAL DEMOCRATIZATION
作者 狄雷克
Uygül, Dilek
貢獻者 袁易　
I , Yuan
狄雷克
Uygül, Dilek
關鍵詞 中國
臺灣
中華人民共和國
中華民國
兩岸關係
社會建構主義
自由化
民主化
國家認同
國家利益
國家制度
China
Taiwan
the PRC
the ROC
Cross-Strait Relations
Social Constructivism
Liberalization
Democratization
National Identities
National Interests
Institutions
日期 2010
上傳時間 9-May-2016 15:45:44 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究的目的在於分析國家認同(身分)，對於中國和臺灣之間所謂「國與國」關係的影響。兩岸關係的和暖始於１９７０及１９８０年代末期開始的「自由化」與「民主化」過程，這提供了雙方交流的機會，特別是在１９８７年中華民國政府開放經貿和民間交流，如一般民眾赴大陸探親。更重要的是，當臺灣的一黨專政消逝後，臺灣人民以民主改革重塑了政治環境，而這種民主改革也使臺灣政治產生了新的變化。

本研究認為，就「自由化」與「民主化」的過程而言，不僅是甚於政權的移轉，而且也包括某些政治之外的因素改變了意識形態，最明顯的因素即是經濟。自從１９７９年兩岸的軍事衝突結束後，雖然雙方並未建立有效且特久的和平機制，但在此時期，兩岸都經歷了一些社會自由化及著重經濟發展的政策變化。本文將透過三個焦點問題以理解「自由化」、「民主化」與兩岸之間的關係：

i.兩岸於１９７０年代後期及１９８０年代，在個別強人領導之下，國家認同（身分）的影響為何？
ii.這些發展在兩個中國實體的內部如何影響兩岸關係？
iii.未來兩岸如何調整政策以促進和暖的局勢？

本文將採用溫特的社會建構論做為研究的理論框架，亦即建構主義中的三個Ｉ：認同（身分）、利益和制度。以社會建構論應用在兩岸關係上是有其意義的，同時也顧及了國際關係理論做為一種積累式學科的特殊性。根據社會建構論指出，國家認同（身分）是透過文化規則以塑造，如１９８０年代臺灣人民對於民主的認知，及１９７０年代之後中國自由化的過程，都是其政治文化的一部分。因此，國家認同（身分）在以利益為驅動的國際關係下，必須以「國與國」的關係所取代。本文將以１９７０－８０年代兩岸關係做為案列，解釋國家認同（身分）在「國與國」的關係中的使用。
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of the state identity in the state-to-state relations of mainland China and Taiwan. Following the ‘liberalization’ process on the mainland in the late 1970s and Taiwan’s ‘democratization’ of the 1980s, a thawing of relations between the PRC and the ROC was effected. The subsequent exchange between both sides of the Taiwan Strait has included such important changes as the ROC government’s lifting of travel and trade-related restrictions to mainland China in 1987. More importantly, when one-party rule was lifted the people of Taiwan were given the chance to shape the political landscape with the help of democratic reforms which gave a new substance to the political nature of the exchange.

The focal point of this study will be the argument that the ‘democratization’ and the ‘liberalization’ processes on both sides is not only because of the regime change but also the ideological shift caused by a number of extra-political factors, most notably economic factors. Although no effective mechanism for long-lasting peace has been established in Cross-Strait Relations since the end of the militarized disputes between the PRC and the ROC in 1979, this period also witnessed a shift in policy towards social liberalization along with an increased emphasis on economic development on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. I will approach the relationship between ‘democratization’ or ‘liberalization’ and Cross-Strait Relations through three focal questions:
i.How has it been the effect of state identity in the late 1970s and 1980s in China and in Taiwan under their respective leaderships?
ii.How did these developments within the two Chinese entities affect relations across the Taiwan Strait?
iii.How will both sides modify their policies in the future to create circumstances more conducive to reconciliation with the other side?

I intend to use Wendt`s Social Constructivist theory as the theoretical framework of the research on the basis of “3 I’s of Social Constructivism”, namely ‘Identity, Interest and Institution’. The application of Social Constructivism as an International Relations theory to Cross-Strait Relations aims to be relevant and persuasive considering the ad hoc –event driven– characteristic of International Relations as a discipline being accumulative. In Social Constructivism, state identities shape through the cultural norms, such as the Taiwanese perception of democracy as part of its own political culture in the early 1980s and the liberalization process of China from the late 1970s onwards. The state identity, therefore, makes room for the state-to-state relations under the International Relations driven by the national interest. The effect of the state identity in the state-to-state relations in the case study of Cross-Strait Relations, in the late 1970s and in the late 1980s respectively, will be comprehensively subjected to examination in my research.
參考文獻 Books:
 Brown, Melissa J. 2004. Is Taiwan Chinese?: The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
 Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
 Bush, Richard C. 2006. Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
 Bush, Richard C., and Micheal O’Hanlon. 2007. A War Like No Other: The Truth About China’s Challenge to America. New York: Wiley.
 Carpenter, T. Galen. 2006. America’s Coming War with China: A Collision Course over Taiwan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
 Cole, Bernard D. 2006. Taiwan’s Security: History and Prospects. London: Routledge.
 Coogan, Tim Pat. 2002. Michael Collins: The Man Who Made Ireland. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
 Copper, John F. 2006. Playing with Fire: The Looming War with China over Taiwan. 21-36. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International General Interest.
 Fewsmith, Joseph. 2001. Elite Politics in Contemporary China. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.
 Gill, Bates. 2007. Rising Star: China’s New Security Diplomacy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
 Granatstein, J.L., and Robert Bothwell. 1991. Pirouette: Pierre Trudeau and Canadian Foreign Policy. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
 Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
 Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.
 Kuhn, Phillip A. 2008. Chinese Among Others: Emigration in Modern Times. Singapore: NUS Press.
 Onuf, Nicholas G. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Colombia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
 Roy, Denny. 2003. Taiwan: A Political History. New York: Cornell University Press.
 Segal, Ronald. 1975. Whose Jerusalem?: The Conflicts of Israel. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.
 Shirk, S. 2007. China: Fragile Superpower: How China’s Internal Politics Could Derail Its Peaceful Rise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 Taylor, Jay. 2000 The Generalissmo’s Son - Chiang Chingkuo and the Revolutions in China and Taiwan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
 Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
 Wang, James. C.F. 1980. Contemporary Chinese Politics: An Introduction. Hilo: University of Hawaii Press.
 Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Yatsen, Sun. 1920. International Development of China. Shanghai: The Commercial Press Ltd.
 Yiren, Rong. 1997. China in the Twenty-First Century: Politics, Economy and Society, edited by Fumio Itoh. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
 Zhang, Qiyun. 1959. An Outline History of Taiwan. Taipei: China Culture Publishing Foundation.

