1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 創業競賽團隊與競賽機制對學習成效之研究
作者 戴龍睿
貢獻者 溫肇東
戴龍睿
關鍵詞 創業競賽
學習成效
學習機制
團隊運作
entrepreneurial competition
learning effect
learning mechanisms
teamwork
日期 2002
上傳時間 9-May-2016 16:22:28 (UTC+8)
摘要 　　目前世界各地風起雲湧的創業競賽，不論是大學或民間單位主辦，都有規模逐漸變大，參加隊伍數量增多等趨勢。參賽的隊伍由某區域性大學擴展到該國所有大學，進而全球化。這一波大學生參加創業競賽的風潮，也帶動各知名大學逐漸重視創業研究，在創業課程的數量、種類、重要性也日趨增加。
     　　在各國創業競賽風行之時，國內兩大創業競賽也已悄悄地邁入第四屆的比賽了，也算是漸入成熟的階段。本研究嘗試以參賽者主觀評鑑的角度來探討其對於參加創業競賽的學習效果。
     　　因此不同的創業競賽模式、團隊背景、參賽動機甚至於團隊運作情形對於知識學習與能力提升的學習成效否有不同的影響？若是不同，又有哪些差異？這便是本研究欲探討的問題。
     　　本研究採用結構式問卷輔以個案訪談來收集資料，主要研究對象為第三屆TIC100科技創新競賽與第三屆台灣工業銀行創業大賽之團隊成員。
     　　經分析資料，研究發現如下：
     　　1. 透過創業競賽的學習，確實可以學習到創業的知識與能力。
     　　2. 透過創業課程的要求與輔助參加創業競賽，對於創業知識與能力的學習成效最佳。
     　　3. 不同的創業競賽模式其對於知識學習、能力提升與整體學習成效無明顯差異。
     　　4. 學習型導向創業競賽整體學習成效較實務型導向創業競賽佳。
     　　5. 競賽參與動機對於知識學習、能力提升與整體學習成效有明顯正相關。
     　　6. 不同的團隊背景其對於知識學習、能力提升與整體學習成效無明顯差異。
     　　7. 團隊運作情形對於知識學習、能力提升與整體學習成效有明顯正相關。
　　There are more and more entrepreneurial competitions held by universities or big famous companies years by years. The number of teams participating games grows rapidly and the region of some contest expands from within a college activity to a global one. With this popular activities, it also makes all famous universities and colleges pay much attention to entrepreneurial research and the quantity and variety of entrepreneurial courses have become increasingly important.
     　　With foreign entrepreneurial competitions’ popular, the tow entrepreneurial competitions in Taiwan are also get into 4th . This study try to focus on entrepreneurial competitions’ learning effect.
     　　Therefore, if there any different learning effect on entrepreneurial knowledge and skill between different competition model, team background, motivation, even if teamwork situation?
     　　This study has adopted structural questionnaire and case study to collect data and information. The major study targets are the members of 3rd TIC100 Technology Innovation Competition and 3rd Industrial Bank of Taiwan Cross-Century Entrepreneur Competition.
     　　After doing interview and analysis, it gets several conclusions in this investigation:
     　　1. It indeed can learn about entrepreneurial knowledge and skill through entrepreneurial competition.
     　　2. The learning effect on entrepreneurial knowledge and skill will be better by taking entrepreneurial course and participating in entrepreneurial competition.
     　　3. There are not noticeable different on learning effect between different entrepreneurial competition model.
     　　4. Learning-orientated entrepreneurial competition’s learning effect is better then practical-orientated entrepreneurial competition.
     　　5. There are noticeable correlation between participating motivation and learning effect.
     　　6. There are not noticeable different on learning effect between different team background.
     　　7. There are noticeable correlation between teamwork situation and learning effect.
謝辭
     摘要
     Abstract
     目錄
     表目錄
     圖目次
     第一章 緒論-----1
     　　第一節 研究動機與背景-----1
     　　第二節 研究目的與問題-----2
     　　第三節 論文架構-----3
     第二章 文獻探討-----4
     　　第一節 創業的知識與能力-----4
     　　第二節 學習理論-----14
     　　第三節 團隊運作-----18
     　　第四節 創業競賽-----31
     第三章 研究方法-----41
     　　第一節 研究架構-----41
     　　第二節 研究變數說明-----43
     　　第三節 研究對象與資料蒐集-----45
     　　第四節 問卷設計-----46
     　　第五節 資料分析方法-----48
     　　第六節 信度與效度-----49
     第四章 資料分析與討論-----50
     　　第一節 樣本描述-----50
     　　第二節 競賽學習機制與學習成效之關係-----57
     　　第三節 團隊與其學習成效之關係-----60
     　　第四節 競賽學習機制探討-----69
     　　第五節 競賽獲獎效應-----75
     第五章 結論與建議-----78
     　　第一節 研究發現-----78
     　　第二節 研究建議-----81
     　　第三節 後續研究建議-----82
     　　第四節 研究限制-----83
     參考文獻----- 84
     　　中文部分-----84
     　　英文部分-----86
     附錄
     　　附錄一 第三屆TIC100科技創新競賽問卷
     　　附錄二 第三屆台灣工業銀行創業大賽問卷
     　　附錄三 第三屆TIC100科技創新競賽創業構想規劃書
     　　附錄四 第三屆台灣工業銀行創業大賽創業計畫書參考格式
     
     表目錄
     表2-1-1 科技管理(MOT)所需的技能-----7
     表2-1-2 創業家能力及管理者能力文獻整理表-----11
