| dc.creator (作者) | 王金壽;魏宏儒 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Wang, Chin-Shou;Wei, Hung-Ru | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2011-02 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 20-May-2016 16:06:25 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 20-May-2016 16:06:25 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 20-May-2016 16:06:25 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96792 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 二○○七年，高雄市長選舉案的判決書所附註的不同意見書，引起社會大眾對於公開不同意見書的討論。本文將探討不同意見書應該公開的理由，特別是普通法院應公開不同意見書，以達到民主對司法的可問責性，並且說明不同意見書制度能成為民主監督司法重要的一環。當法官對判決有異議時，可提出不同意見書說明自己的意見；而民眾則可透過不同意見書與判決書的比照，更能知悉法官判決過程是否公允，讓人民看見法官的真實想法。本研究以民主可問責性的立場，說明不同意見書的公開，並不損及民主制度下的司法權威，及對評議秘密原則的再闡釋，並不危及司法獨立，相反地，是有所助益。除此之外，本文亦將討論法官之間的權力關係。最後說明法官良知問題以及討論公開不同意見書之權利與義務。總言之，不同意見書的公開，其效益當大於成本，人民將有機會監督法官判決過程是否公允，法官是否秉持公義來審判，以達到民主監督的效果。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This paper will discuss why judges’ dissents should be made open to the public since their dissents are very important to the judicial democratic accountability. When judges express dissent at a trial, they should have the right to proclaim such dissent publicly. By comparing and contrasting judges’ dissents, the public will be able to examine whether the judges’ decisions are fair and just. In this sense, judges’ dissents do not deteriorate the authority of the judiciary, and they do not violate the principle of secret of deliberation and that of judicial independence. Instead, judges’ dissents may help maintain judicial independence. Moreover, this paper will also discuss how power relations among judges affect the deliberating process since judges’ dissents may help balance unequal powers among judges. In order to increase judicial accountability, judges should have the right and obligation to proclaim their dissents publicly. | |
| dc.format.extent | 1173194 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 法學評論, 119, 1-62 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 不同意見書; 民主可問責性; 評議過程; 司法獨立; 司法權威 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Dissenting Opinion; Democratic Accountability; Deliberating Processes; Judicial Independence; Judicial Authority | |
| dc.title (題名) | 法官的異議與民主可問責性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title.alternative (其他題名) | Judges’ Dissents and Democratic Accountability | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