Chapters in an Edited Volume:
 Bush, Richard. 2005. “Lee Tenghui and ‘Separatism’.” in Dangerous Strait: the U.S.-Taiwan-China Crisis, edited by Nancy Bernkopf Tucker, 70-93. New York: Columbia University Press.
 Fierke, Karin M. 2007. “Constructivism.” in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, edited by Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Smith Smith, 166-185. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 Marsh, Robert. 2002. “National Identity and Ethnicity in Taiwan: Some Trends in the 1990s.” in Memories of the Future: National Identity Issues and the Search for a New Taiwan, edited by Stephan Corcuff, 144-59. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
 Shaw, Chonghai. 2001. “The Possibility of Cross-Strait Political Negotiation.” in Remarking the Chinese State: Strategies, Society, and Security, edited by Chen Min-Zhao and Brace J. Dickson, 257-278. London and New York: Routledge.
 Tucker, Nancy Bernkopf. 2005. “Dangerous Strait: Introduction.” in Dangerous Strait: the U.S.-Taiwan-China Crisis, edited by Nancy Bernkopf Tucker, 1-16. New York: Columbia University Press.
 Yu, Maochun. 2006. “Political and Military Factors Determining China’s Use of Force.” in If China Attacks Taiwan: Military Strategy, Politics and Economics, edited by Steve Y.S. Tsang, 17-35. New York: Routledge.

Articles in a Periodical and/or Online Journal:
 Adler, Emmanuel. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 3, No. 3 (1997): 319-363.
 Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore. “The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations.” International Organization, Vol. 53, No. 4 (Autumn 1999): 699-732.
 Cabestan, Jean-Pierre. “Taiwan’s Mainland Policy: Normalization, Yes; Reunification, Later.” The China Quarterly, No. 148, Special Issue: Contemporary Taiwan, (Dec., 1996): 1260-1283.
 Checkel, Jeffrey T. “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory.” World Politics, Vol. 50 (January 1998): 324-348.
 Chelu, Dana. “What is the Future for IR Theory? Does it need a Radical Review?” Journal of Politics and Law, Vol. 1 No. 2 (June 2008): 64-67.
http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jpl/article/viewFile/741/712.
 Chen, Qimao. “The Taiwan Issue and the Sino-US Relations: A PRC View.” Asian Survey, Vol. 27, No. 11 (November 1987): 1161-1175.
 “China and Taiwan: Uneasy Détente.” International Crisis Group, Asia Briefing, No. 42 (Seoul/Brussels, 21 Sept. 2005): 1-15.
http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/asia/taiwan_strait/b042_china_and_taiwan_uneasy_detente.pdf.
 Chiou, C.L. “Politics of Alienation and Polarization: Taiwan’s Tangwai in the 1980s.” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, Vol. 18, No. 3 (1986): 16-28.
 Dittmer, Lowell. “Taiwan and the Issue of National Identity.” Asian Survey, Vol. 44, No. 4 (Jul. - Aug., 2004): 475-483.
 Doyle, Michael W. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 12, No. 3 (Summer 1983): 205-235.
 Fewsmith, Joseph. “Rule of Law in China: Chinese Law and Business – The Political Economy of China’s Transition.” The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society in collaboration with The Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford (2007): 1-8.
http://www.fljs.org/uploads/documents/Fewsmith_pb2%231%23.pdf.
 Friedberg, Aaron L., “The Future of US – China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?” International Security, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Fall 2005): 7-45.
 Godley, Michael R., “Socialism with Chinese Characters: Sun Yatsen and the International Development of China.” The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, No. 18 (July 1987):109-125.
 Harding, Harry. “The Concept of ‘Greater China’: Themes, Variations and Reservations.” The China Quarterly, No. 136 (Special Issue: Greater China) (Dec. 1993): 660-686.
 Harvard Group (Abdelal Rawi, Yoshiko M. Herrera, Alastair Iain Johnston, and Rose McDermott). “Identity as a Variable.” Perspectives on Politics, No. 4 (Dec. 2006): 695-711.
 Hu, Zuliu and Mohsin S. Khan. “Why Is China Growing So Fast?.” IMF Economic Issues, No. 8 (April, 1997): 1-10.
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/issues8/issue8.pdf.
 Kang, Xiaoguang. “China: Political Development and Political Stability in the Era of Reform.” The Chinese Economy, Vol. 35, No. 5 (2003): 6-92.
 Keohane, Robert O. and Lisa L. Martin, “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Summer 1995): 39-51.
 Li, Hongtu. “China’s Modernization: A Historical Survey.” Shanghai: East Chinese Normal University, (April 2007): 145-156.
http://w1.ens-lsh.fr/colloques/chine2004/china_modernization.pdf.
 Mearsheimer, John J. “A Realist Reply.” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Summer 1995): 82-93.
 McClaran, John P., “US Arm Sales to Taiwan: Implications for the Future of Sino-US Relationship.” Asian Survey, Vol. 40, No. 4, (July – Aug. 2000): 622-640.
 Nathan, Andrew J., “China’s Goals in the Taiwan Strait.” The China Journal, No. 36, (July 1996): 87-93.
 Nye, Joseph S., “The Rise of China’s Soft Power.” The Wall Street Journal Asia, Belfast Center for Science and International Affairs, International Security Program, (29 Dec. 2005): 1.
http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/1499/riseofchinassoftpower.html.
 Rice, Edward E. “The Sino-US Détente: How Durable?” Asian Survey, Vol. 13, No. 9, (Sept. 1973):805-811.
 Ruggie, John. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.” International Organization, No. 52 (Autumn 1998): 855-885.
 State Council of the PRC, “The Taiwan Question and Reunification of China.” Beijing Review Vol. 36, No. 6 (September 6-12, 1993): i-viii.
 Walt, Stephen M. “International Relations: One World, Many Theories.” Foreign Policy, No. 110, Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge, (Spring 1998): 29-46.
 Wang, T. Y. “Taiwan’s Foreign Relations under Lee Tenghui’s Rule: 1988-2000.” American Asian Review Vol. 20, No. 1 (Spring 2002): 71-106.
 Wang, T. Y. and I-Chou Liu. “Contending Identities in Taiwan Implications for Cross-Strait Relations.” Asian Survey, Vol. 44, No. 4 (Jul. - Aug., 2004): 568-590.
 Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy is what States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2, (July 1992): 391-425.
 Wendt, Alexander. “Collective Identity Formation and the International State.” American Political Science Review, Vol. 88, No. 2, (June 1994): 384-396.
 Wendt, Alexander. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1, (Summer 1995): 71-81.
 Wu, Yushan. “Taiwan’s Domestic Politics and Cross-Strait Relations.” The China Journal, No. 53, Celebrating the Universities Service Centre for China Studies, Contemporary China Center, Australian National University, (Jan., 2005): 35-60.
 Wu, Yushan, “Theorizing on Relations across the Taiwan Strait: Nine Contending Approaches.” Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 9, No. 25, (2000): 407-428.
 Zhao, John Quansheng. “An Analysis of Unification: The PRC Perspective.” Asian Survey, Vol. 23, No. 10, (Oct. 1983): 1095-1114.

