| dc.creator (作者) | 張新平 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Chang, Shin-pyng | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2009-12 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 20-May-2016 15:36:25 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 20-May-2016 15:36:25 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 20-May-2016 15:36:25 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96778 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文擬針對國內規章所生上述爭議問題提出探討。首先開宗明義界定GATS國內規章之意義，其次探究GATS規範國內規章之目的，接下來解析GATS第六條各項規定之意涵，最後探討在研擬國內規章準則時所產生之各項爭議問題，期能釐清國內規章及其準則談判時產生之疑義。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The domestic regulation contained in Article 6 of GATS and its developments have been accompanied by a growing public debate about their substantive nature, benefits and detriments, which include, inter alia, the definition, scope, and purpose of domestic regulation, and some ambiguous comments, such as “Article 6 is being strengthened with the aim of requiring Members to show that they are employing least trade-restrictive policies. The legal tests under consideration would outlaw the use of non-market mechanisms such as cross-subsidization, universal risk pooling, solidarity, and public accountability in the de-sign, funding and delivery of public services as being anti-competitive and restrictive to trade.”\\r This paper discusses and analyses the legal dimension of domestic regulation. The first four sections analyze the definition, scope and pur-poses of domestic regulation. The fifth section discusses controversial issues involved in developing Disciplines on Domestic Regulation. This paper also aims to stimulate academic debate and clarify some ambi-guous concepts. | |
| dc.format.extent | 813787 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 法學評論, 112, 137-199 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 世界貿易組織; 服務貿易總協定; 國內規章; 必要性; 公開化 | |
| dc.title (題名) | WTO服務貿易國內規章有關問題之探討 | |
| dc.title.alternative (其他題名) | Domestic Regulation and Service Trade in WTO | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