     表2-1-3 創業計畫書所涵蓋之知識領域-----12
     表2-2-1 學習機制相關學理整理-----17
     表2-3-1 團隊特質與運作-----21
     表2-3-2 團隊組成因素對團隊績效的影響結果摘要表-----23
     表2-3-3 團隊結構因素對團隊績效影響結果摘要表-----25
     表2-3-4 團隊運作因素對團隊績效影響結果摘要表-----26
     表2-3-5 高效能團隊的特質-----28
     表2-4-1 國內兩大創業競賽學習機制比較-----40
     表3-4-1 本研究知識的學習量表問卷題號-----46
     表3-6-1 本研究研究變項信度分析-----49
     表4-1-1 問卷回收分析表-----50
     表4-1-2 樣本分析表-----50
     表4-1-3 參賽成員背景統計-----51
     表4-2-1 競賽學習機制與學習成效分析表-----57
     表4-2-2 知識學習與能力提升之相關度-----58
     表4-2-3 競賽學習機制與學習成效分析表-----58
     表4-3-1 團隊運作與學習成效之相關度-----60
     表4-3-2 參與動機與知識學習成效分析-----63
     表4-3-3 參與動機與能力提升成效分析-----64
     表4-3-4 參與動機與總學習成效分析-----65
     表4-3-5 團隊屬性與學習成效分析表-----66
     表4-3-6 團隊屬性與學習成效分析表-----66
     表4-3-7 競賽參與動機分類表-----67
     
     圖目錄
     圖2-1-1 Timmons（1999）創業精神的觀念性架構-----9
     圖2-2-1 組織的動態學習系統-----16
     圖3-1-1 本研究架構圖-----42
     圖4-1-1 參賽團隊屬性分佈圖-----52
     圖4-1-2 參賽者性別分佈圖-----53
     圖4-1-3 參賽者身份分佈圖-----54
     圖4-1-4 參賽者年齡分佈圖-----55
     圖4-1-5 參賽者學歷分佈圖-----56
     圖4-3-1 參與動機分析圖-----62
參考文獻 中文部分
     1.方世杰、鄭仲興(民90.12)，「組織間學習機制與合作研發之組織學習績效的實證研究─組織間互動之觀點」，管理學報18卷4期
     2.台灣工業銀行(民90)，「第三屆創業大賽專刊」，www.wewin.com.tw
     3. 李佩芬 (民89.1)，「競標下世紀楊致遠-大學創業競賽，為何風起雲湧？」，數位時代第七期
     4. 李弘暉(民86)，〈團隊原理〉，中國行政評論，第6卷，第2期，頁73- 86
     5. 李文豪(1993)，新產品快速研發之組織配合
     6. 司徒達賢(民90)，「從企業管理知識內涵與結構談企業知識之傳習方法」
     7. 吳定(民85)，《組織發展理論與技術》，台北：順達出版社。
     8. 呂國禎(民91.4)，「大學生創業風潮來了！」，新新聞790期
     9. 吳韻儀 (民90.5)，2001全美MBA排行榜(P.174)，天下CHEERS雜誌8期
     10.劭瑞珍譯，Bower and Hilgard 原著，1990，學習理論：學習活動的規律探索，五南：台北
     11.孫本初 (民86年)，《公共管理》，台北：時英出版社
     12.研華文教基金會(民90)，「TIC100科技創新執行計畫」，www.tic100.org.tw
     13.徐銘宏(民87)，「創造力環境特質與學習型策略關係之質化比較研究-實質選擇權觀點及其應用」，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
     14.涂藝鐘(民86)，「經營洞視與團隊練達性對組織創導團隊績效的影響」，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文
     15.黃炳滄(民81)，「創業行為﹑個人特質﹑人際網絡及社會傾向間之關聯性研究以管理顧問業為例」，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
     16.黃嘉嘉(民88)，「團隊建立之研究：一個組織的觀點」，私立中國文化大學政治學研究所碩士論文
     17.莊士杰(民86)，「團隊學習之深度匯談實證研究」，國立雲林技術學院企業管理技術研究所碩士論文
     18.高志宏(1993)，管理行為與專案特徵對專案績效的權變影響研究：以某民營研究機構之科技專案為例
     19.張東峰、謝進興編譯，Hilgard等原著，1984，心理學，台北：桂冠
     20.張春興及楊國樞，1993，心理學，台北：三民
     21.溫肇東(民88)，「從MIT50K到TIC100─成功的科技創業催生者」
     22.溫肇東(民90)，「創業精神的學習平台─創業競賽與創業課程」
     23.楊曙維(民90)，「知識型團隊特性與知識管理策略關係之研究」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文
     24.蔡明宏，「以創造力為基礎的競爭策略-意會過程部分」
     25.劉萍、李盈穎 (民90.11)，「少年董事長-傳奇五味雜成」，數位週刊64期
     26.廖世德譯，Ferguson原著，1993，寶瓶同謀，台北：方智
     27.鄭俐敏(民89)，「團隊知識轉換與知識創造的實驗研究：知識螺旋理論的驗證」，私立東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
     28.鄭仲興(民89)，「組織間學習機制的建立與學習績效之研究以廠商參與工研院科技專案為例」，國立義守大學管理研究所碩士論文
     英文部分
     1.Allen, T.J.(1971).”Communications, technology transfer, and the role of technical gatekeeper”,R&D Management, 1,pp.14-21.
     2.Allen, T.J.(1977).”Managing the flow of technology”, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
     3.Ancona,D.G. and Caldwell,D.F.(1990).”Beyond boundary spanning:Managing external dependence inproduct development teams”, Journal of high Technology Management Research, 1,pp.119-135
     4.Ancona,D.G. and Caldwell,D.F.(1992a).”Demography and design:Predictors of new product team performance”, Organizational Science,3(3),pp.321-341
     5.Ancona,D.G. and Caldwell,D.F.(1992b).”Bridging the boundary:External process and performance in oraganizational teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly,37,pp.634-665
     6.Aulakh,P.S.;Kotabe,M.&Sahay,A.(1996),”Trust and performance in cross-border marketing partnerships:A behavioral approach”,Journal of International Business Studies,27(5),pp.1005-1032
     7.Argyris,Chris 1990 “Overcoming Organizational Defenses：Facilitating Organizational Learning Needham, MA：Allen and Bacon”
     8.Bennis, W. (1989) On Becoming a Leader
     9.Benjamin,B.(1993).”Understanding the political dynamic of developing new products”, Working paper,Stanford university Graduate school of Business Standford, CA.