Newspaper Reports:
 “Chinese, U.S. presidents hold telephone talks on Taiwan, Tibet.” Xinhua Net, March 27, 2008.
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-03/27/content_7865209.htm.
 Gollust, David. “US says Taiwanese President’s Independence Remarks ‘Unhelpful’.” Voice of America News, March 5, 2007.
http://www.voanews.com.
 Lev, Samantha. “Chinese Lawyers’ Motion Defends Falun Gong in Court for First Time.” Epoch Times, October 25, 2007.
http://en.epochtimes.com/news/7-10-25/61180.html.
 “Presidential Office defends Ma.” Taipei Times, September 05, 2008. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2008/09/05/2003422339.
 “Taiwan opens up to mainland Chinese investors.” The Times, May 04, 2009. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/article6199775.ece.
 “Taiwan and China in ‘special relations’: Ma.” China Post, September 04, 2008. http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/china-taiwan%20relations/2008/09/04/173082/Taiwan-and.htm.
 Ting, Hoon. “Taiwan Must Cut out the Middleman.” Taipei Times, Friday, Jun 05, 2009.
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2009/06/05/2003445390.

Chinese-language Source:
 Wang, Yubin and Suhong Wang (王玉彬與王苏红). 1947. Battles over the Central Plains (Dashi Zhongyuan, 大势中原). Reportages on Revolutionary Struggle in China (Zhongguo geming douzheng baogao wenxue congshu, 中国革命斗争报告文学丛书). Dabie Mountain Series (Qianli yuejin dabie shanjuan, 千里跃进大别山卷). Beijing: PLA Publishing House (Beijing: Jiefangjun chubanshe, 北京：解放军出版社).
 Yang, Renjing. 1990. Hai Ming Wei zai Zhongguo (海明威在中國, Ernest Hemingway in China). Xiamen: Xiamen University Press.
 Zhonggong Shenzhen Shiwei Xuanchuanbu (中共深圳市委宣傳部). 1992. Deng Xiaoping yu Shenzhen (鄧小平與深圳, Deng Xiaoping and Shenzhen). Shenzhen: Haitian Chubanshe (深圳: 海天出版社).
 “Haixia Liangan Baoji huitan jiyao” (海峡两岸包机会谈纪要, Cross-Strait charter flights negotiation memorandum). Xinhua News Agency, June 13, 2008. http://news.xinhuanet.com/tw/2008-06/13/content_8360544.htm.
 “Hu Jintao hui jian Xiao Wanchang jiu Liangan jingji jiaoliu hezuo jiaohuan yijian” (胡锦涛会见萧万长 就两岸经济交流合作交换意见, Hu Jintao meets Vincent Siew; Exchange opinions on Cross-Strait economic exchange and co-operation). Xinhua News Agency, April 12, 2008.
http://www.gov.cn/ldhd/2008-04/12/content_943267.htm.
 “Ma Zongtong: Liangan guanxi shi xianshi guanxi” (馬總統：兩岸關係是現實關係, President Ma: Cross-Strait Relations are Relations Based on Current Reality). Central News Agency of the Republic of China, October 08, 2008. http://www.cna.com.tw/CNA/TodayTopicNews/TodayTopicNews.aspx?NewsID=200810070260.
 Mainland Affairs Council of the ROC. “Minzhong dui di er ci ‘Jiang-Chen huitan’ jiegou zhi kanfa” (民眾對第二次「江陳會談」結果之看法, Public view on the results of the second Chiang-Chen talks). http://www.mac.gov.tw/big5/mlpolicy/pos/9711/971109b.pdf.
 Mainland Affairs Council of the ROC. “Duideng, heping yu shuangying ─ Zhong Hua Min Guo dui Tezhu guo yu guo guanxi’ de lichang” (‘對等、和平 與雙贏 ─ 中華民國對「特殊國與國關係」的立場, Equality, peace and win-win ─ Republic of China’s position on “Special State-to-State Relations”). http://www.mac.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=49756&ctNode=5842&mp=4.
 Straits Exchange Foundation. “Hai jijin hui de chengli yu yange” (海基會的成立與沿革, The establishment of the SEF and its evolution). http://www.sef.org.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1548&CtNode=3798&mp=19.
 Su, Chi (蘇起). “‘Yi ge Zhongguo, ge ze biao shu’ gong shi de shishi” xu: “‘Yi ge Zhongguo, ge ze biaoshu’ gongshi de yiyi yu gongxian” (「『一個中國，各自表述』共識的史實」序： 「一個中國，各自表述」共識的意義與貢獻, The Abstract on “Realities of the ‘One China, Respective Interpretations’ Consensus”: The meaning and the contribution of the ‘One China, Respective Interpretations’ Consensus). Guo Zheng Fen Xi (國政分析, National Policy Foundation) No. 090-023 (November 4, 2002).
http://old.npf.org.tw/.
 Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council. “Haixia liangan guanxi xiehui zhangcheng” (海峽兩岸關係協會章程, ARATS Charter). http://www.gwytb.gov.cn:82/hx/hxzc.htm.
 “Taiwan gong chang dang shenqing 14 nian hou huozhun chengli” (臺灣共產黨申請14年後獲准成立, Communist Party of Taiwan allowed to set up after 14 years since its application). BBC Zhongwen Wang (英國廣播公司中文網, BBC Chinese website) July 21, 2008. http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/trad/hi/newsid_7510000/newsid_7518500/7518502.
 “Tigao renshi kanqing weihai bawo zhengce weihu wending” (提高认识 看清危害 把握政策 维护稳定, Enhance Knowledge; See Clearly the Harm; Hold on to Policies; Maintain Stability). People’s Daily, July 23, 1999.
 “Wu Nuobeier dezhu Ma zai pao Liangan hu bu fouren” (晤諾貝爾得主 馬再拋兩岸互不否認, Meeting Nobel laureates, Ma again speaks of mutual non-denial). Liberty Times, April 19, 2008. http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2008/new/apr/19/today-p3.htm.

