學術產出-Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 左右共治vs.藍綠共治-法國與臺灣共治與否的賽局分析
其他題名 The Game Theory Analysis on Cohabitation in France and Taiwan
作者 黃宗昊
Huang, Tsung-Hao
關鍵詞 半總統制; 共治; 賽局理論; 兩輪投票制; 單記不可讓渡投票
semi-presidentialism; cohabitation; game theory; runoff; SNTV
日期 2012-09
上傳時間 9-May-2016 17:14:33 (UTC+8)
摘要 法國與臺灣的政府體制都屬於半總統制,法國的憲政經驗中曾出現過三次的「左右共治」,臺灣的憲政經驗中卻從未出現過「藍綠共治」,何以如此?這是本文欲探討的課題。本文藉助賽局理論作為分析工具,探討制度安排如何影響行動者間的策略互動,以致最後產生了共治與否的差異。法國與臺灣擁有不同的選舉制度和不同的國會保障機制,在兩種制度因素的交互作用下,會引導分屬不同政黨陣營的總統和國會多數產生不同的政治計算與策略互動,最終導致法國出現「左右共治」,臺灣卻沒有出現「藍綠共治」。
Both France and Taiwan’s political systems are semi-presidential. However, “cohabitation” in French constitutional experience has occurred three times while Taiwan has never seen “cohabitation” until now. Finding the reason for this difference is the central question of this paper. By using the game theory as an analysis tool, the paper explores how the institutional design influences the actors’ strategic interactions, which underlies the discrepancy between France and Taiwan in “cohabitation”. France and Taiwan have different electoral systems and different safeguard clauses of the congressional term. Therefore, differences in political calculations and strategic interactions are the two institutional factors that result in the president and the parliamentary majority belonging to different party coalitions, and which lead to the fact that France has seen “cohabitation” while Taiwan has not.
關聯 問題與研究, 51(3), 87-127
Issues & studies
資料類型 article
dc.creator (作者) 黃宗昊zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Huang, Tsung-Hao-
dc.date (日期) 2012-09-
dc.date.accessioned 9-May-2016 17:14:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-May-2016 17:14:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-May-2016 17:14:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95792-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 法國與臺灣的政府體制都屬於半總統制,法國的憲政經驗中曾出現過三次的「左右共治」,臺灣的憲政經驗中卻從未出現過「藍綠共治」,何以如此?這是本文欲探討的課題。本文藉助賽局理論作為分析工具,探討制度安排如何影響行動者間的策略互動,以致最後產生了共治與否的差異。法國與臺灣擁有不同的選舉制度和不同的國會保障機制,在兩種制度因素的交互作用下,會引導分屬不同政黨陣營的總統和國會多數產生不同的政治計算與策略互動,最終導致法國出現「左右共治」,臺灣卻沒有出現「藍綠共治」。-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Both France and Taiwan’s political systems are semi-presidential. However, “cohabitation” in French constitutional experience has occurred three times while Taiwan has never seen “cohabitation” until now. Finding the reason for this difference is the central question of this paper. By using the game theory as an analysis tool, the paper explores how the institutional design influences the actors’ strategic interactions, which underlies the discrepancy between France and Taiwan in “cohabitation”. France and Taiwan have different electoral systems and different safeguard clauses of the congressional term. Therefore, differences in political calculations and strategic interactions are the two institutional factors that result in the president and the parliamentary majority belonging to different party coalitions, and which lead to the fact that France has seen “cohabitation” while Taiwan has not.-
dc.format.extent 2328158 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 問題與研究, 51(3), 87-127-
dc.relation (關聯) Issues & studies-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 半總統制; 共治; 賽局理論; 兩輪投票制; 單記不可讓渡投票-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) semi-presidentialism; cohabitation; game theory; runoff; SNTV-
dc.title (題名) 左右共治vs.藍綠共治-法國與臺灣共治與否的賽局分析zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) The Game Theory Analysis on Cohabitation in France and Taiwan-
dc.type (資料類型) article-