     10.Brown, S.L.Eisenhardt, K.M.(1995).”Product development:Past research, Present findings,and future directions”, Academy of Management Review, 20(2),pp343-378.
     11.Carayannis ,E. G ,Alexander ,J, & Ioannidis ,A.(2000),”Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government-university-industry(GUI)R&D partnerships in the US, Germany and France”,Technovation,20(9),pp.477-488
     12.Cooke,R.A. and J.L.Szumal(1994).”The Impact of group Interaction Style on Problem Solving Effectiveness”, Journal of Applied Beheavioral Science,30(4),December,pp.415-437
     13.Clark,K.B. and Fujimoto, T.(1991).Product development performance, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
     14.Cooper, R.G.(1987).”What Makes a New Product a Winner:Success Factors at the Project Level”, R&D Management, 17(3),pp.175-189.
     15.Dodgson, M.(1993),”Learning, trust, and technological collaboration”, Human Relations,46:1, pp.77-95.
     16.Dussauge ,P. ,Garrette ,B.& Mitchell ,W.(2000)”Learning form competing partners: Outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia”, Strategic Management Journal,21 ,pp.99-126.
     17.Dyer ,J.H. & Singh ,H.(1998),”The relational view:Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage” ,Academy of Management Review, 23:4 ,pp.660-679.
     18.Dougherty,D.(1990).”Understanding new markets for new products”, Strategic Management Journal,11,pp.59-78
     19.Dougherty,D.(1992).”A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation”, Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue,13,pp77-92
     20.Elisabeth J. Teal, Baylor University; Charles W Hofer,The University of Georgia “The determinants of new venture success strategy,industry structure,and founding entrepreneurial team”
     21.French, W. L., W. L. & Bell, C. H. Jr 1995　　Organization Development : Behavioral science Interventions for Organization Improvement. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice-Hall, Inc.
     22.Francis, Dave & Young, Don 1992　　Improving Work Groups : a Practical Manual for Team Building. San Francisco, CA : Pfeiffer & Company.
     23.Gladstein, D.L.(1984).”Group in Context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness”,Administrative Science Quality,29, pp.499-517.
     24.Gold, B.(1987).”Approaches to accelerating product and process development”,Journal of Product Innovation Management,4(2),June,pp.81-88.
     25.Grant,R. M.(1996),”Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal,17 ,Winter Special Issue ,pp.109-122.
     26.Guzzo, R. A., Salas, E., & Associates 1995 Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass Publishers.
     27.Gulati, R.(1999),”Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation”, Strategic Management Journal,20 ,pp.397-420.
     28.Gupta,A.K. and Wilemon, D.L.(1990).”Accelerating the development of technology-based new Product”,California Management Review,32(2),Winter,pp.24-44
     29.Gupta ,A. K. & Govindarajan ,V.(2000),”Knowledge flows within multinational coroprations”, Strategic Management Journal,21 ,pp.473-496
     30.Hamel ,G.(1991),”Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international stragegic alliances”, Strategic Management Journal, 12,pp.83-103
     31.HR Management(1995).Nov,P.48.
     32.Inkpen, A. C.(1998).``Learning and Knowledge Acquisition Through International Strategic Alliances``,Academy of Management Executive,12:4,pp.69-80.
     33.Jari Handelberg, Helsinki School of Economics and BA; Shailendra Vyakarnam, Nottingham Business School“Eentrepreneurial top management team demography, process and organizational growth: differential effects by strategic orientation and perceived competitive conditions”
     34.Johson, David.W.,Johnson,R.T. and Smith,K.(1989)”Controversy without Decision Making Stituations”,in M.Afzalur Rahim, Managing Conflict:An
     35.Joyce, W.F.(1986).”Matrix organizations:A social experiment”,Academy of Management Journal, 3,pp536-561.
     36.Kerzner, Harold.(1982),”Conflicts:The Conflict Environment”in Project Management for Executives, Kerzner, H.eds.New York :Van Noatrand Reinhold Company,pp556-560.
     37.Kirzner, I.(1973), Competition and entrepreneurship, Chicago:the university of Chicago press,p.23
     38.Katzenbach, Jon R. & Smith, Douglas K. 1993　　 “The Discipline of Teams” Harvard Business Review, Mar.-Apr. pp.111- 120.
     39.Katz, R.(1982).”The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance” Administrative Science Quarterly, 27,pp81-104.
     40.Keller, R.T.(1986).”Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, 29,pp715-726.
     41.Kogut B. & Zander, U.(1992),”Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology”, Organization Science,3:3,August, pp.383-396.
     42.Leonard-Barton, D.(1995). Wellsprings of Lnowkdge: Building and Sustainirg the Sources of Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
     43.Lane P. J. & Lubatkin ,M.(1998)”Relative absorptive capacity and interogranizational learning” , Strategic Management Journal, 19 ,pp461-477
     44.Leavitt, H.J.and J. Lipman-Blumen(1995).”Hot Group”, Havard Business Review, July-August,pp.109-116.
     45.Lorenzoni, G. and A. Lipparini(1999).``The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study``, Strategic Management Journal, 20, pp.317-338.
     46.Mabert, V.A.;Muth,J.F. and Schmenner,R.W.(1992).”Collapsing new product development times:six case studies”,Journal of Product Innovation Management ,9(3),September,pp.200-212.