Popular magazines:
 Dusen, Henry P. Van “China’s Crisis: The Future Peace of the U.S. and the World Depends upon the Outcome of an ‘Irreconcilable Conflict’,” Life Magazine, September 2, 1946, 36-37.
 Ramzy, Austin. “Who Shot Chen Shuibian?.” Time, March 14, 2005. http://www.time.com.
 Snyder, Jack. “One World, Rival Theories.” Foreign Policy, Nov/Dec 2004, 52-62.
http://www/foreignpolicy.com


Conference Papers:
 Acharya, Amitav. “International Relations Theory and Cross-Strait Relations.” Paper presented at The International Forum on Peace and Security in the Taiwan Strait. Taipei, Taiwan, July 26-28, 1999.
http://www.taiwansecurity.org/IS/Acharya-International-Relations-Theory-and-Cross-Strait-Relations.htm.
 Maliniak, Daniel, Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson, and Michael J. Tierney. “The International Relations Discipline, 1980-2006.” Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois, August/ September 2007.
http://irtheoryandpractice.wm.edu/projects/trip/TRIP.pdf.

Theses:
 Ergenç, Ceren. “Chinese Nation-Building and Sun Yatsen: A Study on 1911 Revolution in China.” M.S. Thesis in International Relations submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University. Ankara, Turkey, August 2005.

Online Resources:
 Democratic Progressive Party. “Chairman Chen Shuibian’s Resignation Speech before the DPP Central Standing Committee.” December 14, 2004. http://www.dpp.org.tw/news_content.php?menu_sn=7&sub_menu=43&sn=122.
 Office of President, Republic of China (Taiwan). Full Text of Chen’s Speech at Formosan Association for Public Affairs. March 4, 2007. http://www.president.gov.tw/php-bin/prez/shownews.php4?Rid=12655.
 Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council. “One-China Principle-Deng Xiaoping’s Six Conceptions for the Peaceful Reunification.” June 26, 1983. http://www.gwytb.gov.cn.
 “Taiwan Strait I: What’s Left of ‘One China’?” International Crisis Group Asia Report, No. 53, Beijing, Taipei, Washington, Brussels, 06 June 2003.
http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/reportarchive/A40099206062003.pdf.
 “Taiwan Strait II: The Risk of War.” International Crisis Group Asia Report, No. 54, Beijing, Taipei, Washington, Brussels, 06 June 2003.
http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/reportarchive/A40099106062003.pdf.
 “Taiwan Strait III: The Chance of Peace.” International Crisis Group Asia Report, No. 55, Beijing, Taipei, Washington, Brussels, 06 June 2003.
http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/reportarchive/A40099006062003.pdf.
 “Taiwan Strait IV: How An Ultimate Political Settlement Might Look.” International Crisis Group Asia Report, No. 75, Beijing, Taipei, Washington, Brussels, 06 June 2003.
http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/asia/taiwan_strait/075_taiwan_strait_iv_ultimate.pdf.
 UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI). “Restoration of the Lawful Rights of the People’s Republic of China in the United Nations”, 1967th Plenary Meeting, (25 October, 1971).
http://en.wikisource.org/.

Website Resources:
 http://www.taiwansecurity.org
 http://irtheoryandpractice.wm.edu
 http://www.ccsenet.org
 http://www.ait.org.tw/en
 http://www.mac.gov.tw/
 http://www.gio.gov.tw/
 http://www.irtheory.com/know.htm.
 http://www.etaiwannews.com
 http://www.fljs.org
 http://en.epochtimes.com/
 http://www.archive.org
 http://www.sef.org.tw/
 http://www.gwytb.gov.cn
 http://www.crisisgroup.org
 http://www.people.com.cn/
 http://book.kanunu.cn/
 http://en.wikisource.org/
 http://www.time.com/
 http://www.president.gov.tw/
 http://english.peopledaily.com.cn
 http://www.voanews.com/
 http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/
 http://www.wto.org/english/
 http://www.imf.org/
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/trad
 http://old.npf.org.tw/
 http://news.xinhuanet.com/
 http://www.gov.cn
 http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/
 http://www.chinapost.com.tw
 http://www.taipeitimes.com/
 http://www.cna.com.tw/
 http://www.dpp.org.tw/
 http://csis.org/program/
 http://newton.uor.edu/
 http://apdl.kcc.hawaii.edu/~taiwan/
 http://business.timesonline.co.uk/
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
外交學系
95253035
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095253035
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 袁易　zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor I , Yuanen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 狄雷克zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Uygül, Dileken_US
dc.creator (作者) 狄雷克zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Uygül, Dileken_US
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-May-2016 15:45:44 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-May-2016 15:45:44 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-May-2016 15:45:44 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0095253035en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95354-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 外交學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95253035zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究的目的在於分析國家認同(身分)，對於中國和臺灣之間所謂「國與國」關係的影響。兩岸關係的和暖始於１９７０及１９８０年代末期開始的「自由化」與「民主化」過程，這提供了雙方交流的機會，特別是在１９８７年中華民國政府開放經貿和民間交流，如一般民眾赴大陸探親。更重要的是，當臺灣的一黨專政消逝後，臺灣人民以民主改革重塑了政治環境，而這種民主改革也使臺灣政治產生了新的變化。

本研究認為，就「自由化」與「民主化」的過程而言，不僅是甚於政權的移轉，而且也包括某些政治之外的因素改變了意識形態，最明顯的因素即是經濟。自從１９７９年兩岸的軍事衝突結束後，雖然雙方並未建立有效且特久的和平機制，但在此時期，兩岸都經歷了一些社會自由化及著重經濟發展的政策變化。本文將透過三個焦點問題以理解「自由化」、「民主化」與兩岸之間的關係：

i.兩岸於１９７０年代後期及１９８０年代，在個別強人領導之下，國家認同（身分）的影響為何？
ii.這些發展在兩個中國實體的內部如何影響兩岸關係？
iii.未來兩岸如何調整政策以促進和暖的局勢？

