Publications-Journal Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 析論教育部「大學評鑑法」之適法性與合憲性
其他題名 An Analysis on the Legality and Constitutionality of MOE`s University Evaluation Rules
作者 陳文政
Chen, Wen-Cheng
關鍵詞 大學自治; 大學監督; 大學評鑑; 大學法; 大學評鑑辦法; 合法性; 合憲性
日期 2008-06
上傳時間 20-May-2016 11:16:18 (UTC+8)
摘要 我國憲法係以制度保障大學自治,同時也授權國家依法監督大學。《大學法》有關大學評鑑之規範符合憲法之要求,即一方面賦予各大學自訂規則實施自我評鑑,一方面授權教育部訂定辦法進行「以大學為對象,以校務行政為內容」之大學評鑑。
The provisions of ROC’s constitution protect the autonomy of univsersities by means of institutional guarantees, and grant the government the right to supervise universities according to the enacted law. Under the framework of the constitution, the University Act authorizes every university to formulate rules for regular self-evaluation, while investing the Ministry of Education with the power to institute regulations governing the evaluation of universities. However, the object of university evaluation shall be the whole university, and its contents shall be limited to the administrative affairs of a given university.
The University Evaluation Rules, promulgated by the Ministry of Education, however, exceed their power to enlarge the object of evaluation to the university’s departments and institutes, and extend the items of evaluation to the curriculum and teaching affairs, which pertain to the core contents of the autonomy of universities; hence they violate the University Act and the Constitution. But it will be constitutional if the Ministry of Education restricts its regular evaluations to university administrative affairs.
In addition, in the evaluation process, both the Ministry of Education and the Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan acted against the due process of the law, and the evaluation reports they made infringe upon university autonomy by requesting the evaluated departments and institutes to adjust their curriculum and teaching programs. Accordingly, it goes without saying that the actions they took are unconstitutional.
關聯 法學評論, 103, 1-61
資料類型 article
dc.creator (作者) 陳文政zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Wen-Cheng
dc.date (日期) 2008-06
dc.date.accessioned 20-May-2016 11:16:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 20-May-2016 11:16:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 20-May-2016 11:16:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96738-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 我國憲法係以制度保障大學自治,同時也授權國家依法監督大學。《大學法》有關大學評鑑之規範符合憲法之要求,即一方面賦予各大學自訂規則實施自我評鑑,一方面授權教育部訂定辦法進行「以大學為對象,以校務行政為內容」之大學評鑑。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The provisions of ROC’s constitution protect the autonomy of univsersities by means of institutional guarantees, and grant the government the right to supervise universities according to the enacted law. Under the framework of the constitution, the University Act authorizes every university to formulate rules for regular self-evaluation, while investing the Ministry of Education with the power to institute regulations governing the evaluation of universities. However, the object of university evaluation shall be the whole university, and its contents shall be limited to the administrative affairs of a given university.
The University Evaluation Rules, promulgated by the Ministry of Education, however, exceed their power to enlarge the object of evaluation to the university’s departments and institutes, and extend the items of evaluation to the curriculum and teaching affairs, which pertain to the core contents of the autonomy of universities; hence they violate the University Act and the Constitution. But it will be constitutional if the Ministry of Education restricts its regular evaluations to university administrative affairs.
In addition, in the evaluation process, both the Ministry of Education and the Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan acted against the due process of the law, and the evaluation reports they made infringe upon university autonomy by requesting the evaluated departments and institutes to adjust their curriculum and teaching programs. Accordingly, it goes without saying that the actions they took are unconstitutional.
dc.format.extent 885181 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 法學評論, 103, 1-61
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 大學自治; 大學監督; 大學評鑑; 大學法; 大學評鑑辦法; 合法性; 合憲性
dc.title (題名) 析論教育部「大學評鑑法」之適法性與合憲性zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) An Analysis on the Legality and Constitutionality of MOE`s University Evaluation Rules
dc.type (資料類型) article