     47.McGrath. R. G.;Venkataraman, S.;MacMillan ,I.C.(1995),”Defining and developing competence:A strategic process paradigm”, Strategic Management Journal,16,pp.251-275.
     48.McGrath. R. G.;Venkataraman, S.;TSAI ,M.H. and MacMillan,I.(1996),”Innovation, Competitive Adventage and Rent:A Model and Test”,Forthcoming,March, Management Science, 42(3),March,pp.389-403
     49.Millson,M.R.;Raj,S.P. and Wilemon.D.(1992)”A survey of major approaches for acceleration new product development”,J Journal of Product Innovation Management 9(1),March,pp.53-69.
     50.Mitsuko Hirata, Tokai University “Start-up teams and organizational growth in japan venture firms”
     51.Manz, C. C. & Sims, H. P.Jr. 1990　　 Super Leading : Leading Other to Lead Themselves. New York: Berkeley Books.
     52.Mallick, Debasish N.; Chaudhury, Abhijit “Technology management education in MBA programs: a comparative study of knowledge and skill requirements” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management Volume: 17, Issue: 2, June, 2000, pp. 153-173
     53.Montebello, Anthony R. & Buzzotta Victor R 1993　　 “Work Teams That Work” Training & Development Journal, 47(3), pp59-64
     54.McGohee,W. and Tayler, J.w.,1961,Training In Business and Industry,New York:John Wiley and Sons.
     55.Nonaka ,I.(1994),”A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”, Organization Science, 5(1),pp.14-37
     56.Pisano, G.P.(1994).”Knowledge, Integration, and the Locus of Learning:An Empirical Analysis of Process development”, Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp.85-100.
     57.Polanyi, M.(1962).Personal knowledge : Towards a postcritical philosophy. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
     58.Powell, W. W., K. W. Kouput and L. Smith-Doerr(1996).``interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology``, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, pp.116-145.
     59.Popper M. & Lipshitz ,R.(1998), “Organizational learning mechanisms a structural and cultural approach to oragizational learning”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Socience,34(2) ,pp.161-179.
     60.Quick , Thomas L. 1992　　 Successful Team Building. New York : American Management　 Association . pp.16-17.
     61.Raia, E.(1991).”Taking time out of product design”,Purchasing, 110(6)April 4,pp.36-39.
     62.Ray, D. & Bronstein H. 1995　　 Teaming Up : Making the Transition to a Self — Directed, Team —Based Organization. New York : McGraw — Hill, Inc. Robbins, Stephen P
     63.Rosenau, Milton D.,Jr.(1988).”Faster new product development”, Journal of Product Development.
     64.Robbins,S.P.,1978,Personel：The Management of Human Resource ,New York：Prentice-Hall
     65.Steensma, H. H.(1996),”Acquiring technological competencies through inter-organization collaboration : An organizational learning perspective”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,12(4),pp.267-286.
     66.Shnok, J. H. 1982 Working in Teams：A Practicsl Manual for Improving Work Groups. New York：AMACOM Press.
     67.Timmons J. A. (1999)，New Venture Creation, Irwin McGraw-Hill 1999 ,p37-40
     68.Uttal, B.(1987).”Speeding new ideas to market”, Fortune, 115(5), March 2,pp.62-66.
     69.Van Aken,J.E. & Weggeman ,H.P.(2000), “Managing learning in informal innovation networks: Overcomming the Daphne-dilemma”, R&D Management, 30(2) ,pp.139-149.
     70.Vesey, Joseph T.(1991).”The new competetitors think in term of speed to market”SAM Advanced Management Journal, 56(4), autumn pp.26-33.
     71.Wolff,M.F.(1992)”Working Faster”,Research Technology Management November/December,35(6),pp.10-12.
     72.Ziger, B.J. and Maidique, M.(1990).”A model of new product development:An empirical test”, Management Science, 36,pp.867-883.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理研究所
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2010000154
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 溫肇東zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 戴龍睿zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 戴龍睿zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-May-2016 16:22:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-May-2016 16:22:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-May-2016 16:22:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) A2010000154en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95468-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 科技管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 　　目前世界各地風起雲湧的創業競賽，不論是大學或民間單位主辦，都有規模逐漸變大，參加隊伍數量增多等趨勢。參賽的隊伍由某區域性大學擴展到該國所有大學，進而全球化。這一波大學生參加創業競賽的風潮，也帶動各知名大學逐漸重視創業研究，在創業課程的數量、種類、重要性也日趨增加。
     　　在各國創業競賽風行之時，國內兩大創業競賽也已悄悄地邁入第四屆的比賽了，也算是漸入成熟的階段。本研究嘗試以參賽者主觀評鑑的角度來探討其對於參加創業競賽的學習效果。
     　　因此不同的創業競賽模式、團隊背景、參賽動機甚至於團隊運作情形對於知識學習與能力提升的學習成效否有不同的影響？若是不同，又有哪些差異？這便是本研究欲探討的問題。
     　　本研究採用結構式問卷輔以個案訪談來收集資料，主要研究對象為第三屆TIC100科技創新競賽與第三屆台灣工業銀行創業大賽之團隊成員。
     　　經分析資料，研究發現如下：
     　　1. 透過創業競賽的學習，確實可以學習到創業的知識與能力。
     　　2. 透過創業課程的要求與輔助參加創業競賽，對於創業知識與能力的學習成效最佳。
     　　3. 不同的創業競賽模式其對於知識學習、能力提升與整體學習成效無明顯差異。
     　　4. 學習型導向創業競賽整體學習成效較實務型導向創業競賽佳。
     　　5. 競賽參與動機對於知識學習、能力提升與整體學習成效有明顯正相關。
     　　6. 不同的團隊背景其對於知識學習、能力提升與整體學習成效無明顯差異。
     　　7. 團隊運作情形對於知識學習、能力提升與整體學習成效有明顯正相關。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 　　There are more and more entrepreneurial competitions held by universities or big famous companies years by years. The number of teams participating games grows rapidly and the region of some contest expands from within a college activity to a global one. With this popular activities, it also makes all famous universities and colleges pay much attention to entrepreneurial research and the quantity and variety of entrepreneurial courses have become increasingly important.