本文將採用溫特的社會建構論做為研究的理論框架，亦即建構主義中的三個Ｉ：認同（身分）、利益和制度。以社會建構論應用在兩岸關係上是有其意義的，同時也顧及了國際關係理論做為一種積累式學科的特殊性。根據社會建構論指出，國家認同（身分）是透過文化規則以塑造，如１９８０年代臺灣人民對於民主的認知，及１９７０年代之後中國自由化的過程，都是其政治文化的一部分。因此，國家認同（身分）在以利益為驅動的國際關係下，必須以「國與國」的關係所取代。本文將以１９７０－８０年代兩岸關係做為案列，解釋國家認同（身分）在「國與國」的關係中的使用。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of the state identity in the state-to-state relations of mainland China and Taiwan. Following the ‘liberalization’ process on the mainland in the late 1970s and Taiwan’s ‘democratization’ of the 1980s, a thawing of relations between the PRC and the ROC was effected. The subsequent exchange between both sides of the Taiwan Strait has included such important changes as the ROC government’s lifting of travel and trade-related restrictions to mainland China in 1987. More importantly, when one-party rule was lifted the people of Taiwan were given the chance to shape the political landscape with the help of democratic reforms which gave a new substance to the political nature of the exchange.

The focal point of this study will be the argument that the ‘democratization’ and the ‘liberalization’ processes on both sides is not only because of the regime change but also the ideological shift caused by a number of extra-political factors, most notably economic factors. Although no effective mechanism for long-lasting peace has been established in Cross-Strait Relations since the end of the militarized disputes between the PRC and the ROC in 1979, this period also witnessed a shift in policy towards social liberalization along with an increased emphasis on economic development on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. I will approach the relationship between ‘democratization’ or ‘liberalization’ and Cross-Strait Relations through three focal questions:
i.How has it been the effect of state identity in the late 1970s and 1980s in China and in Taiwan under their respective leaderships?
ii.How did these developments within the two Chinese entities affect relations across the Taiwan Strait?
iii.How will both sides modify their policies in the future to create circumstances more conducive to reconciliation with the other side?

I intend to use Wendt`s Social Constructivist theory as the theoretical framework of the research on the basis of “3 I’s of Social Constructivism”, namely ‘Identity, Interest and Institution’. The application of Social Constructivism as an International Relations theory to Cross-Strait Relations aims to be relevant and persuasive considering the ad hoc –event driven– characteristic of International Relations as a discipline being accumulative. In Social Constructivism, state identities shape through the cultural norms, such as the Taiwanese perception of democracy as part of its own political culture in the early 1980s and the liberalization process of China from the late 1970s onwards. The state identity, therefore, makes room for the state-to-state relations under the International Relations driven by the national interest. The effect of the state identity in the state-to-state relations in the case study of Cross-Strait Relations, in the late 1970s and in the late 1980s respectively, will be comprehensively subjected to examination in my research.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents PLAGIARISM ……………………………………………………ii
ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………iii
中文摘要…………………………………………………………v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ……………………………………………vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ………………………………………………ix

CHAPTERS
1. INTRODUCTION ………………………………………1
2. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
2.1. Theoretical Development within the Study of International Relations…………5
2.2. The Theoretical Analysis of Cross-Strait Relations………………………………7
2.2.1. Realism………………………………………………8
2.2.2. Liberalism…………………………………………10
2.2.3. Social Constructivism…………………………12
2.3. Rhetoric about Rhetoric: Academic Formulations of Social Constructivism…………14
2.4. Social Constructivism’s Emergence into the Mainstream……………………….16
3. CHINA: THE ‘ONCE-SECRET NATION’ AND ITS PATH TO PARADOXICAL ECONOMIC PROSPERITY
3.1. The End of Maoism and the Legacy of Deng Xiaoping …19
3.2. An Unprecedented Confluence of Communism and Capitalism ………………22
3.3. Absolute Economic Prosperity with the ‘Cooperation’ of the Society: Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao ………24
4. TAIWAN: FROM ‘ONE-PARTY’ RULE TO ‘FRESH DEMOCRACY’ OF EAST ASIA
4.1. The Birth of “Taiwan”………………30
4.2. The New Mainland Threat……………………………33
4.3. Political Reform in the late 1970s: The End of Dynastic Rule………………… 34
4.3.1. “China” No More...………………………………36
4.4. A New Taiwan: The 1980s and onward……………………37
4.4.1. The Dangers of New Taiwanese “Nationalism”………………………………………………38
5. THE LINKAGE OF THE INTERACTION IN CROSS-STRAIT RELATIONS
5.1. Interpretation of the Relations………42
5.2. Liberalization vs. Democratization..……………44
5.3. Conflicting State Identities………………………………47
5.4. First Contact to Stalemate………………………………50
5.5. Resurgence of the KMT….…………………………………53
6. CONCLUSIONS ………………………………………58
BIBLIOGRAPHY …………………………65

