| dc.creator (作者) | 邱穗中 ; 葉連祺 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 1995-09 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 4-Jun-2016 14:00:37 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 4-Jun-2016 14:00:37 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 4-Jun-2016 14:00:37 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97621 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究主要在探討Peery (1979)、Coie、Coppotelli和Dodge (1982)、Newcomb 和 Bukowski （ 1983 ）與 Coie 和 Dodge （ 1988 ）等四種雙向度社會計量地位分類方 法的優劣。 研究中以 154 位三、五年級的小學生為樣本，進行四個月的長期研究，分析四 種類模式在各類別的分配情形，考驗各模式分類結果的鑑別效果及時間穩定性。結果顯示這 四種模式都有分類架構上的缺失， 其中 Newcomb 和 Bukowski （ 1983 ）與 Coie 和 Dodge （ 1988 ）模式是較佳的分類方法；另外研究者也針對此二種模式提出若干修正，提 供實際運用的參考。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The purpose of this study was to investigate advantages and disadvanage of four two-dimensional classified system of sociometric status had proposed by Peery (1979), Coie, Coppotelli and Dodge (1982), Newcomb and Bukowski (1983) and Coie and Dodge (1988). 154 third- and fifth-grade children served as subjects at three time-intervals during four monthes. It explored the discriminant validity and tenporal stability of four classified models. The results indicated that none of these was a cerfect classified scheme, so we proposed some modifications. The models of Newcomb and Bukowski (1983) and Coie and Dodge (1988) were the better choices. | |
| dc.format.extent | 115 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 151 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 教育與心理研究, 18,19-50 | |
| dc.relation (關聯) | Journal of Education & Psychology | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 雙向度社會計量地位分類 ; 國小學生 | |
| dc.title (題名) | 雙向度社會計量地位分類方法之比較--以國小學生為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