     　　With foreign entrepreneurial competitions’ popular, the tow entrepreneurial competitions in Taiwan are also get into 4th . This study try to focus on entrepreneurial competitions’ learning effect.
     　　Therefore, if there any different learning effect on entrepreneurial knowledge and skill between different competition model, team background, motivation, even if teamwork situation?
     　　This study has adopted structural questionnaire and case study to collect data and information. The major study targets are the members of 3rd TIC100 Technology Innovation Competition and 3rd Industrial Bank of Taiwan Cross-Century Entrepreneur Competition.
     　　After doing interview and analysis, it gets several conclusions in this investigation:
     　　1. It indeed can learn about entrepreneurial knowledge and skill through entrepreneurial competition.
     　　2. The learning effect on entrepreneurial knowledge and skill will be better by taking entrepreneurial course and participating in entrepreneurial competition.
     　　3. There are not noticeable different on learning effect between different entrepreneurial competition model.
     　　4. Learning-orientated entrepreneurial competition’s learning effect is better then practical-orientated entrepreneurial competition.
     　　5. There are noticeable correlation between participating motivation and learning effect.
     　　6. There are not noticeable different on learning effect between different team background.
     　　7. There are noticeable correlation between teamwork situation and learning effect.		en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 謝辭
     摘要
     Abstract
     目錄
     表目錄
     圖目次
     第一章 緒論-----1
     　　第一節 研究動機與背景-----1
     　　第二節 研究目的與問題-----2
     　　第三節 論文架構-----3
     第二章 文獻探討-----4
     　　第一節 創業的知識與能力-----4
     　　第二節 學習理論-----14
     　　第三節 團隊運作-----18
     　　第四節 創業競賽-----31
     第三章 研究方法-----41
     　　第一節 研究架構-----41
     　　第二節 研究變數說明-----43
     　　第三節 研究對象與資料蒐集-----45
     　　第四節 問卷設計-----46
     　　第五節 資料分析方法-----48
     　　第六節 信度與效度-----49
     第四章 資料分析與討論-----50
     　　第一節 樣本描述-----50
     　　第二節 競賽學習機制與學習成效之關係-----57
     　　第三節 團隊與其學習成效之關係-----60
     　　第四節 競賽學習機制探討-----69
     　　第五節 競賽獲獎效應-----75
     第五章 結論與建議-----78
     　　第一節 研究發現-----78
     　　第二節 研究建議-----81
     　　第三節 後續研究建議-----82
     　　第四節 研究限制-----83
     參考文獻----- 84
     　　中文部分-----84
     　　英文部分-----86
     附錄
     　　附錄一 第三屆TIC100科技創新競賽問卷
     　　附錄二 第三屆台灣工業銀行創業大賽問卷
     　　附錄三 第三屆TIC100科技創新競賽創業構想規劃書
     　　附錄四 第三屆台灣工業銀行創業大賽創業計畫書參考格式
     
     表目錄
     表2-1-1 科技管理(MOT)所需的技能-----7
     表2-1-2 創業家能力及管理者能力文獻整理表-----11
     表2-1-3 創業計畫書所涵蓋之知識領域-----12
     表2-2-1 學習機制相關學理整理-----17
     表2-3-1 團隊特質與運作-----21
     表2-3-2 團隊組成因素對團隊績效的影響結果摘要表-----23
     表2-3-3 團隊結構因素對團隊績效影響結果摘要表-----25
     表2-3-4 團隊運作因素對團隊績效影響結果摘要表-----26
     表2-3-5 高效能團隊的特質-----28
     表2-4-1 國內兩大創業競賽學習機制比較-----40
     表3-4-1 本研究知識的學習量表問卷題號-----46
     表3-6-1 本研究研究變項信度分析-----49
     表4-1-1 問卷回收分析表-----50
     表4-1-2 樣本分析表-----50
     表4-1-3 參賽成員背景統計-----51
     表4-2-1 競賽學習機制與學習成效分析表-----57
     表4-2-2 知識學習與能力提升之相關度-----58
     表4-2-3 競賽學習機制與學習成效分析表-----58
     表4-3-1 團隊運作與學習成效之相關度-----60
     表4-3-2 參與動機與知識學習成效分析-----63
     表4-3-3 參與動機與能力提升成效分析-----64
     表4-3-4 參與動機與總學習成效分析-----65
     表4-3-5 團隊屬性與學習成效分析表-----66
     表4-3-6 團隊屬性與學習成效分析表-----66
     表4-3-7 競賽參與動機分類表-----67
     
     圖目錄
     圖2-1-1 Timmons（1999）創業精神的觀念性架構-----9
     圖2-2-1 組織的動態學習系統-----16
     圖3-1-1 本研究架構圖-----42
     圖4-1-1 參賽團隊屬性分佈圖-----52
     圖4-1-2 參賽者性別分佈圖-----53
     圖4-1-3 參賽者身份分佈圖-----54
     圖4-1-4 參賽者年齡分佈圖-----55
     圖4-1-5 參賽者學歷分佈圖-----56
     圖4-3-1 參與動機分析圖-----62		-
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝辭
     摘要
     Abstract
     目錄
     表目錄
     圖目次
     第一章 緒論-----1
     　　第一節 研究動機與背景-----1
     　　第二節 研究目的與問題-----2
     　　第三節 論文架構-----3
     第二章 文獻探討-----4
     　　第一節 創業的知識與能力-----4
     　　第二節 學習理論-----14
     　　第三節 團隊運作-----18
     　　第四節 創業競賽-----31
     第三章 研究方法-----41
     　　第一節 研究架構-----41
     　　第二節 研究變數說明-----43
     　　第三節 研究對象與資料蒐集-----45
     　　第四節 問卷設計-----46