APPENDIX
Taiwan Relations Act ………………………………77		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095253035en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中國zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 臺灣zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中華人民共和國zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中華民國zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 兩岸關係zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會建構主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自由化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 民主化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國家認同zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國家利益zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國家制度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Chinaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Taiwanen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) the PRCen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) the ROCen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cross-Strait Relationsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social Constructivismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Liberalizationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Democratizationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) National Identitiesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) National Interestsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Institutionsen_US
dc.title (題名) 國家認同與兩岸關係：經濟自由化vs.政治民主化zh_TW
dc.title (題名) NATIONAL IDENTITIES AND CROSS-STRAIT RELATIONS: ECONOMIC LIBERALIZATION vs. POLITICAL DEMOCRATIZATIONen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Books:
 Brown, Melissa J. 2004. Is Taiwan Chinese?: The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
 Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
 Bush, Richard C. 2006. Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
 Bush, Richard C., and Micheal O’Hanlon. 2007. A War Like No Other: The Truth About China’s Challenge to America. New York: Wiley.
 Carpenter, T. Galen. 2006. America’s Coming War with China: A Collision Course over Taiwan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
 Cole, Bernard D. 2006. Taiwan’s Security: History and Prospects. London: Routledge.
 Coogan, Tim Pat. 2002. Michael Collins: The Man Who Made Ireland. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
 Copper, John F. 2006. Playing with Fire: The Looming War with China over Taiwan. 21-36. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International General Interest.
 Fewsmith, Joseph. 2001. Elite Politics in Contemporary China. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.
 Gill, Bates. 2007. Rising Star: China’s New Security Diplomacy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
 Granatstein, J.L., and Robert Bothwell. 1991. Pirouette: Pierre Trudeau and Canadian Foreign Policy. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
 Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
 Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.
 Kuhn, Phillip A. 2008. Chinese Among Others: Emigration in Modern Times. Singapore: NUS Press.
 Onuf, Nicholas G. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Colombia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
 Roy, Denny. 2003. Taiwan: A Political History. New York: Cornell University Press.
 Segal, Ronald. 1975. Whose Jerusalem?: The Conflicts of Israel. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.
 Shirk, S. 2007. China: Fragile Superpower: How China’s Internal Politics Could Derail Its Peaceful Rise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 Taylor, Jay. 2000 The Generalissmo’s Son - Chiang Chingkuo and the Revolutions in China and Taiwan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
 Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
 Wang, James. C.F. 1980. Contemporary Chinese Politics: An Introduction. Hilo: University of Hawaii Press.
 Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Yatsen, Sun. 1920. International Development of China. Shanghai: The Commercial Press Ltd.
 Yiren, Rong. 1997. China in the Twenty-First Century: Politics, Economy and Society, edited by Fumio Itoh. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
 Zhang, Qiyun. 1959. An Outline History of Taiwan. Taipei: China Culture Publishing Foundation.

Chapters in an Edited Volume:
 Bush, Richard. 2005. “Lee Tenghui and ‘Separatism’.” in Dangerous Strait: the U.S.-Taiwan-China Crisis, edited by Nancy Bernkopf Tucker, 70-93. New York: Columbia University Press.
 Fierke, Karin M. 2007. “Constructivism.” in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, edited by Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Smith Smith, 166-185. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 Marsh, Robert. 2002. “National Identity and Ethnicity in Taiwan: Some Trends in the 1990s.” in Memories of the Future: National Identity Issues and the Search for a New Taiwan, edited by Stephan Corcuff, 144-59. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
 Shaw, Chonghai. 2001. “The Possibility of Cross-Strait Political Negotiation.” in Remarking the Chinese State: Strategies, Society, and Security, edited by Chen Min-Zhao and Brace J. Dickson, 257-278. London and New York: Routledge.
 Tucker, Nancy Bernkopf. 2005. “Dangerous Strait: Introduction.” in Dangerous Strait: the U.S.-Taiwan-China Crisis, edited by Nancy Bernkopf Tucker, 1-16. New York: Columbia University Press.
 Yu, Maochun. 2006. “Political and Military Factors Determining China’s Use of Force.” in If China Attacks Taiwan: Military Strategy, Politics and Economics, edited by Steve Y.S. Tsang, 17-35. New York: Routledge.

Articles in a Periodical and/or Online Journal:
 Adler, Emmanuel. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 3, No. 3 (1997): 319-363.
 Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore. “The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations.” International Organization, Vol. 53, No. 4 (Autumn 1999): 699-732.
 Cabestan, Jean-Pierre. “Taiwan’s Mainland Policy: Normalization, Yes; Reunification, Later.” The China Quarterly, No. 148, Special Issue: Contemporary Taiwan, (Dec., 1996): 1260-1283.
 Checkel, Jeffrey T. “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory.” World Politics, Vol. 50 (January 1998): 324-348.
 Chelu, Dana. “What is the Future for IR Theory? Does it need a Radical Review?” Journal of Politics and Law, Vol. 1 No. 2 (June 2008): 64-67.
http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jpl/article/viewFile/741/712.
 Chen, Qimao. “The Taiwan Issue and the Sino-US Relations: A PRC View.” Asian Survey, Vol. 27, No. 11 (November 1987): 1161-1175.
 “China and Taiwan: Uneasy Détente.” International Crisis Group, Asia Briefing, No. 42 (Seoul/Brussels, 21 Sept. 2005): 1-15.
http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/asia/taiwan_strait/b042_china_and_taiwan_uneasy_detente.pdf.
 Chiou, C.L. “Politics of Alienation and Polarization: Taiwan’s Tangwai in the 1980s.” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, Vol. 18, No. 3 (1986): 16-28.
 Dittmer, Lowell. “Taiwan and the Issue of National Identity.” Asian Survey, Vol. 44, No. 4 (Jul. - Aug., 2004): 475-483.
 Doyle, Michael W. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 12, No. 3 (Summer 1983): 205-235.
 Fewsmith, Joseph. “Rule of Law in China: Chinese Law and Business – The Political Economy of China’s Transition.” The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society in collaboration with The Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford (2007): 1-8.
http://www.fljs.org/uploads/documents/Fewsmith_pb2%231%23.pdf.
 Friedberg, Aaron L., “The Future of US – China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?” International Security, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Fall 2005): 7-45.
 Godley, Michael R., “Socialism with Chinese Characters: Sun Yatsen and the International Development of China.” The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, No. 18 (July 1987):109-125.
 Harding, Harry. “The Concept of ‘Greater China’: Themes, Variations and Reservations.” The China Quarterly, No. 136 (Special Issue: Greater China) (Dec. 1993): 660-686.
 Harvard Group (Abdelal Rawi, Yoshiko M. Herrera, Alastair Iain Johnston, and Rose McDermott). “Identity as a Variable.” Perspectives on Politics, No. 4 (Dec. 2006): 695-711.
 Hu, Zuliu and Mohsin S. Khan. “Why Is China Growing So Fast?.” IMF Economic Issues, No. 8 (April, 1997): 1-10.
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/issues8/issue8.pdf.
 Kang, Xiaoguang. “China: Political Development and Political Stability in the Era of Reform.” The Chinese Economy, Vol. 35, No. 5 (2003): 6-92.
 Keohane, Robert O. and Lisa L. Martin, “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Summer 1995): 39-51.
 Li, Hongtu. “China’s Modernization: A Historical Survey.” Shanghai: East Chinese Normal University, (April 2007): 145-156.
http://w1.ens-lsh.fr/colloques/chine2004/china_modernization.pdf.
 Mearsheimer, John J. “A Realist Reply.” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Summer 1995): 82-93.
 McClaran, John P., “US Arm Sales to Taiwan: Implications for the Future of Sino-US Relationship.” Asian Survey, Vol. 40, No. 4, (July – Aug. 2000): 622-640.
 Nathan, Andrew J., “China’s Goals in the Taiwan Strait.” The China Journal, No. 36, (July 1996): 87-93.
 Nye, Joseph S., “The Rise of China’s Soft Power.” The Wall Street Journal Asia, Belfast Center for Science and International Affairs, International Security Program, (29 Dec. 2005): 1.
http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/1499/riseofchinassoftpower.html.
 Rice, Edward E. “The Sino-US Détente: How Durable?” Asian Survey, Vol. 13, No. 9, (Sept. 1973):805-811.
 Ruggie, John. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.” International Organization, No. 52 (Autumn 1998): 855-885.
 State Council of the PRC, “The Taiwan Question and Reunification of China.” Beijing Review Vol. 36, No. 6 (September 6-12, 1993): i-viii.
 Walt, Stephen M. “International Relations: One World, Many Theories.” Foreign Policy, No. 110, Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge, (Spring 1998): 29-46.
 Wang, T. Y. “Taiwan’s Foreign Relations under Lee Tenghui’s Rule: 1988-2000.” American Asian Review Vol. 20, No. 1 (Spring 2002): 71-106.
 Wang, T. Y. and I-Chou Liu. “Contending Identities in Taiwan Implications for Cross-Strait Relations.” Asian Survey, Vol. 44, No. 4 (Jul. - Aug., 2004): 568-590.
 Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy is what States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2, (July 1992): 391-425.
 Wendt, Alexander. “Collective Identity Formation and the International State.” American Political Science Review, Vol. 88, No. 2, (June 1994): 384-396.
 Wendt, Alexander. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1, (Summer 1995): 71-81.
 Wu, Yushan. “Taiwan’s Domestic Politics and Cross-Strait Relations.” The China Journal, No. 53, Celebrating the Universities Service Centre for China Studies, Contemporary China Center, Australian National University, (Jan., 2005): 35-60.
 Wu, Yushan, “Theorizing on Relations across the Taiwan Strait: Nine Contending Approaches.” Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 9, No. 25, (2000): 407-428.
 Zhao, John Quansheng. “An Analysis of Unification: The PRC Perspective.” Asian Survey, Vol. 23, No. 10, (Oct. 1983): 1095-1114.

