Publications-Journal Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 無故取得電磁紀錄罪之解釋及立法
作者 薛智仁
Hsueh, Chih-Jen
關鍵詞 無故取得電磁紀錄; 資訊安全之社會信賴; 整體財產利益; 個人秘密利益; 妨害電腦使用罪章; 無故概念; 告訴權人; 致生損害於公眾或他人
Obtaining Magnetic Records; Social Trust in Information Security; Personal Property as a Whole; Personal Privacy; Chapter on Offenses against the Use of Computer; Concept of Without Good Cause; The Person Who Has the Right to File a Law Suit; Causing Damages to the Public or Others
日期 2014-03
上傳時間 20-Jun-2016 11:01:52 (UTC+8)
摘要 針對無故取得他人電磁紀錄的行為,立法者在一九九七年增訂刑法第三二三條,將電磁紀錄視為準動產並適用竊盜罪予以處罰,在二○○三年則是刪除該準動產規定,與刪除及變更他人電磁紀錄的行為一併規定於增訂之第三五九條。此一構成要件的保護法益內涵為何,迄今在實務及學說上尚無共識,相關構成要件的解釋因而顯得漫無方向。其問題根源在於,無故取得電磁紀錄罪的構成要件過於概括,使得各種保護法益的觀點都只能局部解釋本罪的處罰根據。在檢視立法理由的說明及國內學說的主張之後,本文認為在現行法底下,無故取得電磁紀錄罪不在保障資訊安全的社會信賴,也不在保障電磁紀錄之資料私密性,而是在保障個人的整體財產。這個觀點,最符合本罪的立法沿革、法定刑設計及法律明確性的要求。本文依此提出本罪在現行法底下的解釋方案,並附帶檢討最高法院針對臺灣陶氏公司案的判決。同時,為了根本地解決本罪保護方向不明的問題,初步建議未來宜朝保護個人秘密的方向修正本罪。
The act of obtaining magnetic records of others without good cause was criminalized in 1997 by amending Article 323 to consider magnetic records as personal property. In 2003, such amendment was deleted and this act and the act of deleting or altering others’ magnetic records were criminalized in Article 359. The legal interest that the Article sets out to protect is still in controversy both in practice and in academia resulting in widely divided interpretations of the elements of the crime. After reviewing the explanation in criminalizing such act and the opinions in academia, the paper concludes that under the current law, the purpose of criminalizing such act is neither to protect social trust in information security nor to protect the secrecy of the information stored in the magnetic records but to protect personal property as a whole. Only this proposition could fully explain the criminalization of the act, the punishment that imposed on such act and the request for clarity. Based on this, this paper reviews the Supreme Court’s judgment on the Dow Chemical Taiwan case and further suggests amending this Article to protect personal privacy.
關聯 法學評論, 136,45-128頁
Chengchi law review
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3966%2f102398202014030136002
dc.creator (作者) 薛智仁zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsueh, Chih-Jen
dc.date (日期) 2014-03
dc.date.accessioned 20-Jun-2016 11:01:52 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 20-Jun-2016 11:01:52 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 20-Jun-2016 11:01:52 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98039-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 針對無故取得他人電磁紀錄的行為,立法者在一九九七年增訂刑法第三二三條,將電磁紀錄視為準動產並適用竊盜罪予以處罰,在二○○三年則是刪除該準動產規定,與刪除及變更他人電磁紀錄的行為一併規定於增訂之第三五九條。此一構成要件的保護法益內涵為何,迄今在實務及學說上尚無共識,相關構成要件的解釋因而顯得漫無方向。其問題根源在於,無故取得電磁紀錄罪的構成要件過於概括,使得各種保護法益的觀點都只能局部解釋本罪的處罰根據。在檢視立法理由的說明及國內學說的主張之後,本文認為在現行法底下,無故取得電磁紀錄罪不在保障資訊安全的社會信賴,也不在保障電磁紀錄之資料私密性,而是在保障個人的整體財產。這個觀點,最符合本罪的立法沿革、法定刑設計及法律明確性的要求。本文依此提出本罪在現行法底下的解釋方案,並附帶檢討最高法院針對臺灣陶氏公司案的判決。同時,為了根本地解決本罪保護方向不明的問題,初步建議未來宜朝保護個人秘密的方向修正本罪。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The act of obtaining magnetic records of others without good cause was criminalized in 1997 by amending Article 323 to consider magnetic records as personal property. In 2003, such amendment was deleted and this act and the act of deleting or altering others’ magnetic records were criminalized in Article 359. The legal interest that the Article sets out to protect is still in controversy both in practice and in academia resulting in widely divided interpretations of the elements of the crime. After reviewing the explanation in criminalizing such act and the opinions in academia, the paper concludes that under the current law, the purpose of criminalizing such act is neither to protect social trust in information security nor to protect the secrecy of the information stored in the magnetic records but to protect personal property as a whole. Only this proposition could fully explain the criminalization of the act, the punishment that imposed on such act and the request for clarity. Based on this, this paper reviews the Supreme Court’s judgment on the Dow Chemical Taiwan case and further suggests amending this Article to protect personal privacy.
dc.format.extent 1309787 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 法學評論, 136,45-128頁
dc.relation (關聯) Chengchi law review
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 無故取得電磁紀錄; 資訊安全之社會信賴; 整體財產利益; 個人秘密利益; 妨害電腦使用罪章; 無故概念; 告訴權人; 致生損害於公眾或他人
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Obtaining Magnetic Records; Social Trust in Information Security; Personal Property as a Whole; Personal Privacy; Chapter on Offenses against the Use of Computer; Concept of Without Good Cause; The Person Who Has the Right to File a Law Suit; Causing Damages to the Public or Others
dc.title (題名) 無故取得電磁紀錄罪之解釋及立法zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.3966/102398202014030136002
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.3966%2f102398202014030136002