     　　第五節 資料分析方法-----48
     　　第六節 信度與效度-----49
     第四章 資料分析與討論-----50
     　　第一節 樣本描述-----50
     　　第二節 競賽學習機制與學習成效之關係-----57
     　　第三節 團隊與其學習成效之關係-----60
     　　第四節 競賽學習機制探討-----69
     　　第五節 競賽獲獎效應-----75
     第五章 結論與建議-----78
     　　第一節 研究發現-----78
     　　第二節 研究建議-----81
     　　第三節 後續研究建議-----82
     　　第四節 研究限制-----83
     參考文獻----- 84
     　　中文部分-----84
     　　英文部分-----86
     附錄
     　　附錄一 第三屆TIC100科技創新競賽問卷
     　　附錄二 第三屆台灣工業銀行創業大賽問卷
     　　附錄三 第三屆TIC100科技創新競賽創業構想規劃書
     　　附錄四 第三屆台灣工業銀行創業大賽創業計畫書參考格式
     
     表目錄
     表2-1-1 科技管理(MOT)所需的技能-----7
     表2-1-2 創業家能力及管理者能力文獻整理表-----11
     表2-1-3 創業計畫書所涵蓋之知識領域-----12
     表2-2-1 學習機制相關學理整理-----17
     表2-3-1 團隊特質與運作-----21
     表2-3-2 團隊組成因素對團隊績效的影響結果摘要表-----23
     表2-3-3 團隊結構因素對團隊績效影響結果摘要表-----25
     表2-3-4 團隊運作因素對團隊績效影響結果摘要表-----26
     表2-3-5 高效能團隊的特質-----28
     表2-4-1 國內兩大創業競賽學習機制比較-----40
     表3-4-1 本研究知識的學習量表問卷題號-----46
     表3-6-1 本研究研究變項信度分析-----49
     表4-1-1 問卷回收分析表-----50
     表4-1-2 樣本分析表-----50
     表4-1-3 參賽成員背景統計-----51
     表4-2-1 競賽學習機制與學習成效分析表-----57
     表4-2-2 知識學習與能力提升之相關度-----58
     表4-2-3 競賽學習機制與學習成效分析表-----58
     表4-3-1 團隊運作與學習成效之相關度-----60
     表4-3-2 參與動機與知識學習成效分析-----63
     表4-3-3 參與動機與能力提升成效分析-----64
     表4-3-4 參與動機與總學習成效分析-----65
     表4-3-5 團隊屬性與學習成效分析表-----66
     表4-3-6 團隊屬性與學習成效分析表-----66
     表4-3-7 競賽參與動機分類表-----67
     
     圖目錄
     圖2-1-1 Timmons（1999）創業精神的觀念性架構-----9
     圖2-2-1 組織的動態學習系統-----16
     圖3-1-1 本研究架構圖-----42
     圖4-1-1 參賽團隊屬性分佈圖-----52
     圖4-1-2 參賽者性別分佈圖-----53
     圖4-1-3 參賽者身份分佈圖-----54
     圖4-1-4 參賽者年齡分佈圖-----55
     圖4-1-5 參賽者學歷分佈圖-----56
     圖4-3-1 參與動機分析圖-----62		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2010000154en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 創業競賽zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學習成效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學習機制zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 團隊運作zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) entrepreneurial competitionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) learning effecten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) learning mechanismsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) teamworken_US
dc.title (題名) 創業競賽團隊與競賽機制對學習成效之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分
     1.方世杰、鄭仲興(民90.12)，「組織間學習機制與合作研發之組織學習績效的實證研究─組織間互動之觀點」，管理學報18卷4期
     2.台灣工業銀行(民90)，「第三屆創業大賽專刊」，www.wewin.com.tw
     3. 李佩芬 (民89.1)，「競標下世紀楊致遠-大學創業競賽，為何風起雲湧？」，數位時代第七期
     4. 李弘暉(民86)，〈團隊原理〉，中國行政評論，第6卷，第2期，頁73- 86
     5. 李文豪(1993)，新產品快速研發之組織配合
     6. 司徒達賢(民90)，「從企業管理知識內涵與結構談企業知識之傳習方法」
     7. 吳定(民85)，《組織發展理論與技術》，台北：順達出版社。
     8. 呂國禎(民91.4)，「大學生創業風潮來了！」，新新聞790期
     9. 吳韻儀 (民90.5)，2001全美MBA排行榜(P.174)，天下CHEERS雜誌8期
     10.劭瑞珍譯，Bower and Hilgard 原著，1990，學習理論：學習活動的規律探索，五南：台北
     11.孫本初 (民86年)，《公共管理》，台北：時英出版社
     12.研華文教基金會(民90)，「TIC100科技創新執行計畫」，www.tic100.org.tw
     13.徐銘宏(民87)，「創造力環境特質與學習型策略關係之質化比較研究-實質選擇權觀點及其應用」，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
     14.涂藝鐘(民86)，「經營洞視與團隊練達性對組織創導團隊績效的影響」，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文
     15.黃炳滄(民81)，「創業行為﹑個人特質﹑人際網絡及社會傾向間之關聯性研究以管理顧問業為例」，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
     16.黃嘉嘉(民88)，「團隊建立之研究：一個組織的觀點」，私立中國文化大學政治學研究所碩士論文
     17.莊士杰(民86)，「團隊學習之深度匯談實證研究」，國立雲林技術學院企業管理技術研究所碩士論文
     18.高志宏(1993)，管理行為與專案特徵對專案績效的權變影響研究：以某民營研究機構之科技專案為例
     19.張東峰、謝進興編譯，Hilgard等原著，1984，心理學，台北：桂冠
     20.張春興及楊國樞，1993，心理學，台北：三民
     21.溫肇東(民88)，「從MIT50K到TIC100─成功的科技創業催生者」
     22.溫肇東(民90)，「創業精神的學習平台─創業競賽與創業課程」
     23.楊曙維(民90)，「知識型團隊特性與知識管理策略關係之研究」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文
     24.蔡明宏，「以創造力為基礎的競爭策略-意會過程部分」
     25.劉萍、李盈穎 (民90.11)，「少年董事長-傳奇五味雜成」，數位週刊64期
     26.廖世德譯，Ferguson原著，1993，寶瓶同謀，台北：方智
     27.鄭俐敏(民89)，「團隊知識轉換與知識創造的實驗研究：知識螺旋理論的驗證」，私立東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
     28.鄭仲興(民89)，「組織間學習機制的建立與學習績效之研究以廠商參與工研院科技專案為例」，國立義守大學管理研究所碩士論文
     英文部分
     1.Allen, T.J.(1971).”Communications, technology transfer, and the role of technical gatekeeper”,R&D Management, 1,pp.14-21.