Newspaper Reports:
 “Chinese, U.S. presidents hold telephone talks on Taiwan, Tibet.” Xinhua Net, March 27, 2008.
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-03/27/content_7865209.htm.
 Gollust, David. “US says Taiwanese President’s Independence Remarks ‘Unhelpful’.” Voice of America News, March 5, 2007.
http://www.voanews.com.
 Lev, Samantha. “Chinese Lawyers’ Motion Defends Falun Gong in Court for First Time.” Epoch Times, October 25, 2007.
http://en.epochtimes.com/news/7-10-25/61180.html.
 “Presidential Office defends Ma.” Taipei Times, September 05, 2008. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2008/09/05/2003422339.
 “Taiwan opens up to mainland Chinese investors.” The Times, May 04, 2009. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/article6199775.ece.
 “Taiwan and China in ‘special relations’: Ma.” China Post, September 04, 2008. http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/china-taiwan%20relations/2008/09/04/173082/Taiwan-and.htm.
 Ting, Hoon. “Taiwan Must Cut out the Middleman.” Taipei Times, Friday, Jun 05, 2009.
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2009/06/05/2003445390.

Chinese-language Source:
 Wang, Yubin and Suhong Wang (王玉彬與王苏红). 1947. Battles over the Central Plains (Dashi Zhongyuan, 大势中原). Reportages on Revolutionary Struggle in China (Zhongguo geming douzheng baogao wenxue congshu, 中国革命斗争报告文学丛书). Dabie Mountain Series (Qianli yuejin dabie shanjuan, 千里跃进大别山卷). Beijing: PLA Publishing House (Beijing: Jiefangjun chubanshe, 北京：解放军出版社).
 Yang, Renjing. 1990. Hai Ming Wei zai Zhongguo (海明威在中國, Ernest Hemingway in China). Xiamen: Xiamen University Press.
 Zhonggong Shenzhen Shiwei Xuanchuanbu (中共深圳市委宣傳部). 1992. Deng Xiaoping yu Shenzhen (鄧小平與深圳, Deng Xiaoping and Shenzhen). Shenzhen: Haitian Chubanshe (深圳: 海天出版社).
 “Haixia Liangan Baoji huitan jiyao” (海峡两岸包机会谈纪要, Cross-Strait charter flights negotiation memorandum). Xinhua News Agency, June 13, 2008. http://news.xinhuanet.com/tw/2008-06/13/content_8360544.htm.
 “Hu Jintao hui jian Xiao Wanchang jiu Liangan jingji jiaoliu hezuo jiaohuan yijian” (胡锦涛会见萧万长 就两岸经济交流合作交换意见, Hu Jintao meets Vincent Siew; Exchange opinions on Cross-Strait economic exchange and co-operation). Xinhua News Agency, April 12, 2008.
http://www.gov.cn/ldhd/2008-04/12/content_943267.htm.
 “Ma Zongtong: Liangan guanxi shi xianshi guanxi” (馬總統：兩岸關係是現實關係, President Ma: Cross-Strait Relations are Relations Based on Current Reality). Central News Agency of the Republic of China, October 08, 2008. http://www.cna.com.tw/CNA/TodayTopicNews/TodayTopicNews.aspx?NewsID=200810070260.
 Mainland Affairs Council of the ROC. “Minzhong dui di er ci ‘Jiang-Chen huitan’ jiegou zhi kanfa” (民眾對第二次「江陳會談」結果之看法, Public view on the results of the second Chiang-Chen talks). http://www.mac.gov.tw/big5/mlpolicy/pos/9711/971109b.pdf.
 Mainland Affairs Council of the ROC. “Duideng, heping yu shuangying ─ Zhong Hua Min Guo dui Tezhu guo yu guo guanxi’ de lichang” (‘對等、和平 與雙贏 ─ 中華民國對「特殊國與國關係」的立場, Equality, peace and win-win ─ Republic of China’s position on “Special State-to-State Relations”). http://www.mac.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=49756&ctNode=5842&mp=4.
 Straits Exchange Foundation. “Hai jijin hui de chengli yu yange” (海基會的成立與沿革, The establishment of the SEF and its evolution). http://www.sef.org.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1548&CtNode=3798&mp=19.
 Su, Chi (蘇起). “‘Yi ge Zhongguo, ge ze biao shu’ gong shi de shishi” xu: “‘Yi ge Zhongguo, ge ze biaoshu’ gongshi de yiyi yu gongxian” (「『一個中國，各自表述』共識的史實」序： 「一個中國，各自表述」共識的意義與貢獻, The Abstract on “Realities of the ‘One China, Respective Interpretations’ Consensus”: The meaning and the contribution of the ‘One China, Respective Interpretations’ Consensus). Guo Zheng Fen Xi (國政分析, National Policy Foundation) No. 090-023 (November 4, 2002).
http://old.npf.org.tw/.
 Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council. “Haixia liangan guanxi xiehui zhangcheng” (海峽兩岸關係協會章程, ARATS Charter). http://www.gwytb.gov.cn:82/hx/hxzc.htm.
 “Taiwan gong chang dang shenqing 14 nian hou huozhun chengli” (臺灣共產黨申請14年後獲准成立, Communist Party of Taiwan allowed to set up after 14 years since its application). BBC Zhongwen Wang (英國廣播公司中文網, BBC Chinese website) July 21, 2008. http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/trad/hi/newsid_7510000/newsid_7518500/7518502.
 “Tigao renshi kanqing weihai bawo zhengce weihu wending” (提高认识 看清危害 把握政策 维护稳定, Enhance Knowledge; See Clearly the Harm; Hold on to Policies; Maintain Stability). People’s Daily, July 23, 1999.
 “Wu Nuobeier dezhu Ma zai pao Liangan hu bu fouren” (晤諾貝爾得主 馬再拋兩岸互不否認, Meeting Nobel laureates, Ma again speaks of mutual non-denial). Liberty Times, April 19, 2008. http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2008/new/apr/19/today-p3.htm.

