Publications-Journal Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 給付型不當得利——以給付目的取代財產損益直接變動的理論及實務發展
其他題名 The Payment Type of "quantum meruit" (unjust enrichment): The Development of the Theory and Practice of "quantum meruit" on Decisions in Purpose of Payment to Replace Direct Shift of Assets
作者 劉昭辰
Liu, Chao-Chen
關鍵詞 給付型不當利; 財產損益變動; 直接因果關係; 間接因果關係; 給付目的決定; 指示給付; 撤銷指示
Payment Type of Quantum meruit; Shift of Assets; Direct Causation, Indirect Causation; Decision in Purpose of Payment; Instruction Payment and Revocation of Instruction
日期 2012-06
上傳時間 17-Jun-2016 12:01:45 (UTC+8)
摘要 德國不當得利制度採「非統一說」,並對給付型不當得利關係的當事人認定,由「直接損益變動」觀點改為「給付目的決定」觀點,其間的變動及對不當得利理論及實務的影響,值得觀察。此外,德國不當得利理論如此的變動,對於我國民法界的影響如何?可否適用於我國第一七九條?亦成為本文的內容重點。
In Germany the “Principle of Separation” has been adopted for the quantum meruit system, and the determination of parties for the payment type of quantum meruit has been amended from the view of direct shift of assets into the view of decision in purpose of payment. It is noteworthy for the changes and impact thereof on the theory and practice of quantum meruit. In addition, what is the impact on ROC Civil Law for such a change of the theory of quantum meruit as was incurred in Germany? Could this be applied to Article 179 of ROC Civil Law? It is the key point of this study.
關聯 法學評論, 127,267-348頁
Chengchi law review
資料類型 article
dc.creator (作者) 劉昭辰zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Liu, Chao-Chen
dc.date (日期) 2012-06
dc.date.accessioned 17-Jun-2016 12:01:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Jun-2016 12:01:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Jun-2016 12:01:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97996-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 德國不當得利制度採「非統一說」,並對給付型不當得利關係的當事人認定,由「直接損益變動」觀點改為「給付目的決定」觀點,其間的變動及對不當得利理論及實務的影響,值得觀察。此外,德國不當得利理論如此的變動,對於我國民法界的影響如何?可否適用於我國第一七九條?亦成為本文的內容重點。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In Germany the “Principle of Separation” has been adopted for the quantum meruit system, and the determination of parties for the payment type of quantum meruit has been amended from the view of direct shift of assets into the view of decision in purpose of payment. It is noteworthy for the changes and impact thereof on the theory and practice of quantum meruit. In addition, what is the impact on ROC Civil Law for such a change of the theory of quantum meruit as was incurred in Germany? Could this be applied to Article 179 of ROC Civil Law? It is the key point of this study.
dc.format.extent 1017983 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 法學評論, 127,267-348頁
dc.relation (關聯) Chengchi law review
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 給付型不當利; 財產損益變動; 直接因果關係; 間接因果關係; 給付目的決定; 指示給付; 撤銷指示
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Payment Type of Quantum meruit; Shift of Assets; Direct Causation, Indirect Causation; Decision in Purpose of Payment; Instruction Payment and Revocation of Instruction
dc.title (題名) 給付型不當得利——以給付目的取代財產損益直接變動的理論及實務發展zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) The Payment Type of "quantum meruit" (unjust enrichment): The Development of the Theory and Practice of "quantum meruit" on Decisions in Purpose of Payment to Replace Direct Shift of Assets
dc.type (資料類型) article