     2.Allen, T.J.(1977).”Managing the flow of technology”, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
     3.Ancona,D.G. and Caldwell,D.F.(1990).”Beyond boundary spanning:Managing external dependence inproduct development teams”, Journal of high Technology Management Research, 1,pp.119-135
     4.Ancona,D.G. and Caldwell,D.F.(1992a).”Demography and design:Predictors of new product team performance”, Organizational Science,3(3),pp.321-341
     5.Ancona,D.G. and Caldwell,D.F.(1992b).”Bridging the boundary:External process and performance in oraganizational teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly,37,pp.634-665
     6.Aulakh,P.S.;Kotabe,M.&Sahay,A.(1996),”Trust and performance in cross-border marketing partnerships:A behavioral approach”,Journal of International Business Studies,27(5),pp.1005-1032
     7.Argyris,Chris 1990 “Overcoming Organizational Defenses：Facilitating Organizational Learning Needham, MA：Allen and Bacon”
     8.Bennis, W. (1989) On Becoming a Leader
     9.Benjamin,B.(1993).”Understanding the political dynamic of developing new products”, Working paper,Stanford university Graduate school of Business Standford, CA.
     10.Brown, S.L.Eisenhardt, K.M.(1995).”Product development:Past research, Present findings,and future directions”, Academy of Management Review, 20(2),pp343-378.
     11.Carayannis ,E. G ,Alexander ,J, & Ioannidis ,A.(2000),”Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government-university-industry(GUI)R&D partnerships in the US, Germany and France”,Technovation,20(9),pp.477-488
     12.Cooke,R.A. and J.L.Szumal(1994).”The Impact of group Interaction Style on Problem Solving Effectiveness”, Journal of Applied Beheavioral Science,30(4),December,pp.415-437
     13.Clark,K.B. and Fujimoto, T.(1991).Product development performance, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
     14.Cooper, R.G.(1987).”What Makes a New Product a Winner:Success Factors at the Project Level”, R&D Management, 17(3),pp.175-189.
     15.Dodgson, M.(1993),”Learning, trust, and technological collaboration”, Human Relations,46:1, pp.77-95.
     16.Dussauge ,P. ,Garrette ,B.& Mitchell ,W.(2000)”Learning form competing partners: Outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia”, Strategic Management Journal,21 ,pp.99-126.
     17.Dyer ,J.H. & Singh ,H.(1998),”The relational view:Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage” ,Academy of Management Review, 23:4 ,pp.660-679.
     18.Dougherty,D.(1990).”Understanding new markets for new products”, Strategic Management Journal,11,pp.59-78
     19.Dougherty,D.(1992).”A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation”, Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue,13,pp77-92
     20.Elisabeth J. Teal, Baylor University; Charles W Hofer,The University of Georgia “The determinants of new venture success strategy,industry structure,and founding entrepreneurial team”
     21.French, W. L., W. L. & Bell, C. H. Jr 1995　　Organization Development : Behavioral science Interventions for Organization Improvement. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice-Hall, Inc.
     22.Francis, Dave & Young, Don 1992　　Improving Work Groups : a Practical Manual for Team Building. San Francisco, CA : Pfeiffer & Company.
     23.Gladstein, D.L.(1984).”Group in Context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness”,Administrative Science Quality,29, pp.499-517.
     24.Gold, B.(1987).”Approaches to accelerating product and process development”,Journal of Product Innovation Management,4(2),June,pp.81-88.
     25.Grant,R. M.(1996),”Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal,17 ,Winter Special Issue ,pp.109-122.
     26.Guzzo, R. A., Salas, E., & Associates 1995 Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass Publishers.
     27.Gulati, R.(1999),”Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation”, Strategic Management Journal,20 ,pp.397-420.
     28.Gupta,A.K. and Wilemon, D.L.(1990).”Accelerating the development of technology-based new Product”,California Management Review,32(2),Winter,pp.24-44
     29.Gupta ,A. K. & Govindarajan ,V.(2000),”Knowledge flows within multinational coroprations”, Strategic Management Journal,21 ,pp.473-496
     30.Hamel ,G.(1991),”Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international stragegic alliances”, Strategic Management Journal, 12,pp.83-103
     31.HR Management(1995).Nov,P.48.
     32.Inkpen, A. C.(1998).``Learning and Knowledge Acquisition Through International Strategic Alliances``,Academy of Management Executive,12:4,pp.69-80.
