學術產出-Journal Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 議會至上與人大至上——從英國違憲審查的發展看中國違憲審查的未來
作者 劉定基
Liu, Ting-Chi
關鍵詞 違憲審查; 英國; 中國; 議會至上; 人大至上
Constitutional Review; Judicial Review; the United Kingdom; China; Supremacy of Parliament; Supremacy of People’s Congress
日期 2013-12
上傳時間 20-Jun-2016 11:01:07 (UTC+8)
摘要 中國雖於一九五四年即通過公布第一部憲法,但憲法作為國家根本大法的規範性格,並未同時確立。隨著市場經濟的持續發展,如何進一步落實憲法根本大法的規範效力,回應人權保護的要求,建構法律及行政法規牴觸憲法時的違憲審查或監督機制,遂成為一項重點課題。本文擬借鏡採取與「人大至上」相似的「議會至上」原則的英國違憲審查制度發展經驗,探究中國司法機關在違憲審查制度中可能扮演的角色,特別是若尊重中國憲法文本,採取以人民大會常務委員會為中心的違憲審查機制下,各級法院是否仍有參與法規合憲控制的空間?又該如何參與?凡此,均是本文研究的核心問題。
In 1954, the People’s Republic of China promulgated its first constitution; however, at the time, the idea that the constitution is the supreme law of the land was not established. As China’s market economy continues to grow, how to carry out the fundamental mandate of the Constitution, respond to the demand for human rights protection, and create an effective system of constitutional review on laws and regulations become important issues. Based on the development of constitutional review in the United Kingdom under the doctrine of “supremacy of Parliament,” which is similar to the Chinese principle of “supremacy of People’s Parliament,” this article will explore the potential roles that Chinese courts can play in China’s constitutional review process. As the Chinese Constitution explicitly specifies that the Standing Committee of the People’s Congress has the authority to interpret the Constitution and to invalidate subordinate legislation, special attention will be paid to the questions whether and how the Chinese courts can perform constitutional review on parliamentary legislation and other subordinate regulations.
關聯 法學評論, 135,255-306頁
Chengchi law review
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3966%2f102398202013120135004
dc.creator (作者) 劉定基zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Liu, Ting-Chi
dc.date (日期) 2013-12
dc.date.accessioned 20-Jun-2016 11:01:07 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 20-Jun-2016 11:01:07 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 20-Jun-2016 11:01:07 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98037-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 中國雖於一九五四年即通過公布第一部憲法,但憲法作為國家根本大法的規範性格,並未同時確立。隨著市場經濟的持續發展,如何進一步落實憲法根本大法的規範效力,回應人權保護的要求,建構法律及行政法規牴觸憲法時的違憲審查或監督機制,遂成為一項重點課題。本文擬借鏡採取與「人大至上」相似的「議會至上」原則的英國違憲審查制度發展經驗,探究中國司法機關在違憲審查制度中可能扮演的角色,特別是若尊重中國憲法文本,採取以人民大會常務委員會為中心的違憲審查機制下,各級法院是否仍有參與法規合憲控制的空間?又該如何參與?凡此,均是本文研究的核心問題。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In 1954, the People’s Republic of China promulgated its first constitution; however, at the time, the idea that the constitution is the supreme law of the land was not established. As China’s market economy continues to grow, how to carry out the fundamental mandate of the Constitution, respond to the demand for human rights protection, and create an effective system of constitutional review on laws and regulations become important issues. Based on the development of constitutional review in the United Kingdom under the doctrine of “supremacy of Parliament,” which is similar to the Chinese principle of “supremacy of People’s Parliament,” this article will explore the potential roles that Chinese courts can play in China’s constitutional review process. As the Chinese Constitution explicitly specifies that the Standing Committee of the People’s Congress has the authority to interpret the Constitution and to invalidate subordinate legislation, special attention will be paid to the questions whether and how the Chinese courts can perform constitutional review on parliamentary legislation and other subordinate regulations.
dc.format.extent 1141507 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 法學評論, 135,255-306頁
dc.relation (關聯) Chengchi law review
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 違憲審查; 英國; 中國; 議會至上; 人大至上
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Constitutional Review; Judicial Review; the United Kingdom; China; Supremacy of Parliament; Supremacy of People’s Congress
dc.title (題名) 議會至上與人大至上——從英國違憲審查的發展看中國違憲審查的未來zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.3966/102398202013120135004
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.3966%2f102398202013120135004