Popular magazines:
 Dusen, Henry P. Van “China’s Crisis: The Future Peace of the U.S. and the World Depends upon the Outcome of an ‘Irreconcilable Conflict’,” Life Magazine, September 2, 1946, 36-37.
 Ramzy, Austin. “Who Shot Chen Shuibian?.” Time, March 14, 2005. http://www.time.com.
 Snyder, Jack. “One World, Rival Theories.” Foreign Policy, Nov/Dec 2004, 52-62.
http://www/foreignpolicy.com


Conference Papers:
 Acharya, Amitav. “International Relations Theory and Cross-Strait Relations.” Paper presented at The International Forum on Peace and Security in the Taiwan Strait. Taipei, Taiwan, July 26-28, 1999.
http://www.taiwansecurity.org/IS/Acharya-International-Relations-Theory-and-Cross-Strait-Relations.htm.
 Maliniak, Daniel, Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson, and Michael J. Tierney. “The International Relations Discipline, 1980-2006.” Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois, August/ September 2007.
http://irtheoryandpractice.wm.edu/projects/trip/TRIP.pdf.

Theses:
 Ergenç, Ceren. “Chinese Nation-Building and Sun Yatsen: A Study on 1911 Revolution in China.” M.S. Thesis in International Relations submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University. Ankara, Turkey, August 2005.

Online Resources:
 Democratic Progressive Party. “Chairman Chen Shuibian’s Resignation Speech before the DPP Central Standing Committee.” December 14, 2004. http://www.dpp.org.tw/news_content.php?menu_sn=7&sub_menu=43&sn=122.
 Office of President, Republic of China (Taiwan). Full Text of Chen’s Speech at Formosan Association for Public Affairs. March 4, 2007. http://www.president.gov.tw/php-bin/prez/shownews.php4?Rid=12655.
 Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council. “One-China Principle-Deng Xiaoping’s Six Conceptions for the Peaceful Reunification.” June 26, 1983. http://www.gwytb.gov.cn.
 “Taiwan Strait I: What’s Left of ‘One China’?” International Crisis Group Asia Report, No. 53, Beijing, Taipei, Washington, Brussels, 06 June 2003.
http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/reportarchive/A40099206062003.pdf.
 “Taiwan Strait II: The Risk of War.” International Crisis Group Asia Report, No. 54, Beijing, Taipei, Washington, Brussels, 06 June 2003.
http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/reportarchive/A40099106062003.pdf.
 “Taiwan Strait III: The Chance of Peace.” International Crisis Group Asia Report, No. 55, Beijing, Taipei, Washington, Brussels, 06 June 2003.
http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/reportarchive/A40099006062003.pdf.
 “Taiwan Strait IV: How An Ultimate Political Settlement Might Look.” International Crisis Group Asia Report, No. 75, Beijing, Taipei, Washington, Brussels, 06 June 2003.
http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/asia/taiwan_strait/075_taiwan_strait_iv_ultimate.pdf.
 UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI). “Restoration of the Lawful Rights of the People’s Republic of China in the United Nations”, 1967th Plenary Meeting, (25 October, 1971).
http://en.wikisource.org/.

Website Resources:
 http://www.taiwansecurity.org
 http://irtheoryandpractice.wm.edu
 http://www.ccsenet.org
 http://www.ait.org.tw/en
 http://www.mac.gov.tw/
 http://www.gio.gov.tw/
 http://www.irtheory.com/know.htm.
 http://www.etaiwannews.com
 http://www.fljs.org
 http://en.epochtimes.com/
 http://www.archive.org
 http://www.sef.org.tw/
 http://www.gwytb.gov.cn
 http://www.crisisgroup.org
 http://www.people.com.cn/
 http://book.kanunu.cn/
 http://en.wikisource.org/
 http://www.time.com/
 http://www.president.gov.tw/
 http://english.peopledaily.com.cn
 http://www.voanews.com/
 http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/
 http://www.wto.org/english/
 http://www.imf.org/
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/trad
 http://old.npf.org.tw/
 http://news.xinhuanet.com/
 http://www.gov.cn
 http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/
 http://www.chinapost.com.tw
 http://www.taipeitimes.com/
 http://www.cna.com.tw/
 http://www.dpp.org.tw/
 http://csis.org/program/
 http://newton.uor.edu/
 http://apdl.kcc.hawaii.edu/~taiwan/
 http://business.timesonline.co.uk/		zh_TW