     33.Jari Handelberg, Helsinki School of Economics and BA; Shailendra Vyakarnam, Nottingham Business School“Eentrepreneurial top management team demography, process and organizational growth: differential effects by strategic orientation and perceived competitive conditions”
     34.Johson, David.W.,Johnson,R.T. and Smith,K.(1989)”Controversy without Decision Making Stituations”,in M.Afzalur Rahim, Managing Conflict:An
     35.Joyce, W.F.(1986).”Matrix organizations:A social experiment”,Academy of Management Journal, 3,pp536-561.
     36.Kerzner, Harold.(1982),”Conflicts:The Conflict Environment”in Project Management for Executives, Kerzner, H.eds.New York :Van Noatrand Reinhold Company,pp556-560.
     37.Kirzner, I.(1973), Competition and entrepreneurship, Chicago:the university of Chicago press,p.23
     38.Katzenbach, Jon R. & Smith, Douglas K. 1993　　 “The Discipline of Teams” Harvard Business Review, Mar.-Apr. pp.111- 120.
     39.Katz, R.(1982).”The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance” Administrative Science Quarterly, 27,pp81-104.
     40.Keller, R.T.(1986).”Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, 29,pp715-726.
     41.Kogut B. & Zander, U.(1992),”Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology”, Organization Science,3:3,August, pp.383-396.
     42.Leonard-Barton, D.(1995). Wellsprings of Lnowkdge: Building and Sustainirg the Sources of Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
     43.Lane P. J. & Lubatkin ,M.(1998)”Relative absorptive capacity and interogranizational learning” , Strategic Management Journal, 19 ,pp461-477
     44.Leavitt, H.J.and J. Lipman-Blumen(1995).”Hot Group”, Havard Business Review, July-August,pp.109-116.
     45.Lorenzoni, G. and A. Lipparini(1999).``The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study``, Strategic Management Journal, 20, pp.317-338.
     46.Mabert, V.A.;Muth,J.F. and Schmenner,R.W.(1992).”Collapsing new product development times:six case studies”,Journal of Product Innovation Management ,9(3),September,pp.200-212.
     47.McGrath. R. G.;Venkataraman, S.;MacMillan ,I.C.(1995),”Defining and developing competence:A strategic process paradigm”, Strategic Management Journal,16,pp.251-275.
     48.McGrath. R. G.;Venkataraman, S.;TSAI ,M.H. and MacMillan,I.(1996),”Innovation, Competitive Adventage and Rent:A Model and Test”,Forthcoming,March, Management Science, 42(3),March,pp.389-403
     49.Millson,M.R.;Raj,S.P. and Wilemon.D.(1992)”A survey of major approaches for acceleration new product development”,J Journal of Product Innovation Management 9(1),March,pp.53-69.
     50.Mitsuko Hirata, Tokai University “Start-up teams and organizational growth in japan venture firms”
     51.Manz, C. C. & Sims, H. P.Jr. 1990　　 Super Leading : Leading Other to Lead Themselves. New York: Berkeley Books.
     52.Mallick, Debasish N.; Chaudhury, Abhijit “Technology management education in MBA programs: a comparative study of knowledge and skill requirements” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management Volume: 17, Issue: 2, June, 2000, pp. 153-173
     53.Montebello, Anthony R. & Buzzotta Victor R 1993　　 “Work Teams That Work” Training & Development Journal, 47(3), pp59-64
     54.McGohee,W. and Tayler, J.w.,1961,Training In Business and Industry,New York:John Wiley and Sons.
     55.Nonaka ,I.(1994),”A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”, Organization Science, 5(1),pp.14-37
     56.Pisano, G.P.(1994).”Knowledge, Integration, and the Locus of Learning:An Empirical Analysis of Process development”, Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp.85-100.
     57.Polanyi, M.(1962).Personal knowledge : Towards a postcritical philosophy. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
     58.Powell, W. W., K. W. Kouput and L. Smith-Doerr(1996).``interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology``, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, pp.116-145.
     59.Popper M. & Lipshitz ,R.(1998), “Organizational learning mechanisms a structural and cultural approach to oragizational learning”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Socience,34(2) ,pp.161-179.
     60.Quick , Thomas L. 1992　　 Successful Team Building. New York : American Management　 Association . pp.16-17.
     61.Raia, E.(1991).”Taking time out of product design”,Purchasing, 110(6)April 4,pp.36-39.
     62.Ray, D. & Bronstein H. 1995　　 Teaming Up : Making the Transition to a Self — Directed, Team —Based Organization. New York : McGraw — Hill, Inc. Robbins, Stephen P
     63.Rosenau, Milton D.,Jr.(1988).”Faster new product development”, Journal of Product Development.
     64.Robbins,S.P.,1978,Personel：The Management of Human Resource ,New York：Prentice-Hall
     65.Steensma, H. H.(1996),”Acquiring technological competencies through inter-organization collaboration : An organizational learning perspective”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,12(4),pp.267-286.
     66.Shnok, J. H. 1982 Working in Teams：A Practicsl Manual for Improving Work Groups. New York：AMACOM Press.
     67.Timmons J. A. (1999)，New Venture Creation, Irwin McGraw-Hill 1999 ,p37-40
     68.Uttal, B.(1987).”Speeding new ideas to market”, Fortune, 115(5), March 2,pp.62-66.
     69.Van Aken,J.E. & Weggeman ,H.P.(2000), “Managing learning in informal innovation networks: Overcomming the Daphne-dilemma”, R&D Management, 30(2) ,pp.139-149.
     70.Vesey, Joseph T.(1991).”The new competetitors think in term of speed to market”SAM Advanced Management Journal, 56(4), autumn pp.26-33.
     71.Wolff,M.F.(1992)”Working Faster”,Research Technology Management November/December,35(6),pp.10-12.
     72.Ziger, B.J. and Maidique, M.(1990).”A model of new product development:An empirical test”, Management Science, 36,pp.867-883.		zh_TW