| dc.creator (作者) | 葛斯曼;鄺允銘 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Gershman, Bennett L.;Kwang, Yun-Ming | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2010-08 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 20-May-2016 14:19:32 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 20-May-2016 14:19:32 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 20-May-2016 14:19:32 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96755 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 檢察官作為一個正義的守護者，不僅要使有罪的人被定罪，更應該保護無辜的人使其不受傷害。美國的檢察官享有法律所賦予極為廣泛而又極少節制的權力，其權力足以摧毀一個人的名譽、自由、甚至生命。司法審判最主要的目的是在發現事實真相，而不是在定罪。而美國司法的核心價值觀是：寧可錯放一個有罪的人，也不可錯判一個無辜的人。因此，檢察官在法律上及道德上都負有維護事實真相之義務。這項義務包括消極及積極的義務。消極義務為不得從事有害於發現事實真相的行為，包括不得歪曲事實及顛倒是非、不得從事有誤導或煽動性的言行、不得隱匿有利被告的證據，以及不得從事其他有害於發現事實真相的行為等。積極義務則為對於案件的事實真相及證據應該預先作個人的判斷，如果經過仔細查證之後，仍然無法確信被告有罪而無合理懷疑時，就應該有道德勇氣拒絕起訴。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Curiously, despite extensive documentation of erroneous convictions, widespread prosecutorial abuses that contribute to wrongful convictions, and a plethora of academic literature on the ethical responsibilities of prosecutor, there has been little discussion of the prosecutor`s legal and ethical duty to truth. As I hope to demonstrate, the prosecutor has a legal and ethical duty to promote truth and to refrain from conduct that impedes truth. The courts have explicitly recognized the existence of this duty, and have implicitly recognized this duty by reversing convictions when a prosecutor engages in conduct that undermines the search for truth. | |
| dc.format.extent | 175 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 法學評論, 116, 293-387 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 正當程序; 無合理懷疑; 檢察官; 正義守護者; 當事人主義; 自由裁量權; 道德勇氣; 無罪推定; 有罪推定; 錯誤判決; 不當行為; 發現事實真相 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Due Process; Criminal Law; Prosecutors; Misconduct; Professional Ethics | |
| dc.title (題名) | 檢察官維護事實真相之義務 | zh_TW |
| dc.title.alternative (其他題名) | The Prosecutor’s Duty to Truth | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
